<<

Karlsen Lillian 1 In case of life-limiting illness Dale, Karl Yngvar 2 Winsjansen, Bente 3 4 Lindseth, Gunnel Driller, Bardo 5

Research group; care and treatment of critically ill and dying patients, Møre og Hospital Trust What is most (HMR), university college. 1 The Centre for Health Innovation, 2 Faculty of Health Sciences and Social Care, ­important for you? 3 Cancer coordination, Fræna and municipalities, Elnesvågen and Eide, 4 Cancer coordination, Kristiansund municipality, ­Kristiansund N, Norway 5  Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust (HMR), Cancer ­department, Ålesund, Norway

To get relief of pain and suffering 54%* BACKGROUND: Research suggests that there is lack of knowledge and mostly negative perceptions ­towards palliative care in the public. An aging popu­ lation and it’s associated increase in the number of palliative patients urges us to explore the public’s ­understanding of the concept of palliative care. This is important to inform policymakers and to target edu­ cational strategies. Resulting public education needs to facilitate regional and cultural characteristics as Positive view of life 24% well as challenges that may be associated with demo­ graphic details.

AIM: To explore approaches of the public towards a palliative disease and check if the respondents’ Secure that family and ­priorities are associated with gender, age and level of education.

­friends are not anxious METHODS: A paper survey with closed questions was sent to a sample of the public by random ­distribution or distressed 15% among employees in the eight municipalities in ­Romsdal, Norway (n=530). A question about what is most important in case of serious illness, like cancer, with limited life expectancy included four main topics; view of life, symptom management, practical support and relation to family and friends. We asked the ­participants to choose their highest priority. Descrip­ tive statistical analysis was used for demographic data Getting practical and preferences, while Chi-square test was applied for issues solved 7% association analyses.

DEMOGRAFIC DATA (n = 300, response rate 57%)

AGE 18–30 years (n=21)

59–80 years 31–44 years (n=78) 7 (n=75) 26 25

42 45–58 years 54%* 24% 15% 7% (n=126) *significantly more important for ­people from 59 to 80 years (p<0.05) EDUCATION Primary School (n=9) High School (n=42) 3 CONCLUSION: A sample of the public in Norway, especially in ­older 14 age, value relief of pain and suffering as most important for them in case of serious life-limiting illness. Identifying and reflecting the ­public’s

­current perception and expectation towards palliative care is a key 83 College/ factor for educational strategies to empower individuals and to involve University (n=249) communities in future palliative care.

GENDER

Centre for Health Innovation Molde University College

69 % 31 % (n=207) (n=93) Centre for Development of ­Institutional and Home Møre og Romsdal care ­services Hospital Trust (HMR) Correspondence: Bardo Driller; [email protected], 004741381513