DOCSLIB.ORG

TEM and TER Master Plan Backbone Networks Identified in 2005

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TEM and TER Master Plan Backbone Networks Identified in 2005 ECE ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE TEM and TER revised Master Plan - TEM and TER revised Final Report - Volume II: Annexes Final Report - Volume Master Plan Final Report Volume II: Annexes Trans-European Motorway (TEM) Trans-European Railway (TER) Projects United Nations 2011 Printed by the Publishing Service, United Nations, Geneva — GE.12.20691 — February 2012 — ECE/TRANS/183/Rev.2 (Vol. II) ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE Trans-European Motorway (TEM) project Trans-European Railway (TER) project TEM and TER revised Master Plan Final report Volume II : Annexes UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2011 1 UNECE TEM AND TER PROJECTS’ MASTER PLAN – 2011 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Volume was produced as a companion to the TEM and TER revised Master Plan final report. The International Road Union (IRU) provided a grant to the TEM Master Plan revision project for one part of this Volume, and this contribution was greatly appreciated. The authors of the annexes deserve a special mention: Annex III — Professor Dimitrios Tsamboulas, National Technical University of Athens, Greece; Annex IV — Professor András Timar, University of Pecs, Hungary; Annex V — Professor Gerd Sammer, Institute for Transport Studies, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria; Annex VI — Professor Enes Covrk, IPSA Institute, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina. The work of Mr. Peter Pospisil in the preparation of Annexes I, II, VII and VIII, based on inputs provided by all the TEM and TER National Coordinators, was also very much appreciated. ECE/TRANS/183/Rev.2 (Vol. II) 2 ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................. 11 ANNEX I TEM Master Plan revision questionnaires — Summary of national road forecasts ................................................................................................ 17 ANNEX II TER Master Plan revision questionnaires — Summary of national rail forecasts .................................................................................................. 28 ANNEX III How to ensure financing for road projects in the Master Plan ...... 40 1. UPDATING THE MASTER PLAN FIGURES ....................................................... 42 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 42 1.2 Data collection process ............................................................................... 42 2. METHODOLOGY USED IN THE ORIGINAL TEM MASTER PLAN FOR IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF PROJECTS .......................................... 45 2.1 Overview of the methodology ..................................................................... 45 Phase A — Identification ............................................................................ 45 Phase B — Analysis ................................................................................... 46 Phase C — Time period classification ........................................................... 46 2.2 Phases of the methodology ......................................................................... 46 2.2.1 Phase A — Identification ............................................................................ 46 2.2.2 Phase B — Analysis ................................................................................... 46 2.2.3 Phase C — Time period classification ........................................................... 49 3. REVISED FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS ................................................. 50 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 50 3.2 Results per country ..................................................................................... 50 3.3 Total analysis results ................................................................................... 53 4. ANALYSIS OF UNIT CONSTRUCTION COSTS OF THE PROJECTS FOR WHICH FINANCING HAS NOT YET BEEN ASSURED” TO THE TITLE .......................... 55 4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 55 4.2 Bosnia and Herzegovina ............................................................................ 55 4.3 Bulgaria ................................................................................................... 55 4.4 Lithuania ................................................................................................... 56 4.5 Poland ..................................................................................................... 57 4.6 Romania ................................................................................................... 57 4.7 Serbia ...................................................................................................... 58 4.8 Slovenia ................................................................................................... 59 4.9 Turkey ...................................................................................................... 59 5. ANALYSIS WITH RESPECT TO GDP ............................................................... 60 5.1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 60 5.2 Austria ..................................................................................................... 60 3 UNECE TEM AND TER PROJECTS’ MASTER PLAN – 2011 5.3 Belarus ..................................................................................................... 60 5.4 Bosnia and Herzegovina ............................................................................ 60 5.5 Bulgaria ................................................................................................... 61 5.6 Croatia..................................................................................................... 62 5.7 The Czech Republic ................................................................................... 62 5.8 The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia ................................................. 63 5.9 Georgia ................................................................................................... 63 5.10 Greece ..................................................................................................... 63 5.11 Hungary ................................................................................................... 63 5.12 Lithuania ................................................................................................... 64 5.13 The Republic of Moldova ............................................................................ 64 5.14 Poland ..................................................................................................... 64 5.15 Romania ................................................................................................... 65 5.16 The Russian Federation ............................................................................... 66 5.17 Serbia ...................................................................................................... 66 5.18 Slovakia ................................................................................................... 66 5.19 Slovenia ................................................................................................... 67 5.20 Turkey ...................................................................................................... 67 5.21 Ukraine .................................................................................................... 68 5.22 Conclusions .............................................................................................. 68 6. ANALYSIS OF PROJECTS ACCORDING TO SCORE/CLASS ............................ 69 6.1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 69 6.2 Austria ..................................................................................................... 69 6.3 Belarus ..................................................................................................... 69 6.4 Bosnia and Herzegovina ............................................................................ 69 6.5 Bulgaria .................................................................................................. 69 6.6 Croatia..................................................................................................... 69 6.7 The Czech Republic ................................................................................... 69 6.8 The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia ................................................. 69 6.9 Georgia ................................................................................................... 70 6.10 Greece ..................................................................................................... 70 6.11 Hungary ................................................................................................... 70 6.12 Lithuania ................................................................................................... 70 6.13 The Republic of Moldova ............................................................................ 70 6.14 Montenegro .............................................................................................. 70 6.15 Poland .................................................................................................... 70 6.16 Romania ..................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Information Current As of November 18, 2020
    Information Current as of November 18, 2020 Table of Contents SOURCEREE PERSPECTIVE ............................................................................................3 OVERVIEW .........................................................................................................................6 WEBSITES ...........................................................................................................................6 OWNERSHIP .......................................................................................................................6 OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................................................6 FINANCIAL INTENTIONS .................................................................................................7 THE EFFECT ON AMERICA .............................................................................................8 ECONOMIC CORRIDORS .................................................................................................9 FUNDING .......................................................................................................................... 11 APPENDIX A: PROGRAM LEADERSHIP ....................................................................... 16 APPENDIX B: ASSOCIATED ENTITIES ......................................................................... 18 APPENDIX C: PARTICIPATING NATIONS.................................................................... 21 APPENDIX D: PROJECTS ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Yüzey Araştırmalar Işığında Erzurum Pasinler İlçesinde Tespit Edilen Obsidyen Merkezleri Ve Atölyeleri
    MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi 2021 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 3 MANAS Journal of Social Studies 2021 Volume: 10 No: 3 ISSN: 1694-7215 Research Paper / Araştırma Makalesi Yüzey Araştırmalar Işığında Erzurum Pasinler İlçesinde Tespit Edilen Obsidyen Merkezleri ve Atölyeleri Alpaslan CEYLAN1 ve Seval AKÇELİK2 Öz Kuzeydoğu Anadolu Bölgesi, jeolojik yapısı nedeniyle önemli obsidyen yataklarına ev sahipliği yapmaktadır. Ana hatlarıyla Erzurum-Kars Platosu’nda bulunan volkanik sahalar, bölgenin temel obsidyen kaynaklarını oluşturmaktadır. Erzurum’un batısında yer alan Söğütlü’nün kuzeyindeki tepelik alanlar, Palandöken Dağı’nın güneybatısı, Pasinler ve çevresi obsidyen yataklarının tespit edildiği önemli arazilerdir. Pasinler ilçesi jeolojik karakterini, Pliosen sonu ve Pleistosen içinde meydana gelen tektonik hareketler sonucunda kazanmıştır. İlçe ve yakın çevresinde andezit, bazalt ve obsidyen gibi dış püskürük kayaçlar geniş bir yayılım göstermektedir. Bölgede 1998 yılında başladığımız yüzey araştırmalarında çalışma sahalarımızdan biri de Pasinler olmuştur. Pasinlerde yaptığımız çalışmalarda çok sayıda keramik ve obsidyen tespit edilmiştir. Gelişmiş obsidyen analiz yöntemlerine rağmen çalışma alanımızda bulunan merkezlerin sadece birkaçından alınan örneklerin analizleri yapılmıştır. İlçe ve yakın çevresinde Kotandüzü, Pelitli ve Tımar gibi önemli obsidyen merkezlerinin yanı sıra Cin Kalesi, Çalıyazı Kalesi, Kavuşturan Kalesi ve Sos Höyük’te yapılan araştırmalarda bu merkezlerin de önemli birer obsidyen atölyesi olabileceği düşünülmektedir. Ayrıca
    [Show full text]
  • Doğu Anadolu Yiğişim Karmaşiği (Tortum-Narman-Oltu-Pasinler- Horasan-Erzurum Kd Türkiye ) Kuzey Kesimi Metalojenik Kuşak Mi Dir ?
    DOĞU ANADOLU YIĞIŞIM KARMAŞIĞI (TORTUM-NARMAN-OLTU-PASİNLER- HORASAN-ERZURUM KD TÜRKİYE ) KUZEY KESİMİ METALOJENİK KUŞAK MI DIR ? İsmet Cengiz1, Mehmet Aslan2, Serkan Özkümüş3 ve Neşat Konak4 1 Demir Export A.Ş., Ankara, Türkiye, 2 MTA Orta Anadolu IV. Bölge Müdürlüğü, Malatya, Türkiye, 3 MTA Genel Müdürlüğü, Maden Etüt ve Arama Dairesi, 06800, Ankara, Türkiye, 4 MTA Genel Müdürlüğü, Jeoloji Etütleri Dairesi, 06800, Ankara, Türkiye. İnceleme alanı, Erzurum kuzeyinde, Tortum-Narman-Oltu-Şenkaya-Pasinler ve Horasan ilçeleri arasında yer almakta olup “Doğu Anadolu Yığışım Karmaşığı” olarak tanımlanan bölgenin kuzey kenarını oluşturmaktadır. Yığışım karmaşığının en yaşlı kaya birimleri temeli oluşturan Erzurum Kars Ofiyolit Zonuna ait ofiyolitik kayaçlardır. Tipik bir yığışım pirizması özelliğinde ve melanj karekteri sunan bu birim üzerine, Eosenden Pliyo-Kuvaternere kadar devam eden volkano sedimanter bir istif gelmektedir. MTA tarafından son yıllarda bu bölgede yapılan çalışmalarda farklı tip alterasyon ve cevherleşmeler tespit edilmiştir. Ofiyolitik kayaçlarda krom cevherleşmelerinin yanında Kıbrıs Tip Masif Sülfit ile Lisvenitlere bağlı epitermal sistemde gelişmiş civa ve altın; Tersiyer havzada ise damar tip Cu-Pb-Zn ve epitermal As-Au cevherleşmeleri izlenir. Belirli bir dizilim ve farklı litolojiler içinde yer alan bu alterasyon ve cevherleşmeler, Doğu Anadolu Yığışım Karmaşığı olarak adlandırılan bölgenin kuzey kesimini önemli bir metalojenik kuşak haline getirmektedir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Metalojenik Kuşak, Erzurum Kars Ofiyolit Zonu, Doğu Anadolu Yığışım. IS THE NORTHERN SECTION OF THE EASTERN ANATOLIAN ACCERETIONARY PRISM (TORTUM-NARMAN-OLTU-PASİNLER- HORASAN-ERZURUM NE TURKEY ) A METALLOGENIC BELT ? İsmet Cengiz1, Mehmet Aslan2, Serkan Özkümüş3 and Neşat Konak4 1 Demir Export A.Ş., Ankara, Turkey, 2 MTA Orta Anadolu IV. Bölge Müdürlüğü, Malatya, Turkey, 3 MTA Genel Müdürlüğü, Maden Etüt ve Arama Dairesi, 06800, Ankara, Turkey, 4 MTA Genel Müdürlüğü, Jeoloji Etütleri Dairesi, 06800, Ankara, Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia 2029 Prospectus
    REPUBLIC OF SERBIA (represented by the Government of the Republic of Serbia, acting by and through the Ministry of Finance) €1,000,000,000 1.500 per cent. Notes due 2029 Issue price: 98.909 per cent. The €1,000,000,000 1.500 per cent. Notes due 2029 (the “Notes”) to be issued by the Republic of Serbia, represented by the Government of the Republic of Serbia acting by and through the Ministry of Finance (the “Issuer”) will mature on 26 June 2029 and, unless previously purchased and cancelled, will be redeemed at their principal amount on that date. The Notes will bear interest at a rate of 1.500 per cent. per annum. Interest will accrue on the outstanding principal amount of the Notes from and including 26 June 2019 and will be payable annually in arrear on 26 June in each year, commencing on 26 June 2020. All payments of principal and interest in respect of the Notes shall be made free and clear of, and without withholding or deduction for, any taxes, duties, assessments or governmental charges of whatever nature imposed, levied, collected, withheld or assessed by or within the Republic of Serbia (the “Republic of Serbia” or “Serbia”) or any political subdivision or any authority thereof or therein having power to tax, unless such withholding or deduction is required by law. In that event, the Issuer shall pay such additional amounts as will result in the receipt by the Noteholders of such amounts as would have been received by them if no such withholding or deduction had been required, subject to certain exceptions set out in the Conditions (as defined below).
    [Show full text]
  • ROADS of SERBIA” ZORAN DROBNJAK “When You Want to Develop an Area, Equip It with Good Roads”, Prof
    INTRODUCTION ACTING DIRECTOR OF THE PE “ROADS OF SERBIA” ZORAN DROBNJAK “When you want to develop an area, equip it with good roads”, prof. dr Milan Vujanić says and I entirely agree with this. Interdependence of industry and roads is quite evident because roads, in addition to their main function concerning the transport of people and goods, also generate growth and development of all places through which the road network passes as well as all other which are indirectly connected with motorways and other important routes in the Republic of Serbia. Thus it is the main dedication of the PE “Roads of Serbia” to achieve what is expected from us – to successfully finish all investments and provide the same level of quality of all the roads in Serbia with constant increase of the level of traffic safety, with cordial assistance of the Government of the Republic of Serbia and the Ministry of Construction, Transport and Infrastructure. This is an imperative of our work, not only because of the expectations in front of us regarding the accession to the European Union, but also because good roads are one of the pillars of every serious and modern country. Road towards the achievement of big results starts with the devotion of individuals, each one of us. Owing to an exceptional devotion of the employees in the PE “Roads of Serbia”, achievement of the adopted plans is possible, regardless of the difficulties and not always favourable work conditions which the time sets upon us. Daily perseverance, devotion and openness of our employees to new knowledge and changes is obvious.
    [Show full text]
  • China's Economic Footprint in the Western Balkans
    Jacob Mardell ASIA POLICY BRIEF China's Economic Footprint in the Western Balkans Geopolitics has returned to vogue, and the EU does not enjoy a monopoly on inuence in the Western Balkans. China is the latest player on the scene, and although its economic footprint is still relatively small, Beijing’s growing presence is a new reality that Brussels needs to contend with. China’s “no-strings attached” nancing of infrastructure potentially undermines the EU’s reform-orientated approach. Relevance Bertelsmann Stiftung Focus Bertelsmann Stiftung Forecast Bertelsmann Stiftung Information Bertelsmann Stiftung Options Bertelsmann Stiftung About the author Jacob Mardell is a freelance researcher and journalist who has recently travelled Eurasia exploring China’s Belt and Road Initiative. He is writing a series of articles, "On the New Silk Road,". Since March, he has traveled overland from the UK to Beijing. Over the next ve months he will be travelling in Southeast Asia, returning to Europe over sea, via Djibouti and Ethiopia. Beijing’s approach China’s economic presence in the Western Balkans Six (WB6) countries of Albania, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Kosovo, Montenegro, North Macedonia, and Serbia is framed in terms of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), a foreign policy slogan and development concept announced by Xi Jinping in 2013. Although China maintained active diplomatic relations with Yugoslavia during the 1980s and 1990s and vocally opposed the NATO bombing of Serbia and Montenegro in the late 1990s, economic outreach in the countries of former Yugoslavia only truly began (with Serbia) in the second decade of the 21st Century. Beijing’s relationship with Albania – not part of former Yugoslavia – was very close until the Sino-Albanian split of the 1970s, but this historical curiosity has little bearing on contemporary Sino-Albanian relations.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020​ Yılı Perfo​Rmans Programı
    2020 YILI PERFORMANS PROGRAMI OCAK-2020 Strateji Geliştirme Dairesi Başkanlığı BAKAN SUNUŞU Ekonomik kalkınmanın temel etkenlerinden biri olarak, toplum refahının artırılmasına önemli katkılar sağlayan ulaşım sektöründe hedefimiz, başta mega projeler olmak üzere, ülkemizde devam eden yatırımları hızla tamamlayıp hizmete sunmak ve dev yatırımlarla ülkemizi daha da ileriye götürmektir. Bu kapsamda, ülkemizin rekabet gücüne ve milletimizin yaşam kalitesinin yükseltilmesine katkı veren; güvenli, erişilebilir, ekonomik, konforlu, hızlı, çevreye duyarlı, kesintisiz, dengeli, çağdaş hizmetlerin sunulduğu, sürdürülebilir bir ulaştırma sistemi oluşturmak için çalışmalarımız hızla devam etmektedir. Karayolu sektöründe, mevcut ağın trafik güvenliğini artıracak, taşıt işletme maliyetini düşürecek, ülkenin her köşesine her mevsim hizmet götürülmesine imkan sağlayacak geometrik ve fiziki iyileştirmelerin yapılması hususunda gerek sektörel düzenlemeler gerekse altyapı yatırımları ile büyük yol katedilmiş olup, bu doğrultuda kamu imkânlarının yanısıra, kamu- özel sektör işbirliği ile gerçekleştirilen projeler de aşamalı olarak uygulamaya konulmaktadır. Gerçekleştireceğimiz temel hizmet ve politikaları hayata geçirmek, belirlenen vizyona ulaşabilmek için stratejik planda yer alan amaçlar ve hedefler doğrultusunda Karayolları Genel Müdürlüğünün öncelikleri tespit edilerek 2020 Yılı Performans Programı oluşturulmuştur. Belirlenen politika ve öncelikler doğrultusunda Stratejik Plan ve bütçe ilişkisini gerçekleştiren, ayrılan bütçe kaynaklarının etkili, ekonomik
    [Show full text]
  • ERZURUM HORASAN İLÇESİ KERAMİKLERİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ Review of the Keramics in Erzurum District of Horasan Özlem ALKAN Arş
    KAFDAĞI Cilt:2, Sayı:2, Aralık 2017,74-96 Gönderim Tarihi: 07.06.2017 Kabul Tarihi: 15.09. 2017 ERZURUM HORASAN İLÇESİ KERAMİKLERİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ Review of the keramics in Erzurum district of Horasan Özlem ALKAN Arş. Gör. Ardahan Üniversitesi, İnsani Bilimler ve Edebiyat Fakültesi - Tarih Bölümü Eski Çağ Tarihi Anabilim Dalı Çalışmanın Türü: Araştırma ÖZ Horasan, tarih boyunca birçok önemli yolun kavşak noktası olan Erzurum ili sınırları içerisinde yer alır. Bu sebeple de Horasan mevkii, “Geçit Ülkesi” olarak tarihi kaynaklarda geçmektedir. Eskiçağlardan itibaren, insanoğlu tarafından yerleşim yeri olarak tercih edilen Horasan bölgesi, birçok medeniyetin de izlerini taşımaktadır. Hurriler, Hayaşa-Azzi, Daia(e)ni/Diau(e)hi ve Urartulular gibi topluluklar ilçenin tarihi seyrinde önemlidir. Bu araştırmada, Doğu Anadolu Bölgesi’nde 1998 yılından itibaren, A. Ceylan başkanlığında, benim de üyesi olduğum ekip tarafından yapılan yüzey araştırmalarında tespit edilen Horasan keramikleri incelenmiştir. Araştırma sahamızda tespit edilen keramik verisi genellikle Geç Kalkolitik, İlk Tunç, Erken Demir, Orta Demir Çağ ve az miktarda da Orta Çağ’a aittir. Özellikle Urartu Devleti’nin yaşadığı Orta Demir dönemine ait buluntular öne çıkmaktadır. Bölgede bulunan Aliçeyrek Kalesi ve Kaya Mezarı, Hasanbey Nekropolü, Hasanbey Kutsal Kaya İşaretleri, Urartu yol ağı üzerinde tespit edilen Kaynarca Yerleşmesi ve Urartu su politikasının bir örneği olan Yıldıran Göleti bu durumu kanıtlar niteliktedirler. Anahtar Kelimeler: Erzurum, Horasan, Keramik, Urartu. Abstract Horasan is located within the boundaries of Erzurum, which is the intersection of many important roads throughout history. For this reason, Horasan locates ‘‘Gate Country’’ in historical sources. Horasan region, adopted as a settlement by humankind dating back to the ancient times, bears traces of many civilizations as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Corridor 10 – Better Links Between the Region and Europe
    Corridor 10 – Better Links Between the Region and Europe Dr Dušan Mladenović Association of Transport and Telecommunications Tradition Valleys of the Rivers Danube, Sava and Morava, have been some of the most important transportation corridors in the South East Europe for more than 2,000 years. Pan-European Corridors in the Balkans Corridor 10 With Its Branches крацима It runs from Austria to Greece. It includes both the railway corridor, 2,528 km long, and the road corridor, 2,300 km long. Salzburg (A) – Ljubljana (SLO) – Zagreb (HR) – Belgrade (SRB) – Niš (SRB) – Skopje (MK) – Veles (MK) – Thessaloniki (GR). * Branch A: Graz (A) - Maribor (SLO) – Zagreb (HR) * Branch B: Budapest(SRB) – Novi Sad (SRB) - Belgrade (SRB) * Branch C: Nis (SRB) – Dimitrovgrad (SRB) – Sofia (BG) - Istanbul (TR) – via corridor 4 * Branch D: Veles (MK) – Prilep (MK) - Bitola (MK) - Florina (GR) - Igoumenitsa (GR) Priority Projects of the EU Road Network 2005 New Reality 1. EU has defined its priority axes that run parallel with Corridor 10 in Serbia. The neighbouring countries construct speedily the infrastructure network in the close vicinity. 2. Road transit transport on Corridor 10 has stagnated, and an increasing trend is recorded only on the directions east-west and northeast-southwest. Network Traffic Load and Regional Traffic Flows The largest traffic load is on the passage through Belgrade, which is why construction of Belgrade Bypass is one of the priorities. Regional traffic flows through Serbia include both transit flows and Serbia’s bilateral exchange; they are most expressed on the east-west direction. Izvor: JP Putevi Srbije Freight Traffic Intensity on the Serbian Borders AADT (Trucks per day) Source: JP Putevi Srbije Traffic Volume on Corridor 10 and Number of TIR Transits Goods Vehicles 600000 500000 400000 300000 200000 100000 ec.
    [Show full text]
  • 2400 New Locality Record of the Red-Bellied Lizard, Darevskia Parvula
    Biyoloji / Biology DOI: 10.21597/jist.732691 Araştırma Makalesi / Research Article Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10(4): 2400-2405, 2020 Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 10(4): 2400-2405, 2020 ISSN: 2146-0574, eISSN: 2536-4618 New Locality Record of the Red-Bellied Lizard, Darevskia parvula (Lantz & Cyrén, 1913) s.l., from eastern Anatolia, Turkey Kamil CANDAN1,*, Serkan GÜL2, Yusuf KUMLUTAŞ1,3, Elif YILDIRIM CAYNAK1,3, Çetin ILGAZ1,3 ABSTRACT: Darevskia parvula is a rock lizard that is endemic for Anatolia. The known distribution range of the species is limited on eastern and northeastern Anatolia. Although many morphological studies have been carried out on the species, there are also molecular studies to construct its taxonomy in recent years. Four adult lizard specimens were collected from eastern Anatolia in 2016 during a herpetological field survey. We present a summary of a morphological features, and report new locality which is the westernmost record (Çayırlı Village, Erzincan) for D. parvula sensu lato in Turkey. Our finding largely extends the known distribution of the species. Key Words: Darevskia parvula, biodiversity, morphology, distribution, turkey 1 Kamil CANDAN (Orcid ID: 0000-0002-6934-3971), Yusuf KUMLUTAŞ (Orcid ID: 0000-0003-1154-6757), Elif YILDIRIM CAYNAK (Orcid ID: 0000-0001-9614-5754), Çetin ILGAZ (Orcid ID: 0000-0001-7862-9106), Dokuz Eylül University, Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, Buca-İzmir, Turkey. 2 Serkan GÜL (Orcid ID: 0000-0002-0372-7462), Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Faculty of Science and Arts, Department of Biology, Rize, Turkey. 3 Yusuf KUMLUTAŞ (Orcid ID: 0000-0003-1154-6757), Elif YILDIRIM CAYNAK (Orcid ID: 0000-0001-9614-5754), Çetin ILGAZ (Orcid ID: 0000-0001-7862-9106), Dokuz Eylül University, Research and Application Center for Fauna Flora, Buca-İzmir, Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • Doğu Anadolu Yüksek Platosu'nun Manto Destekli Asimetrik Dom
    TÜCAUM 30. Yıl Uluslararası Coğrafya Sempozyumu International Geography Symposium on the 30th Anniversary of TUCAUM 3-6 Ekim 2018 /3-6 October 2018, Ankara Doğu Anadolu Yüksek Platosu’nun Manto Destekli Asimetrik Dom Yapısının Jeomorfolojik Analizi The geomorphic patterns of a mantle supported asymmetrical dome structure of the East Anatolian High Plateau Erkan Yılmaz*1, C. Erdem Bekaroğlu1, Şule Gürboğa2 1Ankara Üniversitesi, Coğrafya Bölümü 2Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü Öz: Doğu Anadolu yüksek platosu deniz seviyesinden ortalama 2 kilometrelik yüksekliği, yaygın volkanik arazileri ve sıkışma tektoniğinin ürünü olan K-G yönünde kısalmış ve kalınlaşmış kabuk yapısıyla çarpıcı bir morfolojiye sahiptir. Bununla birlikte güncel jeofizik çalışmalar, yüksek platonun beklenenden yaklaşık 10 km daha ince bir kabuk kalınlığına (~45 km) sahip olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Yeni jeolojik yorumlarla birleştirildiğinde, bu durum bölgede manto litosferinin olmadığını, kabuğun doğrudan sıcak manto tarafından desteklendiğini göstermektedir. Bu çalışmada, manto destekli Doğu Anadolu domunun kendisini morfolojik olarak yeryüzüne nasıl yansıttığını anlamak amacıyla bölgedeki havzalar iki morfolojik indisle analiz edilmiştir. Bunlardan ilki olan drenaj havzası asimetri faktörü (AF), bölgeyi kesen 39° K ve 40° K paralellerinin güneyindeki havzaların (Bingöl, Arıcak and Lice-Kulp vd.) sistematik olarak yüksek AF değerlerine sahip olduğunu ve güneye doğru çarpıldığını; aynı hattın kuzeyindeki havzaların ise (Kelkit, Tekman, Horasan, Kağızman-Tuzluca,
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey in the Caspian Sea Region
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2008 Turkey In The Caspian Sea Region Seyma Akkoyunlu University of Central Florida Part of the Political Science Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Akkoyunlu, Seyma, "Turkey In The Caspian Sea Region" (2008). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 3734. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/3734 TURKEY IN THE CASPIAN SEA REGION by SEYMA AKKOYUNLU B.S. Istanbul University, 2005 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of the Masters of Arts in the Department of Political Science in the College of Sciences at the University of Central Florida Orlando, FL Spring Term 2008 Major Professor: Houman Sadri ©2008 Seyma Akkoyunlu ii ABSTRACT This thesis will determine the influence of Turkey’s domestic resources on Turkey’s foreign relations with the five Turkic states in the Caspian Sea Region. The spheres analyzed in this study are the common ties, which are history, culture, religion and language, with the regional countries, pan-Turkism, Turkey’s initial interactions as well as ongoing constructive policies in the region. Findings showed that both Turkey and the five Turkic republics were enthusiastic to carry their relations in every field to future cooperation following the break up of the Soviet Union.
    [Show full text]