DOCSLIB.ORG

West Malpais &

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
West Malpais & West Malpais & Hole-in-the-Wall El Malpais National Conservation Area Within the West Malpais Wilderness is a 6700-acre kipuka called Hole- in-the-Wall. “Kipuka” is a Hawaiian word meaning “island of vegetation surrounded by lava flow.” Bureau of Land Management Rio Puerco Field Office 100 Sun Ave. NE Pan American Bldg., Suite 330 Albuquerque, New Mexico 87109 505/761-8700 or El Malpais Ranger Station 505/280-2918 or www.blm.gov/new-mexico In case of emergency: BLM Rio Puerco Law Enforcement – 505/761-8700 Immediate Emergency – 911 24-hour Federal Law Enforcement – 800/637-9152 BLM/NM/GI-16-05-8000 Welcome to the West Malpais Wilderness/ vital nutrients for others, and opening up new niches in onto CR 42 and proceeding which life may begin anew. approximately 5.8 miles Hole-in-the-Wall! turning left (east) on the road As a result, species have adapted to the unique conditions to Big Tubes (NPS 300). From ooking for adventure? A hike into this rugged wilderness here. Park Road 300 take 301 off Lbrings wonderful opportunities as well as challenges for to the south. Park Road 301 the adventurous hiker. There is also considerable evidence of human activities forks many times but stay in the Hole-in-the-Wall. The ancestors of today’s native on it continuing to go south The area is remote, far from the roars of the highways and peoples, homesteaders and modern day ranchers have and east. (Be forewarned, this insistent dings of technology, and a person can be free to influenced this special area. is one of the roughest roads reconnect with themselves. You’ll in the NCA!) These roads begin to refresh as you hike through “A wilderness, in contrast with Now that this area is wilderness, it are minimally maintained rocky areas with little vegetation those areas where man and his own is protected for all to enjoy. but should be marked at each junction. You should see a and spot tracks from cougars or works dominate the landscape, is sign for Little Hole-in-the-Wall. Continue straight in for an see skittering lizards. As you hike hereby recognized as an area where Among other opportunities in the El additional 9 miles to the Cerro Encierro Trailhead. further into the Wilderness, you the earth and its community of life are Malpais NCA, is the West Malpais Widlerness. Within the West Malpais may look around you, shocked as untrammeled by man, where man himself Pointers and Precautions Wilderness an oasis of vegetation is the barren land becomes more Water is a scarce and precious resource in this arid country. is a visitor who does not remain.” housed and is known as the Hole-in- densely vegetated. You must carry with you all the water you need. Wilderness Act of 1964 the-Wall. The Hole-in-the-Wall is the largest islandlike depression in the The El Malpais National No mechanized EL Malpais NCA lava fields and over the years, moisture and Conservation Area (NCA) contains some of the most vehicles (mountain soil collected on some of the oldest lava to form this 6,000- dynamic and scenic landscape in New Mexico. El Malpais bikes included) may be acre park of ponderosa pine. is Spanish for “the badlands,” a description worthy of the driven past the posted area’s countless volcanic eruptions which sent rivers of wilderness boundary Near the northeast corner of the wilderness you will find molten rock and flying cinders over what is now a bleak into the wilderness. valley of three million years’ worth of hardened lava. Native yourself in a 6700-acre kipuka called Hole-in-the-Wall. “Kipuka” is a Hawaiian word meaning “island of vegetation American settlers probably witnessed the last of the It’s safer to let someone surrounded by lava flow.” This fertile ground, underlain by eruptions. Their former home is now a land of craters and know where you are the 700,000-year-old North Plains lava flows is inhabited by lava tubes, cinder cones and spatter cones, ice caves and going. pressure ridges, and a surprising amount of vegetation. numerous forms of life, surrounded and segregated from their original biotic communities by a sea of broken, jagged Wet weather conditions basalt. Many varieties of trees, shrubs, mammals, reptiles, grasses, can make roads fungi and other creatures make this wilderness their home. treacherous and These life forms interact Access impassable. Check with with and influence one The easier, fastest, and best a Ranger before you another, in this harsh, driving route to access the attempt to drive any of dry environment. For West Malpais Wilderness and the back roads within example, lichen slowly Hole-in-the-Wall is from the the NCA. breaks down rock and south end of the NCA off NM obtains nutrients from 117. From NM 117, proceed You can explore above and below ground lava features the stone. This process northwest on CR 42 for (but stay out of bat caves!). The West Malpais Wilderness provides new soil and approximately 2.1 miles. Take and Hole-in-the-Wall are places for a toehold for new plant the right fork to the north and you to savor solitude, encounter growth. Antelope, deer, travel about 5 miles to where some of the Earth’s geologic past, rabbits, and squirrels the road ends at the West and experience the solace and forage for these plants Malpais Wilderness trailhead. satisfaction that comes from and scarce water. exploring an area often overlooked Lightning-caused These areas can also be by others. wildfires sweep through accessed from the north by areas, destroying some turning south from NM 53 plants, while releasing .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Travel Summary
    Travel Summary – All Trips and Day Trips Retirement 2016-2020 Trips (28) • Relatives 2016-A (R16A), September 30-October 20, 2016, 21 days, 441 photos • Anza-Borrego Desert 2016-A (A16A), November 13-18, 2016, 6 days, 711 photos • Arizona 2017-A (A17A), March 19-24, 2017, 6 days, 692 photos • Utah 2017-A (U17A), April 8-23, 2017, 16 days, 2214 photos • Tonopah 2017-A (T17A), May 14-19, 2017, 6 days, 820 photos • Nevada 2017-A (N17A), June 25-28, 2017, 4 days, 515 photos • New Mexico 2017-A (M17A), July 13-26, 2017, 14 days, 1834 photos • Great Basin 2017-A (B17A), August 13-21, 2017, 9 days, 974 photos • Kanab 2017-A (K17A), August 27-29, 2017, 3 days, 172 photos • Fort Worth 2017-A (F17A), September 16-29, 2017, 14 days, 977 photos • Relatives 2017-A (R17A), October 7-27, 2017, 21 days, 861 photos • Arizona 2018-A (A18A), February 12-17, 2018, 6 days, 403 photos • Mojave Desert 2018-A (M18A), March 14-19, 2018, 6 days, 682 photos • Utah 2018-A (U18A), April 11-27, 2018, 17 days, 1684 photos • Europe 2018-A (E18A), June 27-July 25, 2018, 29 days, 3800 photos • Kanab 2018-A (K18A), August 6-8, 2018, 3 days, 28 photos • California 2018-A (C18A), September 5-15, 2018, 11 days, 913 photos • Relatives 2018-A (R18A), October 1-19, 2018, 19 days, 698 photos • Arizona 2019-A (A19A), February 18-20, 2019, 3 days, 127 photos • Texas 2019-A (T19A), March 18-April 1, 2019, 15 days, 973 photos • Death Valley 2019-A (D19A), April 4-5, 2019, 2 days, 177 photos • Utah 2019-A (U19A), April 19-May 3, 2019, 15 days, 1482 photos • Europe 2019-A (E19A), July
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Impact Reports (Firs) Are Prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for Standing Finance Committees of the NM Legislature
    Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance committees of the NM Legislature. The LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they are used for other purposes. Current FIRs (in HTML & Adobe PDF formats) are available on the NM Legislative Website (www.nmlegis.gov). Adobe PDF versions include all attachments, whereas HTML versions may not. Previously issued FIRs and attachments may be obtained from the LFC in Suite 101 of the State Capitol Building North. F I S C A L I M P A C T R E P O R T ORIGINAL DATE 02/07/13 SPONSOR Herrell/Martinez LAST UPDATED 02/18/13 HB 292 SHORT TITLE Transfer of Public Land Act SB ANALYST Weber REVENUE (dollars in thousands) Recurring Estimated Revenue Fund or Affected FY13 FY14 FY15 Nonrecurring (See Narrative) There (See Narrative) There may be additional may be additional Recurring General Fund revenue in future years. revenue in future years. (Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Revenue Decrease ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT (dollars in thousands) 3 Year Recurring or Fund FY13 FY14 FY15 Total Cost Nonrecurring Affected General Total $100.0 $100.0 $200.0 Recurring Fund (Parenthesis ( ) Indicate Expenditure Decreases) Duplicate to SB 404 SOURCES OF INFORMATION LFC Files Responses Received From Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) General Services Department (GSD) Economic Development Department (EDD) Department of Cultural Affairs (DCA) Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Department (EMNRD) State Land Office (SLO) Department of Transportation (DOT) Department of Finance and Administration (DFA) House Bill 292 – Page 2 SUMMARY Synopsis of Bill House Bill 292 (HB 292) is the Transfer of Public Lands Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1464 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1132
    § 1132 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 1464 Department and agency having jurisdiction of, and reports submitted to Congress regard- thereover immediately before its inclusion in ing pending additions, eliminations, or modi- the National Wilderness Preservation System fications. Maps, legal descriptions, and regula- unless otherwise provided by Act of Congress. tions pertaining to wilderness areas within No appropriation shall be available for the pay- their respective jurisdictions also shall be ment of expenses or salaries for the administra- available to the public in the offices of re- tion of the National Wilderness Preservation gional foresters, national forest supervisors, System as a separate unit nor shall any appro- priations be available for additional personnel and forest rangers. stated as being required solely for the purpose of managing or administering areas solely because (b) Review by Secretary of Agriculture of classi- they are included within the National Wilder- fications as primitive areas; Presidential rec- ness Preservation System. ommendations to Congress; approval of Con- (c) ‘‘Wilderness’’ defined gress; size of primitive areas; Gore Range-Ea- A wilderness, in contrast with those areas gles Nest Primitive Area, Colorado where man and his own works dominate the The Secretary of Agriculture shall, within ten landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where years after September 3, 1964, review, as to its the earth and its community of life are un- suitability or nonsuitability for preservation as trammeled by man, where man himself is a visi- wilderness, each area in the national forests tor who does not remain. An area of wilderness classified on September 3, 1964 by the Secretary is further defined to mean in this chapter an area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its of Agriculture or the Chief of the Forest Service primeval character and influence, without per- as ‘‘primitive’’ and report his findings to the manent improvements or human habitation, President.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 El Malpais National Conservation Area Business Plan 508 Compliant
    Draft El Malpais National Conservation Area Business Plan U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Rio Puerco Field Office August 2021 1 RECOMMENDATIONS, REVIEWS, and APPROVALS Prepared by: Jennifer Merino, Outdoor Recreation Planner, Date Rio Puerco Field Office Reviewed by: Elaine Lopez, Assistant Field Manager, Date Rio Puerco Field Office Approved By: Kymm Gresset, Field Manager, Date Rio Puerco Field Office This business plan was prepared by the Bureau of Land Management’s Rio Puerco Field Office pursuant to the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act of 2004 (16 U.S.C. 6801- 6814) and BLM recreation fee program policies. It establishes future management goals and priorities for the El Malpais National Conservation Area in the Rio Puerco Field Office. 2 Table of Contents Letter to the Reader………………………………………………………………………………………………………...5 1. Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 6 2. Background ..................................................................................................................................... 7 3. Authorities ................................................................................................................................... 9 Land Use Plan Guidance ............................................................................................................................ 9 4. Description of the Rio Puerco Field Office Recreation Program ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Can We Save the Wolf?
    www.nmwild.org By Stephen Capra It was 1998. After two decades of planning, environmental assessment, threats of litigation, and sometimes ran- corous public debate, something special was happening. Mexican wolves were once again free in the wilds of the Blue Range of Arizona and poised to return to the Gila country of New Mexico. It was a hopeful moment for the most imper- iled subspecies of gray wolf in North America—the Mexican gray wolf (Canis lupus baileyi.) Much like recovery efforts in the northern Rocky Mountains, where wolves had been released into Yellow- stone National Park and central Idaho, TRAGIC CONSEQUENCES: CAN WE SAVE THE WOLF? it seemed we had learned in the South- west to share our lands with native wild- life. Working with ranchers and rural communities, conservationists sensed a new respect for nature and a desire for ecological balance taking root after generations of abuse and slaughter. But unlike Yellowstone’s success, the fate of the Mexican lobo is far from certain. The story of Canis lupus baileyi is a complex and mostly frustrating tale of good intentions, an old West mentality, politics, and unsatisfactory results. Origi- nally, the Mexican wolf ranged from central Mexico to today’s U.S. Interstate 10 in Arizona and New Mexico. It was exterminated from the southwestern United States by the U.S. Bureau of Biological Survey. In 1950, the Bureau’s successor agency, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, launched a program in Mexico that eliminated almost all of its wolves by the mid-1970s. Such see CAN WE SAVE , pg.
    [Show full text]
  • Foundation Document El Malpais National Monument New Mexico September 2014 Foundation Document
    NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Foundation Document El Malpais National Monument New Mexico September 2014 Foundation Document To Gallup To Chaco Culture National Historical Park 605 CIBOLA NATIONAL FOREST MILAN 547 Exit 79 ACOMA INDIAN RESERVATION To Gallup San ta GRANTS LAGUNA Exit 81 Fe Z 50 49 Av INDIAN en U N 40 ue O RESERVATION N Y N A H C is I to r 480 ic CIBOLA R Exit 85 o u t e M 6 I San Rafael 6 N O U Z U N NATIONAL FOREST Northwest New Mexico T Visitor Center A C I o n 447 Exit 89 N t in e S n To Albuquerque t A 49 40 a g l u a 53 Exit 102 B To Zuni and Gallup O McCartys N I EL MALPAIS T F E o S r A Ri an ia C r 117 G Jos e e D e NATIONAL D I k i v R i d Acomita e S CONSERVATION A N C A A 50 T N AREA El Morro Y N O E 53 V N National Monument S 38 32 A L Bandera Crater Gallo Peak Ice Caves (private) El Malpais (NPS) Information Center C o n t Lava in e Cerro Bandera Crater n 42 ta 8372ft l El Malpais (BLM) 2552m Ranger Station D i El Calderon Area Twin Craters vid e Junction Cave N Lost Woman a Crater t El Calderon io MESA n a l Trailhead NEGRA C S Sandstone Bluffs Overlook E ce R n (closed at dusk) Cerro R ic I Zuni-Aco Big Tubes Area T m Rendija a O T S Tr ra Cerro a il il Americano D E J A S P E 23 ACOMA C E B Cerro O L Negro L I Acoma Pueblo Hoya Braided T Cerro de Cibola Cave EL MALPAIS NATIONAL MONUMENT A Information Hueco y C a A S w Cerro N y R Hoya Y B O E N y Cerro T r S RAMAH NAVAJO t Encierro A n W u La Ventana R O o c R Natural Arch C k R INDIAN c A a LL B A N F W s - r E E INDIAN RESERVATION
    [Show full text]
  • National Geographic's National Conservation Lands 15Th
    P ow ear Pt. Barr d B 5 ay Bellingham Ross Lake E ison Bay Harr PACIFIC NORT S HWES Cape Flattery t San Juan T N ra Islands AT i I LisburneCape N o t SAN JUAN ISLANDS ONAL S r t h S l o p e of CE P Ju N IC a NATIONAL MONUMENT T e F N 9058 ft KMt. Isto Cape Alava n R CANADA KCopper Butte n 61 m d A l . lvill 27 e a L B o e F I d F U.S. C u L 7135 ft t M o Central Arctic c o d R a 2175 m O K h i r l g Management o e r k k e O E Priest o a e 2 C Area G t d O 101 i L. e r K N l . A n S P S R l 95 as K i e r E a 93 Ma o ot Central Arctic a i p z a L i e l b Management KGlacier Pk. Lake E a 97 b W IS A 15 ue Mt. Olympus K l N r Area STEESE 10541 ft D S Chelan m o CANADA 7965 ft i 89 Cape Prince NATIONAL 3213 m C 2 u uk 2428 m 2 u n k Franklin D. l L Lake Elwell d CONSERVATION U.S. s A of Wales u r R R Roosevelt o K oy AREA Y Bureau of Land Management e C h K u L lle N I ei h AT 191 Seward k Lake 2 Or s ION IC TRAIL 2 o A d R 395 Pen i A O L.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1480 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1113 (Pub
    § 1113 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 1480 (Pub. L. 88–363, § 13, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.) ment of expenses or salaries for the administra- tion of the National Wilderness Preservation § 1113. Authorization of appropriations System as a separate unit nor shall any appro- There are hereby authorized to be appro- priations be available for additional personnel priated to the Department of the Interior with- stated as being required solely for the purpose of out fiscal year limitation such sums as may be managing or administering areas solely because necessary for the purposes of this chapter and they are included within the National Wilder- the agreement with the Government of Canada ness Preservation System. signed January 22, 1964, article 11 of which pro- (c) ‘‘Wilderness’’ defined vides that the Governments of the United States A wilderness, in contrast with those areas and Canada shall share equally the costs of de- where man and his own works dominate the veloping and the annual cost of operating and landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where maintaining the Roosevelt Campobello Inter- the earth and its community of life are un- national Park. trammeled by man, where man himself is a visi- (Pub. L. 88–363, § 14, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.) tor who does not remain. An area of wilderness is further defined to mean in this chapter an CHAPTER 23—NATIONAL WILDERNESS area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its PRESERVATION SYSTEM primeval character and influence, without per- manent improvements or human habitation, Sec. which is protected and managed so as to pre- 1131.
    [Show full text]
  • American Indian Sacred Sites on Federal Public Lands: Resolving Conflicts Between Religious Use and Multiple Use at El Malpais National Monument Ann M
    American Indian Law Review Volume 19 | Number 1 1-1-1994 American Indian Sacred Sites on Federal Public Lands: Resolving Conflicts Between Religious Use and Multiple Use at El Malpais National Monument Ann M. Hooker Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/ailr Part of the Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons Recommended Citation Ann M. Hooker, American Indian Sacred Sites on Federal Public Lands: Resolving Conflicts Between Religious Use and Multiple Use at El Malpais National Monument, 19 Am. Indian L. Rev. 133 (1994), https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/ailr/vol19/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in American Indian Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AMERICAN INDIAN SACRED SITES ON FEDERAL PUBLIC LANDS: RESOLVING CONFLICTS BETWEEN RELIGIOUS USE AND MULTIPLE USE AT EL MALPAIS NATIONAL MONUMENT Ann M. Hooker* L Background A. Introduction American Indians are beginning to reassert their right to freely express their religious beliefs despite past European American attempts to suppress them.' However, misunderstandings and conflicts persist in part because of basic differences between American Indian and European American religious beliefs. These differences become apparent especially when sacred mountains, lakes, forest groves, caves and other natural sites located on federal land are threatened with development for mining, flood control, recreation, logging, and other intensive activities and Native Americans attempt to protect them for religious purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wilderness Act of 1964
    The Wilderness Act of 1964 Source: US House of Representatives Office of the Law This is the 1964 act that started it all Revision Counsel website at and created the first designated http://uscode.house.gov/download/ascii.shtml wilderness in the US and Nevada. This version, updated January 2, 2006, includes a list of all wilderness designated before that date. The list does not mention designations made by the December 2006 White Pine County bill. -CITE- 16 USC CHAPTER 23 - NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM 01/02/2006 -EXPCITE- TITLE 16 - CONSERVATION CHAPTER 23 - NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM -HEAD- CHAPTER 23 - NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM -MISC1- Sec. 1131. National Wilderness Preservation System. (a) Establishment; Congressional declaration of policy; wilderness areas; administration for public use and enjoyment, protection, preservation, and gathering and dissemination of information; provisions for designation as wilderness areas. (b) Management of area included in System; appropriations. (c) "Wilderness" defined. 1132. Extent of System. (a) Designation of wilderness areas; filing of maps and descriptions with Congressional committees; correction of errors; public records; availability of records in regional offices. (b) Review by Secretary of Agriculture of classifications as primitive areas; Presidential recommendations to Congress; approval of Congress; size of primitive areas; Gore Range-Eagles Nest Primitive Area, Colorado. (c) Review by Secretary of the Interior of roadless areas of national park system and national wildlife refuges and game ranges and suitability of areas for preservation as wilderness; authority of Secretary of the Interior to maintain roadless areas in national park system unaffected. (d) Conditions precedent to administrative recommendations of suitability of areas for preservation as wilderness; publication in Federal Register; public hearings; views of State, county, and Federal officials; submission of views to Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • Northwest New Mexico Southwest New Mexico Northeast New Mexico
    S1M6N C A N Y ON REC REATI ON ARE A WE S T MALPAIS WILDERNESS Northeast New Mexico The Information Corner This sandstone canyon offers dispersed camping, hiking, and The West Malpais Wilderness encompasses grassland, pinyon/ bird watching. The San Juan River provides excellent fishing juniper woodland, Ponderosa pine stands, and lava fields. A TAOS FIELD OFFICE 575-758-8851 PUBLIC LANDS ARE YOUR LANDS. Wheth er visitin g on foot o r h orseback, at the mouth of the canyon. Overlooking the area, the partially designated trail leads into Hole-in-the-Wall, an area surrounded, by b icycle or motor vehicle, we ask you to tread lightly, an d once you reach your www.blm.gov/nm/taos restored Sim6n Ruin, a single-room Navajo Pueblito, is built but not covered, by lava flows. The Wilderness is located destination, practice outdoo r skills tha t leave no trace. on top of a 20-foot-tall boulder. The area has a restroom, within El Malpais NCA. DIA BLO CANYO N RECR E ATION AREA RULES AND GUI DEL NES are in place to en sure your safety, the continu ed h ealth picnic tables, and campfire ri ngs. However, there is no This area near Santa Fe is a very popular destination for WHITE RIDGE BIKE TRAILS of the land, and th at visitor enjoys a q ua lity exp erience . Breaking th e rules drinking water or electricity. its rock climbing opportunities. A 2-mile route through the e~ery The bi ke trails cross a landscape of spectacular beauty and canyon takes you to the Rio Grande.
    [Show full text]
  • Kiowa National Grasslands Draft Wilderness Evaluation Report
    Kiowa National Grasslands Draft Wilderness Evaluation Report Canadian River Potential Wilderness Area PW-03-03-01G October 24, 2007 This draft potential wilderness evaluation report is divided into three parts: capability, availability, and need. Capability and availability are intended to be objective evaluations of existing conditions in the Canadian River Potential Wilderness Area. The most important area of focus for public comment is the “need” evaluation. The intent of this part of the evaluation is to consider if the Canadian River fits into the National Wilderness Preservation System at the regional level. This report offers data that helps us understand different sources that might generate need; ultimately, however, need for wilderness is generated by public demand. Therefore, public input is an essential component of this part of the wilderness evaluation. We would like your feedback on this draft report - if we have missed an important detail or you would like to share your comments or other input, please contact us (our contact information can be found on the last page of this report). DRAFT 10/24/2007 Table of Contents Introduction ...............................................................................2 Area Overview............................................................................2 Wilderness Capability ..................................................................4 Availability for Wilderness ............................................................6 Need for Wilderness ....................................................................8
    [Show full text]