Maunakea Plant Threats, Identification, Collection & Processing Guide

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Maunakea Plant Threats, Identification, Collection & Processing Guide Office of Maunakea Management Invasive Species Plan Standard Operating Procedure D Maunakea Plant Threats, Identification, Collection & Processing Guide Version 1.0, 8/17/2015, Jessica Kirkpatrick, Fritz Klasner, Kerri Nakatsu, & Darcy Yogi Table of Contents 1. Purpose and Scope .................................................................................................................................... 1 2. University Management Area and Ecological Zones................................................................................. 2 3. Native Plant Species .................................................................................................................................. 4 4. Priority Plant Threats ................................................................................................................................ 5 5. Field Staff – Plant Identification Guide ..................................................................................................... 9 5.1. Vegetation Terminology ..................................................................................................................... 9 5.2. Native Species within the Management Area.................................................................................. 11 5.3. Introduced Species within Management Area ................................................................................ 23 5.4. A Selection of Introduced Plants on Adjacent lands ........................................................................ 35 5.5. Plant Identification Overview of Established Species ...................................................................... 38 6. Vegetation Collection, Processing & Identification ................................................................................ 39 6.1. Priority Plant Threats ....................................................................................................................... 39 Established within UH Management Area .......................................................................................... 39 Established on Adjacent lands or on Island ........................................................................................ 39 6.2. Native Vegetation Species ............................................................................................................... 39 Identification Known ........................................................................................................................... 39 Identification Unknown ...................................................................................................................... 39 7. Revision History Log ................................................................................................................................ 40 8. Recommended Citation .......................................................................................................................... 40 9. Outreach Use – Plant Identification Guide ............................................................................................. 41 9.1. Native Plant Species ......................................................................................................................... 41 9.2. Introduced Plant Species .................................................................................................................. 41 9.3. Native Plant Identification ............................................................................................................... 42 9.4. Introduced Plant Identification ........................................................................................................ 46 9.5. Outreach Plant Identification Overview .......................................................................................... 52 1. Purpose and Scope This standard operating procedure (SOP) is designed to assist with plant identification, invasive plant threat prioritization, and the collection and processing of vegetation on Maunakea for both field staff and with public outreach activities. The identification guide portion of this SOP is not intended to be comprehensive, rather it is representative of common species to facilitate identification. This SOP should be used under the guidance of a professional botanist if complete confidence in specimen identification is required. SOP D, v1.0 8/17/15 Plant Threats, Identification, Collection, & Processing Guide Page 1 of 53 Office of Maunakea Management Invasive Species Plan 2. University Management Area and Ecological Zones The Office of Maunakea Management (OMKM) manages the Mauna Kea Science Reserve (MKSR) including the Astronomy Precinct, Road Corridor, and Halepōhaku (HP) facilities. There are three community types within the UH Management Area; the Alpine Shrubland (from 2,900m/ 9,500ft to 3,400m/11,150ft), Alpine Grassland (3,400m/11,150ft to 3,900m/ 12,800ft), and the Alpine Stone Desert (3,900m/ 12,800ft to the summit). SOP D, v1.0 8/17/15 Plant Threats, Identification, Collection, & Processing Guide Page 2 of 53 Office of Maunakea Management Invasive Species Plan Figure 1. UH Management Areas and Community Types. SOP D, v1.0 8/17/15 Plant Threats, Identification, Collection, & Processing Guide Page 3 of 53 Office of Maunakea Management Invasive Species Plan 3. Native Plant Species Native species established within the management area are identified below. Species are grouped by management area and sorted by family, genus, and species1. Common name2 and morphology are also displayed. Table 1. Native Species in the Road Corridor & at Halepōhaku (below the MKSR). Family Species Common Name Morphology Aspleniaceae Asplenium adiantum-nigrum ‘Iwa‘Iwa, Spleenwort fern Fern Aspleniaceae Asplenium trichomanes ‘Oāli'i, ‘Owāli‘i Fern Asteraceae Dubautia arborea Na‘ena‘e, Maunakea dubautia Shrub Asteraceae Dubautia ciliolata glutinosa Na‘ena‘e, Lava dubautia Shrub Asteraceae Pseudognaphalium sandwicensium ‘Ena‘ena Herb Asteraceae Tetramolopium humile humile Alpine tetramolopium Shrub Caryophyllaceae Silene struthioloides Alpine catchfly Shrub Chenopodiaceae Chenopodium oahuense ‘Āweoweo, ‘Āheahea Shrub Cyperaceae Carex macloviana St. Malo’s sedge Sedge Cyperaceae Carex wahuensis O‘ahu sedge Sedge Dennstaedtiaceae Pteridium aquilinum Kīlau, Bracken fern Fern Dryopteridaceae Dryopteris wallichiana Alpine woodfern Fern Ericaceae Leptecophylla tameiameiae Pūkiawe Shrub Ericaceae Vaccinium reticulatum ‘Ōhelo, ‘Ōhelo ‘ai Shrub Fabaceae Sophora chrysophylla Māmane Tree Geraniaceae Geranium cuneatum hololeucum Nohoanu, Hinahina Shrub Juncaceae Luzula hawaiiensis Hawai‘i wood rush Rush Lamiaceae Stenogyne microphylla Little-leaf stenogyne Vine Lamiaceae Stenogyne rugosa Mā‘ohi‘ohi Vine Oxalidaceae Oxalis corniculata Yellow wood sorell Herb Papaveraceae Argemone glauca Pua Kala, Hawaiian poppy Herb Poaceae Agrostis sandwicensis Hawai‘i bentgrass Grass Poaceae Deschampsia nubigena Alpine hairgrass Grass Poaceae Lachnagrostis filiformis He‘upueo, Pacific bentgrass Grass Poaceae Trisetum glomeratum Pili Uka, Mountain pili Grass Polygonaceae Rumex giganteus Pāwale Shrub Pteridaceae Pellaea ternifolia Kalamoho Fern Rosaceae Osteomeles anthyllidifolia ‘Ūlei Shrub Rubiaceae Coprosma ernodeoides Kūkaenēnē Shrub Rubiaceae Coprosma montana Pilo Tree Sapindaceae Dodonaea viscosa ‘A‘ali‘i Tree Table 2. Native Species in the MKSR & Astronomy Precinct. Family Species Common Name Morphology Aspleniaceae Asplenium adiantum-nigrum ‘Iwa‘Iwa, Spleenwort fern Fern Aspleniaceae Asplenium trichomanes ‘Oāli'i, ‘Owāli‘i Fern Asteraceae Argyroxiphium sandwicense sandwicense ‘Āhinahina Shrub Asteraceae Dubautia ciliolata glutinosa Na‘ena‘e, Lava dubautia Shrub Asteraceae Pseudognaphalium sandwicensium ‘Ena‘Ena Herb 1 The scientific names used are valid and accepted (as of 2/2015) in the Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS) database. Names are subject to change with updated ITIS information. 2 Common names include Hawaiian and English names when known. Hawaiian name spellings confirmed in Nā Puke Wehewehe ‘Ōlelo Hawai‘i. SOP D, v1.0 8/17/15 Plant Threats, Identification, Collection, & Processing Guide Page 4 of 53 Office of Maunakea Management Invasive Species Plan Asteraceae Tetramolopium humile humile Alpine tetramolopium Shrub Carophyllaceae Silene struthioloides Alpine Catchfly Shrub Dennstaedtiaceae Pteridium aquilinum Kīlau, Bracken fern Fern Dryopteridaceae Cystopteris douglasii Douglas' Bladderfern Fern Dryopteridaceae Dryopteris wallichiana Alpine woodfern Fern Ericaceae Leptecophylla tameiameiae Pūkiawe Shrub Ericaceae Vaccinium reticulatum ‘Ōhelo, ‘Ōhelo ‘ai Shrub Juncaceae Luzula hawaiiensis Hawai‘i wood rush Rush Poaceae Agrostis sandwicensis Hawai‘i bentgrass Grass Poaceae Lachnagrostis filiformis He‘upueo, Pacific bentgrass Grass Poaceae Trisetum glomeratum Pili Uka, Mountain pili Grass Pteridaceae Pellaea ternifolia Kalamoho Fern 4. Priority Plant Threats Plant threats are identified using the Hawai`i Pacific Weed Risk Assessment (HPWRA) score. If no score is available for a species, OMKM has requested an assessment from the HPWRA program and in the meantime will continue to monitor the distribution of the species. The Maunakea Invasive Species Management Plan identifies a Weed Risk Assessment threshold score of 8 or higher for evaluation and potential action, and a score of 17 or higher designated as “high” priority species. Monitoring and control procedures will be developed for all introduced plant species currently established
Recommended publications
  • Tejon Ranch Botanical Survey Report
    David Magney Environmental Consulting FLORA OF THE TEJON RANCH CONSERVANCY ACQUISITION AREAS, TEJON RANCH, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: TEJON RANCH CONSERVANCY July 2010 DMEC Mission Statement: To provide quality environmental consulting services, with integrity, that protect and enhance the human and natural environment. David Magney Environmental Consulting Flora of the Tejon Ranch Conservancy Acquisition Areas, Tejon Ranch, California Prepared for: Tejon Ranch Conservancy P.O. Box 216 Frazier Park, California 93225 Contact: Michael White Phone: 661/-248-2400 ext 2 Prepared by: David Magney Environmental Consulting P.O. Box 1346 Ojai, California 93024-1346 Phone: 805/646-6045 23 July 2010 DMEC Mission Statement: To provide quality environmental consulting services, with integrity, that protect and enhance the human and natural environment. This document should be cited as: David Magney Environmental Consulting. 2010. Flora of the Tejon Ranch Conservancy Acquisition Areas, Tejon Ranch, California. 23 July2010. (PN 09-0001.) Ojai, California. Prepared for Tejon Ranch Conservancy, Frazier Park, California. Tejon Ranch Conservancy – Flora of Tejon Ranch Acquisition Areas Project No. 09-0001 DMEC July 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................. 1 SECTION 2. METHODS ........................................................................................ 3 Field Survey Methods ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Exobasidium Darwinii, a New Hawaiian Species Infecting Endemic Vaccinium Reticulatum in Haleakala National Park
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Springer - Publisher Connector Mycol Progress (2012) 11:361–371 DOI 10.1007/s11557-011-0751-4 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Exobasidium darwinii, a new Hawaiian species infecting endemic Vaccinium reticulatum in Haleakala National Park Marcin Piątek & Matthias Lutz & Patti Welton Received: 4 November 2010 /Revised: 26 February 2011 /Accepted: 2 March 2011 /Published online: 8 April 2011 # The Author(s) 2011. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Hawaii is one of the most isolated archipelagos Exobasidium darwinii is proposed for this novel taxon. This in the world, situated about 4,000 km from the nearest species is characterized among others by the production of continent, and never connected with continental land peculiar witches’ brooms with bright red leaves on the masses. Two Hawaiian endemic blueberries, Vaccinium infected branches of Vaccinium reticulatum. Relevant char- calycinum and V. reticulatum, are infected by Exobasidium acters of Exobasidium darwinii are described and illustrated, species previously recognized as Exobasidium vaccinii. additionally phylogenetic relationships of the new species are However, because of the high host-specificity of Exobasidium, discussed. it seems unlikely that the species infecting Vaccinium calycinum and V. reticulatum belongs to Exobasidium Keywords Exobasidiomycetes . ITS . LSU . vaccinii, which in the current circumscription is restricted to Molecular phylogeny. Ustilaginomycotina
    [Show full text]
  • Pu'u Wa'awa'a Biological Assessment
    PU‘U WA‘AWA‘A BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT PU‘U WA‘AWA‘A, NORTH KONA, HAWAII Prepared by: Jon G. Giffin Forestry & Wildlife Manager August 2003 STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF FORESTRY AND WILDLIFE TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE ................................................................................................................................. i TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................. ii GENERAL SETTING...................................................................................................................1 Introduction..........................................................................................................................1 Land Use Practices...............................................................................................................1 Geology..................................................................................................................................3 Lava Flows............................................................................................................................5 Lava Tubes ...........................................................................................................................5 Cinder Cones ........................................................................................................................7 Soils .......................................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Sinningia Speciosa Sinningia Speciosa (Buell "Gloxinia") Hybrid (1952 Cover Image from the GLOXINIAN)
    GESNERIADS The Journal for Gesneriad Growers Vol. 61, No. 3 Third Quarter 2011 Sinningia speciosa Sinningia speciosa (Buell "Gloxinia") hybrid (1952 cover image from THE GLOXINIAN) ADVERTISERS DIRECTORY Arcadia Glasshouse ................................49 Lyndon Lyon Greenhouses, Inc.............34 Belisle's Violet House ............................45 Mrs Strep Streps.....................................45 Dave's Violets.........................................45 Out of Africa..........................................45 Green Thumb Press ................................39 Pat's Pets ................................................45 Kartuz Greenhouses ...............................52 Violet Barn.............................................33 Lauray of Salisbury ................................34 6GESNERIADS 61(3) Once Upon a Gloxinia … Suzie Larouche, Historian <[email protected]> Sixty years ago, a boy fell in love with a Gloxinia. He loved it so much that he started a group, complete with a small journal, that he called the American Gloxinia Society. The Society lived on, thrived, acquired more members, studied the Gloxinia and its relatives, gesneriads. After a while, the name of the society changed to the American Gloxinia and Gesneriad Society. The journal, THE GLOXINIAN, grew thicker and glossier. More study and research were conducted on the family, more members and chapters came in, and the name was changed again – this time to The Gesneriad Society. Nowadays, a boy who falls in love with the same plant would have to call it Sinningia speciosa. To be honest, the American Sinningia Speciosa Society does not have the same ring. So in order to talk "Gloxinia," the boy would have to talk about Gloxinia perennis, still a gesneriad, but a totally different plant. Unless, of course, he went for the common name of the spec- tacular Sinningia and decided to found The American Florist Gloxinia Society.
    [Show full text]
  • In Vitro Fermentation Characteristics and Methane Mitigation Responded to Flavonoid Extract Levels from Alternanthera Sissoo and Dietary Ratios
    fermentation Article In Vitro Fermentation Characteristics and Methane Mitigation Responded to Flavonoid Extract Levels from Alternanthera sissoo and Dietary Ratios Sukruthai Sommai 1, Anusorn Cherdthong 1,* , Chanon Suntara 1, Sarong So 1, Metha Wanapat 1 and Sineenart Polyorach 2 1 Tropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand; [email protected] (S.S.); [email protected] (C.S.); [email protected] (S.S.); [email protected] (M.W.) 2 Department of Animal Production Technology and Fisheries, Faculty of Agricultural Technology, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology, Bangkok 10520, Thailand; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +66-43-202-362; Fax: +66-43-202-362 Abstract: Two experiments were conducted under this study: Experiment 1 was to study production yield, chemical composition, and in vitro degradability of Brazilian spinach (Alternanthera sissoo; BS) leaf and leaf + leaf-stalk at various maturity ages of 15, 30, 45, and 60 days after plantation and regrowth and Experiment 2 was to evaluate the effect of flavonoid extract from BS leaf and leaf + leaf-stalk and dietary ratios on ruminal gas production, fermentation characteristics, and in vitro degradability. Experiment 1 showed that maturity ages after planting and regrowth increased, Citation: Sommai, S.; the yield significantly increased. Increasing maturity ages significantly (p < 0.05) increased neutral Cherdthong, A.; Suntara, C.; So, S.; detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber content and decreased crude protein content, total flavonoid Wanapat, M.; Polyorach, S. In Vitro (TF) content, and degradability for both leaf and leaf + leaf-stalk.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollination Ecology and Evolution of Epacrids
    Pollination Ecology and Evolution of Epacrids by Karen A. Johnson BSc (Hons) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Tasmania February 2012 ii Declaration of originality This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma by the University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of my knowledge and belief no material previously published or written by another person except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis, nor does the thesis contain any material that infringes copyright. Karen A. Johnson Statement of authority of access This thesis may be made available for copying. Copying of any part of this thesis is prohibited for two years from the date this statement was signed; after that time limited copying is permitted in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Karen A. Johnson iii iv Abstract Relationships between plants and their pollinators are thought to have played a major role in the morphological diversification of angiosperms. The epacrids (subfamily Styphelioideae) comprise more than 550 species of woody plants ranging from small prostrate shrubs to temperate rainforest emergents. Their range extends from SE Asia through Oceania to Tierra del Fuego with their highest diversity in Australia. The overall aim of the thesis is to determine the relationships between epacrid floral features and potential pollinators, and assess the evolutionary status of any pollination syndromes. The main hypotheses were that flower characteristics relate to pollinators in predictable ways; and that there is convergent evolution in the development of pollination syndromes.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Verbascum virgatum Stokes: an addition to the flora of Indiana, with comparison to Verbascum blattaria L. David P. Vernon and Jean D. Schoknecht Department of Life Sciences Indiana State University, Terre Haute, Indiana 47809 Introduction Experience in many countries has shown that one can easily find numerous rare plants along railroad tracks. Large unused lots in railyards and adjacent to rail lines are often luxuriously overgrown with vegetation that is quite rich in species (9). One such lot in downtown Terre Haute at the corner of First and Spruce streets is the site of collection of the first specimens of Verbascum virgatum Stokes found in Indiana. Verbascum L. is a European genus, five species of which have become established in the northeast United States and four others of which have been reported (3). The species are biennials, producing a rosette the first year and a tall flowering stem the next (4). Verbascum virgatum is distributed along roadsides from Cape Breton to southern Ontario, south to South Carolina, Ohio and Texas and in western states, as an adventive, according to Gray's Manual of Botany (2). The Ohio record is a single specimen collected in Franklin County in 1891 (7). It is considered a rare adventive in Illinois, where it was collected in Coles and Pulaski counties (8). These three specimens are housed in the herbarium of the Illinois Natural History Survey (ILLS). It is infrequent in the coastal plain of South Carolina and in Moore and Montgomery counties in North Carolina (11). It is reported as adventive along roadsides in Arizona and Utah (12).
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 9-17-2018 Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Redwood National Park" (2018). Botanical Studies. 85. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/85 This Flora of Northwest California-Checklists of Local Sites is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A CHECKLIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS OF THE REDWOOD NATIONAL & STATE PARKS James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State Univerity Arcata, California 14 September 2018 The Redwood National and State Parks are located in Del Norte and Humboldt counties in coastal northwestern California. The national park was F E R N S established in 1968. In 1994, a cooperative agreement with the California Department of Parks and Recreation added Del Norte Coast, Prairie Creek, Athyriaceae – Lady Fern Family and Jedediah Smith Redwoods state parks to form a single administrative Athyrium filix-femina var. cyclosporum • northwestern lady fern unit. Together they comprise about 133,000 acres (540 km2), including 37 miles of coast line. Almost half of the remaining old growth redwood forests Blechnaceae – Deer Fern Family are protected in these four parks.
    [Show full text]
  • A Landscape-Based Assessment of Climate Change Vulnerability for All Native Hawaiian Plants
    Technical Report HCSU-044 A LANDscape-bASED ASSESSMENT OF CLIMatE CHANGE VULNEraBILITY FOR ALL NatIVE HAWAIIAN PLANts Lucas Fortini1,2, Jonathan Price3, James Jacobi2, Adam Vorsino4, Jeff Burgett1,4, Kevin Brinck5, Fred Amidon4, Steve Miller4, Sam `Ohukani`ohi`a Gon III6, Gregory Koob7, and Eben Paxton2 1 Pacific Islands Climate Change Cooperative, Honolulu, HI 96813 2 U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, Hawaii National Park, HI 96718 3 Department of Geography & Environmental Studies, University of Hawai‘i at Hilo, Hilo, HI 96720 4 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service —Ecological Services, Division of Climate Change and Strategic Habitat Management, Honolulu, HI 96850 5 Hawai‘i Cooperative Studies Unit, Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, Hawai‘i National Park, HI 96718 6 The Nature Conservancy, Hawai‘i Chapter, Honolulu, HI 96817 7 USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Hawaii/Pacific Islands Area State Office, Honolulu, HI 96850 Hawai‘i Cooperative Studies Unit University of Hawai‘i at Hilo 200 W. Kawili St. Hilo, HI 96720 (808) 933-0706 November 2013 This product was prepared under Cooperative Agreement CAG09AC00070 for the Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center of the U.S. Geological Survey. Technical Report HCSU-044 A LANDSCAPE-BASED ASSESSMENT OF CLIMATE CHANGE VULNERABILITY FOR ALL NATIVE HAWAIIAN PLANTS LUCAS FORTINI1,2, JONATHAN PRICE3, JAMES JACOBI2, ADAM VORSINO4, JEFF BURGETT1,4, KEVIN BRINCK5, FRED AMIDON4, STEVE MILLER4, SAM ʽOHUKANIʽOHIʽA GON III 6, GREGORY KOOB7, AND EBEN PAXTON2 1 Pacific Islands Climate Change Cooperative, Honolulu, HI 96813 2 U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, Hawaiʽi National Park, HI 96718 3 Department of Geography & Environmental Studies, University of Hawaiʽi at Hilo, Hilo, HI 96720 4 U.
    [Show full text]
  • Invasive Aphids Attack Native Hawaiian Plants
    Biol Invasions DOI 10.1007/s10530-006-9045-1 INVASION NOTE Invasive aphids attack native Hawaiian plants Russell H. Messing Æ Michelle N. Tremblay Æ Edward B. Mondor Æ Robert G. Foottit Æ Keith S. Pike Received: 17 July 2006 / Accepted: 25 July 2006 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006 Abstract Invasive species have had devastating plants. To date, aphids have been observed impacts on the fauna and flora of the Hawaiian feeding and reproducing on 64 native Hawaiian Islands. While the negative effects of some inva- plants (16 indigenous species and 48 endemic sive species are obvious, other species are less species) in 32 families. As the majority of these visible, though no less important. Aphids (Ho- plants are endangered, invasive aphids may have moptera: Aphididae) are not native to Hawai’i profound impacts on the island flora. To help but have thoroughly invaded the Island chain, protect unique island ecosystems, we propose that largely as a result of anthropogenic influences. As border vigilance be enhanced to prevent the aphids cause both direct plant feeding damage incursion of new aphids, and that biological con- and transmit numerous pathogenic viruses, it is trol efforts be renewed to mitigate the impact of important to document aphid distributions and existing species. ranges throughout the archipelago. On the basis of an extensive survey of aphid diversity on the Keywords Aphid Æ Aphididae Æ Hawai’i Æ five largest Hawaiian Islands (Hawai’i, Kaua’i, Indigenous plants Æ Invasive species Æ Endemic O’ahu, Maui, and Moloka’i), we provide the first plants Æ Hawaiian Islands Æ Virus evidence that invasive aphids feed not just on agricultural crops, but also on native Hawaiian Introduction R.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance Document Pohakuloa Training Area Plant Guide
    GUIDANCE DOCUMENT Recovery of Native Plant Communities and Ecological Processes Following Removal of Non-native, Invasive Ungulates from Pacific Island Forests Pohakuloa Training Area Plant Guide SERDP Project RC-2433 JULY 2018 Creighton Litton Rebecca Cole University of Hawaii at Manoa Distribution Statement A Page Intentionally Left Blank This report was prepared under contract to the Department of Defense Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP). The publication of this report does not indicate endorsement by the Department of Defense, nor should the contents be construed as reflecting the official policy or position of the Department of Defense. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the Department of Defense. Page Intentionally Left Blank 47 Page Intentionally Left Blank 1. Ferns & Fern Allies Order: Polypodiales Family: Aspleniaceae (Spleenworts) Asplenium peruvianum var. insulare – fragile fern (Endangered) Delicate ENDEMIC plants usually growing in cracks or caves; largest pinnae usually <6mm long, tips blunt, uniform in shape, shallowly lobed, 2-5 lobes on acroscopic side. Fewer than 5 sori per pinna. Fronds with distal stipes, proximal rachises ocassionally proliferous . d b a Asplenium trichomanes subsp. densum – ‘oāli’i; maidenhair spleenwort Plants small, commonly growing in full sunlight. Rhizomes short, erect, retaining many dark brown, shiny old stipe bases.. Stipes wiry, dark brown – black, up to 10cm, shiny, glabrous, adaxial surface flat, with 2 greenish ridges on either side. Pinnae 15-45 pairs, almost sessile, alternate, ovate to round, basal pinnae smaller and more widely spaced.
    [Show full text]
  • Breeding Biology of the Brown Noddy on Tern Island, Hawaii
    Wilson Bull., 108(2), 1996, pp. 317-334 BREEDING BIOLOGY OF THE BROWN NODDY ON TERN ISLAND, HAWAII JENNIFER L. MEGYESI’ AND CURTICE R. GRIFFINS ABSTRACT.-we observed Brown Noddy (Anous stolidus pileatus) breeding phenology and population trends on Tern Island, French Frigate Shoals, Hawaii, from 1982 to 1992. Peaks of laying ranged from the first week in January to the first week in November; however, most laying occurred between March and September each year. Incubation length was 34.8 days (N = 19, SD = 0.6, range = 29-37 days). There were no differences in breeding pairs between the measurements of the first egg laid and successive eggs laid within a season. The proportion of light- and dark-colored chicks was 26% and 74%, respectively (N = 221) and differed from other Brown Noddy colonies studied in Atlantic and Pacific oceans. The length of time between clutches depended on whether the previous outcome was a failed clutch or a successfully fledged chick. Hatching, fledging, and reproductive success were significantly different between years. The subspecies (A. s. pihtus) differs in many aspects of its breeding biology from other colonies in the Atlantic and Pacific oceans, in regard to year-round occurrence at the colony, frequent renesting attempts, large egg size, proportion of light and dark colored chicks, and low reproductive success caused by in- clement weather and predation by Great Frigatebirds (Fregata minor). Received 31 Mar., 1995, accepted 5 Dec. 1995. The Brown Noddy (Anous stolidus) is the largest and most widely distributed of the tropical and subtropical tern species (Cramp 1985).
    [Show full text]