Bridges across Oceans Initial Impact Assessment of the Philippines Nautical Highway System and Lessons for Southeast Asia
April 2010 0 2010 Asian Development Bank
All rights reserved. Published 2010. Printed in the Philippines
ISBN 978-971-561-896-0 Publication Stock No. RPT101731
Cataloging-In-Publication Data
Bridges across Oceans: Initial Impact Assessment of the Philippines Nautical Highway System and Lessons for Southeast Asia. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank, 2010.
1. Transport Infrastructure. 2. Southeast Asia. I. Asian Development Bank.
The views expressed in this book are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent.
ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use.
By making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area, or by using the term “country” in this document, ADB does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
ADB encourages printing or copying information exclusively for personal and noncommercial use with proper acknowledgment of ADB. Users are restricted from reselling, redistributing, or creating derivative works for commercial purposes without the express, written consent of ADB.
Note: In this report, “$” refers to US dollars.
6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines Tel +63 2 632 4444 Fax +63 2 636 2444 www.adb.org
For orders, please contact: Department of External Relations Fax +63 2 636 2648 [email protected] Table of Contents
Abbreviations v
Foreword vi
Acknowledgments vii
Introduction 1 The Regional Context of the Study 1 The Philippines Context 2
Philippines Ro-Ro: Concept, Policy Process, and Framework 4 The Ro-Ro Concept 4 Policy Process 4 The Ro-Ro Policy and Regulatory Framework 6 Conclusion 8
An Initial Assessment of the Economic Impact of Ro-Ro in the Philippines 9 The Philippine Ro-Ro Network 9 Impact on the Structure and Operations of the Maritime Industry 9 Impact on Passenger Mobility 11 Impact on Cargo Mobility 12 Impact on Transport Costs 14 Impact on Logistics, Operations, and Strategy 19 Impact on Local Area Development 22 The Roxas, Oriental Mindoro Experience 22 Impact on Tourism 28 Impact on Agricultural Productivity 29
Impact Summary and Lessons 34 Impact Summary 34 Lessons for aSEA 35
References 36
Appendix Description of the Strong Republic Nautical Highway 37
iii Bridges across Oceans: List of Tables Initial Impact Assessment Table 1: Poverty Incidence Levels in Selected Poorest Provinces in the Philippines 3 of the Philippines Nautical Highway System and Table 2: Increasing Cargo Handling Rates 5 Lessons for Southeast Asia Table 3: Comparative Shipping Costs within Philippine Islands and the Region 5 Table 4: Domestic Cargo Handling Rate Increases 15 Table 5: Comparative Cost of Conventional Shipping vs. Ro-Ro Shipping 15 Table 6: Cost Comparison between Conventional and Ro-Ro Shipping for San Miguel Corporation 18 Table 7: Nestlé’s Frequency of Trips per Destination 20 Table 8: Dangay Port Traffic Statistics 23 Table 9: List of Routes Serviced by Vallacar Transit 27 Table 10: Fare Comparison for the Manila–Iloilo Route Using Different Modes of Transport 29 Table 11: Northbound Movement of Agricultural Products (Panay–Luzon) 31 Table 12: Agricultural Products Passing along the Matnog–Allen Route 33
List of Figures Figure 1: Major Philippine Nautical Highways 10 Figure 2: Comparison between Containerized Shipping and Ro-Ro Shipping 11 Figure 3: Number of Passengers Using the Western Nautical Highway 12 Figure 4: Number of Shipcalls in the Western Nautical Highway 13 Figure 5: Number of Vehicles Passing through the Western Nautical Highway 13
iv Abbreviations
ADB Asian Development Bank aSEA Archipelagic Southeast Asia ATS Aboitiz Transport System
CO2 carbon dioxide DOH Department of Health DOTC Department of Transportation and Communications EO Executive Order KFC Kentucky Fried Chicken Lo-Lo load-on/load-off
LCO2 liquid carbon dioxide LGU local government unit MARINA Maritime Industry Authority PPA Philippine Ports Authority Ro-Ro Roll-on/roll-off RRTS Ro-Ro Ferry Terminal System SMC San Miguel Corporation SMEC Southern Marine Economic Corridor TAF The Asia Foundation USAID United States Agency for International Development
v Foreword
The archipelagic region of Southeast Asia, comprising 24,000 islands, is unique in the world in its development challenges. Economic growth centers are few and most of the islands have remained isolated from mainstream economic growth and are mired in poverty. Economic activities are at low levels and many social services are primitive. Most islands rely on poor, infrequent transport services, which are often unreliable.
Physical isolation is the most pressing development challenge that these islands are facing. Yet, connecting islands in the traditional manner through increased shipping services, has proven to be almost prohibitive in costs, in terms of investments in ports and facilities, and the subsidies needed to provide a minimum standard of service.
The development of the Philippines Nautical Highway system—using roll-on/roll-off vessels— shows that there is hope for the millions of poor in archipelagic Southeast Asia. The development of the system started in 2003, with the issuance of a presidential order following lengthy but healthy discussions among different interest groups. Once the order was signed, the system developed rapidly, and today consists of three main north–south trunks and numerous lateral connections.
The initial impact of this policy reform measure has been encouraging. Transport costs have been reduced, as have transit times of goods, and the frequency of deliveries has increased. Businesses have started to change their business models, farmers in isolated areas now have enhanced market access, business activities have increased on islands where there was hardly any before, local government revenues have increased, and tourism has expanded.
Importantly, the system has developed with limited amounts of public investment. Port facilities needed are minimal compared to traditional ports, and most of the investments have come from the private sector, in vessels, buses, trucks, and in some cases ports. Of course, there remains a pressing need to continuously upgrade and maintain the road system, and in due course invest in other infrastructure, but this is becoming affordable as a result of the increased economic activity.
This report presents the findings of an initial impact study conducted by the Asian Development Bank in collaboration with The Asia Foundation. The purpose is to show that relatively simple policy reforms in the area of sea transport can have large positive impacts on the lives of millions of poor who now live in isolation. The lesson for archipelagic Southeast Asia is that policy reforms allowing the introduction of roll-on/roll-off transport systems, coupled with small public investments, could also have material impact on regional economies. The Asian Development Bank hopes to contribute to the public policy debate and related changes through this report.
Kunio Senga Director General Southeast Asia Regional Department Asian Development Bank
vi Acknowledgments
This report was prepared by a team from the Asian Development Bank (ADB) and The Asia Foundation (TAF), comprising Enrico L. Basilio (TAF), Barend Frielink (ADB), Jeremiah Acena, Rafael Hernandez, and Jaime Faustino (TAF). Valuable comments were provided by Nina Merchant and Steve Rood (TAF), as well as Myles Buerano (ADB consultant).
vii
Introduction
The Regional Context of the Study trade using larger and larger vessels, and the introduction of containerized trade. Today, Archipelagic Southeast Asia (aSEA)1 has a most trade between aSEA and other regions, unique geography characterized by more and within aSEA, is through a limited number than 24,000 islands and long distances. Even of ports. Shipping even through these ports is Peninsular Malaysia has many archipelagic constrained in Indonesia and the Philippines by characteristics compared to the mainland difficulties in land transport access. economies. This geography demands a special approach to connectivity—to the ability to Eastern Indonesia and the southern Philippines move goods and people, and to travel and are therefore dependent on shipments from undertake other transport services.2 On many their respective capitals in non-containerized islands, businesses face prohibitive transport vessels, incurring high transshipment and costs to larger, especially international markets. transit costs in the process.3 In BIMP-EAGA,4 for Small, local markets limit economies of example, there are 33 designated secondary scale, growth, and economic opportunities. ports. Most of these ports have poor facilities, In addition, national and local policy and are not well connected to the hinterland regulatory environments differ widely between because of the poor quality of roads, and and within countries, providing additional are serviced by smaller vessels. In fact, while disincentives for the private sector to operate. Singapore’s fleet is large and new, the Philippines and Indonesia rely on small, aging As with all archipelagos, the people of aSEA vessels, especially for transport within the have always engaged in seafaring trade respective nations. activities with neighboring islands, and this is ongoing. For example, there is regular trading An Association of Southeast Asian Nations of local products between Mindanao and (ASEAN) study5 concluded that the greatest Sulawesi, much of it not recorded. Trading with obstacle to competitiveness is fragmented partners outside the region was not confined markets, which raise the cost of doing to the main centers: the Dutch, for example, business. Most companies in aSEA operate in sent their trading ships to numerous ports in only one country; few target Southeast Asia as what is now Indonesia. The same applied to a whole. The study noted critical ways in which traders from China in the whole aSEA region. Southeast Asian economies are hampered This changed with modern international by difficulties in moving goods, including
1 aSEA comprises Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Singapore, and Timor-Leste. 2 Green, David, and John Cooney. 2008. Building Bridges across the Ocean: Connectivity, Trade, Transit and Traffic in Maritime Southeast Asia. Paper presented at the Maritime Connectivity Workshop, Asian Institute of Management, Manila, 10 November. 3 Isolated places which export bulk commodities such as ore and coal often have berthing facilities for larger ships to load the goods for export, but these are often highly specialized facilities, not suitable for other cargo. 4 Brunei-Indonesia-Malaysia-Philippines East ASEAN Growth Area, roughly comprising eastern Indonesia, eastern Malaysia, southern Philippines, and Brunei. 5 McKinsey & Company. 2003. ASEAN Competitiveness Study.
1 Bridges across Oceans: high transport costs and widely divergent investment climate. Developing the SMEC Initial Impact Assessment customs, immigration, quarantine, and security would not need large upfront investments, of the Philippines Nautical Highway System and procedures, and other nontariff barriers. This as it can be developed in a modular fashion. Lessons for Southeast Asia is compounded by forms of contract and Importantly, policy dialogue with the various documentation that discourage multimodal stakeholders (in existing and proposed trade.6 Often, customs and health authorities arrangements) would be needed to lay the are very recluctant to allow inland clearance of necessary foundations. goods with an inland origin or destination. The Philippines nautical highway system Stimulating broad-based economic growth, is relatively new; it has been developing reducing poverty, and improving the welfare of rapidly since the first presidential orders people inhabiting the numerous remote islands were issued in 2003. The Center for Research of aSEA is a major challenge, the solution and Communication, together with The to which starts with improved connectivity. Asia Foundation and United States Agency Connecting 24,000 islands, most of which have for International Development (USAID), poor infrastructure, productive capacity, and has published a detailed description of the natural resources, is not easy. The Philippines’ development of the system.7 This report aims model of “nautical highways,” which has to contribute to the regional policy debate resulted in seamless connectivity from north to on connectivity, by presenting initial evidence south across seas and islands, is seen as having of the beneficial impact of the roll-on/roll-off great potential for aSEA. In theory, the region (Ro-Ro) system, and to draw lessons from the offers numerous possibilities for such nautical Philippines experience for the aSEA region. highways, but only detailed discussions with national and local governments and the private sector can result in meaningful highways The Philippines Context that actually work. For the moment, the as yet hypothetical Southern Marine Economic Inter-island shipping in an archipelagic Corridor (SMEC) serves as a model to think economy like the Philippines is a critical element through this approach. The SMEC runs from of development and poverty reduction. It Jakarta eastwards through Bali and Lombok, facilitates 98% of domestic inter-island trade— through other islands, including Timor-Leste, to roughly 80 million tons of cargoes annually the island of New Guinea and Port Moresby. (including agri-fishery products). It also facilitates the movement of more than 40 Experience with Greater Mekong Subregion million Filipinos as well as foreign tourists. (GMS) economic corridors, and with the Furthermore, countryside development and Philippine nautical highways, has shown that addressing rural poverty requires an efficient the approach has many benefits. Notably, the logistics and transportation network between network effects from linking a chain of islands the economic growth hubs (Manila, Cebu, etc.) could be considerable. Very few would be and the underdeveloped rural provinces. expected to drive from Jakarta to Port Moresby, but linking islands within such a network The absence of connectivity among the would stimulate trade between neighboring various Philippine “island economies” is an islands, promote economic activity, and reduce important factor contributing to poverty and transaction costs significantly. Lowered shipping underdevelopment. Five of the 10 poorest costs and improved timeliness in the delivery provinces in the country fall under the category of products are important in enhancing the of “island provinces” (Table 1).
6 Carruthers, Robin, Jitendra Bajpai, and David Hummels. 2003. Trade and Logistics: An East Asian Perspective. In East Asia Integrates: A Trade Policy Agenda for Shared Growth, ed. Kathie Krumm and Homi Kharas. Washington, DC: World Bank. 7 Basillio, Enrico L. 2008. Linking the Philippine Islands through the Highways of the Sea. Manila: Center for Research and Communication Foundation.
2 Table 1: Poverty Incidence Levels in Selected translates into low incomes for farmers and Introduction Poorest Provinces in the Philippines (%) fishers. Moreover, inefficiencies and high transport costs exacerbate the problem. Province Poverty Incidence (%) Sulu (ARMM) 63 In 2003, the Government of the Philippines Masbate 63 issued a policy to promote Ro-Ro, a system designed to carry rolling stock cargo which Tawi-Tawi 56 does not require cranes for loading or off- Romblon 55 loading. Because this eliminates cargo-handling Camiguin 53 labor and equipment, and reduces the amount ARMM = Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao. of time required to be in port, reductions in sea transport costs can be considerable. Due to Source: National Statistical Coordinating Board. the introduction of the Ro-Ro policy, transport costs have been significantly reduced. The The isolation and lack of connectivity of island principal sources of savings have been the provinces does not allow them to share the elimination of cargo handling charges and benefits of trade. The absence of connections wharfage fees. with other islands (where larger markets exist) serves as a major constraint on economic and The remainder of the report will discuss the social interaction and integration. There are evolution of the Philippines Ro-Ro policy, limited incentives to increase production and followed by a presentation of the findings of farm productivity (mainly agricultural products) the impact study. Finally, some lessons for the as their markets remain relatively small. This aSEA region are presented.
3 Philippines Ro-Ro: Concept, Policy Process, and Framework
The Ro-Ro Concept cargo handling charges as a major factor in the high cost of domestic logistics transportation. Prior to the inception of the Ro-Ro policy, the Little development took place after the studies predominant method for shipping was the were completed, mainly because of the lack load-on/load-off (Lo-Lo) system. In the Lo-Lo of interest on the part of the Philippines system or conventional liner system, goods Ports Authority (PPA). While the PPA had were shipped in containers and were loaded the sole power to set cargo handling rates, and off-loaded by cranes and other dock it also received a percentage of the cargo equipment. This presented significant cargo handling fees collected. In a manner probably handling and wharfage costs. Usually, cargo unintended by policy makers, the port authority handling charges are priced on a per unit basis had a conflict of interest as it approved rates in such as per sack, per crate, etc. Wharfage is the which it had a financial interest. Domestic cargo fee paid by the shipper for using the port area. handling fees continuously increased as a result Conventional ships still use this method today. (Table 2).
Ro-Ro is a system designed to carry rolling stock At the same time, there was increasingly strong cargo which does not require cranes for loading private sector support for the Ro-Ro concept. or off-loading. Because the cargoes are rolling At the regional level, the business community cargoes—i.e., cars, buses, trucks, etc.—which in Mindanao was particularly active. Many simply roll on and off the Ro-Ro ships, Ro-Ro could not understand why it was less expensive does not require cargo handling services. This to ship to Manila from Hong Kong, China or eliminates cargo handling labor and equipment, Bangkok than it was from Mindanao (Table 3). and reduces the amount of time required to be in a port which can lead to considerable The Mindanao business community, including reductions in sea transport costs. the Mindanao Business Council, Federation of Mindanao Shippers’ Associations, and Northern Mindanao Shippers’ Association, Policy Process advocated a Ro-Ro policy that would allow and encourage private sector investments A number of studies, some dating to the early in the development and operation of Ro-Ro 1990s, have recommended the extensive use of terminals and ships. The various chambers Ro-Ro shipping as the most appropriate mode submitted resolutions to the President of the of inter-island transport for an archipelagic Philippines at several conferences organized economy like the Philippines.8 The studies in Mindanao—i.e., Mindanao Food Summit, identified both the cost and inefficiency of Mindanao Business Conference, and Mindanao
8 These studies include those prepared by Nathan Associates, 1991 (USAID), Japan International Cooperation Agency, 1991 (JICA), and SHIPDECO, 1992 (Norway).
4 Table 2: Increasing Cargo Handling Rates Philippines Ro-Ro: Concept, Policy Process Domestic Foreign and Framework Arrastre Stevedoring Arrastre Stevedoring Year (%) (%) (%) (%) 1998 12 40 8 40 1999 0 0 20 0 2000 10 10 8 8 2001 10 10 10 15 2002 0 0 10 10 Source: Philippine Ports Authority.
Table 3: Comparative Shipping Costs within Philippine Islands and the Region
MNL-DVO HK-MNL BANGKOK-MNL KLANG-MNL Freight (in US$) 622 250 600 675 Distance (in nautical miles) 519 619 1,189 1,343 Sailing time (no. of days) 1.5 1.5 8 8 Freight/nautical mile (in US$) 1.20 0.40 0.50 0.50
MNL = Manila, HK = Hong Kong, China, Klang = Port Klang, Malaysia. Source: G. Llanto and E. Basilio. 2005. World Bank-PIDS Study on Ports and Shipping.
Shippers Conference—requesting the issuance government partners, was key to the policy of a Ro-Ro policy to address the high cost success. The president issued the Ro-Ro policy of transport from Mindanao to Luzon. The Executive Order (EO) 170 on 22 January 2003. recommendations gained broader support from the national business organizations such On 9 June 2003, the president further as the Philippine Chamber of Commerce and expanded the scope of the Ro-Ro policy Industry, Federation of Philippine Industries, by lifting the 50 nautical mile limit (EO Supply Chain Management Association of 170-A). This was originally a concession to the Philippines, Export Development Council, large shipping companies, cargo handling Confederation of Philippine Exporters and companies, and unions during the policy Importers, and Employers Confederation of the discussions. By lifting the limit, the Ro-Ro policy Philippines. was now applicable to any point in the country. Other additional policy changes included There was also increasingly strong support the creation of dedicated lanes for Ro-Ro for the Ro-Ro policy by key government Ferry Terminal System (RRTS) shipping service agencies. The principal supporters within the providers to ensure efficiency at the terminals, government included the National Economic covered passenger terminal and waiting areas Development Authority, Department of provided in the port area for the safety and Agriculture, Department of Environment and comfort of passengers, and the establishment Natural Resources, Department of Interior and of a quick method for determining the Local Government, and Development Bank of appropriate lane meter classification of rolling the Philippines. The flexibility of donor project vehicles and cargoes. support was also critical to the success of the reform initiative. USAID grant assistance to In September 2005, the president issued policy institutes to inform the reform coalition, another amendment (EO 17O-B) to the Ro-Ro including private sector and non-traditional policy “allowing the conversion of private non-
5 Bridges across Oceans: Initial Impact Assessment Box 1: Additional Provisions in the Implementing Rules and Regulations of EO 170-A of the Philippines Nautical Highway System and The Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) of EO 170-A amended and incorporated additional Lessons for Southeast Asia provisions such as: