DOCSLIB.ORG

Walter Houser Brattain B

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Walter Houser Brattain B Brattain et.al. Bipolar TransistorInvention -1- This chapter is a reprint of the internet address: http://www.geocities.com/bioelectrochemistry/brattain.htm (Spring 2002) Walter Houser Brattain b. Feb. 10, 1902, Amoy, China d. Oct. 13, 1987, Seattle, Wash., U.S. American scientist who, along with John Bardeen and William B. Shockley, won the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1956 for his investigation of the properties of semiconductors-materials of which transistors are made--and for the development of the transistor. The transistor replaced the bulkier vacuum tube for many uses and was the forerunner of microminiature electronic parts. His father, Ross, and mother, Ottilie, married just after they'd graduated from Whitman College in Walla Walla, Washington. Ross got a job teaching science and math in China, and Walter Houser Brattain was born on February 10, 1902 in Amoy. They didn't stay abroad long: by 1903, the Brattains were back in Washington. Walter spent most of his youth on a large cattle ranch just south of the Canadian border. When he wasn't doing school work, Walter had little time for anything besides helping out on the ranch. He was a cowboy. In the fall of 1920, Brattain entered Whitman College and received a B.S. degree there in 1924. He claimed he majored in physics and math because they were the only subjects he was good at. Brattain attended college at a turning point in American science, when physics was being transformed. Older students would have been expected to travel to Europe for a first- class physics education, but Brattain was in the first wave of those who could do just as well in the US. Encouraged by his professor Benjamin Brown to continue his studies, Brattain went on to the University of Oregon for his Masters (received M.A. in 1926) and to the University of Minnesota for a Ph.D. (awarded the Ph.D. in 1929). Brattain's first job out of graduate school was at the National Bureau of Standards as a radio engineer, but after a year there he wanted to get back to physics. At an American Physical Society meeting, he was about to ask his thesis advisor, John Tate, for help. But before he said anything, Tate introduced him to Joseph Becker of Bell Labs. "By the way, Becker is looking for a man," he said, and Brattain quickly responded, "I'm interested!" Becker asked for only one qualification: he wanted to make sure that Brattain was the kind of guy who'd stand up to his superiors when necessary. Brattain, raised on a working ranch with a rifle in his saddle bags to shoot rattlesnakes, laughed. On August 1, 1929, Brattain moved to Becker's lab in New York City. In 1935 he married the late Dr. Keren (Gilmore) Brattain; they had one son, William Gilmore Brattain. modeling toolkits Brattain.doc | 25.03.02 Brattain et.al. Bipolar TransistorInvention -2- Brattain at crystal pulling apparatus Working with Becker, Brattain spent most of his time studying copper-oxide rectifiers. The pair thought they might be able to make an amplifier by putting a tiny metal grid in the middle of the device, similar to the design of vacuum tubes. A few years later, William Shockley came to him with a similar idea. Neither contraption actually worked. Working with crystals eventually paid off. On March 6, 1940, Brattain and Becker were called into the office of Bell's President, Mervin Kelly. There they saw Russell Ohl 's mysterious crystal that increased voltage whenever light was flashed on it. It turned out to be a very crude p-n junction, but no one knew it at the time. Brattain, who at first thought it was a practical joke, gave an off-the-cuff explanation that electrical current was being generated at a barrier inside. That theory turned out to be true. Kelly was suitably impressed Brattain spent the World War II years working on ways to detect submarines, and then returned to Bell Labs to find Kelly was reorganizing the researchers. Brattain was assigned to a new solid state group with Stanley Morgan and Bill Shockley at the head. He wrote about it in January 1964: "A list came around on my desk of a new group that was being organized to do research in the solid state. The heads of this group were to be joint: S.O. Morgan and William Shockley. I read through this list and thought about it a minute and read through it quickly again, and I said, 'By golly! There isn't an s.o.b. in the group. This is some group.' Then after a minute I had a second thought that maybe I was the s.o.b. in the group." John Bardeen, a friend of Brattain's brother Robert, joined the group as well. Bardeen's skill was in theory, while Brattain's was in experimenting. The two men soon learned to work together beautifully — Bardeen would watch Brattain conduct an experiment, and then offer hypotheses about the results. The chief field of his research has been the surface properties of solids. His early work was concerned with thermionic emission and adsorbed layers on tungsten. He continued on into the field of rectification and photo-effects at semiconductor surfaces, beginning with a study of rectification at the surface of cuprous oxide. This work was followed by similar studies of silicon. Dr. Brattain's chief contributions to solid state physics have been the discovery of the photo-effect at the free surface of a semiconductor and work leading to a better understanding of the surface properties of semiconductors. The close relationship between Brattain and Bardeen paid off in what has become known as the "Miracle Month." For four weeks the two men came up with one great idea after another. Over the month they built several devices — each one a little better than the last — and it all came together on Tuesday, December 16. Brattain sat down at their latest attempt to build an modeling toolkits Brattain.doc | 25.03.02 Brattain et.al. Bipolar TransistorInvention -3- amplifier. He turned on the voltage and for once everything seemed to work just right. "This thing's got gain!" Brattain said to no one in particular. That meant amplification. John Bardeen, William Shockley, Walter Brattain 1956 [Left to right] "Later in life, Brattain would always say to people who really knew him well, that he really hated that photo." – Michael Riordan, author Crystal Fire After the point-contact transistor was built, a clash of personalities got the better of what had been a well-tuned research group. The fight was over just how much credit Shockley would receive. He was the team leader, but he worked on his own research at home and left Bardeen and Brattain alone. A famous company publicity photo of the three men shows how skewed the relationships were: Shockley sat at center stage in front of the microscope as if he had done the critical experiments. It was Brattain's laboratory bench and Brattain's equipment, but Brattain stood behind his boss, as if Shockley had really done the work. In fact, management at Bell Labs insisted that Shockley appear in every publicity picture. He was the head of the group and deserved to be there, the lab management felt. But they kept his name off the patent. That did not make Brattain or Bardeen feel any better about Shockley. The transistor, more than any other single development, made possible the marriage of computers and communication. Three AT&T Labs researchers -- John Bardeen, William Shockley, and Walter Brattain -- shared the Nobel Prize for their 1947 invention of this tiny, reliable, electronic component. In the years following its creation, the transistor gradually replaced the bulky, fragile vacuum tubes that had been used to amplify and switch signals. The transistor -- and the eventual creation of integrated circuits that contained millions of transistors -- served as the foundation for the development of modern electronics. modeling toolkits Brattain.doc | 25.03.02 Brattain et.al. Bipolar TransistorInvention -4- A close-up of the first transistor Transistors were first publicly announced as a small item on an inside page of the New York Times. The picture shows Walter Brattain with his parents in the lab after the invention of the transistor was announced. At 7 AM, Thursday, November 1, 1956, Brattain was at home when he got a phone call from a reporter. He had been awarded the Nobel Prize for the invention of the transistor. He was soon swamped by the media. Later that morning he attended a meeting in the labs' Murray Hill auditorium. As he walked into the room, everyone spontaneously stood up and began to clap. It brought tears to his eyes. Later he wrote: "What happened there is a matter of record, except possibly the extreme emotion that one feels on receiving the acclamation of one's colleagues and friends of years, knowing full well that one could not have accomplished the work he had done without them, and that it was really only a stroke of luck that it was he and not one of them." modeling toolkits Brattain.doc | 25.03.02 Brattain et.al. Bipolar TransistorInvention -5- Brattain receives Nobel Prize Dr. Brattain received the honorary Doctor of Science degree from Portland University in 1952, from Whitman College and Union College in 1955, and from the University of Minnesota in 1957. In 1952 he was awarded the Stuart Ballantine Medal of the Franklin Institute, and in 1955 the John Scott Medal.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Invention of the Transistor
    The invention of the transistor Michael Riordan Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Cruz, California 95064 Lillian Hoddeson Department of History, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801 Conyers Herring Department of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305 [S0034-6861(99)00302-5] Arguably the most important invention of the past standing of solid-state physics. We conclude with an century, the transistor is often cited as the exemplar of analysis of the impact of this breakthrough upon the how scientific research can lead to useful commercial discipline itself. products. Emerging in 1947 from a Bell Telephone Laboratories program of basic research on the physics I. PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATIONS of solids, it began to replace vacuum tubes in the 1950s and eventually spawned the integrated circuit and The quantum theory of solids was fairly well estab- microprocessor—the heart of a semiconductor industry lished by the mid-1930s, when semiconductors began to now generating annual sales of more than $150 billion. be of interest to industrial scientists seeking solid-state These solid-state electronic devices are what have put alternatives to vacuum-tube amplifiers and electrome- computers in our laps and on desktops and permitted chanical relays. Based on the work of Felix Bloch, Ru- them to communicate with each other over telephone dolf Peierls, and Alan Wilson, there was an established networks around the globe. The transistor has aptly understanding of the band structure of electron energies been called the ‘‘nerve cell’’ of the Information Age. in ideal crystals (Hoddeson, Baym, and Eckert, 1987; Actually the history of this invention is far more in- Hoddeson et al., 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • A Pictorial History of Nuclear Instrumentation
    A Pictorial History of Nuclear Instrumentation Ranjan Kumar Bhowmik Inter University Accelerator Centre (Retd) Dawn of Nuclear Instrumentation End of 19th Century Wilhelm Röntgen (1845-1923) (1895) W. Roentgen observes florescence in barium platinocyanide due to invisible rays from a gas discharge tube. Names them X- rays First medical X-ray Henry Becquerel (1852-1908) (1896) H. Bacquerel detects that uranium salts spontaneously emit a penetrating radiation that can blacken photographic films Independent of chemical composition Pierre Curie (1859-1906) Marie Curie (1867-1934) (1987) Pierre & Marie Curie found that both uranium and thorium emit radiation that can ionise gases – detected by electroscopes. Coin the name ‘Radioactivity’ to describe this natural process Early Instrumentation Equipment used for these path-breaking discoveries were developed much earlier : • Optical fluorescence (1560) Bernardino de Sahagún • Thermo-luminescence (17th Century) • Gold Leaf Electroscope (1787) Abraham Bennet • Photographic Emulsion (1839) Louis Daguerre Early instruments were sensitive to radiation dose only, could not detect individual radiation Spinthariscope (1903) • Spinthariscope was invented by William Crookes. It is made of a ZnS screen viewed by an eyepiece • Scintillation produced by an incident a-particle can be seen as faint light flashes • Rutherford’s famous a-scattering experiment proved the existence a ‘point-like’ nucleus inside the atom Geiger Counter (1908) First instrument to detect individual a-particles electronically was developed by Geiger. Chamber filled with CO2 at 2-5 cm of mercury Central wire at ground potential connected to an electrometer. Successive ‘kicks’ in the electrometer indicated the passage of a charged particle; response time ~1 sec Geiger Muller Counter (1928) An improved design (1912) had a string Major improvement was electrometer for detection.
    [Show full text]
  • Famous Physicists Himansu Sekhar Fatesingh
    Fun Quiz FAMOUS PHYSICISTS HIMANSU SEKHAR FATESINGH 1. The first woman to 6. He first succeeded in receive the Nobel Prize in producing the nuclear physics was chain reaction. a. Maria G. Mayer a. Otto Hahn b. Irene Curie b. Fritz Strassmann c. Marie Curie c. Robert Oppenheimer d. Lise Meitner d. Enrico Fermi 2. Who first suggested electron 7. The credit for discovering shells around the nucleus? electron microscope is often a. Ernest Rutherford attributed to b. Neils Bohr a. H. Germer c. Erwin Schrödinger b. Ernst Ruska d. Wolfgang Pauli c. George P. Thomson d. Clinton J. Davisson 8. The wave theory of light was 3. He first measured negative first proposed by charge on an electron. a. Christiaan Huygens a. J. J. Thomson b. Isaac Newton b. Clinton Davisson c. Hermann Helmholtz c. Louis de Broglie d. Augustin Fresnel d. Robert A. Millikan 9. He was the first scientist 4. The existence of quarks was to find proof of Einstein’s first suggested by theory of relativity a. Max Planck a. Edwin Hubble b. Sheldon Glasgow b. George Gamow c. Murray Gell-Mann c. S. Chandrasekhar d. Albert Einstein d. Arthur Eddington 10. The credit for development of the cyclotron 5. The phenomenon of goes to: superconductivity was a. Carl Anderson b. Donald Glaser discovered by c. Ernest O. Lawrence d. Charles Wilson a. Heike Kamerlingh Onnes b. Alex Muller c. Brian D. Josephson 11. Who first proposed the use of absolute scale d. John Bardeen of Temperature? a. Anders Celsius b. Lord Kelvin c. Rudolf Clausius d.
    [Show full text]
  • Emerging Physics a Fresh Approach to Viewing the Complexity of the Universe
    GETTY IMAGES Emerging physics A fresh approach to viewing the complexity of the Universe. A Different Universe: Reinventing (an analogy that Robert Laughlin draws from with those of life,the biomolecules,for which Physics from the Bottom Down Christina Rossetti’s poem Who Has Seen the he has considerable admiration.Then we hear by Robert Laughlin Wind?). Our identity and perceptions are his own ideas on biology, which will not be Basic Books: 2005. 304 pp. $26, £19.99 all the collective behaviour of ‘ghosts’, who to everyone’s taste but are certainly thought- Philip Anderson borrow their reality from each other. provoking. Finally, his view of complexity Laughlin gives the reader a quick tour science surprised and pleased me with its I should make my interests clear right at the through much of physics (without a single relative benevolence. start. For many years I have thought that a equation). There is a slight emphasis on the Despite the above fulsome praise, this is book such as this should be written, and quantum theory of condensed matter, in so not by any means a perfect book, even for its have been urged to write it myself. I didn’t far as it explains such things as computers purpose.Laughlin is not reliably careful with do so, and couldn’t possibly have written (with a sceptical side glance at quantum facts, whether scientific or historical. For one as suited as this is for its target audience. computation), the properties of ordinary example, it has rhetorical value to give his A Different Universe is a book about what metals, and the like.
    [Show full text]
  • The General Working of Solar Cells and the Correlation Between
    The general working of solar cells and the correlation between diffuseness and temperature, irradiance and spectral shape Thomas Kalkman & Max Verweg Under supervision of M. Futscher and B. Ehrler 2 week Bachelor Research Project June 28, 2017 Physics and Astronomy, University of Amsterdam [email protected], [email protected] Abstract main parameter for efficiency would bring clarification and demands for further experiments to verify this parameter. The efficiency of solar cells is mostly measured under standard test conditions. In reality, the temperature and Theory sunlight is not always the same. In The Netherlands there is on average only 1650 hours of sunshine per year[2], the Solar cells are made of different layers of materials. They rest of the daytime per year is without direct sunlight ra- have a protective glass plate, thin films as moisture barriers diating the solar cells. The light captured is diffuse. In this and the actual solar cells which convert the energy. work we discuss the basics of how solar cells work and we investigate the correlation between diffuseness of the sunlight and temperature, irradiation and spectral shape. We find correlations due to weather conditions. Further- more we verify correlations between efficiency and tem- perature, and efficiency and irradiation. Introduction Figure 1: Schematic representation of a silicon solar cell. Since the discovery of the photovoltaic effect - explaining The blue layer is an anti reflective and protective layer, the how electricity can be converted from sunlight - by Alexan- grey layers are the cathode and anode, the yellow layers are dre Edmond Becquerel in 1839, and the invention of solar the silicon semiconductor.
    [Show full text]
  • INDUSTRIAL STRENGTH by MICHAEL RIORDAN
    THE INDUSTRIAL STRENGTH by MICHAEL RIORDAN ORE THAN A DECADE before J. J. Thomson discovered the elec- tron, Thomas Edison stumbled across a curious effect, patented Mit, and quickly forgot about it. Testing various carbon filaments for electric light bulbs in 1883, he noticed a tiny current trickling in a single di- rection across a partially evacuated tube into which he had inserted a metal plate. Two decades later, British entrepreneur John Ambrose Fleming applied this effect to invent the “oscillation valve,” or vacuum diode—a two-termi- nal device that converts alternating current into direct. In the early 1900s such rectifiers served as critical elements in radio receivers, converting radio waves into the direct current signals needed to drive earphones. In 1906 the American inventor Lee de Forest happened to insert another elec- trode into one of these valves. To his delight, he discovered he could influ- ence the current flowing through this contraption by changing the voltage on this third electrode. The first vacuum-tube amplifier, it served initially as an improved rectifier. De Forest promptly dubbed his triode the audion and ap- plied for a patent. Much of the rest of his life would be spent in forming a se- ries of shaky companies to exploit this invention—and in an endless series of legal disputes over the rights to its use. These pioneers of electronics understood only vaguely—if at all—that individual subatomic particles were streaming through their devices. For them, electricity was still the fluid (or fluids) that the classical electrodynamicists of the nineteenth century thought to be related to stresses and disturbances in the luminiferous æther.
    [Show full text]
  • William Bradford Shockley
    William Bradford Shockley Born February 13, 1910, London, UK- died 1989, Santa Clara, Calif.; with Walter Brattain and John Bardeen, inventor of the transistor in 1947, the 1956 Nobel laureate. Education: BS, physics, California Institute of Technology, 1932; PhD, physics, MIT, 1936. Professional Experience: Bell Telephone Laboratories: member, Technical Staff, 1936- 1942 and 1945-1954, director, Transistor Physics Research Facility, 1954; director of research, Antisubmarine Warfare Operations Research Group, US Navy, 1942-1944; founder, Shockley Semiconductor Laboratory, 1954-1989; Stanford University: lecturer, 1958-1963, Alexander M. Poniatoff Professor of Engineering Science and Applied Science, 1963-1975, professor emeritus, 1975-1989. Honors and Awards: Nobel Prize in physics,1 1956. Co-inventor of the transistor in 1947 with John Bardeen and Walter Brattian, Shockley participated in one of the most important discoveries of the century. They applied for a patent in 1948; this device was described as a germanium “transfer resistance” unit, from which the name “transistor” was derived. Shockley continued his research on the device to create the germanium junction transfer transistor, which was much more reliable than the first unit. From this start he founded Shockley Semiconductor Laboratories in Santa Clara Valley in 1954. After he received the Nobel Prize in 1956, disenchantment with Shockley's management style and his propensity for pure research led to the defection of the “Fairchild Eight” in 1957, and the deterioration of his company. His controversial views on genetics and his racist theories have shocked the society around him, but he has continued his research into “grave world problems.” QUOTATION “The only heritage I can leave to Billy is the feeling of power and joy of responsibility for setting the world right on something.” (Shockley's mother, about her 8-year-old son) BIBLIOGRAPHY Biographical 1 Jointly with John Bardeen and Walter H.
    [Show full text]
  • Communications-Mathematics and Applied Mathematics/Download/8110
    A Mathematician's Journey to the Edge of the Universe "The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing." ― Socrates Manjunath.R #16/1, 8th Main Road, Shivanagar, Rajajinagar, Bangalore560010, Karnataka, India *Corresponding Author Email: [email protected] *Website: http://www.myw3schools.com/ A Mathematician's Journey to the Edge of the Universe What’s the Ultimate Question? Since the dawn of the history of science from Copernicus (who took the details of Ptolemy, and found a way to look at the same construction from a slightly different perspective and discover that the Earth is not the center of the universe) and Galileo to the present, we (a hoard of talking monkeys who's consciousness is from a collection of connected neurons − hammering away on typewriters and by pure chance eventually ranging the values for the (fundamental) numbers that would allow the development of any form of intelligent life) have gazed at the stars and attempted to chart the heavens and still discovering the fundamental laws of nature often get asked: What is Dark Matter? ... What is Dark Energy? ... What Came Before the Big Bang? ... What's Inside a Black Hole? ... Will the universe continue expanding? Will it just stop or even begin to contract? Are We Alone? Beginning at Stonehenge and ending with the current crisis in String Theory, the story of this eternal question to uncover the mysteries of the universe describes a narrative that includes some of the greatest discoveries of all time and leading personalities, including Aristotle, Johannes Kepler, and Isaac Newton, and the rise to the modern era of Einstein, Eddington, and Hawking.
    [Show full text]
  • ELEC3221 Digital IC & Sytems Design Iain Mcnally Koushik Maharatna Basel Halak ELEC3221 / ELEC6241 Digital IC & Sytems D
    ELEC3221 ELEC3221 / ELEC6241- module merge for 2016/2017 Digital IC & Sytems Design Digital IC & Sytems Design SoC Design Techniques Iain McNally Iain McNally 10 lectures 10 lectures ≈ ≈ Koushik Maharatna Koushik Maharatna 12 lectures 12 lectures ≈ ≈ Basel Halak Basel Halak 12 lectures 12 lectures ≈ ≈ 1001 1001 ELEC3221 / ELEC6241 Digital IC & Sytems Design Assessment Digital IC & Sytems Design • SoC Design Techniques 10% Coursework L-Edit Gate Design (BIM) 90% Examination Iain McNally Books • 10 lectures ≈ Integrated Circuit Design Koushik Maharatna a.k.a. Principles of CMOS VLSI Design - A Circuits and Systems Perspective Neil Weste & David Harris 12 lectures ≈ Pearson, 2011 Basel Halak Digital System Design with SystemVerilog Mark Zwolinski 12 lectures ≈ Pearson Prentice-Hall, 2010 1001 1002 Digital IC & Sytems Design History Iain McNally 1947 First Transistor Integrated Circuit Design John Bardeen, Walter Brattain, and William Shockley (Bell Labs) Content • 1952 Integrated Circuits Proposed – Introduction Geoffrey Dummer (Royal Radar Establishment) - prototype failed... – Overview of Technologies 1958 First Integrated Circuit – Layout Jack Kilby (Texas Instruments) - Co-inventor – CMOS Processing 1959 First Planar Integrated Circuit – Design Rules and Abstraction Robert Noyce (Fairchild) - Co-inventor – Cell Design and Euler Paths – System Design using Standard Cells 1961 First Commercial ICs – Wider View Simple logic functions from TI and Fairchild Notes & Resources 1965 Moore’s Law • http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/bim/notes/icd Gordon Moore (Fairchild) observes the trends in integration. 1003 1004 History 1947 Point Contact Transistor Collector Emitter 1947 First Transistor John Bardeen, Walter Brattain, and William Shockley (Bell Labs) Base 1952 Integrated Circuits Proposed Geoffrey Dummer (Royal Radar Establishment) - prototype failed..
    [Show full text]
  • Report and Opinion 2016;8(6) 1
    Report and Opinion 2016;8(6) http://www.sciencepub.net/report Beyond Einstein and Newton: A Scientific Odyssey Through Creation, Higher Dimensions, And The Cosmos Manjunath R Independent Researcher #16/1, 8 Th Main Road, Shivanagar, Rajajinagar, Bangalore: 560010, Karnataka, India [email protected], [email protected] “There is nothing new to be discovered in physics now. All that remains is more and more precise measurement.” : Lord Kelvin Abstract: General public regards science as a beautiful truth. But it is absolutely-absolutely false. Science has fatal limitations. The whole the scientific community is ignorant about it. It is strange that scientists are not raising the issues. Science means truth, and scientists are proponents of the truth. But they are teaching incorrect ideas to children (upcoming scientists) in schools /colleges etc. One who will raise the issue will face unprecedented initial criticism. Anyone can read the book and find out the truth. It is open to everyone. [Manjunath R. Beyond Einstein and Newton: A Scientific Odyssey Through Creation, Higher Dimensions, And The Cosmos. Rep Opinion 2016;8(6):1-81]. ISSN 1553-9873 (print); ISSN 2375-7205 (online). http://www.sciencepub.net/report. 1. doi:10.7537/marsroj08061601. Keywords: Science; Cosmos; Equations; Dimensions; Creation; Big Bang. “But the creative principle resides in Subaltern notable – built on the work of the great mathematics. In a certain sense, therefore, I hold it astronomers Galileo Galilei, Nicolaus Copernicus true that pure thought can
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Cells Operation and Modeling
    Solar Cells Operation and Modeling Dragica Vasileska, ASU Gerhard Klimeck, Purdue Outline – Introduction to Solar Cells – Absorbing Solar Energy – Solar Cell Equations Solution • PV device characteristics • Important generation-recombination mechanisms • Analytical model • Numerical Solution • Shadowing • Photon recycling • Quantum efficiency for current collection • Simulation of Solar Cells with Silvaco Introduction to Solar Cells - Historical Developments - o 1839: Photovoltaic effect was first recognized by French physicist Alexandre-Edmond Becquerel. o 1883: First solar cell was built by Charles Fritts, who coated the semiconductor selenium with an extremely thin layer of gold to form the junctions (1% efficient). o 1946: Russell Ohl patented the modern solar cell o 1954: Modern age of solar power technology arrives - Bell Laboratories, experimenting with semiconductors, accidentally found that silicon doped with certain impurities was very sensitive to light. o The solar cell or photovoltaic cell fulfills two fundamental functions: o Photogeneration of charge carriers (electrons and holes) in a light- absorbing material o Separation of the charge carriers to a conductive contact to transmit electricity Introduction to Solar Cells - Solar Cells Types - • Homojunction Device - Single material altered so that one side is p-type and the other side is n-type. - p-n junction is located so that the maximum amount of light is absorbed near it. • Heterojunction Device - Junction is formed by contacting two different semiconductor. - Top layer - high bandgap selected for its transparency to light. - Bottom layer - low bandgap that readily absorbs light. • p-i-n and n-i-p Devices - A three-layer sandwich is created, - Contains a middle intrinsic layer between n-type layer and p-type layer.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Bifacial Pv System on Canary Islands' Energy
    IMPACT OF BIFACIAL PV SYSTEM ON CANARY ISLANDS’ ENERGY 4 DE SEPTIEMBRE DE 2018 MÁSTER DE ENERGÍAS RENOVABLES Universidad de La Laguna Alberto Mora Sánchez / Impact of Bifacial PV System on Canary Island’s Energy IMPACT OF BIFACIAL PV SYSTEM ON CANARY ISLANDS’ ENERGY Alberto Mora Sánchez, Máster de Energías Renovables, Universidad de La Laguna, Ricardo Guerrero Lemus, Departamento de Física e Instituto de Materiales y Nanotecnología, Universidad de La Laguna ABSTRACT This project proposes an investigation motivated by the interest in obtaining a better understanding of the role that the bifacial technology could play in a favorable environment such as the Canarias Islands. In order to develop a scientific knowledge about this technology and to be able to evaluate the functioning of a bifacial system with different configurations that can give important results and show that this type of installations could be fruitful in the near future as already foreseen in the reports of the International Technology Roadmap for Photovoltaic where they predict that will increase their shear in photovoltaics the next years. Bifacial Technology has the advantage of being able to use the back of the module to produce energy using diffuse and albedo radiations. During the project, the mini-modules will be manufactured and characterized, and then placed in out-door structures where measurements will be carried out. In addition, it will try to use the down shifter technique that improves the spectral response thanks to the displacement of wavelengths that are not absorbed by the cells. The main advantage of the bifacial modules is to take advantage of the albedo that reaches its rear side, so that, in this study different configurations will be studied in order to optimize the generation of energy for the specific environmental conditions of the location.
    [Show full text]