DOCSLIB.ORG

Did Abraham Flexner Spark the Founding of CMAJ?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Did Abraham Flexner Spark the Founding of CMAJ? flexnor-duffin_Layout 1 04/04/11 8:40 AM Page 811 CMAJ Analysis Did Abraham Flexner spark the founding of CMAJ? Jacalyn Duffin MD PhD he Canadian Medical Association (CMA) mies everywhere; his “aggressive, articulate, and Competing interests: formed in 1867, but its journal did not outspoken” judgments guaranteed their visibility.7 None declared. T appear until 44 years later. Why 1911? The results of Flexner’s three short visits to This article has been peer Scholars have already documented the essen- the eight Canadian schools, in March, May and reviewed. tial factors: a longstanding willingness of the October of 1909, occupied seven pages near the Correspondence to: CMA to found a national journal, the availability end of his report, which was released in April Dr. Jacalyn Duffin, of a talented editor in Andrew Macphail and the 1910.2 If not perfect, Toronto and McGill were [email protected] voluntary termination of two regional periodi- “excellent” and committed to improvement. CMAJ 2011. DOI:10.1503 cals.1 Here I argue that the Canadian Medical Manitoba was good, with “beautifully kept” /cmaj.110303 Association Journal (CMAJ) began in 1911 as a specimens and “admirable” hospital relations; it nationalistic response to the Flexner report of served its region well. Queen’s earned a bare 1910 (Medical education in the United States pass: low entrance standards and paltry clinical and Canada: a report to the Carnegie Founda- opportunities were redeemed by a new laboratory tion for the Advancement of Teaching).2 Abun- with “intelligent” methods. Flexner judged Laval dant evidence lies in volume one of CMAJ. in Montréal (the future Université de Montréal) Prompted by concerns about uneven quality as having “indefinite” admission standards, and the lack of up-to-date science in medical “meager” equipment and poor university connec- schools, the American Medical Association’s tions. The branch in Quebec City was similar Council on Medical Education invited the although better connected to its university; how- Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of ever, clinical opportunities were of “limited qual- Teaching to conduct a survey of medical educa- ity,” except for abundant obstetric cases. tion in North America in 1909. Educator Abra- Flexner reserved his harshest criticisms for ham Flexner, who was hand-picked by the the Halifax Medical College in Nova Scotia and Carnegie Foundation’s president, spent 18 the University of Western Ontario in London, months visiting 155 medical schools across Ont. “Feeble” Halifax offered fair basic science North America. In his view and that of the coun- instruction, but hospital appointments were cil, students should be selected through rigorous “made by the government for its own reasons,” admission standards, taught basic sciences by thus forcing the college to grant professorships full-time university professors in well-equipped to unworthy practitioners. Western’s admission laboratories and granted liberal access to clinical standards were “nominal,” clinical facilities cases in hospitals. The gold standard — his “one “entirely inadequate,” and laboratories bright spot” — was Johns Hopkins University.3 “wretched,” while library books were “locked in By 1920, a decade after the Flexner report cases,” for which only the janitor held the key. was released, the number of schools in the No instruction was provided in physiology, phar- United States had declined from 147 to 85 and macology or clinical microscopy, and there was was still falling. Underfunded institutions suf- no dispensary. It was “as bad as anything to be fered most, especially schools for women and found on this side of the line.” African Americans.4 Some closures may have been inevitable because of rising costs; others Key points were the result of mergers.5 Whether Flexner caused these changes or heralded them, his • Abraham Flexner’s influential report on the state of North American report was a blueprint for medical education in medical schools in 1910 created a stir among Canadian medical educators. the following decades. • Canadian physicians protested Flexner’s cavalier methods and unfair Years later, Flexner gloated over his ability to judgments, yet Canadian medical educators used the report as the size up an institution in a few hours: rifling impetus to improve their schools. admission files, strolling the wards, sniffing the • The Flexner report helped physicians realize the need for a platform atmosphere, deceiving his hosts and even bribing for nation-wide dialogue and thus was a key factor in the founding of caretakers to open locked doors.6 “Caustic, arro- the CMAJ in 1911. gant, and uncompromising,” Flexner made ene- © 2011 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors CMAJ, April 19, 2011, 183(7) 811 flexnor-duffin_Layout 1 04/04/11 8:40 AM Page 812 Analysis Flexner concluded that at least three Canadian The laboratories were neither “utterly wretched” schools should close. None did. nor “ill smelling.” Flexner had provoked sur- On July 7, 1910, at the 57th meeting of the prise and resentment among many Halifax grad- Nova Scotia Medical Society in Yarmouth, Dr. uates of outstanding ability and their patients. D.A. Campbell defended the Halifax school and Students would shun the school or leave. The protested its “unfair” characterization as “com- writer warned that without drastic action, this mercial.” His speech was published in both the well-publicized denigration could kill the col- Maritime Medical News (July)8 and the Montreal lege, further shrinking inadequate numbers of Medical Journal (September),9 the two journals Maritime physicians.16 that would fold into the new national successor. In the March 1911 issue of CMAJ, an editor- Macphail would leave the Montreal Medical ial demanded changes in Halifax’s hospital with Journal to edit CMAJ, a transition that he him- specialists and residencies to enhance education self had suggested and been eagerly awaiting and advance science.17 The following month, the since 1907.10 Carnegie report was invoked once again to In December 1910, Albert Le Sage, editor of argue that any “medical school should possess the Union Médicale du Canada, heaped vitriol its own hospital.”18 on Flexner for his “ineptitude” and the “grave Also in April, under the title “The vindication errors” about Laval that he had disseminated so of Laval,” the CMAJ editor proclaimed, “Medical widely, thereby impugning the “prestige” of a education in Canada has nothing to fear from the fine school.11 Why had Flexner not bothered to fiercest light which can be brought to bear upon it. read the materials provided, the editor asked. If defects are revealed, they will be remedied. Then he answered: Because he was “incapable Nothing is desired but the best.”19 Referring sar- of understanding” documents in French. But castically to the privilege of having been Le Sage was also angry that Macphail had inspected formally by the Carnegie foundation, he reprinted the unfair criticisms next to the glow- described the ensuing disappointment of work ing report on McGill in the Montreal Medical “carelessly done.” This editorial included Journal.11 Medical professor L.E. Fortier’s Flexner’s letter of apology to Dean E.P. robust defence of the Laval school followed.12 Lachapelle of Laval in Montréal, expressing “pro- found regret” for having used the wrong catalogue CMAJ came out with both arms to assess the school. (Flexner also published a cor- rection in JAMA.20) In closing, Macphail swinging in January 1911. remarked, “The report has been so justly discred- ited in so many respects that it is difficult to know With its first issue in January 1911, CMAJ what importance to attach to the parts which have came out with both arms swinging. In soaring not been so successfully challenged.”19 prose, Macphail explained the need for a medical Laval had good reason to feel vindicated; with journal to serve Canadian medical needs; he reas- this editorial, Macphail had effectively apologized sured surviving regional journals of no competi- for his insult to Laval in the Montreal Medical tion.13 In solidarity with this medical unity, another Journal. In return, a few weeks later, Le Sage editorial reported that the excellent Toronto and urged his francophone colleagues to join the McGill schools had announced reciprocity for Canadian Medical Association for its interesting each other’s students, committing to exchanges new journal edited by the “experienced” and “cul- and hoping that future possibilities might extend tivated” Macphail.21 The medical nation was unit- across the country and even to Britain.14 ing across geographic and linguistic boundaries. Still in this first issue, anonymous writers for In the October 1911 issue of CMAJ, Cana- both Queen’s and the Halifax Medical College dian schools described improvements and plans protested Flexner’s mistakes and the dangerous for the new semester.22 Again the “misleading” implications of his report. Flexner had spent only Carnegie report was attacked for its “injustice.” “part of an afternoon” at Queen’s in Kingston, But the emergency it had created in Nova Scotia and his count of 80 clinical beds was out by a prompted Dalhousie to come “to the rescue of a colossal factor of 6.15 sorely crippled institution,” saving medical edu- The Haligonian writer took a different tack.16 cation in Halifax for posterity and the region. Praising Flexner’s good intentions to expose Manitoba weighed in, proud of its good grade “incredible” inadequacies of “flimsy” schools, from Flexner but cheekily daring to suggest that he acknowledged local imperfections, blaming Flexner had gone too far in emphasizing labora- them on hostilities between the school and Dal- tory diagnostics over bedside skills. Finally, housie University. But then he too decried the Western defended itself, adopting Flexner’s “prejudiced, inaccurate, and misleading” report. own language: “On this side of the line … no 812 CMAJ, April 19, 2011, 183(7) flexnor-duffin_Layout 1 04/04/11 8:40 AM Page 813 Analysis other medical college in the Dominion was so was still complaining about “American methods unfairly reported.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Flexner Report ― 100 Years Later
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by PubMed Central YAlE JOuRNAl OF BiOlOGY AND MEDiCiNE 84 (2011), pp.269-276. Copyright © 2011. HiSTORiCAl PERSPECTivES iN MEDiCAl EDuCATiON The Flexner Report ― 100 Years Later Thomas P. Duffy, MD Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut The Flexner Report of 1910 transformed the nature and process of medical education in America with a resulting elimination of proprietary schools and the establishment of the bio - medical model as the gold standard of medical training. This transformation occurred in the aftermath of the report, which embraced scientific knowledge and its advancement as the defining ethos of a modern physician. Such an orientation had its origins in the enchant - ment with German medical education that was spurred by the exposure of American edu - cators and physicians at the turn of the century to the university medical schools of Europe. American medicine profited immeasurably from the scientific advances that this system al - lowed, but the hyper-rational system of German science created an imbalance in the art and science of medicine. A catching-up is under way to realign the professional commit - ment of the physician with a revision of medical education to achieve that purpose. In the middle of the 17th century, an cathedrals resonated with Willis’s delin - extraordinary group of scientists and natu - eation of the structure and function of the ral philosophers coalesced as the Oxford brain [1]. Circle and created a scientific revolution in the study and understanding of the brain THE HOPKINS CIRCLE and consciousness.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletteralumni News of the Newyork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Department of Surgery Volume 12, Number 2 Winter 2009
    NEWSLETTERAlumni News of the NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Department of Surgery Volume 12, Number 2 Winter 2009 Virginia Kneeland Frantz and 20th Century Surgical Pathology at Columbia University’s College of Physicians & Surgeons and the Presbyterian Hospital in the City of New York Marianne Wolff and James G. Chandler Virginia Kneeland was born on November 13, 1896 into a at the North East corner of East 70th Street and Madison Avenue. family residing in the Murray Hill district of Manhattan who also Miss Kneeland would receive her primary and secondary education owned and operated a dairy farm in Vermont.1 Her father, Yale at private schools on Manhattan’s East Side and enter Bryn Mawr Kneeland, was very successful in the grain business. Her mother, College in 1914, just 3 months after the Serbian assassination of Aus- Anna Ball Kneeland, would one day become a member of the Board tro-Hungarian, Archduke Franz Ferdinand, which ignited the Great of Managers of the Presbyterian Hospital, which, at the time of her War in Europe. daughter’s birth, had been caring for the sick and injured for 24 years In November of 1896, the College of Physicians and Surgeons graduated second in their class behind Marjorie F. Murray who was (P&S) was well settled on West 59th Street, between 9th and 10th destined to become Pediatrician-in-Chief at Mary Imogene Bassett (Amsterdam) Avenues, flush with new assets and 5 years into a long- Hospital in 1928. sought affiliation with Columbia College.2 In the late 1880s, Vander- Virginia Frantz became the first woman ever to be accepted bilt family munificence had provided P&S with a new classrooms into Presbyterian Hospital’s two year surgical internship.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical School Expansion in the 21St Century Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine
    Medical School Expansion in the 21st Century Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine Michael E. Whitcomb, M.D. and Douglas L. Wood, D.O., Ph.D. September 2015 Cover: University of New England campus Medical School Expansion in the 21st Century Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine Michael E. Whitcomb, M.D. and Douglas L. Wood, D.O., Ph.D. FOREWORD The Macy Foundation has recently documented the motivating factors, major challenges, and planning strategies for the fifteen new allopathic medical schools (leading to the M.D. degree) that enrolled their charter classes between 2009 and 2014.1,2 A parallel trend in the opening of new osteopathic medical schools (leading to the D.O. degree) began in 2003. This expansion will result in a greater proportional increase in the D.O. workforce than will occur in the M.D. workforce as a result of the allopathic expansion. With eleven new osteopathic schools and nine new sites or branches for existing osteopathic schools, there will be more than a doubling of the D.O. graduates in the U.S. by the end of this decade. Douglas Wood, D.O., Ph.D., and Michael Whitcomb, M.D., bring their broad experiences in D.O. and M.D. education to this report of the osteopathic school expansion. They identify ways in which the new schools are similar to and different from the existing osteopathic schools, and they identify differences in the rationale and characteristics of the new osteopathic schools, compared with those of the new allopathic schools that Dr. Whitcomb has previously chronicled. 1 Whitcomb ME.
    [Show full text]
  • US Medical Education Reformers Abraham Flexner (1866-1959) and Simon Flexner (1863-1946)
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 443 765 SO 031 860 AUTHOR Parker, Franklin; Parker, Betty J. TITLE U.S. Medical Education Reformers Abraham Flexner (1866-1959) and Simon Flexner (1863-1946). PUB DATE 2000-00-00 NOTE 12p. PUB TYPE Reports Descriptive (141) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Biographies; *Educational Change; *Educational History; Higher Education; *Medical Education; *Professional Recognition; *Social History IDENTIFIERS *Flexner (Abraham); Johns Hopkins University MD; Reform Efforts ABSTRACT This paper (in the form of a dialogue) tells the stories of two members of a remarkable family of nine children, the Flexners of Louisville, Kentucky. The paper focuses on Abraham and Simon, who were reformers in the field of medical education in the United States. The dialogue takes Abraham Flexner through his undergraduate education at Johns Hopkins University, his founding of a school that specialized in educating wealthy (but underachieving) boys, and his marriage to Anne Laziere Crawford. Abraham and his colleague, Henry S. Pritchett, traveled around the country assessing 155 medical schools in hopes of professionalizing medical education. The travels culminated in a report on "Medical Education in the United States and Canada" (1910). Abraham capped his career by creating the first significant "think tank," the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey. The paper also profiles Simon Flexner, a pharmacist whose dream was to become a pathologist. Simon, too, gravitated to Johns Hopkins University where he became chief pathologist and wrote over 200 pathology and bacteriology reports between 1890-1909. He also helped organize the Peking Union Medical College in Peking, China, and was appointed Eastman Professor at Oxford University.(BT) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document.
    [Show full text]
  • Abraham Flexner As Critic of British and Continental Medical Education
    Medical History, 1989, 33: 472-479. ABRAHAM FLEXNER AS CRITIC OF BRITISH AND CONTINENTAL MEDICAL EDUCATION by THOMAS NEVILLE BONNER * When Abraham Flexner landed in England in October 1910, he was already well known in British medical circles. His report on medical education in the United States and Canada, published earlier in the year, had been widely distributed in Europe by Nicholas Murray Butler, an influential trustee of the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. When Flexner called on the president of the Royal College of Surgeons, Henry Butlin, on 8 October, Butlin told him of the impact his American study had made in Britain. "You didn't need any letter of introduction from Osler," Flexner recounted the conversation, "I've read your report, it's masterly. I am preparing a memorial to the Royal Commission on London University and you are my authority-see here, here's your Report ... every margin filled with pencil comments showing how you have analyzed our difficulties for us . Flexner's arrival in Britain was timely. Medical education throughout the island was in turmoil. Dissatisfaction with the variety of routes to licensure, the wide differences between Scottish and London requirements for degrees, and the rigidity of the seniority system within the hospitals had been growing since the 1880s. In addition, new concerns over British backwardness in laboratory study and scientific research were creating a sense of crisis in those aware of developments in Germany and America.2 William Osler himself, who had arrived at Oxford to fill the Regius Chair in 1905, had sharply criticized a year earlier the neglect of laboratory studies in British medical schools in a widely reported address at the London Hospital.3 Flexner conferred with Osler and other members of the British medical establishment on his arrival in Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • Abraham Flexner and His Views on Learning in Higher Education
    Iwabuchi Sachiko(p139)6/2 04.9.6 3:13 PM ページ 139 The Japanese Journal of American Studies, No. 15 (2004) The Pursuit of Excellence: Abraham Flexner and His Views on Learning in Higher Education Sachiko IWABUCHI* INTRODUCTION Abraham Flexner, one of the most influential educational critics in early twentieth-century America, faithfully believed in excellence. Ex- cellence epitomized his views on education. “Throughout my life,” Flexner wrote in his autobiography, “I have pursued excellence.”1 For Flexner, excellence meant more than surpassing skills, eminence, and dignity; excellence meant intellectual rather than mere mental training. It also connoted honor and spirituality rather than mercantilism and materialism. For Flexner an aristocracy of excellence is “the truest form of democracy.”2 The topic of excellence has become conspicuous in the discussions of university reform in Japan. The Twenty-First Century Centers of Ex- cellence (COE) Program was established based on the Ministry of Edu- cation, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology’s report “A Policy for the Structural Reform of National Universities,” under which a new funding mechanism has been implemented to subsidize the formation of research bases.3 Although the goal of the COEs is to promote excellent research results, some scholars have argued that the proposed program could drive researchers to commercially successful projects in order to Copyright © 2004 Sachiko Iwabuchi. All rights reserved. This work may be used, with this notice included, for noncommercial purposes. No copies of this work may be distrib- uted, electronically or otherwise, in whole or in part, without permission from the author. *Ph. D.
    [Show full text]
  • American Osler Society
    47th Annual Meeting of the American Osler Society Sunday, April 9th – Wednesday, April 12th, 2017 Emory Conference Center Hotel Atlanta, Georgia The image on the cover is of Sir William Osler and is on display on the Emory University campus in the James B. Williams Medical Education Building. The artist and history of the piece is unknown. 47th Annual Meeting of the AMERICAN OSLER SOCIETY Sunday, April 9th - Wednesday, April 12th, 2017 Emory Conference Center Hotel Atlanta, Georgia Photo courtesy of Osler Library of the History of Medicine, McGill University Course Objectives Upon conclusion of this program, participants should be able to: Describe new research findings in the history of medicine. Outline the evolution of medicine in a particular disease. List professional contributions made by others in medicine. Intended Audience The target audience includes physicians and others interested in Osler, medical history and any of the medically oriented humanities who research and write on a range of issues. Attendees will acknowledge the diversity of topics discussed and the spectrum of research techniques employed to investigate hypotheses, frame arguments, and draw conclusions. The themes addressed are comprehensible to all health care providers, making the content and conclusions accessible to the participants regardless of their main professional identity. CME Accreditation and Designation This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the accreditation requirements and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint providership of The University of Arizona College of Medicine – Tucson and the American Osler Society. The University of Arizona College of Medicine - Tucson is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    [Show full text]
  • Dreams ATSU-SOMA’S Inaugural Class 92 New D.O.S Graduate in Our Point of View
    Dreams come true 92 new D.O.s graduate in ATSU-SOMA’s inaugural class Vol. 6, No. 2 • Fall 2011 Vol. Our point of view ATSU celebrated five commencements this spring, and you’re looking at a few of the 92 new D.O.s who graduated from ATSU-SOMA’s inaugural class in June. A.T. STILL UNIVERSITY Board of Trustees 2011 Carl G. Bynum, D.O., M.P.H., ’75 Chair Jefferson City, Mo. Friends, Kenneth E. Jones, D.O., ’83 It seems like every issue of the magazine is special, and this one is, Vice Chair Clinton, Mo. too, celebrating the first graduating class of our School of Osteopathic Medicine in Arizona. SOMA began as a dream six years ago when Dr. Cynthia D. Byler, D.O., M.P.H., Douglas L. Wood joined us as the founding dean. Now the dream has KCOM ’85, SHM ’04 Secretary become reality as 92 men and women of the inaugural class took part St. Louis, Mo. in commencement ceremonies on June 3 and, receiving their D.O. degrees, became osteopathic physicians. I am proud of each and ev- Richard W. Anderson, D.O., FACGP, ’46 ery one of them, and I am equally proud of the innovative curriculum Dallas, Texas which Dr. Wood and his staff have implemented and which Interim Manuel C. Bedoya, D.M.D. Dean Thomas McWilliams is carrying on. Tucson, Ariz. Daniel L. Biery, D.O., FACOI, FACG, ’72 from the At the Innovators’ Gala the evening before Phelps, N.Y. commencement I had the distinct privilege of presenting to Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 SGEA Regional Meeting Abstract Compendium
    2020 SGEA Regional Meeting Abstract Compendium 0 Contents Message from the SGEA Chair ....................................................................................................... 2 Message from the 2020 SGEA Conference Host ........................................................................... 3 Special Thank You and Acknowledgements .................................................................................. 4 SGEA Awards ................................................................................................................................. 5 Innovation Abstracts ....................................................................................................................... 6 Research Abstracts ...................................................................................................................... 135 Small Group, Workshop and Panel Discussion Abstracts .......................................................... 247 List of SGEA Steering Committee Members ............................................................................. 324 List of 2020 SGEA Regional Conference Planning Committee Members ................................. 325 2020 SGEA Reviewers ............................................................................................................... 327 1 Message from the SGEA Chair Dear Colleagues, I am so pleased to join with my peer regional GEA chairs and the AAMC medical education team in offering this important compendium of medical education innovation and scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • Electives and Career Planning
    Electives and Career Planning John Graneto, D.O., M.Ed. Professor and Associate Dean Disclosure • This study was supported by a grant from the American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine and the Osteopathic Heritage Foundation. IRB • This study was reviewed by the IRB at Midwestern University, Downers Grove IL. Acknowledgements • Statistical Support provided by: • Matthew S. Mayo, Ph.D., MBA • Founding Chair and Professor, Department of Biostatistics • KU Medical Center, Kansas City Introduction • Osteopathic medical students face decisions such as “should they enter primary care or a specialty field?” • Factors that ultimately influence an individual medical student’s specialty choice are also varied. 1,2 • What is less well described are the rotation elective choices students make based on entering these specialties. • The objective for this study is to compare the elective choices that students make. Background • Medical school curricula, generally consist of earlier years of foundational teachings in the science-based disciplines or systems and during the later years more clinically focused rotation-based bedside patient encounters with physician preceptors.6,7 • Every year thousands of osteopathic medical students throughout the country make the transition from these pre-clinical classroom years to the rotation-based clinical experiences.8,9 Background • Each student may have limited number of electives • Perceived lifestyle of that career choice is cited as one factor that influences students’ decisions to match in a
    [Show full text]
  • Promoting a More Adaptable Physician Pipeline
    Promoting a More Adaptable Physician Pipeline FDA & Health James C. Capretta The views expressed are those of the author in his personal capacity and not in her official/professional capacity. To cite this paper: James C. Capretta, “Promoting a More Adaptable Physician Pipeline”, released by the Regulatory Transparency Project of the Federalist Society, February 26, 2020 (https://regproject.org/wp- content/uploads/RTP-FDA-Health-Working-Group-Paper-Physician-Supply.pdf). This paper adapted from a report originally published by the American Enterprise Institute under the title “Policies affecting the number of physicians in the US and a framework for reform” (https://www.aei.org/wp- content/uploads/2020/03/Report-Policies-affecting-the-number-of-physicians-in-the-US-and-a-framework-for- reform.pdf) March 25, 2020 Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Introduction 3-4 A Top-line Perspective 4-6 Historical Context 6-7 Basic Framework for Physician Licensure in the US 7-9 Foreign-Born Physicians and International Medical Graduates 9-12 Public Subsidies and Policies for Graduate Medical Education 12-15 More GME Funding Is Not the Answer 15-16 The Role of the Medicare Fee Schedule 17-18 Toward a More Flexible and Adaptable Pipeline of Prospective Physicians 18-20 Conclusion 21 2 Executive Summary Since the latter half of the 19th century, the medical profession has been effectively regulating itself through state medical boards and control of the organizations that certify educational and training institutions. The federal government participates in (but does not directly control) residency programs through partial funding provided mainly by Medicare.
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of Problem-Based Learning and Its Impact on Medical Students’ Attitudes and Academic Outcomes: a Meta-Analysis
    An Examination of Problem-Based Learning and its Impact on Medical Students’ Attitudes and Academic Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis by Alexandria L. Brice A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Auburn, Alabama May 7, 2017 Keywords: meta-analysis, active learning, medical students, problem-based learning, attitudinal behavior Copyright 2017 by Alexandria L. Brice Approved by James E. Witte, Chair, Professor, Educational Foundations, Leadership, and Technology Maria M. Witte, Professor, Educational Foundations, Leadership, and Technology Leslie A. Cordie, Assistant Professor of Educational Foundations, Leadership, and Technology Melody L. Russell, Associate Professor of Curriculum and Teaching Abstract This study examined the relationship of Problem-based Learning (PBL) and medical students’ attitudinal behavior and academic outcomes. The analyses of 14 independent, primary studies conducted between 2003 –2016, on 4,981 medical students across various medical schools were included in the study. The data were examined using a meta-analysis technique. Limits were set as a means to include and exclude research studies. Studies were considered for inclusion if the study resulted in effect sizes or statistics that could be converted to effect sizes. Articles related to academic outcomes and attitudinal behaviors of medical students’ use of PBL were included. Studies that were qualitative in nature were excluded due to the statistical analysis required for meta-analysis. Educational environments outside of medical education environments and education programs outside of medical education were also excluded. Studies were identified and examined to distinguish their congruence within the inclusion criteria. Studies that were included evaluated: PBL as an active learning technique, PBL in medical classrooms and settings, medical students’ attitudinal behaviors, perceptions, and academic outcomes.
    [Show full text]