Cape Mountain Zebra (Equus Zebra Zebra)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cape Mountain Zebra (Equus Zebra Zebra) Cape Mountain Zebra (Equus zebra zebra) Figure 1. Distribution records for Cape Mountain Zebra (Equus zebra zebra) within the assessment region (global range). THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ Table 1. Countries of occurrence within southern Africa Country Presence Origin Botswana Absent — Lesotho Absent — Mozambique Absent — Namibia Absent — South Africa: Eastern Cape Extant Native South Africa: Western Cape Extant Native South Africa: Free State Extant Introduced South Africa: Northern Cape Extant Native & Introduced Swaziland Absent — Zimbabwe Absent — Figure 2. Historical distribution of Cape Mountain Zebra (Equus zebra zebra) within the assessment region: background colours represent biomes (source: Boshoff et al. 2015). Table 2. Subpopulation numbers of Cape Mountain Zebra (Equus zebra zebra) aggregated by province, 2009 to 2014/15. Inside No. of Sub- Sub- Mature Mature natural reserves/ population population 55% 75% Province Type distribution properties total total range (2009, 2014) (2009) (2013-2015) Eastern Cape Formally protected Yes 6 1,022 1,903 1,047 11,427 Private Yes 10, 26 319 868 477 651 Northern Cape Formally protected Yes 2 34 35 19 26 Western Cape Formally protected Yes 10 821 1,179 648 884 Private Yes 23, 27 473 628 345 471 Free State Formally protected No 1 93 112 62 84 Private No 1 Unknown 8 4 6 Northern Cape Private No Unknown Unknown Unknown Total formally protected (eligible) 18 3,117 1,714 2,338 Total privately protected (eligible) 53 1,496 823 1,122 Extrapolated total eligible (81%) 53 1,212 666 909 Grand total 55 4,733 2,603 3,550 Total eligible adjusted 53 4,329 2,381 3,247 Table 3. Use and trade summary for the Cape Mountain Zebra (Equus zebra zebra). Category Applicable? Rationale Proportion of total harvest Trend Subsistence use Yes Localised bushmeat consumption. Minimal. Stable Commercial use Yes — 100% Stable No hunting from formally Translocations/sales occur in most protected protected areas, only Harvest from wild population Yes Stable areas as part of management plans. translocations and game sales to the private sector. Hunting is minimal. Harvest from ranched population Yes All private populations considered here. Translocations/sales are the Increasing majority. Six populations may be considered captive- breeding populations, totaling 143 individuals Harvest from captive population Yes Minimal. Increasing in 2015. Individuals from these populations are sold to privately-owned, managed areas. Table 4. Possible net effects of wildlife ranching on the Cape Mountain Zebra (Equus zebra zebra) and subsequent management recommendations. Net effect Positive Data quality Estimated Private landowners have successfully increased total population size and Rationale available habitat Cooperate with provincial authorities in implementing a scientifically sound Management metapopulation plan aimed at creating a genetically diverse and resilient recommendation population. Table 5. Threats to the Cape Mountain Zebra (Equus zebra zebra) ranked in order of severity with corresponding evidence (based on IUCN threat categories, with regional context). Evidence in the Data Scale of Rank Threat description Current trend scientific literature quality study 1 5.1.1 Hunting & Collecting Terrestrial Sasidharan et al. Empirical Regional Increasing due to proliferation of small, Animals: historical overhunting caused a 2011 isolated private subpopulations and lack of population bottleneck of 30 individuals. biodiversity and metapopulation management Current stresses 2.3.5 Inbreeding and 2.3.6 plan. Skewed Sex Ratios: continued loss of genetic diversity through inbreeding and skewed sex ratios. Smith et al. 2008 Indirect Local Subpopulations with low genetic diversity shown to be susceptible to sarcoid outbreaks. 2 8.2.2 Problematic Native Species: Taplin et al. 2015 Empirical Local Suspected to be increasing due to continued Hatmann’s Mountain and Plains Zebra. co-occurrence of Cape Mountain Zebra, Current stress 2.3.1 Hybridisation. Hartmann’s Mountain Zebra and Plains Zebra. Hraber & Kerley Empirical National 28% of population is currently at risk of 2015 hybridization, while 35% has been previously exposed to hybridization threat. 3 3.2.2 Livestock Farming & Ranching: fenced, Komers & Curman Indirect Global Increasing due to proliferation of small, isolated habitat patches. Current stress 2.3.7 2000 (review) isolated private subpopulations and lack of Reduced Reproductive Success: low growth biodiversity and metapopulation management rate through small founder groups. plan. Hraber & Kerley Empirical National Most subpopulations <14 individuals and have 2015 not reintroduced new individuals in past ten years. 4 5.1 Hunting & Collecting Terrestrial Animals: Milner et al. 2007 Indirect Global Increasing due to growing demand for trophy unregulated hunting. Current stresses 2.3.6 (review) hunting and offtake not connected to Skewed Sex Ratios and 2.3.7 Reduced Biodiversity Management Plan. Reproductive Success: reduced growth rate through skewed sex ratio and disruption of social systems. Evidence in the Data Scale of Rank Threat description Current trend scientific literature quality study 5 2.1 Annual & Perennial Non-timber Crops: Weel et al. 2015 Indirect Local Stable. Core protected areas are fragmented farmlands fragment available habitat. Current and often confined to mountainous regions, stresses 1.2 Ecosystem Degradation and 1.3 thus inhibiting access to nutrient-rich lowlands. Indirect Ecosystem Effects: degradation and However, some formally protected areas have fragmentation of remaining ecosystems limits Strauss 2015 Indirect Regional increased in size in the last 5-10 years. resource availability and subpopulation growth. 6 8.2.2 Problematic Native Species: Lion and — Anecdotal — Increasing due to continuing reintroduction of Cheetah reintroduced into protected areas. carnivores onto formally protected and private Current stress 2.1 Species Mortality: nature reserves. increased predation from high predator densities. Table 6. Conservation interventions for the Cape Mountain Zebra (Equus zebra zebra) ranked in order of effectiveness with corresponding evidence (based on IUCN action categories, with regional context). Evidence in the Data Scale of Current conservation Rank Intervention description scientific quality evidence Demonstrated impact projects literature 1 3.3.1 Reintroduction: Hraber & Kerley Review National Mean annual growth rate was 10% Cape Mountain Zebra translocations and reintroductions 2015 from 2002-2009 compared to 8.6% Research Project, Nelson under a metapopulation strategy from 1985-1995. The % on privately Mandela Metropolitan as informed by a Biodiversity owned land rose from 14% in 1998 University. Management Plan, including both to 32% in 2009. private and formally protected areas. 2 3.1.2 Trade Management: Taplin et al. 2015 Empirical — Detected hybrids were removed. SANParks translocated animals to be subject to genetic testing to detect and euthanise hybrids to prevent spread of hybrid genes. 3 1.1 Site/Area Protection: formal — Anecdotal — Gamkaberg expanded to include CapeNature protected area expansion to grassy areas. include grassy habitats. 4 1.2 Resource & Habitat Protection: — Anecdotal — — Biodiversity Stewardship biodiversity stewardship as programme, CapeNature (e.g., potential reintroduced sites. Denel Overberg Test Range). 5 2.1 Site/Area Management: Watson et al. Indirect Local Subpopulation growth spurts (80% — habitat management of patches or 2005 of growth in Gamka Nature private lands using integrated fire Reserve) following burns. thresholds aimed at maintaining Watson & Indirect Local landscape diversity inclusive of Chadwick 2007 grass-rich areas. 6 6.3 Market Forces and 6.4 — Anecdotal — — — Conservation Payments: designing incentives for private landowners to participate in biodiversity stewardship and metapopulation management. Table 7. Data Sources & Quality: Information and interpretation qualifiers for the Cape Mountain Zebra (Equus zebra zebra) assessment. Data sources Census (literature and unpublished), field study (literature and unpublished Data quality (max.) Observed Data quality (min.) Estimated Uncertainty resolution Confidence intervals Risk tolerance Evidentiary References: Boschoff, A.F., Landman, M. and Kerley, G. 2015. Filling the gaps on the maps: historical distribution patterns of some larger mammals in part of southern Africa. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa 70: 1-65. Hraber, H. and Kerley, G.I.H. 2015. Cape Mountain Zebra 2014/15 Status Report. Report 63. Centre for African Conservation Ecology, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa. Komers, P.E. and Curman, G.P. 2000. The effect of demographic characteristics on the success of ungulate re-introductions. Biological Conservation 93: 187-193. Milner, J.M., Nilsen, E.B. and Andreassen, H.P. 2007. Demographic side effects of selective hunting in ungulates and carnivores. Conservation Biology 21: 36-47. Sasidharan, S.P., Ludwig, A., Harper, C., Moodley, Y., Bertschinger, H.J. and Guthrie, A.J. 2011. Comparative genetics of sarcoid tumour-affected and non-affected mountain zebra (Equus zebra) populations. South African Journal of Wildlife Research 41: 36-49. Smith, R.K., Marais, A., Chadwick, P., Lloyd, P.H. and Hill, R.A. 2008. Monitoring and management of the endangered Cape mountain zebra Equus zebra zebra in the Western Cape, South Africa. African Journal of Ecology 46: 207-213. Strauss, T. 2015. Cape mountain zebra
Recommended publications
  • Classification
    Biology Classification Zebras have a distinctive striped pattern that makes them easily recognizable to most people, but they also display features common to many other animals. So how can we easily compare animals? This is a print version of an interactive online lesson. To sign up for the real thing or for curriculum details about the lesson go to www.cosmoslessons.com Introduction: Classication Why do zebras have stripes? It’s a question that scientists have been asking for more than 100 years but now new research may nally have an answer. Most animal species have developed distinctive colours and patterns to help disguise them in their natural environment. Like a soldier’s camouage, the colouring and patterns look like the background, so it's hard to tell the dierence between the animal and its surroundings. But zebras live on brown grassy plains and their stripes make them stand out, not disappear. They may as well be holding signs for the lions saying, “come and eat me”. Now we may have the answer. By studying where most zebras live, scientists have found that the animals share their home with lots of nasty biting tsetse ies and horse ies. They also discovered that these ies don’t like striped patterns and will stay away from them. So, it’s likely that the zebras developed stripes to act as an insect repellent. That may sound crazy – to make yourself a target for lions just to keep away the ies. But these aren’t ordinary irritating ies. Tsetse ies carry diseases that can kill, while horse ies tear the animals’ skins leaving them at risk of infections.
    [Show full text]
  • Dheer, Arjun. 2016. Resource Partitioning Between Spotted Hyenas
    University of Southampton 16th August 2016 FACULTY OF NATURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES CENTRE FOR BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES RESOURCE PARTITIONING BETWEEN SPOTTED HYENAS (CROCUTA CROCUTA) AND LIONS (PANTHERA LEO) Arjun Dheer A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of M.Res. Wildlife Conservation. 1 As the nominated University supervisor of this M.Res. project by Arjun Dheer, I confirm that I have had the opportunity to comment on earlier drafts of the report prior to submission of the dissertation for consideration of the award of M.Res. Wildlife Conservation. Signed………………………………….. UoS Supervisor’s name: Prof. C. Patrick Doncaster As the nominated Marwell Wildlife supervisor of this M.Res. project by Arjun Dheer, I confirm that I have had the opportunity to comment on earlier drafts of the report prior to submission of the dissertation for consideration of the award of M.Res. Wildlife Conservation. Signed…………………………………… MW Supervisor’s name: Dr. Zeke Davidson 2 Abstract The negative impact of anthropogenic activities on wildlife has led to protected areas being set aside to prevent human-wildlife conflict. These protected areas are often small and fenced in order to meet the needs of expanding human communities and to conserve wildlife. This creates challenges for the management of wide-ranging animals such as large carnivores, especially those that compete with one another for limited resources. This study focused on resource partitioning between GPS-GSM collared spotted hyenas (hereafter referred to as hyenas) and lions in Lewa Wildlife Conservancy (LWC) and Borana Conservancy (BC), Kenya. Scat analysis revealed that hyenas and lions show a high degree of dietary overlap, though hyenas have broader diets and feed on livestock species, which lions completely avoid.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Goals for the Cape Mountain Zebra Equus Zebra Zebra—Security in Numbers?
    Conservation goals for the Cape mountain zebra Equus zebra zebra—security in numbers? H ALSZKA H RABAR and G RAHAM I. H. KERLEY Abstract The target of the 2002 IUCN Action Plan for the required to achieve the conservation objectives. However, Cape mountain zebra Equus zebra zebra was for a popu- such compromised targets may also be influenced by a poor lation of 2,500 animals. We assessed the validity of this goal understanding of the needs of a species for survival, as well by reviewing the conservation status of the subspecies and as underestimation of the potential to achieve larger, more the prospects of achieving larger populations. All subpopu- reliable, conservation targets. An example of the former is lations were identified and data on each were collected by where conservation targets for many large mammal species means of a questionnaire survey. The total extant Cape have been set based on earlier estimates of minimum viable mountain zebra population was found to consist of at least populations with an effective population size of c. 500 (e.g. 2,790 individuals in 52 subpopulations. The target number Lande & Barrowclough, 1987; Armbruster & Lande, 1993). of 2,500 has therefore been exceeded and this success is This figure of 500 is, however, based on maintaining genetic largely attributable to the private sector, as there are at variation in leg hair patterns in fruit flies and is 30 years old present double the number of privately owned subpopu- (Franklin, 1980) and outdated. Recent estimates have been lations (35) compared to formally protected subpopulations consistently higher than this (Reed et al., 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology and Habitat Suitability of Cape Mountain Zebra (Equus Zebra Zebra) in the Western Cape, South Africa
    Ecology and habitat suitability of Cape mountain zebra (Equus zebra zebra) in the Western Cape, South Africa by Adriaan Jacobus Olivier Thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Masters of Science at Stellenbosch University Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Faculty of AgriScience Supervisor: Dr Alison J. Leslie Co-supervisor: Dr Jason I. Ransom December 2019 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Jaco Olivier December 2019 Copyright © 2019 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved ii Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Abstract Endemic to South Africa, the Cape mountain zebra (Equus zebra zebra) historically occurred throughout the Western Cape, and parts of the Northern and Eastern Cape. However, due to human impacts fewer than 50 individuals remained by the 1950’s. Conservation efforts over the past 50 years have resulted in the population increasing to over 4700 individuals and having moved on the IUCN red list, from Critically Endangered to Least Concern. As there are still many isolated meta-populations, CapeNature established a Biodiversity Management Plan for the conservation of Cape mountain zebra in the Western Cape. In 2001, 15 (six males and nine females) Cape mountain zebra was reintroduced into Bakkrans Nature Reserve, situated in the Cederberg Wilderness Area of South Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammal Species Richness at a Catena and Nearby Waterholes During a Drought, Kruger National Park, South Africa
    diversity Article Mammal Species Richness at a Catena and Nearby Waterholes during a Drought, Kruger National Park, South Africa Beanélri B. Janecke Animal, Wildlife & Grassland Sciences, University of the Free State, 205 Nelson Mandela Road, Park West, Bloemfontein 9301, South Africa; [email protected]; Tel.: +27-51-401-9030 Abstract: Catenas are undulating hillslopes on a granite geology characterised by different soil types that create an environmental gradient from crest to bottom. The main aim was to determine mammal species (>mongoose) present on one catenal slope and its waterholes and group them by feeding guild and body size. Species richness was highest at waterholes (21 species), followed by midslope (19) and sodic patch (16) on the catena. Small differences observed in species presence between zones and waterholes and between survey periods were not significant (p = 0.5267 and p = 0.9139). In total, 33 species were observed with camera traps: 18 herbivore species, 10 carnivores, two insectivores and three omnivores. Eight small mammal species, two dwarf antelopes, 11 medium, six large and six mega-sized mammals were observed. Some species might not have been recorded because of drought, seasonal movement or because they travelled outside the view of cameras. Mammal presence is determined by food availability and accessibility, space, competition, distance to water, habitat preferences, predators, body size, social behaviour, bound to territories, etc. The variety in body size and feeding guilds possibly indicates a functioning catenal ecosystem. This knowledge can be beneficial in monitoring and conservation of species in the park. Keywords: catena ecosystem; ephemeral mud wallows; habitat use; mammal variety; Skukuza area; Citation: Janecke, B.B.
    [Show full text]
  • Plains Zebra (<I>Equus Quagga</I>)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln U.S. National Park Service Publications and Papers National Park Service 1-7-2020 Plains Zebra (Equus quagga) Behaviour in a Restored Population Reveals Seasonal Resource Limitations Charli de Vos Stellenbosch University, [email protected] Alison J. Leslie Stellenbosch University, [email protected] Jason I. Ransom United States National Park Service, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natlpark Part of the Environmental Education Commons, Environmental Policy Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Fire Science and Firefighting Commons, Leisure Studies Commons, Natural Resource Economics Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Nature and Society Relations Commons, Other Environmental Sciences Commons, Physical and Environmental Geography Commons, Public Administration Commons, and the Recreation, Parks and Tourism Administration Commons Vos, Charli de; Leslie, Alison J.; and Ransom, Jason I., "Plains Zebra (Equus quagga) Behaviour in a Restored Population Reveals Seasonal Resource Limitations" (2020). U.S. National Park Service Publications and Papers. 200. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natlpark/200 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the National Park Service at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in U.S. National Park Service Publications and Papers by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 224 (2020) 104936 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Applied Animal Behaviour Science journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/applanim Plains zebra (Equus quagga) behaviour in a restored population reveals seasonal resource limitations T Charli de Vosa, Alison J. Leslieb, Jason I.
    [Show full text]
  • Landman Etal. Habitat Suitability Assessements for Namaqualand
    A habitat suitability assessment for the introduction of Black Rhinoceros and Mountain Zebra to the Namaqua National Park and Upland priority region in the Succulent Karoo Biome M. Landman, A.M. Shrader and G.I.H. Kerley Terrestrial Ecology Research Unit Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University Port Elizabeth Report No. C110 6031 May 2006 A habitat suitability assessment for the introduction of Black Rhinoceros and Mountain Zebra to the Namaqua National Park and Upland priority region in the Succulent Karoo Biome M. Landman, A.M. Shrader and G.I.H. Kerley Terrestrial Ecology Research Unit PO Box 77000 Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University Port Elizabeth, 6031 Report No. C110 May 2006 Report to: Conservation International Foundation - South Africa Kirstenbosch National Botanical Gardens Cape Town, 7735 CONTENTS Page 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2. TERMS OF REFERENCE 2 3. INTRODUCTION 3 4. PROPOSED AREAS 4 5. APPROACH 5 6. MOUNTAIN ZEBRA Equus zebra 6.1 Historical occurrence 9 6.2 Ecological requirements and general biology 10 6.3 Habitat suitability assessment 6.3.1 Platbakkies 11 6.3.2 Spoegriver 13 6.3.3 Rooiberg catchment 14 6.3.4 Namaqua National Park 17 6.4 Summary & Recommendations 20 6.4.1 Reintroduction strategy 21 6.4.2 Potential carrying capacity 22 7. BLACK RHINOCEROS Diceros bicornis 7.1 Historical occurrence 24 2.2 Ecological requirements and general biology 25 7.3 Habitat suitability assessment 7.3.1 Namaqua National Park 26 7.4 Summary & Recommendations 28 8. POTENTIAL FOR OTHER HERBIVORE RE-INTRODUCTIONS 28 9. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 29 10. REFERENCES 29 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The aim of the study was to determine the potential suitability of areas in Namaqualand for the introduction of mountain zebra and black rhinoceros.
    [Show full text]
  • Equus Zebra Zebra) T
    IJP: Parasites and Wildlife 9 (2019) 130–133 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect IJP: Parasites and Wildlife journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijppaw Translocation a potential corridor for equine piroplasms in Cape mountain zebra (Equus zebra zebra) T Rae Marvin Smitha,b, Raksha Vasantrai Bhoorac, Antoinette Kotzéa,b, J. Paul Groblerb, ∗ Desiré Lee Daltona,b, a Research and Scientific Services, National Zoological Garden, South African National Biodiversity Institute, 232 Boom Street, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa b Department of Genetics, University of the Free State, 205 Nelson Mandela Drive, Bloemfontein, 9300, South Africa c Epidemiology, Parasites and Vectors, Agricultural Research Council, Onderstepoort Veterinary Research, Onderstepoort, 0110, South Africa ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Translocation of animals in fragmented habitats is an important means of dispersal and gene flow, however, the Cape mountain zebra movement of animals has led to the spread of various diseases globally and wildlife are often the reservoirs of Equus zebra zebra these diseases. Currently, Cape mountain zebra are translocated within South Africa as a management method Translocation for augmentation of isolated and fragmented populations. The movement of pathogens due to translocations in Piroplasm local regions have gone largely unchecked, particularly where there may still be isolated regions that can be Babesia caballi negatively affected. Equine piroplasmosis is a tick-borne disease caused by Theilaria equi and/or Babesia caballi Theilaria equi reported to occur in equids (Bhoora et al., 2010; Zweygarth et al., 2002). Here, the presence of T. equi and B. caballi was detected in 137 clinically healthy Cape mountain zebra from three South African reserves, Mountain Zebra National Park (MZNP), De Hoop Nature Reserve (DHNR) and Karoo National Park (KNP) using the multiplex EP real-time PCR (qPCR) assay.
    [Show full text]
  • Speciation with Gene Flow in Equids Despite Extensive Chromosomal Plasticity
    Speciation with gene flow in equids despite extensive chromosomal plasticity Hákon Jónssona,1, Mikkel Schuberta,1, Andaine Seguin-Orlandoa,b,1, Aurélien Ginolhaca, Lillian Petersenb, Matteo Fumagallic,d, Anders Albrechtsene, Bent Petersenf, Thorfinn S. Korneliussena, Julia T. Vilstrupa, Teri Learg, Jennifer Leigh Mykag, Judith Lundquistg, Donald C. Millerh, Ahmed H. Alfarhani, Saleh A. Alquraishii, Khaled A. S. Al-Rasheidi, Julia Stagegaardj, Günter Straussk, Mads Frost Bertelsenl, Thomas Sicheritz-Pontenf, Douglas F. Antczakh, Ernest Baileyg, Rasmus Nielsenc, Eske Willersleva, and Ludovic Orlandoa,2 aCentre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, DK-1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark; bNational High-Throughput DNA Sequencing Center, DK-1353 Copenhagen K, Denmark; cDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; dUCL Genetics Institute, Department of Genetics, Evolution, and Environment, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom; eThe Bioinformatics Centre, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark; fCentre for Biological Sequence Analysis, Department of Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark; gMaxwell H. Gluck Equine Research Center, Veterinary Science Department, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546; hBaker Institute for Animal Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853; iZoology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia; jRee Park, Ebeltoft Safari, DK-8400 Ebeltoft, Denmark; kTierpark Berlin-Friedrichsfelde, 10319 Berlin, Germany; and lCentre for Zoo and Wild Animal Health, Copenhagen Zoo, DK-2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark Edited by Andrew G. Clark, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, and approved October 27, 2014 (received for review July 3, 2014) Horses, asses, and zebras belong to a single genus, Equus,which Conservation of Nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Zebra Fact Sheet
    ZEBRA FACT SHEET STATUS: The Plains Zebra (Equus quagga, formerly Equus burchelli) is the most common, and has or had about five subspecies distributed across much of southern and eastern Africa. It, or particular subspecies of it, have also been known as the Common Zebra, the Dauw, Burchell's Zebra (actually the extinct subspecies, Equus quagga burchelli), and the Quagga (another extinct subspecies, Equus quagga quagga). The Mountain Zebra (Equus zebra) of southwest Africa tends to have a sleek coat with a white belly and narrower stripes than the Plains Zebra. It has two subspecies and is classified as endangered. Grevy's Zebra (Equus grevyi) is the largest type, with an erect mane, and a long, narrow head making it appear rather mule like. It is a creature of the semi arid grasslands of Ethiopia, Somalia, and northern Kenya. It is endangered too. There are two subspecies of mountain zebra. Equus zebra is endangered and Equus zebra hartmannae is threatened. DESCRIPTION: Zebras have black and white stripes all over their bodies except their stomachs, which are white. They have four one-toed hoofs. Their slender, pointed ears reach up to eight inches in length. Zebras have manes of short hair that stick straight up from their necks. The stripes on their bodies continue to the mane. They also have a tuft of hair at the end of their tails. The Grevy's Zebra differs from all other zebras in its primitive characteristics and different behavior. SIZE: Zebras reach six to eight-and-a-half feet in length. Their tails are an additional one-and-a-half feet long.
    [Show full text]
  • Lion (Panthera Leo Melanochaita) Diet in Relation to Prey Preference and Density in Meru National Park, Kenya
    Lion (Panthera leo melanochaita) diet in relation to prey preference and density in Meru National Park, Kenya MSc Research Project Report 2019 – 2020 Mateo Bal MSc Biodiversity, Conservation and Restoration Evolutionary Ecology Group Department of Biology Institute of Environmental Sciences Antwerp University Leiden University Research supervisors: Prof. Dr. Ir. Hans H. de Iongh (Leiden University, Leo Foundation) MSc Luka L. Narisha (Kenya Wildlife Service) Lion (Panthera leo melanochaita) diet in relation to prey preference and density in Meru National Park, Kenya Mateo Bal s0185753 This research project was developed within a collaborative framework between the University of Antwerp, the Institute of Environmental Sciences of Leiden University, Kenya Wildlife Service, the Leo Foundation and the Born Free Foundation. Submitted to obtain the master’s degree in biology - specialisation Biodiversity, Conservation and Restoration. 2 ABSTRACT The African lion (Panthera leo) plays a key role in savannah ecosystems by directly and indirectly regulating trophic structure. Their foraging behavior has frequently been described as opportunistic, but often reveals a distinct preference for certain prey species that are energetically more profitable. This research project focussed on the population structure and diet of lions in Kenya’s Meru National Park. Data were collected from February until April 2019 and contribute to the PhD research of MSc Luka Narisha. A total of 28 lions were identified during fieldwork, indicating a lion density of 2.2 adult lions per 100 km2. Transect counts of potential prey species in the park revealed that Kirk’s dik-dik (Madoqua kirkii) had the highest relative abundance of all prey species (50.89%), while African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) contributed the most to the total prey biomass (33.94%).
    [Show full text]
  • Risks and Causes of Mortalities in Wild Ungulates of Tanzania
    RISKS AND CAUSES OF MORTALITIES IN WILD UNGULATES OF TANZANIA 1Mbassa GK, 2Pereka AE, 3Matovelo JA, 4Mgasa MN, 5Kaita M, 1Mwangalimi MO Departments of Veterinary 1Anatomy, 2Physiology, Biochemistry, Pharmacology, Toxicology, 3Pathology, 4Surgery and Theriogenology, Sokoine University of Agriculture, P. O. Box 3016 Morogoro, 5Department of Wildlife, Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism, P. O Box 636 Morogoro Tanzania ABSTRACT Habitat and forensic studies in Mkomazi, Saadani and Selous game reserves and Longido, Gonabis and Doma-Mkata protected areas of Tanzania indicate fires, poachers, hunters, predators, lack of feed and water due to habitat deterioration, agriculture and livestock to pose high risk to survival of plains zebra, buffalo, blue wildebeest, eland, hartebeest, impala, Thomson’s and Grant’s gazelles. Wildebeests and buffaloes suffer high mortality rates followed by hartebeests, elands, zebras and giraffes, the causes being trauma due to wire snares, bullets and predators. Animals acquire intelligence and develop survival strategies including knowledge of being a target species, man and predator preferences, home range for safety, borders of reserve areas, protectors, tools held by man and maintain minimum distances from strangers, perform sudden, fast irregular movements and vertical jumps to avoid being targeted, females separate from males while running and animals migration from high risk areas to safe places. Measurement of risks and causes of deaths is prerequisite to prediction of population trends and developing effective wildlife conservation strategies and as shown by this study ethology, habitant examination, forensic diagnosis on dead animal remains and migrations are useful information sources. INTRODUCTION Wild ungulates are of great economic importance in East Africa and their utilisation for food and export is increasing.
    [Show full text]