DOCSLIB.ORG

Future Army 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Future Army 2020 House of Commons Defence Committee Future Army 2020 Ninth Report of Session 2013–14 Volume I Volume I: Report, together with formal minutes and oral evidence Written evidence is contained in Volume II, available on the Committee website at www.parliament.uk/defcom Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 29 January 2014 HC 576 [Incorporating HC 803-i, Session 2012–13] Published on 6 March 2014 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £17.50 Future Army 2020 1 The Defence Committee The Defence Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Ministry of Defence and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon James Arbuthnot MP (Conservative, North East Hampshire) (Chair) Mr Julian Brazier MP (Conservative, Canterbury) Mr James Gray MP (Conservative, North Wiltshire) Rt Hon Jeffrey M. Donaldson MP (Democratic Unionist, Lagan Valley) Mr Dai Havard MP (Labour, Merthyr Tydfil and Rhymney) Adam Holloway MP (Conservative, Gravesham) Mrs Madeleine Moon MP (Labour, Bridgend) Sir Bob Russell MP (Liberal Democrat, Colchester) Bob Stewart MP (Conservative, Beckenham) Ms Gisela Stuart MP (Labour, Birmingham, Edgbaston) Derek Twigg MP (Labour, Halton) John Woodcock MP (Labour/Co-op, Barrow and Furness) The following Members were also members of the Committee during this inquiry. Thomas Docherty MP (Labour, Dunfermline and West Fife) Penny Mordaunt MP (Conservative, Portsmouth North) Sandra Osborne MP (Labour, Ayr, Carrick and Cumnock) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the internet at www.parliament.uk/parliament.uk/defcom. The Reports of the Committee, the formal minutes relating to that report, oral evidence taken and some or all written evidence are available in a printed volume. Additional written evidence may be published on the internet only. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are James Rhys (Clerk), Dougie Wands (Second Clerk), Karen Jackson (Audit Adviser), Ian Thomson (Committee Specialist), Christine Randall (Senior Committee Assistant), Rowena Macdonald and Carolyn Bowes (Committee Assistants), and Sumati Sowamber (Committee Support Assistant). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Defence Committee, House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 5857; the Committee’s email address is [email protected]. Media inquiries should be addressed to Alex Paterson on 020 7219 1589. 2 Future Army 2020 Contents Report Page Conclusions and recommendations 5 1 Introduction 13 Background 13 Timeline 13 Our inquiry 14 2 The Army 2020 plan 16 SDSR to Army 2020 16 Redundancy scheme 18 Strategic rationale of Army 2020 18 Role of the National Security Council 19 Army 2020 structure 20 Army 2020 plans 22 Testing and experimentation of Army 2020 23 Army 2020: financial drivers 24 “Fighting Power” 26 “Critical mass” of the Army 26 Defence Planning Assumptions 29 Expeditionary warfare 30 Joint working with the other Services 32 3 Implementation of Army 2020 33 Recruitment of Reserves 33 Relationship between the reduction in Regulars and the increase in Reservists 34 Reservist recruitment challenge 35 Recruitment and Target Data 38 Army recruitment contract 39 Reserves White Paper 41 Defence Reform Bill 43 Recognition for employers 43 Response from employers 44 Role of Reservists 46 Formed units and sub-units of Reservists and partnering with Regular units 48 Specialist Reserves 50 Ex-Regular Reserves 51 Role of Reservists in reconnecting the Armed Forces and the public 53 Cost and budget for Reservists 54 Recruitment age 55 Basing and Germany 57 Withdrawal from Germany 58 SDSR 2015 and beyond 60 Future Army 2020 3 4 Conclusion 62 Formal Minutes 63 Witnesses 64 List of written evidence 65 List of Reports from the Committee in Session 2013–14 66 Future Army 2020 5 Conclusions and recommendations Introduction 1. At the beginning of our Report, we wish to pay tribute to Army personnel, including those who have left the Services, for their bravery, dedication to duty and their contribution to the nation’s security. This has been an uncertain and worrying time for the Armed Forces as they undergo major changes to their structure and role while continuing to undertake operations in Afghanistan and other parts of the world. We also recognise the valuable role that their families play in supporting them as they carry out their duties. (Paragraph 6) The Army 2020 plan 2. We are surprised that such a radical change to the Army’s structure, reflecting a reduction of 12,000 personnel from that announced in SDSR 2010, was not discussed at the National Security Council (NSC). Even if the overall strategic vision had not changed, as the Government claims, the military ways and means of that strategy were considerably altered under Army 2020. We are firmly of the view that the NSC should have considered the Army 2020 plan. We recommend that the NSC should be involved in the evolution and development of Future Force 2020 in the run-up to the next SDSR in 2015. (Paragraph 15) 3. We have received no definitive evidence of an active experimentation programme in the development and implementation of Army 2020. Furthermore we note with concern that the Chief of the General Staff’s update on the implementation of Army 2020, published in July 2013, provided no detail on experimentation. The MoD should set out in more detail, with specific examples, how the plans for Army 2020 were, and are, being tested and challenged. (Paragraph 26) 4. We note that the Secretary of State for Defence accepts that Army 2020 was designed to fit a financial envelope. We are concerned that this consideration took primacy over the country’s abilities to respond to the threats, risks and uncertainties contained in the National Security Strategy. We were also concerned to hear that it was the Ministry of Defence’s Permanent Secretary who told the Chief of the General Staff the future size of the Army under the Army 2020 plan. We call on the MoD to explain the apparent lack of consultation and involvement of the Chief of the General Staff in the decision-making process that has affected his Service so fundamentally. (Paragraph 32) 5. In its response to this Report, we recommend that the MoD provide us with an assessment of how the Army 2020 plans will affect the “Fighting Power” of the Army providing comparable assessments of both current fighting power and projected fighting power following the completion of the Army 2020 plans. (Paragraph 34) 6. We agree with the Chief of the General Staff’s assessment that the security threats that the UK will face in future are uncertain. We remain to be convinced that the Army 2020 plan represents a fully thought-through and tested concept which will 6 Future Army 2020 allow the Army to counter emerging and uncertain threats and develop a contingent capability to deal with unforeseen circumstances. The MoD needs to justify how the conclusion was reached that the Army 2020 plan of 82,000 Regulars and 30,000 Reserves represented the best way of countering these threats. We ask the MoD to clarify if the proposals were fully considered by the Defence Board before the decision was made. (Paragraph 41) 7. We repeat our previous recommendation that the Government should further develop a concept of “critical mass” for the Armed Forces. We note that this is a concept not only used by the Army General Staff, but also one that the new Chief of the Defence Staff used in a recent speech. The development of a concept of “critical mass” for the Armed Forces, coupled with an assessment of the Army 2020 plan against the MoD’s “Fighting Power” doctrine, would enable a much better informed understanding of whether Army 2020 will enable the Army to fulfil its obligations and how it will contribute to Future Force 2020. (Paragraph 42) 8. We note the acknowledgement by senior Army officers that the continuing operation in Afghanistan and the current high level of change in the Army will compromise its ability to respond to unexpected events to some degree. We also note that one of the drivers for the Army 2020 plan was the recognition that the Army could not match in resource-terms the five Multi-Role Brigade enduring operation envisaged in the Defence Planning Assumptions. In an ever changing world, with uncertain and ever changing threats, and continuing uncertainty about the resources available, we are concerned that the Defence Planning Assumptions are adequate to ensure the UK’s national security. In its response to our Report, the MoD should explain what account was taken of the possibility of changes to the Defence Planning Assumptions during the development of Army 2020 and how it has ensured that there is sufficient flexibility in the plan and resources available to meet any such changes. The MoD must ensure that this is taken into account as part of the work on the 2015 SDSR and that contingency plans are in place to deal urgently with this eventuality. (Paragraph 48) 9. Despite the current lack of public appetite, we consider it to be a question of when, not if, UK Armed Forces will have to undertake an expeditionary operation in the future. In this context, it is essential that the Army maintains its ability to undertake such operations at short notice.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unlocking NATO's Amphibious Potential
    November 2020 Perspective EXPERT INSIGHTS ON A TIMELY POLICY ISSUE J.D. WILLIAMS, GENE GERMANOVICH, STEPHEN WEBBER, GABRIELLE TARINI Unlocking NATO’s Amphibious Potential Lessons from the Past, Insights for the Future orth Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) members maintain amphibious capabilities that provide versatile and responsive forces for crisis response and national defense. These forces are routinely employed in maritime Nsecurity, noncombatant evacuation operations (NEO), counterterrorism, stability operations, and other missions. In addition to U.S. Marine Corps (USMC) and U.S. Navy forces, the Alliance’s amphibious forces include large ships and associated landing forces from five nations: France, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, and the United Kingdom (UK). Each of these European allies—soon to be joined by Turkey—can conduct brigade-level operations, and smaller elements typically are held at high readiness for immediate response.1 These forces have been busy. Recent exercises and operations have spanned the littorals of West and North Africa, the Levant, the Gulf of Aden and Arabian Sea, the Caribbean, and the Pacific. Given NATO’s ongoing concerns over Russia’s military posture and malign behavior, allies with amphibious capabilities have also been exploring how these forces could contribute to deterrence or, if needed, be employed as part of a C O R P O R A T I O N combined and joint force in a conflict against a highly some respects, NATO’s ongoing efforts harken back to the capable nation-state. Since 2018, NATO’s headquarters Cold War, when NATO’s amphibious forces routinely exer- and various commands have undertaken initiatives and cised in the Mediterranean and North Atlantic as part of a convened working groups to advance the political intent broader strategy to deter Soviet aggression.
    [Show full text]
  • Delivering Security in a Changing World Future Capabilities
    Delivering Security in a Changing World Future Capabilities 1 Delivering Security in a Changing World Future Capabilities Presented to Parliament by The Secretary of State for Defence By Command of Her Majesty July 2004 £7.00 Cm 6269 Chapter 1 Introduction 2 Chapter 2 Force Structure Changes 5 Chapter 3 Organisation and Efficiency 11 Chapter 4 Conclusions 13 Annex Determining the Force Structure 14 © Crown Copyright 2004 The text in this document (excluding the Royal Arms and departmental logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the document specified. Any enquiries relating to the copyright in this document should be addressed to The Licensing Division, HMSO, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich, NR3 1BQ. Fax: 01603 723000 or e-mail: licensing@cabinet-office.x.gsi.gov.uk Foreword by the Secretary of State for Defence the Right Honourable Geoff Hoon MP In the Defence White Paper of last December I set out the need to defend against the principal security challenges of the future: international terrorism, the proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, and weak and failing states. Our need in the future is for flexible and adaptable armed forces properly supported to carry out the most likely expeditionary operations. To create a more sustainable and affordable force structure which better meets these operational requirements we have secured additional resources: the 2004 Spending Review allocated £3.7 billion to defence across the Spending Review period, which represents an average real terms increase of 1.4% a year.
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSFORMING the BRITISH ARMY an Update
    TRANSFORMING THE BRITISH ARMY An Update © Crown copyright July 2013 Images Army Picture Desk, Army Headquarters Designed by Design Studio ADR002930 | TRANSFORMING THE BRITISH ARMY 2013 TRANSFORMING THE BRITISH ARMY 2013 | 1 Contents Foreword 1 Army 2020 Background 2 The Army 2020 Design 3 Formation Basing and Names 4 The Reaction Force 6 The Adaptable Force 8 Force Troops Command 10 Transition to new Structures 14 Training 15 Personnel 18 Defence Engagement 21 Firm Base 22 Support to Homeland Resilience 23 Equipment 24 Reserves 26 Army Communication Strategic Themes 28 | TRANSFORMING THE BRITISH ARMY 2013 TRANSFORMING THE BRITISH ARMY 2013 | 1 Foreword General Sir Peter Wall GCB CBE ADC Gen Chief of the General Staff We have made significant progress in refining the detail of Army 2020 since it was announced in July 2012. It is worth taking stock of what has been achieved so far, and ensuring that our direction of travel continues to be understood by the Army. This comprehensive update achieves this purpose well and should be read widely. I wish to highlight four particular points: • Our success in establishing Defence Engagement as a core Defence output. Not only will this enable us to make a crucial contribution to conflict prevention, but it will enhance our contingent capability by developing our understanding. It will also give the Adaptable Force a challenging focus in addition to enduring operations and homeland resilience. • We must be clear that our capacity to influence overseas is founded upon our credibility as a war-fighting Army, capable of projecting force anywhere in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Monday Volume 550 17 September 2012 No. 45 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday 17 September 2012 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2012 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 619 17 SEPTEMBER 2012 620 development should not be approved in the green belt, House of Commons and boundaries should be altered only in exceptional circumstances. Monday 17 September 2012 Simon Danczuk: As we all know, Rochdale is surrounded by some of the most beautiful countryside in the United The House met at half-past Two o’clock Kingdom—[Interruption.] Can the Secretary of State assure me and residents of Rochdale that we will not PRAYERS have to swap some of our green-belt land for house building? [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] Mr Pickles: For a moment I thought the hon. Gentleman was going to put that to the vote; I would have been on BUSINESS BEFORE QUESTIONS his side. The Planning Inspectorate looked at Rochdale QUEEN’S SPEECH (ANSWER TO ADDRESS) metropolitan borough council’s core strategy, and as the hon. Gentleman will know, consultation ends next The VICE-CHAMBERLAIN OF THE HOUSEHOLD reported to the House, That Her Majesty, having been attended Monday. It was extended to allow consideration of the with its Address of 17th May, was pleased to receive the proposed release of 55 hectares of green-belt land on same very graciously and give the following Answer: the South Heywood development, but that has now been excluded from the core strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation in Iraq, Our Diplomatic Efforts Were Concentrated in the UN Process
    OPERATIONS IN IRAQ First Reflections IRAQ PUBLISHED JULY 2003 Produced by Director General Corporate Communication Design by Directorate of Corporate Communications DCCS (Media) London IRAQ FIRST REFLECTIONS REPORT Contents Foreword 2 Chapter 1 - Policy Background to the Operation 3 Chapter 2 - Planning and Preparation 4 Chapter 3 - The Campaign 10 Chapter 4 - Equipment Capability & Logistics 22 Chapter 5 - People 28 Chapter 6 - Processes 32 Chapter 7 - After the Conflict 34 Annex A - Military Campaign Objectives 39 Annex B - Chronology 41 Annex C - Deployed Forces and Statistics 43 1 Foreword by the Secretary of State for Defence On 20 March 2003 a US-led coalition, with a substantial contribution from UK forces, began military operations against the Saddam Hussein regime in Iraq. Just 4 weeks later, the regime was removed and most of Iraq was under coalition control. The success of the military campaign owed much to the determination and professionalism of the coalition’s Armed Forces and the civilians who supported them. I regret that, during the course of combat operations and subsequently, a number of Service personnel lost their lives. Their sacrifice will not be forgotten. The UK is playing a full part in the re-building of Iraq through the establishment of conditions for a stable and law-abiding Iraqi government. This process will not be easy after years of repression and neglect by a brutal regime. Our Armed Forces are performing a vital and dangerous role by contributing to the creation of a secure environment so that normal life can be resumed, and by working in support of humanitarian organisations to help the Iraqi people.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Doctrine Note 1/16: Air Manoeuvre
    Joint Doctrine Note 1/16 Air Manoeuvre Development, Concepts and Doctrine Centre Joint Doctrine Note 1/16 Air Manoeuvre Joint Doctrine Note (JDN) 1/16, dated September 2016, is promulgated as directed by the Chiefs of Staff Head Doctrine Conditions of release 1. This information is Crown copyright. The Ministry of Defence (MOD) exclusively owns the intellectual property rights for this publication. You are not to forward, reprint, copy, distribute, reproduce, store in a retrieval system, or transmit its information outside the MOD without VCDS’ permission. 2. This information may be subject to privately owned rights. JDN 1/16 i Authorisation The Development, Concepts and Doctrine Centre (DCDC) is responsible for publishing strategic trends, joint concepts and doctrine. If you wish to quote our publications as reference material in other work, you should confirm with our editors whether the particular publication and amendment state remains authoritative. We welcome your comments on factual accuracy or amendment proposals. Please send them to: The Development, Concepts and Doctrine Centre MOD Shrivenham, SWINDON, Wiltshire, SN6 8RF Telephone number: 01793 31 4216/4217/4220 Military Network: 96161 4216/4217/4220 E-mail: [email protected] All images, or otherwise stated are: © Crown copyright/MOD 2016. Distribution The distribution of Joint Doctrine Note (JDN) 1/16 is managed by the Forms and Publications Section, LCSLS Headquarters and Operations Centre, C16 Site, Ploughley Road, Arncott, Bicester, OX25 1LP. All of our other publications, including a regularly updated DCDC Publications Disk, can also be demanded from the LCSLS Operations Centre. LCSLS Help Desk: 01869 256197 Military Network: 94240 2197 Our publications are available to view and download on the Defence Intranet (RLI) at: http://defenceintranet.diif.r.mil.uk/Organisations/Orgs/JFC/Organisations/Orgs/ DCDC This publication is also available on the Internet at: www.gov.uk/mod/dcdc iiii JDN 1/16 Preface Purpose 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Companies Signing
    The International Code of Conduct for Private Security Service Providers Signatory Companies Complete List as of 1 August 2013 – Version with Company Details 1. 1Naval One Signed by: Alex Raptis, Operations Manager Date of becoming Signatory Company: 1 May 2013 (by letter) Headquarters: Panama, Panama City Website: www.naval1.com 1Naval One SA., provides specialized professional global security for the maritime industry. Our company offers services that cover the fields of training, consulting and maritime security. Our people are former members of elite and SF units of the armed forces with extensive operational experience in the maritime environment. Naval One S.A., operates to the highest international standards of the industry and in compliance of national and international laws. 2. 2D Security Signed by: Devrim Poyraz, Director Date of becoming Signatory Company: 1 February 2013 (by letter) Headquarters: Turkey, Istanbul Website: www.2d.com.tr We as 2D Security have been operating since 2001 on several different security fields such as ballistics cabin protection and consultancy. With our current company form, now we are entering sea security field. We just hired over 30 special trained navy seals which have employed by the Turkish Navy in the past. These personnel are ready to execute every mission that is needed in sea security. Most of our services will be assisting vessels passing through Suez Canal and Indian Ocean area protecting against piracy. Being part of your family would take us to the next level. One good thing about crew is having different missions in different countries as part of the NATO forces, this means having experience dealing with natives of those countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Regarding the Appointment of All Honorary Colonels in the British Army
    Army Secretariat Army Headquarters IDL 24 Blenheim Building Marlborough Lines Andover Hampshire, SP11 8HJ United Kingdom Ref: FOI2019/13423/13/04 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.army.mod.uk XXXXXX 09 January 2020 xxxxxxxxxxxxx Dear XXXXXX, Thank you for your letter of 06 December in which you requested the following information: “a. A current list as at 6 December 2019 of all the Honorary Colonels in the British Army b. An explanation as to how these appointments are advertised to ensure a wide diverse group as possible have an opportunity to be considered for these appointments c. An explanation as to how individuals are then selected for an appointment as an Honorary Colonel” I am treating your correspondence as a request for information under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) 2000. A search for the information has now been completed within the Ministry of Defence, and I can confirm that the information in scope of your request is held and is below. In response to first part of your request please find attached a list of Honorary Colonels in the British Army. Some of this information is exempt from release under section 40 (Personal Data) of the FOIA. Section 40(2) has been applied to some of the information to protect personal information as governed by the Data Protection Act 2018. Section 40 is an absolute exemption and there is therefore no requirement to consider the public interest in deciding to withhold the information. In response to second part of your request please note that appointments are selected by nominations after basic criteria is met.
    [Show full text]
  • National Recognition of Our Armed Forces
    Report of Inquiry into National Recognition of our Armed Forces Report to the Prime Minister by: Quentin Davies MP Bill Clark OBE Ministry of Defence Air Commodore Martin Sharp OBE MA RAF Report of Inquiry into National Recognition of our Armed Forces Report to the Prime Minister by: Quentin Davies MP Bill Clark OBE Ministry of Defence Air Commodore Martin Sharp OBE MA RAF May 2008 Foreword Rt Hon Gordon Brown MP One of the greatest privileges I’ve enjoyed since becoming Prime Minister has been to spend time with the extraordinarily skilled and dedicated men and women of our Armed Forces, and to visit them on the ground in Iraq and Afghanistan. Their courage, their service and their professionalism make an immeasurable contribution both to building peace and stability around the world and to protecting our nation here at home. The Government is acutely aware of the debt we owe our Armed Forces, and our gratitude for the work they do in the service of our country is reflected in our recent initiatives on pay, on tax-free bonuses, on housing and on health care, as well as in our decision to commission a Command Paper on conditions of service and quality of life, which we will be publishing this summer. But beyond these individual initiatives, important though they are, it is vital for our serving men and women, especially those engaged in difficult and dangerous overseas campaigns, to know that the whole of Britain understands and appreciates the work that they do in our name. I believe the British public are fully behind the men and women of our Armed Forces, and people want to do more to pay tribute to them.
    [Show full text]
  • Army Secretariat Army Headquarters IDL 24 Blenheim Building Marlborough Lines Andover Hampshire, SP11 8HJ United Kingdom
    Army Secretariat Army Headquarters IDL 24 Blenheim Building Marlborough Lines Andover Hampshire, SP11 8HJ United Kingdom Ref: Army/Sec/21/02/FOI2019/09324 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.army.mod.uk Mr Jason Lai request-596651- 1 October 2019 [email protected] Dear Mr Lai Thank you for your email of 12 August 2019 in which you requested the following information: With regards to the 1 August 2019 Field Army restructuring and Army 2020 Refine: 1. Where will be the new Rifle company for 3 PWRR be located and what is the name of the new Company 2. Can you re-confirm that there will be a new Rifle Company for the London Regiment and what its its [sic] name and location 3. Which Royal Engineer Regiments will move to 25th Close Support Engineer Group to support the Strike Brigades and which will remain as part of 12th Force Support Group under 8 Engineer Brigade? 4. Will 254 (Specialist Group Information Services) Signal Squadron and the Land Information Assurance group still be under the command of 15 Signal Regiment as it converts to support 12 Armoured Infantry Brigade 5. Please list the battalions/regiments that will remain under 38th (Irish) Brigade and 160th (Welsh) Brigade. 6. [Are] Headquarters North West and North East are merging together and does it mean HQ North East is separating from 4th Infantry Brigade? 7. Which higher formation does 6 CSE Battalion REME fall under or is it still OPCON 101 Logistic Brigade? 8. Which Light Cavalry regiment - The Light Dragoons, 1st The Queen's Dragoon Guards or the Royal Scot Dragoon Guards - will resubordinate to 6th UK Division and under with [sic] Brigade? I am treating your correspondence as a request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the Act).
    [Show full text]
  • 0048-As1 Iban Report on the Audit of the Financial
    NATO UNCLASSIFIED 29 June 2015 DOCUMENT C-M(2015)0048-AS1 IBAN REPORT ON THE AUDIT OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ALLIED COMMAND OPERATIONS FOR 2013 ACTION SHEET On 26 June 2015, under the silence procedure, the Council noted the IBAN report IBA-AR(2014)20 attached to C-M(2015)0048 and agreed the recommendations contained in the RPPB report, including its public release. (Signed) Alexander Vershbow Deputy Secretary General NOTE: This Action Sheet is part of, and shall be attached to C-M(2015)0048. NATO UNCLASSIFIED NHQD9364 NATO UNCLASSIFIED 22 June 2015 DOCUMENT C-M(2015)0048 Silence Procedure ends: 26 Jun 2015 16:00 IBAN REPORT ON THE AUDIT OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ALLIED COMMAND OPERATIONS FOR 2013 Note by the Deputy Secretary General 1. I attach the International Board of Auditors for NATO (IBAN) report on the audit of the financial statements of Allied Command Operations (ACO) for the year ended 31 December 2013. 2. The IBAN issued a qualified opinion on the ACO financial statements for the year 2013 as well as a qualified opinion on compliance for the financial year 2013. The IBAN report, although showing improvements by ACO in many areas, also illustrates that many of the weaknesses identified in previous audit reports have not yet been fully corrected. While some progress has been made, particularly in clearing outstanding observations from previous years, the positive impact expected with the adoption of the NATO Accounting Framework has not yet materialised. 3. The IBAN report has been reviewed by the Resource Policy and Planning Board (RPPB), which has provided its own report with conclusions and recommendations to Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Formal Minutes
    House of Commons Defence Committee Formal Minutes Session 2013-14 Defence Committee: Formal Minutes 2013–14 The Defence Committee The Defence Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Ministry of Defence and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rory Stewart MP (Conservative, Penrith and The Border) (Chair) Mr Julian Brazier MP (Conservative, Canterbury) Rt Hon Jeffrey M. Donaldson MP (Democratic Unionist, Lagan Valley) Mr James Gray MP (Conservative, North Wiltshire) Mr Dai Havard MP (Labour, Merthyr Tydfil and Rhymney) Mr Adam Holloway MP (Conservative, Gravesham) Mrs Madeleine Moon MP (Labour, Bridgend) Sir Bob Russell (Liberal Democrat, Colchester) Bob Stewart MP (Conservative, Beckenham) Ms Gisela Stuart MP (Labour, Birmingham, Edgbaston) Derek Twigg MP, (Labour, Halton) John Woodcock MP (Lab/Co-op, Barrow and Furness) The following were also Members of the Committee during the Parliament Rt Hon James Arbuthnot MP (Conservative, North East Hampshire) (former Chair) Thomas Docherty MP (Labour, Dunfermline and West Fife) Mr John Glen MP (Conservative, Salisbury). Mr Mike Hancock MP (Liberal Democrat, Portsmouth South) Mr David Hamilton MP (Labour, Midlothian) Penny Mordaunt MP (Conservative, Portsmouth North) Sandra Osborne MP (Labour, Ayr, Carrick and Cumnock) Alison Seabeck MP (Labour, Moor View) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]