Local Government Boundary Commission For Report No. 394 Local Government Bqvmdriry.Comr.iissiori • :• - .C«« t1',•»/•.?-,.-,-E ,-...'•• • i iCJi L"i;'-• Sciij'.i • • ' • . •'.", '--. ' . .'• •-, ,- . / • 20 Albert I-iiVcaokir.cnt ' '• .V'"-...'••.- • •'

Our reft. LG3C/D/35V':.'.

G Tfcssorcmn Ssq. v;*j.>' 153 Division :-; ;••'.-.;" '..• Howe OfTice ' " " ":" - 50 Q;i£an /imio's Gate SwlH 9AT -••:••- October 1980

rSVTKV 0? El-SC-TCR/'t AnUj^C^^T^ - CO!?:;TY CJ1 SUHHElf' COMM1S3I01PS HKPCPT KO. 394 - COIUUGICNDUM . . - ,--.. -.:.:

1. Elinbridge Borough Council have- drav;n the Coirsiissjcn's attention to certain errors in Iho description c.f the proposed ^altori-on-^haaies electoral division contained in Schedule 2 (pages 2 pjid 3) of the -Cocjtission'.e Report Ho. 39'K ' . '.. - • ?.. The following1 descriptions hr.ve bo en agreed by the Boroud- Council atid Ordriwica Siu:vey*" I would be grateful if you could amend yo'.u1 cc-piss of the report ex

^l^££^£li^L££l£lJl^^ • :' '.:.'' •'"'.•':•'/•'•'•;.' • " • - . ' . -'••' •-"''• ;'. '• - ' '. ' •"•" '"' -• ' ' f '' ':•'•• 3o3.ete fron 'and1'in .line 1 to 'said property and* in line 5» insert:- ar/J ths-t part of Walton Central 7;ard coa,r.encin£ at tj-.p ^motion o.f Kin#c Koad aud Sidney Road on the sout,h(2?.atorr. bcur.dA.vy of V.'alton Central ?t'ao;d, thonoti northwastv-'ards alon^: Sidney Ror-d to a point opposite- tbo oouthcaEtern boundary of n'o. 72 Sidney Hoa-i( thenco • - southvfost-vaxds to sjid alonf: said scutheaKtsrn boo.udary to the northeastern boaridory of }!o,105 Kinga Road, t:isnce /Kii'th\vefl'tv;ardK along- r.aid northoactorn boi\nda.ry to tho voar boundary of the last rasritionfid property, tl^.onoe oouth\fostwards along1 naid rear boundary and the rear boundary of Ko. 103 Kings Ho&d to tho reor boxmiary of llo.l Kings Close, thenco northwactv/ards along said rear bo-^ndary and continuinf; s along '. . , . •-..',;.-: '.::',..,-...••:.>;.-v ••' •• . •• •".-.,. .-. :-- : .-...- . ••

JiSiii:i:i^1'5i)±!r:i2L^2i^^ ;'•• "" ' ' '- •-' fiolete fx'c/fi 'alii' itr lino 24 to 'aoid street* irx lino 26,' insert:- 'to tho reav j of the property knov/n c .s lilcn'diO.R1l the;ice ri03:t}iv;estY/o.vds e.lo.i^ aairl r-i;u' bouriclC'.L'y wn^ the rear boundiU'ioG "cf the r.^ipci-'ties icnown as RcKt.--ilior ";vvo:oa. Fiusfietn, Cottosmore and Selv/otthy to tl1^ Koutlieastc-ru bo'on{'ia;:y of \Valton-on-*l'hiira'»s Bsptiwt CbMrch, thence Goutbvyont'.varcle alon^; oaid southoastorn boundary to Ccl'oy Hoad, thence i no3:thYf-estwai. ds alon^: said road to V/inch3?*tez.' Soadr thence ncrtlyoaiitvwrda alonj^ said road to a point or^o-oitf.1 tr:o aouthv/cst^m bo\ind:iL'y of I:o.l V/?.nchoot;er ;-?oad, thonce northv;oiitv;ardo to arxa aionji said itouthwftfitei'ii bounciary s.v;d in prolongation theiM-oi' to the riarthwciotcrn boundary of No. 63 High Street, thonca oouth^eatwai-'ils along; srdd , .. . northwfcsi-^rn boundary to tha southv/sstcrn bounda.ry .of the Dyr«ott thorice /TonsL'G.!l.ly liorl.hwoJjtv.'arns a.lon.v; B.iid southv/t>nte.v^ boundary to Church V/a'/.k, thonco tiortha.MOtv.xird-'; p.!Oiis• fe.niO V,-'ruk to a ioint oppofdto the re.-u.1 bountuiry oi" No. cjlc K.i^h Stref.'t, thoncft iiortlivro^tY/anlo along ed:jry of. ;.!o. 43 Hiffh Street, thehcc nortt:esstv;.irdo along s«"iil southca.cte.rn boyndary to tho ror.r boundary of the lost mentioned proj>ertyfc thonco northv.'v^Jtwards along; said rear boundary and continuing gene rail" northiveaty&rds alons' the roar boundarieo of Koa. 41b a^ ^11 Hi^h Streot to and cro«ein*; Churchf iold Head In a atjc-aight'ULne. to an-1 /:ensrfil.!y northiv«:?tv»T4vds 'along; the rear boundaries of >jos 39 to la Uigh Street to Church Street, thence southv.:estv:ardo along said a tweet . ' . • ; -.,.-. ;.-.. ;,\ ,. • •' . . .

3. Ccpios ojT .thia letter h.?.ve ber:n sent to County Council, all district Councils in the County and tho Mcir.ber of parlXp-asnt fov the cons-tituency concerned.

L.B GRIKS1IAVT LOCAL GOVERNMENT

UNDARY COMMISSION

FOR ENGLAND

BEPOHT NO. S°* LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND

CHAIRMAN Sir Nicholas Morrison KCB

DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J M Rankin QC

Lady Bowden Mr J T Brockbank Mr R R Thornton CBE DL Mr D P Harrison Professor G E Cherry To the Rt Hon William Whitolnw, Gil MC MP Secretary of State for the Home Department

PifUPOSALS R)H THIS FUTUiiE KLKCTGRAL AhKANGU-UiNTti I'UR THK CUUUTY OF SURREY

1. The last Order under Section 51 of the Local Government Act 1972 in relation to electoral arrangements for districts in the county of Surrey was made on 6 August 1979. As required by Section 63 and Schedule 9 of the Act we have now reviewed the electoral arrangements for that county, using the procedures we had set out in our Report Wo 6.

2. We informed the Surrey County Council in a consultation letter dated 18 September 1979 that we proposed to conduct the review, and sent copies of the letter to all local authorities and parish meetings in the county, to the MPs representing the constituencies concerned, to the headquarters of the main political parties and to the editors both of local papers circulating in the county and of the local government press. Notices in the local press announced the start of the review and invited comments from members of the public and from interested bodies.

3* On 31 January 1980 the County Council submitted to us a draft scheme in which they suggested 76 electoral divisions for the county, each returning one member in accordance with Section 6(2)(a) of the Act.

A. We considered this scheme together with the views expressed by local interests. On 11 April 1980 wo issued draft proposals which we sent to all those who had received our consultation letter or commented on the County Council's draft scheme. Notices were inserted in the local press announcing that the draft proposals had been issued and could be inspected at the County Council's offices*

5. We incorporated in our draft proposals certain modifications to the County Council's draft scheme, designed to take account of local ties and based on comments made about the county scheme. 6. The modifications wo mnde wore us follows:

(a) Klmbridj-'Q .Boroupji We replaced the County Council's arrangements Tor the Walton and Weybridge

area with those suggested by the Chartsey and W.-ilton Labour Party.

(b) Epsom and Evell Borough We replaced the 5 electoral divisions proposed by the County Council with 5 divisions proposed by the Cuddington Residents1 Association.

(°) Guildford Borough We transferred the parish of St Martha from the proposed Shalford division

to the proposed Share division,

(d) District We transferred the parish of Home from the proposed division to

the proposed Lingfield division.

(e ) Barnes of electoral_di visions At tho request of the County Council we changed the name of the proposed f Heather—park division in the Borough of Surrey Heath to Heatheraide and » Parkside, and at the request of Council we changed the

name of the proposed Oxtod and Limps field division to Qxted.

7. We received comments in response to our draft proposals from the Surrey County Council, two borough Councils, one district council, five parish councils, one town council, three Members of Parliament, five county or district councillors, fifteen political organisations, nine other local associations and fifteen members of the public. A list of those who wrote to us is given at Appendix 1 to this Report.

8. The Surrey County Council supported our draft proposals except in respect of our proposals for the Borough of Epsom and hwell and the Walton and Wp.ybri.dge area of the borough of Elmbrid^e0 The^coneidered that in both boroughs the provisions of their original scheme were preferable to those in our dra.ft proposals in that they did not involve the splitting of borough wards or polling districts. They were wholly opposed to our proposals for the Walton and Weybridge area of Elmbridge but stated that, if we were unwilling to accept their original proposals for Epsom and Ewell, they would accept our proposals for that borough as being next in their order of preference.

9* The other comments we received can be sumraari'fted as follows:- (a) Elmbridge Borough The majority of coranants on our draft proposals were concerned with this district, particularly the proposed arrangements for the Walton and Weybridge area. The Chertsey and Walton Constituency Labour Party (supported by a petition bearing 157 signatures), three local branches of the Labour Party and four members of the public supported our proposals for the area. The Chertsey, Walton and Weybridge Liberal Association, Councillor Curran and a local resident welcomed our proposals as an improvement over the County Councilfs draft scheme but considered that it was desirable to avoid the splitting of polling districts and submitted identical alternative schemes which were based on a similar grouping of whole or part borough wards but which followed polling district boundaries wherever a ward was divided. The Borough Council, the Chertsey and Walton Conservative Association (who submitted their own alternative), Mr Geofrrey Pattie KP, Councillor Harman and nine members of the public objected to our proposals* The reasons for objecting included the fact that our proposals divided borough wards and polling districts and that they did not reflect local ties. Several objectors, among them the Borough Council, expressed a strong preference for the arrange- ments proposed by the County Council* The remaining comments concerned other divisions in the Borough. East Molesey Conservative Association and Esher Constituency Conservative Association urged that the existing Molesey and Esher divisions should be retained. The local residents1 association considered that Hinchley Wood ward should be placed in the same division as Long Ditton ward. A local resident also thought that a Claygate and Hinchley Wood division wag unlikely to provide a comfortable marriage* (b) Epsom and Ewell Borough The Borough Council, Epaom ?md bwell Constituency Liberal Association, County Councillor Davison and four residents1 associations supported our proposals for the borough. Epsom and Ewell District Labour Party questioned our proposals both on failure to take account of local ties and on standard of representation* Theyresubmitted their alternative scheme which provided for a different grouping of whole borough wards. Councillor Mrs Storer favoured the retention of the existing arrangements or failing that tho adoption of a scheme which had been proposed by the Borough Council at an earlier stage in this review. (c) I'iole Valley District The Leatherhead Society supported our proposed Leatherhead and Fetcham East division. (d) Runnymede Borough Addlestone Conservative Association welcomed our proposed Addlestone division. Chertsey and Walton Conservative Association, Chertsey Town Conservative -Association, Chertsey Chamber of Commerce, Mr Geoffrey Rattle MP and County Councillor Payne commented that our proposed Chertsey division was too small and suggested ways in which it could be enlarged. One of these suggestions concerning the transfer of Thorpe East polling district to Chertsey division was opposed by Mr Michael Grylls MP. (e ) Spelthorne Borough Spelthorne Conservative Association supported our draft proposals. Ihe Shepperton Residents1 Association objected to our proposed Shepperton, and Laleham and Shepperton Green divisions and requested that the two Shepperton borough wards be placed in the same division, (f) Tandridge District and Parleigh,and Parish Councils objected to the inclusion of their parishes in the proposed Warlin^hom division. Both Parish Councils

suggested alternative arrangements whereby their parish would be grouped with other rural parishes rather than with a largely urban area. Parish Council objected to the name of division and suggested that we should revert to the original druft scheme name 'Oxted and Limps field'• (6) Waverley District Elstead and Witley Parish Councils supported our proposals. Waverley District Council, Godaiming Town Council, the Fnrncombe and Godalming branch of the Famham Conservative and Unionist Association, Godaiming and District Chamber of Commerce and the lit Hon Maurice Mncmillan MP objected to our proposed Godaiming i-Iorth and Goda3.rn.ing South and Rural divisions. Mr Macmillan took the view that the two divisions were unbalanced since' Godaiming iJorth comprised the residential area of God aiming while Godalniing South nnd Rural comprised the commercial area and a number of parishes. He considered that a different grouping of town wards and parishes should be found. Waverley District Council and the three other objectors requested that the whole of the town of Godalming form one division while the parishes formed another. (h) Wpking Borough Woking Constituency Labour Party objected to our proposals for the borough and submitted a variant of the alternative scheme which they had previously put forward. The;/ considered this scheme to be better than our proposals both in terms of community of interest and standard of representation.

10. When we came to reassess our draft proposals we took account of all the comments we had received on them. Among those comments there were some requests that the issues raised should be argued before an Assistant Commissioner at a local meeting. We were satisfied, however, that we had sufficient information before us to reach a final decision on the arrangements for all parts of the county. We came to the following conclusions: (a) Klmbridfte Borough

Our droft proposals for this borough gave rise to considerable comment, particularly :in relation to the three Walton and Weybridge divisions. 'Ve noted however that there was a 1 ;;o conti nued oppo::>:i ti on to the proposed chan/.1;^:-; to the ex.i;.;t j ng arrangement.:; i n the area o (' the former urban di r.l.riot of"

Esher. Retention of the existing arrangements would have provided a significantly less even standard of representation than our draft proposals and there was no new evidence to suggest that we should reverse our former decision that this would not be acceptable. With regard to the Walton and

Weybridge area, much of the opposition stemmed from the view that it was undesirable and confusing to propose an electoral division boundary which followed neither a borough ward nor a polling district bound.Mry. Many of those objecting to our proposals supported the arrangements which had formed part of the County Council':; draft scheme. We therefore re-examined our proposals together with the draft, scheme and the alternative schemes which had been submitted. We noted that neither the draft scheme nor the alternative scheme suggested by the Chertsey and Walton Conservative Association produced a more even standard of representation than our proposals and that there was no clear indication that they had more regard for local ties and community interests,

The alternative scheme suggested by the Chertsey, Walton and Weybridgc

Liberal Association/ Councillor Curran and a local resident, however, was very similar to our draft proposals in terms of both standard of representation and grouping of communities. It met one of the main criticisms that had been levelled at our draft proposals in that it did not split polling districts.

Whilst we see no objection in principle to boundaries that divide polling districts, we accept that there are advantages of administrative convenience in avoiding them unless other considerations are overriding. This alternative scheme was, however, still open to the other major criticism that it did not follow ward boundaries completely. The provisions of the Local Government Act 1972 require us to have regard to these boundaries as we must to the desirability of fixing boundaries that will bo readily identifiable, and to any local ties that would be broken by any particular divisional boundary. These considerations are however subject to others, in particular the numerical balance between divisions. With this in mind we concluded that in this instance the balance of advantage lay with this alternative scheme rather than with the County Council's draft scheme.

(b) Epsom__nnd Ewell Borough

Our draft proposals produced a markedly more even standard of representation in the Borough than either the County Council's draft scheme or the alternatives which had been suggested. In addition, the draft scheme had attracted considerable opposition whereas our draft proposals were supported not only by various local organisations but also by the Borough Council, who had withdrawn their own proposals in favour of ours. Again, the principal objection by the County Council to our draft proposals was that they considered divisions should consist of whole borough wards wherever possible. For the reasons explained earlier we did not accept their objection as overriding and decided that we should adhere to our draft proposals.

(c) Runnymede Borougfc Our draft proposals in respect of this borough were identical with the County Council's draft scheme and the objections received were similar to those made in response to the draft scheme. We noted that the alternative suggestions which had been made to enlarge the Chertsey division had attracted opposition from other quarters. We concluded as the County Council had done before us, that there was no completely satisfactory arrangement for the Chertsey area. On balance we considered that our draft proposals which were acceptable to both the County Council and the Borough Council were to be preferred. (d) Spelthorne Borough We found that the possible alternative arrangements to moet the objection raised by the residents' association would have necessitated a complete reorganisation of all the divisions in the borough if a reasonable standard of representation were to be achieved. The resulting arrangements did not seem to us to offer any advantage over our proposals, which appeared to be generally acceptable* (e) Tandridae District We noted that the Parish Councils of Chelsham and flarleigh, and Tatsfield had not been able to agree on an alternative arrangement of divisions which would meet their wish to be included in a rural division. Rirthermore neither of the suggestions put forward would have secured the even standard of ' representation achieved by our draft proposals. We considered the objection raised by Limps field Parish Council but we were not convinced that there were sufficient grounds to change our original decision to rename Carted and Llmpsfield division as 'Cbcted1, (f) Waverley District Our draft proposals were identical with the County Council's draft scheme and most of the objections we received reiterated views expressed on that scheme. We noted that the proposal to place the whole of the town of Godalndng in a single division would result in that division being seriously under-represented and that there would be a lack of balance between urban and rural representation. We could see no satisfactory alternative arrangement. (g) Wokine Borough We considered the Woking Constituency Labour Party's alternative soheme for the whole borough but concluded that, in terms of standard of representation and community ties, it offered no appreciable improvement over our draft proposals which had not attracted opposition from any other quarter.

11. In the light of the conclusions set out in paragraph 10 above we decided to confirm our draft proposals as our final proposals for the county, subject to the

8 amendment to the Walton and Weybridge divisions of Klmbridge Borough indicated in paragraph 10(a) above*

12* Details of these final proposals are set out in Schedules 1 and 2 to this &s£t report and on the attached map* Schedule 1 gives the names of the electoral divisions. A detailed description of the boundaries of the proposed electoral divisions, as defined on the map, is set out in Schedule 2.

PUBLICATION 13. In accordance with Section 60(5)(b) of the Local Government Act 1972, a copy of the report and a copy of the map are being sent to the Surrey County Council and will be available for inspection at the Council's main offices. Copies of this report (without the map) are being sent to all those who received the consultation letter and to those who made comments* - L.S. Signed: NICHOLAS MORRISON (CHAIRMAN)

JOHN M RANKIN (DEPUTY CHAIRMAN)

PHYLLIS BOWDEN

TYRRELL BROCKBANK

G E CHERRY

D p HARRISON

R R THORNTON

LESLIE GRIMSHAW (Secretary) 10 July 1980

9F Appendix 1

DIVISION

Surrey County Council Whole County

BOROUGH OF ELHBRIDGE Elmbridge Borough Council Chertsey and Walton Conservative Association Walton on Thames Chertsey and Walton Constituency Labour Party Walton South and Oatlands Weybridge Branch of the Constituency Labour Party Weybridge Walton North Branch " " " " Walton South and Oatlands Branch " " Chertsey, Walton and Weybridge Liberal Association Mr Geoffrey Puttie, HP Councillor A K Curran Councillor A Harman Fourteen private individuals

East Molesey Conservative Association Esher and Molesey East Esher Constituency Conservative Association

Hinchley Wood Residents' Association Claygate and Hinchley One private individual Wood

BOROUGH OF KPSOM AHD EWELL Epsom and Ewell Borough Council Epsom and Ewell District Labour Party Epsom and Ewell Constituency Liberal Association Cuddington hesidents' Association

Ewell Court Residents1 Association Whole Borough West Ewell and Ruxley Residents' Association Nonsuch Park and District Residents' Association County Councillor H W Davison Councillor Mrs J Storer DIVISION

DISTRICT O.F MOLE VALLEY

The Leatherhead Society Leatherhead and Fetcham \ East

BOROUGH UF RUNNYMEDE Addlestone Conservative Association Addlestone

Chertsey and Walton Conservative Association Chertsey Town Conservative Association Chertsey Chamber of Commerce Chertsey Mr Michael Grylls MP Mr Geoffrey Pattie MP County councillor W Payne

BQRUUGH OF SPELTHORNE Spelthorne Conservative Association Whole Borough Shepperton Residents' Association Shepperton Laleham and Sheppterton Green

DISTRICT OF TANDRIDGE The Parish Council of Chelsharo and flarleigh Tatsfield Parish Council

Limpsfield Parish Council Oxted

DISTRICT OF WAVERLEY Waverley District Council Godaiming Town Council Godalnu.ng North Farncombe and Godaiming branch of the Farnham Godalming South and Division Conservative and Unionist Association Rural Godalming and District Chamber of Commerce The Rt Hon Maurice Macmillan, MP DIVISION Elstead Parish Council ) ) Whole District Witley Parish Council )

BOKuUGH OF Woking Constituency Labour Party Whole Borough SCHEDULE 1

COUNTY OF SUiiKEY : NAt-lES UP PROPOSED DIVISIONS

UF DIVISION

BQKOUuH OF Claygate and Hinchley Wood Cobhara and Oxshott Esher and Molesey East 1 Hersham Molesey West The Dittons Walton on Thames •Walton South and Oatlands Weybridge

BOROUGH OF EPSOM AND EWELL Epsom and Ewell North Epsom and Ewell North East Epsom and Evell South East Epsom and Ewell South West "Epsom and Ewell West

BOROUGH QF GUILDK3RD

Guildford East Guild ford North Guildford South Guildford West Horsleys Shalford Share Worplesdon DISTRICT jiil, J10UJL

Aahtead

Bookham and Fetcham West

Dorking Worth Dorking Rural

Dorking South Leatherhead and Fetcham East

BOROUGH OF PJSIGATE.AMD BAM3TEAD

Banstead East Banstead South Banstead West Horley East anri Salfords

Horley West

Reigate Central

Reigate East

Reigate North Reigate South

BOROUGH j)F RUffi-JYMSDE

Addlestono

Chertsoy

Kgham North

Egham South

Hew Haw

BOROUGH _OF SFELTHQRfE

Ashford East Ashford West Laleham and Shepperton Green Shepperton Staines Stanwell Sunbury BOROUGH OF SURREY HEATH

Camhorley East

•Camberley West

•Chobham and Bisley

Primley Green and Mytchett

Heatherside and Parkside

Windlesham

DISTiaCT OF TANDRIDGE

Caterham Hill Caterhara Valley Godstone •ttngfteld

•'Oxted ..Warlingham

DISTRICT OF WAVERI£Y Farnhara Central "Farnhara North -Farnham South 'Godaiming North "Godaiming South and Rural Hasloraere -Waverley East Waverley West

BOKQUGH OF WOKIHG Woking East Woking Worth Woking South Woking South East Woking South West Woking West SCHEDULE 2

COUNTY OF SURREY

DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED COUNTY ELECTORAL DIVISION BOUNDARIES

NOTE Where the boundary is described as following a road, railway, river, canal or similar feature, it should be deemed to follow the centre line of the feature unless otherwise stated.

ELMBRIDGE BOROUGH

CLAYGATE AND HINCHLEY WOOD ED

Elmbridge Borough Wards of:

Claygate Hinchley Wood

COBHAM AND OXSHOTT ED

Elmbridge Borough Wards of:

Cobham and Downside Cobham Fairmile Oxshott and Stoke D'Abernon

ESHER AND MOLESEY EAST ED

Elmbridge Borough Wards of:

Esher Molesey East

HERSHAM ED

Elmbridge Borough Wards of:

Hersham North Hersham South

MOLESEY WEST ED

Elmbridge Borough Wards of:

Molesey North Molesey South Tim DITTONS ED

Elmbridge Borough Ward:; of:

Long Ml;tort ThumcG Dikton Wet-it on Groon

WALTON-ON-THAMES ED

Elmbridge Borough Wards of:

Walton Ambleside Walton North

and that part of Walton Central Ward commencing at the junction of Kings Road and

the road known as Kings Close on the southeastern boundary of Walton Central Ward,

thence northwestwards along Kings Close to a point opposite the southeastern

boundary of No 1 Kings Close, fchcnco northeastward.-; to and along said southeastern

boundary to and northwestwards along the rc.ur boundary of said property and the

northwestern boundary of No 5 Kihgjj Close to the rear boundary of No 6 Kings Close,

thence northeastwards along said rear boundary and the rear boundary of No 7 Kings

Close to the rear boundary of No 60 Sidney Road, thence northwestwards along said .

rear boundary and the rear boundary of No 58 Sidney Road to and northeastwards

along the northwestern boundary of the last mentioned property to the rear boundary

of No 56 Sidney Road, thence northwestwards along said rear boundary and continuing

northwestwards along the rear boundaries of Nos 5*f to ^8 Sidney Road to the. south-

eastern boundary of No *f6 Sidney Road, thence southwestwards along said southeastern

boundary to the rear boundary of the last mentioned property, thence northwestwards

along said rear boundary and the rear boundaries of Nos Mt and k2 Sidney Road to

the southeastern boundary of the properties in Nelson Close, thence southwestwards

and northwestwards along the southeastern and southwestern property boundaries of

Nelson Close to the southeastern boundary of the Allotment Gardens, thence south- westwards, westwards and northwestwards along the southeastern, southern and south- western boundaries of said allotment gardens and in prolongation thereof to the southeastern boundary of No 17 Highfield Road, thence southwestwards along said southeastern boundary and in prolongation thereof, crossing the Path in a straight line, to the northwestern boundary of Elm Grove Recreation Ground, thence southwestwards along said northwestern boundary and continuing south- westwards along the southeastern boundaries of the Odeon Cinema and No 89b

High Street to High Street, thence northwestwards along said street to and generally westwards along Bridge Street to the northwestern boundary of the Borough, thence generally northeastwards along said northwestern borough boundary to the northernmost point of Walton Central Ward, thence southwest- wards, southeastwards and southwestwards along the eastern northeastern and southeastern boundaries of said ward to the point of commencement.

WALTON SOUTH AND OATLANDS ED

Elmbridge Borough Ward of:

Walton South and that part of Oatlands Park Ward commencing at the junction of Queens

Road and the London-Southampton railway thence generally northwestwards, northeastwards and southeastwards along the western, northwestern and eastern boundaries of Oatlands Park Ward to the London-Southampton railway, thence southwestwards along said railway to the point of commencement; and that part of Walton Central Ward not included in Walton-on-Thames ED. WEYBRIDGE ED

Elmbridge Borough Wards of:

St George's Hill Weybridge North Weybridge South

and that part of Oatlands Park Ward not included in Walton South and Oatlands

ED

EPSOM AND EWELL BOROUGH

EPSOM AND EWELL NORTH ED

Epsom and Ewell Borough Wards of:

Auriol Cuddington Ewell Court

EPSOM AND EWELL NORTH EAST ED

Epsom and Ewell Borough Wards of:

Nonsuch Stoneleigh

and that part of Ewell Ward commencing at a point where the Sutton-Leatherhead

railway crosses the northeastern boundary of the said ward, thence southwest-

wards along said railway to the southwestern boundary of the said ward,

thence generally southwestwards, northwestwards, northeastwards and south-

eastwards along the southwestern, northwestern and northeastern boundaries

of the said Ward to the point of commencement.

EPSOM AND EWELL SOUTH EAST ED

Epsom and Ewell Borough Wards of:

College Woodcote and that part of Ewell Ward not. included in Epsom' and Ewell North East ED EPSOM AND EWELL SOUTH WEST ED

Epsom and Ewell Borough Wards of:

Stamford Town and that part of Court Ward commencing at the point where the southwestern boundary of said ward meets the northwestern boundary of the Borough, thence northeastwards along said northwestern boundary to and generally south eastwards along the northeastern boundary of the said Ward to the westernmost point of No 11 Oakdale Road, thence southwestwards in a straight line from said point to NG Reference TQ 2065362692 being a point in the centre of the unnamed road running from St Ebba's Hospital, to Hook Road, thence generally southwestwards along said road to Hook Road, thence south- eastwards along said road to and northeastwards along Briane Road, crossing

Tonstall Road in a straight line, to the "accessway between No 1 Harvester Road and Nos 98-100 Tonstall Road, thence northeastwards along said accessway to a point opposite the rear boundary of the last mentioned properties, thence generally southeastwards, along said rear boundary and continuing southeast- wards along the rear boundaries of Nos 9^-56 Tonstall Road to a point opposite

the southern boundary of No 26'Bloomsbury Close, thence eastwards to and along said southern boundary to and southeastwards along the rear boundaries of Nos'28-36 Bloomsbury Close and in prolongation thereof to the accessway leading from Relko Court to Andover Close, thence northeastwards and south-

eastwards along said accessway to a point opposite the northwestern boundary

of No 60 Andover Close, thence northeastwards to and along said northwestern boundary and the northwestern boundary of No 58 Andover Close to the south western boundary of the Longmead County Secondary School Playing Field,

thence southeastwards, southwestwards and southeastwards along said south- western boundary and in prolongation thereof to Longmead Road thence southwestwards along said road to and southeastwards along Blenheim Road

to a point opposite the northwestern boundary of the parcel of land lying ( northwest of the Sea Cadets Hall, thenc^ southwestwards to and along said northwestern boundary and generally southeastwards along the southwestern boundary of the said parcel of land and continuing southeastwards along the fsouthwenhorri boundary of tho S

Ward to the point of commencement.

EPSOM AND EWELL WEST ED

Epsom and Ewell Borough Wards of:

Ruxley West Ewell and that part of Court Ward not included in Epsom and Ewell South West ED.

GUILDFORD BOROUGH

ASH ED

Guildford Borough Wards of:

Ash Ash Vale

GUILDFORD EAST ED

Guildford Borough Ward of: Merrow and Burpham and that part of Christchurch Ward commencing at the junction of the southern boundaries of Merrow and Burpham Ward and Christchurch Ward, thence westwards and northwestwards along the southern and southwestern boundaries of 7 . Christchurch Ward to the Guildford-Clandon Station railway, thence northeast- wards along said railway to the eastern boundary of Christchurch Ward, thence generally southeastwards along said boundary to the point of commence- ment.

GUILDFORD NORTH ED

Guildford Borough Wards of:

Stoke Stoughton and that part of Christchurch Ward not included in Guildford East ED.

GUILDFORD SOUTH ED

Guildford Borough Wards of: Friary and St Nicolas Holy Trinity

GUILEFORD WEST Guildford Borough Wards of:

Onslow Westborough

HORSLEYS ED

Guildford Borough Wards.of: Effingham Lovelace and that part of Clandon and Horsley Ward that consists of the parishes of: East Horsley West Horsley

SHALFORD ED .

Guildford Borough Wards of: Shalford The Pilgrims Tongham SHERE ED Guildford Borough Wards of:

Send Tillingbourne and that part of Clandon and Horsley Ward that consists of the parishes of: East Clandon West Clandon

WORPLESDON ED

Guildford Borough Wards of: Normandy Pirbright Worplesdon

MOLE VALLEY DISTRICT

ASHTEAD ED

Mole Valley District Wards of: Ashtead Common Ashtead Park Ashtead Village

BOOKHAM AND FETCHAM WEST ED Mole Valley District Wards of: Bookham North Bookham South Fetcham West

DORKING NORTH ED

Mole Valley District Wards of: Box Hill Brockham Dorking North-East Dorking North-West Leith Hill 1 DORKING RURAL ED

Mole Valley District Wards of:

Charlwood Holmwood and Beare Green Okewood Rural East Rural South

DORKING SOUTH ED Mole Valley District Wards of: Dorking South-East Dorking South-West North Holmwood Westcote

I£ATHERHEAD AND FETCHAM EAST ED

Mole Valley District Wards of:

Fetcham East Leatherhead North Leatherhead South

REIGATE AND BANSTEAD BOROUGH BANSEEAD EAST ED Reigate and Banstead Borough Wards of: Banstead Village Chipstead-Hooley and Woodmansterne

BANSTEAD SOUTH ED Reigate and Banstead Borough Wards of: Kingswood with Burgh Heath Preston Tadworth and Walton

BANSTEAD WEST ED Reigate and Banstead Borough Wards of; Nork Tattenhams .10

HORLEY EAST AND SALFORDS ED

Reigate and Banstead Borough Wards of:

Horley East Salfords and Sidlow

HORLEY WEST ED

Reigate and Banstead Borough Ward of:

Horley West

REIGATE CENTRAL ED

Reigate and Banstead Borough Wards of: Reigate Central Reigate South Central

REIGATE EAST ED Reigate and Banstead Borough Wards of: Reigate East Reigate North East

REIGATE NORTH ED

Reigate and Banstead Borough Wards of: Reigate North \ Reigate North Central

REIGATE SOUTH ED

Reigate and Banstead Borough Wards of: Reigate South East Reigate South West

RUNNYMEDE BOROUGH

ADDI£STONE ED

Runnymede Borough Wards of:

Addlestone Bourneside Addlestone North Addlestone St Paul's 11

CHERTSEY ED

Runnymede Borough Wards of: Chcrtsey Meads Chertcey St Ami's

EGIIAM NORTH ED Runnymede Borough Wards of:

Egham Englefield Greon East Englefield Green West

EGHAM SOUTH ED Runnymede Borough Wards of; Hythe Thorpe Virginia Water

NEW HAW ED

Runnymede Borough Wards of;

Foxhills New Haw Woodham

SPELTHORNE BOROUGH

ASHFORD EAST ED

Spelthorne Borough Wards of: Ashford Common Ashford East

ASHFORD WEST ED

Spelthorne Borough Wards of: Ashford North Ashford Town Ashford West 12

LALEHAM AND SHEPPERTON GREEN ED

Spclthorne Borough Wards of:

Laioham Shepperton Greon

SHEPPERTON ED

Spelthorne Borough Wards of:

Halliford and Sunbury West Shepperton Town

STAINES ED

Spelthorne Borough Wards of:

Staines East Staines Town

STANWELL ED

Spelthorne Borough Wards of:

Stanwell North Stanwell South The Moors

SUNBURY ED

Spelthorne Borough Wards of:

Sunbury Common Sunbury East

SURREY HEATH BOROUGH

CAMBERLEY EAST ED

Surrey Heath Borough Wards of:

Old Dean St Pauls Town

CAMBERLEY WEST ED Surrey Heath Borough Wards of: Frimley SI; Michael;; Watohott:;

CHOBHAM AND BISLEY ED

Surrey Heath Borough Wards of: Bisley Chobham West End

FRIMLEY GREEN AND MYTCHETT ED

Surrey Heath Borough Wards of:

Frimley Green Mytchett

HEATHERSIDE AND PARKSIDE ED Borough of Surrey Heath Wards of;

Heatherside Parkside

WINDLESHAM ED

Surrey Heath Borough Wards of: Bagshot Lightwater Windlesham

TANDRIDGE DISTRICT

CATERHAM HILL ED Tandridge District Wards of: Portley Queens Park West Way

CATERHAM. VALLEY ED

Tandridge District Wards of: Harostono Valley Whytelcnfe Wold bighorn

GODSTONE ED

Tandridge District Wards of:

Bletchingley Godstone Nutfield

LINGFIELD ED

Tandridge District Wards of: • •

Burcfcow and Home Dormane Lingfield and Crowhurst

OXTED ED . - . ,

Tandridge District Wards of:

Limpsfiold Oxted North and Tandridge Oxtod South

•4

WARLINGHAM ED

Tandridge District Wardr, of:

Chelsham and Farleigh, Tatsfield and Warlingham East Warlingham West

WAVERLEY DISTRICT

FAENHAM CENTRAL ED

Waverley District Wards of:

Farnham Castle Farnham Waverley FARNHAM NORTH ED

Waverley District Wards of:

Farnham Hale and Heath End Farnham Upper Hale Farnham Weybourne and Badshot Lea

FARNHAM SOUTH ED

Waverley District Wards of: Farnham Bourne Farnham Rowledge and Wrecclesham

GODAIflING NORTH ED Waverley District Wards of: Godalming North Godalming North East and South West Godalming North West

GODAIMING SOUTH AND RURAL ED

Waverley District Wards of: Alford and Dunsfold Bramley Busbridge, Hambledon and Hascombe Chiddingfold Godalming South East

HASLEMERE ED . Waverley District Wards of:

Haslemere North and Grayswood Haslemere South Hindhead Shottermill

WAVERIEY EAST ED

Waverley District Wards of: Blackheath and Wonersh Cranleigh East Cranleigh West Ewhurst Sharoley Green 16

WAVERLEY WEST ED

Waverley District Wards of:

Elstead, Pepor Harrow and Thurslcy Frenaham, Dockenfinld and Tilfo.rH Milford Witloy ' '..•-•

WOKING BOROUGH

WOKING EAST ED •

Woking Borough Wards of:

Byfleet West Byfleet

WOKING NORTH ED

Woking Borough Wards of: . "

Horsell East and Woodhara Horsell West Sheerwater '. J " •'••'.

WOKING SOUTH ED

Woking Borough Wards of:

Kingfield and Westfield Mayford and Sutton _ ; Mount Hermon West Old Woking

WOKING SOUTH-EAST ED

Woking Borough Wards of:

Central and Maybury Mount Herman East Pyrford

WOKING SOUTH-WEST ED ' '

Woking Borough Wards of:

Brookwood St John's and that part o'f Goldsworth Park Ward commencing at the juncture of the southern boundary of said ward and the BasingDtoke Canal, thence northeast- wards along said canal to the eastern boundary of Goldsworth Park Ward thence northeastwards, southeastwards, southwestwards and generally westwards along the eastern, southeastern and southern boundaries of said ward to the point of commencement.

WOKING WEST ED

Woking Borough Ward of:

Knaphill and that part of Goldsworth Park Ward not included in Woking South-Wcst ED.