DOCSLIB.ORG

Abstracts Book

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ICPEP-4 AbstractsAbstracts Fourth International Conference on Plants & Environmental Pollution 8-11 December, 2010 Publication Committee Dr. Nandita Singh (Convener) Dr. P.K. Shirke Dr. Vivek Pandey Dr. Pankaj K. Srivastava Mr. Soumit K. Behera Ms. Sarah Jamil Dr. Abhilash P.C. Ms. Deepika Sharma Ms. Mugdha Srivastava Ms. Vandana Singh Ms. Anshita Raj Ms. Anita Dube Mr. Dilip Chakraborty Preface A host of urgent issues would fill their agenda, when world scientists and academia from different nations meet in Lucknow for the “Fourth International Conference on Plants and Environmental Pollution” (ICPEP-4). Among the pressing problems to be debated would be global climate change, freshwater, dwindling forests, biodiversity losses, GM food, emergent ecological disturbances on plants, environmental issues and other factors in environment and plant relation. This “ABSTRACT BOOK' is a compilation of five hundred forty-nine abstracts on different environmental aspects, from renowned scientists having long working experience in their corresponding field of expertise. The volume elucidates the plant-pollutant relationship in a manner that defines not only the drastic effects of pollutants on plants but concomitantly highlights the hitherto less focused areas namely phytotoxicity, phytoremediation and GM Food, Waste/water management, stress tolerant bioaesthetic development, thus concentrating more on plant than the pollutant. The abstracts included in this volume are those, which were received within prescribed date and found suitable for publication. All abstracts were peer-reviewed for acceptance and then partitioned in different sessions for Oral and Poster presentation. Many abstracts were not in desired formats as well as were long. Abridgement of such abstracts has been done with care to include significant points. Late abstracts have been printed but un- indexed and are appended. The basic purpose of this abstract book is to evaluate, identify the knowledge gaps and provide direction for future research areas of environmental problems and consequent changes and to develop desired management protocols. We express our deep sense of gratitude to Dr. C.S. Nautiyal, Director NBRI and Dr. K.C. Gupta, Director IITR, for their moral and material support. We thank Drs., Dr. P. Nath, D.V. Amla, B.P. Singh, K.J. Ahmad, S.C. Sharma and P. Chandra for their encouragement and valuable suggestions to structure this book. We are indebted to our contributors who despite their various commitments acceded to our request to share their valuable expertise. Thanks are due to the Scientific Program Committee for categorizing the abstracts and editing them. We are also thankful to staff of Eco-auditing Group for their co-operation in various ways. We are also thankful to the various sponsoring agencies for financial support, which made this publication successful. The publication plan finally crystallized through the efforts of M/S Maruti Scanners and their team, we sincerely thank all these people. - Publication Committee ICPEP-4 Scientific Programme Committee Chairman Prof. C.K. Varshney Members Dr. R.D. Tripathi (Convener) Prof. Madhoolika Agrawal Prof. M. Iqbal Dr. Nandita Singh Dr. U.N. Rai Dr. Sarita Sinha Dr. S.N. Singh Dr. Kamla Kulshreshtha Dr. M.R. Suseela Dr. Soumit K. Behera Dr. Pankaj Kumar Srivastava Dr. Anjum Farooqui Dr. Seshu Lavania Dr. Vivek Pandey Dr. Shekhar Mallick Dr. Prabodh Trivedi Dr. P.K. Singh Dr. Devashish Chakrabarty Dr. D.K. Gupta (Spain) CONTENTS Keynote Lectures i Session SI Climate Change 1 Session SII Environment and Biodiversity 23 Session SIII Environmental Biotechnology 49 Session SIV Plant Response to 62 Environmental Pollution Session SV Environmental Impact Assessment 100 Session SVI Bioindication and Bioremediation 119 Session SVII Plant Microbe Interaction 144 Session SVIII Waste/Water Management 157 Session SIX Environmental Issues 171 Late Abstracts 204 Author Index 206 Keynote Lectures --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ABSTRACTS i K-1 K-2 Impact of Climate Change on Biodiversity with Agricultural Air Quality: Research, Policy, and Special Reference to Medicinal Plants Regulations P. Pushpangadan*, Vipin Mohan Dan and V. George Viney P. Aneja Amity Institute for Herbal and Biotech Products Development Department of Marine, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences, North (AIHBPD), 3, Ravi Nagar, Peroorkada P.O., Thiruvananthapuram – Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8208, U.S.A., Email: 695005, Kerala, INDIA, E-mail:[email protected] [email protected] Climate change and its potential future threats on Agricultural emissions produce significant local and environment have raised the concern of scientists across regional impacts, such as odor, Particulate Matter (PM) globe. Variation in climate conditions has deep impact on the exposure, eutrophication, acidification, and exposure to production of secondary metabolites in plants. Research toxics, and pathogens. Agricultural emissions also studies have brought into light that genomic expression of contribute to the global problems caused by greenhouse gas plants can be affected by such variation resulting in loss of emissions. Agricultural emissions are variable in space and secondary metabolites of human interest. Scientific time and in how they interact within the various processes evidence is mounting proving that climate change is affecting and media effected. Most important in the US are ammonia vegetation pattern, phenology and distribution. These (where agriculture accounts for ~90% of total emissions), evidences seem to be of less importance at first sight, but it is reduced sulfur (unquantified), PM2.5 (~16%), PM10 (~18%), nature's warning signal for future challenges for species methane (29%), nitrous oxide (72%); and odor and emissions survival. These disturbances in seasonal cues has shown of pathogens (both unquantified). Agriculture also striking variation in phenological events like time of plants consumes fossil fuels for fertilizer production and farm bud burst, initial leafing and flowering, fruiting events, time operations, thus emitting carbon dioxide (CO2), oxides of of seed/fruit dispersal. Studies reveal that climate change is nitrogen (NOx), sulfur oxides (SOx) and particulates. Current forcing plants to migrate. Plants' ranges show movement research priorities include the quantification of point and towards poles and higher elevation in an attempt to restore non-point sources, the biosphere-atmosphere exchange of optimal growing conditions. Computer model programs ammonia, reduced sulfur compounds, volatile organic predict that “range” shift of plants will gain acceleration in compounds, greenhouse gases, odor and pathogens, the future due to continued climate changes. This migration of quantification of landscape processes, and the primary and plants in hunt for appropriate growing conditions may secondary emissions of PM. Although European eventually lead to extinction of many valuable medicinal policymakers have made progress in controlling these plant species. Recent years have witnessed extreme weather emissions, regulations in the United States remain events like storms, droughts and floods with more prevalence inadequate. and intensity. Global warming, human activities and other Key words: Agricultural air quality, Carbon dioxide (CO2), Oxides factors will tend to increase the occurrence of these events in of nitrogen (NO ), Sulfur oxides, Research, Policy, Regulations future. Reports from many parts of the world stand tall x voicing the fact that these extreme weather events is adversely affecting harvesters' and cultivator's requirements and condition to grow/collect medicinal plant species. If these climate impacts continue to grow uncontrolled, then the very plants that helped in evolution of modern human civilization may become extinct or will be devoid of its nutritional/medicinal qualities thereby putting in hold the well being of our future generation in jeopardy. Key words: Climate change, global warming, medicinal plants, secondary metabolites, phenology, genomic expression Session SI Climate Change --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ABSTRACTS 1 SI/L-1 hence, a rational strategy to sequester C must consider all the Role of Shelterbelts in Carbon Sequestration and components of the terrestrial ecosystem. Single tree species Climate Change of Dryland Ecosystems cannot be considered in isolation from other plant species or from soil because of the interactions and interdependencies 1 2 H. Shivanna * and P. Surendra among species in an ecosystem. Likewise, soil management 1 Department of Forest Biology and Tree Improvement, Forestry cannot be separated from plant productivity. Thus a study of Collage, Sirsi, District Uttara Kannada, Karnataka, INDIA, Email: 2 integrative strategy element-ecosystem dynamics is [email protected]; Agricultural Research Station, Sirsi, necessary. Karnataka, INDIA, Email: [email protected] Key words: C-sequestration, Forestry mitigation, Shelterbelt species Forests figure prominently in the climate change negotiations under way in the United Nations Framework SI/L-2 Convention on Climate Change. Forests, in both Advances in Air Pollution and Climate Change industrialized and developing countries are being singled out Impacts on Forests
Recommended publications
  • SNH Commissioned Report 449B: Bryological Assessment For

    SNH Commissioned Report 449B: Bryological Assessment For

    Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 449b Bryological assessment for hydroelectric schemes in the West Highlands (2nd edition) COMMISSIONED REPORT Commissioned Report No. 449b Bryological assessment for hydroelectric schemes in the West Highlands (2nd edition) For further information on this report please contact: Dr David Genney Policy & Advice Officer - Bryophytes, Fungi and Lichens Scottish Natural Heritage Great Glen House Leachkin Road Inverness, IV3 8NW Telephone: 01463 725000 Email: [email protected] This report should be quoted as: Averis, A.B.G., Genney, D.R., Hodgetts, N.G., Rothero, G.P. & Bainbridge, I.P. (2012). Bryological assessment for hydroelectric schemes in the West Highlands – 2nd edition. Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No.449b This report, or any part of it, should not be reproduced without the permission of Scottish Natural Heritage. This permission will not be withheld unreasonably. The views expressed by the author(s) of this report should not be taken as the views and policies of Scottish Natural Heritage. © Scottish Natural Heritage 2012. COMMISSIONED REPORT Summary Bryological assessment for hydroelectric schemes in the West Highlands – 2nd edition Commissioned Report No.: Report No. 449b Project No.: 10494 Contractor: A.B.G. Averis Year of publication: 2012 Background Proposals for run-of-river hydroelectric schemes are being submitted each year, but developers and planning consultees are often unclear about when to commission a bryophyte survey as part of the information submitted in a planning application. This project was commissioned by SNH to provide a means of assessing the bryological importance and/or potential of watercourses. This will help to clarify whether a survey is needed for any particular hydroelectric proposal.
  • A Revised Red List of Bryophytes in Britain

    A Revised Red List of Bryophytes in Britain

    ConservationNews Revised Red List distinguished from Extinct. This Red List uses Extinct in the Wild (EW) – a taxon is Extinct version 3.1 of the categories and criteria (IUCN, in the Wild when it is known to survive only in A revised Red List of 2001), along with guidelines produced to assist cultivation or as a naturalized population well with their interpretation and use (IUCN, 2006, outside the past range. There are no taxa in this 2008), further guidelines for using the system category in the British bryophyte flora. bryophytes in Britain at a regional level (IUCN, 2003), and specific Regionally Extinct (RE) – a taxon is regarded guidelines for applying the system to bryophytes as Regionally Extinct in Britain if there are no (Hallingbäck et al., 1995). post-1979 records and all known localities have Conservation OfficerNick Hodgetts presents the latest revised Red List for How these categories and criteria have been been visited and surveyed without success, or interpreted and applied to the British bryophyte if colonies recorded post-1979 are known to bryophytes in Britain. Dumortiera hirsuta in north Cornwall. Ian Atherton flora is summarized below, but anyone interested have disappeared. It should be appreciated that in looking into them in more depth should regional ‘extinction’ for bryophytes is sometimes he first published Red List of et al. (2001) and Preston (2010), varieties and consult the original IUCN documents, which less final than for other, more conspicuous bryophytes in Britain was produced subspecies have been disregarded. are available on the IUCN website (www. organisms. This may be because bryophytes are in 2001 as part of a Red Data Book 1980 has been chosen as the cut-off year to iucnredlist.org/technical-documents/categories- easily overlooked, or because their very efficient for bryophytes (Church et al., 2001).
  • Their Botany, Essential Oils and Uses 6.86 MB

    Their Botany, Essential Oils and Uses 6.86 MB

    MELALEUCAS THEIR BOTANY, ESSENTIAL OILS AND USES Joseph J. Brophy, Lyndley A. Craven and John C. Doran MELALEUCAS THEIR BOTANY, ESSENTIAL OILS AND USES Joseph J. Brophy School of Chemistry, University of New South Wales Lyndley A. Craven Australian National Herbarium, CSIRO Plant Industry John C. Doran Australian Tree Seed Centre, CSIRO Plant Industry 2013 The Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) was established in June 1982 by an Act of the Australian Parliament. ACIAR operates as part of Australia's international development cooperation program, with a mission to achieve more productive and sustainable agricultural systems, for the benefit of developing countries and Australia. It commissions collaborative research between Australian and developing-country researchers in areas where Australia has special research competence. It also administers Australia's contribution to the International Agricultural Research Centres. Where trade names are used this constitutes neither endorsement of nor discrimination against any product by ACIAR. ACIAR MONOGRAPH SERIES This series contains the results of original research supported by ACIAR, or material deemed relevant to ACIAR’s research and development objectives. The series is distributed internationally, with an emphasis on developing countries. © Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) 2013 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from ACIAR, GPO Box 1571, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia, [email protected] Brophy J.J., Craven L.A. and Doran J.C. 2013. Melaleucas: their botany, essential oils and uses. ACIAR Monograph No. 156. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research: Canberra.
  • Forests &Water

    Forests &Water

    FORESTS &WATER GUIDELINES FOURTH EDITION FORESTS &WATER GUIDELINES FOURTH EDITION Forestry Commission, Edinburgh © Crown Copyright 2003 Applications for reproduction of any part of these Guidelines should be addressed to: HMSO, Licensing Division, St Clements House, 2–16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ. First published in 1988 by the Forestry Commission, 231 Corstorphine Road, Edinburgh EH12 7AT. Second edition 1991 Third edition 1993, reprinted with amendments in 2000. ISBN 0 85538 615 0 FORESTRY COMMISSION (2003). Forests & Water Guidelines. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh. i–vi + 1–66pp. Keywords: Best management practice, Diffuse pollution, Forest management, Freshwater environment, Water quality, Water supply. Printed in the United Kingdom on Robert Horne Hello Matt. FCGL002/FG(ECD)/NMS-5K/DEC03 Enquiries relating to this publication should be addressed to: Forestry Group Forestry Commission 231 Corstorphine Road Edinburgh EH12 7AT Tel: 0131 334 0303 Fax: 0131 316 4344 Email: [email protected] www.forestry.gov.uk/sustainableforestry or, in Northern Ireland, to: Forest Service HQ Dundonald House Upper Newtownards Road Belfast BT4 3SB Tel: 02890 524821 Fax: 02890 524570 Email: [email protected] www.forestserviceni.gov.uk ii FORESTS & WATER GUIDELINES FOREWORD he Forests & Water Guidelines last underwent major revision in 1993; they were reprinted with amendments to administrative details and legislation in T 2000. Ten years have passed since the last substantial review, therefore it was thought timely to update the Guidelines so that they continue to reflect the most recent research and experience. Forestry is a devolved area leading to the development of national agendas. In parallel with developments in the forestry sector, regulation of many operations associated with forest planning and management has also reflected national concerns.
  • A Revised List of Nationally Rare Bryophytes

    A Revised List of Nationally Rare Bryophytes

    ConservationNews Revised list of nationally rare bryophytes v Timmia megapolitana. Ron Porley Committee, revises the list of nationally rare Table 1. Species now recorded in more than 15 10-km squares since 1950 species. It is a companion to the earlier revision A revised of scarce species (Preston, 2006) which provides H, hornwort; L, liverwort; M, moss. more background to the use of these terms. Atlas total Current total % of Atlas total The starting point for this revision is the list of nationally rare bryophyte species and subspecies H Phaeoceros carolinianus 4 17 425 list of L Barbilophozia kunzeana 10 17 170 which can be extracted from the spreadsheet of Conservation Designations for UK taxa on the L Fossombronia fimbriata 10 17 170 nationally Joint Nature Conservation Committee’s (JNCC) L Leiocolea fitzgeraldiae – 22 – website (www.jncc.gov.uk). I have brought the L Leiocolea gillmanii 13 18 138 taxonomy into line with that of the new Census L Lophozia perssonii 12 23 192 rare Catalogue (Hill et al., 2008), and updated the L Nardia breidleri 11 20 182 list to include newly discovered taxa and new L Scapania curta 15 16 107 10-km square records. The 10-km square totals L Scapania paludicola 4 19 475 bryophytes are based on records made from Britain (v.-cc. L Scapania paludosa 14 22 157 1–112) from 1950 onwards. M Bryum gemmilucens 10 20 200 The changes to the list are summarized below M Bryum knowltonii 13 19 146 and a complete new list of nationally rare species Chris Preston presents a M Bryum kunzei 8 16 200 then follows.
  • Pohlia-Arten Der Schweiz Bestimmungsschlüssel Für Sterile Pflanzen

    Pohlia-Arten Der Schweiz Bestimmungsschlüssel Für Sterile Pflanzen

    Pohlia-Arten der Schweiz Bestimmungsschlüssel für sterile Pflanzen zusammengestellt von Heiner Lenzin am 16. Januar 2019 nach dem Bestimmungsschlüssel von Gisela Nordhorn-Richter (1986) und den Unterlagen von Frank Müller für den Kurs vom 24./25.11.2018 (zusammengestellt aus den Quellen: Guerra 2007, Ignatov & Ignatova 2003, Köckinger in Swissbryophytes.ch, Köckinger et al. 2005, Liu et al. 2018, Meinunger & Schröder 2007, Nordhorn-Richter 1982, Nyholm 1993, Rothero 2014, Suarez et al. 2011, Shaw 1981, 1982, Shaw 2014 in Flora of North America 28, Smith 2004, Warnstorf 1906) und unter Verwendung von Nebel (2001). à s. Literaturverzeichnis Achtung: Schlüssel ohne Pohlia atropurpurea (Skandinavien, Russland), P. bolanderi (LESQ.) BROTH. (Spanien, Portugal, Madeira), P. scotica CRUNDW. (Schottland) und P. erecta LINDB. (Finnland, Norwegen, Schweden) 1. Pflanzen mit Bulbillen in den Achseln der Blättchen. ................................................. 2 – Pflanzen ohne Bulbillen in den Achseln der Blättchen. ............................................... 15 2. Bulbillen meist einzeln in den Achseln der Blättchen (selten mehr als 3), ei- bis kegelförmig, grün oder rot, gelb-orange bis schwarz, oft > 500 µm gross. ................. 3 – Mehr als eine Bulbille in den Achseln der Blättchen, z. T. an der Stämmchenspitze gehäuft, eiförmig oder länglich bis wurmförmig, grün, gelb-orange bis rot oder bräunlich, 50–400(–500) µm gross, die wurmförmigen schmal und oft viel länger werdend. ....................................................................................................................... 6 3. Blättchen der Bulbillen klein und unscheinbar, an der Spitze der Bulbillen stark zusammengezogen („Krönchen“) P. filum (SCHIMP.) MART. -- Faden-Pohlmoos – Pflanzen bis 5 cm hoch. Bulbillen gelb-orange, selten rot, im Alter schwarz werdend, dann glänzend; 300–600 µm lang. Die Blättchen der sterilen Pflanzen gerade, auch trocken dem Stämmchen eng anliegend, der Pflanze oft ein fadenförmiges Aussehen gebend.
  • List of UK BAP Priority Non-Vascular Plant Species (2007)

    List of UK BAP Priority Non-Vascular Plant Species (2007)

    UK Biodiversity Action Plan List of UK BAP Priority Non-Vascular Plant Species (2007) For more information about the UK Biodiversity Action Plan (UK BAP) visit https://jncc.gov.uk/our-work/uk-bap/ List of UK BAP Priority Non-Vascular Plant Species (2007) A list of UK BAP priority non-vascular plant species, created between 1995 and 1999, and subsequently updated in response to the Species and Habitats Review Report, published in 2007, is provided in the table below. The table also provides details of the species' occurrences in the four UK countries, and describes whether the species was an 'original' species (on the original list created between 1995 and 1999), or was added following the 2007 review. All original species were provided with Species Action Plans (SAPs), species statements, or are included within grouped plans or statements, whereas there are no published plans for the species added in 2007. Scientific names and commonly used synonyms derive from the Nameserver facility of the UK Species Dictionary, which is managed by the Natural History Museum. Scientific name Common Taxon England Scotland Wales Northern Original UK name Ireland BAP species? Acaulon triquetrum Triangular bryophyte Y N N N Yes – SAP Pygmy-moss Acrobolbus wilsonii Wilson's bryophyte N Y N N Yes – SAP Pouchwort Adelanthus Lindenberg's bryophyte N Y N N Yes – SAP lindenbergianus Featherwort Anastrophyllum Joergensen's bryophyte N Y N N joergensenii Notchwort Andreaea nivalis Snow Rock- bryophyte N Y N N moss Anomodon Long-leaved bryophyte Y Y Y N longifolius
  • Vegetation Survey of Batavia Downs, Cape York Peninsula

    Vegetation Survey of Batavia Downs, Cape York Peninsula

    QR91003 Vegetation survey of Batavia Downs Cape York Peninsula V. J. Neldner, J. R. Clarkson Botany Branch Department of Primary Industries & Brisbane Queensland Government Technical Report This report is a scanned copy and some detail may be illegible or lost. Before acting on any information, readers are strongly advised to ensure that numerals, percentages and details are correct. This report is intended to provide information only on the subject under review. There are limitations inherent in land resource studies, such as accuracy in relation to map scale and assumptions regarding socio-economic factors for land evaluation. Before acting on the information conveyed in this report, readers should ensure that they have received adequate professional information and advice specific to their enquiry. While all care has been taken in the preparation of this report neither the Queensland Government nor its officers or staff accepts any responsibility for any loss or damage that may result from any inaccuracy or omission in the information contained herein. © State of Queensland 1991 For information about this report contact [email protected] Research Establishments Publication QR91003 Vegetation survey of Batavia Downs Cape York Peninsula V. J. Neldner, J. R. Clarkson Botany Branch Department of Primary Industries Brisbane ISSN 0813-4391 Agdex 301/06 This publication was prepared for officers of the Department of Primary Industries. It may be distributed to other interested individuals and organisations. © Queensland Government 1991 Department of Primary Industries, Queensland GPO Box 46 Brisbane Qld4001 Ill Contents List of figures Page iv List of tables iv List of plates iv Summary v 1.
  • Lead Ecosystem Group Code SBL Habitat Name UKBAP Priority

    Lead Ecosystem Group Code SBL Habitat Name UKBAP Priority

    Lead Ecosystem Group code SBL Habitat name UKBAP Priority habitat name Category M&C H7 Calluna vulgaris-Scilla verna heath Maritime cliff and slopes 3 F&L CG2 Festuca ovina-Helictotrichon pratense grassland Lowland calcareous grassland 1 F&L CG7 Festuca ovina-Hieracium pilosella-Thymus polytrichus grassland Lowland calcareous grassland 1 M&C H7 Calluna vulgaris-Scilla verna heath Maritime cliff and slopes 3 F&L H8 Calluna vulgaris-Ulex gallii heath Lowland heathland 2 F&W M13 Schoenus nigricans-Juncus subnodulosus mire Lowland fens 1 F&L M13 Schoenus nigricans-Juncus subnodulosus mire Upland flushes, fens and swamps 3 F&L M21 Narthecium ossifragum-Sphagnum papillosum valley mire Upland flushes, fens and swamps 3 F&L M23 Juncus effusus/acutiflorus-Galium palustre rush-pasture Upland flushes, fens and swamps 3 F&L M23 Juncus effusus/acutiflorus-Galium palustre rush-pasture Purple moor grass and rush pastures 2 F&W M23 Juncus effusus/acutiflorus-Galium palustre rush-pasture Lowland fens 1 F&L M26 Molinia caerulea-Crepis paludosa fen Purple moor grass and rush pastures 2 F&W M26 Molinia caerulea-Crepis paludosa fen Lowland fens 1 F&W MG11 Festuca rubra-Agrostis stolonifera-Potentilla anserina inundation grassland Coastal and floodplain grazing marsh 3 M&C MG11 Festuca rubra-Agrostis stolonifera-Potentilla anserina inundation grassland Coastal saltmarsh 3 F&L MG11 Festuca rubra-Agrostis stolonifera-Potentilla anserina inundation grassland Open mosaic habitats on previously developed land 3 F&W MG12 Festuca arundinacea coarse grassland Coastal
  • OPP DOC.19.21 Current OMEGA WEST RAW DATA

    OPP DOC.19.21 Current OMEGA WEST RAW DATA

    Total Taxon group Common name Scientific name Designation code Designation group 0 LICHEN Buellia hyperbolica Buellia hyperbolica IUCN Global Red List - Vulnerable, Nationally Rare, NERC S41, UK BAP Priority Species European/National Importance,European and UK Legal Protection 0 LICHEN Lecidea mucosa Lecidea mucosa Nationally Rare European/National Importance 0 FLOWERING PLANT Keeled Garlic Allium carinatum Invasive Non-Native Species Invasive Non-Native 0 LICHEN Micarea submilliaria Micarea submilliaria Nationally Rare European/National Importance 0 CHROMIST Macrocystis pyrifera Macrocystis pyrifera Wildlife and Countryside Act Schedule 9 European and UK Legal Protection 0 CHROMIST Macrocystis laevis Macrocystis laevis Wildlife and Countryside Act Schedule 9 European and UK Legal Protection 0 FLOWERING PLANT Indian Balsam Impatiens glandulifera Invasive Non-Native Species, Wildlife and Countryside Act Schedule 9 Invasive Non-Native,European and UK Legal Protection 0 FLOWERING PLANT False-acacia Robinia pseudoacacia Invasive Non-Native Species, Wildlife and Countryside Act Schedule 9 Invasive Non-Native,European and UK Legal Protection 0 FLOWERING PLANT Giant Hogweed Heracleum mantegazzianum Invasive Non-Native Species, Wildlife and Countryside Act Schedule 9 Invasive Non-Native,European and UK Legal Protection 0 CHROMIST Macrocystis integrifolius Macrocystis integrifolius Wildlife and Countryside Act Schedule 9 European and UK Legal Protection 0 CHROMIST Macrocystis augustifolius Macrocystis augustifolius Wildlife and Countryside Act
  • Myrtle Rust Planting Fact Sheet

    Myrtle Rust Planting Fact Sheet

    Myrtle Rust Planting Fact Sheet What is Myrtle rust? Myrtle rust is a serious fungal disease that affects plants in the Myrtaceae family, including natives such as bottle brush (Callistemon spp.), tea tree (Melaleuca spp.) and eucalypts (Eucalyptus spp.). Myrtle rust is distinctive in that it produces masses of powdery bright yellow or orange-yellow spores on infected plant parts. As myrtle rust is a new disease to Australia, its full host range is unknown. Myrtle rust cannot be eradicated and will continue to spread as it produces thousands of spores which are highly mobile. Although we cannot eradicate the disease, we can limit its spread, manage its impact and carry out research to discover its full host range and seek long-term solutions. Figure 1: Early Symptoms of myrtle rust infection (DEEDI 2011). How does myrtle rust spread? Myrtle rust can spread rapidly because it produces thousands of spores that are easily spread by wind, human activity and animals. The disease can spread through the movement of: • infected or contaminated plant material, nursery stock, plant cuttings, flowers and germ plasm; • animals such as bees, birds, bats and possums that have been in contact with rust spores; • contaminated plant waste, timber, wood packaging and dunnage; • contaminated equipment and tools used on or around plants (e.g. chainsaws, secateurs); and • contaminated clothing, shoes and other personal effects. Myrtle rust is likely to infect plants in wet and humid conditions and rust pustules can mature to release Figure 2: Severe Symptoms of myrtle rust infection spores in as little as 10–12 days.
  • Chapter 12 Bryophytes

    Chapter 12 Bryophytes

    Guidelines for the Selection of Biological SSSIs Part 2: Detailed Guidelines for Habitats and Species Groups Chapter 12 Bryophytes Authors Sam Bosanquet, David Genney and Jonathan Cox To view other Part 2 chapters and Part 1 of the SSSI Selection Guidelines visit: http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-2303 Cite as: Bosanquet, S.D.S., Genney, D.R. and Cox, J.H.S. 2018. Guidelines for the Selection of Biological SSSIs. Part 2: Detailed Guidelines for Habitats and Species Groups. Chapter 12 Bryophytes. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough. © Joint Nature Conservation Committee 2018 Guidelines for the Selection of Biological SSSIs - Part 2: Chapter 12 Bryophytes (2018 revision, v1.0) Cover note This chapter updates and, along with Chapter 13 Lichens and Chapter 14 Non-lichenised fungi, replaces the previous Non-vascular plants SSSI Selection Guidelines chapter (Nature Conservancy Council 1992). It was prepared by Sam Bosanquet (Natural Resources Wales), Jonathan Cox (Natural England) and David Genney (Scottish Natural Heritage), and provides detailed guidance for use in selecting bryophyte sites throughout Great Britain to recommend for notification as SSSIs. It should be used in conjunction with Part 1 of the SSSI Selection Guidelines, as published in 2013 (Bainbridge et al 2013), which detail the overarching rationale, operational approach and criteria for selection of SSSIs. The main changes from the previous version of the chapter are: • only bryophytes (mosses, liverworts and hornworts) are considered; • assemblage scoring is based on ecologically coherent assemblages; • scores for Nationally Scarce species are constant across Britain; • two Atlantic assemblages have scoring systems that include non-Scarce Hyperoceanic species; • a criterion for selecting the largest population of Red List species in each of England, Scotland and Wales is included; and • discontinuation of the Schedule 8 species selection criterion.