DOCSLIB.ORG

Camarines Sur Assessment of the Bottom-Up Budgeting Process for FY 2016 Cleofe S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Camarines Sur Assessment of the Bottom-Up Budgeting Process for FY 2016 Cleofe S Philippine Institute for Development Studies Surian sa mga Pag-aaral Pangkaunlaran ng Pilipinas Camarines Sur Assessment of the Bottom-Up Budgeting Process for FY 2016 Cleofe S. Pastrana and Marites B. Lagarto DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES NO. 2016-25 The PIDS Discussion Paper Series constitutes studies that are preliminary and subject to further revisions. They are be- ing circulated in a limited number of cop- ies only for purposes of soliciting com- ments and suggestions for further refine- ments. The studies under the Series are unedited and unreviewed. The views and opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and do not neces- sarily reflect those of the Institute. Not for quotation without permission from the author(s) and the Institute. June 2016 For comments, suggestions or further inquiries please contact: The Research Information Staff, Philippine Institute for Development Studies 18th Floor, Three Cyberpod Centris - North Tower, EDSA corner Quezon Avenue, 1100 Quezon City, Philippines Telephone Numbers: (63-2) 3721291 and 3721292; E-mail: [email protected] Or visit our website at http://www.pids.gov.ph PROVINCIAL REPORT: CAMARINES SUR ASSESSMENT OF THE BOTTOM-UP BUDGETING PROCESS FOR FY 2016 Cleofe S. Pastrana Marites B. Lagarto Philippine Institute for Development Studies Table of Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................................ iv Abstract ................................................................................................................................ vii I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1 1. General Features of the Bottom-up Budgeting Process ....................................................... 1 2. Objectives of the Study ......................................................................................................... 3 3. Approach and Methodology ................................................................................................. 3 4. Limitations of the Study ........................................................................................................ 6 II. SOCIOECONOMIC PROFILE .................................................................................................. 6 1. Camarines Sur ....................................................................................................................... 6 2. Municipality of Goa ............................................................................................................... 7 3. Municipality of Lagonoy ........................................................................................................ 9 4. Municipality of Libmanan ................................................................................................... 10 III. ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF JMC 5-2014 IN THE FIELD ................................ 12 1. Barangay Development Planning ........................................................................................ 12 1.1. Kalahi-CIDSS (KC) Cycles completed .......................................................................... 12 1.2. Conduct of the Participatory Situation Analysis (PSA) ................................................ 13 1.3. Conduct of Barangay Assembly .................................................................................. 14 1.4. Selection of sitio representatives and BDC Vice-chairs .............................................. 15 2. Inclusiveness of CSO Assembly ........................................................................................... 15 2.1. On who selected/prepared the list of CSOs to be included in the Notice of Municipal CSO Assembly and signatory of the invitation letters ................................................ 16 2.2. On the inclusiveness of the Notices/Invitation Letters .............................................. 18 2.3. Attendance of CSOs .................................................................................................... 18 2.3.1. Comparison of CSOs attendance to the CSO Assembly for FY 2015 and FY 2016 BUB ......................................................................................................... 19 2.4. Observed organized CSOs and assistance provided by NGOs/Entities to CSOs ......... 20 2.5. Non-attendance of CSOs and reasons for non-attendance ........................................ 21 2.6. Views of selected LGU Officials/CSOs on the participation of accredited vis-à-vis non- accredited CSOs .......................................................................................................... 22 3. Quality of CSOs’ Participation in CSO Assemblies ............................................................... 23 3.1. Representativeness of CSOs which attended the CSO Assembly ............................... 24 3.2. Conduct of Poverty Situation Analysis ........................................................................ 27 3.3. Extent of CSO Participation in the CSO Assembly ....................................................... 31 i 3.4. Selection of CSO Representatives to LPRAT and CSO Co-Chair and CSO Signatories of LPRAP .......................................................................................................................... 33 4. Conduct of LPRAT Orientation ........................................................................................... 35 4.1. Attendance of LPRAT Representatives from the 3 LGUs ............................................ 36 4.2. Major Comments/Observations on the LPRAT Orientation ....................................... 36 4.2.1. On the Program Flow ...................................................................................... 37 4.2.2. On the Resource Persons from the Line Agencies .......................................... 37 4.2.3. On the Specific Line Agency Concerns............................................................. 37 4.2.4. On the JMC 5 Provisions and Other BUB Matters ........................................... 38 5. LPRAP Workshop: Identification and Prioritization of BUB projects .................................. 38 5.1. Attendance to LPRAP Workshop ................................................................................ 38 5.2. Validation of Poverty Situation and Review of CSO Assembly Outputs ..................... 40 5.3. Identification of Strategies and Projects..................................................................... 44 5.4. Prioritization of identified projects ............................................................................. 45 5.5. Changes in the FY2016 LPRAP before submission to the RPRAT ................................ 50 5.6. Submission of FY 2016 LPRAP to and Feedback from the RPRAT (configuration of approved LPRAP)......................................................................................................... 54 5.7. Extent of CSO participation in identification of projects ............................................ 56 5.8. Satisfaction with sub-projects included in FY 2016 LPRAP: responsiveness to urgent needs of LGU, contribution to poverty reduction, responsiveness to CSO proposal . 58 5.9 Menu of Programs ...................................................................................................... 60 5.10. Role of the Community Mobilizer (CM) in the CSO Assembly and LPRAP workshop . 62 6. Grassroots Participation: CSO Representatives vs BDC Vice-Chairs ................................... 64 6.1. Participation of CSOs and BDC VCs in CSO Assembly and LPRAP workshop .............. 64 6.2. Advantages and disadvantages of having CSOs and BDC VCs in the Enhanced MDC 64 6.3 Regular BUB vs Enhanced mode ................................................................................. 65 7. Overall GPB/BUB Assessment ............................................................................................. 66 7.1. Benefits /Value-added of GPB/BUB to Project Identification and Prioritization ........ 66 7.2 Benefits/Value-added of BUB to CSOs’ Participation in Development Planning at the Local Level ................................................................................................................... 67 7.3. Benefits/Value-added of BUB on Securing Funding for CSOs ..................................... 69 7.4. Benefits/Value-added of BUB on Improving LGU-CSO Relations ............................... 69 7.5. Benefits/Value-added of BUB on Improving Inter-CSO Relations .............................. 70 7.6. Views/Comments of Selected LGU Officials and CSOs on the Block Grant Modality Versus BUB .................................................................................................................. 70 7.7. Views/Responses of Selected LGU Officials and CSOs on the Roles of the Provincial ii DILG and the Provincial Government ......................................................................... 71 IV. CONTRIBUTION OF LPRAP TO POVERTY ALLEVIATION ........................................................ 72 V. SUBPROJECT IMPLEMENTATION FOR FY 2013, FY 2014 AND FY 2015 .................................. 75 1. Status of implementation ................................................................................................... 75 1.1 FY 2013LPRAP ............................................................................................................. 75
Load more

Recommended publications
  • POPCEN Report No. 3.Pdf
    CITATION: Philippine Statistics Authority, 2015 Census of Population, Report No. 3 – Population, Land Area, and Population Density ISSN 0117-1453 ISSN 0117-1453 REPORT NO. 3 22001155 CCeennssuuss ooff PPooppuullaattiioonn PPooppuullaattiioonn,, LLaanndd AArreeaa,, aanndd PPooppuullaattiioonn DDeennssiittyy Republic of the Philippines Philippine Statistics Authority Quezon City REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES HIS EXCELLENCY PRESIDENT RODRIGO R. DUTERTE PHILIPPINE STATISTICS AUTHORITY BOARD Honorable Ernesto M. Pernia Chairperson PHILIPPINE STATISTICS AUTHORITY Lisa Grace S. Bersales, Ph.D. National Statistician Josie B. Perez Deputy National Statistician Censuses and Technical Coordination Office Minerva Eloisa P. Esquivias Assistant National Statistician National Censuses Service ISSN 0117-1453 FOREWORD The Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) conducted the 2015 Census of Population (POPCEN 2015) in August 2015 primarily to update the country’s population and its demographic characteristics, such as the size, composition, and geographic distribution. Report No. 3 – Population, Land Area, and Population Density is among the series of publications that present the results of the POPCEN 2015. This publication provides information on the population size, land area, and population density by region, province, highly urbanized city, and city/municipality based on the data from population census conducted by the PSA in the years 2000, 2010, and 2015; and data on land area by city/municipality as of December 2013 that was provided by the Land Management Bureau (LMB) of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR). Also presented in this report is the percent change in the population density over the three census years. The population density shows the relationship of the population to the size of land where the population resides.
    [Show full text]
  • Seaweed-Associated Fishes of Lagonoy Gulf in Bicol, the Philippines -With Emphasis on Siganids (Teleoptei: Siganidae)
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Kochi University Repository Kuroshio Science 2-1, 67-72, 2008 Seaweed-associated Fishes of Lagonoy Gulf in Bicol, the Philippines -with Emphasis on Siganids (Teleoptei: Siganidae)- Victor S. Soliman1*, Antonino B. Mendoza, Jr.1 and Kosaku Yamaoka2 1 Coastal Resouces management Unit, Bicol University Tabaco Campus, (Tabaco, Albay 4511, Philippines) 2 Graduate School of Kuroshio Science, Kochi University (Monobe, Nankoku, Kochi 783-8502, Japan) Abstract Lagonoy Gulf is a major fishing ground in the Philippines. It is large (3071 km2) and deep (80% of its area is 800-1200 m) where channels opening to the Pacific Ocean are entrenched. Its annual fishery production of 26,000 MT in 1994 slightly decreased to 20,000 MT in 2004. During the same 10-year period, catches of higher order, predatory fishes decreased and were replaced by herbivores and planktivores. Scombrids such as tunas and mackerels composed 51-54% of total harvest. Of the 480 fish species identified in the gulf, 131 or 27% are seaweed-associated or these fishes have utilized the seaweed habitat for juvenile settlement, refuge, breeding and feeding sites. The seaweeds occupy solely distinct beds (e.g., Sargassum) or overlap with seagrass and coral reef areas. About half of all fishes (49.6% or 238 species) are coral reef fishes. The most speciose fish genera are Chaetodon (19 spp.), Lutjanus (18 spp.), Pomacentrus (17 spp.) and Siganus (14 spp.). Among them, Siganus (Siganids or rabbitfishes) is the most speciose, commercially-important genus contributing 560 mt-yr-1 to the total fishery production, including about 60 mt siganid juvenile catch.
    [Show full text]
  • Province Of: CAMARINES SUR
    1 Republic of the Philippines Department of Health NATIONAL NUTRITION COUNCIL Region V, Legazpi City DIRECTORY OF LOCAL CHIEF EXECUTIVES (LCEs) Province of: CAMARINES SUR DISTRICT/LGU GOVERNOR SEX CONTACT NUMBERS E-MAILADDRESS VICE GOVERNOR SEX CAMARINES Miguel R. Villafuerte M Imelda Papin F SUR E-MAIL DISTRICT/LGU Congressman SEX CONTACT NUMBERS ADDRESS 1st District F 2nd District Luis Raymund F. Villafuerte, Jr. M 3rd District Gabriel H. Bordado M 4th District Arnie Fuentebella M 5th District Josal Fortuno F SE E-MAIL DISTRICT/LGU MAYOR CONTACT NUMBERS VICE-MAYOR SEX X ADDRESS Baao Jeffrey S. Besinio M (054) 266-3083 [email protected] Jose B. Malazarte M Balatan Nena B. Bagasbas F [email protected] Gabriel R. Huab M Bato Frank B. Bernaldez M Domingo L. Zorilla Jr. M Bombon Maria Luisa DC. Angeles M Eddie Felix S. Alteza M Buhi Margarita M. Aguinillo F Jose Alfred N. Balagot M Bula Amelita A. Ibasco F Nilo C. Malanyaon II M Cabusao Weny A. Sabalbero M Jopito O. Agualada M Calabanga Eduardo A. Severo M (054) 470-1740 [email protected] Victor B. De Villa M 2 Republic of the Philippines Department of Health NATIONAL NUTRITION COUNCIL Region V, Legazpi City DIRECTORY OF LOCAL CHIEF EXECUTIVES (LCEs) Province of: CAMARINES SUR Camaligan Marilou M. Hirose F [email protected] Diano SJ. Ibardaloza Jr. M Canaman Nelson M.Legaspi M Venancio B. Regulado M Caramoan Marilyn Socorro H. Co F [email protected] Irene R. Breis F Del Gallego Melanie A. Garcia F [email protected] Cleto R. Suarilla M Gainza Leonardo A.
    [Show full text]
  • Disaster Risk Reduction Management Assessment of Coastal Communities of San Jose, Camarines Sur, Philippines
    International Journal of Development and Sustainability ISSN: 2186-8662 – www.isdsnet.com/ijds Volume 8 Number 7 (2019): Pages 434-451 ISDS Article ID: IJDS17101508 Disaster risk reduction management assessment of coastal communities of San Jose, Camarines Sur, Philippines Agnes R. Pesimo *, Rico D. Saballegue, Elijah D. Medina, Nikki P. Bolalin Partido State University, Goa, Camarines Sur, Philippines Abstract The study aims to identify the disasters affecting the coastal communities of San Jose Camarines Sur, Philippines and evaluate the extent of implementation of the disaster risk reduction management program before, during and after the occurrence of disaster. Findings revealed that the coastal communities of San Jose are at risks to disasters like landslide in Adiangao, flooding in Kinalansan, Dolo and Sabang and tsunami in Sabang, Dolo, Minoro, Kinalansan, Manzana, Telegrafo, Calalahan and Tagas. These coastal communities are also prone to storm surges which are experienced during typhoon. The provisions for disaster risk reduction management programs particularly on disaster prevention and mitigation, preparedness and rehabilitation and recovery have not been or poorly implemented while the provisions on disaster response were partially implemented. This places the lives and properties of the community still at high risk and vulnerability during the occurrence of disaster caused by climate change. Keywords: Disaster; Risk Reduction Management; Assessment; Coastal Communities Published by ISDS LLC, Japan | Copyright © 2019 by the Author(s) | This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Cite this article as: Pesimo, A.R., Saballegue, R.D., Medina, E.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the Fisheries of Lagonoy Gulf (Region 5)
    ASSESSMENT OF THE FISHERIES OF LAGONOY GULF (REGION 5) VIRGINIA L. OLAÑO, MARIETTA B. VERGARA and FE L. GONZALES ASSESSMENT OF THE FISHERIES OF LAGONOY GULF (REGION 5) VIRGINIA L. OLAÑO Project Leader, National Stock Assessment Program (NSAP) Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources, Region 5 (BFAR 5) San Agustin, Pili, Camarines Sur MARIETTA B. VERGARA Assistant Project Leader, NSAP BFAR 5, San Agustin, Pili, Camarines Sur and FE L. GONZALES Co-Project Leader BFAR-National Fisheries Research and Development Institute Kayumanggi Press Building, Quezon Avenue, Quezon City Assessment of the Fisheries of Lagonoy Gulf CONTENTS List of Tables iii List of Figures iv List of Abbreviations, Acronyms and Symbols vi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS viii ABSTRACT ix INTRODUCTION 1 Objectives of the Study 3 General 3 Specific 3 METHODOLOGY 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 6 Boat and Gear Inventory 6 Production Estimates 6 Catch Composition 6 Dominant Fish Families 6 Dominant Fish Species 7 Catch Composition of the Major Types of Fishing Gear 8 Catch Contribution of the Major Types of Fishing Gear 13 Seasonality of Species 15 Catch Per Unit Effort 17 Surplus Production 17 Estimation of Population Parameters 18 Relative Yield Per Recruit 21 Probability of Capture and Virtual Population Analysis 22 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 27 REFERENCES 30 ii Assessment of the Fisheries of Lagonoy Gulf TABLES Table 1 Production estimates by gear based on boat and gear inventory in Lagonoy Gulf (June to December 2001 7 Table 2 Dominant fish and invertebrate species caught by major gear
    [Show full text]
  • PROTECTION ASSESSMENT: Super Typhoon Haiyan (Yolanda) Report As of 14 November 2013, 1700 Hrs, Issue No
    PROTECTION ASSESSMENT: Super Typhoon Haiyan (Yolanda) Report as of 14 November 2013, 1700 hrs, Issue No. 5 UNHCR provided plastic sheetings for internally displaced Affected children have started to openly beg for donations Some displaced families have returned to their habitual persons in Tanaun Municipality , Leyte province to serve as while others have been selling salvaged materials. residences despite the damages. Physical safety of these a temporary roofing. Photo by: UNHCR Photo by: UNHCR IDPs is at risk. Photo by: UNHCR HIGHLIGHTS • Identification and profiling of internally displaced persons (IDPs) who are moving out the affected areas is urgently needed. Report state that most of these IDPs are leaving through airports and seaports with ( if any ) minimal controls. This situation increases the risk that women and children (especially if unaccompanied ) are exposed to human trafficking. • Power remains cut off in some parts of Regions IV-B, V, VI, VII, and VIII. This lack of electricity/lighting increases protection risk among IDPs both in evacuation centers and house-based. Women and children are particularly at risk in the nights. • The need for plastic sheetings for temporary shelter and roofing continue to increase as damage and needs assessment started to reach more affected-areas. • Damage and need assessment among local government units and humanitarian actors is ongoing however, there are still isolated areas that have not been reached yet. Delivery of humanitarian assistance in isolated areas remains a challenge due to broken bridges and road. • IDPs living in evacuation centers are sharing small spaces and there is no privacy. Tensions are on the rise.
    [Show full text]
  • DIRECTORY of LOCAL CHIEF EXECUTIVES (Lces) As of March 2019 Province Of: ALBAY E-MAIL DISTRICT/LGU GOVERNOR SEX CONTACT NUMBERS VICE GOVERNOR SEX ADDRESS
    Republic of the Philippines Department of Health NATIONAL NUTRITION COUNCIL Region V, Legazpi City DIRECTORY OF LOCAL CHIEF EXECUTIVES (LCEs) As of March 2019 Province of: ALBAY E-MAIL DISTRICT/LGU GOVERNOR SEX CONTACT NUMBERS VICE GOVERNOR SEX ADDRESS ALBAY Al Francis DC. Bichara M 480-344 Harold O. Imperial M E-MAIL DISTRICT/LGU Congressman SEX CONTACT NUMBERS ADDRESS 1st District Edcel Lagman M 2nd District Jose Ma. Clemente S. Salceda M 3rd District Fernando O. Gonzales M E-MAIL DISTRICT/LGU MAYOR SEX CONTACT NUMBERS VICE-MAYOR SEX ADDRESS Legazpi City Noel E. Rosal M 480-0139/09175581777 [email protected] Roberto Cristobal M 485-1255/09175834717/ Ligao City Patricia G. Alsua F [email protected] Sherwin P. Quising M 485-1115 Cielo Krisel Lagman- Tabaco City F 487-5238/0917-5584377 [email protected] Nestor San Pablo M Luistro Republic of the Philippines Department of Health NATIONAL NUTRITION COUNCIL Region V, Legazpi City DIRECTORY OF LOCAL CHIEF EXECUTIVES (LCEs) As of March 2019 Divina Bañares- Bacacay Amando B. Romano M F Bonavente Carlos Irwin G. Baldo, Camalig Ma. Ahrdail G. Baldo F M Jr. Daraga Carlwyn G. Baldo M 483-5328/09175585132 820-363/09175898590/ Guinobatan Ann Y. Ongjoco F [email protected] July S. Tingzon IV M 0999-9905799 Jovellar Jorem Arcangel M 9159054000 [email protected] Jose A. Nobleza, Jr. M Libon Wilfredo V. Maronilla M 486-6101 Marl Gregore Sayson M Malilipot Cenon Volante M Nong AmpiG M Malinao Alicia B. Morales M [email protected] Sheryl Capus-Bilo F Manito Joshua Mari Daep M Carlito Belludo M Antonio II B.
    [Show full text]
  • SURNAME FIRST NAME Cea Alexander Boe Gilbert Angeles Luis
    Republic of the Philippines DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT Regional Office No. 5 DOLE 5 Bldg., Doña Aurora Street, Old Albay, Legazpi City Tel. No. (052) 480-5830 / 480-5831/ 480-3058 / 481-0768 Tulong Panghanapbuhay sa ating Disadvantaged/Displaced Workers TUPAD Beneficiaries July-September 2019 NAME SURNAME FIRST NAME GENDER PROJECT NAME PLACE OF IMPLEMENTATION REMARKS ALBAY NONE CAMARINES NORTE NONE CAMARINES SUR Cea Alexander Boe Gilbert Angeles Luis Cobilla Rosaly Señar, Maria Celetaria Lorna Camila Fidela Dolor, Roger Hermogeno Reymond Trillanes Alfredo Manjares Roberto Torrecampo Terisita Velasco Christine Angeles Joel Manjares, Lourdes Zambales, Evelyn Camila, Girlie Aniog, Sagñay, Camarines Sur Mariño, Mabelle Mora, Rogelio II Villareal, Richard Aniog, Sagñay, Camarines Sur Almonte, Wilfredo Salcedo, Eden Camila, Lorenzo Salcedo, Randy Rivera, Arnulfo Casyao Christian Angeles Nolie Mojar Edwin Magante Fe Romero Ester Salcedo Sarah Avila Sharoll Camila Rodel Jr. Camila Florencio Balinquit Jerry Lumabas Roselyn Mora Ronnie Mojar Nenita Manjares, Roselyn Camila Jenyfer Dacame Nora Bebero, Vilmen Pacay Rusty Patriarca Maria Esmenda Gerald Havana Eva Garcia Fecelidad Sadsad Tomas Gacer, Emerson Consulta, Magdalena Gilles, Ludy Flor Bebero Jinky Atulayan, Sagñay, Camarines Sur Buenavente Jowelyn Erot Jovit Gacer Lorna Toreja Vilma Perico Pascual Jr. Gacer Evelio Banday Antonia Perico, Ma. Lourdes Atulayan, Sagñay, Camarines Sur Gavica Jolivit Caña Marita Laurente Nancy Perico Eden Buenavente Nilda Correo Rosa Gacer Nenita Pacay Asela Pollo Fabiana Papa, Leancelle Sanchez Leonora Bebero Jonel Buenavente, Jayward Buenavente Ronie Gacer Vicente Caña Jennyvic Fernando Wendello Pacay Peter Patrick Caña Jing-jing Olaño Hernando Mapa Lerma Delos Santos Lisly Ramos Jerulyn Moreno Clara Cepe Apple Jean Buela Rechilda Cepe Robina Bongalon, Sagñay, Camarines Sur Cepe Jose Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Lidar Surveys and Flood Mapping of Lagonoy River
    LiDAR Surveys and Flood Mapping of Lagonoy River 1 Hazard Mapping of the Philippines Using LIDAR (Phil-LIDAR 1) 2 LiDAR Surveys and Flood Mapping of Lagonoy River © University of the Philippines Diliman and Ateneo de Naga University Published by the UP Training Center for Applied Geodesy and Photogrammetry (TCAGP) College of Engineering University of the Philippines – Diliman Quezon City 1101 PHILIPPINES This research project is supported by the Department of Science and Technology (DOST) as part of its Grants-in-Aid Program and is to be cited as: E.C. Paringit and J.C. Plopenio (Eds.) (2017), LiDAR Surveys and Flood Mapping of Lagonoy River, Quezon City: University of the Philippines Training Center for Applied Geodesy and Photogrammetry-148 pp. The text of this information may be copied and distributed for research and educational purposes with proper acknowledgement. While every care is taken to ensure the accuracy of this publication, the UP TCAGP disclaims all responsibility and all liability (including without limitation, liability in negligence) and costs which might incur as a result of the materials in this publication being inaccurate or incomplete in any way and for any reason. For questions/queries regarding this report, contact: Ms. Joanaviva Plopenio Project Leader, Phil-LiDAR 1 Program Ateneo de Naga University Naga City, Philippines 4400 E-mail: [email protected] Enrico C. Paringit, Dr. Eng. Program Leader, Phil-LiDAR 1 Program University of the Philippines Diliman Quezon City, Philippines 1101 E-mail: [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Sitrep No.11 Re Preparedness Measures and Effects of TD USMAN
    SITREP NO. 11 TAB A Preparedness Measures and Effects for Tropical Depression "USMAN" AFFECTED POPULATION As of 01 January 2019, 6:00 AM TOTAL SERVED - CURRENT Region/Province/ AFFECTED No. of Evac Inside Evacuation Centers Outside Evacuation Centers (Inside + Outside) Mun/City Centers Brgys Families Persons Families Persons Families Persons Families Persons GRAND TOTAL 457 45,348 191,597 170 6,637 24,894 12,132 54,665 18,769 79,559 REGION IV-A (CALABARZON) 37 339 1,418 37 334 1,423 0 0 334 1,423 LAGUNA 4 26 99 3 26 99 0 0 26 99 CALAUAN 1 1 4 1 1 4 - - 1 4 PANGIL 1 3 11 1 3 11 - - 3 11 SAN PABLO CITY 2 22 84 1 22 84 - - 22 84 QUEZON 33 313 1,319 34 308 1,324 0 0 308 1,324 AGDANGAN 1 6 30 1 6 30 - - 6 30 ATIMONAN 6 37 163 6 37 193 - - 37 193 GUMACA 7 76 326 9 76 326 - - 76 326 INFANTA 3 5 25 - - - - - 0 0 LOPEZ 2 8 32 2 8 32 - - 8 32 MACALELON 2 5 16 3 5 16 - - 5 16 MAUBAN 2 14 40 2 14 40 - - 14 40 PAGBILAO 1 48 240 2 48 240 - - 48 240 PITOGO 3 38 132 3 38 132 - - 38 132 PLARIDEL 4 22 94 4 22 94 - - 22 94 QUEZON 1 2 6 1 2 6 - - 2 6 REAL 1 52 215 1 52 215 - - 52 215 MIMAROPA 20 988 3,675 18 614 2,119 82 410 696 2,529 MARINDUQUE 4 99 298 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GASAN 1 63 176 - - - - - 0 0 MOGPOG 3 36 122 - - - - - 0 0 ORIENTAL MINDORO 15 761 2,849 18 614 2,119 82 410 696 2,529 BACO 4 456 1,520 4 403 1,255 53 265 456 1,520 BANSUD 1 1 4 1 1 5 - - 1 5 BONGABONG 1 55 183 1 55 183 - - 55 183 CALAPAN 3 116 532 4 86 386 29 145 115 531 NAUJAN 3 5 24 3 5 24 - - 5 24 PINAMALAYAN 1 38 136 1 38 136 - - 38 136 POLA 1 50 250 3 22 110 - - 22 110 VICTORIA 1 40 200
    [Show full text]
  • Preparedness Measures and Effects for Tropical Depression "USMAN" AFFECTED POPULATION As of 11 January 2019, 6:00 AM
    SITREP NO. 23 TAB A Preparedness Measures and Effects for Tropical Depression "USMAN" AFFECTED POPULATION As of 11 January 2019, 6:00 AM TOTAL SERVED - CURRENT Region/Province/ AFFECTED No. of Evac Inside Evacuation Centers Outside Evacuation Centers (Inside + Outside) Mun/City Centers Brgys Families Persons Families Persons Families Persons Families Persons GRAND TOTAL 1,079 170,114 724,346 67 2,006 7,967 21,668 101,316 23,674 109,283 REGION IV-A (CALABARZON) 45 407 1,688 1 1 4 - - 1 4 BATANGAS 4 12 47 - - - - - - - CUENCA 2 8 30 - - - - - - - LOBO 1 1 3 - - - - - - - SANTA TERESITA 1 3 14 - - - - - - - LAGUNA 8 82 322 1 1 4 - - 1 4 CALAMBA CITY 1 16 58 - - - - - CALAUAN 1 2 5 - - - - - - - LILIW 1 7 36 - - - - - - - LOS BAÑOS 2 32 128 - - - - - - - PANGIL 1 3 11 1 1 4 - - 1 4 SAN PABLO CITY 2 22 84 - - - - - - - QUEZON 33 313 1,319 - - - - - - - AGDANGAN 1 6 30 - - - - - - - ATIMONAN 6 37 163 - - - - - - - GUMACA 7 76 326 - - - - - - - INFANTA 3 5 25 - - - - - - - LOPEZ 2 8 32 - - - - - - - MACALELON 2 5 16 - - - - - - - MAUBAN 2 14 40 - - - - - - - PAGBILAO 1 48 240 - - - - - - - PITOGO 3 38 132 - - - - - - - PLARIDEL 4 22 94 - - - - - - - QUEZON 1 2 6 - - - - - - - REAL 1 52 215 - - - - - - - MIMAROPA 58 5,086 22,582 2 3 14 - - 3 14 MARINDUQUE 4 99 298 - - - - - - - GASAN 1 63 176 - - - - - 0 0 MOGPOG 3 36 122 - - - - - 0 0 ORIENTAL MINDORO 53 4,859 21,756 2 3 14 - - 3 14 BACO 8 1,375 6,089 - - - - - - - BANSUD 3 612 3,059 1 1 4 - - 1 4 BONGABONG 3 791 3,324 - - - - - - - CALAPAN 5 259 1,242 - - - - - - - GLORIA 6 189 876 - - - - -
    [Show full text]
  • House of Representatives
    CONGRESS OF THE PHILIPPINES FOURTEENTH CONGRESS First Regular Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES H. No. 4264 BY REPRESENTATIVE VILLAFUERTE, PER COMMITTEE REPORT NO. 624 AN ACT REAPPORTIONING THE COMPOSITION OF THE FIRST (IST) AND SECOND (2N0) LEGISLATIVE DISTRICTS IN THE PROVINCE OF CAMARINES SUR AND THEREBY CREATING A NEW LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT FROM SUCH REAPPORTIONMENT Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the Philippines in Congress assembled: 1 SECTION1. The composition of the current First (I") and Second (2"') 2 Legislative Districts in the Province of Camarines Sur is hereby reapportioned 3 in order to create an additional legislative district to commence' in the next 4 national elections afier the effectivity of this Act. 5 SEC. 2. In furtherance of the reapportionment mandated by this Act, / 6 the municipalities of Libmanan, Minalabac, Pamplona, Pasacao and San 7 Fernando of the current First (1'9 Legislative District are hereby consolidated 8 with the municipalities of Gainza and Milaor of the current Second (2"') 9 Legislative District, to comprise the new legislative district authorized under 10 this Act. 11 SEC. 3. The result of the reapportionment described in this Act are 12 summarized as follows: 1 (a) First District - The remaining municipalities in the current First 2 (If? Legislative District shall continue -to he designated as the First (1'9 3 Legislative District, composed of the following municipalities: Del Gallego, 4 Ragay, Lupi, Sipocot and Cabusao; 5 (h) Second District - This new legislative
    [Show full text]