DOCSLIB.ORG

Requirements Baseline Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Requirements Baseline Document ESA DUE DIVERSITY II Supporting the Convention on Biological Diversity Requirements Baseline Document Version 4.1 2015-01-20 Requirements Baseline Document, Version 4.1 20 January 2015 Change Log Version Date Change Originator(s) 1 06.05.2013 Initial Version Per Wramner, Carsten Brockmann, Diversity Team 2 iss.1 21.06.2013 Section 2.3 “User Contacts” inserted Per Wramner, Carsten Brockmann, Diversity Team Section 5.1. “Preliminary Analysis of the Questionnaires” added Annex 15 Filled User Questionnaires added 2 iss.1.1 24.06.2013 Section 5.1 updated Per Wramner Restructuring of section 5 C. Brockmann 3 draft 2 26.09.2013 Section 5 updated after UCM Per Wramner, C. Brockmann Section 6.6 updated after UCM Annex 16 UCM added Annexes 13 and 14 Returned Questionnaires amended with 2 more questionnaires 3 draft 3 3.12.2013 Section 5.2 amended Per Wramner 9.12.2013 Section 5.3.1 added U. Gangkofner 3.0 10.12.2013 Final review by PW and CD; submission to ESA Wramner, Brockmann 4 draft 1 10.12.2014 Section 5 updated, 5.2.2, 5.3.1 and Annex 17-18 added Wramner, Brockmann, Philipson, Thulin, Odermatt 4 draft 2 20.01.2015 Section 5.3.2 updated Gangkofner, Philipson, Thulin 2 Requirements Baseline Document, Version 4.1 20 January 2015 Table of Contents 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 7 2 The Diversity II Users ...................................................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Analysis of Users .................................................................................................................................... 8 2.1.1 Determination of User types ............................................................................................................. 8 2.1.2 The role of CBD .................................................................................................................................. 8 2.2 User organisations and end-use of Diversity II products ....................................................................... 9 2.2.1 User descriptions ............................................................................................................................... 9 2.2.2 User applications and reporting requirements ................................................................................. 9 2.2.3 User contacts ..................................................................................................................................... 9 3 Analyses of relevant CBD documents ........................................................................................................... 13 3.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 13 3.2 Background .......................................................................................................................................... 13 3.3 GBO-3 .................................................................................................................................................. 13 3.4 The CBD PoW on Biological Diversity of Inland Water Ecosystems ..................................................... 15 3.4.1 Conclusions in summary .................................................................................................................. 17 3.5 The CBD PoW on Biological Diversity of Dry and Sub-Humid Lands .................................................... 18 3.5.1 Conclusions in summary .................................................................................................................. 23 3.6 The CBD Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011 – 2020 .......................................................................... 23 3.6.1 Implementation of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011 – 2020 ............................................... 24 3.7 Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) ............ 25 3.7.1 Linkages between the IPBES and the Diversity II Project ................................................................ 26 4 Biodiversity Indicators – a tool to monitor the implementation of the CBD Strategic Plan 2011 – 2020 .... 28 4.1 Background .......................................................................................................................................... 28 4.2 Development of biodiversity indicators within the context of CBD .................................................... 29 4.2.1 Conclusions in summary .................................................................................................................. 31 4.3 The potential of EO to provide data for indicators that can be used to monitor the implementation of the Aichi Targets ............................................................................................................................................... 31 4.3.1 Aichi Targets of relevance to the Diversity II Project ...................................................................... 32 4.3.2 Contribution of EO data to the monitoring of how the Aichi Targets are met ............................... 34 5 User Requirements ....................................................................................................................................... 48 5.1 Analysis of the Questionnaires ............................................................................................................ 48 5.1.1 Inland Waters .................................................................................................................................. 48 5.1.2 Drylands .......................................................................................................................................... 50 5.2 User Consultation Meetings ................................................................................................................ 51 5.2.1 User Consultation Meeting I ........................................................................................................... 51 5.2.2 User Consultation Meeting II – Inland Waters ................................................................................ 58 5.2.3 User Consultation Meeting III - Drylands ........................................................................................ 62 5.3 Synthesis of User Requirements .......................................................................................................... 71 5.3.1 Second order indicators - Inland waters ......................................................................................... 71 5.3.2 Second order indicators - Drylands ................................................................................................. 72 3 Requirements Baseline Document, Version 4.1 20 January 2015 5.3.3 User Requirements Derived from Additional Discussions and Current Developments .................. 73 6 Biodiversity Hotspots and Global Bioregionalization – Requirements on Site Selection ............................. 74 6.1 The concept of Biodiversity Hotspots .................................................................................................. 74 6.2 Biodiversity Hotspots sensu stricto ..................................................................................................... 75 6.3 Global Ecoregions ............................................................................................................................... 76 6.4 Key Biodiversity Areas ......................................................................................................................... 78 6.5 Global bioregionalization ..................................................................................................................... 81 6.5.1 Freshwater Ecoregions of the World............................................................................................... 81 6.5.2 Marine Ecoregions of the World ..................................................................................................... 82 6.5.3 Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World ................................................................................................ 82 6.6 Conclusions .......................................................................................................................................... 82 Annex 1 Excerpt from Biodiversity Work Programme .......................................................................................... 84 Annex 2 Relationships between biodiversity and the water cycle........................................................................ 89 Annex 3 Status and Trends of Biodiversity of Dry and Sub-Humid Lands ............................................................. 90 Annex 4 Section IV of Strategic Plan ..................................................................................................................... 94 Annex 5 Exec Summary of Adequacy of Biodiversity ............................................................................................ 97 Annex 6 Excerpts from the ”Critical review …” ..................................................................................................... 98 Annex 7 Possible Indicators for the Aichi Biodiversity Targets ........................................................................... 101 Annex 8 INDICATORS FOR
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Forests Warranting Further Consideration As Potential World
    Forest Protected Areas Warranting Further Consideration as Potential WH Forest Sites: Summaries from Various and Thematic Regional Analyses (Compendium produced by Marc Patry, for the proceedings of the 2nd World Heritage Forest meeting, held at Nancy, France, March 11-13, 2005) Four separate initiatives have been carried out in the past 10 years in an effort to help guide the process of identifying and nominating new WH Forest sites. The first, carried out by Thorsell and Sigaty (1997), addresses forests worldwide, and was developed based on the authors’ shared knowledge of protected forests worldwide. The second focuses exclusively on tropical forests and was assembled by the participants at the 1998 WH Forest meeting in Berastagi, Indonesia (CIFOR, 1999). A third initiative consists of potential boreal forest sites developed by the participants to an expert meeting on boreal forests, held in St. Petersberg in 2003. Finally, a fourth, carried out jointly between UNEP and IUCN applied a more systematic approach (IUCN, 2004). Though aiming at narrowing the field of potential candidate sites, these initiatives do not automatically imply that all of the listed forest areas would meet the criteria for inscription on the WH List, and conversely, nor do they imply that any site left off the list would not meet these criteria. Since these lists were developed, several of the proposed sites have been inscribed on the WH List, while others have been the subject of nominations, but were not inscribed, for various reasons. The lists below are reproduced here in an effort to facilitate access to this information and to guide future nomination initiatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the World Heritage Network: Biogeography, Habitats and Biodiversity
    Review of the World Heritage Network: Biogeography, Habitats and Biodiversity FINAL DRAFT A Contribution to the Global Strategy for World Heritage Natural Sites IUCN UHESCQ © 7?n? Work) Coronation u n an UNEP WCMC Review of the World Heritage Network: Biogeography, Habitats and Biodiversity Chris Magin and Stuart Chape UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre IUCN - The World Conservation Union 2004 The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP, UNEP-WCMC, IUCN and the UNESCO World Heritage Centre concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. UNEP-WCMC or its collaborators have obtained base data from documented sources believed to be reliable and made all reasonable efforts to ensure the accuracy of the data. UNEP-WCMC does not warrant the accuracy or reliability of the base data and excludes all conditions, warranties, undertakings and terms express or implied whether by statute, common law, trade usage, course of dealings or otherwise (including the fitness of the data for its intended use) to the fullest extent permitted by law. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of UNEP, UNEP-WCMC, IUCN and UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Acknowledgements The authors express their sincere appreciation to the following people for their valuable input to this project: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre John Ady for extracting data from 172 World Heritage Site Sheets; Dr Igor Lysenko and Simon Blyth for undertaking the GIS analysis; Dr Mark Spalding for reviewing the data; Matt Doughty, Lucy Fish, Melanie Mason and Corinna Ravilious for preparing the numerous maps.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Vertebrate and Invertebrate Diversity Patterns in an Andean-Amazon Basin: Implications for Conservation Efforts
    Neotropical Biodiversity ISSN: (Print) 2376-6808 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tneo20 Freshwater vertebrate and invertebrate diversity patterns in an Andean-Amazon basin: implications for conservation efforts Janeth Lessmann, Juan M. Guayasamin, Kayce L. Casner, Alexander S. Flecker, W. Chris Funk, Cameron K. Ghalambor, Brian A. Gill, Iván Jácome- Negrete, Boris C. Kondratieff, LeRoy N. Poff, José Schreckinger, Steven A. Thomas, Eduardo Toral-Contreras, Kelly R. Zamudio & Andrea C. Encalada To cite this article: Janeth Lessmann, Juan M. Guayasamin, Kayce L. Casner, Alexander S. Flecker, W. Chris Funk, Cameron K. Ghalambor, Brian A. Gill, Iván Jácome-Negrete, Boris C. Kondratieff, LeRoy N. Poff, José Schreckinger, Steven A. Thomas, Eduardo Toral-Contreras, Kelly R. Zamudio & Andrea C. Encalada (2016) Freshwater vertebrate and invertebrate diversity patterns in an Andean-Amazon basin: implications for conservation efforts, Neotropical Biodiversity, 2:1, 99-114, DOI: 10.1080/23766808.2016.1222189 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/23766808.2016.1222189 © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Informa View supplementary material UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 12 Sep 2016. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 3121 View related articles View Crossmark data Citing articles: 4 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tneo20 Neotropical Biodiversity, 2016 Vol. 2, No. 1, 99–114, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23766808.2016.1222189 Freshwater vertebrate and invertebrate diversity patterns in an Andean-Amazon basin: implications for conservation efforts Janeth Lessmanna,b,c,d* , Juan M.
    [Show full text]
  • FROM: Scientists Concerned for Yasuní National Park TO
    FROM: Scientists Concerned for Yasuní National Park TO: Ingeniero Lucio Gutiérrez President of the Republic of Ecuador Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva President of the Federative Republic of Brazil José Eduardo de Barros Dutra President and CEO of Petrobras CC: Ingeniero Eduardo López Minister of Mining and Energy, Republic of Ecuador Dr. Fabián Valdivieso Minister of the Environment, Republic of Ecuador Sebastiao Manchineri President, COICA Leonidas Iza President, CONAIE Juan Enomenga President, ONHAE Rodrigo de Rato y Figaredo Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund The Courts of the Republic of Ecuador, including the Constitutional Tribunal of Ecuador RE: Proposed Petrobras road into Yasuní National Park DATE: November 25, 2004 Distinguished Leaders: We respectfully write you to express our opposition to the approved Petrobras plan to construct a 54-kilometer road from the Napo River into Yasuní National Park to facilitate oil extraction. Yasuní is the largest national park in Ecuador, and has been internationally recognized for its importance, receiving designation as a UNESCO Man and The Biosphere Reserve in 1989. The road will extend 24 kilometers into one of the most intact portions of the park. We represent leading scientists of Yasuní National Park, and other tropical researchers concerned for the future of Yasuní. We come from Ecuador, Panama, Peru, Denmark, England, Germany, Greece, Scotland, Spain, and from across the United States including Puerto Rico. Together we have well over 100 years of experience conducting research in the park. We have studied many aspects of its biodiversity — plants, amphibians, insects, birds and mammals — as well as the impacts of the Maxus Road, which was built in 1994 into northwest Yasuní for petroleum activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous and Traditional Peoples of the World and Ecoregion Conservation
    Indigenous and Traditional Peoples of the World and Ecoregion Conservation An Integrated Approach to Conserving the World’s Biological and Cultural Diversity Written by Gonzalo Oviedo (WWF International) and Luisa Maffi (Terralingua). Parts II and III written by Peter Bille Larsen (WWF International) with contributions from Gonzalo Oviedo and Luisa Maffi. The views expressed in this paper are not necessarily those of WWF or Terralingua. Any inaccuracies remain the responsibility of the authors. The material and the geographical designations in this report do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of WWF concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Editing and layout: Tim Davis Coordination of publication: Diwata Olalia Hunziker Cover photographs: Top (l-r): Sing-sing (Sinasina, Papua New Guinea), WWF/Panda Photo/M. Pala; Itelmen (Russia), Viktor Nikiforov; Himba/Zemba (Namibia), WWF-Canon/John E. Newby. Middle: Kayapo (Brazil), WWF/Mauri Rautkari. Bottom: Koryak (Russia), Kevin Schafer ISBN 2-88085-247-1 Published November 2000 by WWF-World Wide Fund For Nature (formerly World Wildlife Fund), 1196 Gland, Switzerland. Any reproduction in full or in part of this publication must mention the title and credit the above-mentioned publisher as the copyright owner. © text 2000 WWF Indigenous and Traditional Peoples of the World and Ecoregion Conservation An Integrated Approach to Conserving the World’s Biological and Cultural Diversity WWF International – Terralingua Gland, Switzerland "The power to act has moved away from governments, and... the real force for environmental improvement lies with people...
    [Show full text]
  • New Species Discoveries in the Amazon 2014-15
    WORKINGWORKING TOGETHERTOGETHER TO TO SHARE SCIENTIFICSCIENTIFIC DISCOVERIESDISCOVERIES UPDATE AND COMPILATION OF THE LIST UNTOLD TREASURES: NEW SPECIES DISCOVERIES IN THE AMAZON 2014-15 WWF is one of the world’s largest and most experienced independent conservation organisations, WWF Living Amazon Initiative Instituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável with over five million supporters and a global network active in more than 100 countries. WWF’s Mamirauá (Mamirauá Institute of Leader mission is to stop the degradation of the planet’s natural environment and to build a future Sustainable Development) Sandra Charity in which humans live in harmony with nature, by conserving the world’s biological diversity, General director ensuring that the use of renewable natural resources is sustainable, and promoting the reduction Communication coordinator Helder Lima de Queiroz of pollution and wasteful consumption. Denise Oliveira Administrative director Consultant in communication WWF-Brazil is a Brazilian NGO, part of an international network, and committed to the Joyce de Souza conservation of nature within a Brazilian social and economic context, seeking to strengthen Mariana Gutiérrez the environmental movement and to engage society in nature conservation. In August 2016, the Technical scientific director organization celebrated 20 years of conservation work in the country. WWF Amazon regional coordination João Valsecchi do Amaral Management and development director The Instituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá (IDSM – Mamirauá Coordinator Isabel Soares de Sousa Institute for Sustainable Development) was established in April 1999. It is a civil society Tarsicio Granizo organization that is supported and supervised by the Ministry of Science, Technology, Innovation, and Communications, and is one of Brazil’s major research centres.
    [Show full text]
  • A Conservation Assessment of the Terrestrial Ecoregions of Latin America and the Caribbean
    A Conservation Assessment Public Disclosure Authorized of the Terrestrial Ecoregions of Latin America and the Caribbean Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Eric Dinerstein David M. Olson Douglas ). Graham Avis L. Webster Steven A. Primm Marnie P. Bookbinder George Ledec Public Disclosure Authorized r Published in association with The World Wildlife Fund The World Bank WWF Washington, D.C. A ConservationAssessment of the TerrestrialEcoregions of Latin America and the Caribbean A Conservation Assessment of the Terrestrial Ecoregions of Latin America and the Caribbean Eric Dinerstein David M. Olson Douglas J. Graham Avis L. Webster Steven A. Primm Marnie P. Bookbinder George Ledec Published in association with The World Wildlife Fund The World Bank Washington, D.C. © 1995 The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank 1818 H Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20433, U.S.A. All rights reserved Manufactured in the United States of America First printing September 1995 The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this study are entirely those of the authors and should not be attributed in any manner to the World Bank, to its affiliated organiza- tions, or to members of its Board of Executive Directors or the countries they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility whatsoever for any consequence of their use. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this volume do not imply on the part of the World Bank any judgment on the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Biota Colombiana Vol
    Biota Colombiana Vol. 12 Número 1 Enero - junio de 2011 Una publicación del /A publication of: Instituto Alexander von Humboldt En asocio con /In collaboration with: Instituto de Ciencias Naturales de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras - Invemar IOTA OLOMBIANA Missouri Botanical Garden B C ISSN 0124-5376 Volumen 12 Número 1 Enero - junio de 2011 Primer registro del dinoflagelado Neoceratium digitatum (Schütt) Gómez, Moreira y López- García 2009 (Dinophyceae), en aguas del Caribe colombiano Terebélidos (Terebellidae: Polychaeta: Annelida) del Caribe colombiano Apistogramma megaptera (Perciformes: TABLA DE CONTENIDO / TABLE OF CONTENTS Cichlidae), una nueva especie para la cuenca del Orinoco Aves del departamento de Terebélidos (Terebellidae: Polychaeta: Annelida) del Caribe colombiano - Mario H. Lóndoño Mesa ........................................ 1 Nariño, Colombia Peces del departamento de Caldas, Colombia Nuevos datos sobre la presencia de caimán llanero (Crocodylus intermedius) y notas sobre su comportamiento Apistogramma megaptera (Perciformes: Cichlidae), una nueva especie para la cuenca del Orinoco - Lina M. Mesa Salazar y en el río Vichada, Orinoquia (Colombia) Primer registro del dinoflagelado Neoceratium Carlos A. Lasso ............................................................................................................................................................................ 19 digitatum (Schütt) Gómez, Moreira y López-García 2009 (Dinophyceae), en aguas del Aves
    [Show full text]
  • OCO-2 Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Variability Across Ecoregions of the Amazon Basin and the Extreme Drought Effects of El Niño (2015–2016)
    remote sensing Article OCO-2 Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Variability across Ecoregions of the Amazon Basin and the Extreme Drought Effects of El Niño (2015–2016) Antony Oswaldo Castro 1,* , Jia Chen 2 , Christian S. Zang 1 , Ankit Shekhar 2,3 , Juan Carlos Jimenez 4 , Shrutilipi Bhattacharjee 2, Mengistie Kindu 1 , Victor Hugo Morales 5 and Anja Rammig 1 1 Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, 85354 Freising, Germany; [email protected] (C.S.Z.); [email protected] (M.K.); [email protected] (A.R.) 2 Technical University of Munich, TUM Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 80333 Munich, Germany; [email protected] (J.C.); [email protected] (A.S.); [email protected] (S.B.) 3 ETH Zurich, Department of Environmental Systems Science, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland 4 University of Valencia, Global Change Unit, Image Processing Laboratory, 46003 Valencia, Spain; [email protected] 5 EARTH University, Center of Geomatics and Remote Detection, Mercedes 70602, Costa Rica; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 14 January 2020; Accepted: 4 April 2020; Published: 8 April 2020 Abstract: Amazonian ecosystems are major biodiversity hotspots and carbon sinks that may lose species to extinction and become carbon sources due to extreme dry or warm conditions. We investigated the seasonal patterns of high-resolution solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) measured by the satellite Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) across the Amazonian ecoregions to assess the area´s phenology and extreme drought vulnerability. SIF is an indicator of the photosynthetic activity of chlorophyll molecules and is assumed to be directly related to gross primary production (GPP).
    [Show full text]
  • Amazonian White‐Sand Forests Show
    BIOTROPICA 48(1): 47–57 2016 10.1111/btp.12302 Amazonian White-Sand Forests Show Strong Floristic Links with Surrounding Oligotrophic Habitats and the Guiana Shield Roosevelt Garcıa-Villacorta1,2,3,5, Kyle G. Dexter3,4, and Toby Pennington3 1 Institute of Molecular Plant Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3BF, U.K. 2 Centro Peruano para la Biodiversidad & Conservacion, PCBC, Iquitos, Peru 3 Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 20a Inverleith Row, Edinburgh, EH3 5LR, U.K. 4 School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3FF, U.K. ABSTRACT Amazonian white-sand forests occur on quartzitic sandy soils, are distributed as an archipelago of habitat islands across the rain forests of Amazonia and contain many endemic plant species. Surprisingly, we found that only 23 percent of plant species in western Amazon white-sand forests are white-sand specialists, while the remaining species (77%) also occur in other habitat types. Overall, our analyses revealed: (1) somewhat unexpected composition similarity of white-sand forests with nearby non-white-sand forests; (2) phytogeographi- cal connections among distant white-sand forests; and (3) a large proportion of western Amazon white-sand specialists occurring in flo- ras of the western and central Guiana Shield region (7–43%). These results suggest that dispersal from both neighboring oligotrophic non-white-sand habitats and distant white-sand forests is fundamental in shaping western Amazonian white-sand forests’ species compo- sition and diversity. Although endemism in Amazonian white-sand forests may be lower than previously estimated, conservation of this unique and fragile environment should remain a priority. Such conservation will require the maintenance of regional dispersal processes that connect these archipelagos of habitat islands and other ecologically similar oligotrophic habitats across the Amazon and the Guiana Shield.
    [Show full text]
  • Folia Conchyliologica N° 5 2 , Décembre 201 9
    Folia conchyliologica N° 5 2 , décembre 201 9 Drymaeus ( Mesembrinus ) iris (Piaget, 1914), Colombia, Calí. Photo G. Kattan. Sommaire Abraham S.H. Breure & Francisco J. Borrero - A review of Stenostylus Pilsbry , 1898 and Drymaeus Albers, 18 5 0 (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Orthalicoidea: Bulimulidae) from Colombia , with description of new species . 1 - 79 Boussenac , décembre 2019 - ISSN 2107 - 7010 Folia Conchyliologica, N° 5 1 , novembre 2019 Ligne éditoriale Soumission d’articles La priorité est donnée aux articles traitant de Les manuscrits sont rédigés au format texte malacologie continentale, autrement dit de la ( Word , OpenOffice, etc.) dans la langue souhaitée faune terrestre et dulcicole. Les articles traitant par l’auteur. Ils sont accompagnés d’un résumé et de la faune saumâtre ou marine sont acceptés de mots clés lorsque la longueur de l’article le afin de répondre à une demande croissante de justifie ; des résumés dans d’autres langues sont lec teurs intéressés par l’ensemble de la mala - aussi admis. cologie. Ils sont envoyés par voie postale ou par mail aux Sur le plan géographique, il n’est donné aucune rédacteurs : limitation, les faunes des contrées les plus lointaines ayant ici autant leur place que les Philippe Feray : [email protected] faunes de nos jardins. Alain Bertrand : abela 11 @wanadoo.fr Les articles peuvent concerner aussi bi en des Ils seront soumis à deux relecteurs du comité de observations biologiques ou naturalistes, des lecture et éventuellement à des référents exté - inventaires faunistiques, que des travaux effec - rieurs. tués sur les collections anciennes ou sur les personnes qui les ont constituées.
    [Show full text]
  • The Global 200: a Representation Approach to Conserving the Earth’S Most Biologically Valuable Ecoregions
    Issues in International Conservation The Global 200: A Representation Approach to Conserving the Earth’s Most Biologically Valuable Ecoregions The current extinction crisis re- The representation approach, ac- environmental conditions (Diner- quires dramatic action to save the va- cepted by a growing number of con- stein et al. 1995; The Nature Conser- riety of life on Earth. Because funding servationists, is soundly based in vancy 1997). Ecoregions function ef- for conservation action is limited, conservation biology. It integrates fectively as conservation units at governments, donors, and conserva- the goal of maintaining species di- regional scales because they encom- tion groups must be strategic and ear- versity—the traditional focus of bio- pass similar biological communities mark the greatest amount of resources diversity conservation—with another and because their boundaries roughly for protecting the areas richest in level of conservation action, the pre- coincide with the area over which key biodiversity. Most conservation biolo- servation of distinct ecosystems and ecological processes most strongly in- gists recognize that, although we can- ecological processes. Although more teract (Orians 1993; Noss 1996). not save everything, we should at least than half of all species are likely to To maintain representation of bio- ensure that all ecosystem and habitat occur in the world’s tropical moist diversity at a global scale, we first types are represented within re- forests, the other 50% of all species stratified ecoregions by realm (ter- gional conservation strategies (Hum- are found elsewhere. To conserve restrial, freshwater, and marine) mel 1989; Caldecott et al. 1996; Krever that half, a full representation of the and then further divided realms by et al.
    [Show full text]