Hidden Tibet: History of Independence and Occupation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hidden Tibet: History of Independence and Occupation Hidden Tibet: History of Independence and Occupation by Sergius L. Kuzmin Edited by Andrey Terentyev Translated from Russian by Dmitry Bennett Originally published as: Hidden Tibet. History of Independence and Occupation. Sergius L. Kuzmin. 2010. St. Petersburg: Narthang. Copyright © 2011: Library of Tibetan Works and Archives ALL RIGHTS RESERVED No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photo-copying, recording or otherwise, without the prior per- mission of the publisher. ISBN: 978-93-80359-47-2 Published by the Library of Tibetan Works and Archives, Dharamsala, H.P. 176215, and printed at Indraprastha Press (CBT), Nehru House, New Del- hi-110002 Contents Introduction v Chapter 1. Geography and Origin of the Tibetans 1 Chapter 2. Antiquity and the Middle Ages 9 Chapter 3. Epoch of the Qing Empire 41 Chapter 4. Last Years of Independence 83 Chapter 5. Religion and Culture 109 Chapter 6. State, Society and Economy 129 Chapter 7. “Peaceful Liberation” and Its Consequences 157 Chapter 8. From the People’s Uprising to the Cultural Revolution 207 Chapter 9. The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution. Results of the Mao Period 287 Chapter 10. Reconstruction and Modernization 347 The Tibetan People’s Struggle, the Dalai Lama and Tibetan Refugees 353 Religion 387 Autonomy and Demography 409 Language, Education and Culture 418 Condition of the Natural Environment 424 Economy 428 Militarization 434 Living Standards and Health Care 436 Chapter 11. Tibet, an Inseparable Part of China? 441 Statehood in International Law and in the Chinese Tradition 441 On China and the “Chinese Dynasties” 452 Solution to the “Ethnic Problem” in China 470 The Status of Tibet: a Historical Retrospective 480 Chapter 12. Decline of the Tibetan-Mongolian Civilization? 503 References 509 Introduction Tibet is one of the most esoteric places on our planet. People from different civilizations have a hard time understanding its history, religions and customs. Some aspects of the history of Tibet are unknown to many – partly because of the country’s isolation that lasted for many centuries, and partly due to specifics of its political system and international relations. Propaganda became another such obstacle during the more recent decades. If Tibet was always an inherent part of China, then why is it not the same as China? What should we make of Tibetans’ regular declarations: is it separatism or a national liberation movement? Following the October Revolution, the Soviet Union and Russia has gone through several stages in ways of covering the last half century of events in Tibet. The initial response was unconditional praise mounted on everything done there by the Communist Party of China (CPC) and explanation of all actions of its opponents as the machinations of imperialists.1 Then, following the decline of Soviet–Chinese relations during the Khrushchev era, criticism came into vogue. Attention was directed at Maoists “perverting Marxism”. However, some works became a source of valuable historical information.2 Once the relationships between the USSR and PRC normalised again, a pluralism of views was established. Different perspectives started to coexist in Russia, ranging from worshiping Mao Zedong and/or the Chinese reforms to rejecting the latter altogether from the human rights perspective. Even during the most recent times, these trends continue to gather momentum with more impartial takes on the situation becoming progressively rarer. Publications from the “stagnation” period also became scarce. This coincided with PRC’s decision to step up the propaganda regarding Tibet, especially abroad.3 Specifically selected Tibetans and Tibetologists from PRC were sent out on organised tours, foreign journalists were invited into 1 E.g. Gurevich, 1958. 2 E.g. Bogoslovsky et al., 1975; Bogoslovsky, 1978. 3 Modern Politics of China in Tibet, 2000. vi Hidden Tibet: History of Independence & Occupation Tibet, exhibitions and publications were organised, internet sites were created, etc. Documents that were meant to support the position of the Chinese authorities started to be published. At the same time documents that have the opposite effect continued to be suppressed. The activity of foreign leftist propagandists has also increased.4 Chinese authorities as well as Tibetan emigrants have been producing a lot of materials in foreign languages (e.g. in English and Russian) for the past 50 years. It is clear that this way they voice those arguments that they themselves consider to be the strongest. It should be noted that information that comes from both sides may be verified in a very few cases. Accurate verification would only be possible with the help of independent expertise commissions, which at present are not allowed by the Chinese authorities. As far as the history of Tibet is concerned, it has been portrayed on many occasions, and there are a number of good overviews which analyze publications, documents and research on the topic in great detail. The key writings are listed at the end of this book. There is no sense in repeating these works. It is more interesting to synthesise and juxtapose that information to answer the questions that seem banal: What is Tibet? Was it independent or part of other countries? Where are the foundations of the modern Chinese stance on the Tibetan issue? To what extent is the inclusion of Tibet into the PRC beyond controversy, and what did Chinese reforms bring to Tibetan people? What do Tibetans themselves think on this issue? This book strives to answer these questions by comparing different and sometimes opposing points of view. Historical facts are given in chapters 1–10, and their analysis in context of international relations at different periods in Chapter 11. The aim of this book is not to conduct a detailed analysis of sources that used Chinese and Tibetan languages, but rather to provide a synthesis of research in different fields at this current point in time. Therefore, for the most part, overview publications were utilised in the creation of this book. These publications contain links to a multitude of sources that were listed and analysed in great detail. At the same time, this book contains little known and previously unpublished information. The text also contains footnotes to sources that are listed at the end of the book. For internet sites, references state the dates of their last checking. If a paragraph contains several phrases belonging to the same source, the footnote is given after the first but not last phrase. Quotations are included in commas, omissions within paragraphs by omission points, omissions of one or several phrases or paragraphs by one sign <…> irrespective of how many phrases or paragraphs were omitted. All work has been done without outside financial support and under the personal initiative of the author. The author would like to sincerely thank everybody who 4 E.g. Parenti, M. Firendly feudalism; Ely, M. The true story... Introduction vii has helped him in this project by submitting photographs, messages that came to be included in the book, giving consultations, participating in discussions for this book: Archives of the Russian Geographical Society, Jose Ignacio Cabezon, Alex Catanese, Deutsche Bundesarchiv, DIIR Archive of Central Tibetan Administration, L. Chandra, Don Croner, Sonam N. Dagpo, Sergey V. Dmitriev, Irina R. Garri, A.J. Goryainov, Palden Gyatso, Institute of Oriental Studies of Russian Academy of Sciences, Tsering Dolma Khangsertsang, Ray Kreisel, Losell Doll Museum at Norbulingka, Norbulingka Institute Archive, Norzin Dolma, Ngawang Riglam, Nawang Rabgyal Norpa, Tenpa Soepa, Ngawang Tukje, A.I. Roshchin, Charlotte & Jerome Ryan, Savetibet Foundation, Tatiana L. Shaumian, Tashi, Tsering Norzom, Urgen Tenzin (TCHRD), Thuptan Samphel, TibetInfoNet, Tempa Tsering, Kelsang Takla, Andrey Terentyev, Sonam Topgyal, Ngawang Woebar, Tsering Woeser, Alison Wright, Julia Zhironkina. I would like to acknowledge and thank Dr. Chok Tenzin Monlam, Head of Research and Translation Department at the Library of Tibetan Works and Archives, for his meticulous checking of facts, proofreading the English manuscript several times, and for reading it again for publication; I also thank Ms Fiona Halar for the many hours she spent initially editing the English version, and Ms Kerry Wright for the final editing and proofreading. I would like to thank Tsering Namgyal for his important work with the book layout. This English translation is based on first Russian edition published in 2010. It is almost identical to that, but contains some minor changes. First, some passages, which seem to be interesting almost exclusively for a Russian audience, have been shortened: discussions on propaganda in the Russian media and widespread views in Russia in regards to the current situation in Tibet; content of some popular books with some errors regarding Buddhism and Tibet; analysis of current relations between Russia and China. Second, some misprints and errors occurring in the Russian edition were corrected. And third, some English-language sources were quoted instead of their Russian translations used in the edition of 2010. CHAPTER 1 Geography and Origin of the Tibetans he Tibetan Plateau, located in the centre of Asia, is one of the largest and Thighest areas in the world. Its area is 2,200,000 square kilometres. Significant parts of Tibet are at altitudes of 3,000–4,000 meters above sea level while the height of the mountains reach 5,000–7,000 meters. The peaks of high mountains are covered with ice and snow. Therefore, Tibet is often called the Land of Snowy Mountains (Land of Snow). The highest mountain in the world, Jomo Langma (Everest), the height of which is 8,848 meters, sits on the border of Tibet and Nepal. Another high mountain, Kanchenjunga (8,598 meters) is situated on the border of Tibet, Nepal and the Indian state of Sikkim. Many other high mountains fringe Tibet like a precious necklace: Mount Kailash, Zari, Yarlha Shambo, Chomo Kenreg, Gangkar Shama, Nyenchen Thangla, Machen (Amnye Machen).
Recommended publications
  • Making the State on the Sino-Tibetan Frontier: Chinese Expansion and Local Power in Batang, 1842-1939
    Making the State on the Sino-Tibetan Frontier: Chinese Expansion and Local Power in Batang, 1842-1939 William M. Coleman, IV Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Columbia University 2014 © 2013 William M. Coleman, IV All rights reserved Abstract Making the State on the Sino-Tibetan Frontier: Chinese Expansion and Local Power in Batang, 1842-1939 William M. Coleman, IV This dissertation analyzes the process of state building by Qing imperial representatives and Republican state officials in Batang, a predominantly ethnic Tibetan region located in southwestern Sichuan Province. Utilizing Chinese provincial and national level archival materials and Tibetan language works, as well as French and American missionary records and publications, it explores how Chinese state expansion evolved in response to local power and has three primary arguments. First, by the mid-nineteenth century, Batang had developed an identifiable structure of local governance in which native chieftains, monastic leaders, and imperial officials shared power and successfully fostered peace in the region for over a century. Second, the arrival of French missionaries in Batang precipitated a gradual expansion of imperial authority in the region, culminating in radical Qing military intervention that permanently altered local understandings of power. While short-lived, centrally-mandated reforms initiated soon thereafter further integrated Batang into the Qing Empire, thereby
    [Show full text]
  • Mt. Kailash Pilgrimage Kora Grand Tour
    MT. KAILASH PILGRIMAGE KORA GRAND TOUR Tashi delek! Tibetan Guide Travel Tours is a small travel agency based in Lhasa. We always work hard and take responsible for our clients by using local services as much as possible. Of course we use Tibetan drivers and tour guides. Who are experienced, have rich knowledge about Tibetan culture and also excellent attitude. We are confident that you would not be disappointed if you choose our services letting us show you our mother land. Proposed itinerary Day 1: Lhasa arrival [3650m] Upon arrival in Lhasa you will be welcomed by your English-speaking Tibetan Guide and Tibetan Driver who will bring you to your hotel. Acclimatization to high altitude: please, drink lots of water and take plenty of rest in order to minimize altitude sickness. Overnight at Shambhala Palace or House of Shambhala Hotel, which are a Tibetan style hotel located in Lhasa city center (Barkhor) Day 2: Lhasa sightseeing We begin visiting Ramoche Temple, built in honor of the image of Jowo Rinpoche that Chinese princess Wencheng brought by marrying Songtsen Gampo, the first king of Buddhist doctrine and who unified the Tibetan empire in the 7th century. Thereafter, we continue with Jokhang Temple, the most sacred monastery in Tibet. It was also founded in the 7th century by Songtsen Gampo. Later you can explore the surrounding Barkhor old quarter and spend time walking around Jokhang Temple following pilgrims from all over the Tibetan plateau. In the afternoon we go to Sera Monastery, one of three great universities of Gelugpa Sect. We will attend the debating session of the monks.
    [Show full text]
  • Tibet Under Chinese Communist Rule
    TIBET UNDER CHINESE COMMUNIST RULE A COMPILATION OF REFUGEE STATEMENTS 1958-1975 A SERIES OF “EXPERT ON TIBET” PROGRAMS ON RADIO FREE ASIA TIBETAN SERVICE BY WARREN W. SMITH 1 TIBET UNDER CHINESE COMMUNIST RULE A Compilation of Refugee Statements 1958-1975 Tibet Under Chinese Communist Rule is a collection of twenty-seven Tibetan refugee statements published by the Information and Publicity Office of His Holiness the Dalai Lama in 1976. At that time Tibet was closed to the outside world and Chinese propaganda was mostly unchallenged in portraying Tibet as having abolished the former system of feudal serfdom and having achieved democratic reforms and socialist transformation as well as self-rule within the Tibet Autonomous Region. Tibetans were portrayed as happy with the results of their liberation by the Chinese Communist Party and satisfied with their lives under Chinese rule. The contrary accounts of the few Tibetan refugees who managed to escape at that time were generally dismissed as most likely exaggerated due to an assumed bias and their extreme contrast with the version of reality presented by the Chinese and their Tibetan spokespersons. The publication of these very credible Tibetan refugee statements challenged the Chinese version of reality within Tibet and began the shift in international opinion away from the claims of Chinese propaganda and toward the facts as revealed by Tibetan eyewitnesses. As such, the publication of this collection of refugee accounts was an important event in the history of Tibetan exile politics and the international perception of the Tibet issue. The following is a short synopsis of the accounts.
    [Show full text]
  • On Bhutanese and Tibetan Dzongs **
    ON BHUTANESE AND TIBETAN DZONGS ** Ingun Bruskeland Amundsen** “Seen from without, it´s a rocky escarpment! Seen from within, it´s all gold and treasure!”1 There used to be impressive dzong complexes in Tibet and areas of the Himalayas with Tibetan influence. Today most of them are lost or in ruins, a few are restored as museums, and it is only in Bhutan that we find the dzongs still alive today as administration centers and monasteries. This paper reviews some of what is known about the historical developments of the dzong type of buildings in Tibet and Bhutan, and I shall thus discuss towers, khars (mkhar) and dzongs (rdzong). The first two are included in this context as they are important in the broad picture of understanding the historical background and typological developments of the later dzongs. The etymological background for the term dzong is also to be elaborated. Backdrop What we call dzongs today have a long history of development through centuries of varying religious and socio-economic conditions. Bhutanese and Tibetan histories describe periods verging on civil and religious war while others were more peaceful. The living conditions were tough, even in peaceful times. Whatever wealth one possessed had to be very well protected, whether one was a layman or a lama, since warfare and strife appear to have been endemic. Security measures * Paper presented at the workshop "The Lhasa valley: History, Conservation and Modernisation of Tibetan Architecture" at CNRS in Paris Nov. 1997, and submitted for publication in 1999. ** Ingun B. Amundsen, architect MNAL, lived and worked in Bhutan from 1987 until 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • Buddhist Archeology in Mongolia: Zanabazar and the Géluk Diaspora Beyond Tibet
    Buddhist Archeology in Mongolia: Zanabazar and the Géluk Diaspora beyond Tibet Uranchimeg Tsultemin, Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) Uranchimeg, Tsultemin. 2019. “Buddhist Archeology in Mongolia: Zanabazar and the Géluk Dias- pora beyond Tibet.” Cross-Currents: East Asian History and Culture Review (e-journal) 31: 7–32. https://cross-currents.berkeley.edu/e-journal/issue-31/uranchimeg. Abstract This article discusses a Khalkha reincarnate ruler, the First Jebtsundampa Zanabazar, who is commonly believed to be a Géluk protagonist whose alliance with the Dalai and Panchen Lamas was crucial to the dissemination of Buddhism in Khalkha Mongolia. Za- nabazar’s Géluk affiliation, however, is a later Qing-Géluk construct to divert the initial Khalkha vision of him as a reincarnation of the Jonang historian Tāranātha (1575–1634). Whereas several scholars have discussed the political significance of Zanabazar’s rein- carnation based only on textual sources, this article takes an interdisciplinary approach to discuss, in addition to textual sources, visual records that include Zanabazar’s por- traits and current findings from an ongoing excavation of Zanabazar’s Saridag Monas- tery. Clay sculptures and Zanabazar’s own writings, heretofore little studied, suggest that Zanabazar’s open approach to sectarian affiliations and his vision, akin to Tsongkhapa’s, were inclusive of several traditions rather than being limited to a single one. Keywords: Zanabazar, Géluk school, Fifth Dalai Lama, Jebtsundampa, Khalkha, Mongo- lia, Dzungar Galdan Boshogtu, Saridag Monastery, archeology, excavation The First Jebtsundampa Zanabazar (1635–1723) was the most important protagonist in the later dissemination of Buddhism in Mongolia. Unlike the Mongol imperial period, when the sectarian alliance with the Sakya (Tib.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnic Minorities in Custody
    Ethnic Minorities In Custody Following is a list of prisoners from China's ethnic minority groups who are believed to be currently in custody for alleged political crimes. For space reasons, this list for the most part includes only those already convicted and sentenced to terms of imprisonment. It also does not include death sentences, which are normally carried out soon after sentencing unless an appeal is pending. The large majority of the offenses involve allegations of separatism or other state security crimes. Because of limited access to information, this list must be con- sidered incomplete and only an indication of the scale of the situation. In addition, there is conflicting information from different sources in some cases, including alternate spellings of names, and the information presented below represents a best guess on which informa- tion is more accurate. Sources: HRIC, Amnesty International, Congressional-Executive Commission on China, International Campaign for Tibet, Tibetan Centre for Human Rights and Democracy, Tibet Information Network, Southern Mongolia Information Center, Uyghur Human Rights Project, World Uyghur Congress, East Turkistan Information Center, Radio Free Asia, Human Rights Watch. INNER MONGOLIA AUTONOMOUS REGION DATE OF NAME DETENTION BACKGROUND SENTENCE OFFENSE PRISON Hada 10-Dec-95 An owner of Mongolian Academic 6-Dec-96, 15 years inciting separatism and No. 4 Prison of Inner Bookstore, as well as the founder espionage Mongolia, Chi Feng and editor-in-chief of The Voice of Southern Mongolia, Hada was arrested for publishing an under- ground journal and for founding and leading the Southern Mongolian Democracy Alliance (SMDA). Naguunbilig 7-Jun-05 Naguunbilig, a popular Mongolian Reportedly tried on practicing an evil cult, Inner Mongolia, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Activities Report 2010-2020
    Activities Report 2010 - 2020 Celebrating our 10th Anniversary! Shang Shung Institute UK Activities Report 2010 - 2020 Dear Friends, The Shang Shung Institute UK (SSIUK) is pleased to present a summary of the acti- vities that our team of dedicated staff, volunteers and supporters have carried out since its inception in May 2010 under the guidance and direction of the late Chögyal Namkhai Norbu. Our activities since 2010 are listed below as well as our fundraising projects. This will give you an overview of our work in the past years. Our heartfelt thanks go to our founder, the late Chögyal Namkhai Norbu. We would also like to express our gratitude to Dr Nathan Hill (SOAS) for his generous and untiring commitment and to the many sup- porters, volunteers and donors who graciously share their time, skills and resouces to help the Shang Shung Institute UK (SSIUK) fulfill its mission to preserve, diffuse and promote Tibetan culture throu- ghout the world. In particular, we would like to give thanks and pay our respects to the late Dominic Kennedy and Judith Allan who both played pivotal roles in the establishment of the Institute here in the UK. The SSIUK is a nonprofit organisation that relies on your support to continue and develop. We hope that this report serves to inspire you, and we would like to invite you to actively participate in our work through donations, sponsorship and legacies. You can see details of how you may do this on the last page of this booklet. With our very best wishes, Julia Lawless - International Director of Tibetan Culture Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Source 10:10 Kopi
    Back to Source Journeying Tibet 22th of April to the 11th of May 2019 Back to Source Journeying Tibet 22th of April to the 11th of May 2019 Yamdrok Lake This is an invitation to a rare and fantastic journey, into one of the most important and deep spirituel cultures, in the world – the ancient Tibetan culture. Monastory of Ganden Journeying Tibet 22th of April to the 11th of May 2019 The Invitation The culture on the top of the Everything experienced in a world – is a culture that for human life, is experienced many years have lived an through one self and witnessed isolated life – it is going deep from the consciousness through into the very core of human and awareness – that’s the individual beyond human experiences. journey. It is also an invitation into Together, we travel on our own spirituality - exploring the only individual journey. This spirituality there is – your own. togetherness gives everyone support and courage to accept This journey will day by day all the gifts, that Tibetan culture lead you deeper and deeper into has to offer. the unknown By doing this things starts to By accepting this invitation you build up and our common will be a part of a group that journey becomes the vehicle for will be traveling together, on this deeper and higher experiences, 21 days journey and possible transformations. - a journey that might be, the journey of your life Monastory of Sera Journeying Tibet 22th of April to the 11th of May 2019 The journey This is fantastic ! Fantastic because of the beauty By connecting with this of the culture – fantastic environment and such a deep because of the energy ruling on tradition for energy work, as the the different places.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SECURITISATION of TIBETAN BUDDHISM in COMMUNIST CHINA Abstract
    ПОЛИТИКОЛОГИЈА РЕЛИГИЈЕ бр. 2/2012 год VI • POLITICS AND RELIGION • POLITOLOGIE DES RELIGIONS • Nº 2/2012 Vol. VI ___________________________________________________________________________ Tsering Topgyal 1 Прегледни рад Royal Holloway University of London UDK: 243.4:323(510)”1949/...” United Kingdom THE SECURITISATION OF TIBETAN BUDDHISM IN COMMUNIST CHINA Abstract This article examines the troubled relationship between Tibetan Buddhism and the Chinese state since 1949. In the history of this relationship, a cyclical pattern of Chinese attempts, both violently assimilative and subtly corrosive, to control Tibetan Buddhism and a multifaceted Tibetan resistance to defend their religious heritage, will be revealed. This article will develop a security-based logic for that cyclical dynamic. For these purposes, a two-level analytical framework will be applied. First, the framework of the insecurity dilemma will be used to draw the broad outlines of the historical cycles of repression and resistance. However, the insecurity dilemma does not look inside the concept of security and it is not helpful to establish how Tibetan Buddhism became a security issue in the first place and continues to retain that status. The theory of securitisation is best suited to perform this analytical task. As such, the cycles of Chinese repression and Tibetan resistance fundamentally originate from the incessant securitisation of Tibetan Buddhism by the Chinese state and its apparatchiks. The paper also considers the why, how, and who of this securitisation, setting the stage for a future research project taking up the analytical effort to study the why, how and who of a potential desecuritisation of all things Tibetan, including Tibetan Buddhism, and its benefits for resolving the protracted Sino- Tibetan conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Tibet and China: History, Insurgency, and Beyond
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Calhoun, Institutional Archive of the Naval Postgraduate School Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 2003-06 Tibet and China: history, insurgency, and beyond Barton, Philip J. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL Monterey, California THESIS TIBET AND CHINA: HISTORY, INSURGENCY, AND BEYOND by Philip J. Barton June 2003 Thesis Advisor: Anna Simons Second Reader: David C. Tucker Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED June 2003 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE: Tibet and China: History, Insurgency, and Beyond 5. FUNDING NUMBERS 6. AUTHOR(S) Philip J. Barton 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING Naval Postgraduate School ORGANIZATION REPORT Monterey, CA 93943-5000 NUMBER 9. SPONSORING /MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tibetan Nonviolent Struggle: a Strategic and Historical Analysis
    ICNC MONOGRAPH SERIES The Tibetan Nonviolent Struggle: A Strategic and Historical Analysis Tenzin Dorjee ICNC MONOGRAPH SERIES Cover photos: (l) John Ackerly, 1987, (r) Invisible Tibet Blog SERIES EDITOR: Maciej Bartkowski John Ackerly’s photo of the first major demonstration in Lhasa in 1987 CONTACT: [email protected] became an emblem for the Tibet movement. The monk Jampa Tenzin, who is being lifted by fellow protesters, had just rushed into a burning VOLUME EDITORS: Hardy Merriman, Amber French, police station to rescue Tibetan detainees. With his arms charred by the Cassandra Balfour flames, he falls in and out of consciousness even as he leads the crowd CONTACT: [email protected] in chanting pro-independence slogans. The photographer John Ackerly Other volumes in this series: became a Tibet advocate and eventually President of the International Campaign for Tibet (1999 to 2009). To read more about John Ackerly’s The Power of Staying Put: Nonviolent Resistance experience in Tibet, see his book co-authored by Blake Kerr, Sky Burial: against Armed Groups in Colombia, Juan Masullo An Eyewitness Account of China’s Brutal Crackdown in Tibet. (2015) Invisible Tibet Blog’s photo was taken during the 2008 Tibetan uprising, The Maldives Democracy Experience (2008-13): when Tibetans across the three historical provinces of Tibet rose up From Authoritarianism to Democracy and Back, to protest Chinese rule. The protests began on March 10, 2008, a few Velezinee Aishath (2015) months ahead of the Beijing Olympic Games, and quickly became the largest, most sustained nonviolent movement Tibet has witnessed. Published by the International Center on Nonviolent Conflict The designations used and material presented in this publication do P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • “Little Tibet” with “Little Mecca”: Religion, Ethnicity and Social Change on the Sino-Tibetan Borderland (China)
    “LITTLE TIBET” WITH “LITTLE MECCA”: RELIGION, ETHNICITY AND SOCIAL CHANGE ON THE SINO-TIBETAN BORDERLAND (CHINA) A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Yinong Zhang August 2009 © 2009 Yinong Zhang “LITTLE TIBET” WITH “LITTLE MECCA”: RELIGION, ETHNICITY AND SOCIAL CHANGE ON THE SINO-TIBETAN BORDERLAND (CHINA) Yinong Zhang, Ph. D. Cornell University 2009 This dissertation examines the complexity of religious and ethnic diversity in the context of contemporary China. Based on my two years of ethnographic fieldwork in Taktsang Lhamo (Ch: Langmusi) of southern Gansu province, I investigate the ethnic and religious revival since the Chinese political relaxation in the 1980s in two local communities: one is the salient Tibetan Buddhist revival represented by the rebuilding of the local monastery, the revitalization of religious and folk ceremonies, and the rising attention from the tourists; the other is the almost invisible Islamic revival among the Chinese Muslims (Hui) who have inhabited in this Tibetan land for centuries. Distinctive when compared to their Tibetan counterpart, the most noticeable phenomenon in the local Hui revival is a revitalization of Hui entrepreneurship, which is represented by the dominant Hui restaurants, shops, hotels, and bus lines. As I show in my dissertation both the Tibetan monastic ceremonies and Hui entrepreneurship are the intrinsic part of local ethnoreligious revival. Moreover these seemingly unrelated phenomena are in fact closely related and reflect the modern Chinese nation-building as well as the influences from an increasingly globalized and government directed Chinese market.
    [Show full text]