DOCSLIB.ORG

Report and Opinion 2016;8(6) 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report and Opinion 2016;8(6) 1 Report and Opinion 2016;8(6) http://www.sciencepub.net/report Beyond Einstein and Newton: A Scientific Odyssey Through Creation, Higher Dimensions, And The Cosmos Manjunath R Independent Researcher #16/1, 8 Th Main Road, Shivanagar, Rajajinagar, Bangalore: 560010, Karnataka, India [email protected], [email protected] “There is nothing new to be discovered in physics now. All that remains is more and more precise measurement.” : Lord Kelvin Abstract: General public regards science as a beautiful truth. But it is absolutely-absolutely false. Science has fatal limitations. The whole the scientific community is ignorant about it. It is strange that scientists are not raising the issues. Science means truth, and scientists are proponents of the truth. But they are teaching incorrect ideas to children (upcoming scientists) in schools /colleges etc. One who will raise the issue will face unprecedented initial criticism. Anyone can read the book and find out the truth. It is open to everyone. [Manjunath R. Beyond Einstein and Newton: A Scientific Odyssey Through Creation, Higher Dimensions, And The Cosmos. Rep Opinion 2016;8(6):1-81]. ISSN 1553-9873 (print); ISSN 2375-7205 (online). http://www.sciencepub.net/report. 1. doi:10.7537/marsroj08061601. Keywords: Science; Cosmos; Equations; Dimensions; Creation; Big Bang. “But the creative principle resides in Subaltern notable – built on the work of the great mathematics. In a certain sense, therefore, I hold it astronomers Galileo Galilei, Nicolaus Copernicus true that pure thought can grasp reality, as the ancients (who took the details of Ptolemy, and found a way to dreamed.” -- Albert Einstein look at the same construction from a slightly different A perspective and discover that the Earth is not the LAYMAN’S JOURNEY center of the universe) and Johannes Kepler – which TO THE FRONTIERS OF PHYSICS take us on a journey from the time when Aristotle and the world of that era believed that Earth was the center of the universe and supported on the back of a giant tortoise to our contemporary age when we know better − regards body of knowledge as painterly truth. Rather it is absolutely-absolutely false. The word “certainty” in the Game of Science is a misleading term. The “Through history of science, from Copernicus and Galileo to the our perceptions, universe shapes itself. present, is replete with examples that belie the charge Through of uncertainism in science. Despite the fact that our thoughts, the universe is delivering its science (which is guided by natural law and is testable glories. against the empirical world) has revolutionized every We are the medium through which the universe aspect of human life and greatly clarified our becomes conscious of its existence.” understanding of the world, it has weighty limitations and it’s a journey not a destination and the advance of Chapter 1 knowledge is an infinite progression towards a goal A Cosmic Mystery Begins that forever recedes. And it's our main ingredient for understanding − a means of accepting what we've learned, challenging what we (a hoard of talking monkeys who’s consciousness is from a collection of connected neurons − hammering away on typewriters and by pure chance eventually ranging the values for the (fundamental) numbers that would allow the development of any form of intelligent life) think, and knowing that in some of the things that we think, there may be something to modify and to change. We now have considerable empirical data and highly successful scientific interpretations that bear on the question of 1 Report and Opinion 2016;8(6) http://www.sciencepub.net/report certainty. The time has come to examine what those reciprocal of uncertainty.’ The very existence of data and models tell us about the validity of the certainty is a lot more baffled than it exists, even if we scientific hypothesis. begin from a point of thinking it’s pretty damn baffled in the first point. Moreover, the very expression “certainly proven” is a contradiction in terms. There’s nothing that is certainly proven. The deep core of science is the deep awareness that we have wrong ideas, we have misinterpretations. And the fact that we human beings − who are ourselves mere collections of fundamental particles in a truly elegant fashion — still facing with the question: “What is truth,” or rather “who is Truth?” — have been able to live with doubt and uncertainty. We think it's much more interesting to live not knowing than to have answers which might be false. Ever since the beginning of human civilization, After sleeping through a hundred million years in we have not been in a state of satisfaction to watch wisps, ashes and smoking gun we − the rational beings things as incoherent and unexplainable. While we developed from the Darwin’s principle of natural have been thinking whether the universe began at the selection (a mechanistic, causal account of how living big bang singularity and would come to an end either things came to look as if they had been designed for a at the big crunch singularity, we have converted at purpose) in terms of the genetic information carried in least a thousand joules of energy in the form of the DNA of our cells and how it got modified by thoughts. This has decreased the disorder of the human random mutations − have finally awakened our eyes brain by about few million units. Thus, in a sense, the on a cooled cinder, sparkling with color, bountiful evolution of human civilization in understanding the with life, reciting an African creation myth (: that in universe has established a small corner of the order in the beginning, there was only darkness, water, and the a human brain. However, the burning questions still great god Bumba. One day Bumba, in pain from a remain unresolved, which set the human race to keep stomach ache, vomited up the sun. The sun dried up away from such issues. Many early native postulates some of the water, leaving land. Still in pain, Bumba have fallen or are falling aside -- and there now vomited up the moon, the stars, and then some alternative substitutes. In short, while we do not have animals. The reptiles, mammals, and ultimately the an answer, we now have a whisper of the grandeur of human race) and rapidly moving on to big questions the problem. With our limited brains and tiny such as, if the big bang was perfectly symmetrical, and knowledge, we cannot hope to have a complete picture then we should expect equal amounts of matter and of unlimited speculating about the gigantic universe antimatter to be formed. In other words, if matter and we live in. antimatter can be made or destroyed only in matching amounts, and the laws of physics are exactly same for the both, then how can it be that the universe contains so much matter but so little antimatter? So why do we now see only matter except for the tiny amounts of antimatter that we make in the lab and observe in cosmic rays? Is that the original big bang was not perfectly symmetrical at all? We Humans, a curious species, are accustomed into an inquisition. The question is not ‘do we know everything from the triumph of the Higgs boson to the underlying discomfort of multiverses?’ or it is ‘do we know enough?’ But how perfectly we know about We understand the things we see things? For many people this might sound like a We don’t understand what we can’t startling claim. But scientific knowledge is often Cosmological Principle: transitory: some (but not all) unquestionably fraught The universe is the same everywhere. with misinterpretation. This is not a weakness but Homogeneous: strength, for our better understanding of the events The universe looks the same from every point. around us, and of our own existence. However, all that Isotropic: we can say how far we are from the truth, ‘the The universe looks the same in every direction. But WHY? 2 Report and Opinion 2016;8(6) http://www.sciencepub.net/report For lack of other theories, we forcibly adore the --Albert Einstein, in a Sept.26, 1947, letter to theories like the big bang, which posits that in the Georges Lema beginning of evolution all the observable galaxies and With many bizarre twists and turns, super strings every speck of energy in the universe was jammed into − a generalized extension of string theory which a very tiny mathematically indefinable entity called predicts that all matter consists of tiny vibrating the singularity (or the primeval atom named by the strings and the precise number of dimensions: ten. The Catholic priest Georges Lemaitre, who was the first to usual three dimensions of space − length, width, and investigate the origin of the universe that we now call breadth − and one of time are extended by six more the big bang). This extremely dense point exploded spatial dimensions − blinked into existence. Although with unimaginable force, creating matter and the mathematics of super strings is so complicated propelling it outward to make the billions of galaxies that, to date, no one even knows the exact equations of of our vast universe. It seems to be a good postulate the theory (we know only approximations to these that the anticipation of a mathematically indefinable equations, and even the approximate equations are so entity by a scientific theory implies that the theory has complicated that they as yet have been only partially ruled out. It would mean that the usual approach of solved) − The best choice we have at the moment is science of building a scientific model could anticipate the super strings, but no one has seen a superstring and that the universe must have had a beginning, but that it it has not been found to agree with experience and could not prognosticate how it had a beginning.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2019 in the Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU)
    THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER FACTS AND FIGURES 2020 2 The University 4 World ranking 6 Academic pedigree 8 World-class research CONTENTS 10 Students 12 Making a difference 14 Global challenges, Manchester solutions 16 Stellify 18 Graduate careers 20 Staff 22 Faculties and Schools 24 Alumni 26 Innovation 28 Widening participation UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER 30 Cultural institutions UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER 32 Income 34 Campus investment 36 At a glance 1 THE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER Our vision is to be recognised globally for the excellence of our people, research, learning and innovation, and for the benefits we bring to society and the environment. Our core goals and strategic themes Research and discovery Teaching and learning Social responsibility Our people, our values Innovation Civic engagement Global influence 2 3 WORLD RANKING The quality of our teaching and the impact of our research are the cornerstones of our success. We have risen from 78th in 2004* to 33rd – our highest ever place – in 2019 in the Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU). League table World ranking European ranking UK ranking 33 8 6 ARWU 33 8 6 WORLD EUROPE UK QS 27 8 6 Times Higher Education 55 16 8 *2004 ranking refers to the Victoria University of Manchester prior to the merger with UMIST. 4 5 ACADEMIC PEDIGREE 1906 1908 1915 1922 1922 We attract the highest-calibre researchers and teachers, with 25 Nobel Prize winners among J Thomson Ernest Rutherford William Archibald V Hill Niels Bohr Physics Chemistry Larence Bragg Physiology or Medicine Physics our current and former staff and students.
    [Show full text]
  • Franck-Hertz Experiment
    IIA2 Modul Atomic/Nuclear Physics Franck-Hertz Experiment This experiment by JAMES FRANCK and GUSTAV LUDWIG HERTZ from 1914 (Nobel Prize 1926) is one of the most impressive comparisons in the search for quantum theory: it shows a very simple arrangement in the existence of discrete stationary energy states of the electrons in the atoms. ÜÔ ÖÑÒØ Á Á¾ ¹ ÜÔ ÖÑÒØ This experiment by JAMES FRANCK and GUSTAV LUDWIG HERTZ from 1914 (Nobel Prize 1926) is one of the most impressive comparisons in the search for quantum theory: it shows a very simple arrangement in the existence of discrete stationary energy states of the electrons in the atoms. c AP, Department of Physics, University of Basel, September 2016 1.1 Preliminary Questions • Explain the FRANCK-HERTZ experiment in our own words. • What is the meaning of the unit eV and how is it defined? • Which experiment can verify the 1. excitation energy as well? • Why is an anode used in the tube? Why is the current not measured directly at the grid? 1.2 Theory 1.2.1 Light emission and absorption in the atom There has always been the question of the microscopic nature of matter, which is a key object of physical research. An important experimental approach in the "world of atoms "is the study of light absorption and emission of light from matter, that the accidental investigation of the spectral distribution of light absorbed or emitted by a particular substance. The strange phenomenon was observed (first from FRAUNHOFER with the spectrum of sunlight), and was unexplained until the beginning of this century when it finally appeared: • If light is a continuous spectrum (for example, incandescent light) through a gas of a particular type of atom, and subsequently , the spectrum is observed, it is found that the light is very special, atom dependent wavelengths have been absorbed by the gas and therefore, the spectrum is absent.
    [Show full text]
  • Isamu Akasaki(Professor at Meijo University
    Nanotechnology and Materials (FY2016 update) Meeting the challenge of "impossible" technology Succeeded in the practical implementation of blue light-emitting diode! Research in the unattainable territory that won the Nobel Prize The 2014 Nobel Physics Prize was presented to blue LED. The development of blue LED resulted in the three researchers, Professor Isamu Akasaki, Professor commercialization of much brighter and energy-saving Hiroshi Amano and Professor Shuji Nakamura for the white light, thus contributing to energy conservation invention of an efficient blue light-emitting diode (LED). in the world and an improvement of people's lives in Red LEDs and yellow-green LEDs were developed in the areas without sufficient electricity. In addition to their 1960s; however, practical implementation of blue LEDs use as light sources, blue LEDs are now being widely was so difficult that it was even said that "it would be applied in various fields such as information technology, impossible to realize blue LEDs by the end of the 20th transportation, medicine and agriculture. Additionally, century." Amid such a circumstance, Professor Akasaki, the technology to put gallium nitride into practical Professor Amano and Professor Nakamura worked on implementation developed by the three researchers is the high-quality single crystallization and the p-type expected to find various applications in the future, such doping of gallium nitride (GaN), both of which had been as an application in power devices that serve as electric given up by researchers around the world. Their efforts power converters in electric vehicles and smart grids, from the 1980s to the 1990s finally led to their success next-generation power distribution grids,.
    [Show full text]
  • Wave Nature of Matter: Made Easy (Lesson 3) Matter Behaving As a Wave? Ridiculous!
    Wave Nature of Matter: Made Easy (Lesson 3) Matter behaving as a wave? Ridiculous! Compiled by Dr. SuchandraChatterjee Associate Professor Department of Chemistry Surendranath College Remember? I showed you earlier how Einstein (in 1905) showed that the photoelectric effect could be understood if light were thought of as a stream of particles (photons) with energy equal to hν. I got my Nobel prize for that. Louis de Broglie (in 1923) If light can behave both as a wave and a particle, I wonder if a particle can also behave as a wave? Louis de Broglie I’ll try messing around with some of Einstein’s formulae and see what I can come up with. I can imagine a photon of light. If it had a “mass” of mp, then its momentum would be given by p = mpc where c is the speed of light. Now Einstein has a lovely formula that he discovered linking mass with energy (E = mc2) and he also used Planck’s formula E = hf. What if I put them equal to each other? mc2 = hf mc2 = hf So for my photon 2 mp = hfhf/c/c So if p = mpc = hfhf/c/c p = mpc = hf/chf/c Now using the wave equation, c = fλ (f = c/λ) So mpc = hc /λc /λc= h/λ λ = hp So you’re saying that a particle of momentum p has a wavelength equal to Planck’s constant divided by p?! Yes! λ = h/p It will be known as the de Broglie wavelength of the particle Confirmation of de Broglie’s ideas De Broglie didn’t have to wait long for his idea to be shown to be correct.
    [Show full text]
  • Harry Truman, the Atomic Bomb and the Apocalyptic Narrative
    Volume 5 | Issue 7 | Article ID 2479 | Jul 12, 2007 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus The Decision to Risk the Future: Harry Truman, the Atomic Bomb and the Apocalyptic Narrative Peter J. Kuznick The Decision to Risk the Future: Harry stressed that the future of mankind would be Truman, the Atomic Bomb and theshaped by how such bombs were used and Apocalyptic Narrative subsequently controlled or shared.[3] Truman recalled Stimson “gravely” expressing his Peter J. Kuznick uncertainty about whether the U.S. should ever use the bomb, “because he was afraid it was so I powerful that it could end up destroying the whole world.” Truman admitted that, listening In his personal narrative Atomic Quest, Nobel to Stimson and Groves and reading Groves’s Prize-winning physicist Arthur Holly Compton, accompanying memo, he “felt the same who directed atomic research at the University fear.”[4] of Chicago’s Metallurgical Laboratory during the Second World War, tells of receiving an urgent visit from J. Robert Oppenheimer while vacationing in Michigan during the summer of 1942. Oppenheimer and the brain trust he assembled had just calculated the possibility that an atomic explosion could ignite all the hydrogen in the oceans or the nitrogen in the atmosphere. If such a possibility existed, Compton concluded, “these bombs must never be made.” As Compton said, “Better to accept the slavery of the Nazis than to run a chance of drawing the final curtain on mankind.”[1] Certainly, any reasonable human being could be expected to respond similarly. Three years later, with Hitler dead and the Nazis defeated, President Harry Truman faced Truman and Byrnes en route to Potsdam, July a comparably weighty decision.
    [Show full text]
  • Atomic Physics & Quantum Effects
    KEY CONCEPTS ATOMIC PHYSICS & QUANTUM EFFECTS 1. PHOTONS & THE PHOTOELECTRIC EFFECT Max Planck explained blackbody radiation with his quantum hypothesis, which states that the energy of a thermal oscillator, Eosc, is not continuous, but instead is a discrete quantity given by the equation: Eosc = nhf n = 1, 2, 3,... where f is the frequency and h is a constant now known as Planck’s constant. Albert Einstein extended the idea by adding that all emitted radiation is quantized. He suggested that light is composed of discrete quanta, rather than of waves. According to his theory, each particle of light, known as a photon, has an energy E given by: E = hf Einstein’s theory helped him explain a phenomenon known as the photoelectric effect, in which a photon of light strikes a photosensitive material and causes an electron to be ejected from the material. A photocell constructed from photosensitive material can produce an electrical current when light shines on it. The kinetic energy, K, of a photoelectron displaced by a photon of energy, hf, is given by: K = hf - φ where the work function, φ, is the minimum energy needed to free the electron from the photosensitive material. No photoemission occurs if the frequency of the incident light falls below a certain cutoff frequency – or threshold frequency – given by: φ f0 = h Einstein's theory explained several aspects of the photoelectric effect that could not be explained by classical theory: • The kinetic energy of photoelectrons is dependent on the light’s frequency. • No photoemission occurs for light below a certain threshold frequency.
    [Show full text]
  • Famous Physicists Himansu Sekhar Fatesingh
    Fun Quiz FAMOUS PHYSICISTS HIMANSU SEKHAR FATESINGH 1. The first woman to 6. He first succeeded in receive the Nobel Prize in producing the nuclear physics was chain reaction. a. Maria G. Mayer a. Otto Hahn b. Irene Curie b. Fritz Strassmann c. Marie Curie c. Robert Oppenheimer d. Lise Meitner d. Enrico Fermi 2. Who first suggested electron 7. The credit for discovering shells around the nucleus? electron microscope is often a. Ernest Rutherford attributed to b. Neils Bohr a. H. Germer c. Erwin Schrödinger b. Ernst Ruska d. Wolfgang Pauli c. George P. Thomson d. Clinton J. Davisson 8. The wave theory of light was 3. He first measured negative first proposed by charge on an electron. a. Christiaan Huygens a. J. J. Thomson b. Isaac Newton b. Clinton Davisson c. Hermann Helmholtz c. Louis de Broglie d. Augustin Fresnel d. Robert A. Millikan 9. He was the first scientist 4. The existence of quarks was to find proof of Einstein’s first suggested by theory of relativity a. Max Planck a. Edwin Hubble b. Sheldon Glasgow b. George Gamow c. Murray Gell-Mann c. S. Chandrasekhar d. Albert Einstein d. Arthur Eddington 10. The credit for development of the cyclotron 5. The phenomenon of goes to: superconductivity was a. Carl Anderson b. Donald Glaser discovered by c. Ernest O. Lawrence d. Charles Wilson a. Heike Kamerlingh Onnes b. Alex Muller c. Brian D. Josephson 11. Who first proposed the use of absolute scale d. John Bardeen of Temperature? a. Anders Celsius b. Lord Kelvin c. Rudolf Clausius d.
    [Show full text]
  • The Franck-Hertz Experiment: 100 Years Ago and Now
    The Franck-Hertz experiment: 100 years ago and now A tribute to two great German scientists Zoltán Donkó1, Péter Magyar2, Ihor Korolov1 1 Institute for Solid State Physics and Optics, Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Budapest, Hungary 2 Physics Faculty, Roland Eötvös University, Budapest, Hungary Franck-Hertz experiment anno (~1914) The Nobel Prize in Physics 1925 was awarded jointly to James Franck and Gustav Ludwig Hertz "for their discovery of the laws governing the impact of an electron upon an atom" Anode current Primary experimental result 4.9 V nobelprize.org Elv: ! # " Accelerating voltage ! " Verh. Dtsch. Phys. Ges. 16: 457–467 (1914). Franck-Hertz experiment anno (~1914) The Nobel Prize in Physics 1925 was awarded jointly to James Franck and Gustav Ludwig Hertz "for their discovery of the laws governing the impact of an electron upon an atom" nobelprize.org Verh. Dtsch. Phys. Ges. 16: 457–467 (1914). Franck-Hertz experiment anno (~1914) “The electrons in Hg vapor experience only elastic collisions up to a critical velocity” “We show a method using which the critical velocity (i.e. the accelerating voltage) can be determined to an accuracy of 0.1 V; its value is 4.9 V.” “We show that the energy of the ray with 4.9 V corresponds to the energy quantum of the resonance transition of Hg (λ = 253.6 nm)” ((( “Part of the energy goes into excitation and part goes into ionization” ))) Important experimental evidence for the quantized nature of the atomic energy levels. The Franck-Hertz experiment: 100 years ago and now Franck-Hertz experiment: published in 1914, Nobel prize in 1925 Why is it interesting today as well? “Simple” explanation (“The electrons ....”) → description based on kinetic theory (Robson, Sigeneger, ...) Modern experiments Various gases (Hg, He, Ne, Ar) Modern experiment + kinetic description (develop an experiment that can be modeled accurately ...) → P.
    [Show full text]
  • 25 Years of Quantum Hall Effect
    S´eminaire Poincar´e2 (2004) 1 – 16 S´eminaire Poincar´e 25 Years of Quantum Hall Effect (QHE) A Personal View on the Discovery, Physics and Applications of this Quantum Effect Klaus von Klitzing Max-Planck-Institut f¨ur Festk¨orperforschung Heisenbergstr. 1 D-70569 Stuttgart Germany 1 Historical Aspects The birthday of the quantum Hall effect (QHE) can be fixed very accurately. It was the night of the 4th to the 5th of February 1980 at around 2 a.m. during an experiment at the High Magnetic Field Laboratory in Grenoble. The research topic included the characterization of the electronic transport of silicon field effect transistors. How can one improve the mobility of these devices? Which scattering processes (surface roughness, interface charges, impurities etc.) dominate the motion of the electrons in the very thin layer of only a few nanometers at the interface between silicon and silicon dioxide? For this research, Dr. Dorda (Siemens AG) and Dr. Pepper (Plessey Company) provided specially designed devices (Hall devices) as shown in Fig.1, which allow direct measurements of the resistivity tensor. Figure 1: Typical silicon MOSFET device used for measurements of the xx- and xy-components of the resistivity tensor. For a fixed source-drain current between the contacts S and D, the potential drops between the probes P − P and H − H are directly proportional to the resistivities ρxx and ρxy. A positive gate voltage increases the carrier density below the gate. For the experiments, low temperatures (typically 4.2 K) were used in order to suppress dis- turbing scattering processes originating from electron-phonon interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • CV Klaus Von Klitzing
    Curriculum Vitae Professor Dr. Klaus von Klitzing Name: Klaus von Klitzing Born: 28 June 1943 Major Scientific Interests: Solid State Research, Experimental Solid Physics, Low Dimensional Electron Systems, Quantum Hall Effect Nobel Prize in Physics 1985 Academic and Professional Career since 1985 Director at the Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research and Honorary Professor at Stuttgart University, Germany 1980 - 1984 Professor at the Technical University Munich, Germany 1978 Habilitation 1972 Ph.D. in Physics 1969 - 1980 University of Würzburg, Germany 1962 - 1969 Diploma in Physics Technical University Braunschweig, Germany Functions in Scientific Societies and Committees (Selection) 2011 Scientific Advisory Board Graphene Flagship 2008 Scientific Committee Bayer Climate Award Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften Leopoldina www.leopoldina.org 1 2007 EURAMET Research Council 2006 Board of Trustees “Institute of Advanced Studies” of TUM 2005 Jury Member START-Wittgenstein Program Austria 2005 Scientific Committee International Solvay Institutes 2000 NTT - Basic Research Laboratory Advisory Board 1992 Bord of Trustees of the German Museum Munich, Germany 1989 Bord of Trustees of the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt Braunschweig Honours and Awarded Memberships (Selection) 2019 Member of Orden Pour le Mérite 2012 TUM Distinguished Affiliated Professor 2011 Honorary Degree of the National University of Mongolia 2011 Honorary Degree of the Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 2010 Honorary Member of the Deutsche Hochschulverband
    [Show full text]
  • Q&A with Lauren Gunderson
    Q&A with Lauren Gunderson Interviewed by Joelle Seligson The United States’ most produced living playwright brings stories of science into the spotlight. Lauren Gunderson (laurengunderson.com) first married science and the stage in Background, a production that journeys back through the life of a cosmologist and through time itself. She’s now adding science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM)–oriented children’s books to her repertoire, entrancing young readers with imaginative tales tied to the scientific process. Gunderson chatted with Dimensions about why she’s driven to make audiences care about science and those who have advanced it. Lauren, which came first for you, theater or science? Theater was my first love, the first real sense of drive that I felt as a kid. Part of it was just the excitement of being on stage and telling stories. And also for me, the idea of writing, that was another big moment for me, realizing that you didn’t just say the words, you could write them. But I found out really quickly when you’re a writer and a performer, you get to ask yourself, OK—what I realized really quickly was, I mean obviously you need a subject. To be a playwright is a great thrill, but what are you going to write about? And I had a few wonderful science teachers, a biology teacher and a physics teacher, who used history and the scientists themselves to help teach us the core courses and the core themes and everything. And to me that was a big moment of oh, these are characters, and that science came from not just a mind but from a person, a personality, a time, an era.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 22 the Entropy of the Universe and the Maximum Entropy Production Principle
    Chapter 22 The Entropy of the Universe and the Maximum Entropy Production Principle Charles H. Lineweaver Abstract If the universe had been born in a high entropy, equilibrium state, there would be no stars, no planets and no life. Thus, the initial low entropy of the universe is the fundamental reason why we are here. However, we have a poor understanding of why the initial entropy was low and of the relationship between gravity and entropy. We are also struggling with how to meaningfully define the maximum entropy of the universe. This is important because the entropy gap between the maximum entropy of the universe and the actual entropy of the universe is a measure of the free energy left in the universe to drive all processes. I review these entropic issues and the entropy budget of the universe. I argue that the low initial entropy of the universe could be the result of the inflationary origin of matter from unclumpable false vacuum energy. The entropy of massive black holes dominates the entropy budget of the universe. The entropy of a black hole is proportional to the square of its mass. Therefore, determining whether the Maximum Entropy Production Principle (MaxEP) applies to the entropy of the universe is equivalent to determining whether the accretion disks around black holes are maximally efficient at dumping mass onto the central black hole. In an attempt to make this question more precise, I review the magnetic angular momentum transport mechanisms of accretion disks that are responsible for increasing the masses of black holes 22.1 The Entropy of the Observable Universe Stars are shining, supernovae are exploding, black holes are forming, winds on planetary surfaces are blowing dust around, and hot things like coffee mugs are cooling down.
    [Show full text]