DOCSLIB.ORG

Fresno Public Transportation Infrastructure Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fresno Public Transportation Infrastructure Study Fresno Public Transportation Infrastructure Study Task 1: Review of Current Plans and Studies May 27, 2005 Prepared for: Council of Fresno County Governments WC05-2162 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. OVERVIEW OF TASK 1 REPORT ........................................................................................................ 1 2. PREVIOUS STUDIES OF REGIONAL TRANSIT.................................................................................. 2 Study #1: Updated Preliminary Light Rail Transit Feasibility Analysis................................................... 2 Study #2: Fresno County Rail Concept Plan.......................................................................................... 4 Study # 3: Fresno County Rail Corridor Preservation/Acquisition and Transportation Alternatives Study for Council of Fresno County Governments................................................................................. 6 Study #4: Fresno Rail Consolidation Report for the Council of Fresno County Governments ........... 11 Study #5: The Travel Behavior and Needs of the Poor: A Study of Welfare Recipients in Fresno County, California ................................................................................................................................. 13 Study #6: Agricultural Industries Transportation Services Statewide Needs Assessment; Agricultural Worker Transportation Needs Assessment, Final Report.................................................................... 15 3. REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN – POLICY SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS............................ 17 2004 Regional Transportation Plan Policy Listing................................................................................17 4. GENERAL PLAN POLICY SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS................................................................... 26 General Plan Review for Transit Supportive Policies and Policy Effectiveness .................................. 26 Fresno County General Plan................................................................................................................ 26 Fresno County Subarea and Community Plans ................................................................................... 28 Sierra North Regional Plan................................................................................................................... 28 Coalinga Regional Plan ........................................................................................................................ 29 Westside Freeway Sub-Regional Plan................................................................................................. 29 Kings River Regional Plan.................................................................................................................... 29 Sierra South Regional Plan .................................................................................................................. 29 Biola Community Plan .......................................................................................................................... 29 Caruthers Community Plan .................................................................................................................. 29 Del Rey Community Plan ..................................................................................................................... 29 Easton Community Plan ....................................................................................................................... 30 Friant Community Plan ......................................................................................................................... 30 Laton Community Plan ......................................................................................................................... 30 Riverdale Community Plan ................................................................................................................... 30 Shaver Lake Community Plan.............................................................................................................. 30 Tranquility Community Plan.................................................................................................................. 31 Lenare Community Plan ....................................................................................................................... 31 Shaver Lake Forest Specific Plan ........................................................................................................ 31 Millerton Specific Plan .......................................................................................................................... 31 Quail Lakes Estates Specific Plan........................................................................................................ 32 Del Rio Specific Plan ............................................................................................................................ 33 City of Coalinga .................................................................................................................................... 33 City of Fowler........................................................................................................................................ 34 City of Firebaugh .................................................................................................................................. 35 City of Huron......................................................................................................................................... 36 City of Kerman...................................................................................................................................... 36 City of Kingsburg .................................................................................................................................. 37 City of Mendota..................................................................................................................................... 37 City of Orange Cove ............................................................................................................................. 38 City of Parlier ........................................................................................................................................ 39 City of Reedley ..................................................................................................................................... 40 City of Sanger....................................................................................................................................... 41 City of San Joaquin .............................................................................................................................. 42 City of Selma ........................................................................................................................................ 42 Fresno City and Clovis General Plan Policy Analysis .......................................................................... 44 Clovis .................................................................................................................................................... 48 5. FRESNO REGION TRANSIT PLANS AND ONGOING STUDIES ..................................................... 50 Fresno Area Express Short Range Transit Plan 2005– 10 .................................................................. 50 FAX Long Range Transit Master Plan.................................................................................................. 53 Clovis Short Range Transit Plan .......................................................................................................... 53 Rural Fresno County Area Short Range Transit Plan 2004 – 2009..................................................... 55 Fresno Alternative Mass Transportation Pre-Major Investment Study (2003/04) ................................ 62 6. TRANSIT-SUPPORTIVE POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................ 70 Transit Policy ........................................................................................................................................ 70 Land Use Policies................................................................................................................................. 72 Connectivity of the Pedestrian and Bicycle Network............................................................................ 74 Street Design Policies .......................................................................................................................... 75 Traffic Management Policies ................................................................................................................ 76 Parking Policies .................................................................................................................................... 77 Intergovernmental Coordination Policies.............................................................................................. 77 Air Quality Policies................................................................................................................................ 78 APPENDICES Appendix A: RTP Candidate Projects Appendix B: Land Use Survey Summary – Rail Corridors Within Fresno County Appendix C: General Plan Status – Fresno County Incorporated Areas Draft Report Fresno PTIS Project: Review of Current Plans and Studies May 2005 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Projected LRT Daily Ridership........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16
    California State Rail Plan 2005-06 to 2015-16 December 2005 California Department of Transportation ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor SUNNE WRIGHT McPEAK, Secretary Business, Transportation and Housing Agency WILL KEMPTON, Director California Department of Transportation JOSEPH TAVAGLIONE, Chair STATE OF CALIFORNIA ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER JEREMIAH F. HALLISEY, Vice Chair GOVERNOR BOB BALGENORTH MARIAN BERGESON JOHN CHALKER JAMES C. GHIELMETTI ALLEN M. LAWRENCE R. K. LINDSEY ESTEBAN E. TORRES SENATOR TOM TORLAKSON, Ex Officio ASSEMBLYMEMBER JENNY OROPEZA, Ex Officio JOHN BARNA, Executive Director CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 1120 N STREET, MS-52 P. 0 . BOX 942873 SACRAMENTO, 94273-0001 FAX(916)653-2134 (916) 654-4245 http://www.catc.ca.gov December 29, 2005 Honorable Alan Lowenthal, Chairman Senate Transportation and Housing Committee State Capitol, Room 2209 Sacramento, CA 95814 Honorable Jenny Oropeza, Chair Assembly Transportation Committee 1020 N Street, Room 112 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear: Senator Lowenthal Assembly Member Oropeza: On behalf of the California Transportation Commission, I am transmitting to the Legislature the 10-year California State Rail Plan for FY 2005-06 through FY 2015-16 by the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) with the Commission's resolution (#G-05-11) giving advice and consent, as required by Section 14036 of the Government Code. The ten-year plan provides Caltrans' vision for intercity rail service. Caltrans'l0-year plan goals are to provide intercity rail as an alternative mode of transportation, promote congestion relief, improve air quality, better fuel efficiency, and improved land use practices. This year's Plan includes: standards for meeting those goals; sets priorities for increased revenues, increased capacity, reduced running times; and cost effectiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • Of 6 GRADE SEPARATION PROGRAM TITLE 21
    I.05-07-016 CPSD/RWC/DAR/RXM APPENDIX 1 - California Administrative Code, Title 21, Division 2, Chapter 13, Grade Separation Projects Page 1 of 6 GRADE SEPARATION PROGRAM TITLE 21. Public Works Division 2. Department of Transportation Chapter 13. Grade Separation Projects -- Applications for Allocation or Supplemental Allocations (Register 82, No. 34, filed 8-21-82) Article 1. Applications §1552. Last Date to File. April 1 of each fiscal year is the last day on which applications for allocation of grade separation funds in that fiscal year can be filed; provided, however, if April 1 is a Saturday, Sunday or a State of California holiday, then the last date of filing shall be the next business day following April 1. Filing is accomplished by filing the application with the Department of Transportation in the manner hereafter stated. §1553. Place to File. The complete application in triplicate must be received in the Office of the District Director of Transportation, State of California, in the transportation district in which the applicant is located, no later than 4:00 p.m. on the last day for filing. §1554. Contents of Application. The complete application must include a written request for an allocation in a specified monetary amount along with copies of each of the following attached to it: (a) All necessary orders of the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California. Necessary orders of the Public Utilities Commission include: (1) An order authorizing construction of the project; I.05-07-016 CPSD/RWC/DAR/RXM APPENDIX 1 - California Administrative Code, Title 21, Division 2, Chapter 13, Grade Separation Projects Page 2 of 6 (2) A statement of the applicant's position on the annual priority list established by the Public Utilities Commission pursuant to Streets & Highways Code Section 2452.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Unitary Value-Setting Meeting May 25, 2021
    2021 Unitary Value-Setting Meeting May 25, 2021 This document was created for public distribution and does not contain the Lead Values or Staff Recommended Values provided to the Board Members State-Assessed Properties Division Jack McCool, Chief _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ TED GAINES MALIA M. COHEN ANTONIO VAZQUEZ MIKE SCHAEFER BETTY T. YEE BRENDA FLEMING BOARD MEMBERS First District Second District Third District Fourth District State Controller Executive Director Sacramento San Francisco Santa Monica San Diego Item AA (Rev1: 5/19/21) CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 5/25/21 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION – STATE-ASSESSED PROPERTIES DIVISION UNITARY VALUE-SETTING WORKBOOK LIEN DATE 2021 PAGE INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION NUMBER Electric Generation Facilities (1100 – 1199) 1 – 2 Energy Companies (100 - 199) 3 – 4 Pipeline Companies (400-499) 5 Railroad Companies (800-899) 6 Telecommunications Companies (Local Exchange) (200 - 399) 7 Telecommunications Companies (Wireless) (2500 - 3999) 8 Telecommunications Companies (Interexchange) (2000-2499 and 7500-8999) 9 – 14 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION - STATE-ASSESSED PROPERTIES DIVISION Unitary Value Setting Workbook - Lien Date 2021 Electric Generation Facilities Item SBE No. No. Assessee Name 1 1100 AES Alamitos, LLC 2 1101 AES Redondo Beach, LLC 3 1102 AES Huntington Beach, LLC 4 1103 Dynegy Moss Landing, LLC 5 1105 Dynegy Oakland, LLC 6 1111 Long Beach Generation LLC 7 1112 CXA La Paloma, LLC 8 1115 GenOn California South LP - Ormond Beach 9 1117 GenOn California South LP - Ellwood 10 1122 MRP San Joaquin Energy, LLC - Hanford 11 1123 MRP San Joaquin Energy, LLC - Henrietta 12 1124 MRP San Joaquin Energy, LLC - Tracy 13 1126 Elk Hills Power, LLC 14 1127 High Desert Power Trust 15 1128 Delta Energy Center, LLC 16 1129 Gilroy Energy Center, LLC 17 1131 Pastoria Energy Facility, LLC 18 1132 CCFC Sutter Energy, LLC 19 1133 Metcalf Energy Center, LLC 20 1134 Otay Mesa Generating Company, LLC 21 1136 Blythe Energy, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • California Rail Plan
    HE 2771 .C2 C42 2001/02 2001 -02 to 2010-11 LIBRARY COPY CALIF. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION LIBRARY 1120 N STREET, SACRAMENTO March 2002 California Department of Transportation GRAY DAVIS, Governor MARIA CONTRERAS SWEET, Secretary . Business, Transportation and Housing Agency ;_ --~--.-JEFF MORALES;~reaor · :--. j'·California'be': ·n~emofT iarlooifaoon rlil \ r ~TE OP CALJ1:QRWA-BUSINESS. TRANSPORTATION AND HQUSlNG AGENCY GRAY DAVIS Governor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR ~ 1120 N STREET ~ P. 0 . BOX 942873 Flex your power! SACRAMENTO, CA 94273-0001 Be energy effic1enU PHONE (916) 654-5267 FAX (916) 654-6608 ITY (916) 654-4086 March 1, 2002 Members, California LegisJature State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Members: I am pleased to submit to you the California Department of Transportation's (Department) California State Rail Plan 2001-02 to 2010-11. The Department has prepared the Plaa as an examination of intercity passenger rail and freight rail transportation in California, in accordance with Section 14036 of the Government Code. The passenger element of the Plan reviews the current operations of the three State-supported intercity rail passenger routes (Pacific Surfliner, San Joaquin, and Capitol), and outlines ten-year plans for capital improvements and service expansions. This element aJso addresses the Depanment's vision for intercity rail and its standards for achievement of ten-year goals, and discusses potential new routes including high-speed rail. ~ The freight element of the Plan is an overview of the State freight rail system, looking at commodities and volumes of goods moving in and out of the State. This element aJso looks at freight issues like capacity concerns, intermoda] traffic, passenger and freight trains sharing right of way, short line railroad issues, funding programs, environmental issues, new technology, and future needs and objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 BOE Minutes May 30, 2018
    16 2018 MINUTES OF THE STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION Wednesday, May 30, 2018 The Board met at its offices at 450 N Street, Sacramento, at 9:30 a.m., with Mr. Runner, Chairman, Ms. Ma, Vice Chairwoman, Mr. Horton, Ms. Harkey and Ms. Yee present. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Ms. Yee. The Board recessed at 9:33 a.m. and reconvened at 9:37 a.m. with Mr. Runner, Ms. Ma, Mr. Horton, Ms. Harkey and Ms. Yee present. BOARD MEMBER ANNUAL PHOTOGRAPH The annual Board photograph was taken. BOARD MEMBER REQUESTED MATTER Recommendation for Board Positions on ACA 12 & AB 1596 Ms. Ma made introductory remarks regarding her recommendation for Board Positions on ACA 12 & AB 1596: Property Tax Relief to Families of Disabled Children (Exhibit 5.1). Speaker: Assembly Member Todd Gloria, Representing the 78th District Action: Upon motion of Ms. Harkey, seconded by Mr. Horton and unanimously carried, Mr. Runner, Ms. Ma, Mr. Horton, Ms. Harkey and Ms. Yee voting yes, the Board supported the bills as recommended by Ms. Ma. Exhibits to these minutes are incorporated by reference. PROPERTY TAX MATTER STATE ASSESSED PROPERTIES VALUE SETTING Richard Reisinger, Chief, State-Assessed Properties Division, Property Tax Department, made introductory remarks regarding the valuation of state-assessed properties. Electric Generation Facilities Action: Upon motion of Ms. Harkey, seconded by Ms. Yee and unanimously carried, Mr. Runner, Ms. Ma, Mr. Horton, Ms. Harkey and Ms. Yee voting yes, the Board ordered that the market value to be used in the assessment
    [Show full text]
  • FRA Guide for Preparing Accidents/Incidents Reports U.S
    FRA Guide for Preparing Accidents/Incidents Reports U.S. Departm ent of Transportation Federal Railroad Administration Office of Safety ft DOT/FRA/RRS-22 Revised: October 1, 1992 [] Effective: January 1,1993 1 12 - Safety CONTENTS Introduction ...................................................... i Accident/Incident Reporting (Record-Keeping Requirements) . ........ I Definitions..........................................................II Railroad Injury and Illness Summary (Form 6180-55) .............. Ill Railroad Injury and Illness Summary (Continuation Sheet) (Form 6180-55a)................................................... IV Rail Equipment Accident/Incident Report (Form 6180-54) V Employee Human Factor Attachment (Form 6180-81) .................... VI Notice to Employee Involved in Human Factor Caused . Accident (Form 6180-78).......................................... VTI Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Accident/Incident Report (Form 6180-57) VIII Annual Railroad Report of Hours Worked by State (Form 6180-56) IX Annual Summary Report of Railroad Injury and Illness (Form 6180-45) X Appendices Appendix A - Railroad Codes ............... A Appendix B - State Codes .......................................... B Appendix C - Train Accident Cause Codes .............. C Appendix D - Employee Job Codes .................................... D Appendix E - Injury and Illness Codes .............................. E Appendix F - Casualty Occurrence Codes ............................ F Appendix G - Questions and Answers ...................... ....
    [Show full text]
  • COM/MF1/Avs/Sbf Order Instituting Investigation for The
    COM/MF1/avs/sbf Date of Issuance 7/3/2013 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Investigation for the purpose of establishing a list for the fiscal years 2014-2015 and 2015-2016 of existing FILED crossings at grade of city streets, county PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION roads or state highways in need of JUNE 27, 2013 separation, or existing separations in need SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE of alterations or reconstruction in INVESTIGATION 13-06-014 accordance with Section 2452 of the California Streets and Highways Code. ORDER INSTITUTING INVESTIGATION Summary This Order Instituting Investigation (OII) is for the purpose of establishing the Grade Separation Priority List for the fiscal years 2014-2015 and 2015-2016. The OII requests project nominations from interested parties for existing crossings at grade of city streets, county roads, or state highways in need of grade separation, or existing grade separations in need of alterations or reconstruction in accordance with Section 2452 of the California Streets and Highways Code. Completed nomination applications must be filed by October 25, 2013. Nomination forms and instructions are contained in this OII and are available on-line at the California Public Utilities Commission’s website at: http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/PUC/safety/Rail/Crossings/funding.htm. Background Section 2452 of the California Streets and Highways (S&H) Code requires the California Public Utilities Commission (Commission) to establish the Grade Separation Program Priority List (Priority List) for projects and furnish it to the 70299839 - 1 - I.13-06-014 COM/MF1/avs/sbf California Transportation Commission (CTC) by July 1st of each year for use in the fiscal year (FY) beginning on that date.
    [Show full text]
  • Amtrak's Twilight Shoreliner Service Debuts ·
    SPECIAL REPORT: AMTRAK'S TWILIGHT SHORELINER SERVICE DEBUTS · -, The RAILROAD PRESS Magazine proudly presents two fully-illustrated stories of our American railroad heritage... The 1947 Freedom Train, and the Chicago, North Shore & Milwaukee Ry. Subscribe to The Railroad Press for $16 for one year (4 issues) starting with Issue #34 featuring the 50th Anniversary of the 1947 Freedom Train, and receive Issue #32 featur­ ing North Shore Memories absolutely free!! Name Send check, money order Please begin YES!!! or credit card info to: my one year (4 issues) Address subscription to TRP for The Railroad Press City only $16.00. Please start 1150 Carlisle St. #444K with Issue #34 featuring Hanover, PA 17331 State Zip the 50th Anniversary of the Freedom Train, and send Foreign customers Phone Required for credit card orders me Issue #32 featuring write for rates Card # Exp. Chicago, North Shore and Milwaukee memories free! Dealer Inquiries Welcome! Signature Not good in conjunction with any other offer. Offerexpires 12/31/98 e October 1997al Issue 407 FE ATURES Some30 Decade Wisconsin Central's first 10 years have been eventful. Andrew S. Nelson I(nox Station32 Bed & Rails A new bed-and-breakfast in central Illinois is recommended for raiIfans. George S. Pitarys Steve Smedley DE PARTMENTS 34 4 Editorial Appalachian' Interludes 5 Letters A western railroader finds thrills in them eastern hills. 8 Expediter Patrick D. Flynn 12 Expediter Special Report 14 From the Cab 18 Burlington Northern &. Santa Fe 22 VIA Rail Canada 48 24 Conrail UP Locomotive Renumberings 2G Amtrak The post-merger motive power fleet receives new numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • PC*MILER Geocode Files Reference Guide | Page 1 File Usage Restrictions All Geocode Files Are Copyrighted Works of ALK Technologies, Inc
    Reference Guide | Beta v10.3.0 | Revision 1​ .​ 0 ​ Copyrights You may print one (1) copy of this document for your personal use. Otherwise, no part of this document may be reproduced, transmitted, transcribed, stored in a retrieval system, or translated into any language, in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, magnetic, optical, or otherwise, without prior written permission from ALK Technologies, Inc. Copyright © 1986-2017 ALK Technologies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. ALK Data © 2017 – All Rights Reserved. ALK Technologies, Inc. reserves the right to make changes or improvements to its programs and documentation materials at any time and without prior notice. PC*MILER®, CoPilot® Truck™, ALK®, RouteSync®, and TripDirect® are registered trademarks of ALK Technologies, Inc. Microsoft and Windows are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and other countries. IBM is a registered trademark of International Business Machines Corporation. Xceed Toolkit and AvalonDock Libraries Copyright © 1994-2016 Xceed Software Inc., all rights reserved. The Software is protected by Canadian and United States copyright laws, international treaties and other applicable national or international laws. Satellite Imagery © DigitalGlobe, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Weather data provided by Environment Canada (EC), U.S. National Weather Service (NWS), U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and AerisWeather. © Copyright 2017. All Rights Reserved. Traffic information provided by INRIX © 2017. All rights reserved by INRIX, Inc. Standard Point Location Codes (SPLC) data used in PC*MILER products is owned, maintained and copyrighted by the National Motor Freight Traffic Association, Inc. Statistics Canada Postal Code™ Conversion File which is based on data licensed from Canada Post Corporation.
    [Show full text]
  • Gcorgeneral Code of Operating Rules
    GCORGeneral Code of Operating Rules Eighth Edition Eff ective April 1, 2020 These rules govern the operation of the adopting railroads and supersede all previous GCOR rules and instructions. © 2020 General Code of Operating Rules Committee, All Rights Reserved i-2 GCOR—Eighth Edition—April 1, 2020 Bauxite & Northern Railway Company Front cover photo by William Diehl Bay Coast Railroad Adopted by: The Bay Line Railroad, L.L.C. Belt Railway Company of Chicago Aberdeen Carolina & Western Railway BHP Nevada Railway Company Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad B&H Rail Corp Acadiana Railway Company Birmingham Terminal Railroad Adams Industries Railroad Blackwell Northern Gateway Railroad Adrian and Blissfield Railroad Blue Ridge Southern Railroad Affton Terminal Railroad BNSF Railway Ag Valley Railroad Bogalusa Bayou Railroad Alabama & Gulf Coast Railway LLC Boise Valley Railroad Alabama Southern Railroad Buffalo & Pittsburgh Railroad, Inc. Alabama & Tennessee River Railway, LLC Burlington Junction Railway Alabama Warrior Railroad Butte, Anaconda & Pacific Railroad Alaska Railroad Corporation C&J Railroad Company Albany & Eastern Railroad Company California Northern Railroad Company Aliquippa & Ohio River Railroad Co. California Western Railroad Alliance Terminal Railway, LLC Camas Prairie RailNet, Inc. Altamont Commuter Express Rail Authority Camp Chase Railway Alton & Southern Railway Canadian Pacific Amtrak—Chicago Terminal Caney Fork & Western Railroad Amtrak—Michigan Line Canon City and Royal Gorge Railroad Amtrak—NOUPT Capital Metropolitan Transportation
    [Show full text]
  • Pcmrail21 Userguide.Pdf
    ALL RIGHTS RESERVED You may print one (1) copy of this document for your personal use. Otherwise, no part of this document may be reproduced, transmitted, transcribed, stored in a retrieval system, or translated into any language, in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, magnetic, optical, or otherwise, without prior written permission from ALK Technologies, Inc. Microsoft and Windows are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and other countries. PC*MILER, CoPilot, ALK and RouteSync are registered trademarks of ALK Technologies, Inc. Copyright 2014 Railinc Corporation. All Rights Reserved. The Centralized Station Master, Junction-Interchange Master and Mark/SCAC Register appearing in this publication may not be reproduced without express permission from Railinc. ALK Technologies, Inc. reserves the right to make changes or improvements to its programs and documentation materials at any time and without prior notice. Copyright 1986-2014 ALK Technologies, Inc. 457 North Harrison Street, Princeton, NJ 08540 Table of Contents PC*MILER® Product Line END-USER LICENSE AGREEMENT ........................... iii Chapter 1: INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 1 1.1 What Is PC*MILER|Rail? ............................................................................................1 1.2 Additional PC*MILER|Rail Solutions .........................................................................2 1.3 Recent New Features and Enhancements .....................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Fr-4915-01-P Department Of
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 05/15/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-11781, and on FDsys.gov FR-4915-01-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Surface Transportation Board [Docket No. FD 35772] San Joaquin Valley Railroad Co.—Lease Amendment and Operation Exemption Including Interchange Commitment—BNSF Railway Company San Joaquin Valley Railroad Co. (SJVR), a Class III rail carrier, has filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.41 to continue to lease from BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) and operate the Landco spur line between the Porterville Subdivision, MP 111+ 4029 feet, near Oil Junction, Cal., and milepost 113 + 3717 feet at or near Bakersfield, Cal., a distance of approximately 2.0 +/- miles (the Leased Line). SJVR states that it has entered into an amendment to extend the term of, and make other minor changes to, the lease, which originally was part of a broader agreement between SJVR’s predecessor, Tulare Valley Railroad Company, and BNSF’s predecessor, The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company (ATSF). SJVR states that it will continue to be the operator of the Leased Line. According to SJVR, the agreement between SJVR and BNSF contains an interchange commitment that affects interchange with carriers other than ATSF, now BNSF. In its verified notice of exemption, SJVR submits a map of the affected interchange points. As required under 49 CFR 1150.43(h)(1), SJVR also provided additional information regarding the interchange commitment. Docket No. FD 35772 SJVR has certified that its projected annual revenues as a result of this transaction will not result in its becoming a Class II or Class I rail carrier.
    [Show full text]