DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report 2015 Key Persons in CEHA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Report 2015 Key Persons in CEHA Center for Healthy Aging Annual Report 2015 Key persons in CEHA Professor Assoc. Professor Professor Professor Professor Professor Lene Juel Rasmussen Astrid Jespersen Karsten Vrangbæk Erik Lykke Mortensen Rudi Westendorp Martin Lauritzen Managing Director, Theme I Theme I Theme II Theme II Theme II Theme III Professor Assoc. Professor Professor Professor Professor Head of Ian D. Hickson Hocine Mankouri Michael Kjær Vilhelm Bohr Thomas Söderqvist Administration Theme III Theme III Theme III Theme III Communication and Tina Gottlieb outreach Center for Healthy Aging is supported by the Danish foundation Nordea-fonden 4 New interrelationships 7 Research, communication and outreach 7 Theme I: Community innovation for healthy aging 13 Theme II: Life course aging processes: Lifespan exposures and healthy aging 21 Theme III: Energy balance in humans: What are the mechanisms underlying reduced energy? 27 Intervention studies and cross-theme projects 35 Communication and outreach platform 39 International recruitment 45 Staff list 51 Internationalization and networking 53 IARU – International research cooperation 54 iHAN – International Healthy Aging Network 55 The IARU Project: Walkability – mobility and social relations among the elderly 55 IARU – CEHA summer course 56 Other international networking 59 Selected educational activities 61 Selected PhD dissertations 62 PhD courses 62 Post graduate level 62 Master level 62 Pre graduate level 63 Other dissemination activities 65 Major grant and prize in 2015 66 Major grant 66 Prize 69 Internal communication and selected joint activities 70 Selected joint activities 75 Selected communication and outreach activities 77 Research outcomes – working with stakeholders 81 Communicating to the wider public 82 Innovative outreach concepts for the general public 86 CEHA’s event wheel – an overview 89 Management 91 CEHA Steering Committee 92 International Scientific Advisory Board 92 Internal Advisory Committee 92 CEHA Administration Annual Report 2015 · 3 New interrelationships Never before have human beings lived as long as they do The Center for Healthy Aging (CEHA) at the University now. But, the quality of a life is not only measured in its of Copenhagen is positioned at the heart of the national length. True quality of life means maintaining high vital- and international agenda for aging research. CEHA ity and a feeling of energy at all life stages: this is what has chosen to focus on cause/effect relationships that we now mean when we say the “Good Life.” This is the influence human health at the individual and population raison d’etre for aging research: it informs us about de- levels. terminants of our life span (how we can live longer) and about how to make living longer worthwhile. Themed, interdisciplinary research Aging research also plays an important role at the CEHA research falls into three themes, from the cellular societal level. This is especially important as popula- level to the societal level, and is seeking solutions to criti- tion aging occurs, as the average age of the population cal unsolved problems in aging research. These include: increases and working age individuals are called on to support for an increasing number of elderly individu- 1. Health-promoting innovations, in which we inves- als. In short, population aging has very large impact tigate the significance of the local community and on socio-economics. In the face of population aging, options for promoting the health and energy of the workforce productivity is likely to decline while the elderly in the last part of their lives. We also focus burden on the healthcare sector and health care costs on how historical and social change influences both increase dramatically. The overall health of the popula- interpersonal and intergenerational relationships. tion could decline, because elderly individuals suffer 2. Aging processes throughout the life course, are a field from age-related disease and disability to an extent not in which we investigate the factors that affect aging found in younger individuals. For example, age-related throughout life, people’s motivation for maintaining diseases include cancer as well as neurodegenerative active lifestyles and what happens to muscles and the and cardiovascular diseases. This has major implications brain as we age. for society worldwide, even though population aging 3. Human energy levels are a theme in which we focus varies significantly according to country and geographic on the body’s inability to repair cellular damage and region. Nevertheless, there is increasing interest in aging thus repair damage to cells and hence tissues and research worldwide. organs as we age. 4 · Annual Report 2015 Professor Lene Juel Rasmussen, Managing Director CEHA has been attracting many excellent researchers amongst whom we wish to create appetite for more from across the world, many of whom want to be part knowledge about aging. We want the public to know of our special interdisciplinary working environment. The about our research and then to want to learn more, interdisciplinarity of CEHA is one of its unique and very ultimately helping everyone live longer lives with a higher special characteristics, which will be fostered even more quality of life. One example is the exhibition on “Round in the future by the new and spectacular Maersk Building and about the brains of children and grandparents” in the Panum complex. The Maersk Building is expected which we ran in conjunction with Medical Museion. This to be completed in 2016, and will serve as a dynamic exhibit gave young and elderly alike an opportunity to physical, social and intellectual resource, that will bring investigate and learn about the aging brain. CEHA personnel together and push our interdisciplinary CEHA researchers feel that it is important to actively research to a new level. Working under the same roof, disseminate the results of our research to the non-scien- we expect to be inspired and be open to new collabora- tific community. Whilst we investigate, the public has the tions and ideas. Here is to a great 2016 for CEHA! opportunity to put our results into practice. Therefore, the views and experience of members of the public are An international leader in aging research extremely important to us. This is why we make a large In recent years, CEHA has assumed a leading position in effort to engage the public, as well as healthcare profes- the international aging research community. CEHA par- sionals and political decision-makers in a dialogue about ticipates in many unique collaborations, including: IARU their needs, their experience and how we can interface (an international collaboration between some of the top with all stakeholders in human health. universities worldwide), MARRIAGE (an EU-funded col- In 2015, we feel that we lived up to many of our laboration with eight European aging research institutes), goals, and that many Danes are aware today that CEHA and ABRAHAM (a transatlantic research collaboration is an important source of knowledge about healthy ag- between Europe, USA and Canada). CEHA is part of the ing in Denmark. international elite in aging research and we are constant- ly seeking new international collaborations. CEHA is communicating in new ways about our research to the world, reaching out to the general public Professor Lene Juel Rasmussen, Managing Director Annual Report 2015 · 5 6 · Annual Report 2015 Theme I Community innovation for healthy aging Theme I Community innovation for healthy aging Group leaders psycho-social, organizational and technological dynamics Astrid Jespersen, Assoc. Professor and social energies during daily life within these com- Karsten Vrangbæk, Professor munities. The goal is to achieve an understanding of the Maria Kristiansen, Assoc. Professor reality of healthy aging and to understand how healthy Bjarke Oxlund, Assoc. Professor aging is promoted among aging citizens. Susan Whyte, Professor We organized three seminars (two in 2015) with practitioners and managers from the partner municipali- Theme I is focused on community participation and ties focusing on jointly-selected topics, such as inequality, local practices as the foundation for healthy aging. We loneliness and interaction with civil society organizations. examine how local settings and practices, as well as socio-economic position affects processes and practices Background and hypothesis related to aging. Theme I researchers work in many The research in Theme I is guided by four questions: disciplines, from ethnology and anthropology to public What processes contribute to changing cultural ideas health, and work closely together on a range of research about health and energy over the life course within topics. In other words, Theme I aims to understand how socially contrasting communities? In what ways does his- the heterogeneity of local communities influences the torical change affect social relations between and within promotion of health and energy of aging citizens. generations in a specific society? How do different The research in Theme I is based on the close collabo- actors/players with diverse initiatives for healthy aging rations between CEHA and four Danish municipalities: interact within a municipality? With regard to healthy Ishøj, Copenhagen, Vordingborg and Gentofte. These aging, how can relations between local stakeholders be municipalities represent different organizational and reconfigured at the community level to promote energy institutional conditions and populations that
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 9 Lønloft Læs Side 13 Cinstuderende Beretter Om Sin Første Dissektion Læs Side 20
    Fupsikkert eksamensbevis KU-lønstigninger under lup Mit første snit Det bliver nu langt sværere at kopiere KU´s eksamensbeviser der Videnskabsministeriet undersøger nu om de store lønstigninger til »Jeg opdagede først sent at jeg pludselig sad og fjernede hud fra fra 1. september får helt ens layout og en ny kompetenceprofil institutledere på Københavns Universitet er i strid med ministeriets skulderen, meget sirligt, ved brug af skalpel og pincet.« En medi- Læs side 8-9 lønloft Læs side 13 cinstuderende beretter om sin første dissektion Læs side 20 Universitetsavisen NUMMER 9 · 31. AUGUST 2007 · WWW.KU.DK/UNIVERSITETSAVISEN Velkommen til det kvindelige universitet Andelen af kvindelige studerende på Københavns Universitet stiger fra år til år. På nogle studier er der over 90 procent kvinder. Spørgs- målet er om det har nogen betyd- ning for studierne Læs side 5-8 2 UNIVERSITETSAVISEN 9 · 2007 Nyheder Dokumentation Bestyrelse afviser klage Bestyrelsens brev Brev til Københavns Universitets bestyrelse af 2. maj 2007 fra KUA-forskere Bestyrelsen har modtaget jeres brev af 2. maj 2007 med bilag. Rek- tor har orienteret bestyrelsen om, at han har godkendt Det Huma- nistiske Fakultets forslag til opfyldelse af Udviklingskontraktens mål 1. 144 bekymrede forskere på KUA fik intet Endvidere har bestyrelsen afholdt et temamøde om emnet forsk- ningsdokumentation, herunder med orientering om ’den norske ud af deres klage til bestyrelsen over ud- model’. Forskningsvurdering spiller en central rolle i Videnskabsmi- nisteriets arbejde med kriterier for fordeling af midler til universi- formningen af nyt system til måling af teterne og vil derfor på sigt få betydning for universiteternes øko- nomi.
    [Show full text]
  • Campus Og Studiemiljø Fysiske Rammer Til Morgendagens Universiteter
    CAMPUS CAMPUS Flere og flere universiteter Universiteterne bliver udfordret! Læringsformer og faggrænser ændrer sig. Der er nye krav til bæredyg- har fået øjnene op for “ tighed og fleksible bygningsstrukturer. Ligesom vi i dag oplever et anderledes samspil mellem uddan- OG potentialet i at bruge fysisk AND planlægning strategisk: Det nelse, forskning og omverden. Tilsammen gør det, at universiteterne til stadighed skal nytænke sig selv. STUDIEMIL er ikke en tilfældighed, at MIT STUD De fysiske rammer spiller en væsentlig rolle for CAMPUS OG vælger planlægningsmetoder, morgendagens universiteter. Bogen præsenterer Y der sikrer ikonarkitektur, eksempler på, hvordan internationale og danske uni- ENVI JØ Harvard integrerer versiteter arbejder med sagen og debatterer samtidig RO måden, vi gør det på. - fysiske rammer til morgendagens universiteter bæredygtighed i alle led af NMENT planlægningen, og ETH Zürich Bogen er essensen af et projekt i Universitets- og Bygningsstyrelsen under Ministeriet for Videnskab, vælger at omdanne et 70´er - STUDIEMILJØ Teknologi og Udvikling, som sætter fokus på potentia- campus til en akademisk lerne ved at indtænke fysisk planlægning af univer- physical framework for universities of the future bydel for TankeKultur / More siteter professionelt og strategisk. Den er skrevet til fysiske rammer beslutningstagere, udførende og brugere, der arbej- and more universities have der med fysisk universitetsplanlægning. realised the potential of til morgendagens universiteter Bogen skal inspirere og skabe forudsætninger for den applying physical planning fysiske planlægning af morgendagens campusområ- strategically: It is no der og studiemiljø. coincidence that MIT chooses planning methods that The universities are being challenged! Learning forms and subject boundaries are changing. New demands ensure iconic architecture, for sustainability and flexible building structures have that Harvard integrates emerged.
    [Show full text]
  • Universitetsparken Rigshospitalet Panum De
    20 minutes to Lyngby-Taarbæk City of Knowledge, FACTS and the Technical University of Denmark • 350 innovative knowledge based companies • 20,000 researchers and highly educated employees • 20,000 students • 160,000 m office space Lyngbyvej ej Jagtv UNIVERSITETSPARKEN Research and innovation in fields such as pharmacology, Aldersrogade nano-science, quantum computing, chemistry, physics and biology. Entrepreneurs and businesses are represented in SCIENCE Innovation Hub, the GTS é l al Institute Bioneer: FARMA and Copenhagen Bio Science V k e ar 10 minutes to r m P u Park which houses biotech and life science companies. Frederiksberg Science City, n ø Copenhagen Business School dsgad s r and University of Copenhagen e Le (Frederiksberg Campus) 111 e d sga ld 10 a 5 Har 9 Universitets Ø ste j r Al e parken lé Jagtv é l l A e r 3 r ø 4 N 13 2 6 HARALDSGADE DISTRICT 1 Home to the Metropolitan University College, several commercial tenancies and to the T agens start-up and accelerator environment of v ej DARE2mansion and SingularityU Denmark. An ideal location for innovative businesses due 14 to the proximity to the innovation ecosystem, the university, university hospital and university college. j Sjællandsgade e v s m T a a d gens g le 8 B ve j RIGSHOSPITALET DE GAMLES BY Denmark’s most specialized university hospital and a beacon in the healthcare sector. Sund Vaekst Huset is home to a cross-sectorial 7 Educates health professionals, develops new partnership of Copenhagen Health Innovation, the treatment methods, and collaborates with research group CopenRehab, the City of industry on testing solutions and products for Copenhagen’s Center for Welfare Technology and ade pharma, healthtech and healthcare.
    [Show full text]
  • University Life 2007
    University2 0 0 7 Life The University of Copenhagen’s Programme of Excellence In November 2007, the University of Copenhagen awarded approximately DKK 350 million to 20 outstanding research projects. The Programme of Excellence is a new initiative that allows researchers to apply for funding for ongoing or new research. Each project can apply for a maximum of DKK 5 million a year for five consecutive years. The first 20 recipients of Programme of Excellence grants are: • Professor Ulrik Gether: Biomolecular scaffolding of neutrontransmitter receptors and transporters (BioScaRT) • Professor Michael Sørensen: Statistical methods for complex and high dimensional models UNIVERSITY LIFE 2007 • Professor Carsten Rahbek: Center for Macroecology and (ANNUAL REPORT) Evolution - How to explain distribution of life on Earth © UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN, APRIL 2008 • Professor Thomas Bjørnholm: Single molecule nanoscience • Director Kristian Helin: Epigenetics and cancer Publisher Photographers University of Copenhagen Credits by photos • Professor Jacob Weiner: Evolutionary agroecology Communications Division • Associate Professor Jette Sandholm Kastrup: Ionotropic Nørregade 10, Printing and repro PO Box 2177 P.E. offset A/S, Varde, DK glutamate receptors as targets for structure-based drug research DK-1017 Copenhagen • Associate Professor Kim Ryholt: Canon and identity formation in the Denmark Typography Adobe Garamond and Frutiger earliest literate societies Editors Anne Mette Engelbrecht (Editor) Paper • Professor Carsten Elbro: Development
    [Show full text]
  • The Fourth and Final Report (2014-´18)
    UNIVERSITY OF COPENH AGEN Final Report UCPH LOM 2017-2018 Last annual report and executive summary December 2018 UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN’S STRATEGIC PLATFORM FOR LIFESTYLE, OBESITY AND META- BOLIC RESEARCH (UCPH LOM) Annual report 2017-2018 and executive summary Executive Board Professor Bente Stallknecht, Head of LOM Professor Thue W. Schwartz Professor Arne Astrup Associate Professor Astrid Pernille Jespersen Professor Erik Richter Associate Professor Johanne Stubbe Teglbjærg Kristensen Professor Karsten Vrangbæk Professor Mette Hartlev Editing UCPH LOM research support office Panum Building Blegdamsvej 3b 2200 Copenhagen N Contact: Professor Bente Stallknecht, Head of UCPH LOM 2015-2018 2 Table of contents PREFACE ............................................................................................................................ 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: THE UCPH LOM INITIATIVE – FOUR YEARS OF SUPPORTING INTERNAL COLLABORATION AND SHARED IDENTITY ........................ 6 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 10 TOPIC 1: STRENGTHENING THE SCIENTIFIC ENVIRONMENTS, COLLABORATIONS, AND SHARED IDENTITY .................................................................................................. 10 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Activities and results for 2017-2018 .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fysiske Rammer Til Morgendagens Universiteter
    CAMPUS CAMPUS Flere og flere universiteter Universiteterne bliver udfordret! Læringsformer og faggrænser ændrer sig. Der er nye krav til bæredyg- har fået øjnene op for “ tighed og fleksible bygningsstrukturer. Ligesom vi i dag oplever et anderledes samspil mellem uddan- OG potentialet i at bruge fysisk AND planlægning strategisk: Det nelse, forskning og omverden. Tilsammen gør det, at universiteterne til stadighed skal nytænke sig selv. STUDIEMIL er ikke en tilfældighed, at MIT STUD De fysiske rammer spiller en væsentlig rolle for CAMPUS OG vælger planlægningsmetoder, morgendagens universiteter. Bogen præsenterer Y der sikrer ikonarkitektur, eksempler på, hvordan internationale og danske uni- ENVI JØ Harvard integrerer versiteter arbejder med sagen og debatterer samtidig RO måden, vi gør det på. - fysiske rammer til morgendagens universiteter bæredygtighed i alle led af NMENT planlægningen, og ETH Zürich Bogen er essensen af et projekt i Universitets- og Bygningsstyrelsen under Ministeriet for Videnskab, vælger at omdanne et 70´er - STUDIEMILJØ Teknologi og Udvikling, som sætter fokus på potentia- campus til en akademisk lerne ved at indtænke fysisk planlægning af univer- physical framework for universities of the future bydel for TankeKultur / More siteter professionelt og strategisk. Den er skrevet til fysiske rammer beslutningstagere, udførende og brugere, der arbej- and more universities have der med fysisk universitetsplanlægning. realised the potential of til morgendagens universiteter Bogen skal inspirere og skabe forudsætninger for den applying physical planning fysiske planlægning af morgendagens campusområ- strategically: It is no der og studiemiljø. coincidence that MIT chooses planning methods that The universities are being challenged! Learning forms and subject boundaries are changing. New demands ensure iconic architecture, for sustainability and flexible building structures have that Harvard integrates emerged.
    [Show full text]
  • Campusudvikling Metode Og Proces
    CAMPUSUDVIKLING Metode og proces CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT Method and Process CAMPUSUDVIKLING Metode og proces CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT Method and Process Indhold Introduktion og læsevejledning 7 3. RUM TIL LÆRING: Caseeksempler 4. METODE og PROCES: Erfaringer fra 5. ØJEBLIKSBILLEDE: 8 danske på strategisk fysisk planlægning 98 arbejdet med strategisk planlægning 148 universiteters campusområder 188 GLASGOW – Læringscenter 100 Mennesker før mursten 150 Aalborg Universitet, Aalborg Campus 190 1. ANALYSE: Hvad er campusudvikling? 12 Glasgow Caledonian University, Af Søren Houen Schmidt, projektchef, Aarhus Universitet, Aarhus Campus 196 The Saltire Learning Centre Byplanlaboratoriet Trekroner + Campus og ejer af CBS, Frederiksberg Campus 204 Vidensby 14 REKOMMANDERET DTU, DTU Campus Lyngby 210 International og regional 19 LONDON – Superlaboratorium til situeret læring 105 IT-Universitetet, Søndre Campus 216 Kommunalt samarbejde 23 London Metropolitan University, Science Centre System eller samtale 155 Københavns Universitet, Søndre Campus 222 Bo og leve 25 Af Mikala Holme Samsøe, bygherrerådgiver, Roskilde Universitet, Trekroner Campus 232 Erhverv 29 BRIGHTON – Rum til kreative processer 108 Henning Larsen Syddansk Universitet, Odense Campus 238 Rum til læring 32 University of Brighton, Creative Zone Bæredygtighed 38 Et mødested 162 STOCKHOLM – Mellemrum som mødesteder 112 Interview: Bernard Aebischer, planlægnings- og Karolinska Instituttet og Stockholms Länsting, byggechef, Novartis Campuses Medical Case Centre 2. CAMPUS: Caseeksempler på Foranderlige
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2010 Table of Contents
    Annual Report 2010 Table of contents Review, Management’s Statement and Auditor’s Report 3 Company information 3 Management’s Statement 4 Independent Auditor’s Report 5 Managerial and organisational performance 8 Knowledge dissemination and innovation 12 Financial review 14 Expected financial developments 15 Target reporting 17 Reporting on the University’s development contract 2008–2010 21 Financial statements 24 Accounting policies 24 Income statement 28 Balance sheet 29 Statement of changes in equity 31 Cash flow statement 32 Notes to financial statements 33 Financial highlights for the University of Copenhagen 42 University of Copenhagen Annual Report 2010 2 Table of contents Review, Management’s Statement and Auditor’s Report Company information Company Auditors University of Copenhagen National Audit Office Nørregade 10 Landgreven 4 DK-1165 Copenhagen K DK-1022 Copenhagen K Local authority: City of Copenhagen CVR no.: 29 97 98 12 Institutional auditors PricewaterhouseCoopers Board Strandvejen 44 Nils Strandberg Pedersen, formand DK-2900 Hellerup Claus Bræstrup Boel Flodgren Attorneys Peter Gæmelke Kammeradvokaten Hanne Foss Hansen (Legal Adviser to the Danish Government) Louise Lipczak Hansen Vester Farimagsgade 23 Jannik Johansen DK-1606 Copenhagen V Ingrid Kryhlmand Niels Kærgård Bank Jørn Lund Danske Bank Laura Toftegaard Pedersen Holmens Kanal 2 DK-1090 Copenhagen K Rector Ralf Hemmingsen Prorector Thomas Bjørnholm University Director Jørgen Honoré University of Copenhagen Annual Report 2010 Report and endorsement 3 Management’s Statement The Board and Executive Management have today considered and approved the Annual Report of the University of Copenhagen for 2010. The Annual Report has been prepared in accordance with Ministerial Order no. 1373 of 10 December 2007 on funding and accounts, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2015 Table of Contents
    Annual Report 2015 Table of Contents Review, Management’s Statement and Auditor’s Report 3 Company Information 3 Management’s Statement 4 Independent Auditor’s Report 5 Management Report 2015 7 Target Reporting 25 Reporting on UCPH’s Development Contract 2015–17 25 Financial Statements 29 Accounting Policies 29 Income Statement 33 Balance Sheet 34 Statement of Changes in Equity 36 Cash Flow Statement 37 Notes to Financial Statements 38 Financial Highlights for the University of Copenhagen 48 University of Copenhagen Annual Report 2015 2 Indhold Review, Management’s Statement and Auditor’s Report Company Information Company Auditors University of Copenhagen Danish National Audit Office Nørregade 10 Landgreven 4 DK-1165 Copenhagen K DK-1301 Copenhagen K Local authority: City of Copenhagen CVR no.: 29 97 98 12 Institutional Auditors Deloitte State Authorised Board Public Accountants Nils Strandberg Pedersen, chairperson Weidekampsgade 6 Mads Krogsgaard Thomsen DK-2300 Copenhagen S, Anja C. Andersen Denmark Jannik Johansen Signe Møller Johansen Attorneys Kari Melby Kammeradvokaten (Legal Adviser to the Danish Søren Axel Petersen Government) Sine Sunesen Vester Farimagsgade 23 Jakob Thomasen DK-1606 Copenhagen V Alexander Schwartz Thorvaldsen Eske Willerslev Bank Danske Bank Rector Holmens Kanal 2 Ralf Hemmingsen DK-1090 Copenhagen K Prorector for Research and Innovation Thomas Bjørnholm Prorector for Education Lykke Friis University Director Jesper Olesen University of Copenhagen Annual Report 2015 Report and endorsement 3 Management’s Statement The Board and Executive Management have today considered and approved the Annual Report of the University of Copenhagen for 2015. The Annual Report has been prepared in accordance with Ministerial Order no.
    [Show full text]
  • Universitetsavisen UAFHÆNGIG AF LEDELSEN PÅ KØBENHAVNS UNIVERSITET
    BAGGRUND1. sektion NYHEDER, BAGGRUND OG REPORTAGE NUMMER 15 · 10. DECEMBER 2009 · www.uniavisen.dk 15 Truer troende teologi? 8 Dommens dag for unilov 18 Professor gadedreng Teologistuderende frygter at KU skal optage stude- Helge Sander er tilfreds med den længe ventede eva- Filosofiprofessor Vincent F. Hendricks får både forsk- rende fra private bibelskoler, som man har gjort i luering af Universitetsloven. Men der er noget, der ik- ningspriser og patroner i posten for sin indsats i det Århus. Ledelsen ser tiden an ke harmonerer. For også Sanders kritikere jubler gammelgermanske, fascistoide ekspertvælde Universitetsavisen UAFHÆNGIG AF LEDELSEN PÅ KØBENHAVNS UNIVERSITET Opråb til topforskere: Hyr jeres fyrede kolleger Mens 130 medarbejdere står til at miste jobbet, henter andre KU-forskere enorme beløb hjem fra forskningsråd og fonde. Del med os andre, opfordrer dekaner og tillidsfolk LÆS SIDE 4-7 TEGNING: RASMUS MEISLER/SPILD AF TID LEDER Af Richard Bisgaard, ansvarshavende redaktør En forbløffende kritisk evaluering DANSKE UNIVERSITETER LIDER under for meget detail- MAN GNIDER SIG I ØJNENE og spørger, hvilken rapport det indsættes en generel bestemmelse, som præciserer den indivi- styring, for lidt medbestemmelse til medarbejdere og stude- mon er, ministeren har læst. Det kan ikke være den samme som duelle universitetsbestyrelses forpligtelse til at sikre en til- rende og uklare signaler om forskningsfrihed. Sådan lyder i den, kritikere som lektor Sune Auken og professor Peter Haarder fredsstillende praksis for medbestemmelse og en høj grad af kort form de vigtigste konklusioner i den evalueringsrapport fra Københavns Universitet omtaler inde i avisen. De betegner gennemsigtighed ved udpegning af universitetsledere og eks- om universitetsloven fra 2003, som et internationalt panel tværtimod evalueringen som ’forbløffende kritisk’ og er positivt terne medlemmer af bestyrelserne.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2014 Key Persons in CEHA
    Center for Healthy Aging Annual Report 2014 Key persons in CEHA Professor Assoc. Professor Professor Professor Professor Professor Lene Juel Rasmussen Astrid Jespersen Allan Krasnik Erik Lykke Mortensen Martin Lauritzen Ian D. Hickson Managing Director, Theme I Theme I Theme II Theme II Theme III Theme III Assoc. Professor Professor Professor Professor Head of Hocine Mankouri Michael Kjær Vilhelm Bohr Thomas Söderqvist Administration Theme III Theme III Theme III Communication Tina Gottlieb and outreach Center for Healthy Aging is supported by the Danish foundation Nordea-fonden 4 Involving research paves the way for healthy aging 7 Research, communication and outreach 7 Theme I: Community innovation for healthy aging 13 Theme II: Life course aging processes: Lifespan exposures and healthy aging 21 Theme III: Energy balance in humans: What are the mechanisms underlying reduced energy? 27 Selected intervention studies and cross-theme projects 2014 33 Communication and outreach platform 37 International recruitment in 2014 41 In memory of Associate Professor Lene Otto 45 Staff list 51 Internationalization and networking 53 IARU – International research cooperation 53 IARU – International congresses on Aging in Copenhagen 54 IARU – Graduate Student Conference 55 IARU – CEHA Summer School 55 iHAN – International Healthy Aging Network 57 Other international networking and events 59 Selected educational activities 61 PhD dissertations 62 PhD courses 62 Post graduate level 62 Master level 63 Pre graduate level 63 Other dissemination activities
    [Show full text]
  • Universitetsavisen 10.03
    københavns universitet Universitetsavisen 10 19 06 03 KU på fast kurs Konsistorium har nedsat en særlig komite til at finde de bedste bestyrelseskandidater. Nationalbankdirektør Bodil Nyboe Andersen har allerede sagt ja tak, og andre står parat i kulissen LÆS SIDE 3 FOTO: SCANPIX Løst ansatte på glatis Forskeres ytringsfrihed i fare Coaching i akademia Universitetets mange deltidslærere skal ifølge en ny Forskere der blander sig i den offentlig debat igen- Begrebet ‘coaching’ stammer fra sportens verden, lov have mere sikkerhed i ansættelsen, men de ender nem artikler, kronikker eller læserbreve, skal kunne men en både teoretisk og praktisk udvikling af be- måske med det stik modsatte: Mere usikkerhed indstævnes for Udvalgene Vedrørende Videnskabelig grebet gennem de seneste år gør det til et brugbart LÆS SIDE 5 Uredelighed, foreslår en arbejdsgruppe. »Himmel- ledelsesinstrument og et pædagogisk redskab – råbende vanvid«, mener juraprofessor på KU også for et universitet i forandring LÆS SIDE 6 LÆS VIDENSKABET SIDE 10-11 2 Universitetsavisen 10 . 2003 God sommer Universitetsavisen går med dette nummer på sommerferie. Vi er på gaden igen med første nummer efter sommerferien ved stu- diestart den 29. august som bliver et dobbeltnummer. KU NOTER ▼ Prisopgavevindere KUMMENTAR Af rektor Linda Nielsen og prorektor Jørgen Olsen fra Jura PRESSENS MAGT – To studerende fra Jura har vundet Justitsministeriets Pris- opgave 2002 med emnet ‘Pressen og Retspolitikken’. Justitsministeren over- rakte prisen på 25.000 kr. til Pia Mar- Forandringens tid kussen og Nanna Borum Gjedde ved en reception i Justitsministeriet den 3. juni. edtællingen er for længst begyndt. Den 1. juli rektoratet ser vi på mange måder frem til den pro- træder den nye universitetslov i kraft, og mon Ices der ligger foran os.
    [Show full text]