Executive 0 F F Icer

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Executive 0 F F Icer Reports Control Synbol wc-7 ~ctober1958 APPROVED: 2 A Lt. coiod, cmlc Executive 0 ff icer I PART I ADMINISTRATION A. Mission and Responsibilities. No change. 13. Acquisition of Physical Facilities. C . Organization. Nuclear Activities Office established by General Orders 4, Hq, USA CmlC RDCOM, 12 August 1958. D. Development of Administrative Procedures. No change. 2 PART I1 The fiscal Wormation for this Headquarters is supplied the Chemical. Corps Comptroller. 3 A. Key Personnel. Assignment and transfer of key personnel in Headquarters, U, S. Army Chemical Corps Research and Development Codare as follows: Effectim Date Name and Status Authorits I July 1958 Colonel Victor C. Searle, Para 1, SO 67, 038 697 CmlC, assigned for Hq, USA CmlC RDCOM duty as CmlC and DA Ln Off, 9 Jul 58 and attached to US Dept of Health, Education and Wel- fare, eff 16 Jul 58, vice Colonel Walter A. Guild, 0 206 a0 CmlC h Aug 1958 Captah Joe C. Christmas, Para 1, SO 73, 0 977 a9 CmlC, assigned for Hq, USA CdC RDCQM duw as Pers Off, MOS 4 Aug 58 2110 12 Aug 58 Lt. Col. Lowell E. Thomp- Para 1, SO 77, son, 825 252, CralC relieved Hq, USA CnilC RDCOpl from assignment to Long Range 12 Aug 58 R&D plans Office and assigned as Chief, Muclear Activities Office 13 Aug 1958 Captain Harold G. 'lloung, Para 1, SO 78, 01 876 482 CnilC, designated Hq, USA CrdC RDCOM as Management linprovement 13 Aug 58 Officer in addition to his other duty Lt. Col. John G. Hof-, Para 2, SO 79, 031 856 CmlC, assigned as Hq, USA CdC RDCOM Chief, Long Range R&D Plans 15 Aug 58 Office Major Gregg Henry, 025 5'74 Para 4, SO 79, CmlC, assigned for duty as Hq, USA CdC RDCOM Ilft and CnilC Ln Officer, US 15 Aug 58 Naval Radl Def Lab, San Fran 4 PLANS A. Plans for Peacetime Establishment. No change. B. Mobilization Plans. No change. C. Current planninq. Proposed policy conference planned for 4-7 November 1958 at Cacapon State Park, West Virginia, has been cancelled. It is tentatively planned to hold this conference sometime dur- ing the Spring of 1959. 5 PART V OPERATIONS The major staff actions of Headquarters, U. S. Army Chemical Corps Research and Development Command are briefed on pages 7 through 20. i \ 6 9 July 1958 Memorandum for Dr. Schwab from Dr. Harrg M. Doukas, Chairman, Ad Hoc Idode Committee, GM;RD-PE, Subject: Meeting Concerning JWn on "Nerve Gases vs. HE, reporting on meeting convened for the purpose of planning for a color documentary film comparing effects of GB and VX VS. HE as requested by Chief, Research and Development, DA. Meeting was arranged so that DCSOPS personnel could give CmlC representatives further direction in preparation of this film, tentative completion date of which is Novmber 1958. It is improbable this deadline will be met and a more reasonable one would be approximately November 1959. This is to be a factual film from an operational viewpoint. Lt. Col. H.E. Sheppard, OC/R&D, U was consulted rior to this meeting for clarification on the request from C ReLD (Disposition Form, C/R&D to CCniLO, 4 February 1958, Subject:P Docurnentarg Film on C'W Effects (U). Points mentioned by Colonel Sheppard which should be considered in preparing film were as follows:- a. Film should depict tactical situations; b. It should test use of (34 agents under presently accepted Pentomic concept for fi- ture wars; C. All possible fortifications and tactical situa- tions should be tested; d. all presently stardamb'zed chemical weapons involved in gas warfare and all weapons presently under development by Chemical Corps Research and Development should be tested under this program; e. H13, although not mentioned in this request, should not be considered under this combination since it will probably be obsolete within time frame involved; I f. This effort should be closely coordinated with DCSOPS, Ord- nance Corps, Signal Corps, USA CniLC Board, USA CWL and ACMO/ P&D personnel, and g. This film should have a high priority since it could be used as an excellent medium for selling the Chemical Corps. Personnel attending meeting were as follows:- Lt. Col. A.H. Voegeli, DCSOPS; Lt. Col. R.B. Riindle, OCSigO; Capt. W.J. Hoff, Jr., CmlC Board; Mr. J.F. Schaeffer, CmlC Board; Lt. Cols. C.M. Schmelzle and D.J. Gaston, OACcmlO/P&D, OCCmlO; Messrs. Bo Cutter and J. Coyle, PCO, OCCmlO; Lt. Col. Clendenin, USA BWL, Dr. B. Berger, USA OdL; Mr. Peterson, USA CmlCPG, DE, Mr. H.H. Hood, Development Division, and Dr. H.M. Doukas, P&P Division, USA Cm3C RDCOM. Recommendations:- a. Money has not been made available for prepa- ration of this film. Coment No. 2, CRD/A 6789, C/M to CCmlO, 10 June 1958, Sub,ject: Request for Ehergency Funds for Research and Development, rejected request for emergency funds and sug- gested RDCOM repr0,oram available flrnds. Recammend this be done after carem investigation as to amount required (estimated cost = $lOO,OOO to $200,000). b. Meeting is being arranged with Col. B. Moore, Col. I-I.E. Sheppard, Col. C.M. Schmelzle, Mr. J. COY18, &.R.M. Acker to clearly delineate objectives of fXh. As result of meeting, it is expected that (1) A prepared justifi- cation sheet will be presented to Mg. Gen. W.R. Currie and Col. G.C. Essman so that a technical advisor can be approved as soon 7 as possible. (2) Discussions will be held by the technical advisor with personnel from OC/R&D, DCSLOG, DCSOPS, CmlC Board, etc,, so that an outline of film can be prepared within established policies as soon as possible. 9 July 1958 Letter to Chief Chemical Officer, CMLRD-D, Subject: Proposed change in Chemical Corps Hateriel Model Designation System, recornendjag (a) the practice of assigning "Ett NuJDbers to developmental items of materiel be discontinued; (b) nXM" num- bers be assigned to a given item for identification during its development and, upon type classification of item as an adopted type, the l%x"pref'ix be dropped; (c) none of the pres- prcrc- tices of identimg modifications, alternates, or variations be changed, and (d) above proposed systm not be applied retro- actively to any item previously designated by an "Ett number. A similar system was recen- adopted Ordnance Corps (OTCM 367779 qpmmd 8 May 1958) 10 July 1958 Letter to Commanding Officer, U.S. CmlC Engimerbg Command, GIGRD-9, Subject: Final Engimering Test on a1-36/37 Mechanized Flame Thrower (U), requesting ENCOM to proceed with necessary BC- tions prior to type classification of subject item. U July 1958 1st IndDrsement to Chief Chemical Officer, C6fLRD-D (7 Jul 58), Subject: Field, Protective, Mask, EUR9, forwarding following Momation with reference to mcomruendation that the currant progm for provision of test items leading to type classifi- cation of subject mask during Fourth Quarter,Fiscal Year 1959 be continued:- (a) An extensive aeries of expedited chamber tests of candidate El3R9 Mask modifications have just been completed, results of which show that two types of changes significantly improve low teInperature perfonnance capability of the mask under the test conditions. Law temperature perfonnance of each of these models is measurably better in test chambers than that of the H9Al Mash under the same conditions.~)bdationsconsist essentially of (1) n3R9 Mask with C-15 outlet valve and mtal inlet caps and (2) EUR9 Ha& with preceding changes and double eyelenses.(c)Action is being taken to insure that sufficient amounts of 43R9 Masks #ith C-15 outlet valves and metal inlet caps will be available for both Chemical Corps evaluation at Fort Greely and U.S. Array Arctic Test Board tests this #inter,(d) While addition of double eyelenses to above-described model gives better law temperature performance under the test conditions, it requires mold changes and engineering tests and will add to cost of mask. It is not known if sufficient suitable items wfth double eyelenses can be made available in the for Arctic Test Board tests. 8 uN CLASS\F\ ED 9 July 1958 Letter to Chief Chemical Officer, CYLRD-D, Subject: Report of U. S. Delegate to NATO Group of Ecperts on -pent for Pro- tection Against Chemical Warfare - Paris 17-19 June 1958 (U), transraitting copy of subject report and advising that all ac- tions required by the United Stabs as a result of meeting will be implementad by Hq, USA CmlC RDCOM. 10 July 1958 Letter to Chairman, Chemical Corps Technical Committee, (XJULD, Subject: Membership on Chemical Corps Technical Subcommittee and Committee, designating Colonel Graydon C. Essman, Member, and Dr. John L. Schwab, Alternate. 10 July 1958 Letter through Chief Chemical Officer, Attn: dCCmlO/P&D, to (s 1 DCcmlO/SA, CIJILBD-D, Subject: Combat Requirement for Massive Offensive Chemical Flame and HE Optimum Frag Head Rocket Weapons *stem (S), referring to Comment No. 3, CMLRD-D, Hq, USA CmlC RDCOM to CCmlO, same eubject (CmlC Control No. ll42-58-5), which advised that a technical feasibility study uould be prepared for subject item and would serve as the basis for reply to OC/ RB9, DA. Letter fonrards stucly for review and appmval prior to transmittal to C/W, together With a copy of Seventh Bnsy Stuw. It is concluded th& a WP T-238 rocket is feasible; however, recommendation is made that a materiel requirement for a WP T-238 warhead be held in abeyance pending completion and evaluation of further WP casualty production studies nbw in progress.
Recommended publications
  • For Commissioner Coyle
    DCN: 12358 For Commissioner Coyle Sir - this is your copy of the Fort Belvoir visit report, which is an addendum to the Fort Monmouth recommendation report. After our visit was completed, the Night Vision Lab sent copies of letters of support, and other papers that they say address questions you asked during the visit. Everything they sent has been included in this package for your perusal as well. They also requested that this report be sent to GEN Hill, but I have not done so yet and I believe that all of the pertinent issues will be covered when we brief all of the commissioners on our analysis. I can forward him a copy, however, if you think it is wise to do so. Please let me know if you have any comments or anything else you want me to get on this issue. Wes Hood SECOND ADDENDUM FORT MONMOUTH, NEW JERSEY BASE VISIT REPORT COMMISSIONER VISIT TO THE NIGHT VISION & ELECTRONIC SENSORS DIRECTORATE (COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE NIGHT VISION LAB) 1 LOCATED AT FORT BELVOIR, VA 7 JULY 2005 LEAD COMMISSIONER: Commissioner Philip Coyle CORIRIISSION STAFF: Wesley E. Hood (Army Senior Analyst) LIST OF ATTENDEES: Luanne Obert NVESD-OD Fenner Milton NVESD-OD Aaron LaPointe NVESD-STD COL McCOY NVESD-OD Kelly Sherbondy NVESD-STD Don Reago NVESD-OD CPT Nicole Clark NVESD-OD Bill Jarvis NVESD-OD John Nettleton NVESD-STD Jeanna Tendall Hq AMC Stationing Office Ken Yosuda NVESD-STD Pat Decatur U.S. Army Garrison Fort Belvoir Andy Hetrick NVESD-GCSD Michael Jemings NVESD-SPPD Wayne Antesberger NVESD-GCSD Jim Campbell NVESD-STD Paul E.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 161 CHAPTER 368 Be It Enacted Hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the ^^"'^'/Or^ C ^ United States Of
    324 PUBLIC LAW 161-JULY 15, 1955 [69 STAT. Public Law 161 CHAPTER 368 July 15.1955 AN ACT THa R 68291 *• * To authorize certain construction at inilitai-y, naval, and Air F<n"ce installations, and for otlier purposes. Be it enacted hy the Senate and House of Representatives of the an^^"'^'/ord Air Forc^e conc^> United States of America in Congress assembled^ struction TITLE I ^'"^" SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army is authorized to establish or develop military installations and facilities by the acquisition, con­ struction, conversion, rehabilitation, or installation of permanent or temporary public works in respect of the following projects, which include site preparation, appurtenances, and related utilities and equipment: CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES TECHNICAL SERVICES FACILITIES (Ordnance Corps) Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland: Troop housing, community facilities, utilities, and family housing, $1,736,000. Black Hills Ordnance Depot, South Dakota: Family housing, $1,428,000. Blue Grass Ordnance Depot, Kentucky: Operational and mainte­ nance facilities, $509,000. Erie Ordnance Depot, Ohio: Operational and maintenance facilities and utilities, $1,933,000. Frankford Arsenal, Pennsylvania: Utilities, $855,000. LOrdstown Ordnance Depot, Ohio: Operational and maintenance facilities, $875,000. Pueblo Ordnance Depot, (^olorado: Operational and maintenance facilities, $1,843,000. Ked River Arsenal, Texas: Operational and maintenance facilities, $140,000. Redstone Arsenal, Alabama: Research and development facilities and community facilities, $2,865,000. E(.>ck Island Arsenal, Illinois: Operational and maintenance facil­ ities, $347,000. Rossford Ordnance Depot, Ohio: Utilities, $400,000. Savanna Ordnance Depot, Illinois: Operational and maintenance facilities, $342,000. Seneca Ordnance Depot, New York: Community facilities, $129,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 15, 1996 / Notices 53725
    Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 15, 1996 / Notices 53725 Department of the Army 30537), which provided notice that the comments are received that would Draft EIS was available for comment. result in a contrary determination. Notice of Availability of the Final Comments from the DEIS have been ADDRESSES: Send comments to General Environmental Impact Statement for considered and responses are included Counsel, Defense Special Weapons the Disposal of Chemical Agents and in this Final EIS. After a 30-day waiting Agency, 6801 Telegraph Road, Munitions Stored at Pine Bluff Arsenal, period the Army will publish a Record Alexandria, VA 22310±3398 Arkansas of Decision. Copies of the Final EIS may FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD. be obtained by writing to the following address: Program Manager for Chemical Sandy Barker at (703) 325±7681. ACTION: Notice of availability. Demilitarization, ATTN: SFAE±CD±ME, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The SUMMARY: This announces the Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland Defense Special Weapons Agency availability of the Final Environmental 21010±5401. notices for systems of records subject to Impact Statement (FEIS) on the ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), construction and operation of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as amended, have been published in the proposed chemical agent will also publish a Notice of Availability Federal Register and are available from demilitarization facility at Pine Bluff for the Final EIS in the Federal Register. the address above. Arsenal, Arkansas. The proposed FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The proposed amendments are not facility will be used to demilitarize all Above address, or Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Chief of Chemical and Commandant, U.S
    U.S. Army Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear School (573) XXX-XXXX Army Chemical Review (ACR) (ISSN 0899-7047) is published biannually in June and December by the U.S. DSN 676-XXXX (563 prefix) or 581-XXXX (596 prefix) Army Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear School (USACBRNS), Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri. ACR COMMANDANT highlights unique Army chemical, biological, radiological, COL(P) Daryl O. Hood 563-8053 and nuclear technical-response capabilities for supporting <[email protected]> national countering weapons of mass destruction operations ASSISTANT COMMANDANT and conducting all-hazmat mitigation across the range of COL Sean G. Kirschner 563-8053 military operations anytime, anywhere. The objectives of <[email protected]> ACR are to inform, motivate, increase knowledge, improve performance, and provide a forum for the exchange of CHIEF OF STAFF ideas. This publication presents professional information; LTC Christine L. Kay 563-8052 but the views expressed herein are those of the authors, <[email protected]> not the Department of Defense or its elements. The content does not necessarily reflect the official U.S. Army position REGIMENTAL COMMAND SERGEANT MAJOR and does not change or supersede any information in other RCSM Christopher Williams 563-6133 U.S. Army publications. The use of news items constitutes <[email protected]> neither affirmation of their accuracy nor product endorsement. REGIMENTAL CHIEF WARRANT OFFICER RCWO Robert A. Lockwood 563-8051 Articles to be considered for publication are due <[email protected]> 15 February and 15 August. Send submissions by e-mail to <[email protected]>, DEPUTY COMMANDANT or send an electronic copy in Microsoft® Word on a CD and Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Oak Ridge Institute of Nuclear Studies
    7 1. 2 4E3 5 of the Oak Ridge Institute of Nuclear Studies June 30, 1955 Operating Under Conuact With the UNITED STATES ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION .. - . .. -.. - AEC. Omk Ridge, Te- 1+3.55-INS19 DOE/HQ ties thir in May of the f tope-technique ei bower'swith other plan countries. 101 311CLI~~bb --- I PhY- .. - ..__ Atthebeginningoftheyear, thethirty-ei&fh ADVANCED COURSES * .,,< ...-*;* i* class in basic radioisotope techniques was in session; on the last day of the fiscal year, the Fifty participants from 20 states and forty-fourth basic class was graduated and Ra- District of Columbia came to Oak Ridge in dioisotope Participadt Number 2106 returned tember for the Division's one-week adva to his own organization coursein the use of radioisotopes in bioch It was the forty-thi through 27, which -.,vasdesignated as the Atoms the Institute, and featured turo intied P for Peace course, and which was attended by by eminent sci 32 participants from 21 foreigncountries rep- as a number of papers contribut resenting 12 language groups. The coursewas ticipants'. inauguratedwith the proclamation of April 30 On September 7, the Division Wtia as Atoms for Peace in 03Jr Ridge, adwithL the participants as guests "of honor 'at a- luncheon given by Carbide and Carbon memi- theneeds of_. ar 22 such courses, me urst 01 tneir Kina ever inls researcn bas urig~ii~~iyiiiLt:uucu LO OUoffered in the United States, were con- prove the natural occurrence of uranium-236, ,be Jcted during the year, in‘cooperation with the which in geological time is a relatively short- .d,ersity of Tennessee-Atomic Energy Com- lived isotope, by measuring its thorium-232 lission Agricultural Research Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Cadet Leader's Handbook
    Cadet Handbook University of New Hampshire Army ROTC University of New Hampshire Cadet Handbook September 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page # CHAPTER I - INTRODUCTION Preface………………………………………………………………………….................(5) Mission………………………………………………………………………………………(5) History……………………………………………………………………………………....(6) Patch & Crest………………………………………………………………………...........(8) The Cadet Creed………………………………………………....……...........................(9) The Soldiers Creed………………………………………………....…….....................(10) The Warrior Ethos……………………………………………………………….............(10) The Army Values………………………………………………………………………….(11) The General Orders………………………………………………..............................(12) The Army Song…………………………………………………………………………...(13) CHAPTER II - THE ROAD TO COMMISSIONING Program Entry Options……………………………………………………………….….(14) Means of Entry……………………………………………………………………………(14) Contracting Requirements………………………………………………………………(14) Retention……………………………………………………………………..…….……..(15) Commissioning Criteria…………………………………………………...……………..(15) Accessions Process (Component and branch)……………………………………….(15) Scholarships………………………………………………………………………………(16) CHAPTER III - CADET CHAIN OF COMMAND Battalion (BN) Leadership………………………………………………………….…....(18) Company (CO) Leadership…………………………………………………………...…(20) Platoon (PLT) Leadership……………………………………………………………….(21) Rank Structure……………………………………………………………………………(22) CHAPTER IV - CUSTOMS AND COURTESIES Salute……………………………………………………………………………………...(23) Addressing an Officer……………………………………………………………………(24) Addressing a Non-Commissioned Officer………………………………….………….(24)
    [Show full text]
  • Commissioning
    UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO V COMMISSIONING Reserve Officers’ Training Corps VISION, MISSION, & VALUES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO vision The University of San Francisco will be internationally recognized as a premier Jesuit Catholic, urban University with a global perspective that educates leaders who will fashion a more humane and just world. mission The core mission of the University is to promote learning in the Jesuit Catholic tradition. The University offers undergraduate, graduate and professional students the knowledge and skills needed to succeed as persons and professionals, and the values and sensitivity necessary to be men and women for others. The University will distinguish itself as a diverse, socially responsible learning community of high quality scholarship and academic rigor sustained by a faith that does justice. The University will draw from the cultural, intellectual and economic resources of the San Francisco Bay Area and its location on the Pacific Rim to enrich and strengthen its educational programs. values The University’s core values include a belief in and a commitment to advancing: 1. The Jesuit Catholic Tradition that views faith and reason as complementary resources in the search for truth and authentic human development, and that welcomes persons of all faiths or no religious beliefs as fully contributing partners to the University; 2. The Freedom and the Responsibility to pursue truth and follow evidence to its conclusion; 3. Learning as a humanizing, social activity rather than a competitive exercise; 4. A Common Good that transcends the interests of particular individuals or groups; and reasoned discourse rather than coercion as the norm for decision making; 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide for the Selection of Personal Protective Equipment for Emergency First Responders
    U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice National Institute of Justice Law Enforcement and Corrections Standards and Testing Program Guide for the Selection of Personal Protective Equipment for Emergency First Responders NIJ Guide 102–00 Volume I November 2002 U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs 810 Seventh Street N.W. Washington, DC 20531 John Ashcroft Attorney General Deborah J. Daniels Assistant Attorney General Sarah V. Hart Director, National Institute of Justice For grant and funding information, contact: Department of Justice Response Center 800–421–6770 Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice World Wide Web Site World Wide Web Site http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice Guide for the Selection of Personal Protective Equipment for Emergency First Responders NIJ Guide 102-00, Volume I Dr. Alim A. Fatah1 John A. Barrett2 Richard D. Arcilesi, Jr.2 Charlotte H. Lattin2 Charles G. Janney2 Edward A. Blackman2 Coordination by: Office of Law Enforcement Standards National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899–8102 Prepared for: National Institute of Justice Office of Science and Technology Washington, DC 20531 November 2002 This document was prepared under CBIAC contract number SPO-900-94-D-0002 and Interagency Agreement M92361 between NIST and the Department of Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC). NCJ 191518 1National Institute of Standards and Technology, Office of Law Enforcement Standards. 2Battelle Memorial Institute. National Institute of Justice Sarah V. Hart Director This guide was prepared for the National Institute of Justice, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Dictionary of United States Army Terms (Short Title: AD)
    Army Regulation 310–25 Military Publications Dictionary of United States Army Terms (Short Title: AD) Headquarters Department of the Army Washington, DC 15 October 1983 UNCLASSIFIED SUMMARY of CHANGE AR 310–25 Dictionary of United States Army Terms (Short Title: AD) This change-- o Adds new terms and definitions. o Updates terms appearing in the former edition. o Deletes terms that are obsolete or those that appear in the DOD Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms, JCS Pub 1. This regulation supplements JCS Pub 1, so terms that appear in that publication are available for Army-wide use. Headquarters *Army Regulation 310–25 Department of the Army Washington, DC 15 October 1983 Effective 15 October 1986 Military Publications Dictionary of United States Army Terms (Short Title: AD) in JCS Pub 1. This revision updates the au- will destroy interim changes on their expira- thority on international standardization of ter- tion dates unless sooner superseded or re- m i n o l o g y a n d i n t r o d u c e s n e w a n d r e v i s e d scinded. terms in paragraph 10. S u g g e s t e d I m p r o v e m e n t s . T h e p r o p o - Applicability. This regulation applies to the nent agency of this regulation is the Assistant Active Army, the Army National Guard, and Chief of Staff for Information Management. the U.S. Army Reserve. It applies to all pro- Users are invited to send comments and sug- ponent agencies and users of Army publica- g e s t e d i m p r o v e m e n t s o n D A F o r m 2 0 2 8 tions.
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2016 Economic Impact Analysis of Maryland's Military Installations
    FY 2016 Economic Impact Analysis of Maryland’s Military Installations Prepared for Maryland Department of Commerce Daraius Irani, Ph.D., Chief Economist Michael Siers, Interim Director of Research Ellen Bast, Senior Research Associate Jacob Leh, Research Associate I Catherine Menking, Economist Nick Wetzler, Economist December 18, 2018 Towson, Maryland 21252 | 410-704-3326 | www.towson.edu/resi FY 2016 Economic Impact Analysis of Maryland’s Military Installations RESI of Towson University Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................ 2 Table of Figures ............................................................................................................................... 4 1.0 Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. 7 1.1 Methodology Overview .................................................................................................... 8 1.2 Statewide Economic Impacts ........................................................................................... 8 1.3 Comparison between FY 2012 and FY 2016 Impacts ..................................................... 10 2.0 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 12 3.0 Methodology .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • In the Us Biological Warfare Programs Volume I
    DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY US ARMY RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING COMMAND 5183 BLACKHAWK ROAD ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND MD 21010-5424 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF: December 3, 2009 Office of the Chief Counsel Mr. John Greenewald Dear Mr. Greenewald: This is the final response to your FOIA request dated March 13, 2009, for a copy of all documents pertaining to a 1977 incident that the U.S. Army had staged a mock biological attack on San Francisco, California. The Research, Development and Engineering Command located the record, US Army Activity in the U.S. Biological Warfare Program, 1942-1977s, Volume 1. 25 February 1977. I enclosed a redacted version of the record. Additionally, we located an excerpt from the book Clouds of Secrecy, The Army’s Germ Warfare Tests over Populated Areas, written by Leonard A. Cole. Mr. Cole’s book is available to the general public on the open market. The redacted record was subject to FOIA exemption (b)(2) HIGH. Exemption (b)(2) HIGH protects substantial internal matters where disclosure would risk circumvention of a legal requirement. Additionally, the redacted information is sensitive to internal Army operations. Mr. Brian May, Research, Development and Engineering Command’s Freedom of Information Act Officer, conducted a brief search of the Defense Technical Information Center secure library and determined additional records may exist. If you seek additional information on this subject, I suggest you submit a Freedom of Information Act request with the Defense Technical Information Center using the title of the enclosed record. I provided the Defense Technical Information Center, Freedom of Information Act Office’s website below.
    [Show full text]
  • Inside Covers
    USACMLS/MANSCEN 573-XXX-XXXX/DSN 676-XXXX CML, Army Chemical Review is pre- COMMANDANT pared twice a year by the U.S. Army COL (P) Stanley H. Lillie 563-8053 Chemical School, Fort Leonard Wood, <[email protected]> Missouri. CML presents professional infor- ASSISTANT COMMANDANT mation about Chemical Corps functions COL Gary Wallace 563-8054 related to nuclear, biological, chemical, <[email protected]> smoke, flame field expedients, and NBC COMMAND SERGEANT MAJOR reconnaissance in combat support. Objec- CSM Peter Hiltner 563-8051 tives of CML are to inform, motivate, in- <[email protected]> crease knowledge, improve performance, and provide a forum for exchange of ideas. 3d CHEMICAL BRIGADE/DSN 581-XXXX COL Don Bailey 596-0016 This publication presents professional <[email protected]> information, but the views expressed herein are those of the authors, not the 82d CHEMICAL BATTALION Department of Defense or its elements. LTC John Kulifay 596-4835 <[email protected]> The content does not necessarily reflect the official U.S. Army position and does not 84th CHEMICAL BATTALION change or supersede any information in LTC Peggy Combs 596-2414 other U.S. Army publications. Use of news <[email protected]> items constitutes neither affirmation of their 58th TRANSPORTATION BATTALION accuracy or product endorsement. LTC Eric Hazas 596-0991 Articles may be reprinted if credit is <[email protected]> given to CML and its authors. All photo- USACMLS Directors graphs are official U.S. Army photos un- DOCTRINE, ORGANIZATION, TRAINING, MATERIEL, less otherwise noted. CML reserves the LEADERSHIP AND EDUCATION, PERSONNEL, AND right to edit material.
    [Show full text]