J. Draft PEIR Notification and Public Hearing Materials

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

J. Draft PEIR Notification and Public Hearing Materials Appendix J Appendix J. Draft PEIR Notification and Public Hearing Materials APPENDIX J Draft PEIR Notification and Public Hearing Materials SF Planning Department Case No. 2005.0159E J-1 PEIR on SFPUC Water System Improvement Program / 203287 APPENDIX J1 Public Hearing Summary Summary of WSIP Draft PEIR Notification and Public Hearings The San Francisco Planning Department published the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) on the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission’s Water System Improvement Program (WSIP) on June 29, 2007. The public comment period to review the Draft PEIR began on Friday, June 29, 2007 with submittal of the Draft PEIR to the State Clearinghouse and the issuance of the Notice of Availability (NOA). The Draft PEIR and NOA included notification of the public comment period and public hearings, and announced that public meetings were to be held on September 5, 6, 18, 19, and 20 and written comments were to be accepted to be through October 1, 2007. After the public hearing on September 20, the San Francisco Planning Department scheduled an additional public hearing for October 11 and extended the official public comment period to October 15, 2007. Notification of Release of Draft PEIR The San Francisco Planning Department notified agencies and the public in writing regarding about the availability of the Draft PEIR and the public hearing dates and locations. The notification provided details on the comment process. The following methods of notification were used: Mailing List. A mailing list was compiled, including over 1600 contacts for direct mail and 300 for e-mail, representing affected federal, state, regional, and local agencies; federal, state, regional, and local elected officials; regional and local interest groups; member agencies of the Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency (BAWSCA); other potentially affected water and irrigation districts; SFPUC Community Advisory Committee members; information repositories; media contacts; and individuals who attended the scoping and other past meetings on the WSIP PEIR. Draft PEIR and NOA. On June 29th, printed copies of the Draft PEIR were distributed to 70 state and local agencies, and 15 hardcopies of the Draft PEIR Summary, 15 CDs containing the full Draft PEIR, and one hardcopy of the Notice of Completion were delivered to the State Clearinghouse. Copies of the Draft PEIR or CDs of the draft document were also sent to 365 additional organizations and individuals. In addition, a Notice of Availability (NOA) of the draft document was distributed via first-class mail to the entire mailing list. SF Planning Department Case No. 2005.0159E J1-1 PEIR on SFPUC Water System Improvement Program / 203287 Appendix J1 Public Hearing Summary Meeting Notification. Notice of the initial five public hearings was provided to individuals and the general public through the following means: Direct mail of the NOA and notice of public hearings • On 6/29/07 the NOA, including notice of public hearings, was sent by first class mail to a contact list of approximately 1,627 entities (individuals or organizations). • On 8/27/07 a post card follow up notice of the public hearings and comment period was sent by first class mail to an expanded contact list of approximately 1,751 entities. E-mail notice of NOA • On 6/29-30/07 an electronic NOA and notice of public hearings was emailed to a list of 818 e-mails. • On 8/24/07 a follow-up email notice of the public hearings and public comment period was sent to an expanded e-mail list of 1,124. • On 10/8-9/07 an additional follow-up email notice of the public hearings and public comment period was sent to the e-mail list of 1,124 noticing the extended comment period and additional public hearing. Legal Notices Notices of the public hearings and information on how to obtain a copy of the Draft PEIR and provide public comment were placed and run in the legal classified section of the following newspapers on the following dates: • Modesto Bee, 6/29/07 and 7/13/07 • San Francisco Chronicle, 6/29/07 • Sonora Union Democrat, 7/2/07 • San Mateo County Times 6/29/07 • Stockton Record, 7/3/07 Display Ads Display ads with information about the public meetings and information on how to obtain a copy of the Draft PEIR and provide public comment were placed and run in the following newspapers on the following dates: • Modesto Bee, 8/27/07 • San Mateo County Times, 9/7/07 • Sonoma Union Democrat, 8/27/07 • SF Examiner, 9/10/07 • Stockton Record, 9/10/07 Website The SFPUC updated the WSIP PEIR webpage on sfwater.org (http://PEIR.sfwater.org) to include the NOA and notice of public hearings, and similar information was posted on the Planning Department’s website at www.sfgov.org/site/planning/mea. SF Planning Department Case No. 2005.0159E J1-2 PEIR on SFPUC Water System Improvement Program / 203287 Appendix J1 Public Hearing Summary Information Repositories Printed copies of the Draft PEIR and associated reference materials (in some cases as noted below), as well as the NOA and notice of the public hearings were posted in the following locations: • Alameda County/City of Fremont Library (copy of Draft PEIR and associated reference materials) • San Francisco Main Library (copy of Draft PEIR and associated reference materials) • Stockton – San Joaquin County Public Library (copy of Draft PEIR and associated reference materials) • City of San Mateo Main Library (copy of Draft PEIR and associated reference materials) • San Jose – Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Library (copy of Draft PEIR and associated reference materials) • Modesto Library (copy of Draft PEIR and associated reference materials) • San Francisco Planning Department (copy of Draft PEIR only is available) • San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, by appointment (copy of Draft PEIR and associated reference materials) • Tuolumne County Library (copy of Draft PEIR and associated reference materials) In addition, a copy of the Draft PEIR was posted to www.sfgov.org/planning/mea on June 29th and a link on the http:PEIR.sfwater.org Web site directed viewers to the www.sfgov.org Web site for document review. Table J-1 presents a breakdown of the categories of recipients who were on the mailing list: TABLE J-1 NUMBER OF RECIPIENTS ON MAILING LIST FOR DRAFT PEIR AND NOA Number of Recipients of Public Hearing Notices Number of Number of (NOA, E-notice Recipients of Public Recipients of and/or Postcard Hearing Notices and Category Draft PEIR notice) Draft PEIR Federal Agencies/Elected Officials 25 70 95 State and Regional Agencies/Elected Officials 42 118 160 Local Agencies/Elected Officials 66 566 632 Water Agencies/Irrigation Districts 85 238 323 Special Interest and Environmental Groups 79 256 335 Businesses or other Organizations 64 83 147 Media, Libraries, and Individuals 76 166 242 TOTAL 437a 1,497b 1,934 a Received either printed copy or CD b Received at least one notice (printed copy NOA, email notice, or postcard notice) SF Planning Department Case No. 2005.0159E J1-3 PEIR on SFPUC Water System Improvement Program / 203287 Appendix J1 Public Hearing Summary Public Hearings on Draft PEIR The San Francisco Planning Department held public hearings at five locations along or near the SFPUC’s regional water system during September 2007 and one public hearing in San Francisco in October 2007. The locations and dates of the meetings, and approximate number of attendees, are noted below. 1. Sonora: Wednesday, September 5, 2007 (Sonora Opera House) Approximately 92 attendees based on sign-in sheets, including: • Government agencies: Tuolumne County CAO’s Office, Office of Congressman George Radanovich, Tuolumne County Board of Supervisors, Tuolumne Utilities District, • Water agencies: Turlock Irrigation District, Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency (BAWSCA) • Environmental interests: Restore Hetch Hetchy, Tuolumne River Trust, Sierra Club, Stanislaus National Forest, California Native Plant Society, Review Trust, Land Trust, Audubon, Central Sierra Environmental Resource Center • Commercial interests: Condor Earth Tech., Arta River Trips, • Other interests: Bramlette Consulting, RHN, CSCN, Tuolumne County Farm Bureau • Media: Clarke Broadcasting, KVMV, Star 92.7, 93.5 KKBN • Public Citizens 25 total speakers (21 unique speakers since some speakers spoke more than once): • Stan Kellog, Tuolumne County Farm Bureau • Dolores Boutin, Tuolumne River Trust, Sierra Club, Save the Bay • Cynthia King, Tuolumne River Trust • Fred Boutin • Nicole Sandkulla, Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency • Bob Hackamack, Restore Hetch Hetchy • Jerry Cadagan • Galen Weston, Tuolumne River Trust • Darryl Bramlette, Bramlette Consulting • Ellie Owen • Patricia Elliott • Jimmy Gado • Pete Kampa, Tuolumne Utilities District • Jon Sturtevant • Ron Pickup • Doris Grinn • Jim Grinnell • Noah Hughes • Robert Gelman • Joseph Day, Tuolumne Utilities District SF Planning Department Case No. 2005.0159E J1-4 PEIR on SFPUC Water System Improvement Program / 203287 Appendix J1 Public Hearing Summary 2. Modesto: Thursday, September 6, 2007 (Thomas Downey High School Cafeteria) Approximately 54 attendees based on sign-in sheet, including: • Government agencies: Tuolumne River Regional Park, Stanislaus County, Stanislaus County Department of Environmental Resources, Waterford River Park, National Resource Conservation Service (NRCS), • Water agencies: Turlock Irrigation District, Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency (BAWSCA), California Department of Water Resources, Oakdale Irrigation
Recommended publications
  • Regional Electric Vehicle Outreach and Marketing Plan
    Regional Electric Vehicle Outreach and Marketing Plan Driving to Net Zero Submitted to: Santa Clara County County of Santa Clara Office of Sustainability Submitted by: ICF FUNDED THROUGH A GRANT AWARDED BY THE CALIFORNIA MARCH 9, 2018 STRATEGIC GROWTH COUNCIL Driving to Net Zero: Outreach Campaign Acknowledgements The work upon which this publication is based was funded in whole or in part through a grant awarded by the California Strategic Growth Council. Santa Clara County would like to acknowledge the cities of Cupertino, Morgan Hill, Mountain View, Palo Alto, San Jose, and Sunnyvale for their contributions and support as partners in the Driving to Net Zero Project. Disclaimer The statements and conclusions of this report are those of the County of Santa Clara and/or ICF and not necessarily those of the California Strategic Growth Council or of the California Department of Conservation, or its employees. The California Strategic Growth Council and the California Department of Conservation make no warranties, express or implied, and assume no liability for the information contained in the succeeding text. 2 Driving to Net Zero: Outreach Campaign Table of Contents I. Setting the Stage ............................................................................................................................. 4 II. The Goal ........................................................................................................................................... 5 III. The Audience ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SAN FRANCISCO 2Nd Quarter 2014 Office Market Report
    SAN FRANCISCO 2nd Quarter 2014 Office Market Report Historical Asking Rental Rates (Direct, FSG) SF MARKET OVERVIEW $60.00 $57.00 $55.00 $53.50 $52.50 $53.00 $52.00 $50.50 $52.00 Prepared by Kathryn Driver, Market Researcher $49.00 $49.00 $50.00 $50.00 $47.50 $48.50 $48.50 $47.00 $46.00 $44.50 $43.00 Approaching the second half of 2014, the job market in San Francisco is $40.00 continuing to grow. With over 465,000 city residents employed, the San $30.00 Francisco unemployment rate dropped to 4.4%, the lowest the county has witnessed since 2008 and the third-lowest in California. The two counties with $20.00 lower unemployment rates are neighboring San Mateo and Marin counties, $10.00 a mark of the success of the region. The technology sector has been and continues to be a large contributor to this success, accounting for 30% of job $0.00 growth since 2010 and accounting for over 1.5 million sf of leased office space Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 2012 2012 2012 2013 2013 2013 2013 2014 2014 this quarter. Class A Class B Pre-leasing large blocks of space remains a prime option for large tech Historical Vacancy Rates companies looking to grow within the city. Three of the top 5 deals involved 16.0% pre-leasing, including Salesforce who took over half of the Transbay Tower 14.0% (delivering Q1 2017) with a 713,727 sf lease. Other pre-leases included two 12.0% full buildings: LinkedIn signed a deal for all 450,000 sf at 222 2nd Street as well 10.0% as Splunk, who grabbed all 182,000 sf at 270 Brannan Street.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Radio Classical Audience January 2017
    Public Radio Classical Audience January 2017 Background & Executive Summary § On behalf of the Classical Music Rising project Scott Williams approached NPR to assess what NPR Audience Insights has learned from classical music stations in PPM markets that might apply to all markets. § Using a Mon-Sun 6a-7p schedule, we identified 26 stations whose schedules consist at least 90% of classical music programming in PPM markets and 113 stations in diary metro markets. § Classical music stations in PPM markets… § comprise a larger percentage of listening § Have seen significant growth in listening since 2012; the growth spans from 6a to midnight § These stations have experienced double digit percentage growth in cume and AQH since Spring 2012 across each major daypart (morning, midday, afternoon and evenings) § In terms of percent growth, the largest increases occurred in the MF 3p-7p daypart: (cume 16% and AQH 35%) § Diary market stations … § Have not seen dramatic listening growth. We see a slight bump between 2p and 7p § Have experienced a similar growth in cume listeners, but AQH growth is considerably more modest, and has been flat in the morning daypart and nearly flat in the midday. § Time spent listening in PPM markets has grown over the past year, while it has declined in diary markets. That said, TSL is greater in diary markets, as one might expect using a diary methodology. § Percent of audience that is P1 has remained fairly consistent in PPM and diary markets § Listening to classical music stations in PPM and diary markets is growing in the 65+ demo. § I would be hesitant to draw any listening conclusions in diary markets, given the vastly different AQH measures.
    [Show full text]
  • Shiloh III Draft EIR Volume II Part 4
    LT3 #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 Figure 3: Location of Long Term measurement site LT3 in the western region of the project area along with numbers assigned to each residence considered minute increments over the course of the measurements. At the time the sound level meters were installed, the wind was gusting to about 2.5 to 5 m/s and most WTG’s in the vicinity of the sites were operating. Similar conditions were observed when the meters were removed on Tuesday, the 17th. Measurements at the LT1 site were at a location about 1000 feet to the west of Azevedo Road and 0.85 miles south of SR 12 near Residence #18 (Figure 4). The hourly noise level data for the measurement period is presented in Figure 5. The Leq levels for the three full days of testing in the 24-hour periods beginning at midnight produced CNEL 11 Residence #18 values of 48 to 49 dBA. This range Figure 4: Location of LT1 near falls below these measured for other Residence # 18 wind energy projects which had ranged from 56 to 74 CNEL. This is likely due to two different of noise. This location is setback from Azevedo Road which is larger than it 85 LT1 has been in the previous long term 80 noise measurements. This location is 75 also somewhat protected from the 70 prevailing wind by the As a result, the trends in the L potential sources 65 L 60 90 Leq to the noisewind levels speed bear measured little resemblance at the 55 nearby met tower at a height of 10m 50 (Figure 6).
    [Show full text]
  • Kern Community Radio
    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Amendment of Section 73.3556 of the ) MB Docket No. 19-310 Commission’s Rules Regarding Duplication of ) Programming on Commonly Owned Radio Stations ) ) Modernization of Media Regulation ) MB Docket No. 17-105 Initiative ) Reply Comments of Kern Community Radio This reply comment is from nonprofit Kern Community Radio (“Kern”). Kern is a prospective non-commercial community broadcaster in Bakersfield, California. Kern is supplying this comment to shed light on the reality of how duplicated- and rebroadcast- programming is an epidemic. Redundant and relayed programming is hollowing-out local radio, vastly reducing programming diversity, and frustrating diverse new broadcast entrants. This reply is being filed as a response to National Association of Broadcasters’ (“NAB”) comment stating that diversity has increased on the dail, advocating the lift of the duplication rule. Kern provides proof in this reply that the program duplication rules need to be expanded to ensure local programming diversity and allow for new entrants. About Kern Community Radio Members of Kern Community Radio had desired to pursue a non-commercial, educational community radio station for Bakersfield in 2006 due to the total absence of any local local secular non-commercial radio. Bakersfield, a metropolitan area of roughly 840,000 people, does not have one local-studio secular, non-commercial radio station. That includes no secular LPFM, no local-content NPR station,1 no community station, or no college station. The entire non-commercial FM band except for one station is all relayed via satellite from chiefly religious broadcasters from Texas, Idaho, and Northern California.
    [Show full text]
  • Facility ID Call Sign Class Radio Licensee City State Number 38439
    Facility ID Call Sign Class Radio Licensee City State Number 38439 WACA AM AC ACQUISITION, LLC WHEATON MD 12156 KBRZ AM ALELUYA CHRISTIAN BROADCASTING, INC. MISSOURI CITY TX 25405 KMRI AM ALPHA & OMEGA COMMUNICATIONS, LLC WEST VALLEY CITY UT 202 KJFK AM AMERICAN LAS VEGAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP RENO NV 10333 KHAT AM APPALOOSA BROADCASTING CO., INC. LARAMIE WY 12816 WKUN AM B.R. ANDERSON MONROE GA 4050 WJBI AM BATESVILLE BROADCASTING CO., INC. BATESVILLE MS 5888 WCRL AM BLOUNT COUNTY BROADCASTING SERVICE, INC. ONEONTA AL 56474 KIRT AM BRAVO BROADCASTING CO., INC. MISSION TX 13716 WSNG AM BUCKLEY BROADCASTING OF CONNECTICUT, LLC TORRINGTON CT 22099 KWHN AM CAPSTAR TX LLC FORT SMITH AR 70862 WKCI AM CC LICENSES, LLC WAYNESBORO VA 13985 KORL AM CENTRO CRISTIANO VIDA ABUDANTE, INC. HONOLULU HI 51331 WHO AM CITICASTER LICENSES, INC. DES MOINES IA 51970 WFLF AM CLEAR CHANNEL BROADCASTING LICENSES, INC. PINE HILLS FL 17201 KTFJ AM DONALD A. SWANSON DAKOTA CITY NE 29915 KIMP AM EAST TEXAS BROADCASTING, INC. MOUNT PLEASANT TX 60646 KLBB AM ENDURANCE BROADCASTING, LLC STILLWATER MN 1912 WEEI AM ENTERCOM BOSTON LICENSE, LLC BOSTON MA 20483 KHRT AM FAITH BROADCASTING, INC. MINOT ND 21233 KBEC AM FAYE AND RICHARD TUCK, INC. WAXAHACHIE TX 12810 KRSN AM GILLIAN SUTTON LOS ALAMOS NM 41826 WQXO AM GREAT LAKES RADIO, INC. MUNISING MI 37023 WZNG AM JAX BROADCASTING, LLC SHELBYVILLE TN 30600 KDQN AM JAY W. BUNYARD & ANNE W. BUNYARD DE QUEEN AR 1060 WRBE AM JDL CORPORATION LUCEDALE MS 31888 KLMX AM JIMMY N. AND MELBA MCCOLLUM CLAYTON NM 33623 KBKW AM JODESHA BROADCASTING, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Clear Channel and the Public Airwaves Dorothy Kidd University of San Francisco, [email protected]
    The University of San Francisco USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center Media Studies College of Arts and Sciences 2005 Clear Channel and the Public Airwaves Dorothy Kidd University of San Francisco, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.usfca.edu/ms Part of the Critical and Cultural Studies Commons, and the Mass Communication Commons Recommended Citation Kidd, D. (2005). Clear channel and the public airwaves. In E. Cohen (Ed.), News incorporated (pp. 267-285). New York: Prometheus Books. Copyright © 2005 by Elliot D. Cohen. This Book Chapter is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts and Sciences at USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. It has been accepted for inclusion in Media Studies by an authorized administrator of USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 13 CLEAR CHANNEL AND THE PUBLIC AIRWAVES DOROTHY KIDD UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO With research assistance from Francisco McGee and Danielle Fairbairn Department of Media Studies, University of San Francisco DOROTHY KIDD, a professor of media studies at the University of San Francisco, has worked extensively in community radio and television. In 2002 Project Censored voted her article "Legal Project to Challenge Media Monopoly " No. 1 on its Top 25 Censored News Stories list. Pub­ lishing widely in the area of community media, her research has focused on the emerging media democracy movement. INTRODUCTION or a company with close ties to the Bush family, and a Wal-mart-like F approach to culture, Clear Channel Communications has provided a surprising boost to the latest wave of a US media democratization movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Changemakers: Biographies of African Americans in San Francisco Who Made a Difference
    The University of San Francisco USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center Leo T. McCarthy Center for Public Service and McCarthy Center Student Scholarship the Common Good 2020 Changemakers: Biographies of African Americans in San Francisco Who Made a Difference David Donahue Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.usfca.edu/mccarthy_stu Part of the History Commons CHANGEMAKERS AFRICAN AMERICANS IN SAN FRANCISCO WHO MADE A DIFFERENCE Biographies inspired by San Francisco’s Ella Hill Hutch Community Center murals researched, written, and edited by the University of San Francisco’s Martín-Baró Scholars and Esther Madríz Diversity Scholars CHANGEMAKERS: AFRICAN AMERICANS IN SAN FRANCISCO WHO MADE A DIFFERENCE © 2020 First edition, second printing University of San Francisco 2130 Fulton Street San Francisco, CA 94117 Published with the generous support of the Walter and Elise Haas Fund, Engage San Francisco, The Leo T. McCarthy Center for Public Service and the Common Good, The University of San Francisco College of Arts and Sciences, University of San Francisco Student Housing and Residential Education The front cover features a 1992 portrait of Ella Hill Hutch, painted by Eugene E. White The Inspiration Murals were painted in 1999 by Josef Norris, curated by Leonard ‘Lefty’ Gordon and Wendy Nelder, and supported by the San Francisco Arts Commission and the Mayor’s Offi ce Neighborhood Beautifi cation Project Grateful acknowledgment is made to the many contributors who made this book possible. Please see the back pages for more acknowledgments. The opinions expressed herein represent the voices of students at the University of San Francisco and do not necessarily refl ect the opinions of the University or our sponsors.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the California Historical Radio Society ~~ 1~ I I I I I I I
    V o I u m e 2 9 n u m b e r SPRI ' G&SUMMER 2 0 0 4 JOURNAL OF THE CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL RADIO SOCIETY ~~ 1~ I I I I I I I FOR THE RESTORATION A D PRESERVATION OF EARLY RADIO C a f 0 n a H s 0 c a R a d 0 s 0 c e y CHRS Officers and Staff About CHRS Board of Directors: The California Historical Radio Society, Mike Adams Chairman of the Board, Web Master (CHRS). is a non-profit educational corporation Steve Kushman President, Membership, HOTLINE chartered in the State of California. CHRS was Richard Look Treasurer, IT Specialist formed in 1974 to promote the restoration and Scott Robinson Vice President, Publicity preservation of early radio and broadcasting. Mike Simpson Mailing Our goal is to provide the opportunity to Stephen Sutley Journal Editor exchange ideas and information on the history Bill Wray Secretary of radio. particularly in the West, with empha­ sis on collecting, preserving, and displaying Staff: early equipment. literature, and programs. Paul Bourbin Events Chairman Larry Clark Technical Advisor, Librarian © California Historical Radio Society. Bart Lee General Counsel, Awards Chairman All 1ights reserved. No part of this publication Norm Lehfeldt Name Badges may be reproduced in any form, or by any Fred Meehan Journal Editor means, without prior written permission from Don Steger Sacramento Chapter Chairman CHRS. except that you may make " fair use" of Bill Wheeler CHRS CPA quotations of text fully attributed by you to the source (this Jo11ma/) and the author. The KRE Project: Project Manager / Logistics Steve Kushman Operations Manager/Safety Officer Jerry Cantou CHRS Finance & Administration Richard Look P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Foundation for a Beautiful Life, Inc., ) No
    USCA Case #20-1159 Document #1845273 Filed: 06/02/2020 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ) In re: Foundation for a Beautiful Life, Inc., ) No. 20-1159 Petitioner. ) ) OPPOSITION OF FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION TO EMERGENCY MOTION FOR STAY PENDING REVIEW The Court should deny the motion for stay filed by Foundation for a Beautiful Life, Inc. (FBL). FBL has no right to operate a radio station in northern California because it has never obtained a license from the Federal Communications Commission to do so. The FCC issued a permit for FBL to construct a low-power FM radio station in Cupertino, California. But FBL inexplicably built its station in Saratoga, California, several miles away. FBL’s Cupertino construction permit expired in 2018, and its related application for a broadcast license was dismissed in 2019. On March 20, 2020, FBL asked the Commission for Special Temporary Authority (STA) to operate its station to provide information on Covid-19 to the Mandarin-speaking community of Cupertino. Without waiting for Commission action on its request (which had not properly been submitted), FBL began broadcasting on March 27, 2020. By letter dated April 16, 2020, the Commission’s Media Bureau dismissed FBL’s STA request as procedurally USCA Case #20-1159 Document #1845273 Filed: 06/02/2020 Page 2 of 22 2 defective and, in the alternative, denied the request on the merits. The Bureau also ordered FBL to cease operating the station immediately. Invoking the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • EMWIN Text Product Catalog
    NWS EMWIN Text Product Catalog (rev 210525) This document addresses the identification of text products appearing on the US National Weather Service (NWS) Emergency Managers Weather Information Network (EMWIN) service. Information on the image products on the EMWIN service is published here: https://www.weather.gov/media/emwin/EMWIN_Image_and_Text_Data_Capture_Catalog_v1.3d.pdf The information in this document identifies the data used by the NWS in the operation of the EMWIN dissemination service. The EMWIN service is available to the public on the NESDIS HRIT/EMWIN satellite broadcast from the GOES-East (GOES-16) and GOES-West (GOES-17) satellites, and on the NWS EMWIN FTP file service. Further information is available on the Documents tab of the NWS EMWIN web page: https://www.weather.gov/emwin/ Text products on the EMWIN service may be separated into two groups: International Products. International products – those received from countries outside the United States (US), its possessions and territories – are formatted to WMO standards per WMO Pub 386. Appendix A - AWDS Table, provides an explicit list of International text products by WMO header. Note - The US National Weather Service does release a smaller set of products grouped with the International Products by virtue of the absence of an AWIPS ID on the line immediately following the WMO header (see “US National Products” below). US National Products. US National products are formatted to WMO standards per WMO Pub 386, but include an AWIPS ID field on the line immediately following the WMO header. This field is six bytes in length consisting of four to six left-justified alpha-numeric characters and spaces to fill to the six byte field length where necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • CPUC 2015 Triennial Audit Report
    2015 TRIENNIAL SAFETY REVIEW OF SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY (SFMTA) RAIL TRANSIT SAFETY BRANCH SAFETY AND ENFORCEMENT DIVISION CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION 505 VAN NESS AVENUE SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 November 10, 2016 Final Report Elizaveta Malashenko, Director Safety and Enforcement Division 2015 TRIENNIAL SAFETY REVIEW OF SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY (SFMTA) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The California Public Utilities Commission’s Rail Transit Safety Branch (RTSB) staff conducted this system safety program review. Staff members directly responsible for conducting safety review and inspection activities include: Daren Gilbert – Program Manager Stephen Artus – Program & Project Supervisor Steve Espinal – Senior Utilities Engineer, Supervisor Jimmy Xia – Utilities Engineer – SFMTA Representative Raed Dwairi – Utilities Engineer – Joey Bigornia – Utilities Engineer Mike Borer –Supervisor Sherman Boyd – Signal Inspector Debbie Dziadzio –Operations Inspector Adam Freeman – Mechanical Inspector Robert Hansen – Utilities Engineer – AirTrain Representative Howard Huie – Utilities Engineer – LACMTA Representative Claudia Lam – Senior Utilities Engineer, Specialist David Leggett – Senior Utilities Engineer, Specialist John Madriaga –Track Inspector James Matus – Mechanical Inspector Kevin McDonald –Track Inspector Arun Mehta – Utilities Engineer Paul Renteria – Bridge Inspector Rupa Shitole – Utilities Engineer Yan Solopov – Regulatory Analyst Colleen Sullivan – Utilities Engineer Michael Warren – Utilities Engineer
    [Show full text]