Community-Based Marine Sanctuaries in the Philippines: a Report on Focus Group Discussions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Community-Based Marine Sanctuaries in the Philippines: a Report on Focus Group Discussions COMMUNITY-BASED MARINE SANCTUARIES in the PHILIPPINES:A REPORT on FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONS Brian Crawford, Miriam Balgos and Cesario R. Pagdilao June 2000 Coastal Resources Center Philippine Council for Aquatic and University of Rhode Island Marine Research and Development Community-Based Marine Sanctuaries in the Philippines: A Report on Focus Group Discussions Brian Crawford Coastal Resources Center University of Rhode Island Miriam Balgos Graduate College of Marine Studies University of Delaware Cesario R. Pagdilao Philippine Council for Aquatic and Marine Research and Development Department of Science and Technology June 2000 Acknowledgments The authors of this paper would like to thank the numerous individuals who assisted with this effort. Over fifty participants from a diverse mix of institutions participated in a series of four focus group discussions whose inputs, comments and explanations about their respective experience contributed substantially to the contents of this report. A list of participating individuals and institutions is provided in Annex 5. We particularly appreciated the participation of individuals who traveled long distances from locations outside the city venues to attend, especially the representatives of local people’s organizations. We are grateful to the many participants who provided lists of community-based marine sanctuary sites for possible inclusion in the field investigation, as well as related secondary data and references. We greatly appreciated the assistance of the Marine Science Institute (MSI) of the University of the Philippines and the Silliman University Marine Laboratory (SUML) and Center of Excellence in Coastal Resources Management, for serving as venue hosts in Manila and Dumaguete respectively, and particularly the assistance of Porfirio Aliño, Charina Conte and Maricar Samson of MSI, and Hilconida Calumpung, Roy Olsen de Leon, Pacita Raterta, and Julieta Luchavez of SUML. The Coastal Resources Management Project-Philippines (CRMP- Philippines) team, including Catherine Courtney, Alan White, Rebecca Pestano-Smith, Mike Ross, Evelyn Deguit, Melvin, Cookie, Glen, and others, provided work space and logistical support for the Cebu focus group discussion preparations, access to the Coastal Municipal Database, organized a field trip to Olango Island for the Indonesian participants, and supplied them with mountains of documents and information. We would also like to thank the SUML staff, Roy Olsen de Leon, Pablina Cadiz, as well as Mario Pascobello from Apo Island, for arranging a field visit to Apo Island for the Indonesian participants following the Dumaguete focus group discussion. Additional thanks are extended to Chris Rotinsulu and Asep Sukmara from the Proyek Pesisir (Coastal Resources Management Project –Indonesia) North Sulawesi Field Program who contributed their perspectives in the Cebu and Dumaguete focus group discussions, and to several University of Rhode Island faculty, graduate students and Coastal Resources Center staff who also contributed their comments on the draft background paper, focus group agenda, the preliminary conceptual framework and the initial list of factors contributing to the success of community-based marine sanctuaries. Our appreciation is also extended to several staff from Philippine Council for Aquatic and Marine Research and Development (PCAMRD) who assisted with arrangements for the focus group discussions, including Ester Zaragoza, Adela Corpuz, Precious Samonte and Eileen Redera, as well as Jun Olandez who represented PCAMRD in Cebu and Dumaguete who along with Adela assisted in note taking. We would especially like to thank Dr. Rafael Guererro III, Executive Director of PCAMRD, for expressing his support and enthusiasm for this project and his inspirational remarks at the opening of the first focus group discussion in Manila. Lastly, we would like to thank the David and Lucile Packard Foundation who provided the funding which made the discussions and this report possible. i Table of Contents Page Acknowledgments......................................................................................................... i Executive Summary ...................................................................................................iii Ringkasan Eksekutif (Executive Summary in Bahasa Indonesia) ........................ ix 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Overview.................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Philippine Component.......................................................................................... 1 1.3 Community-Based Coastal Resources Management and Marine Sanctuaries in the Philippines.................................................................. 4 1.4 The Indonesian Context in North Sulawesi........................................................ 10 2. Models and Conceptual Framework for Community-Based Marine Sanctuaries in the Philippines .............................................................. 13 2.1 Definition of a Community-Based Marine Sanctuary........................................ 13 2.2 Benefits of a Community-Based Marine Sanctuary........................................... 15 2.3 The General Program Model and Conceptual Framework ................................ 16 3. Factors Contributing to the Success of Community-Based Marine Sanctuaries ............................................................ 29 3.1 Context Factors .................................................................................................. 31 3.2 Project Intervention Factors ............................................................................... 33 4. Community-Based Marine Sanctuary Sites in the Philippines....................... 37 5. The Field Research Design and the Philippines-Indonesia Workshop .......... 38 5.1 The Field Research Design ................................................................................ 38 5.2 The Joint Philippines – Indonesia Workshop..................................................... 39 Annexes ....................................................................................................................A-1 1. References and Selected Bibliography................................................................A-2 2. Focus Group Discussion Agenda ........................................................................A-6 3. Discussion Questions ..........................................................................................A-7 4. Summary of Factors Influencing Success (Impacts) from a Literature Review by R. B. Pollnac.........................................................A-9 5. List of Participants ............................................................................................A-13 6. Community-Based Marine Sanctuary Sites ......................................................A-18 7. Examples of Municipal Ordinances for a Community-Based Marine Sanctuary and Marine Reserve .............................................................A-31 8. Summary of Participant Evaluations of the Focus Group Discussions.............A-42 ii Executive Summary A group of fifty-four field practitioners and experts with extensive experience in community-based coastal resources and marine protected area management in the Philippines, representing a diverse group of institutions and backgrounds, participated in a series of four one-day focus group discussions during January 2000. The purpose of these meetings were to discuss and summarize experience and lessons learned with respect to the establishment, implementation, promotion and widespread replication of community-based marine sanctuaries in the Philippines. This report summarizes the results of these discussions. It explains what is a community- based marine sanctuary, and what are their potential benefits. It describes the conceptual framework or general model which is applied in the Philippines and variations within this model which can be found among numerous examples now existing in hundreds of coastal municipalities. It details a range of measures of success, and potential context and project intervention factors that are considered to influence success. The annexes to this report include: the focus group agenda and discussion questions; a list of the focus group participants; a list of marine sanctuary sites; references and selected bibliography; a summary of participant evaluations and examples of municipal ordinances establishing a marine sanctuary and marine reserve. The Philippines now has over two decades of experience with community-based marine sanctuaries and a growing body of literature concerning the lessons learned from this experience. Hundreds of marine sanctuaries have now been established, but it is uncertain how many can be considered successful. Many people believe that a large number of these community-based marine sanctuaries are not yet operating successfully and the possible reasons for this were discussed by the focus groups. Marine sanctuaries can generally be defined as permanently closed areas where all human extractive activities are prohibited, particularly fishing. These are also referred to as “no- take” zones. In the Philippines, this definition applies to many areas called fish sanctuaries, marine sanctuaries and in some instances marine reserves. However, marine reserves are generally defined as
Recommended publications
  • POPCEN Report No. 3.Pdf
    CITATION: Philippine Statistics Authority, 2015 Census of Population, Report No. 3 – Population, Land Area, and Population Density ISSN 0117-1453 ISSN 0117-1453 REPORT NO. 3 22001155 CCeennssuuss ooff PPooppuullaattiioonn PPooppuullaattiioonn,, LLaanndd AArreeaa,, aanndd PPooppuullaattiioonn DDeennssiittyy Republic of the Philippines Philippine Statistics Authority Quezon City REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES HIS EXCELLENCY PRESIDENT RODRIGO R. DUTERTE PHILIPPINE STATISTICS AUTHORITY BOARD Honorable Ernesto M. Pernia Chairperson PHILIPPINE STATISTICS AUTHORITY Lisa Grace S. Bersales, Ph.D. National Statistician Josie B. Perez Deputy National Statistician Censuses and Technical Coordination Office Minerva Eloisa P. Esquivias Assistant National Statistician National Censuses Service ISSN 0117-1453 FOREWORD The Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) conducted the 2015 Census of Population (POPCEN 2015) in August 2015 primarily to update the country’s population and its demographic characteristics, such as the size, composition, and geographic distribution. Report No. 3 – Population, Land Area, and Population Density is among the series of publications that present the results of the POPCEN 2015. This publication provides information on the population size, land area, and population density by region, province, highly urbanized city, and city/municipality based on the data from population census conducted by the PSA in the years 2000, 2010, and 2015; and data on land area by city/municipality as of December 2013 that was provided by the Land Management Bureau (LMB) of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR). Also presented in this report is the percent change in the population density over the three census years. The population density shows the relationship of the population to the size of land where the population resides.
    [Show full text]
  • EASTERN VISAYAS: SUMMARY of REHABILITATION ACTIVITIES (As of 24 Mar)
    EASTERN VISAYAS: SUMMARY OF REHABILITATION ACTIVITIES (as of 24 Mar) Map_OCHA_Region VIII_01_3W_REHAB_24032014_v1 BIRI PALAPAG LAVEZARES SAN JOSE ALLEN ROSARIO BOBON MONDRAGON LAOANG VICTORIA SAN CATARMAN ROQUE MAPANAS CAPUL SAN CATUBIG ANTONIO PAMBUJAN GAMAY N O R T H E R N S A M A R LAPINIG SAN SAN ISIDRO VICENTE LOPE DE VEGA LAS NAVAS SILVINO LOBOS JIPAPAD ARTECHE SAN POLICARPIO CALBAYOG CITY MATUGUINAO MASLOG ORAS SANTA GANDARA TAGAPUL-AN MARGARITA DOLORES SAN JOSE DE BUAN SAN JORGE CAN-AVID PAGSANGHAN MOTIONG ALMAGRO TARANGNAN SANTO PARANAS NI-O (WRIGHT) TAFT CITY OF JIABONG CATBALOGAN SULAT MARIPIPI W E S T E R N S A M A R B I L I R A N SAN JULIAN KAWAYAN SAN SEBASTIAN ZUMARRAGA HINABANGAN CULABA ALMERIA CALBIGA E A S T E R N S A M A R NAVAL DARAM CITY OF BORONGAN CAIBIRAN PINABACDAO BILIRAN TALALORA VILLAREAL CALUBIAN CABUCGAYAN SANTA RITA BALANGKAYAN MAYDOLONG SAN BABATNGON ISIDRO BASEY BARUGO LLORENTE LEYTE SAN HERNANI TABANGO MIGUEL CAPOOCAN ALANGALANG MARABUT BALANGIGA TACLOBAN GENERAL TUNGA VILLABA CITY MACARTHUR CARIGARA SALCEDO SANTA LAWAAN QUINAPONDAN MATAG-OB KANANGA JARO FE PALO TANAUAN PASTRANA ORMOC CITY GIPORLOS PALOMPON MERCEDES DAGAMI TABONTABON JULITA TOLOSA GUIUAN ISABEL MERIDA BURAUEN DULAG ALBUERA LA PAZ MAYORGA L E Y T E MACARTHUR JAVIER (BUGHO) CITY OF BAYBAY ABUYOG MAHAPLAG INOPACAN SILAGO HINDANG SOGOD Legend HINUNANGAN HILONGOS BONTOC Response activities LIBAGON Administrative limits HINUNDAYAN BATO per Municipality SAINT BERNARD ANAHAWAN Province boundary MATALOM SAN JUAN TOMAS (CABALIAN) OPPUS Municipality boundary MALITBOG S O U T H E R N L E Y T E Ongoing rehabilitation Ongoing MAASIN CITY activites LILOAN MACROHON PADRE BURGOS SAN 1-30 Planned FRANCISCO SAN 30-60 RICARDO LIMASAWA PINTUYAN 60-90 Data sources:OCHA,Clusters 0 325 K650 975 1,300 1,625 90-121 Kilometers EASTERN VISAYAS:SUMMARY OF REHABILITATION ACTIVITIES AS OF 24th Mar 2014 Early Food Sec.
    [Show full text]
  • Provincial Government of Albay and the Center for Initiatives And
    Strengthening Climate Resilience Provincial Government of Albay and the SCR Center for Initiatives and Research on Climate Adaptation Case Study Summary PHILIPPINES Which of the three pillars does this project or policy intervention best illustrate? Tackling Exposure to Changing Hazards and Disaster Impacts Enhancing Adaptive Capacity Addressing Poverty, Vulnerabil- ity and their Causes In 2008, the Province of Albay in the Philippines was declared a "Global Local Government Unit (LGU) model for Climate Change Adapta- tion" by the UN-ISDR and the World Bank. The province has boldly initiated many innovative approaches to tackling disaster risk reduction (DRR) and climate change adaptation (CCA) in Albay and continues to integrate CCA into its current DRM structure. Albay maintains its position as the first mover in terms of climate smart DRR by imple- menting good practices to ensure zero casualty during calamities, which is why the province is now being recognized throughout the world as a local govern- ment exemplar in Climate Change Adap- tation. It has pioneered in mainstreaming “Think Global Warming. Act Local Adaptation.” CCA in the education sector by devel- oping a curriculum to teach CCA from -- Provincial Government of Albay the primary level up which will be imple- Through the leadership of Gov. Joey S. Salceda, Albay province has become the first province to mented in schools beginning the 2010 proclaim climate change adaptation as a governing policy, and the Provincial Government of Albay schoolyear. Countless information, edu- cation and communication activities have (PGA) was unanimously proclaimed as the first and pioneering prototype for local Climate Change been organized to create climate change Adaptation.
    [Show full text]
  • 11.4.6 Balud, Calumpang, Masbate Port
    JICA-MARINA The Study on Domestic Shipping Development Plan in the Philippines (DSDP) Final Report Figure 11.4.11. Development Plan of Port of Bogo Polambato 11.4.6 Balud, Calumpang, Masbate Port Balud (Calumpang) Port was constructed by DOTC in 2000. The port facilities were subsequently expanded by LGU-Province in 2001 utilizing funds from DOTC under a Memorandum of Agreement with the said agency. The port is currently operational. However, the collection system of port fees and charges has not been established yet by the LGU. At present, the existing port conditions and requirements are shown in Table 11.4.4 and Figure 11.4.1S. Based on the identified problems and issues of Balud, Calumpang Port, the Development plan is proposed as illustrated in Figure 11.4.13. Table 11.4.4. Balud, Calumpang Port Existing Conditions and Requirements RoRo Ramp and Open Pier Port has one set of RoRo ramp/good condition; 50m open pier in good condition; Dredging Existing depth at end of RoRo ramp is (-) 2.5 m; Port needs dredging Reclamation; Slope protection Existing reclamation area is 50m X 46m; and stair landing 25% of reclamation area is damaged – needs removal/repair; Port needs additional back-up area and widening of 50m access road to highway Buildings No building facilities Utility No potable water supply, lighting and public address system; Perimeter Fence and Gate No fence and main gate needed to comply with port security requirements Navigational Aids No Navigational Aids Breasting Dolphins 2 units BD with rubber fender and tee heads needed for proper mooring of vessels Road Access 21-km access road to Balud Poblacion, unpaved; 20-km access road to Masbate City unpaved – needs upgrade 11-31 JICA-MARINA The Study on Domestic Shipping Development Plan in the Philippines (DSDP) Final Report Figure 11.4.12.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridges Across Oceans: Initial Impact Assessment of the Philippines Nautical Highway System and Lessons for Southeast Asia
    Bridges across Oceans Initial Impact Assessment of the Philippines Nautical Highway System and Lessons for Southeast Asia April 2010 0 2010 Asian Development Bank All rights reserved. Published 2010. Printed in the Philippines ISBN 978-971-561-896-0 Publication Stock No. RPT101731 Cataloging-In-Publication Data Bridges across Oceans: Initial Impact Assessment of the Philippines Nautical Highway System and Lessons for Southeast Asia. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank, 2010. 1. Transport Infrastructure. 2. Southeast Asia. I. Asian Development Bank. The views expressed in this book are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. ADB encourages printing or copying information exclusively for personal and noncommercial use with proper acknowledgment of ADB. Users are restricted from reselling, redistributing, or creating derivative works for commercial purposes without the express, written consent of ADB. Note: In this report, “$” refers to US dollars. 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines Tel +63 2 632
    [Show full text]
  • Estimation of Local Poverty in the Philippines
    Estimation of Local Poverty in the Philippines November 2005 Republika ng Pilipinas PAMBANSANG LUPON SA UGNAYANG PANG-ESTADISTIKA (NATIONAL STATISTICAL COORDINATION BOARD) http://www.nscb.gov.ph in cooperation with The WORLD BANK Estimation of Local Poverty in the Philippines FOREWORD This report is part of the output of the Poverty Mapping Project implemented by the National Statistical Coordination Board (NSCB) with funding assistance from the World Bank ASEM Trust Fund. The methodology employed in the project combined the 2000 Family Income and Expenditure Survey (FIES), 2000 Labor Force Survey (LFS) and 2000 Census of Population and Housing (CPH) to estimate poverty incidence, poverty gap, and poverty severity for the provincial and municipal levels. We acknowledge with thanks the valuable assistance provided by the Project Consultants, Dr. Stephen Haslett and Dr. Geoffrey Jones of the Statistics Research and Consulting Centre, Massey University, New Zealand. Ms. Caridad Araujo, for the assistance in the preliminary preparations for the project; and Dr. Peter Lanjouw of the World Bank for the continued support. The Project Consultants prepared Chapters 1 to 8 of the report with Mr. Joseph M. Addawe, Rey Angelo Millendez, and Amando Patio, Jr. of the NSCB Poverty Team, assisting in the data preparation and modeling. Chapters 9 to 11 were prepared mainly by the NSCB Project Staff after conducting validation workshops in selected provinces of the country and the project’s national dissemination forum. It is hoped that the results of this project will help local communities and policy makers in the formulation of appropriate programs and improvements in the targeting schemes aimed at reducing poverty.
    [Show full text]
  • Province, City, Municipality Total and Barangay Population AURORA
    2010 Census of Population and Housing Aurora Total Population by Province, City, Municipality and Barangay: as of May 1, 2010 Province, City, Municipality Total and Barangay Population AURORA 201,233 BALER (Capital) 36,010 Barangay I (Pob.) 717 Barangay II (Pob.) 374 Barangay III (Pob.) 434 Barangay IV (Pob.) 389 Barangay V (Pob.) 1,662 Buhangin 5,057 Calabuanan 3,221 Obligacion 1,135 Pingit 4,989 Reserva 4,064 Sabang 4,829 Suclayin 5,923 Zabali 3,216 CASIGURAN 23,865 Barangay 1 (Pob.) 799 Barangay 2 (Pob.) 665 Barangay 3 (Pob.) 257 Barangay 4 (Pob.) 302 Barangay 5 (Pob.) 432 Barangay 6 (Pob.) 310 Barangay 7 (Pob.) 278 Barangay 8 (Pob.) 601 Calabgan 496 Calangcuasan 1,099 Calantas 1,799 Culat 630 Dibet 971 Esperanza 458 Lual 1,482 Marikit 609 Tabas 1,007 Tinib 765 National Statistics Office 1 2010 Census of Population and Housing Aurora Total Population by Province, City, Municipality and Barangay: as of May 1, 2010 Province, City, Municipality Total and Barangay Population Bianuan 3,440 Cozo 1,618 Dibacong 2,374 Ditinagyan 587 Esteves 1,786 San Ildefonso 1,100 DILASAG 15,683 Diagyan 2,537 Dicabasan 677 Dilaguidi 1,015 Dimaseset 1,408 Diniog 2,331 Lawang 379 Maligaya (Pob.) 1,801 Manggitahan 1,760 Masagana (Pob.) 1,822 Ura 712 Esperanza 1,241 DINALUNGAN 10,988 Abuleg 1,190 Zone I (Pob.) 1,866 Zone II (Pob.) 1,653 Nipoo (Bulo) 896 Dibaraybay 1,283 Ditawini 686 Mapalad 812 Paleg 971 Simbahan 1,631 DINGALAN 23,554 Aplaya 1,619 Butas Na Bato 813 Cabog (Matawe) 3,090 Caragsacan 2,729 National Statistics Office 2 2010 Census of Population and
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Benefits of No-Take Zones
    1 Preface This report was commissioned by the Wildlife Conservation Society to support a three-year project aimed at expanding the area of no-take, or replenishment, zones to at least 10% of the territorial sea of Belize by the end of 2015. It is clear from ongoing efforts to expand Belize’s no-take zones that securing support for additional fishery closures requires demonstrating to fishers and other stakeholders that such closures offer clear and specific benefits to fisheries – and to fishers. Thus, an important component of the national expansion project has been to prepare a synthesis report of the performance of no-take zones, in Belize and elsewhere, in replenishing fisheries and conserving biodiversity, with the aim of providing positive examples, elucidating the factors contributing to positive results, and developing scientific arguments and data that can be used to generate and sustain stakeholder support for no-take expansion. To this end, Dr. Craig Dahlgren, a recognized expert in marine protected areas and fisheries management, with broad experience in the Caribbean, including Belize, was contracted to prepare this synthesis report. The project involved an in-depth literature review of no-take areas and a visit to Belize to conduct consultations with staff of the Belize Fisheries Department, marine reserve managers, and fishermen, collect information and national data, and identify local examples of benefits of no-take areas. In November 2013, Dr. Dahlgren presented his preliminary results to the Replenishment Zone Project Steering Committee, and he subsequently incorporated feedback received from Steering Committee members and WCS staff in this final report.
    [Show full text]
  • Iloilo Case Study
    Case study Mobilizing Social Capital for Social Service Delivery in Marginalized Coastal Communities in the Province of Iloilo Jessica Asne Dator-Bercilla Poverty has always been a socioeconomic issue in the Philippines. The task of poverty alleviation is deemed the concern of government, nongovernment organizations, and donor agencies. That communities—the more immediate stakeholders in any development process—play a critical role in development, not only as mere beneficiaries but also as partners and leaders in the development process, is often overlooked. This case study focuses on the community as a critical link to development. A multi-axial framework of analysis serves as guidepost in presenting the case study. A paradigm towards a social development that encompasses geographical, ecological, economic, social, and cultural dimensions is used. It departs from an economic-biased perspective of resource mobilization for social development. It weaves together aspects of development that were once treated as if they were mutually exclusive categories. Perhaps the most significant contribution of the study is the focus it gives to social capital as a force in social and economic development. There are numerous theories proposing that social networks or aggregations of people for a particular purpose create a stock of facilitating and cooperating social arrangements, roughly referred to as social capital. In particular, these are social arrangements that would likely lead to an accumulation of a social stock that allow for the exchange of and access to goods, services, and entitlements that may subsequently contribute to the general welfare and to the improvement in the quality of life of a community (Massam and Dickinson 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Newletter No30 AUG 2017 Draft 5
    DISPATCH CEBU ISSUE NO. 30 AUGUST 2017 Air Juan holds press launch, adds 2 new routes from CEB Departure Flight Crew of Cebu-Maasin Local airline Air Juan (AO) held a press launch at Mactan Cebu International Airport last August 1. Air Juan President Mr. John Gutierrez, Marketing Head Mr. Paolo Misa and seaplane pilot Mr. Mark Griffin answered questions from the media, together with GMCAC Chief Commercial Advisor Mr. Ravi Saravu. Air Juan does not compete with the bigger airlines, rather it connects the smaller islands. They want to be known for their seaplanes, which they also plan to operate in Cebu soon. Cake Cutting Ceremony Q&A with Press L-R: Air Juan Seaplane Pilot Mr. Mark Griffin, Air Juan President Mr. John Gutierrez, GMCAC Chief Commercial Advisor Mr. Ravi Saravu, Air Juan Marketing Head Mr. Paolo Misa. The press event coincided with the maiden flight of its new route from Cebu to Maasin, Leyte. Air Juan also launched Cebu to Sipalay in Negros on August 3. They now operate 6 routes from Cebu, including the tourist destinations of Tagbilaran (Bohol), Siquijor, Bantayan Island and Biliran. Departure Water Cannon Salute of 1st Commercial Flight (Cebu-Caticlan) PAL introduces new Q400 NG aircraft Mactan Cebu International Airport welcomed the arrival of Philippine Airlines’ new Bombardier Q400 Next Generation aircraft last August 1. PAL Express President Mr. Bonifacio Sam and Bombardier Director for Asia Pacific Sales Mr. Aman Kochher, among other VIP guests and media, graced the sendoff ceremony of the aircraft’s 1st commercial flight bound for Caticlan (Boracay).
    [Show full text]
  • How Filipinos Opposed the Japanese Occupation (1942–1945) Jeremiah L
    Mānoa Horizons Volume 4 | Issue 1 Article 2 9-20-2019 Guns, Art, and Empathy: How Filipinos Opposed the Japanese Occupation (1942–1945) Jeremiah L. Bonilla University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa Follow this and additional works at: https://kahualike.manoa.hawaii.edu/horizons Part of the Other Languages, Societies, and Cultures Commons Recommended Citation Bonilla, Jeremiah L. (2019) "Guns, Art, and Empathy: How Filipinos Opposed the Japanese Occupation (1942–1945)," Mānoa Horizons: Vol. 4 : Iss. 1 , Article 2. Available at: https://kahualike.manoa.hawaii.edu/horizons/vol4/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Kahualike. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mānoa Horizons by an authorized editor of Kahualike. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Guns, Art, and Empathy How Filipinos Opposed the Japanese Occupation (1942–1954) Jeremiah L. Bonilla Independent research through Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program Grant Mentor: Dr. Kristi Govella As Japan occupied the Philippines from 1942 to 1945, anti-Japanese sentiment among Filipino civilians intensified, especially as the brutal Japanese soldiers policed and coerced civilians into cooperating with their new ruler. The Japanese asserted their power through public atrocities directed toward civilians and prisoners, as well as through the imple- mentation of mass censorship to ease the dissemination of propaganda, promote Asiatic identity and association, and prevent the spread of Western ideas. In this paper, I argue that Filipino civilians found ways of expressing opposition to the Japanese during the occupation period: by (1) joining and participating in the activities of the Hukbo ng Bayan Laban sa Hapon (People’s Anti-Japanese Liberation Army) or Hukbalahap, (2) conveying symbolic messages of opposition through various forms of artistic expression, and (3) empathetically providing sustenance and support to American soldiers.
    [Show full text]
  • Socio-Economics of Trawl Fisheries in Southeast Asia and Papua New Guinea
    Socio-economics of trawl fisheries in Sout ISSN 2070-6103 50 FAO FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE PROCEEDINGS FAO FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE PROCEEDINGS 50 50 Socio-economics of trawl fisheries in Southeast Asia and Papua New Guinea Proceedings of the Regional Workshop on Trawl Fisheries Socio-economics 26-27 October 2015 Da Nang, Vietnam Socio-economics of trawl and Socio-economic Write-shop 25-26 April 2016 fisheries in Southeast Asia and Cha Am, Thailand Socio-economic surveys were carried out in pilot sites in Papua New Guinea (Gulf of Papua Prawn Fishery), Philippines (Samar Sea), Papua New Guinea Thailand (Trat and Chumphon) and Viet Nam (Kien Giang) under the project, Strategies for trawl fisheries bycatch management (REBYC-II CTI), funded by the Global Environment Facility and executed by FAO. In Indonesia, no study was conducted owing to the ban on trawl Proceedings of the Regional Workshop on Trawl Fisheries Socio-economics fisheries beginning January 2015. However, a paper based on key 26-27 October 2015 informant interviews was prepared. The socio-economic studies were Da Nang, Viet Nam undertaken to understand the contribution of trawl fisheries to food and security and livelihoods and determine the potential impacts of Socio-economic Write-shop management measures on stakeholder groups. Among the 25-26 April 2016 socio-economic information collected were the following: Cha Am, Thailand demographic structure of owners and crew; fishing practices – boat, gear, season, duration; catch composition, value chain and markets; contribution to livelihoods, food security and nutrition; role of women; heast Asia and Papua New Guinea costs and income from trawling; catch/income sharing arrangements; linkages with other sectors; and perceptions – resources, participation, compliance and the future.
    [Show full text]