DOCSLIB.ORG

ECOROADS Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ECOROADS Project ECOROADS Project Guidelines for submitting a candidature for test sites Table of contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Template of the candidature package ....................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Name of the test site ......................................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Relevance of the test site .................................................................................................................. 2 2.3 Location (country, town) ................................................................................................................... 3 2.4 Lay out ............................................................................................................................................... 4 2.5 General Description ........................................................................................................................... 5 2.6 Location ............................................................................................................................................. 7 2.7 Organisation of the transport to the site. ......................................................................................... 8 2.8 Safety measures ................................................................................................................................ 8 2.9 Period(s) in which the site will be available for the inspection ......................................................... 9 2.10 Letter of commitment (compulsory) ................................................................................................. 9 3 Ranking criteria ........................................................................................................................................ 12 1 Introduction This guide is intended for those that would like to submit a test site candidature for joint safety operations within the ECOROADS project. The objective of the ECOROADS project is the establishment of a common enhanced approach to road infrastructure and tunnel safety management by organising: - Workshops with the stakeholders (tunnels and road managers), which will include the analysis/review of national practices regarding RSI/RSA, starting from the results of the two studies launched by DG MOVE to assess the impact of the two Directives. The first workshop will be held at the beginning of the project, in order to check their needs and expectations; the second one after the first set of the “field operations” to check the first results and fine tune the second set of operations. A final workshop will analyse the overall results and issue the guidelines. - Exchange of best practices and experiences between European tunnel experts and road safety professionals. - Pilot joint safety operations in some European road sections having both open roads and tunnels. Tunnel operations will be conducted by tunnel experts accompanied by road safety experts (as observers) and vice-versa. The team conducting the operation will explain the concepts of the survey to the observers and the final report will include an appendix with their comments. In this 1 way, an actual cross-fertilisation between the two groups of experts will lead to an enhanced approach to road infrastructure safety management. For the joint safety operations, the plan is to conduct inspection and/or audit1 on 5 test sites (a road stretch including a minimum 500 m tunnel section). In the first months of the project the actual candidatures of the sites will be finalized and the definitive decision will be taken during the first workshop scheduled in September 2015. In order to speed up the process these guidelines show how to propose a test site and how each proposal will be ranked. Project partners may propose one or more test sites, both for inspection or audit, considering that there will be very few audits (in comparison to inspections); such proposals may be submitted also for sites not included in the initial list complied during preparation of the ECOROADS proposal. External candidatures, proposed by organisations not directly involved in ECOROADS, are also eligible. Even though the ECOROADS project plans to conduct safety operations on 5 test sites, this number could be increased depending on the availability of budget. The final ranking of the tests sites will be done by an internal committee composed by one representative of each of the six main partners. Kindly complete the template below with information about the proposed test site. Instructions are given as “comments”. Please note that some information (and pictures) is provided as examples only. 2 The candidature 2.1 Tunnel Strazevica Tunnel is proposed for Road Safety Inspection and Road Safety Audit. At the moment, tunnel manager is the Public Enterprise “Roads of Serbia”. Right tunnel tube is made and opened for traffic. The traffic in the existing state takes place as a two-way (one lane in each direction). This mode of transport will be in operation until the completion of the second tunnel tube, when the two tubes of the tunnel to be dedicated to one direction. As the tunnel is operational, this tube is proposed for Road Safety Inspection. Work on the construction of the left tunnel tubes are partially derived (about 115 m). This tube is proposed for Road Safety Audit for Phase 2: Detailed Stage. 2.2 Relevance of the test site Belgrade Bypass is planned as a road motorway and is part of Corridor 10. This section has been designed with two separate carriageways, each width at 11.50 m. 1 In the following chapters, the term “inspection” refers to a safety evaluation carried out along an existing road/tunnel (i.e. already in operation for several years). The term “audit” refers to a safety evaluation carried out at design stage (different stages are possible: from draft design to early operation). 2 The present road is certainly one of the most important sections of the Corridor 10. Such status can be explained by the fact that it shares with overlapping of two international roads E70 and E75. Consequently, traffic has international transit character to Budapest in the north, to the west of Zagreb, as well as to Sofia and Thessaloniki in the south. Also, on this section of the future highway, as it is currently in operation only one lane for both directions of driving, there is a significant domestic traffic transit and source-target character. For traffic was opened right tunnel tube in the direction of increase chainage, resp. in the direction of vehicle movement north-south. The length of this tunnel is 745 m. The tunnel is designed as part of future highway and intended for one direction of travel, with two traffic lanes and 2 x 3.75 m and an emergency lane width of 3.0 m. Since this transitional phase takes place two-way traffic, lanes on the entire section of the access road to the tunnel in both directions, as well as on the section of the tunnel tube, was marked by pavement markings as follows: formed a symmetrical cross section, with one lane width of 3,50 m for each direction of travel, as well as one emergency lane for each direction of travel. Speed traffic flow is limited to 100 km / h. Belgrade bypass is section of strategic importance. Upon completion of works in the full profile of the motorway, it will provide the conditions for the development of transit traffic without compromising traffic flows within the road network of the city of Belgrade. Also, it is important to note that on this road under such conditions can expect a significant increase in the level of traffic safety. In this context, only good design solution for the two tubes of the tunnel Strazevica can provide installation of all modern subsystems within the main traffic management systems in the concerned section. 2.3 Location (Serbia, Belgrade) 3 2.4 Lay out - tunnel length, 745 m - number of tubes, 2 tubes, 1 under traffic, 1 in the works - number of lanes, 2 traffic lanes into each tube - longitudinal profile, 0.27 – 0.40 % - bi-directional traffic - traffic volume per tube, about 14500 vehicles - presence and percentage of heavy goods vehicles, 22 % - lane width, 3.50 m per lane in this phase - speed considerations, 100 km/h out of tunnel, 80 km/h in tunnel - elevation is about 130 – 170 meters above sea level - continental climate 4 2.5 General Description Belgrade Bypass is part of the highway A1 and extends from multilevel intersection Batajnica, through Dobanovci near Belgrade node (intersection of two highway route E70 and E75), then through the intersection Ostruznica, Orlovaca crossroads, crossroads Avala and finally to node Bubanj Potok. The present tunnel Ostruznica is located within the sector 5, between the intersections Orlovaca and Avala. The bypass has a full profile of one part of the highway between Batajnica and Dobanovci. Other sectors are built with one lane, which takes place two-way traffic. This section is marked with pavement markings as symmetrical profile, with bands of 2 x 3.50 m hard shoulders which are smaller than the dimensions set out in the regulations. The speed is limited to 100 km / h, with the exception of the present tunnel Strazevica where is speed limit - 80 km / h. Since the vertical alignment of this section primarily built as a stretched route in flat terrain, except for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Information Current As of November 18, 2020
    Information Current as of November 18, 2020 Table of Contents SOURCEREE PERSPECTIVE ............................................................................................3 OVERVIEW .........................................................................................................................6 WEBSITES ...........................................................................................................................6 OWNERSHIP .......................................................................................................................6 OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................................................6 FINANCIAL INTENTIONS .................................................................................................7 THE EFFECT ON AMERICA .............................................................................................8 ECONOMIC CORRIDORS .................................................................................................9 FUNDING .......................................................................................................................... 11 APPENDIX A: PROGRAM LEADERSHIP ....................................................................... 16 APPENDIX B: ASSOCIATED ENTITIES ......................................................................... 18 APPENDIX C: PARTICIPATING NATIONS.................................................................... 21 APPENDIX D: PROJECTS ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia 2029 Prospectus
    REPUBLIC OF SERBIA (represented by the Government of the Republic of Serbia, acting by and through the Ministry of Finance) €1,000,000,000 1.500 per cent. Notes due 2029 Issue price: 98.909 per cent. The €1,000,000,000 1.500 per cent. Notes due 2029 (the “Notes”) to be issued by the Republic of Serbia, represented by the Government of the Republic of Serbia acting by and through the Ministry of Finance (the “Issuer”) will mature on 26 June 2029 and, unless previously purchased and cancelled, will be redeemed at their principal amount on that date. The Notes will bear interest at a rate of 1.500 per cent. per annum. Interest will accrue on the outstanding principal amount of the Notes from and including 26 June 2019 and will be payable annually in arrear on 26 June in each year, commencing on 26 June 2020. All payments of principal and interest in respect of the Notes shall be made free and clear of, and without withholding or deduction for, any taxes, duties, assessments or governmental charges of whatever nature imposed, levied, collected, withheld or assessed by or within the Republic of Serbia (the “Republic of Serbia” or “Serbia”) or any political subdivision or any authority thereof or therein having power to tax, unless such withholding or deduction is required by law. In that event, the Issuer shall pay such additional amounts as will result in the receipt by the Noteholders of such amounts as would have been received by them if no such withholding or deduction had been required, subject to certain exceptions set out in the Conditions (as defined below).
    [Show full text]
  • ROADS of SERBIA” ZORAN DROBNJAK “When You Want to Develop an Area, Equip It with Good Roads”, Prof
    INTRODUCTION ACTING DIRECTOR OF THE PE “ROADS OF SERBIA” ZORAN DROBNJAK “When you want to develop an area, equip it with good roads”, prof. dr Milan Vujanić says and I entirely agree with this. Interdependence of industry and roads is quite evident because roads, in addition to their main function concerning the transport of people and goods, also generate growth and development of all places through which the road network passes as well as all other which are indirectly connected with motorways and other important routes in the Republic of Serbia. Thus it is the main dedication of the PE “Roads of Serbia” to achieve what is expected from us – to successfully finish all investments and provide the same level of quality of all the roads in Serbia with constant increase of the level of traffic safety, with cordial assistance of the Government of the Republic of Serbia and the Ministry of Construction, Transport and Infrastructure. This is an imperative of our work, not only because of the expectations in front of us regarding the accession to the European Union, but also because good roads are one of the pillars of every serious and modern country. Road towards the achievement of big results starts with the devotion of individuals, each one of us. Owing to an exceptional devotion of the employees in the PE “Roads of Serbia”, achievement of the adopted plans is possible, regardless of the difficulties and not always favourable work conditions which the time sets upon us. Daily perseverance, devotion and openness of our employees to new knowledge and changes is obvious.
    [Show full text]
  • China's Economic Footprint in the Western Balkans
    Jacob Mardell ASIA POLICY BRIEF China's Economic Footprint in the Western Balkans Geopolitics has returned to vogue, and the EU does not enjoy a monopoly on inuence in the Western Balkans. China is the latest player on the scene, and although its economic footprint is still relatively small, Beijing’s growing presence is a new reality that Brussels needs to contend with. China’s “no-strings attached” nancing of infrastructure potentially undermines the EU’s reform-orientated approach. Relevance Bertelsmann Stiftung Focus Bertelsmann Stiftung Forecast Bertelsmann Stiftung Information Bertelsmann Stiftung Options Bertelsmann Stiftung About the author Jacob Mardell is a freelance researcher and journalist who has recently travelled Eurasia exploring China’s Belt and Road Initiative. He is writing a series of articles, "On the New Silk Road,". Since March, he has traveled overland from the UK to Beijing. Over the next ve months he will be travelling in Southeast Asia, returning to Europe over sea, via Djibouti and Ethiopia. Beijing’s approach China’s economic presence in the Western Balkans Six (WB6) countries of Albania, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Kosovo, Montenegro, North Macedonia, and Serbia is framed in terms of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), a foreign policy slogan and development concept announced by Xi Jinping in 2013. Although China maintained active diplomatic relations with Yugoslavia during the 1980s and 1990s and vocally opposed the NATO bombing of Serbia and Montenegro in the late 1990s, economic outreach in the countries of former Yugoslavia only truly began (with Serbia) in the second decade of the 21st Century. Beijing’s relationship with Albania – not part of former Yugoslavia – was very close until the Sino-Albanian split of the 1970s, but this historical curiosity has little bearing on contemporary Sino-Albanian relations.
    [Show full text]
  • Corridor 10 – Better Links Between the Region and Europe
    Corridor 10 – Better Links Between the Region and Europe Dr Dušan Mladenović Association of Transport and Telecommunications Tradition Valleys of the Rivers Danube, Sava and Morava, have been some of the most important transportation corridors in the South East Europe for more than 2,000 years. Pan-European Corridors in the Balkans Corridor 10 With Its Branches крацима It runs from Austria to Greece. It includes both the railway corridor, 2,528 km long, and the road corridor, 2,300 km long. Salzburg (A) – Ljubljana (SLO) – Zagreb (HR) – Belgrade (SRB) – Niš (SRB) – Skopje (MK) – Veles (MK) – Thessaloniki (GR). * Branch A: Graz (A) - Maribor (SLO) – Zagreb (HR) * Branch B: Budapest(SRB) – Novi Sad (SRB) - Belgrade (SRB) * Branch C: Nis (SRB) – Dimitrovgrad (SRB) – Sofia (BG) - Istanbul (TR) – via corridor 4 * Branch D: Veles (MK) – Prilep (MK) - Bitola (MK) - Florina (GR) - Igoumenitsa (GR) Priority Projects of the EU Road Network 2005 New Reality 1. EU has defined its priority axes that run parallel with Corridor 10 in Serbia. The neighbouring countries construct speedily the infrastructure network in the close vicinity. 2. Road transit transport on Corridor 10 has stagnated, and an increasing trend is recorded only on the directions east-west and northeast-southwest. Network Traffic Load and Regional Traffic Flows The largest traffic load is on the passage through Belgrade, which is why construction of Belgrade Bypass is one of the priorities. Regional traffic flows through Serbia include both transit flows and Serbia’s bilateral exchange; they are most expressed on the east-west direction. Izvor: JP Putevi Srbije Freight Traffic Intensity on the Serbian Borders AADT (Trucks per day) Source: JP Putevi Srbije Traffic Volume on Corridor 10 and Number of TIR Transits Goods Vehicles 600000 500000 400000 300000 200000 100000 ec.
    [Show full text]
  • Touch & Go and Touch 2 with Go
    Touch & Go and Touch 2 with Go Autumn 2018 map update release notes 4 more pages required in Autumn edition to fit information Keeping up to date with The Toyota Map Update Release Notes Map update information these and many more features: Touch & Go (CY11) helps you stay on track with the map Full map navigation Release date: Autumn 2018 Driver-friendly full map pan-European navigation updates of the Touch & Go and Touch 2 Version: 2018 with clear visual displays for signposts, junctions and lane with Go navigation systems. Database: 2018.Q1 guidance. Media: USB stick or download by user Speed limit and safety Toyota map updates are released at least once a year System vendor: Harman camera alerts Drive safely with the help of a and at a maximum twice. Coverage: Albania, Andorra, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia Herzegovina, speed limit display and warning, including an optional Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Gibraltar, France, speed warning setting. Alerts Keep up with the product information, map changes, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Latvia, notify you of fixed safety Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macedonia (F.Y.R.O.M), Malta, Moldova, camera locations (in countries premium content and sales arguments. where it is legal). Monaco, Montenegro, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, San Marino, Serbia, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom, Vatican. Intuitive detour suggestions Real-time traffic information Contents updates* alert you to Touch 2 with Go (CY13/16) congestion ahead on your planned route. The system Map update information 3 Release date: Autumn, 2018 calculates potential delay times and suggests a detour Navigation features 4 Version: 2018 to avoid the problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Kategorije Atraktivosti Linija GS Beograd
    LINIJE I KATEGORIJE ATRAKTIVNOSTI 27 Trg Republike - Mirijevo 3 407 Voždovac - Bela Reka SVE TRAMVAJSKE LINIJE 27 E Trg Republike - Mirijevo 4 503 Voždovac - Resnik AUTOBUSKE LINIJE: 32 Vukov spomenik - Višnjica 504 Kneževac - Resnik 24 Dorćol - Neimar 32 E Trg Republike - Višnjica 542 Miljakovac 1 - Petlovo Brdo 25 Karaburma 2 - Kumodraž 2 35 Trg Republike - Lešće 32 L Omladinski stadion - Lešće 37 Pančevački most - Kneževac 36 Trg Republike - Viline Vode - Dunav stanica 101 Omladinski stadion - Padinska Skela 42 Slavija - Banjica (VMA) 43 Trg Republike - Kotež 102 Padinska Skela - Vrbovsko 48 Pančevački most - Miljakovac 2 77 Zvezdara - Bežanijska kosa 104 Omladinski stadion - Crvenka 16 Karaburma 2 - Novi Beograd 96 Trg Republike - Borča 3 105 Omladinski stadion - Ovča 51 Slavija - Bele Vode Omladinski stadion - PKB Kovilovo 23 Karaburma 2 - Vidikovac 106 26 Dorćol - Braće Jerković 55 Zvezdara - Stari Železnik - Jabučki Rit 31 Studentski trg - Konjarnik 59 Slavija - Petlovo Brdo 107 PKB Direkcija - Dunavac 53 Zeleni venac - Vidikovac 60 Zeleni venac - Novi Beograd (Toplana) 108 Omladinski stadion - MZ Reva 58 Pančevački most - Novi Železnik 67 Zeleni venac - Novi Beograd (blok 24) 109 PKB Direkcija - Čenta 65 Zvezdara 2 - Novi Beograd 68 Zeleni Venac - Novi Beograd (blok 70) 110 Padinska Skela - Široka Greda 95 Novi Beograd - Borča 3 71 Zeleni venac - Bežanija (Ledine) 202 Omladisnki stadion - Veliko selo 17 Konjarnik - Zemun (Gornji grad) 72 Zeleni venac - aerodrom Beograd 302 L Ustanička - Restoran "Boleč" 18 Medaković 3 - Zemun (Bačka) 75 Zeleni venac - Bežanijska Kosa 54 Kanarevo Brdo - Železnik - Makiš 52 Zeleni venac - Cerak Vinogradi 88 Zemun (Kej oslobođenja) - Novi Železnik 57 Banovo Brdo - Naselje Golf 56 Zeleni venac - Petlovo Brdo 91 Glavna žel.
    [Show full text]
  • Belgrade Investor Guide
    BELGRADE INVESTOR GUIDE City of the future wishes you a warm Welcome Welcome ‘Belgrade Waterfront’ is the largest project development in the city. Investment of more than €3.0 billion, Construction of 1.8 million square metres of mixed-use space, o 5,700 residential units, o 600 hotel rooms, o 120,000 square metres of office space, o 170-metre tower. The works on two residential towers with 296 apartments and a total area of 68,000 square metres commenced in September 2015. Belgrade Investor Guide 2 Contents I Project Development Office of the City of Belgrade ................................................................................... 5 II City of Belgrade .......................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Basic Data ............................................................................................................................................ 6 2.1.1 Short SWOT Analysis .................................................................................................................... 6 2.1.2 Geography .................................................................................................................................... 7 2.1.3 Demographics, Human Capital and Purchasing Power ................................................................ 7 2.1.4 Infrastructure and Science ........................................................................................................... 8 III Belgrade as a Business
    [Show full text]
  • 15. Transport Infrastructure As Development Factor of Belgrade
    GeograFF 8 15. Transport infrastructure as development factor of Belgrade Bogdan Lukić, Velimir Šećerov Development of Belgrade has been directly caused by the development of transport sys- tems. Demographic, economic and spatial expansion of the city is connected with the de- velopment of forms and systems of transport infrastructure. The periods of the develop- ment of the city are connected with historical events, but the formation of Belgrade, from the border settlement to the Balkan metropolis, reached its development culmination by the end of the Second World War in the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. The progress of transport and all other structures was recorded up to 1980. In that historical year, the stagnation in the development of Belgrade and whole Serbia had begun. The culmination was reached in the 1990s with all retrograde processes, followed by eco- nomic recession, disappearing of elementary social values and the wars. Nevertheless, during “golden seventies” of the 20th century, Belgrade succeeded to im- prove and develop transport function and transport infrastructure. Perhaps it was the consequence of the tradition of the development of the city in the period of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, with the two following illustrative examples: • “Flying Belgrade citizen“, express train, functioning from 1936 as express steam train on route from Belgrade to Zagreb, when the travel took less than 5 hours and • the first night commercial flight from Belgrade to Bucharest, more precisely, from Pančevo to Bucharest, on September 9th 1923, as a part of the commercial air line Paris-Belgrade (Pančevo)-Bucharest-Istanbul. Progressive development of transport systems of the 1960s in Europe, the Balkans, the SFRY, Serbia and very Belgrade, enabled the city to valorise the following: • intercontinental patterns, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • MAPMAKING Ǩ ARCHITECTURE Ǩ URBAN PLANNING ABOUT US Practice and Expertise
    MAPMAKING ǩ ARCHITECTURE ǩ URBAN PLANNING ABOUT US Practice and Expertise ABOUT US INAT is an international partnership with transdisciplinary teams based in Paris, Belgrade, Madrid and Hanoi. We provide our clients with innovative solutions adapted to their needs MAPMAKING through our creative research and development approach. Our experience encompasses ǩ,1$7PDSSLQJVWDQGDUG the fields of Mapmaking, Planninig and Urban design. ǩ3DULV ǩ7RN\R ǩ,QIRUPDWLRQV\VWHP Mapmaking Planning Urban design 3/$11,1* Schematic metro network diagrams Planning is a dynamic process of Successful urban environments are an essential tool for travelers discovery. It entails translating a become destinations when designed ǩ Existing network and authorities alike, they help the client's vision into a development to invite an abundance of foot traffic, ǩ Future network former navigate the transport strategy, providing a framework in programmed activities and lively network and the latter plan and which alternatives are evaluated, street scenes – combining develop- URBAN DESIGN implement urban development capacity in determined, feasibility is ment and open spaces to create an ǩ3XEOLFWUDQVSRUW policies. More importantly they are tested and a course is set - all with a exciting, viable neighborhood fabric. instrumental in shaping the identity single goal in mind – creating places Through careful planning and analy- ǩArchitecture and city of the city. These metro maps repre- where people make memories. sis, our urban projects are designed sent not only the structure of the to provide optimal benefits to the CONTACT urban fabric but reflect the paths of surrounding community while milions of people and their design addressing the complexities and and appearence is the most com- intricate relationships that tie our monly shared representation of the cities together.
    [Show full text]
  • The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized Report No: 28792-SAM for OFFICIAL USE ONLY
    Document of The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized Report No: 28792-SAM FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT Public Disclosure Authorized ON A PROPOSED CREDIT IN THE AMOUNT OF SDR 37.5 MILLION (US$55 MILLION EQUIVALENT) TO SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO FOR A Public Disclosure Authorized TRANSPORT REHABILITATION PROJECT FOR SERBIA April 27,2004 Infrastructure and Energy Department Europe and Central Asia Region [This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of I Public Disclosure Authorized ltheir official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. 1 CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective April 5,2004) Currency Unit = Yugoslavian New Dinar 1 New Dinar = US$0.01748 US$1 = 56.2034 New Dinar FISCAL YEAR July 1 -- June 30 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AADT Annual Average Daily Traffic CAS Country Assistance Strategy EA Environment Appraisal EAR European Agency for Reconstruction EBRD European Bank for Reconstruction and Development EC European Commission EIB European Investment Bank EMP Environmental Management Plan EIRR Economic Intemal Rate of Retum ERTP Economic Recovery and Transitional Program FSU Former Soviet Union HDM Highway Design and Management Model ICB International Competitive Bidding IDA International Development Association IF1 International Financing Institution MFRS Ministry ofFinance of the Republic of Serbia MOCI Ministry of Capital Investments NPV Net Present Value OHR Office ofthe High Representative PIP Project Implementation Plan PIU Project Implementation Unit SIDA Swedish International Development Agency SNRA Swedish National Road Administration SRD Republic of Serbia Road Directorate TSS Transitional Support Strategy Vice President: Shigeo Katsu, ECAVP Country ManagerDirector: Rory O'SullivadOrsalia Kalantzopoulos, ECCU4 Sector Managermirector: Motoo KonishikIossein Razavi, ECSIE Task Team Leader/Task Manager: Cesar Queiroz, ECSIE FOR OFFICIAL, USE ONLY SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO TRANSPORT REHABILITATION PROJECT CONTENTS A.
    [Show full text]
  • TEM and TER Master Plan Backbone Networks Identified in 2005
    ECE ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE TEM and TER revised Master Plan - TEM and TER revised Final Report - Volume II: Annexes Final Report - Volume Master Plan Final Report Volume II: Annexes Trans-European Motorway (TEM) Trans-European Railway (TER) Projects United Nations 2011 Printed by the Publishing Service, United Nations, Geneva — GE.12.20691 — February 2012 — ECE/TRANS/183/Rev.2 (Vol. II) ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE Trans-European Motorway (TEM) project Trans-European Railway (TER) project TEM and TER revised Master Plan Final report Volume II : Annexes UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2011 1 UNECE TEM AND TER PROJECTS’ MASTER PLAN – 2011 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Volume was produced as a companion to the TEM and TER revised Master Plan final report. The International Road Union (IRU) provided a grant to the TEM Master Plan revision project for one part of this Volume, and this contribution was greatly appreciated. The authors of the annexes deserve a special mention: Annex III — Professor Dimitrios Tsamboulas, National Technical University of Athens, Greece; Annex IV — Professor András Timar, University of Pecs, Hungary; Annex V — Professor Gerd Sammer, Institute for Transport Studies, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria; Annex VI — Professor Enes Covrk, IPSA Institute, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina. The work of Mr. Peter Pospisil in the preparation of Annexes I, II, VII and VIII, based on inputs provided by all the TEM and TER National Coordinators, was also very much appreciated. ECE/TRANS/183/Rev.2 (Vol. II) 2 ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................. 11 ANNEX I TEM Master Plan revision questionnaires — Summary of national road forecasts ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]