DOCSLIB.ORG

S Poland Criteria (Table 1)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Important Bird Areas in Europe – Poland ■ POLAND MACIEJ GROMADZKI AND MARIA WIELOCH Bia³owie¿a forest (IBA 031). (PHOTO: PAWE£ OLAF SID£O) GENERAL INTRODUCTION from 1989 that still meet current IBA criteria are largely unchanged in extent, although the numbering system and many of the site Poland covers about 312,700 km2 within the temperate forest zone names have been altered. of Europe. It is a low-lying country, with only 9% of its land surface above 300 m, although mountain ranges in the south (dominated by the Western Carpathians) rise up to a maximum of 2,499 m. ORNITHOLOGICAL IMPORTANCE Poland has a population of 38,612,000 (1996 estimate), with a moderate overall population density of 124 people per km2, the A total of 128 species of European conservation concern (SPEC) highest densities being in the southern upland areas and the lowest breed regularly in Poland (Tucker and Heath 1994). In addition, in the north-west and north-east. 24 SPECs do not breed but are regular visitors to the country on A total of 77 Important Bird Areas (IBAs) are currently passage or in winter. recognised in Poland, covering 19,867 km2 or equivalent to about Six species of global conservation concern breed in Poland 6.4% of the land surface (Table 1). The IBAs are distributed more (Table 2)—Aythya nyroca, Haliaeetus albicilla, Aquila clanga, Crex or less evenly over the whole country, but with a preponderance in crex, Gallinago media and Acrocephalus paludicola. The most the east and north. The previous pan-European IBA inventory important site for Aythya nyroca is the Barycz river valley (site 054), (Grimmett and Jones 1989) listed 126 sites for Poland—thus, a where 20–30% of the national population breed. All of the breeding relatively large number of these have since lost their IBA status Aquila clanga in Poland nest in the Biebrza river valley (site 025), (see Table 1), especially since 19 of the current 77 sites are as do most of the national population of Acrocephalus paludicola completely new IBAs. This is mainly because the IBA criteria have (Table 2). The number of breeding Crex crex in Poland, currently been revised since 1989—only a few of the 1989 sites have lost their estimated at about 30,000 calling males (1997 survey), represents a IBA status because of actual changes in bird numbers at the site. major proportion of the European total, and this species played a Apart from amalgamations of previous IBAs (thirteen now form very important role in identifying IBAs during previous inventories part of current sites 025, 054, 061 and 073), most of the other 54 sites (Grimmett and Jones 1989; Gromadzki et al. 1994). Table 1. Summary of Important Bird Areas in Poland 77 IBAs covering 19,867 km2 IBA National 1989 code code 1 code International name National name Administrative region Area (ha) Criteria (see p. 11) 001 001 PL001 Delta of the Œwina river Delta Œwiny zachodnio-pomorskie 4,000 A1, A4i, A4iii, B1i, B2, B3 002 002 PL005 Szczecin lagoon Zalew Szczecinski zachodnio-pomorskie 48,000 A1, A4i, A4iii, B1i, B2 003 004 PL007 Rozwarowo marshes Bagna Rozwarowskie zachodnio-pomorskie 1,600 A1 004 008 PL009 Œwidwie lake Jezioro Œwidwie zachodnio-pomorskie 900 A4i, B1i 005 010 PL011 We³tyñ lakes Jeziora We³tyñskie zachodnio-pomorskie 4,600 B3 006 009 PL010 Lower Odra river valley Dolina Dolnej Odry zachodnio-pomorskie, lubuskie 75,000 A1, A4i, A4iii, B1i, B1iv, B2, B3 007 011 PL012 Miedwie lake Jezioro Miedwie zachodnio-pomorskie 3,200 A4i, B1i 543 Important Bird Areas in Europe – Poland Table 1 ... continued. Summary of Important Bird Areas in Poland 77 IBAs covering 19,867 km2 IBA National 1989 code code 1 code International name National name Administrative region Area (ha) Criteria (see p. 11) 008 021 PL013 Iñsk Landscape Park Iñski Park Krajobrazowy zachodnio-pomorskie 17,763 A1, B3 009 013 PL019 S³owiñski National Park S³owiñski Park Narodowy pomorskie 18,247 A4i, B1i 010 023 PL018 S³upia Valley Landscape Park Park Krajobrazowy Dolina S³upi pomorskie 37,040 A1 011 025 — Middle part of Tuchola forest Wielki Sandr Brdy pomorskie 38,815 B1i, B2, B3 012 015, 016 PL022 Puck Bay Zatoka Pucka pomorskie 56,000 A4i, A4iii, B1i 013 017 PL023 Wis³a river mouth Ujscie Wis³y pomorskie 485 A1, A4i, A4iii, B1i, B2 014 018 PL024 Wis³a lagoon Zalew Wiœlany pomorskie, warmiñsko-mazurskie 33,000 A4i, A4iii, B1i 015 019 PL025 Dru¿no lake Jezioro Dru¿no warmiñsko-mazurskie 3,021 A4i, A4iii, B1i, B2 016 027 PL026 I³awa forests Lasy I³awskie warmiñsko-mazurskie 25,279 A1, A4i, B1i, B2, B3 017 047 PL109 Dymerskie meadows £¹ki Dymerskie warmiñsko-mazurskie 300 A4i, B1i 018 045 PL111 Napiwodzko-Ramucka forest Puszcza Napiwodzko-Ramucka warmiñsko-mazurskie 65,000 A1, B1i, B2, B3 019 020 PL104 Oœwin lake Jezioro Oœwin warmiñsko-mazurskie 2,500 B3 020 050 PL103 Borecka forest Puszcza Borecka warmiñsko-mazurskie 22,000 B2, B3 021 048 PL108 £uknajno lake Jezioro £uknajno warmiñsko-mazurskie 710 A4i, A4iii, B1i, B2, B3 022 051 PL106 Nietlickie marshes Bagna Nietlickie warmiñsko-mazurskie 1,200 A1, A4i, B1i, B1iv, B2, B3 023 — — Pisz forest Puszcza Piska warmiñsko-mazurskie, podlaskie 163,000 A1, B2 024 053 — Augustów forest Puszcza Augustowska podlaskie 102,000 B2, B3 025 083 PL100– Biebrza river valley Dolina Biebrzy podlaskie 126,047 A1, A4i, B1i, B2, B3 PL102 026 084 — Narew river gaps Prze³omowa Dolina Narwi podlaskie 4,200 A1, B2 027 085 PL098 Marshy valley of the Narew river Bagienna Dolina Narwi podlaskie 9,332 A1, B2, B3 028 086 PL099 Knyszyñ forest Puszcza Knyszyñska podlaskie 110,000 B2, B3 029 087 — Gródek—Micha³owo basin Niecka Gródecko—Micha³owska podlaskie 4,700 A1, B2 030 088 — Upper Narew river valley Dolina Górnej Narwi podlaskie 8,400 A1, B2, B3 031 089 PL097 Bia³owie¿a forest Puszcza Bia³owieska podlaskie 62,500 A1, B2, B3 032 030 PL039 Warta flood-plain—S³oñsk Rozlewiska Warty—S³oñsk lubuskie 4,244 A1, A4i, A4iii, B1i, B2, B3 033 031 PL035 Noteæ river flood-plain Nadnoteckie £êgi wielkopolskie 10,000 A1 034 040 PL033 Obra river flood-plain Wielki £êg Obrzañski wielkopolskie 16,000 B2 035 041 PL045 Wonieœæ reservoir Zbiornik Wonieœæ wielkopolskie 900 B2 036 066 PL031 Middle Warta river valley Dolina Warty Œrodkowej wielkopolskie 32,000 A1, A4iii, B2, B3 037 032 — Ostrówek and Smogulec ponds Stawy Ostrówek i Smogulec kujawsko-pomorskie, 1,000 B1i wielkopolskie 038 033 — Œlesin and Wystêp ponds Stawy Œlesin i Wystêp kujawsko-pomorskie 3,200 A4i, B1i 039 — — Lower Wis³a river Dolina Dolnej Wis³y pomorskie, kujawsko-pomorskie 32,000 A1, A4i, A4iii, B1i, B2 040 029 — Marshy valley of the Drwêca river Bagienna Dolina Drwêcy kujawsko-pomorskie 3,400 B1i 041 042 PL034 Gop³o Millennium Park Nadgoplañski Park Tysi¹clecia kujawsko-pomorskie, 12,700 A4i, A4iii, B1i, B2 wielkopolskie 042 044 PL028 Rakutowskie swamps Blota Rakutowskie kujawsko-pomorskie 800 A4iii, B1i 043 — PL029 Ner river valley Dolina Neru wielkopolskie, ³ódzkie 4,800 A1 044 067 — Jeziorsko reservoir Zbiornik Jeziorsko wielkopolskie, ³ódzkie 4,300 A4i, B1i 045 060 PL122 Kampinos forest Puszcza Kampinoska mazowieckie 35,700 A1, B2, B3 046 061 PL086 Middle Wis³a river valley Dolina Œrodkowej Wis³y lubelskie, mazowieckie 19,000 A1, A4i, A4iii, B1i, B2 047 058 PL120 Zegrzyñski reservoir Zalew Zegrzyñski mazowieckie 12,000 A4iii, B1i 048 — PL114 Omulew river valley Dolina Omulwi mazowieckie 6,000 A1, B2 049 059 PL121 Bia³a forest Puszcza Bia³a mazowieckie 120,000 A1, B2 050 063 PL094 Liwiec river valley Dolina Liwca mazowieckie 11,800 A1, B2 051 065 PL095 Lower Bug river valley Dolina Dolnego Bugu lubelskie, mazowieckie, podlaskie 55,000 A1, B2 052 055 PL044 Przemków ponds Stawy Przemkowskie dolnoœl¹skie 1,046 A4iii, B2 053 078 PL046 Odra riverine forests £êgi Odrzañskie dolnoœl¹skie 18,000 A1, B2, B3 054 072–077 PL047– Barycz river valley Dolina Baryczy wielkopolskie, dolnoœl¹skie 25,700 A1, A4iii, B1i, B2, B3 PL052 055 ——S³up reservoir Zbiornik S³up dolnoœl¹skie 500 A4i, B1i 056 — — Mietków reservoir Zbiornik Mietkowski dolnoœl¹skie 920 A4i, B1i 057 079 PL053 Oak-hornbeam forests Gr¹dy Odrzanskie opolskie, dolnoœl¹skie 31,000 B2, B3 in the Odra valley 058 080 PL057 Turawa reservoir Jezioro Turawskie opolskie 2,200 A4iii 059 101 PL054 Otmuchów reservoir Jezioro Otmuchowskie opolskie 2,300 A4i, A4iii, B1i 060 102 PL055 Nysa reservoir Jezioro Nyskie (Glêbinowskie) opolskie 3,000 A4i, A4iii, B1i 061 108, 109 PL060, Upper Wis³a river valley Dolina Górnej Wis³y œlaskie, malopolskie 130,000 A4i, A4iii, B1i, B2 PL061 062 — — Middle Nida flood-plain Rozlewiska Œrodkowej Nidy œwiêtokrzyskie 2,000 A1 063 105 PL085 Ma³opolska Wis³a river gap Ma³opolski Prze³om Wis³y lubelskie, mazowieckie, 1,300 B2 œwiêtokrzyskie 064 092 PL090 Tyœmienica river valley Dolina Tyœmienicy lubelskie 14,500 A1, B2, B3 065 093 PL084 Parczew forests Lasy Parczewskie lubelskie 8,000 A1, B2 544 Important Bird Areas in Europe – Poland Table 1 ... continued. Summary of Important Bird Areas in Poland 77 IBAs covering 19,867 km2 IBA National 1989 code code 1 code International name National name Administrative region Area (ha) Criteria (see p. 11) 066 097 PL082 Bubnów marshes Bagno Bubnów lubelskie 2,104 A1, B2 067 100 — Middle Bug river valley Dolina Œrodkowego Bugu lubelskie 5,100 A1, B2, B3 068 098 PL081 Che³m calcareous marshes Che³mskie Torfowiska Wêglanowe lubelskie 1,700 A1, B2, B3 069 099 — Strzeleckie forests Lasy Strzeleckie lubelskie 8,500 B2, B3 070 110 — Niepo³omice forest Puszcza Niepo³omicka ma³opolskie 11,000 B3 071 116 PL067 Gorce mountains Gorce ma³opolskie 7,030 B2, B3 072 115 PL065 Tatra mountains Tatry ma³opolskie 21,164 A3, B2, B3 073 111 PL073, Janów forests Lasy Janowskie podkarpackie, lubelskie 50,000 B2 PL074 074 — — Solska Forest Landscape Park Park Krajobrazowy Puszczy Solskiej podkarpackie, lubelskie 28,980 B2 075 — — Przemyœl Plateau Landscape Park Park Krajobrazowy Pogórza podkarpackie 62,000 A1, B2, B3 Przemyskiego 076 112 PL080 Starzawa ponds Stawy Starzawskie podkarpackie 950 A4iii, B2 077 118 PL077 Bieszczady mountains Bieszczady podkarpackie 114,000 A1, B2, B3 1.
Recommended publications
  • Modeling and Monitoring of Hydrodynamics and Surface Water Quality in the Sulejów Dam Reservoir, Poland

    Modeling and Monitoring of Hydrodynamics and Surface Water Quality in the Sulejów Dam Reservoir, Poland

    water Article Modeling and Monitoring of Hydrodynamics and Surface Water Quality in the Sulejów Dam Reservoir, Poland Aleksandra Ziemi ´nska-Stolarska 1,* and Magdalena Kempa 2 1 Faculty of Process and Environmental Engineering, Lodz University of Technology, Wólcza´nska213 Str., 90-924 Lodz, Poland 2 Norwegian Institute for Water Research, Gaustadalléen 21 Str., 0349 Oslo, Norway; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The aim of this work is to evaluate core variables of the ecological potential of the Sulejów Reservoir (temperature distribution, flow velocities, and concentrations of selected indicators, e.g., phosphates, nitrates, the abundance of phytoplankton) using a three-dimensional hydrodynamic model, GEMSS-HDM (generalized environmental modeling system for surface waters), coupled with a water quality model, WASP EUTRO (GEMSS-WQM). The monitoring data necessary to build the model were obtained from two multiparameter probes that were submerged in two locations in the Sulejów Reservoir. An ADCP current profiler was used to collect data for hydrodynamic model calibration and verification. Total error between computed and measured velocity was estimated at 10–15%. A high concentration of chlorophyll-a during the vegetation season of 2015 (0.02 mg/L) was coupled with high water temperature (above 25 ◦C) and low concentrations of biogenic compounds (phosphorus and nitrogen at 0.02 and 0.001 mg/L, respectively). In 2015, NO3-N was the limiting nutrient in the Sulejów Reservoir. Maximum growth of algae was observed in June and July 2015 (0.02 mg/L chla) along the entire length of the reservoir; algae bloom volume reduction was observed Citation: Ziemi´nska-Stolarska,A.; in September (0.004 mg/L chla).
  • Protected Areas of the Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship

    Protected Areas of the Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship

    Environmental Protection and Natural Resources Vol. 30 No 3(81): 35-46 Ochrona Środowiska i Zasobów Naturalnych DOI 10.2478/oszn-2019-0016 Dariusz Wojdan*, Ilona Żeber-Dzikowska*, Barbara Gworek**, Katarzyna Mickiewicz ***, Jarosław Chmielewski**** Protected areas of the Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship * Uniwersytet Jana Kochanowskiego w Kielcach, ** Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie, *** Instytut Ochrony Środowiska - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy w Warszawie **** Wyższa Szkoła Rehabilitacji w Warszawie; e-mail: [email protected] Keywords: Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship, protection areas, natural objects, conservation Abstract The Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship is one of the smallest provinces in Poland, but it clearly stands out with a very well-preserved natural environment. Because of exceptional features of animate and inanimate nature, large parts of the province are covered by various forms of nature protection. There is 1 national park (NP), 72 nature reserves (NRs), 9 landscape parks, 21 protected landscape areas and 40 Natura 2000 sites within the administrative borders of the province. The most unique natural features are found in the Świętokrzyski National Park (ŚNP), but the largest surface of the province is covered by protected landscape areas. Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship is the first in Poland in terms of the share of protected areas (as much as 65.2%), strongly outdistancing other Voivodeships. Small natural objects are much more numerous than large protected areas. At present, the Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship has 705 natural monuments (NMs), 114 ecological sites (ESs), 20 documentation sites (DSs) and 17 nature and landscape complexes (NLCs). Moreover, new protected areas and sites may still be established within its borders. © IOŚ-PIB 1. INTRODUCTION [Polish Journal of Laws 2004, no.
  • Potential and Central Forms of Tourism in 21 Regions of Slovakia

    Potential and Central Forms of Tourism in 21 Regions of Slovakia

    Potential and Central Forms of Tourism in 21 Regions of Slovakia Importance and development priorities of regions The following previews list short characteristics of individual regions in terms of their current state, development possibilities and specific needs. The previews include a list of the most important destinations in the individual regions, the infrastructure that needs to be completed and the anticipated environmental impacts on tourism in the region. These lists are not entirely comprehensive and only include the main elements that create the character of the region as a tourist destination. 1. Bratislava Region Category / relevance Medium-term perspective International Long-term perspective International Sub-region, specific Medium-term perspective - Small Carpathians sub-region (viniculture) location - Bratislava - Senec Long-term perspective - Strip along the right bank of the Danube Type of tourism Long-term incoming foreign tourism over 50%; intensive domestic tourism as well Stay tourism – short-term in incoming as well as in domestic tourism Long–stay waterside tourism only in the summer time; one-day visits – domestic as well as foreign tourism. Transit Forms of tourism - Sightseeing tourism - Business tourism - Summer waterside stays Activities with the - Discovering cultural heritage – Business tourism - Congress/conference tourism – highest long-term Visiting cultural and sport events – Stays/recreation near water – Water sports – Boat potential sports and water tourism - Cycle tourism Position on the Slovak Number
  • Analyzing On-Road Emissions of Light-Duty Vehicles with Portable

    Analyzing On-Road Emissions of Light-Duty Vehicles with Portable

    Analyzing on-road emissions of light-duty vehicles with Portable Emission Measurement Systems (PEMS) Martin Weiss, Pierre Bonnel, Rudolf Hummel, Urbano Manfredi, Rinaldo Colombo, Gaston Lanappe, Philippe Le Lijour, Mirco Sculati EUR 24697 EN - 2011 The mission of the JRC-IE is to provide support to Community policies related to both nuclear and non-nuclear energy in order to ensure sustainable, secure and efficient energy production, distribution and use. European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Energy Contact information Address: Sustainable Transport Unit, Via Enrico Fermi 2749, TP 230, 21010 Ispra, Italy E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Tel.: +39-0332-78-6649; +39-0332-78-5301 Fax: +39-0332-78-6328 http://ie.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ http://www.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ Legal Notice Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of this publication. Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers or these calls may be billed. Additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet and can be accessed through the Europa server http://europa.eu/ JRC 62639 EUR 24697 EN ISBN 978-92-79-19072-8 ISSN 1018-5593 doi:10.2788/23820 Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union © European Union, 2011 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged Printed in Italy Executive summary Executive summary Emissions testing in the laboratory forms an essential part of the European type-approval procedure for light-duty vehicles.
  • Botanika – Steciana ��, ����, ��-�� ISSN ����-��

    Botanika – Steciana , , - ISSN -

    Roczniki Akademii Rolniczej w Poznaniu CCCLXXXIX Botanika – Steciana , , - www.up.poznan.pl/steciana ISSN - MACROPHYTES, CYANOBACTERIA AND ALGAE OF THE “BRODZKIE LAKE” IN THE MAŁOPOLSKA UPLAND SOUTHERN POLAND PRELIMINARY STUDY BOŻENNA MACIEJCZAK, JOANNA CZERWIK-MARCINKOWSKA B. Maciejczak, J. Czerwik-Marcinkowska, Department of Botany, Institute of Biology, The Jan Kochanowski University of Humanities and Sciences, Świętokrzyska , - Kielce, Poland, e-mail: [email protected], [email protected] (Received: September , . Accepted: April , ) ABSTRACT. The present paper provides the results of study on the macrophytes, cyanobacteria and algae of the “Brodzkie Lake” in the Małopolska Upland in southern Poland. In total, taxa (including cyano- bacteria, algae – Heterokontophyta, Dinophyta, Euglenophyta, Chlorophyta and vascular plants) have been recorded in the study area. Qualitative samples were collected in a period from March to October . All taxa were briefl y described and some water quality parameters were also analysed. KEY WORDS: lake, cyanobacteria, algae, macrophytes, bioindicators INTRODUCTION whole basin is mostly uplandish) have contributed to establishment of the Kamienna Valley Protected Land- The “Brodzkie Lake” is one of eight reservoirs con- scape Area. The most important ecological function of structed on the Kamienna River and located within this area is the protection of surface and ground wa- borders of the Staropolski Industrial District (Fig. ). ters and restoration and conservation of an ecological The Kamienna River is the second largest river of the corridor function of the Kamienna River Valley. The Świętokrzyskie Province (following the Nida River). It is Staropolski Industrial District (SID), situated in the Vis- . km long and its catchment area is . km. The tula-Pilica-Nida intefl uve, is the oldest Polish historical Kamienna River is a left tributary of the Vistula River region of industrial development with the dominating and fl ows into it on .
  • Reservoir Sedimentation Problems in the Vistula River Basin, Poland

    Reservoir Sedimentation Problems in the Vistula River Basin, Poland

    Erosion and Sediment Yield: Global and Regional Perspectives (Proceedings of the Exeter Symposium July 1996). IAHSPubl.no. 236, 1996. 501 Reservoir sedimentation problems in the Vistula River basin, Poland ADAM LAJCZAK Institute of Nature Conservation, Polish Academy of Sciences, Lubicz str. 46, 31-512 Cracow, Poland Abstract Existing knowledge of the geometric and hydrological characteristics of existing and planned dam reservoirs in the Vistula River basin, Poland, and of the spatial differentiation of suspended sediment and bed load transport in the area provides a basis for proposing appropriate locations for planned reservoirs in the river basin. If the location and the order of building of the planned dams conform to these proposals, this will result in slow silting of the reservoirs with advantages both for the use of the river as a waterway and for maximizing the useful life of the reservoirs. INTRODUCTION The correct planning of the development multipurpose reservoir systems in large river basins, where the rivers are characterized by different hydrological regimes and different suspended sediment loads and bed load yields, presents an important problem for fluvial sedimentology. Estimation of the useful lifetime of reservoirs of very diffe­ rent initial geometric and hydrological characteristics, when their functions are fulfilled, must be a prelude to the correct location of planned structures. This time period, which has been estimated for every reservoir studied according to the concept proposed, should not be shorter than the amortization time of the reservoir. The above procedure can be undertaken if the following information is available: (a) the average annual suspended sediment load and bed load as measured at successive gauging stations on the river and its tributaries over a suitable period of time; (b) the initial geometric and hydrological characteristics of existing and planned reservoirs; and (c) the initial trap efficiency for the suspended sediment load of every reservoir studied.
  • Rally Guide Breslau Poland 2

    Rally Guide Breslau Poland 2

    12.07 - 19.07.2014 RALLY GUIDE 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 WELCOME TO THE “NEW” RALLYE BRESLAU INTERNATIONAL! .............................. 2 2 ORGANISATION ............................................................................................. 3 2.1 NAME AND ADDRESS ................................................................................ 3 2.2 OFFICIALS .............................................................................................. 3 3 BRESLAU POLAND – UPDATED RALLY SCHEDULE ................................................ 4 4 CLASSES AND CATEGORIES. CLASSIFICATION. .................................................. 8 4.1 FEATURES OF THE RACING CLASSES .......................................................... 8 4.2 CLASSIFICATION ..................................................................................... 8 5 TIMEKEEPING AND GPS TRACKING ................................................................... 9 6 ENTRY DETAILS ........................................................................................... 12 6.1 PAYMENT TERMS .................................................................................... 12 7 TECHNICAL AND SAFETY REQUIREMENTS ........................................................ 12 8 REFUELLING ................................................................................................ 13 9 CAMPS ........................................................................................................ 13 9.1 GENERAL INFORMATION ........................................................................
  • Kodujemy Na Zajęciach „Klika” Płynie Wisła, Płynie, Po Polskiej Krainie

    Kodujemy Na Zajęciach „Klika” Płynie Wisła, Płynie, Po Polskiej Krainie

    W numerze Z biegiem Wisły . .................................................................................................................................................... 2 Rok 2017 to rok rzeki Wisły . ............................................................................................................................. 3 Kodujemy na zajęciach Klika .............................................................................................................................. 4 Kodujemy na zajęciach „Klika” Bez osłonek W bieżącym roku szkolnym wzięliśmy udział w dwóch wydarzeniach związanych z programowaniem. Pierwsze z nich to Code Week – Europejski Tydzień Kodowania, a drugie to Godzina Kodowania. Płynie Wisła, płynie, po polskiej krainie, Tydzień Edukacji Informatycznej jest największą inicjatywą edukacyjną. Można Zobaczyła Kraków, pewnie go nie minie, w niej uczestniczyć na lekcjach i zajęciach w szkole, jak i poza szkołą, indywidualnie lub w grupie. Zobaczyła Kraków, wnet go pokochała, Na naszych zajęciach dzieci poznawały program SCRATCH. Układały proste skrypty i obserwowały efekty swojej pracy. I w dowód miłości wstęgą opasała. Drugim wydarzeniem jest Godzina Kodowania (The Hour of Code Utwór: Od południa stoi wielka Babia Góra - autor anonimowy 1-4.12.2017). Celem tej inicjatywy jest przybliżenie uczniom informatyki w formie łamigłówek z postaciami z ich gier i zabaw, których rozwiązanie polega na ułożeniu programów z gotowych bloczków. Łamigłówki udostępniane w ramach Godziny Kodowania są bardzo interesującym i wciągającym
  • The Tatra Mts – Rocks, Landforms, Weathering and Soils Tatry – Skały, Rzeźba, Wietrzenie I Gleby

    The Tatra Mts – Rocks, Landforms, Weathering and Soils Tatry – Skały, Rzeźba, Wietrzenie I Gleby

    Geoturystyka 2 (13) 2008: 51-74 The Tatra Mts – rocks, landforms, weathering and soils Tatry – skały, rzeźba, wietrzenie i gleby Marek Drewnik1, Ireneusz Felisiak2, Irena Jerzykowska3 & Janusz Magiera2 1Jagiellonian University, Faculty of Biology and Earth Sciences; ul. Gołębia 24, 31-007 Kraków, Poland. (Institute of Geography and Spatial Management) 2AGH University of Science and Technology; Faculty of Geology, Geophysics and Environmental Protection; Al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland. 3Jagiellonian University, Faculty of Biology and Earth Sciences; ul. Gołębia 24, 31-007 Kraków, Poland. (Institute of Geological Sciences) e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Chabówka Introduction Nowy Targ The Tatra Mountains are the most prominent, the highest Szczawnica (2,655 m a.s.l.) and presently non-glaciated mountains in the Warszawa Czarny Dunajec Niedzica Central Europe, located approximately halfway between the Baltic Sea and the Adriatic Sea, and between the Atlantic Zakopane Ocean and the Ural Mts. Thus, they occupy a transitional Kraków position between the maritime Western Europe and the con- tinental Eastern European lowland. Field trip leads through the core of the central part of the Tatry Mts: Bystra valley, Kasprowy Wierch Mt, and Sucha Woda valley (Fig. 1). It gives good insight into geological Abstract: The trip gives insight into geology and landforms as well structure, landscape as well as weathering and soil forming as into past and present dynamic geological, geomorphologic and processes. Essential differences between the both main parts soil-forming processes in the central part of Polish Tatra Mts.
  • Wyniki 4 Lat Badań Drzewostanów Pohuraganowych Puszczy Piskiej

    Wyniki 4 Lat Badań Drzewostanów Pohuraganowych Puszczy Piskiej

    Wiad. entomol. 26 (3): 207-223 Poznań 2007 Reakcje biegaczowatych (Coleoptera: Carabidae) na skutki huraganu – wyniki 4 lat badań drzewostanów pohuraganowych Puszczy Piskiej Carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) response to the effects of a hurricane – a four-year study from post-hurricane stands in the Puszcza Piska Forest JAROSŁAW SKŁODOWSKI, PAULINA GARBALIŃSKA Katedra Ochrony Lasu i Ekologii SGGW, ul. Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warszawa; e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: In July 2002, 33000 ha of pine forest in north-eastern Poland were hit by a hurricane. Since spring 2003, a survey on carabid assemblages inhabiting the damaged stands has been carried out. The Carabidae fauna of affected stands in the Pisz Forest Dis- trict was compared with that of non-affected stands in the Maskulińskie Forest District. In both stand types 15 plots in 5 age classes were established (3 plots in each class): class I (20–40 years old), II (40–50), III (50–60), IV (60–80) and V (above 80 years old). The dis- turbance contributed to a profound decrease in carabid abundance, although carabid spe- cies richness was significantly higher in the damaged stands compared to the control ones. Both a cluster analysis and CCA analysis clearly distinguished between the post-hurricane and control assemblages. The hurricane considerably reduced the proportion of forest Eu- ropean autumn breeding and hygrophilous species individuals in carabid assemblages. Moreover, a marked decline in MIB (Mean Individual Biomass) and SPC (Sum of Progres- sive Characteristics) index in the disturbed stands was observed. An inverse trend was no- ticed for hemizoophages, open-habitat and xerophilous species individuals, which increased in abundance significantly in stand openings.
  • Małopolski Zarząd Melioracji I Urządzeń Wodnych W Krakowie O Jednostce

    Małopolski Zarząd Melioracji I Urządzeń Wodnych W Krakowie O Jednostce

    Województwo Małopolskie Małopolski Zarząd Melioracji i Urządzeń Wodnych w Krakowie O jednostce Małopolski Zarząd Melioracji i Urządzeń Wodnych jest wojewódzką samorządową jednostką organizacyjną. MZMiUW jest jednostką budżetową samorządu województwa, finansowaną z budżetu województwa. Nadzór i kontrolę nad działalnością MZMiUW sprawuje Zarząd Województwa Małopolskiego. Misja jednostki Ochrona przeciwpowodziowa województwa małopolskiego Ewidencja urządzeń W administracji Małopolskiego Zarządu Melioracji i Urządzeń Wodnych w Krakowie znajduje się: 3 680 km cieków naturalnych w tym uregulowanych 1 503 km Ewidencja urządzeń W administracji Małopolskiego Zarządu Melioracji i Urządzeń Wodnych w Krakowie znajduje się: wałów przeciwpowodziowych 1 016,3 km wraz z urządzeniami towarzyszącymi 2 miejsce w Polsce pod względem ilości urządzeń w skali całego kraju 8 467 km Ewidencja urządzeń W administracji Małopolskiego Zarządu Melioracji i Urządzeń Wodnych w Krakowie znajduje się: 20 przepompowni melioracyjnych Ogółem w Polsce - 579 obiektów Ewidencja urządzeń W administracji Małopolskiego Zarządu Melioracji i Urządzeń Wodnych w Krakowie znajduje się: 895 szt. śluz wałowych 1 zbiornik wodny „Zesławice” Zadania jednostki MZMiUW realizuje, w imieniu Marszałka Województwa Małopolskiego, zadania wynikające z wykonywania przez Marszałka Województwa praw właścicielskich w stosunku do wód publicznych stanowiących własność Skarbu Państwa, istotnych dla regulacji stosunków wodnych na potrzeby rolnictwa oraz w stosunku do pozostałych wód nie podlegających zarządzaniu przez Prezesa Krajowego Zarządu Gospodarki Wodnej lub Dyrektorów Parków Narodowych. POWÓDŹ 2010 Informacja dot. sytuacji powodziowej w Województwie Małopolskim w 2010r. W miesiącach maju i czerwcu bieżącego roku Województwo Małopolskie nawiedziły wyjątkowo intensywne opady deszczu, które spowodowały katastrofalne przepływy wód w korytach rzek i potoków. Wielkość opadów wyniosła odpowiednio około 200 litrów na metr kwadratowy w miesiącu maju i około 130 litrów w czerwcu.
  • Coleoptera: Carabidae) – a Case Study from Białowieża (Poland)

    Coleoptera: Carabidae) – a Case Study from Białowieża (Poland)

    Eur. J. Entomol. 111(5): 639–648, 2014 doi: 10.14411/eje.2014.088 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) Consequence of the transformation of a primeval forest into a managed forest for carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) – a case study from Białowieża (Poland) Jarosław SKŁODOWSKI Department of Forest Protection and Ecology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warszawa, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Coleoptera, Carabidae, species number, ecological traits, forest specialist species, long-winged, short-winged species, carabids, Białowieża primeval forest Abstract. A comparison was made of the number of species, species diversity and ecological traits of carabid beetle (Coleoptera: Cara- bidae) assemblages inhabiting Białowieża Primeval Forest (National Park) and adjacent managed Białowieża forest planted following clear-cutting of the primeval forest 80 years ago. Five pitfall traps were set in each plot in the primeval and managed forests in areas that differed in terms of humidity and soil fertility. The first hypothesis tested was that the type of stand (primeval vs. managed) has a greater effect on species diversity and life history traits of carabid assemblages than soil fertility or humidity. The second hypothesis tested was that a similar hierarchy of these factors affects the occurrence of particular species. It was demonstrated that the number of species in the primeval and managed forest sites did not differ significantly, but that mesic stands within these forests were more species-rich than boggy stands. However, the Shannon index for carabids was higher for the primeval stands. More species of carabids were recorded in the boggy primeval forest than boggy managed forest.