DOCSLIB.ORG

Soil Survey of Gallatin County Area, Montana

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Soil Survey of Gallatin County Area, Montana How to Use This Soil Survey Detailed Soil Maps The detailed soil maps can be useful in planning the use and management of small areas. To find information about your area of interest, you can locate the Section, Township, and Range by zooming in on the Index to Map Sheets, or you can go to the Web Soil Survey at (http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/). Note the map unit symbols that are in that area. The Contents lists the map units by symbol and name and shows the page where each map unit is described. See the Contents for sections of this publication that may address your specific needs. 2 This soil survey is a publication of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Major fieldwork for this soil survey was completed in 1995. Soil names and descriptions were approved in 1996. Unless otherwise indicated, statements in this publication refer to conditions in the survey area in 1996. This survey was made cooperatively by the Natural Resources Conservation Service and the Montana Agricultural Experiment Station. It is part of the technical assistance furnished to the Gallatin County Conservation District. The most current official data are available through the NRCS Soil Data Mart website at http://soildatamart.nrcs.usda.gov. Soil maps in this survey may be copied without permission. Enlargement of these maps, however, could cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping. If enlarged, maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a larger scale. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all of its programs on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact the USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice or TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call 202-720-5964 (voice or TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Cover: This view of the snow-covered Bridger Mountains contains both private and public lands. The foreground soils of Adel-Copenhaver complex and the drainageway soils of Bridger-Redlodge complex are on private land while the Yellowmule-Lonnibee, stony complex soils in the timber-covered foothills are on public land. The public land, including the Bridger Mountains, has been mapped in the “Soil Survey of Gallatin National Forest, Montana” (1996). Additional information about the Nation’s natural resources is available online from the Natural Resources Conservation Service at http://www.nrcs.usda.gov. 3 Contents Part I Crop Yield Estimates .......................................... 30 Land Capability Classification ............................. 31 How To Use This Soil Survey ................................. 1 Prime Farmland and Other Important Index to Taxonomic Units ..................................... 17 Farmland ...................................................... 32 Index to Map Units ................................................ 19 Erosion Factors .................................................. 33 Summary of Tables ............................................... 31 Windbreaks and Environmental Plantings ........... 33 Foreword ............................................................... 33 Range ................................................................... 173 How This Survey Was Made .................................. 35 Similarity Index ................................................. 174 General Nature of the Survey Area ....................... 36 Rangeland Management ................................... 174 History ................................................................ 36 Understory Management ................................... 175 Industry and Transportation ................................. 37 Forest Land ......................................................... 353 Physiography and Drainage ................................ 38 Woodland Ordination System ............................ 354 Geologic History and Regional Geology .............. 38 Forest Land Management and Productivity ....... 356 Geologic Units .................................................... 39 Main Forest Access Road Limitations and Mineral Resources .............................................. 41 Hazards ...................................................... 356 Ground Water Resources .................................... 42 Recreation ........................................................... 389 Seismic Activity ................................................. 43 Wildlife Habitat .................................................... 445 Climate ............................................................... 43 Elements of Wildlife Habitat .............................. 445 Formation and Classification of the Soils ........... 53 Kinds of Wildlife Habitat .................................... 445 Formation of the Soils......................................... 53 Wildlife of the Gallatin County Area .................. 446 Classification of the Soils ................................... 54 Engineering ......................................................... 449 Soil Series and Detailed Map Units...................... 61 Building Site Development ................................ 449 References ........................................................... 385 Sanitary Facilities ............................................. 450 Glossary .............................................................. 387 Waste Management .......................................... 451 Construction Materials ...................................... 452 Water Management ........................................... 453 Part II Soil Properties .................................................... 679 Engineering Index Properties ............................ 679 How To Use This Soil Survey ................................. 1 Physical and Chemical Properties .................... 680 Detailed Soil Map Unit Legend ............................... 4 Water Features ................................................. 682 Summary of Tables ............................................... 14 Soil Features .................................................... 683 Agronomy .............................................................. 29 References ......................................................... 1027 Cropland Limitations and Hazards ....................... 29 Glossary ............................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wheatland Statement of Infrastructure Deficiency
    Statement Of Infrastructure Deficiency in the Industrial and Commercial area Of the Wheatland Census Designated Place (CDP) Broadwater County Figure 1. Wheatland Area of Broadwater County Wheatland Targeted Economic Development District Introduction TEDD Draft property Boundary On October 8th of 2018, the Montana Business Assistance Connection, on behalf of Broadwater 22 County entered into a contract with Community 7a Development Services of Montana to assist the 8a County in the proposed creation of a Targeted 9a Economic Development District (TEDD) in the Wheatland industrial and commercial area of the County. The first step in establishing a TEDD is to conduct a review of infrastructure deficiencies within the area proposed for inclusion in a TEDD. 21 6a The documentation of such deficiencies, within a 2a 3a 4a municipality (defined as a county, city or town or 1a consolidated city-county government), in accordance with state law, provides the necessary 8 20 foundation upon which a local government may 7 5a establish a TEDD to foster secondary, value-adding 6 19 5 4 18 economic development. 2 3 9 1 10 12 14 16 11 13 15 The Wheatland industrial and commercial area, 17 13a comprised of nearly 1,000 acres, is generally 12a 10a 11a 15a located along US Highway 287, just north of the 14a Interstate 90 – Highway 287 intersection (Figure 2). It includes the Wheat Montana Bakery and the proposed site of Bridger Brewing, both value- Figure 2 Wheatland Industrial and Commercial Area (draft adding businesses. The creation of a TEDD will map – red lines (does not include orange lines)) enable Broadwater County to encourage the retention, expansion and recruitment of these enterprises, as well as complimentary and compatible value-adding businesses, which will contribute to the overall economic well-being of the County.
    [Show full text]
  • MONTANA N7 4Qea
    E 12, p( /F- o77 (r 2) Sf(jji PGJ/F-077(82) National Uranium Resource Evaluation 6 BOZEMAN QUADRANGLE 41 MONTANA n7 4QeA/ University of Montana Missoula, Montana and Montana State University Bozeman, Montana E2T oFi Issue Date August 1982 SATESO9 PREPARED FOR THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Energy Grand Junction Area Office, Colorado rmetadc957781 Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed in this report, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. This report is a result of work performed by the University of Montana and Montana State University, through a Bendix Field Engineering Corporation subcontract, as part of the National Uranium Resource Evaluation. NURE was a program of the U.S. Department of Energy's Grand Junction, Colorado, Office to acquire and compile geologic and other information with which to assess the magnitude and distribution of uranium resources and to determine areas favorable for the occurrence of uranium in the United States. Available from: Technical Library Bendix Field Engineering Corporation P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Wetland and Riparian Resource Assessment of the Gallatin Valley and Bozeman Creek Watershed, Gallatin County, Montana
    WETLAND AND RIPARIAN RESOURCE ASSESSMENT OF THE GALLATIN VALLEY AND BOZEMAN CREEK WATERSHED, GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA Prepared By Alan English and Corey Baker Gallatin Local Water Quality District For Montana Department of Environmental Quality June 2004 Table of Contents Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS v PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND 1 Importance of Wetlands Importance or Riparian Ares Funding Project Area Description Hydrogeologic Setting STEERING COMMITTEE 7 LIMITATIONS 7 Inventory vs. Delineation CIR Imagery and GIS Database Historical Mapping PROJECT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND TASKS 8 Overview and Assessment of Goals and Objectives DEVELOPMENT OF ORTHORECTIFIED CIR IMAGERY 10 Fundamentals of Using CIR Aerial Photography to Map Wetlands Color Infrared Aerial Photography of the Gallatin Valley Transforming CIR Aerial Photographs Into Digital Photographs Orthorectification of Digital CIR Photographs and Creation of CIR DOQs NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY (NWI) MAPPING 15 Information Provided by NWI Results ASSESSMENT OF CURRENT CONDITIONS 16 Review of Subdivision Documents and Conservation Easements for Wetlands Description of Wetland and Riparian GIS Layers Mapping Conventions Analysis of Wetlands and Riparian Areas on CIR Imagery Ground-Truthing and Low Altitude Aerial Survey Inventory of Wetlands and Riparian Areas GIS Project CD Attributes of the Wetlands GIS Layer Attributes of the Riparian/Wetland Mixed GIS Layer i Table of Contents (Continued) Page HISTORICAL IMPACTS FROM HUMAN ACTIVITIES (1800-2001) 28 Oral History Interviews as Insight The Pattern of
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2017 Golden Eagle Migration Survey Big Belt Mountains, Montana
    Fall 2017 Golden Eagle Migration Survey Big Belt Mountains, Montana (Photo by David Brandes) Report prepared by: Steve Hoffman & Bret Davis Report submitted to: U.S. Forest Service, Helena-Lewis & Clark National Forest ATTN: Denise Pengeroth, Forest Biologist 3425 Skyway Drive, Helena, MT 59602 March 2018 FALL 2017 GOLDEN EAGLE MIGRATION SURVEY IN THE BIG BELT MOUNTAINS, MONTANA Report prepared by: Steve Hoffman & Bret Davis Counts conducted by: Jeff Grayum & Hilary Turner Project coordinated by: GEMS Committee Project Coordinator: Janice Miller, President Last Chance Audubon, P.O. Box 924, Helena, MT 59624-0001 Report submitted to: U.S. Forest Service, Helena-Lewis & Clark National Forest ATTN: Denise Pengeroth, Forest Biologist 3425 Skyway Drive, Helena, MT 59602 March 2018 i TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables .....................................................................................................................................iii List of Figures ....................................................................................................................................iii List of Appendices .............................................................................................................................iv Introduction .........................................................................................................................................1 Study Site ............................................................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • The 1898 Field Season of CD Walcott
    Field work and fossils in southwestern Montana: the 1898 field season of C. D. Walcott Ellis L. Yochelson Research Associate, Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC 20013-7012 G. Zieg Senior Geologist, Teck Cominco American Inc., East 15918 Euclid, Spokane, WA 99216 INTRODUCTION In 1879, Charles Doolittle Walcott (1850- 1927) (Yochelson, 1998) joined the new U. S. Geological Survey (USGS) and July 1, 1894, became the third director of the agency. Shortly before that time the USGS had several field parties starting to investigate mining dis- tricts in Montana and Idaho. There was no overall stratigraphic succession, nor clear cor- relation from one mining district to another. In 1895, Walcott took a first quick trip through the Belt Mountains. In the vicinity of Neihart, Montana, he collected Middle Cambrian fossils (Weed, 1900). These fossils established that Lower Cambrian rocks were absent from the area and thus the Belt strata (or Algonkian, as USGS Walcott called them) were pre-Cambrian in age The unhyphenated usage and the lack of capi- ABSTRACT talization of “formation” are relatively late de- velopments in stratigraphic nomenclature. The diary of Charles Doolittle Walcott pro- vides a brief daily account of his investigations For more than fifty years, Walcott used a small of Cambrian and Precambrian rocks, mainly in pocket diary and with his comments one can the Belt Mountains during one field season. trace his route and gain some notion of how These entries also give some notion of the tri- field work was conducted before the days of als of field work before the development of the rapid automobile transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nss Bulletin
    THE NSS BULLETIN QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL SPELEOLOGICAL SOCIETY VOLUME 39 APRIL 1977 NUMBER 2 Contents Possible Exhumed Fossil Caverns in the Madison Group (Mississippian) of the Northern Rocky Mountains: A Discussion ............. ... ... .. ............... Newell P . Campbell 43 Archeology and Speleology: The Case for Conservation ............... .. David G. Anderson 55 The NSS Bulletin is published quarterly, in January, April, July, and October. Material to be included in a given number must be received at least 90 days prior to the first of the month in which publication is desired. The subscription rate in effect 1 August 1975: $10.00 per year. Oj/lce Address. NATIONAL SPELEOLOGICAL SOCIETY CAVE AVENUE HUNTSVILLE, ALABAMA 35810 Discussion of papers published in the Bulletin is invited. Discussion should be 2,000 words or less in length, with not more than 3 illustrations. Discussions should be forwarded to the appropriate editor within three months of publication of the original paper. MANAGING EDITOR JamaHectaes Big Cove Tannery Pennsylvania 17212 CONSERVATION EDITOR EXPLORATION EDITOR W.P. Bishop Barry F. Beck 5402 Wilson Lane Geology Department Bethesda, Md. 20014 Georgia Southwestern College Americus, Ga. 31709 LIFE SCIENCES EDITOR EARTH SCIENCES EDITOR Francis G. Howarth William B. White Bernice P. Bishop Museum Materials Research Laboratory Box6037 210 Engineering Science Building Honolulu, Haw. 96818 The Pennsylvania State University University Park, Pa. 16802 SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITOR ANTHROPOLOGY EDITOR Stuart Sprague Maxine Haldemann-Klelndienst School of Social Sciences, UPO 846 162 Beechwood Avenue Morehead State University Willowdale, Ontario Morehead, Ky. 40351 Canada M2L !Kl Copyright 1977 by the National Speleological Society, Inc. The photocopying or reproduction or recording by any electrical or mechanical process of more than two pages of any issue of this journal still in print is a violation of copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy and Depositional Environments of the Three Forks Formation (Upper Devonian), Williston Basin, North Dakota Gayle M
    University of North Dakota UND Scholarly Commons Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects 1984 Stratigraphy and depositional environments of the Three Forks Formation (Upper Devonian), Williston Basin, North Dakota Gayle M. Dumonceaux University of North Dakota Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/theses Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Dumonceaux, Gayle M., "Stratigraphy and depositional environments of the Three Forks Formation (Upper Devonian), Williston Basin, North Dakota" (1984). Theses and Dissertations. 76. https://commons.und.edu/theses/76 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STRATIGRAPHY AND DEPm:ITIONAL ENVIRONMENTS OF THE THREE FORKS FORMi,TION (UPPER DEVONIAN) , WILLISTON BASIN, NORTH DAKOTA by Gayle M. D1monceaux Bachelor of Arts, St. Clot,d State University, 1981 A Tiu,sis Submitted to the ,;raduate Faculty of the University of North Dakota in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the d~gree of Master of Science Grand Forks, forth Dakota Augt,st GEOLOGY LIBRARY 198L Uainrsity nf Nort~ Dakltl / I This thesis submitted by Gayle M. Dumonceaux in partial fulfillment of t:he requirements for the degree of Master of Science from the Uni\rersity of North Dakota is hereby approved by the Faculty Advisory Collllnittee under whom the work has been done. (Chairman) This thesis meets the standards for appearance and conforms to the style and format requirements of the Graduate School of the University of !'forth Dakota, and is hereby approved.
    [Show full text]
  • Gallatin County, Montana Hazard Mitigation Plan Final Draft
    GALLATIN COUNTY, MONTANA HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN FINAL DRAFT PREPARED FOR Gallatin County, Montana 311 W. Main Street Bozeman, MT 59715 APRIL 2019 Photo Credit: Gallatin County Emergency Management EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Disasters can strike at any time in any place. In many cases, actions can be taken before disasters strike to reduce or eliminate potential negative impacts. These actions can often mitigate the adverse effects of disasters and protect life, property, the economic and other values. The Gallatin County Hazard Mitigation Plan (HMP) addresses 19 major hazards with respect to risk and vulnerabilities countywide, including the communities of Bozeman, Belgrade, Big Sky, Manhattan, Three Forks, and West Yellowstone. Through a collaborative planning process, the Gallatin County hazards were identified, researched, profiled, and prioritized. In addition, Montana State University (MSU) elected to update their 2013 Pre- Disaster Mitigation (PDM) Plan as an annex to the county’s HMP. The MSU Annex is designated as Annex A and is included in its entirety following the HMP Sections. The major hazards are each profiled in terms of their hazard description, history, probability and magnitude, mapping, vulnerabilities, data limitations, and other factors. The vulnerabilities to critical facilities; critical infrastructure; structures; the population; economic, ecologic, historic, and social values; and future development are updated for each hazard. Based on the probability and extent of potential impacts that were identified in the risk assessment, the prioritizations of hazards within Gallatin County are displayed in Table ES-1. The countywide prioritizations are derived from hazard prioritization and ranking exercises held in five distinct community areas (districts) across the county in February 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • PRELIMINARY GEOLOGIC MAP of the BOZEMAN 30' X 60
    PRELIMINARY GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE BOZEMAN 30’ x 60’ QUADRANGLE SOUTHWESTERN MONTANA Compiled and mapped by Susan M. Vuke1, Jeffrey D. Lonn1, Richard B. Berg1, and Karl S. Kellogg2 Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Open File Report MBMG 469 2002 Minor revisions: 1/03 Text revised and plate removed: 6/03 References added, Plate 2 removed: superseded by Geologic Map of Western and Northern Gallatin Valley (Vuke, 2003). Page 2 text changed to reflect this. 1Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology 2U.S. Geological Survey This report has been reviewed for conformity with Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology’s technical and editorial standards. Partial support has been provided by the STATEMAP component of the National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program of the U.S. Geological Survey under contract number 02HQAG0038, and Montana Department of Transportation under contract CFDA number 20.205. PRELIMINARY GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE BOZEMAN 30’ x 60’ QUADRANGLE This geologic map of the Bozeman 30’x 60’ quadrangle is released with the intention that it will be followed by a revised version that incorporates new mapping of the Cenozoic deposits, including Geologic Map of Northern and Western Gallatin Valley, Southwestern Montana (Vuke, 2003). Ash samples have been collected for 40Ar/39Ar dates from Tertiary beds in the Madison bluffs and Storey Hills areas, and the results will also be included in a future version of the enclosed map. The senior author has made tentative structural interpretations on the enclosed map that are based on map patterns but with only minimal subsurface data. These interpretations were not shown on the earlier blueline version of Plate 1 (MBMG Open file report 334).
    [Show full text]
  • Sedimentary Tectonics of the Mesoproterozoic Lahood
    SEDIMENTARY TECTONICS OF THE MESOPROTEROZOIC LAHOOD FORMATION SOUTHWEST, MONTANA by Nicholas Reid Fox A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment Of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Earth Sciences MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Bozeman, Montana January 2017 ©COPYRIGHT By Nicholas, Reid, Fox 2017 All Rights Reserved iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to dedicate this work to my wife and family whose love and support have been essential in my pursuit of higher education and research. I would also like to acknowledge my peers who have provided guidance throughout this study. This research would not be possible without funding from the Donald L. Smith Memorial Scholarship, Tobacco Root Geological Society Harrison Scholarship and National Science Foundation. May this thesis be an acknowledgement to the crucial work completed by William J. McMannis (1924-1973) on the Bridger Range geology (1955) and the LaHood Formation (1963), which has been paramount to the interpretations made by this study. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 Significance of Research ................................................................................................. 1 Belt Basin Geologic Setting ............................................................................................ 1 Historical Background..................................................................................................... 9 2. FIELD RELATIONS ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Masks up Big Sky's Busy Summer
    July 17 - 30, 2020 Volume 11 // Issue #15 Montana masks up Big Sky’s busy summer Yellowstone Club proposes land exchange with Forest Service Writer, artist duo chronicle pandemic life Golf marathon raises funds for nonprofit TABLE OF CONTENTS OPINION.................................................................... 4 BUSINESS.................................................................33 LOCAL NEWS BRIEFS..................................................6 HEALTH......................................................................35 LOCAL......................................................................... 8 SPORTS......................................................................37 OP NEWS....................................................................14 DINING.....................................................................42 ENVIRONMENT & OUTDOORS..................................17 ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT..........................................29 FUN............................................................................45 July 17 - 30, 2020 Montana masks up Volume 11, Issue No. 15 12 Effective July 15, Gov. Steve Bullock issued a mandatory statewide mask requirement for Owned and published in Big Sky, Montana counties with four or more active cases of COVID-19. This directive applies to certain indoor spaces and certain organized outdoor activities with 50 or more people in attendance where PUBLISHER social distancing is not possible. Eric Ladd | [email protected] EDITORIAL Big Sky’s busy summer 8
    [Show full text]
  • BOUGUER GRAVITY, AEROMAGNE'"Fic, and GENERALIZED GEOLOGIC MAP of the EASTERN PART of the THREE FORKS BASIN, BROADWATER MADISON, and GALLATIN COUNTIES, MONTANA by W
    00 0> ~ I 0.. 0 0.. <( :E DEPARTMENT OF· THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BOUGUER GRAVITY, AEROMAGNE'"fiC, AND GENERALIZED GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE EASTERN PART OF THE THREE FORKS BASIN, BROADWATER MADISON, AND GALLATIN COUNTIES, MONTANA By W. E. Davis, W. T. Kinoshita, and G. D. Robinson GEOPHYSICAL INVESTIGATIONS MAP GP-498 00 0> ...r a.I PUBLISHED BY THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 0 WASHINGTON, D. C. 0.. <( 1965 ~ DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TO ACCOMPANY MAP GP-498 UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BOUGUER GRAVITY, AEROMAGNETIC, AND GENERALIZED GEOLOGIC MAP OF TH~E EASTE.RN PART ·OF THE THREE FORKS BASIN, BROADWATER, MADISON, AND GALLATIN COUNTIES, MONTANA By W. E. Davis, W. T. Kinoshita, and G. D. Robinson Introduction General geology Gravity and aeromagnetic surveys were made in the The geology and hyctrology of the eastern part of the Three Forks Basin, southwestern Montana, as part of a basin itself are fairly well understood, mainly as a re­ geologic study of intermontane basins along the upper suit of the work of Hackett and others ( 1960). The hilly Missouri River. The work was done primarily to de- northwestern and mountainous eastern borders of the 'teet concealed igneous rocks andtodeterminethecon- basin have also been mapped in detail, recently, by.· figuration of the bedrock surface beneath Cenozoic Peter Verrall (1955) and McMannis (1955), respective­ continental sedimentary deposits that occupy the main . ly. The geology of the mountains to the south, however, valleys. This information was used in conjunction with· is poorly known, mostly from r~connaissance studies, the results of geologic mapping to interpret other con- by Peale (1893, 1896) and Clabaugh (1952).
    [Show full text]