Effects of Fragmentation and Degradation of Kenyan Rainforests

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Effects of Fragmentation and Degradation of Kenyan Rainforests Effects of fragmentation and degradation of an afrotropical rain forest on the diversity structure of leaf beetle communities (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades (Dr. rer. nat.) der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn vorgelegt von Wolfram M. Freund aus Buenos Aires / Argentinien Bonn 2004 Angefertigt mit Genehmigung der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn 1. Referent: Prof. Dr. Johann Wolfgang Wägele 2. Referent: Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Böhme Tag der Promotion: 18.02.2005 Diese Dissertation ist auf dem Hochschulschriftenserver der ULB Bonn http://hss.ulb.uni-bonn.de/diss_online elektronisch publiziert. Erscheinungsjahr: 2005 Für meinen geliebten Vater, Hans Christian Freund (*1933 − †1990) Chochote chaweza kutukea – Anything can happen anytime Kenianisches Sprichwort 1 Index Index Index ...............................................................................................................................1 1. Introduction................................................................................................................3 1.1. Evolution of African forests ...................................................................................3 1.2. How many species are there?...............................................................................5 1.3. Stochasticity versus deterministic equilibrium models...........................................7 1.4. Objectives .............................................................................................................8 2. Material and methods..............................................................................................11 2.1. Study time and area............................................................................................11 2.2. Canopy dwelling arthropods collected by insecticidal tree fogging .....................16 2.2.1. Sampling procedure .....................................................................................17 2.2.2. Trees investigated ........................................................................................18 2.2.3. Efficiency of the fogging technique...............................................................20 2.3. Evaluation of fogging experiments ......................................................................21 2.3.1. Sample sorting..............................................................................................21 2.3.2. Beetle morpho-types and beetle species......................................................21 2.3.3. Allocation to feeding guilds...........................................................................23 2.4. Diversity measures..............................................................................................23 2.4.1. Alpha-diversity..............................................................................................24 2.4.2. Beta-diversity................................................................................................28 2.5. Statistical approach and multivariate analysis.....................................................29 2.5.1. Statistics .......................................................................................................29 2.5.2. Multivariate analysis .....................................................................................29 3. Results......................................................................................................................31 3.1. Distribution patterns of arthropods ......................................................................32 3.1.1. Rainy season X. 2001 ..................................................................................32 3.1.2. Rainy season X. 2002 ..................................................................................35 3.1.3. Dry season I. 2002 .......................................................................................38 3.1.4. Dry season I. 2003 .......................................................................................40 3.2. Distribution patterns and diversity of beetles.......................................................43 3.2.1. Diversity at different forest sites....................................................................44 3.2.2. Diversity at different seasons .......................................................................45 3.2.3. Feeding guilds ..............................................................................................46 3.2.3.1. Predacious beetles ................................................................................47 2 Index 3.2.3.2. Mycetophagous beetles ........................................................................ 53 3.2.3.3. Chrysomelidae ...................................................................................... 59 3.2.3.4. Weevils (Curculionidae and Apionidae) ................................................ 65 4. Discussion............................................................................................................... 72 4.1. Distribution patterns and seasonality of non-beetle arthropods.......................... 72 4.2. Distribution patterns and seasonality of beetles ................................................. 78 4.3. Critical considerations on the methodology........................................................ 82 4.4. Herbivory, host plant specificity and global diversity .......................................... 83 4.5. Does fragmentation of forests influence beetle communities? ........................... 89 5. Summary ................................................................................................................100 6. References .............................................................................................................105 Appendix ....................................................................................................................128 Introduction 3 1. Introduction Tropical rain forests, which cover only six to seven per cent of the earth’s landmass, deserve our particular attention and protection, since they probably contain 50 % of the global biodiversity (Myers 1979, Wilson 1988, Linsenmair 1990, Bierregaard et al. 2001). The loss of these ‘biodiversity hotspots’ (Myers 1988, Barthlott et al. 1999, Myers et al. 2000) would mean extinction of a tremendous number of species, although they can receive protection with a comparative low expenditure of money and staff. Despite strong efforts of scientists and politicians, many of these regions are highly endangered. With losses of more than five million hectares per year, accounting for 56 % of the global reduction in forest cover (FAO 2003), African forests are among the most threatened ecosystems worldwide (Achard et al. 2002, Groombridge & Jenkins 2002). East African forests are particularly diverse and endangered but are still little-known ecosystems. Distributed over a highly variable landscape dominated by savannas and thorn bushes, these forests are outstandingly species rich as well as centres of endemism (Fjeldsa & Lovett 1997). They play an important role as cultural heritages and are a traditionally and intensively used resource for the local populations (UNEP 2002). With an increase of the human population in East Africa throughout the last decades, the pressure on biodiversity largely increased and the use of the forest ecosystems is far from being sustainable. Generally, there is no doubt on a local and governmental level that at least core areas of tropical forests need to be maintained and conserved for future generations. 1.1. Evolution of African forests It has been suggested that African forests once contained a more diverse fauna and flora, but suffered from extinction processes at times of severe climate changes, especially during dry phases of the Quaternary (Stein & Sarnthein 1984). The forest cover in tropical Africa was strongly affected by climate changes during the Holocene and was at its minimum during the cooler and more arid periods of the ice ages (Hamilton 1992). At this time they were confined to a number of relatively small refugia, isolated from each other, at orographically favoured places, e.g. the mountains of Kenya (Hamilton 1992). Rain forest occurred only at specific altitudes in these mountains, because both open country and high mountain regions became too dry and cold, respectively. During warmer and wetter conditions lowland forest cover could spread from those refugia. The maximum postglacial spread of forests in tropical Africa was attained some thousand years after 10000 BP (before present). Comparisons of pollen from deep-sea cores (e.g. van Campo et al. 1982) and meteorological models of 4 Introduction climatic change (Rossignol-Strick 1983) revealed that most, though not all, ice ages resulted in dry periods in tropical Africa, characterised by forest reduction (for climatic change see also Thompson et al. 2002). The severity of the arid periods increased during the Quaternary (Stein & Sarnthein 1984) and a period of generally drier climatic conditions started about 4000 years ago (Hamilton 1992, Thompson et al. 2002). During interglacial periods wetter conditions returned, correlated with forest expansion. The alternate advances and retreats throughout the last millennia led to a natural fragmentation of the forests. This state of natural forest reduction
Recommended publications
  • Linyphiid Spiders (Araneae, Linyphiidae) from African Forest Canopies
    67…………………………………… ARTÍCULO: Linyphiid Spiders (Araneae, Linyphiidae) from African forest canopies Rimma R. Seyfulina & Domir De Bakker ARTÍCULO: Linyphiid Spiders (Araneae, Linyphiidae) from African forest canopies Rimma R. Seyfulina Abstract Africa’s spider canopy fauna is still not very well known. This article reports on Department of Invertebrate Zoology, linyphiid spiders (Araneae, Linyphiidae) from several localities across tropical Faculty of Biology, Africa obtained by canopy fogging (pyrethrum knockdown). We studied the Lomonosov Moscow State University, species composition and diversity, the dominant structure, and the abundance of Leninskie Gory, Moscow 119991 linyphiid spiders. Results show a large diversity and a very high number of new Russia. species (about 75%). The canopy fauna has a large number of species (at least e-mail: [email protected] 25%) that are typical for the canopy. The most speciose genus in the African forest tree crowns is Mecynidis Simon, 1894. Linyphiid spiders from the canopy Domir De Bakker were more abundant during the dry season in secondary and primary forests, but in swamp forests they were more numerous during the wet season. Differences Section of Invertebrates non-insects, between sites, despite being sampled with a different intensity, were largely de- Royal Museum for Central Africa, pendent on geographic location. It is clear from our research that canopies can Leuvensesteenweg 13, B-3080 harbour a very large diversity of linyphiid spiders and that future research is in- Tervuren, Belgium. dispensable for understanding the underlying patterns of distribution. Em: [email protected] Key words: Arachnida, Araneae, Linyphiidae, spiders, Africa, forest, canopy fogging. Revista Ibérica de Aracnología ISSN: 1576 - 9518.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited in Chrysomela from 1979 to 2003 Newsletters 1 Through 42
    Literature on the Chrysomelidae From CHRYSOMELA Newsletter, numbers 1-42 October 1979 through June 2003 (2,852 citations) Terry N. Seeno, Past Editor The following citations appeared in the CHRYSOMELA process and rechecked for accuracy, the list undoubtedly newsletter beginning with the first issue published in 1979. contains errors. Revisions will be numbered sequentially. Because the literature on leaf beetles is so expansive, Adobe InDesign 2.0 was used to prepare and distill these citations focus mainly on biosystematic references. the list into a PDF file, which is searchable using standard They were taken directly from the publication, reprint, or search procedures. If you want to add to the literature in author’s notes and not copied from other bibliographies. this bibliography, please contact the newsletter editor. All Even though great care was taken during the data entering contributors will be acknowledged. Abdullah, M. and A. Abdullah. 1968. Phyllobrotica decorata DuPortei, Cassidinae) em condições de laboratório. Rev. Bras. Entomol. 30(1): a new sub-species of the Galerucinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) with 105-113, 7 figs., 2 tabs. a review of the species of Phyllobrotica in the Lyman Museum Collec- tion. Entomol. Mon. Mag. 104(1244-1246):4-9, 32 figs. Alegre, C. and E. Petitpierre. 1982. Chromosomal findings on eight species of European Cryptocephalus. Experientia 38:774-775, 11 figs. Abdullah, M. and A. Abdullah. 1969. Abnormal elytra, wings and other structures in a female Trirhabda virgata (Chrysomelidae) with a Alegre, C. and E. Petitpierre. 1984. Karyotypic Analyses in Four summary of similar teratological observations in the Coleoptera. Dtsch. Species of Hispinae (Col.: Chrysomelidae).
    [Show full text]
  • Revision of Oriental Monolepta and Related Groups of Leaf Beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae)
    Revision of Oriental Monolepta and related groups of leaf beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae) Dissertation Zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften des Fachbereich 3: Mathematik/Naturwissenschaften der Universität Koblenz-Landau vorgelegt am. 09. März 2012 von Izfa Riza Binti Hazmi geb. am 27. Mai 1983 in Malaysia Referent: Prof. Dr. Thomas Wagner Koreferent: Prof. Dr. Bernhard Misof I Table of contents Table of contents II Foreword and Acknowledgements III Introduction 1 Curriculum vitae 15 Declaration 17 Appendices Appendix 1 Revalidation and revision of Ochralea Clark, 1865 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae) from the Oriental Region Appendix 2 Revision of Arcastes Baly, 1865 from the Oriental region (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae) Appendix 3 Rubrarcastes gen. nov., a new group of Oriental galerucine leaf beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae, Galerucinae) Appendix 4 Revision of Neolepta Jacoby, 1884 and related galerucines from the Oriental region, including description of two new genera (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae) Appendix 5 Revision of Monolepta Chevrolat, 1837 from the Sundaland area (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae) II Foreword and Acknowledgements Bismillahirrahmanirrahim.. I have never thought of staying abroad for quite some years. It was all started when I got a position to be a tutor of Insect Systematic in the Centre of Environmental Science and Natural Resources, Faculty of Science and Technology, the National University of Malaysia. Being that time, I was not sure what am I going to do for the next few years, but one thing that I knew is that I have to further my doctorate study. Mohamed Salleh Mohamed Said a former Professor and taxonomist who were actively worked on Chrysomelidae of Malaysia and Indonesia have met me one day.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter Dedicated to Information About the Chrysomelidae Report No
    CHRYSOMELA newsletter Dedicated to information about the Chrysomelidae Report No. 53 November 2011 Inside This Issue ECE Leaf Beetle Symposium 2- Editor’s page, submissions Budapest, Hungary, 2010 2- New Italian journal international meetings 3- ECE Leaf beetle symposium 5- Visit to Paris museum 7- In memoriam - Sandro Ruffo 9- Chrysomelid questionnaire 10- Padre Moure and young scientists 10- In Memoriam - Renato Contin Marinoni 11- Memories of Padre Moure 12- Research on Chrysomelidae volume 3 12 - Beutelsbach meeting, Germany 2010 13- First visit to USNM 14- Spawn of Wilcox: Shawn Clark 16- Central European chryso meeting 17- New Literature 19- New journal announcement 23- E-mail list Fig. 1. The chrysomelid group meets for fine dining on Research Activities Hungarian cuisine, European Congress of Entomology (story, page 3) Jose Lencina (Spain), Universidad de Murcia, is studying systematics and biogeography of Chrysomelidae and the Iberian Peninsula fauna. Visit to Paris Museum Matteo Montagna (Italy) completed his degree in AgroEnvironmental Science, University of Milan (2010; Mentors Davide Sassi and Renato Regalin) and is seeking Ph.D. positions. He studies taxonomy, biogeography and molecular systematics of Coleoptera, particularly Chrysomelidae. Current works include an ecological study of Chrysomelidae around lakes in the Alta Brianza (Como/ Lecco, Lombardia), the taxonomy of Italian’s species of Galeruca, a Cerambycidae catalogue of Val Camonica, and molecular techniques in Prof. Bandi’s lab, Milan. Ghazala Rizvi (Pakistan) studies chrysomelid beetles associated with fruit trees in Pakistan, including Azad Kashmir (northern areas). He is paraticularly interested in Galerucinae, but writes widely on many things including mangroves and ants. Haruki Suenaga (Japan), a student in the Entomo- logical Laboratory, Ehime Univ, is studying the taxonomy Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • A Molecular and Morphological Phylogenetic Analysis of Afrotropical Monolepta Species and Related Galerucinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)
    Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny 66 (1) 3 – 17 © Museum für Tierkunde Dresden, eISSN 1864-8312 A Molecular and Morphological Phylogenetic Analysis of Afrotropical Monolepta Species and Related Galerucinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) HEIDI STAPEL 1, BERNHARD MISOF 2 & THOMAS WAGNER 3 * 1 Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig (ZFMK), Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany [[email protected]] 2 Biozentrum Grindel und Zoologisches Museum, Martin-Luther-King-Platz 3, 20146 Hamburg, Germany [[email protected]] 3 Universität Koblenz-Landau, Institut für Integrierte Naturwissenschaften – Biologie, Universitätsstr. 1, 56070 Koblenz, Germany [[email protected]] * Corresponding author (28th contribution to the taxonomy, phylogeny, and biogeography of Afrotropical Galerucinae) Received 3.i.2007, accepted 25.i.2008. Published online at www.arthropod-systematics.de on 30.vi.2008. > Abstract The phylogenetic status of Afrotropical galerucines was investigated with molecular and morphological analyses. The taxon sample analysed comprised 15 species within Monolepta, three within Afrocandezea, two each within Afrocrania and Barombiella and one Pseudocrania species; all were originally placed in “Monoleptites”. Further galerucines outside the “Monoleptites” are Diacantha sp., Exosoma polita, Exosoma sp., Galerudolphia tenuicornis, and Parasbecesta ruwensorica. The chrysomeline Linaeidea nubila was included as outgroup. 35 morphological characters including 16 characters on genital morphology were analysed. A 540 bp mitochondrial DNA NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1 (ND1) fragment and the entire second internal transcribed spacer region ITS2 (519–709 bp) of the nuclear ribosomal DNA were sequenced from 22 and 24 taxa, respectively. Both molecular data sets were characterized by a high average A-T content of 86.4% (ND1) and 62.7% (ITS2). Trees of separate and combined data sets were reconstructed with Maximum Parsimony (MP) and Maximum Likelihood (ML) approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Secondary Sexual Characteristics in the Galerucinae (Sensu Stricto)(Coleoptera:Chrysomelidae)
    International Scholarly Research Network ISRN Zoology Volume 2011, Article ID 328670, 60 pages doi:10.5402/2011/328670 Research Article Secondary Sexual Characteristics in the Galerucinae (Sensu Stricto)(Coleoptera:Chrysomelidae) M. S. Mohamedsaid1 and D. G. Furth2 1 48 Jalan SS 15/3A, Subang Jaya, Selangor 47500, Malaysia 2 National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA Correspondence should be addressed to M. S. Mohamedsaid, [email protected] Received 27 January 2011; Accepted 3 March 2011 Academic Editors: M. Kuntner and T. Miyata Copyright © 2011 M. S. Mohamedsaid and D. G. Furth. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. A list of 1298 species and 172 genera of Chrysomelidae from the subfamily Galerucinae (sensu stricto) with the males having at least one form of secondary sexual characteristic (SSC) is presented. The number of species amounts to 24% of the total Galerucinae presently known from all over the world—a very significant amount. The SSCs comprise various types of modified structures found on all parts of the body—head, thorax, and abdomen. They are not variable but species specific. Illustrations from selected 87 species that include 84 images and 15 line drawings showing various types of SSC are provided. The amazing array of SSCs from the Galerucinae offers a large and taxonomically diverse set of data that are not comparable with other subfamilies in the Chrysomelidae and may be useful in phylogenetic analysis of the family.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Galerucinae)
    Zootaxa 3881 (1): 049–062 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3881.1.4 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:AAE975C5-21FF-4CEF-85AE-B3C73D2A30DB Revision of the Afrotropical Pimentelia Laboissière, 1939 (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Galerucinae) HELMUT BOLZ & THOMAS WAGNER Institut für Integrierte Naturwissenschaft—Biologie, Universität Koblenz Landau, Universitätsstraße 1, D 56070 Koblenz. E-mails: [email protected]; thwagner@uni koblenz.de Abstract We redescribe two of the valid species of the Afrotropical galerucine genus Pimentelia Laboissière, 1939. This group forms a distinct monophyletic group, characterized by several external and genitalic characters. It is closer related to Ga- lerudolphia Hincks, 1949 and Neobarombiella Bolz & Wagner, 1912. The revision is based on the examination of 30 spec- imens from continental Africa, and contains two valid species: the type of the genus, Pimentelia kuanduensis Laboissière, 1939, and Pimentelia maculata (Jacoby, 1885) comb. nov. (= Sermyloides unifasciata Jacoby, 1900 syn. nov.). A further species originally described, Pimentelia ochracea Laboissière, 1939 is unknown to us, type material could not be found. Another species, Pimentelia hertigi (Laboissière, 1931), has to be transferred to another group since external characters show that it is not closely related to Pimentelia and does not belong to this genus. Pimentelia is described in detail, rede-
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Natural History Monolepta Chevrolat, , the Most
    This article was downloaded by: [University of Bath] On: 13 February 2014, At: 12:05 Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Journal of Natural History Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tnah20 Monolepta Chevrolat, , the most speciose galerucine taxon: redescription of the type species Monolepta bioculata (Fabricius, ) and key to related genera from (Chrysomelidae, Coleoptera) Thomas Wagner a a Universität Koblenz‐Landau , Institut für Integrierte Naturwissenschaften – Biologie , Koblenz, Germany Published online: 16 Mar 2007. To cite this article: Thomas Wagner (2007) Monolepta Chevrolat, , the most speciose galerucine taxon: redescription of the type species Monolepta bioculata (Fabricius, ) and key to related genera from (Chrysomelidae, Coleoptera) , Journal of Natural History, 41:1-4, 81-100, DOI: 10.1080/00222930601127384 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222930601127384 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guide to the Moist Forest Trees of Tanzania
    Field Guide to the Moist Forest Trees of Tanzania Jon C. Lovett, Chris K. Ruffo & Roy E. Gereau Illustrations – Line Sørensen & Jilly Lovett Formatting and distribution maps – James Taplin 1 Introduction This field guide started life as a file card index prepared by Jon Lovett during field work in Tanzania from 1979 to 1992. The text derived from the original index was substantially added to by the students Jette Raal Hansen, Karin Sørig Hougaard, Vibeke Hørlyck, Peter Høst, Kristian Mikkelsen, Rosa, Josefine, Henry Ndangalasi and Ludovick Uronu at the Botanical Museum of Copenhagen during training excercises in 1994. Chris Ruffo added information on local names and uses and Roy Gereau checked, uptaked and edited the nomenclature and included species missing from the original list. The participation of Chris Ruffo was supported by the DANIDA Tree Seed Centre. Moist forests are defined here as evergreen and semi-deciduous closed canopy vegetation that ranges from lowland groundwater and riverine forests to elfin mist forests on the tops of high mountains. A large tree is defined as being greater than 10 m or 20cm diameter at breast height. The diameter measurement is included so that stunted trees in cold high elevation forests are covered. There are a great many trees smaller than 10 m in height, particularly in the family Rubiaceae. The height limit thus constrains the number of species included. A few species known only from the forests of eastern Kenya are included. This is to ensure full coverage of large trees from the Eastern Arc and Coastal Forest biodiversity “hotspot”. The book “Kenya Trees Shrubs and Lianas” by Henk Beentje contains a full coverage of the Kenyan species.
    [Show full text]
  • Dogwood Anthracnose Caused by Discula Destructiva on Cornus Spp
    Dogwood Anthracnose Caused by Discula destructiva on Cornus spp. in Canada by Mihaela Stanescu A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Environmental Biology Guelph, Ontario, Canada © Mihaela Stanescu, December, 2013 ABSTRACT DOGWOOD ANTHRACNOSE CAUSED BY DISCULA DESTRUCTIVA ON CORNUS SPP. IN CANADA Mihaela Stanescu, Advisor: University of Guelph, 2013 Professor T. Hsiang The most important fungal disease of dogwoods in North America is anthracnose caused by Discula destructiva. This disease affects Cornus florida (flowering dogwood), C. nuttallii (Pacific dogwood), and C. kousa (kousa dogwood). It has not been well studied in Ontario nor anywhere in Canada. In this study, over 2,500 fungal isolates were obtained from symptomatic samples of C. alba, C. alternifolia, C. amomum, C. kousa, C. florida, C. nuttallii, C. racemosa and C. sericea. To help distinguish between foliar symptoms of different etiologies, a “Dogwood Disease Symptom Guide” was produced. Isolates were divided into 13 fungal morphotypes, of which D. destructiva accounted for 39% of all isolates. Pathogenicity testing of Discula destructiva on C. florida satisfied Koch’s postulates, and this fungus was confirmed as the causal agent of dogwood anthracnose in southwestern Ontario (C. florida) and southwestern British Columbia (C. nuttallii). Wounds and leaf trichomes may provide a point of entry and help the pathogen survive endophytically without producing symptoms on “non-host” plants such as oak, maple and pear. The pathogen was found to survive for over 12 weeks at -20 °C, and the optimal growth temperature was found to be between 20-25 °C, but temperatures as high as 30 °C inhibited the growth, and the fungus died after one week incubation at 40 °C.
    [Show full text]
  • Quo Vadis Biodiversity? Species Richness Following Twenty Years of Taxonomic Revisions on Afrotropical Galerucinae S
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 720:Quo 131–137 vadis (2017)biodiversity? Species richness following twenty years of taxonomic revisions... 131 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.720.14011 DATA PAPER http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Quo vadis biodiversity? Species richness following twenty years of taxonomic revisions on Afrotropical Galerucinae s. str. (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae)1,2 Thomas Wagner1 1 Universität Koblenz-Landau, Institut für Integrierte Naturwissenschaften – Biologie, Universitätsstr. 1, D-56070 Koblenz, Germany Corresponding author: Thomas Wagner ([email protected]) Academic editor: C. Chaboo | Received 6 June 2017 | Accepted 26 September 2017 | Published 11 December 2017 http://zoobank.org/34E3F702-4F76-43F8-A996-D79485A5B681 Citation: Wagner T (2017) Quo vadis biodiversity? Species richness following twenty years of taxonomic revisions on Afrotropical Galerucinae s. str. (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). In: Chaboo CS, Schmitt M (Eds) Research on Chrysomelidae 7. ZooKeys 720: 131–137. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.720.14011 Abstract Galerucinae is one of the most species-rich leaf beetle group with its greatest diversity occurring in tropical forests. There are 1680 nominal species of Afrotropical Galerucinae s. str. (without Alticini) described. Considering global diversity estimations, many unknown species can be presumed. Several taxa tradition- ally placed in “Monoleptites”, have been revised in the last twenty years. To date 259 species have been re- examined, revealing in 139 valid species and 120 mainly newly recognized synonyms. This large number of synonyms can mainly be ascribed to highly variable colour patterns, a typical character used for the identification of many chrysomelid species. Genitalic structures and molecular work can support a more precise allocation to species.
    [Show full text]
  • Chrysomela 42R1-FINAL
    CHRYSOMELA newsletter Dedicated to information about the Chrysomelidae Report No. 42 June 2003 INSIDE THIS ISSUE Eastern Neck National Wildlife Refuge May 16-18, 2003 2- Editor’s Page The Mid-Atlantic States Collecting Trip 2- NMNH Chrysomelid Collection 2- Historical Photo—First ICS 3- The Passing of Old Friends 3- Maternal Care in Cassidines 3- The Bordon Collection 3- Thanks for 20 Years of Service 4- New Light on Hybosinota 5- The Bergeal's at Smithsonian 5- What izit? 6- The 14th ESSA Congress 6- The Mid-Atlantic States Trip 7- Chrysomelidae of Lord Howe Is. 8- Philadelphia's ANS Collection 9- Cryptocephaline Stalked Eggs 9- Request for Live Material 10- Literature Requests 10- Specimen Requests 11- Recent Chrysomelid Literature Sunday, May 18, 2003, following two days of collecting 18- Email & Telephone List from left to right— Charlie Staines, Susan Staines, Dave Furth, Lijie Zhang, Eric 22- Call for Papers Smith, Barbara Bergel, Alexander Konstantinov, Kira Zhaurova, Michel Bergal, 22- Chrysomela Questionnaire Catherine Duckett, and Warren Steiner (photographs: Charlie Cambell) (see story page 6) Research Activities and Interests Wolfgang Baese (Wittenberg) cur- of the Palearctic Coleoptera (Eds.: I. Jiri Brokes (Litomysl) is working rently working the faunistics and biol- Löbl & A. Smetana). Also, continuing on the Donaciinae of Central Europe; ogy of the middle-European species of to work on the Chrysomelid Fauna of also, continuing work on Orsodacninae, the subfamily Donaciinae. Central Europe (Th. M. Schmitt, Admin- Criocerinae, Clytrinae, Cryptocephali- Judith X. Becerra (Tucson) is istrator). nae, and Chrysomelinae of the Palearctic working on plant-insect interactions Jan Bezdek (Brno) is working on the region.
    [Show full text]