DOCSLIB.ORG

Reforestation with Native Species in the Pachijal and Mira River Watersheds for Carbon Retention

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reforestation with Native Species in the Pachijal and Mira River Watersheds for Carbon Retention PROJECT DESCRIPTION: VCS Version 3 REFORESTATION WITH NATIVE SPECIES IN THE PACHIJAL AND MIRA RIVER WATERSHEDS FOR CARBON RETENTION With technical support from Brian Krohnke, Mindo Cloudforest Foundation Project Title Reforestation with Native Species in the Pachijal and Mira River Watersheds for Carbon Retention Version 3 Date of Issue 10-August-2011 this version of the document issued Prepared By Mindo Cloudforest Foundation, CarbonNeg Initiative, Groenhart Contact Brian Krohnke, Camino Milpe-Pachijal y km 91 Vía Calacalí – La Independencia, Pichincha, Ecuador; [email protected]; www.mindocloudforest.org; +(5939)355-1949 v3.0 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: VCS Version 3 Table of Contents 1 Project Details ......................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Summary Description of the Project ............................................................................... 6 1.2 Sectoral Scope and Project Type .................................................................................. 10 1.3 Project Proponent .......................................................................................................... 10 1.4 Other Entities Involved in the Project ........................................................................... 10 1.5 Project Start Date .......................................................................................................... 11 1.6 Project Crediting Period ................................................................................................ 11 1.7 Project Scale and Estimated GHG Emission Reductions or Removals ........................ 11 1.8 Description of the Project Activity ............................................................................... 12 1.9 Project Location ............................................................................................................ 14 1.10 Conditions Prior to Project Initiation ............................................................................ 18 1.11 Compliance with Laws, Statutes and Other Regulatory Frameworks .......................... 22 1.12 Ownership and Other Programs .................................................................................... 22 1.12.1 Proof of Title ......................................................................................................... 22 1.12.2 Emissions Trading Programs and Other Binding Limits ...................................... 22 1.12.3 Participation under Other GHG Programs ............................................................ 22 1.12.4 Other Forms of Environmental Credit .................................................................. 22 1.12.5 Projects Rejected by Other GHG Programs.......................................................... 22 1.13 Additional Information Relevant to the Project ............................................................ 23 1.13.1 Eligibility Criteria ................................................................................................. 23 1.13.2 Leakage Management ........................................................................................... 24 1.13.3 Commercially Sensitive Information .................................................................... 24 1.13.4 Further Information ............................................................................................... 24 2 Application of Methodology ................................................................................................. 25 2.1 Title and Reference of Methodology ............................................................................ 25 2.2 Applicability of Methodology....................................................................................... 25 2.3 Project Boundary .......................................................................................................... 25 2.4 Baseline Scenario .......................................................................................................... 37 2.5 Additionality ................................................................................................................. 43 2.6 Methodology Deviations ............................................................................................... 45 3 Quantification of GHG Emission Reductions and Removals ............................................... 46 3.1 Baseline Emissions ....................................................................................................... 46 3.2 Project Emissions .......................................................................................................... 48 3.3 Leakage ......................................................................................................................... 48 3.4 Summary of GHG Emission Reductions and Removals .............................................. 50 4 Monitoring ............................................................................................................................ 53 4.1 Data and Parameters Available at Validation ............................................................... 54 4.2 Data and Parameters Monitored .................................................................................... 56 4.3 Description of the Monitoring Plan .............................................................................. 60 4.3.1 Purpose of the monitoring plan ................................................................................. 60 4.3.2 The monitoring plan in general ................................................................................. 60 4.3.3 Data management...................................................................................................... 61 v3.0 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: VCS Version 3 General instructions on data collection ................................................................................ 61 Data storage.......................................................................................................................... 62 Information management system .......................................................................................... 62 Monitoring periods and frequency ........................................................................................ 62 Good practices ...................................................................................................................... 62 4.3.4 Stratification and sampling design ............................................................................ 62 4.3.5 Monitoring of project implementation: forest establishment and forest mgmt ........ 63 Monitoring project boundary ................................................................................................ 64 Monitoring forest establishment ........................................................................................... 64 Monitoring of forest management ......................................................................................... 65 4.3.6 Monitoring of GHG emissions and removals ........................................................... 65 Baseline net GHG removals by sinks ........................................................................................ 65 Leakage ..................................................................................................................................... 65 Actual net GHG removals by sinks/carbon pools: .................................................................... 66 4.3.7 Monitoring community aspects................................................................................. 69 4.3.8 Monitoring biodiversity ............................................................................................ 70 4.4 Organizational structure ................................................................................................ 71 4.4.1 Schematic presentation ............................................................................................. 71 4.4.2 Actors involved: their responsibilities and competencies ......................................... 71 4.5 Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) ........................................................ 74 4.5.1 Field data collection .................................................................................................. 74 4.5.2 Data entry .................................................................................................................. 74 4.5.3 Data maintenance and archiving ............................................................................... 75 4.5.4 Uncertainty assessment ............................................................................................. 75 4.6 Procedures for handling internal auditing and non-conformities ................................. 75 5 Environmental Impact ........................................................................................................... 75 6 Stakeholder Comments ......................................................................................................... 76 Annex 1 CCB Standards Compliance Key ................................................................................... 77 Original Conditions in the Project Area................................................................................ 77 Baseline Projection ..............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Colombia Mega II 1St – 30Th November 2016 (30 Days) Trip Report
    Colombia Mega II 1st – 30th November 2016 (30 Days) Trip Report Black Manakin by Trevor Ellery Trip Report compiled by tour leader: Trevor Ellery Trip Report – RBL Colombia - Mega II 2016 2 ___________________________________________________________________________________ Top ten birds of the trip as voted for by the Participants: 1. Ocellated Tapaculo 6. Blue-and-yellow Macaw 2. Rainbow-bearded Thornbill 7. Red-ruffed Fruitcrow 3. Multicolored Tanager 8. Sungrebe 4. Fiery Topaz 9. Buffy Helmetcrest 5. Sword-billed Hummingbird 10. White-capped Dipper Tour Summary This was one again a fantastic trip across the length and breadth of the world’s birdiest nation. Highlights were many and included everything from the flashy Fiery Topazes and Guianan Cock-of- the-Rocks of the Mitu lowlands to the spectacular Rainbow-bearded Thornbills and Buffy Helmetcrests of the windswept highlands. In between, we visited just about every type of habitat that it is possible to bird in Colombia and shared many special moments: the diminutive Lanceolated Monklet that perched above us as we sheltered from the rain at the Piha Reserve, the showy Ochre-breasted Antpitta we stumbled across at an antswarm at Las Tangaras Reserve, the Ocellated Tapaculo (voted bird of the trip) that paraded in front of us at Rio Blanco, and the male Vermilion Cardinal, in all his crimson glory, that we enjoyed in the Guajira desert on the final morning of the trip. If you like seeing lots of birds, lots of specialities, lots of endemics and enjoy birding in some of the most stunning scenery on earth, then this trip is pretty unbeatable.
    [Show full text]
  • Chlorospingus Flavovirens Rediscovered, with Notes on Other Pacific Colombian and Cauca Valley Birds
    CHLOROSPINGUS FLAVOVIRENS REDISCOVERED, WITH NOTES ON OTHER PACIFIC COLOMBIAN AND CAUCA VALLEY BIRDS STEVEN L. HILTY ABSTRACT.--Aspecimen of the Yellow-green Bush Tanager collectedin 1972 was the first Colombianand third known specimensince the previoustwo taken in Ecuadorin 1935,and the specieshas not been reported since. Presentsnotes and new recordsof 36 other speciesfrom this region of high endemismon the westernslopes of the westernAndes.--Department of Ecologyand Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson,Arizona 85721. Accepted2 June 1975. THE Pacific slope of Colombia records the highest annual rainfall in the Western Hemisphere (Rumney 1968), yet the distribution of many birds in this unique region of high endemism is still known chiefly through early collections(e.g. Cassin 1860; Bangs 1908, 1910; Chapman 1917) and the extensive collectionsof Von Sheidern (fide Meyer de Schauensee)during 1938, 1940, 1941, 1945, and 1946. This and other information has been compiledby Meyer de Schauensee(1948-52, 1964, 1966, 1970). Recent papers by Haffer (1967a, 1967b), Miller (1966), Olivares (1957a, 1957b, 1958), and Ralph and Chaplin (1973) contributeto our knowledgeof Pacific Colom- bian avifauna but the status of many speciesis still poorly known. The data reported here were obtained during portions of 1972, 1973 and 1975, chiefly in the AnchicayJ Valley at low to moderate elevationson the west slopeof the westernAndes and in the upper Cauca Valley near Cali, Department of Valle. Llano Bajo, Aguaclara, Saboletas,Danubio, and La Cascada, mentioned in text, are small villagesalong the Old BuenaventuraRoad, southof Buenaventura. Yatacu• is a site administered by the Corporaci6n Aut6noma del Valle del Cauca (C.V.C.) in the upper Anchicay/t Valley above the confluenceof the Rio Digua and Rio An- chicay/t.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guides Tour Report Colombia: Cali Escape 2019
    Field Guides Tour Report Colombia: Cali Escape 2019 Nov 2, 2019 to Nov 10, 2019 Jesse Fagan & Daniel Uribe For our tour description, itinerary, past triplists, dates, fees, and more, please VISIT OUR TOUR PAGE. Our birding group at the summit of Montezuma in the Tatama National Park. There is permanent military outpost here to protect the communications towers. The soldiers are always happy to see birding groups. This is the site for Chestnut-bellied Flowerpiercer and Munchique Wood-Wren. We started the tour in one of the two major economic and political centers of the region, Santiago de Cali (or just "Cali"), in the southern part of the Cauca Valley. Medellin, the other large metropolitan city, is a few hours north where the valley begins to narrow considerably. The Cauca Valley is pinned to the west by the Western Cordillera and to the east by the Central Cordillera, both splinter ranges of the Andes Mountains. This valley is known for its large sugercane production, and as a result, its famous rum. We made our first stop on the east slope of the Eastern Cordillera at El 18 and Finca Alejandria. This was a nice way to 'ease' ourselves into the diverse and intense birding we would be experiencing over the next few days. The feeders (both hummingbird and fruit) at Finca Alejandria teemed with exotic tanagers (including Multicolored), honeycreepers, toucanets (Crimson-rumped and Southern Emerald), and colorful and fancy hummingbirds. We made our first lunch attempt at bandeja paisa (for some) before descending into the valley and our first night in Buga.
    [Show full text]
  • RIO SILANCHE BIRD SANCTUARY BIRD CHECKLIST Updated April 2008 the Number Codes Give a General Idea of Your Chance to See a Bird on a Short Visit
    RIO SILANCHE BIRD SANCTUARY BIRD CHECKLIST Updated April 2008 The number codes give a general idea of your chance to see a bird on a short visit. Code 1's are common or conspicuous species that you have a good chance to see on any given day. 2 means an uncommon species, or a shy bird that can be difficult to see even if it might be common. Code 3 birds are either rare, very difficult to see, or both. Species marked with an asterisk(*) have only been recorded along the entrance road from the main highway, and not on reserve property. Taxonomy follows Ridgely & Greenfield The Birds of Ecuador , 2001, with some recent updates. Please email any new records (with details) to [email protected]. English name Latin name Notes Tinamous Tinamidae 1 3 Little Tinamou Crypturellus soui Herons, Bitterns, and Egrets Ardeidae 2 2 Great Egret Ardea alba 3 2 Snowy Egret Egretta thula 4 1 Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis 5 3 Striated Heron* Butorides striatus American Vultures Cathartidae 6 1 Black Vulture Coragyps atratus 7 1 Turkey Vulture Cathartes aura Kites, Eagles, and Hawks Accipitridae 8 3 Osprey Pandion haliaetus 9 2 Gray-headed Kite Leptodon cayanensis 10 1 Swallow-tailed Kite Elanoides forficatus 11 2 Double-toothed Kite Harpagus bidentatus 12 2 Plumbeous Kite Ictinia plumbea 13 3 Tiny Hawk Accipiter superciliosus 14 3 Bicolored Hawk Accipiter bicolor 15 2 Plumbeous Hawk Leucopternis plumbea 16 3 Semiplumbeous Hawk Leucopternis semiplumbea 17 3 Gray-backed Hawk Leucopternis occidentalis Tumbesian endemic, endangered 18 2 Gray Hawk Buteo nitida
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationships of the Starlings (Sturnidae: Sturnini) and the Mockingbirds (Sturnidae: Mimini)
    THE RELATIONSHIPS OF THE STARLINGS (STURNIDAE: STURNINI) AND THE MOCKINGBIRDS (STURNIDAE: MIMINI) CHARLESG. SIBLEYAND JON E. AHLQUIST Departmentof Biologyand PeabodyMuseum of Natural History,Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511 USA ABSTRACT.--OldWorld starlingshave been thought to be related to crowsand their allies, to weaverbirds, or to New World troupials. New World mockingbirdsand thrashershave usually been placed near the thrushesand/or wrens. DNA-DNA hybridization data indi- cated that starlingsand mockingbirdsare more closelyrelated to each other than either is to any other living taxon. Some avian systematistsdoubted this conclusion.Therefore, a more extensiveDNA hybridizationstudy was conducted,and a successfulsearch was made for other evidence of the relationshipbetween starlingsand mockingbirds.The resultssup- port our original conclusionthat the two groupsdiverged from a commonancestor in the late Oligoceneor early Miocene, about 23-28 million yearsago, and that their relationship may be expressedin our passerineclassification, based on DNA comparisons,by placing them as sistertribes in the Family Sturnidae,Superfamily Turdoidea, Parvorder Muscicapae, Suborder Passeres.Their next nearest relatives are the members of the Turdidae, including the typical thrushes,erithacine chats,and muscicapineflycatchers. Received 15 March 1983, acceptedI November1983. STARLINGS are confined to the Old World, dine thrushesinclude Turdus,Catharus, Hylocich- mockingbirdsand thrashersto the New World. la, Zootheraand Myadestes.d) Cinclusis
    [Show full text]
  • Birding in Southern Ecuador February 11 – 27, 2016 TRIP REPORT Folks
    Mass Audubon’s Natural History Travel and Joppa Flats Education Center Birding in Southern Ecuador February 11 – 27, 2016 TRIP REPORT Folks, Thank you for participating in our amazing adventure to the wilds of Southern Ecuador. The vistas were amazing, the lodges were varied and delightful, the roads were interesting— thank goodness for Jaime, and the birds were fabulous. With the help of our superb guide Jose Illanes, the group managed to amass a total of 539 species of birds (plus 3 additional subspecies). Everyone helped in finding birds. You all were a delight to travel with, of course, helpful to the leaders and to each other. This was a real team effort. You folks are great. I have included your top birds, memorable experiences, location summaries, and the triplist in this document. I hope it brings back pleasant memories. Hope to see you all soon. Dave David M. Larson, Ph.D. Science and Education Coordinator Mass Audubon’s Joppa Flats Education Center Newburyport, MA 01950 Top Birds: 1. Jocotoco Antpitta 2-3. Solitary Eagle and Orange-throated Tanager (tied) 4-7. Horned Screamer, Long-wattled Umbrellabird, Rainbow Starfrontlet, Torrent Duck (tied) 8-15. Striped Owl, Band-winged Nightjar, Little Sunangel, Lanceolated Monklet, Paradise Tanager, Fasciated Wren, Tawny Antpitta, Giant Conebill (tied) Honorable mention to a host of other birds, bird groups, and etc. Memorable Experiences: 1. Watching the diving display and hearing the vocalizations of Purple-collared Woodstars and all of the antics, colors, and sounds of hummers. 2. Learning and recognizing so many vocalizations. 3. Experiencing the richness of deep and varied colors and abundance of birds.
    [Show full text]
  • O Rn Ito Lo Gía C O Lo M Bian a Four Elevational Range Extensions Of
    Four elevational range extensions of birds of the Western Breve Nota Andes of Colombia and northwestern Ecuador Cuatro extensiones de las distribuciones elevacionales de aves de la Cordillera Occidental de Colombia y el noroccidente de Ecuador R. Scott Winton1,2 1Estación Biológica La Hesperia, Pichincha, Quito, Ecuador. 2Current address: Duke University Wetland Center, Nicholas School of the Environment, Durham, North Carolina, USA. [email protected] Abstract Ornitología Colombiana Ornitología Research suggests that bird elevational ranges may be shifting upslope because of deforestation, habitat fragmentation or climate change. I present observations of four bird species that were encountered at a private reserve in Ecuador more than 300 meters above their known maximum altitudes in Colombia and Ecuador, including two that were recorded at altitudes higher than globally recorded maximums. Key words: birds, Ecuador, Colombia, Western Andes, elevation, range Resumen Investigaciones sobre las distribuciones de aves indican que sus ámbitos elevacionales pueden estar moviéndose hacia par- tes más altas por deforestación, fragmentación de hábitats o cambio climático. Aquí, presento observaciones de cuatro es- pecies de aves que registré en una reserva privada en Ecuador a más de 300 metros por encima de sus elevaciones máxi- mas registradas para Colombia y Ecuador, incluyendo dos especies observadas a elevaciones mayores que las registradas globalmente para ellas. colombiana/ colombiana/ - Palabras clave: aves, Andes Occidentales, Ecuador,
    [Show full text]
  • A Rapid Biological Assessment of the Upper Palumeu River Watershed (Grensgebergte and Kasikasima) of Southeastern Suriname
    Rapid Assessment Program A Rapid Biological Assessment of the Upper Palumeu River Watershed (Grensgebergte and Kasikasima) of Southeastern Suriname Editors: Leeanne E. Alonso and Trond H. Larsen 67 CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL - SURINAME CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL GLOBAL WILDLIFE CONSERVATION ANTON DE KOM UNIVERSITY OF SURINAME THE SURINAME FOREST SERVICE (LBB) NATURE CONSERVATION DIVISION (NB) FOUNDATION FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION CONTROL (SBB) SURINAME CONSERVATION FOUNDATION THE HARBERS FAMILY FOUNDATION Rapid Assessment Program A Rapid Biological Assessment of the Upper Palumeu River Watershed RAP (Grensgebergte and Kasikasima) of Southeastern Suriname Bulletin of Biological Assessment 67 Editors: Leeanne E. Alonso and Trond H. Larsen CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL - SURINAME CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL GLOBAL WILDLIFE CONSERVATION ANTON DE KOM UNIVERSITY OF SURINAME THE SURINAME FOREST SERVICE (LBB) NATURE CONSERVATION DIVISION (NB) FOUNDATION FOR FOREST MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION CONTROL (SBB) SURINAME CONSERVATION FOUNDATION THE HARBERS FAMILY FOUNDATION The RAP Bulletin of Biological Assessment is published by: Conservation International 2011 Crystal Drive, Suite 500 Arlington, VA USA 22202 Tel : +1 703-341-2400 www.conservation.org Cover photos: The RAP team surveyed the Grensgebergte Mountains and Upper Palumeu Watershed, as well as the Middle Palumeu River and Kasikasima Mountains visible here. Freshwater resources originating here are vital for all of Suriname. (T. Larsen) Glass frogs (Hyalinobatrachium cf. taylori) lay their
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2007 AMERICAN BIRD CONSERVANCY from the Chairman and the President
    Annual Report 2007 AMERICAN BIRD CONSERVANCY From the Chairman and the President In the Catbird Seat Gray Catbird: Greg Lavaty member recently mentioned that he thought the threats to birds and what is being done to overcome American Bird Conservancy is “in the catbird them. Please have a look at BNN on ABC’s website, seat.” This saying, popularized by the writer, www.abcbirds.org—we guarantee you’ll enjoy it. AJames Thurber, is generally used to mean one is in a high, prominent, and advantageous position, and so we were Your support is fundamental to our success, and it has flattered by the compliment. In nature, though, it is more increased exponentially through your support of ABC’s often the mockingbird that sits high and visible for all to American Birds Campaign, a drive based on measurable see, while the catbird makes a big stir but remains hidden conservation outcomes. We are pleased to report, at deep in the bushes. Maybe this is even truer of ABC— the campaign’s halfway point, that we are well past our always effective but not always seen! expectations in protecting birds and their habitats! Thank you for being on our team! Recently the New York Times Magazine described ABC as “a smaller, feistier group.” We are proud of being small, But despite what we have already achieved with your nimble, and at the same time feisty in the defense of birds help, ABC is just getting started. This year promises to and their habitats, and that’s why we chose neither the be ABC’s best in expanding reserves for rare species.
    [Show full text]
  • Neotropical Birding 24 2 Neotropical Species ‘Uplisted’ to a Higher Category of Threat in the 2018 IUCN Red List Update
    >> FEATURE RED LIST 2018 The 2018 IUCN Red List in the Neotropics James Lowen, Hannah Wheatley, Claudia Hermes, Ian Burfield and David Wege Neotropical Birding 21 featured a summary of the key implications for the Neotropics of the 2016 IUCN Red List for birds. This article briefs readers on the main changes from the 2018 update. s part of its role as the IUCN Red List BirdLife’s Red List team updated the Authority for birds, BirdLife International information available for roughly 2,300 species A is responsible for assessing the global worldwide. Globally, this resulted in changes to conservation status of each of the world’s 11,000 the categorisation of 89 species; 58 species were or so bird species, allocating each to a category ‘uplisted’ to a higher category of threat, whilst ranging from Least Concern to Extinct. The latest roughly half that number – 31 species – were update was published in November 2018 (BirdLife ‘downlisted’. In the Neotropics, 13 species were International 2018). Although much more modest uplisted (Fig. 2) and slightly more – 18 – were in reach than the comprehensive update carried downlisted (Fig. 5). Now let’s take a closer look at out in 2016, whose Neotropical dimension was the individual changes, largely using information discussed in Symes et al. (2017), the 2018 revamp made available on BirdLife’s ‘Globally Threatened contains a suite of interesting changes for species Bird Forums’ (8 globally-threatened-bird- occurring in the Neotropical Bird Club region that forums.birdlife.org). Is the picture quite as rosy as are worth drawing to readers’ collective attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Implications of Illegal Bird Trade and Disease
    CONSERVATION IMPLICATIONS OF ILLEGAL BIRD TRADE AND DISEASE RISK IN PERU A Dissertation by ELIZABETH FRANCES DAUT Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Chair of Committee, Donald J. Brightsmith Co-Chair of Committee, Markus J. Peterson Committee Members, Renata Ivanek-Miojevic Christian Brannstrom Head of Department, Roger Smith III May 2015 Major Subject: Veterinary Microbiology Copyright 2015 Elizabeth Frances Daut ABSTRACT Trade in wild-caught animals as pets is a global conservation and animal-welfare concern. Illegal and poorly-regulated legal wildlife trade can threaten biodiversity, spread infectious diseases, and result in considerable animal suffering and mortality. I used illegal wildlife trade in Peru, specifically native bird trade, as a case study to explore important aspects and consequences of the trade for domestic markets. With data collected from a five-year market survey and governmental seizure records, I applied a statistical modeling approach to investigate the influence of Peru’s legal export quota system on the country’s illegal domestic bird trade. I used an infectious-disease mathematical modeling approach to analyze how illegal harvest influenced disease dynamics in a wild parrot population. Finally, I used qualitative research methods to investigate the role of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and their members’ philosophical perspectives toward wildlife in combating illegal trade. I found that Peru had a thriving illegal trade in native birds (mostly parrots) for domestic consumers; 150 species were recorded in markets and/or seizures with over 35,250 individuals offered for sale (2007–2011).
    [Show full text]