DOCSLIB.ORG

Soil Survey of Gallatin County Area, Montana

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

How to Use This Soil Survey Detailed Soil Maps The detailed soil maps can be useful in planning the use and management of small areas. To find information about your area of interest, you can locate the Section, Township, and Range by zooming in on the Index to Map Sheets, or you can go to the Web Soil Survey at (http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/). Note the map unit symbols that are in that area. The Contents lists the map units by symbol and name and shows the page where each map unit is described. See the Contents for sections of this publication that may address your specific needs. 2 This soil survey is a publication of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Major fieldwork for this soil survey was completed in 1995. Soil names and descriptions were approved in 1996. Unless otherwise indicated, statements in this publication refer to conditions in the survey area in 1996. This survey was made cooperatively by the Natural Resources Conservation Service and the Montana Agricultural Experiment Station. It is part of the technical assistance furnished to the Gallatin County Conservation District. The most current official data are available through the NRCS Soil Data Mart website at http://soildatamart.nrcs.usda.gov. Soil maps in this survey may be copied without permission. Enlargement of these maps, however, could cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping. If enlarged, maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a larger scale. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all of its programs on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact the USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice or TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call 202-720-5964 (voice or TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Cover: This view of the snow-covered Bridger Mountains contains both private and public lands. The foreground soils of Adel-Copenhaver complex and the drainageway soils of Bridger-Redlodge complex are on private land while the Yellowmule-Lonnibee, stony complex soils in the timber-covered foothills are on public land. The public land, including the Bridger Mountains, has been mapped in the “Soil Survey of Gallatin National Forest, Montana” (1996). Additional information about the Nation’s natural resources is available online from the Natural Resources Conservation Service at http://www.nrcs.usda.gov. 3 Contents Part I 690E—Accola-Whitore, stony complex, cool, 15 to 45 percent slopes ............................... 69 How To Use This Soil Survey ................................. 1 Adel Series ........................................................ 70 Index to Taxonomic Units .................................... 17 614F—Adel loam, 15 to 60 percent slopes ....... 70 Index to Map Units ............................................... 19 314C—Adel loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes ........... 71 Summary of Tables ............................................... 31 314E—Adel loam, 8 to 25 percent slopes ......... 71 Foreword ............................................................... 33 614D—Adel loam, cool, 4 to 15 percent How This Survey Was Made ................................ 35 slopes .......................................................... 71 General Nature of the Survey Area..................... 36 814D—Adel-Copenhaver complex, 4 to 15 History................................................................ 36 percent slopes ............................................. 72 Industry and Transportation ............................... 37 814E—Adel-Copenhaver complex, 15 to 35 Physiography and Drainage............................... 38 percent slopes ............................................. 72 Geologic History and Regional Geology ........... 38 414E—Adel-Libeg complex, 15 to 35 percent Geologic Units ................................................... 39 slopes .......................................................... 73 Mineral Resources ............................................. 41 714E—Adel-Uinta loams, 8 to 35 percent Ground Water Resources .................................. 42 slopes .......................................................... 73 Seismic Activity .................................................. 42 Alder Series ....................................................... 74 Climate............................................................... 43 60C—Alder clay loam, 2 to 8 percent Formation and Classification of the Soils .......... 53 slopes .......................................................... 74 Formation of the Soils ........................................ 53 360E—Alder, stony-Cabba complex, 15 to 45 Classification of the Soils ................................... 54 percent slopes ............................................. 75 Soil Series and Detailed Map Units .................... 61 60D—Alder-Cabba complex, 8 to 25 percent Abor Series ........................................................ 62 slopes .......................................................... 75 721E—Abor-Rock outcrop complex, 15 to 45 Alona Series ...................................................... 76 percent slopes ............................................. 63 37B—Alona silty clay loam, 0 to 4 percent Absarokee Series .............................................. 63 slopes .......................................................... 77 869D—Absarokee-Tolbert complex, 4 to 15 Amesha Series .................................................. 77 percent slopes ............................................. 64 232C—Amesha cobbly loam, 2 to 8 percent 869E—Absarokee-Tolbert-Rock outcrop slopes .......................................................... 78 complex, 15 to 45 percent slopes................ 64 32B—Amesha loam, 0 to 4 percent slopes ....... 78 769D—Absarokee-Work-Tolbert complex, 32C—Amesha loam, 4 to 8 percent slopes ....... 78 4 to 15 percent slopes ................................. 65 32D—Amesha loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes ..... 79 Absarook Series ................................................ 66 32E—Amesha-Trimad complex, 15 to 45 668D—Absarook-Farnuf-Tolbert complex, percent slopes ............................................. 79 4 to 15 percent slopes ................................. 66 32F—Amesha loam, 35 to 60 percent slopes ... 80 470D—Absarook-Tolbert complex, 4 to 15 Amsterdam Series ............................................. 80 percent slopes ............................................. 67 53B—Amsterdam silt loam, 0 to 4 percent Accola Series ..................................................... 68 slopes .......................................................... 81 790E—Accola-Whitore, stony complex, 15 to 45 53C—Amsterdam silt loam, 4 to 8 percent percent slopes ............................................. 69 slopes .......................................................... 81 4 453B—Amsterdam-Quagle silt loams, 0 to 4 679F—Bangtail-Copenhaver complex, 35 to 60 percent slopes ............................................. 82 percent slopes ............................................. 96 453C—Amsterdam-Quagle silt loams, 4 to 8 679E—Bangtail-Copenhaver complex, 8 to 25 percent slopes ............................................. 82 percent slopes ............................................. 96 453D—Amsterdam-Brodyk silt loams, 8 to 15 879E—Bangtail-Copenhaver-Adel complex, percent slopes ............................................. 83 15 to 35 percent slopes ............................... 97 Anceney Series.................................................. 83 979E—Bangtail-Doby-Redlodge complex, 155F—Anceney cobbly loam, 15 to 60 percent 4 to 45 percent slopes ................................. 97 slopes .......................................................... 84 693F—Bangtail-Timberlin complex, 35 to 60 255D—Anceney cobbly loam, 8 to 15 percent percent slopes, stony .................................. 98 slopes .......................................................... 84 494F—Bangtail-Timberlin complex, moist, 755F—Anceney-Trimad-Meagher complex, 15 to 35 to 60 percent slopes, stony .................... 98 60 percent slopes ........................................ 85 693E—Bangtail-Timberlin, stony complex, Arcette Series .................................................... 85 15 to 45 percent slopes ............................... 99 695E—Arcette extremely bouldery sandy loam, 494E—Bangtail-Timberlin, stony complex, 15 to 35 percent slopes ............................... 86 moist 15 to 45 percent slopes ..................... 99 Attewan Series ................................................... 86 Barbarela Series .............................................. 100 33B—Attewan clay loam, 0 to 4 percent 782E—Barbarela-Poin,
Recommended publications
  • Canyon Ferry Reservoir Camping Regulations and Information

    Canyon Ferry Reservoir Camping Regulations and Information

    Canyon Ferry Reservoir Camping Regulations and Information Welcome to Canyon Ferry Recreation Area. The Bureau of Reclamation invites you to come and experience the abundance of wildlife and fishing opportunities available on your public lands around Canyon Ferry Reservoir. There are many recreation areas around the reservoir which include overnight campgrounds, day use areas, and group use shelters. To enhance your enjoyment and the enjoyment of others, campground regulations have been established through 43 CFR Part 423. Remember to be safe and enjoy your stay. Finding a Reservations for camping and group use shelters are now available. Reservations may be made at www.recreation.gov or by calling the toll-free reservation line at1-877-444-6777 (10:00 AM Campsite - 10:00 PM MST). Reservations can be made up to six months prior to visit. Campsites unreserved are available on a first-come,first-serve for the unreserved date(s). Walk in campsites or campsites unreserved are available first-come, first-served basis and cannot be reserved. Camping is allowed in designated campsites only. To declare occupancy of a walk in campsite, you must have a tent, camper or camp trailer in the campsite. Within 30 minutes of choosing a campsite, fill out a fee envelope and deposit it in the fee tube. Place the completed envelope receipt in the clip on the numbered site post. Pay only for the nights you know you will be camping. No refunds are available. You must not attempt to reserve a campsite for future use by placing equipment or other items on the campsite, or by personal appearance, without camping on and paying the required fees for that campsite daily.
  • Geology of Part of the Townsend Valley Broadwater and Jefferson

    Geology of Part of the Townsend Valley Broadwater and Jefferson

    Geology of Part of the Townsend Valley Broadwater and Jefferson » Counties,x Montana GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1042-N CONTRIBUTIONS TO ECONOMIC GEOLOGY GEOLOGY OF PART OF THE TOWNSEND VALLEY BROADWATER AND JEFFERSON COUNTIES, MONTANA By V. L. FREEMAN, E. T. RUPPEL, and M. R. KLEPPER ABSTRACT The Townsend Valley, a broad intermontane basin in west-central Montana, extends from Toston to Canyon Ferry. The area described in this report includes that part of the valley west of longitude 111° 30' W. and south of latitude 46° 30' N. and the low hills west and south of the valley. The Missouri River enters the area near Townsend and flows northward through the northern half of the area. Three perennial tributaries and a number of intermittent streams flow across the area and into the river from the west. The hilly parts of the area are underlain mainly by folded sedimentary rocks ranging in age from Precambrian to Cretaceous. The broad pediment in the southwestern part is underlain mainly by folded andesitic volcanic rocks of Upper Cretaceous age and a relatively thin sequence of gently deformed tuffaceous rocks of Tertiary age. The remainder of the area is underlain by a thick sequence of Tertiary tuffaceous rocks that is partly blanketed by late Tertiary and Quater­ nary unconsolidated deposits. Two units of Precambrian age, 13 of Paleozoic age, 7 of Mesozoic age, and several of Cenozoic tuffaceous rock and gravel were mapped. Rocks of the Belt series of Precambrian age comprise a thick sequence of silt- stone, sandstone, shale, and subordinate limestone divisible into the Greyson shale, the Spokane shale, and the basal part of the Empire shale, which was mapped with the underlying Spokane shale.
  • Fall 2016 Golden Eagle Migration Survey Big Belt Mountains, Montana

    Fall 2016 Golden Eagle Migration Survey Big Belt Mountains, Montana

    1 Fall 2016 Golden Eagle Migration S urvey Big Belt Mountains, Montana Photo by Ronan Dugan Montana Audubon, Helena, Montana March 2017 2 Fall 2016 Golden Eagle Migration Survey Big Belt Mountains, Montana Report submitted to: Helena - Lewis & Clark National Forest ATTN: Denise Pengeroth, Forest Biologist 3425 Skyway Drive, Helena, MT 59602 Report prepared by: Jeff Grayum, Ronan Dugan, & Steve Hoffman Counts conducted by: Ronan Dugan & Jeff Grayum Project coordinated by : Montana Audubon, Inc. Project Coordinator: Steve Hoffman P.O. Box 595, Helena, MT 59624 (406) 443 - 3949 March 2017 3 Table of Contents List of Tables ................................ ................................ ................................ .............................. 3 List of Figures ................................ ................................ ................................ ............................. 4 Introduction ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ 5 Study Site ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 6 Methods ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 8 Results and Discussion ................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 9 Observ ation Effort and Weather Summary ...............................
  • GEOLOGY and OIL and GAS PROSPECTS of the HUNTLEY FIELD, Montanj

    GEOLOGY and OIL and GAS PROSPECTS of the HUNTLEY FIELD, Montanj

    GEOLOGY AND OIL AND GAS PROSPECTS OF THE HUNTLEY FIELD, MONTANj By E. T. HANCOCK. INTRODUCTION. The Huntley field is in Yellowstone and Big Horn counties, south- central Montana, and embraces an area of about 650 square miles, part of which lies northwest and part southeast of Yellowstone River. The field has railroad facilities that are exceptionally good for this general region, being traversed by the main lines of the Northern Pacific and the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy railroads. These roads furnish excellent shipping facilities at Huntley, Warden, Ballantine, Pompeys Pillar, and other points. Acknowledgments. In presenting this report the writer desires to express his thanks to David White for valuable suggestions and criticisms, to T. W. Stanton and F. H. Knowlton for the identifica­ tion of fossils, and to C. E. Dobbins for assistance in the detailed mapping. He also wishes to call attention to the public service rendered by oil and gas operators who have furnished records of deep borings and by individuals who have contributed in various ways to the success of the investigation. Earlier investigations. The Huntley field is in reality an ex­ tension of the Lake Basin field, which was mapped by the writer during the summer of 1916.1 The geologic investigation of the region including the Lake Basin and Huntley fields began with the Northern Transcontinental Survey of 1882. Prior to that time geologists had described certain struc­ tural features and the stratigraphic succession at points closely ad­ jacent to these fields, such as Judith Gap, the canyon of the North Fork of the- Musselshell, and the Bridger Range, but almost noth­ ing had been written concerning the geology of the area herein de­ scribed.
  • Compilation of Reported Sapphire Occurrences in Montana

    Compilation of Reported Sapphire Occurrences in Montana

    Report of Investigation 23 Compilation of Reported Sapphire Occurrences in Montana Richard B. Berg 2015 Cover photo by Richard Berg. Sapphires (very pale green and colorless) concentrated by panning. The small red grains are garnets, commonly found with sapphires in western Montana, and the black sand is mainly magnetite. Compilation of Reported Sapphire Occurrences, RI 23 Compilation of Reported Sapphire Occurrences in Montana Richard B. Berg Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology MBMG Report of Investigation 23 2015 i Compilation of Reported Sapphire Occurrences, RI 23 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................................................................1 Descriptions of Occurrences ..................................................................................................7 Selected Bibliography of Articles on Montana Sapphires ................................................... 75 General Montana ............................................................................................................75 Yogo ................................................................................................................................ 75 Southwestern Montana Alluvial Deposits........................................................................ 76 Specifi cally Rock Creek sapphire district ........................................................................ 76 Specifi cally Dry Cottonwood Creek deposit and the Butte area ....................................
  • Wheatland Statement of Infrastructure Deficiency

    Wheatland Statement of Infrastructure Deficiency

    Statement Of Infrastructure Deficiency in the Industrial and Commercial area Of the Wheatland Census Designated Place (CDP) Broadwater County Figure 1. Wheatland Area of Broadwater County Wheatland Targeted Economic Development District Introduction TEDD Draft property Boundary On October 8th of 2018, the Montana Business Assistance Connection, on behalf of Broadwater 22 County entered into a contract with Community 7a Development Services of Montana to assist the 8a County in the proposed creation of a Targeted 9a Economic Development District (TEDD) in the Wheatland industrial and commercial area of the County. The first step in establishing a TEDD is to conduct a review of infrastructure deficiencies within the area proposed for inclusion in a TEDD. 21 6a The documentation of such deficiencies, within a 2a 3a 4a municipality (defined as a county, city or town or 1a consolidated city-county government), in accordance with state law, provides the necessary 8 20 foundation upon which a local government may 7 5a establish a TEDD to foster secondary, value-adding 6 19 5 4 18 economic development. 2 3 9 1 10 12 14 16 11 13 15 The Wheatland industrial and commercial area, 17 13a comprised of nearly 1,000 acres, is generally 12a 10a 11a 15a located along US Highway 287, just north of the 14a Interstate 90 – Highway 287 intersection (Figure 2). It includes the Wheat Montana Bakery and the proposed site of Bridger Brewing, both value- Figure 2 Wheatland Industrial and Commercial Area (draft adding businesses. The creation of a TEDD will map – red lines (does not include orange lines)) enable Broadwater County to encourage the retention, expansion and recruitment of these enterprises, as well as complimentary and compatible value-adding businesses, which will contribute to the overall economic well-being of the County.
  • Livingston Equestrian Ranch 39 Soaring Eagle Drive Livingston, Montana

    Livingston Equestrian Ranch 39 Soaring Eagle Drive Livingston, Montana

    Livingston Equestrian Ranch 39 Soaring Eagle Drive Livingston, Montana The Ranch Brokers | (307) 690-5425 | 610 S Hwy 93 | Hamilton, MT 59840 | www.theranchbrokers.com | [email protected] 1 LOCATION The Livingston Equestrian Ranch is located 4 miles northwest of Livingston, 35 miles east of Bozeman, 90 miles west of Billings, and 90 miles north of Yellowstone National Park. It has a view of three mountain ranges: the Absorkas to the Southeast, the Crazies to the East, and the Bridgers to the Northwest, all a part of the Rocky Mountains. The town of Livingston is one of the finest towns that Montana has to offer for western flair and country charm. Livingston has great dining, excellent shops and stores; it has several art galleries, historical buildings and several special events year round and is only 35 miles to the Bozeman Gallatin International Airport which has numerous flights from Delta, Big Sky, Frontier and many other airlines. Bozeman is home to Montana State University, rich with cultural events and several restaurants, stores, shopping plazas and keeping in tune with the Montana Flavor. The property is only 90 miles from the North Entrance of Yellowstone Park in Gardner, Montana. LOCALE Livingston is the original entrance to Yellowstone National Park, and it was here that rail passengers on the old Northern Pacific Railroad changed trains to catch the Park Branch Line to Yellowstone Park. Looking down Livingston’s Main Street, the historic, Western atmosphere of this frontier town remains intact in many of the city’s buildings. Over 436 buildings have been placed on the National Historic Register and walking maps are available at the Chamber of Commerce.
  • Yellowstone National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Scoping

    Yellowstone National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Scoping

    Geologic Resource Evaluation Scoping Summary Yellowstone National Park This document summarizes the results of a geologic resource evaluation scoping session that was held at Yellowstone National Park on May 16–17, 2005. The NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD) organized this scoping session in order to view and discuss the park’s geologic resources, address the status of geologic maps and digitizing, and assess resource management issues and needs. In addition to GRD staff, participants included park staff and cooperators from the U.S. Geological Survey and Colorado State University (table 1). Table 1. Participants of Yellowstone’s GRE Scoping Session Name Affiliation Phone E-Mail Bob Volcanologist, USGS–Menlo Park 650-329-5201 [email protected] Christiansen Geologist/GRE Program GIS Lead, NPS Tim Connors 303-969-2093 [email protected] Geologic Resources Division Data Stewardship Coordinator, Greater Rob Daley 406-994-4124 [email protected] Yellowstone Network Supervisory Geologist, Yellowstone Hank Heasler 307-344-2441 [email protected] National Park Geologist, NPS Geologic Resources Bruce Heise 303-969-2017 [email protected] Division Cheryl Geologist, Yellowstone National Park 307-344-2208 [email protected] Jaworowski Katie Geologist/Senior Research Associate, 970-586-7243 [email protected] KellerLynn Colorado State University Branch Chief, NPS Geologic Resources Carol McCoy 303-969-2096 [email protected] Division Ken Pierce Surficial Geologist, USGS–Bozeman 406-994-5085 [email protected] Supervisory GIS Specialist, Yellowstone Anne Rodman 307-344-7381 [email protected] National Park Shannon GIS Specialist, Yellowstone National Park 307-344-7381 [email protected] Savage Monday, May 16, involved a welcome to Yellowstone National Park and an introduction to the Geologic Resource Evaluation (GRE) Program, including status of reports and digital maps.
  • High Elevation Cultural Use of the Big Belt Mountains: a Possible Mountain Tradition Connection

    High Elevation Cultural Use of the Big Belt Mountains: a Possible Mountain Tradition Connection

    St. Cloud State University theRepository at St. Cloud State Culminating Projects in Cultural Resource Management Department of Anthropology 5-2020 High Elevation Cultural Use of the Big Belt Mountains: A Possible Mountain Tradition Connection Arian Randall Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/crm_etds Recommended Citation Randall, Arian, "High Elevation Cultural Use of the Big Belt Mountains: A Possible Mountain Tradition Connection" (2020). Culminating Projects in Cultural Resource Management. 34. https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/crm_etds/34 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Anthropology at theRepository at St. Cloud State. It has been accepted for inclusion in Culminating Projects in Cultural Resource Management by an authorized administrator of theRepository at St. Cloud State. For more information, please contact [email protected]. High Elevation Cultural Use of the Big Belt Mountains: A Possible Mountain Tradition Connection by Arian L. Randall A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of St. Cloud State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Cultural Resource Management, Archaeology May 6, 2020 Thesis Committee: Mark Muñiz, Chairperson Rob Mann Lauri Travis 2 Abstract The Sundog site (24LC2289) was first discovered in 2013 during a field school survey with Carroll College and the Helena-Lewis & Clark National Forest. This archaeological site is located at an elevation of 6,400ft above sea-level in the Northern Big Belt Mountains in Montana. The Sundog Site is a multi- component site with occupations from the Late Paleoindian period to the Late Prehistoric period. This site is significant due to its intact cultural deposits in a high-altitude park, in an elevational range that currently has a data gap.
  • Conservation in Yellowstone National Park Final Report on the COVER Wolverine Tracks in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem

    Conservation in Yellowstone National Park Final Report on the COVER Wolverine Tracks in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem

    Wolverine Conservation in Yellowstone National Park Final Report ON THE COVER Wolverine tracks in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Photo by Jason Wilmot. Wolverine Conservation in Yellowstone National Park Final Report Authors John Squires Kerry Murphy US Forest Service US Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station Jackson Ranger District 800 East Beckwith Avenue PO Box 25 Missoula, Montana 59801 Jackson, Wyoming 83001 [email protected] [email protected] (formerly Yellowstone Center for Resources, With contributions from Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming) Robert M. Inman Wildlife Conservation Society Jason Wilmot Wolverine Program Field Office Northern Rockies Conservation Cooperative 222 East Main Street PO Box 2705 Lone Elk 3B Jackson, Wyoming 83001 Ennis, Montana 59729 [email protected] [email protected] Jeff Copeland Mark L. Packila US Forest Service Wildlife Conservation Society Rocky Mountain Research Station Wolverine Program Field Office 800 East Beckwith Avenue 222 East Main Street Missoula, Montana 59801 Lone Elk 3B [email protected] Ennis, Montana 59729 [email protected] Dan Tyers US Forest Service Doug McWhirter Gardiner Ranger District Wyoming Game and Fish Regional Office PO Box 5 2820 State Highway 120 Gardiner, Montana 59030 Cody, Wyoming 82414 [email protected] National Park Service Yellowstone National Park Yellowstone Center for Resources Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming YCR-2011-02 March 2011 Suggested citation: Murphy, K., J. Wilmot, J. Copeland, D. Tyers, J. Squires, R. M. Inman, M. L. Packila, D. McWhirter. 2011. Wolverine conservation in Yellowstone National Park: Final report. YCR-2011-02. National Park Service, Yellowstone National Park, Yellowstone Center for Resources, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming.
  • Autobiography of Red Cloud War Leader of the Oglalas 1St Edition Pdf, Epub, Ebook

    Autobiography of Red Cloud War Leader of the Oglalas 1St Edition Pdf, Epub, Ebook

    AUTOBIOGRAPHY OF RED CLOUD WAR LEADER OF THE OGLALAS 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK R Eli Paul | 9780917298509 | | | | | Autobiography of Red Cloud War Leader of the Oglalas 1st edition PDF Book Told by the Gros Ventres of the near proximity of the Sioux, the Ree villagers had set up an ambush. Stock photo. Allen wrote them out in his own decorous prose and in the third person, rather than the autobiographical first. Here, for the first time in print is Red Cloud's 'as-told-to' autobiography in which he shares the story of his early years. Thanks for telling us about the problem. Charles Wesley Allen ,. Average rating 3. There was great rejoicing when he entered his own village, for it was supposed that he had been killed. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. Most of Red Cloud's story has been published 'third hand'. About this product. He is best known for his success in confrontations with the U. When he was around 5 years old, Red Cloud lost his father. Ben rated it really liked it Apr 10, Red Cloud's autobiography is just a glimmer, it's just so so so bittersweet. At the foot of that mountain is our village; there is where the women are. The Sioux had decided to make a rush and stampede the herd and, if an opportunity presented itself, shoot a struggling Ree or two and escape with their booty. Be the first to ask a question about Autobiography of Red Cloud. Paperback and kindle versions are available for purchase on amazon.
  • Horse Thief Trail Ranch 680 Acres with a Log Home and Barn - Livingston, MT!

    Horse Thief Trail Ranch 680 Acres with a Log Home and Barn - Livingston, MT!

    Horse Thief Trail Ranch 680 Acres with a Log Home and Barn - Livingston, MT! The Ranch Brokers | (307) 690-5425 | 610 S Hwy 93 | Hamilton, MT 59840 | www.theranchbrokers.com | [email protected] 1 LOCATION Located just 10 miles north of Livingston, Montana and 45 miles from Bozeman, Montana. Air Service Available: Gallatin Field Airport services several major airlines including Alaska, Allegiant, Delta, Frontier, Horizon, United and US Airways. For convenience, it offers many direct flights to Seattle/Tacoma, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Las Vegas, Salt Lake City, Denver, Phoenix, Minneapolis, Chicago and Atlanta, making it easily accessible from all over the country. LOCALE The general area is nearly surrounded by public land with over 970,000 acres of wilderness and nearly 2,000,000 acres of National Forest land with approximately 3,000,000 acres of Yellowstone National Park nearby. Access to a trail network extending for hundreds of miles in all directions for wildlife photography, hiking or horseback riding is just minutes away. Livingston, with a population of approximately 7,500, is just 7 miles away and supplies most major shopping needs with supermarkets, auto dealerships, equipment suppliers, retail stores, and hospital. Bozeman, has a population of 30,000, approximately 26 miles away, offers excellent commercial airline connections and is home to Montana State University. It is the cultural center of South-central Montana. HISTORY OF AREA Park County is the original gateway to Yellowstone National Park. The Yellowstone River flows south to north through the county - turning east at Livingston. The county is rich with history and legend.