DOCSLIB.ORG

Mortem Et Gloriam Army Lists Use the Army Lists to Create Your Own Customised Armies Using the Mortem Et Gloriam Army Builder

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mortem Et Gloriam Army Lists Use the Army Lists to Create Your Own Customised Armies Using the Mortem Et Gloriam Army Builder Army Lists GREECE AND MACEDON Contents Classical Greek 670 to 275 BCE Thracian Hill Tribes 670 BCE to 25 CE Spartan v03 668 to 394 BCE Early Macedonian 500 to 357 BCE Illyrian 500 BCE to 20 CE Mercenary Greek 401 to 298 BCE Later Spartan 393 to 228 BCE Alexandrian Macedonian 356 to 323 BCE Alexandrian Expeditionary 334 to 324 BCE Macedonian Successor 323 to 280 BCE Thraco-Macedonian 323 to 281 BCE Coalition against Antigonus 302 to 301 BCE Pyrrhic 294 to 272 BCE Later Macedonian 279 to 168 BCE Hellenistic Greek 275 to 146 BCE Hellenistic Spartan 227 to 195 BCE Version 2020.03: 2nd May 2020 © Simon Hall Creating an army with the Mortem et Gloriam Army Lists Use the army lists to create your own customised armies using the Mortem et Gloriam Army Builder. There are few general rules to follow: 1. An army must have at least 2 generals and can have no more than 4. 2. You must take at least the minimum of any troops noted and may not go beyond the maximum of any. 3. No army may have more than two generals who are Talented or better. 4. Unless specified otherwise, all elements in a UG must be classified identically. Unless specified otherwise, if an optional characteristic is taken, it must be taken by all the elements in the UG for which that optional characteristic is available. 5. Any UGs can be downgraded by one quality grade and/or by one shooting skill representing less strong, tired or understrength troops. If any bases are downgraded all in the UG must be downgraded. So Average-Experienced skirmishers can always be downgraded to Poor-Unskilled. Where allies are allowed, they must conform to the following rules: 1. They must be a minimum of 2 and a maximum of 4 UGs. 2. They must take enough UGs to get them to at least 50% of the minimums in the list being used. 3. They can thereafter take any troops up to the maximum to create the rest of the allied contingent. 4. Unless specified in the notes, the general must be the same type as the army commander in the main list but cannot be legendary. Usually this results in 1-3 UGs being compulsory and you having full flexibility on the rest. Where an internal ally is allowed, and no contingent is specified they must conform to the following rules: 1. They must be a minimum of 2 and a maximum of 4 UGs. 2. The total number of troops taken of each type in the entire army must not exceed the maxima for that troop type. 3. They must take enough UGs to get them to at least 50% of the minimums in the list if there is enough allowance for a UG after the core army itself has taken the minimum. For example: An army has 4-12 cavalry (UG size 4,6) and 18-32 spearmen (UG size 6,8,9) as compulsory troops with 2 internal allies. The core army must take 4 cavalry and at least 18 spearmen. The first ally must take 4 cavalry and at least 9 spearmen. The second ally must take 4 cavalry but cannot take the 9 spearmen as this would exceed the 32 spearmen limit for the army. 4. They can thereafter take any troops up to the maximum to create the rest of the allied contingent. Usually this results in 1-3 UGs being compulsory and you having full flexibility on the rest. As a courtesy to your opponent, when you deploy your troops you should describe it fully; type, training, quality, protection, melee weaponry, shooting skill and weaponry, characteristics and which ally if appropriate. You should also explain how any unusual troop types in your army function and any special rules including Stakes, Caltrops, Barricades and Obstacles and troop types such as Battle Wagons. Version 2020.03: 2nd May 2020 © Simon Hall Historical Introduction In the 8th century BCE, Greece began to emerge from the Dark Ages which followed the fall of the Mycenaean civilization. Rapidly increasing population in the 8th and 7th centuries resulted in emigration of many Greeks to form colonies across the Mediterranean. In Sparta, the Messenian Wars resulted in the conquest of Messenia and enserfment of the Messenians. The subjugated population, farmed and laboured for Sparta, whilst every Spartan male citizen became a soldier of the Spartan Army in a permanently militarized state. By the 6th century BCE four cities had emerged as dominant in Greek affairs: Athens, Sparta, Corinth, and Thebes. The intervention of Sparta in 510 BCE in the affairs of Athens led to a revolution and Athens became a “democracy”. Around 540 BCE the Persians conquered the Greek cities of Ionia in Asia Minor. In 499 BCE the Greek cities revolted against the rule of Darius I. The cities received help from Athens and Eretria. After supressing the revolt in 493 BCE. Darius decided to conquer the whole of Greece. Thrace and Macedonia were conquered and an expedition sent against Athens. This expedition was defeated at the battle of Marathon in 490 BCE. Ten years later Xerxes I, son and successor of Darius attempted a second invasion. Leonidas with 300 Spartans and various allies attempted to hold the pass at Thermopylae which was bypassed. The Spartans were surrounded and died fighting to the last man. The Persians were able to march unimpeded through Boeotia and Attica, but the Persian navy was defeated at Salamis. The following year the Greeks defeated the Persians at Plataea and the Persian threat was eliminated. The following 50 years saw the dominance of Athens and the creation of the Athenian Empire. The dominant position of Athens was a threat to Sparta and led to the Peloponnesian War. This lasted from 431 to 404 BCE. A disastrous expedition to Syracuse (415 to 413 BCE) weakened the Athenian position and in 404 BCE they sued for peace. Sparta dominated Greek affairs for the next thirty years until they were defeated by the Thebans at the battle of Leuctra in 371 BCE. A further battle at Mantinea in 362 BCE was won by the Thebans but their leader, Epaminondas, was killed. The Greeks remained divided for the next thirty years. Power was now to shift to the northern kingdom of Macedon. In 359 BCE Philip II came to the throne and set about reforming the army. He conquered the surrounding territories. In 338 BCE he defeated an alliance of Thebans and Athenians at the battle of Chaeronea. His son, Alexander, played a prominent part in the battle. Philip planned to lead an invasion against the Persians. He was however assassinated in 336 BCE and was succeeded by Alexander. Alexander defeated the Persians in three major battles, conquered the Persian Empire and reached as far as India. Alexander died in 323 BCE at the age of 32. Version 2020.03: 2nd May 2020 © Simon Hall Almost immediately the Greeks attempted to throw off Macedonian rule, but were defeated in the Lamian War. Alexander’s generals fought for control of his Empire. In the next forty years a series of wars were fought on Greek and Macedonian territory. In 281 BCE Celtic tribes, invaded Macedonia, killed the current king Ptolemy Ceraunus and devastated Macedonia, Thrace and northern Greece. Some were invited by the king of Bithynia to Asia Minor where they established a kingdom in Phrygia which was subsequently known as Galatia. Antigonus Gonatus, grandson of one of Alexander’s generals, defeated a group of Celts that had remained in Europe and seized the throne of Macedon. Hiring more Galatians as mercenaries he established stability. His successors ruled Macedon until 168 BCE. Antigonus also controlled Corinth and Chalcis and was thus able to influence affairs in Greece. Greek affairs became dominated by the Aetolian and Achaean leagues. In 235 BCE a Spartan king, Cleomenes III, came to the throne of Sparta. He reformed the Spartan state which had been short of manpower ever since Leuctra. From 229 BCE he fought a war against the Achaean League until he was defeated by an allied army of Macedon and the Achaean League at Sellasia in 222 BCE. The end of the Second Punic War saw the Romans turn their attention to Greece. During the Second Punic War, Philip V of Macedon had offered an alliance to the Carthaginians. Invited by the Aetolian League, the Romans declared war on Macedon and defeated Philip at the battle of Cynoscephelae in 197 BCE. A further war against Macedonia resulted in the Macedonian defeat at Pydna in 168 BCE. Roman rule of Greece and Macedon was established permanently after the sack of Corinth in 146 BCE. Carthage was sacked in the same year. Greece and Macedonia remained under Roman rule for the next six centuries until the collapse of the Western Roman empire. Troop Notes At the start of our period the dominant troop type in Greece was the hoplite. The hoplite was equipped with helmet, a large round shield, metal or linen body armour, greaves and a long spear 8 foot in length. Formed in a rigid formation typically 8 ranks deep known as a phalanx they dominated Greek warfare. Hoplites were supported by peltasts, javelinmen carrying a pelta shield and psiloi, equipped with bows and slings. During the Peloponnesian War, larger numbers of troops were required. Not all troops could afford full hoplite panoply so hoplite equipment generally became lighter. The role of the peltast became more important. In the 4th century BCE Iphicrates introduced reforms, doubling the length of the spear and replacing the hoplon shield with a smaller pelte shield.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MAC II in General, All Greek Troops “Constitutionally
    ALEXANDER’S FINAL ARMY An Honors Thesis for the Department of History By Jonathan A. Miller Thesis Advisor: Steven Hirsch Tufts University, 2011 AKNOWLEDGMENTS Alexander the Great is a man with whom many great leaders throughout history have been compared, a model of excellence whose achievements can never quite be matched. 2 My introduction to his legacy occurred in the third grade. Reading a biography of Julius Caesar for a class project, I happened across Plutarch’s famous description of Caesar’s reaction to reading a history of Alexander: “he was lost in thought for a long time, and then burst into tears. His friends were astonished, and asked the reason for his tears. ‘Do you not think,’ said he, ‘that it is a matter of sorrow that while Alexander, at my age, was already king of so many peoples, I have as yet achieved no brilliant success?’”1 This story captivated my imagination and stuck with me throughout my middle and high school years. Once at college, I decided to write a thesis on Alexander to better understand the one man capable of breeding thoughts of inadequacy in Caesar. This work is in many ways a tribute to both Caesar and Alexander. More pointedly, it is an exploration into the designs of a man at the feet of whom lay the whole world. This paper has meant a lot to me. I want to thank all those who made it possible. First and foremost, my undying gratitude goes to Professor Steven Hirsch, who has helped me navigate the difficult process of researching and writing this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Deluxe Alex-4
    THE Table of Contents MACEDONIAN Rules Section Page ART OF WAR 1.0 Introduction ......................... 2 338–326 B.C. 2.0 Game Components .............. 2 3.0 The Sequence of Play .......... 6 4.0 Leaders ................................ 6 5.0 Leader Activation/Orders .... 9 6.0 Movement ........................... 12 7.0 Combat Movement .............. 16 8.0 Combat ................................ 17 GAME DESIGN: 9.0 Special Units ....................... 22 10.0 The Effects of Combat ........ 27 MARK HERMAN Sources ........................................ 29 RICHARD BERG ©2003 Rodger B. MacGowan RULES BOOKLET (1.0) INTRODUCTION (2.0) GAME COMPONENTS The Great Battles of Alexander the Great is the first volume/game Each Game of Deluxe Battles of Alexander contains: in GMT’s Great Battles of History series. It portrays the development of the Macedonian Art of War, as originally formulated by Philip II, 3 22” x 34” mapsheets, backprinted King of Macedon. It reached its peak during the reign of his son, 3 Sets of counters (720 counters total) Alexander III, who, after his conquest of the Persian Empire, became 1 Rules Booklet known as Alexander the Great. 1 Scenario Booklet 2 Player Aid Cards This special, “Deluxe” edition covers almost every battle fought by 1 ten-sided die Alexander and his army before and during his conquest of the civilized A bunch of glassine envelopes world (Western version). The battles illustrate the triumph of the Macedonian system of “combined arms”—led by a powerful heavy If you have any questions about these rules, we’ll be glad to (try to) cavalry and anchored by a relentless phalanx of spears—first over a answer them, if you send them to us in a self-addressed, stamped Greek hoplite system that had been in place for centuries, and then to (regardless where you’re from) envelope, addressed to: its ultimate fruition against the massive, but often out-of-date, “light” armies of the Persian Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Dbm Army Lists
    D.B.M ARMY LISTS For use with the De Bellis Multitudinis Wargames Rules BOOK 2: 500 BC to 476 AD Compiled by Phil Barker and Richard Bodley Scott WARGAMES RESEARCH GROUP 2nd EDITION, NOV 1998 D.B.M. ARMY LISTS For use with the De Bellis Multitudinis Wargames Rules BOOK 2: 500 BC to 476 AD Compiled by Phil Barker and Richard Bodley Scott WARGAMES RESEARCH GROUP 2nd EDITION, Nov 1998 - All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permission in writing from the copyright holder. © Wargames Research Group, November 1998 The Keep, Le Marchant Barracks, London Road, Devizes, Wiltshire. SN10 2ER Printed in England D.B.M. ARMY LISTS BOOK 2 - THE CLASSICAL PERIOD, 500 BC TO 476 AD These lists are intended for use with our "De Bellis Multitudinis" wargames rules, more familiarly known as "DBM". While mainly intended for competition games, they also provide a general guide to armies' troop classification and proportions for use in conjunction with more detailed sources such as the W.R.G. army handbooks. Each list is designed to produce 300 AP to 500 AP armies which closely simulate their real life prototype, while still allowing sufficient flexibility to cover historical variations during the period and legitimate differences of opinion or personal preference. Most of them include about 200 AP of compulsory troops and allow greater freedom of choice for the remainder, this choice diminishing as the size of the army increases.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnic Constructions in the Seleucid Military by Del John Houle a Thesis Presented to the University of Waterloo in Fulfilment O
    Ethnic Constructions in the Seleucid Military by Del John Houle A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfilment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Arts in Classical Studies Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2015 © Del John Houle 2015 Author’s Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract This study examines the use and meaning of ethnic denominations in Hellenistic military contexts, both in literature and epigraphy. By analyzing the epigraphic records of the settlements which provided soldiers for Hellenistic (and particularly Seleucid) armies, the study shows that military units often operated under a single ethnic denomination (i.e. “Macedonian”) while including members from a variety of ethnic backgrounds, and thus that units’ use of ethnic terminology often represented a preservation of tradition rather than an indication of its members’ geographic or genealogical origin. iii Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to thank my principal sources of academic guidance and inspiration, Dr. Altay Coskun and Dr. Richard Wenghofer. Without their insight and guidance over the past years, this study would not have reached its present level. I also owe my thanks to Dr. Sheila Ager and Dr. Robert Porter for their time and patience in reviewing my work, and the exciting and extremely enjoyable conversations which followed. Of course, I do not have the space here to adequately express my thanks to all my friends and colleagues who have helped to guide and shape this study (and my studies in general) over the course of many conversations and conference exchanges.
    [Show full text]
  • Companion Cavalry and the Macedonian Heavy Infantry
    THE ARMY OP ALEXANDER THE GREAT %/ ROBERT LOCK IT'-'-i""*'?.} Submitted to satisfy the requirements for the degree of Ph.D. in the School of History in the University of Leeds. Supervisor: Professor E. Badian Date of Submission: Thursday 14 March 1974 IMAGING SERVICES NORTH X 5 Boston Spa, Wetherby </l *xj 1 West Yorkshire, LS23 7BQ. * $ www.bl.uk BEST COPY AVAILABLE. TEXT IN ORIGINAL IS CLOSE TO THE EDGE OF THE PAGE ABSTRACT The army with which Alexander the Great conquered the Persian empire was "built around the Macedonian Companion cavalry and the Macedonian heavy infantry. The Macedonian nobility were traditionally fine horsemen, hut the infantry was poorly armed and badly organised until the reign of Alexander II in 369/8 B.C. This king formed a small royal standing army; it consisted of a cavalry force of Macedonian nobles, which he named the 'hetairoi' (or Companion]! cavalry, and an infantry body drawn from the commoners and trained to fight in phalangite formation: these he called the »pezetairoi» (or foot-companions). Philip II (359-336 B.C.) expanded the kingdom and greatly increased the manpower resources for war. Towards the end of his reign he started preparations for the invasion of the Persian empire and levied many more Macedonians than had hitherto been involved in the king's wars. In order to attach these men more closely to himself he extended the meaning of the terms »hetairol» and 'pezetairoi to refer to the whole bodies of Macedonian cavalry and heavy infantry which served under him on his campaigning.
    [Show full text]
  • Antiochus Epiphanes
    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 10-1944 Antiochus Epiphanes. Brougher Petty Maddox University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Maddox, Brougher Petty, "Antiochus Epiphanes." (1944). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 2011. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/2011 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. • UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE ANTIOCHUS EPIPHANES A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Louisville In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Kaster of Arts Department of History by Brougher Petty Maddox .. \ 1944 -T .4 .4¥ To ,Ida Roe and c. ,Sidney Maddox, my,parents, I, in affectionate appreciation. ABBREVIATIONS App. Syr. Appian, ~oman History Book XI, Ia! Syrian ~. Bactria W. W. Tarn, IQ! Greeks !n Bactria and India. ~ British Museum Catalogue , ) , t CAB Cambridge Ancient HistorI. Diod~ Sic. Diodorus Siculus, Bibliotheea \ t Hel. Q1!. W. W. Tarn, Hellenistic Civilisation ~ # I ( H. W. M. Rostovtzeff, Social ~ Economic History 2t the Hellenistic World, 3 Vols. House Sel. E. R. Bevan, House of Seleucus, Vol. II. Bevan, Egypt E. R. Bevan, A History Q! Egypt.
    [Show full text]
  • The Armies of the Hasmonaeans and Herod
    Texte und Studien zum Antiken Judentum herausgegeben von Martin Hengel und Peter Schäfer 25 The Armies of the Hasmonaeans and Herod From Hellenistic to Roman Frameworks by Israel Shatzman J.C.B. Möhr (Paul Siebeck) Tübingen Die Deutsche Bibliothek - CIP-Einheitsaufnahme Shatzman, Israel: The armies of the Hasmonaeans and Herod : from Hellenistic to Roman frameworks / by Israel Shatzman. - Tübingen : Mohr, 1991 (Texte und Studien zum antiken Judentum ; 25) ISBN 3-16-145617-3 NE: GT © 1991 J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck) P.O. Box 2040, D-7400 Tübingen. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that permitted by copyright law) without the publisher's written permission. This applies particularly to re- productions, translations, microfilms and storage and processing in electronic systems. The book was typeset by Sam Boyd Enterprise in Singapore, printed by Guide-Druck in Tübingen on non-aging paper by Gebr. Buhl in Ettlingen and bound by Heinr. Koch in Tübingen. ISSN 0721-8753 MENAHEM STERN IN MEMORIAM Preface I became intrigued by the subject of this book in the course of my work on the military confrontation between the Jews and the Romans from the death of Herod to the War of Bar-Kokhva, which I was asked to contribute to Vol. VIII of the series The World History of the Jewish People: U. Rappaport (ed.), Judea and Rome (Masada Publishing Press, 1983, in Hebrew). While working on those chapters, I realized that no com- prehensive account had ever been written of the army of Herod, and as for the Hasmonaeans, there existed then only B.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Macedonians
    Ancient Macedonians This article is about the native inhabitants of the historical kingdom of Macedonia. For the modern ethnic Greek people from Macedonia, Greece, see Macedonians (Greeks). For other uses, see Ancient Macedonian (disambiguation) and Macedonian (disambiguation). From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ANCIENT MACEDONIANS ΜΑΚΕΔΌΝΕΣ Stag Hunt Mosaic, 4th century BC Languages. Ancient Macedonian, then Attic Greek, and later Koine Greek Religion. ancient Greek religion The Macedonians (Greek: Μακεδόνες, Makedónes) were an ancient tribe that lived on the alluvial plain around the rivers Haliacmonand lower Axios in the northeastern part of mainland Greece. Essentially an ancient Greek people,[1] they gradually expanded from their homeland along the Haliacmon valley on the northern edge of the Greek world, absorbing or driving out neighbouring non-Greek tribes, primarily Thracian and Illyrian.[2][3] They spoke Ancient Macedonian, a language closely related to Ancient Greek, perhaps a dialect, although the prestige language of the region was at first Attic and then Koine Greek.[4] Their religious beliefs mirrored those of other Greeks, following the main deities of the Greek pantheon, although the Macedonians continued Archaic burial practices that had ceased in other parts of Greece after the 6th century BC. Aside from the monarchy, the core of Macedonian society was its nobility. Similar to the aristocracy of neighboring Thessaly, their wealth was largely built on herding horses and cattle. Although composed of various clans, the kingdom of Macedonia, established around the 8th century BC, is mostly associated with the Argead dynasty and the tribe named after it. The dynasty was allegedly founded by Perdiccas I, descendant of the legendary Temenus of Argos, while the region of Macedon perhaps derived its name from Makedon, a figure of Greek mythology.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander's Funeral Games: the Wars of the Successors
    ANCIENT APR/MAY 2009 WARFARE VOL III, ISSUE 2 Alexander’s funeral games: the wars of the Successors With: • Demetrius’ outrageous fortune • Gabiene - the fight for Asia Also: • Entertaining the troops • A soldier from Herculaneum € 7,10 £ 6,25 Ancient Warfare 1 www.ancient-warfare.com Copyright Karwansaray BV AW nr2-2009.indd 1 11-02-2010 16:31:31 AW nr2-2009.indd 2 11-02-2010 16:31:36 ANCIENT WARFARE CONTENTS Apr/May 2009 4 NEWS 29 THE FIGHT Publisher: Rolof van Hövell tot Westerflier, MA, MCL Publisher’s assistant: Gabrielle Terlaak FOR ASIA Editor in chief: Jasper L. Oorthuys, MA THEME The battle Sales and marketing: Tharin Clarijs Alexander’s funeral games of Gabiene Website design: Christianne C. Beall Art and layout consultant: Matthew C. Lanteigne INTRODUCTION Contributors: Bob Bennett, Duncan B.Campbell, 6 Murray Dahm, Raffaele D’Amato, Svenja Grosser, Ed Haines, Christian Koepfer, Konstantin Nossov, 37 THE FIND Michael Park, Joseph Pietrykowski, Mike Roberts, The sarissa Michael Thomas Illustrations: Andrew Brozyna, Igor Dzis, Brendan Keeley, Carlos de la Rocha, Johnny Shumate, Graham Sumner 38 SPECIAL Design & layout: © MeSa Design, 10 THE SOURCE For training and entertainment e-mail: [email protected] Philon of Byzantium Print: PublisherPartners. www.publisherpartners.com Editorial office PO Box 1574, 6501 BN Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Phone: +44-20-88168281 (Europe) +1-740-994-0091 (US). E-mail: [email protected] Skype: ancient_warfare 42 THE Website: www.ancient-warfare.com WARRIOR Contributions in the form of articles, letters and que- From ries from readers are welcomed. Please send to the Herculaneum’s above address or use the contact form on our website.
    [Show full text]
  • Diadochi Warloards V5.6
    DIADOCHI WARLORDS Epic Roleplaying Amid the Ruins of Alexander's Empire For Design Mechanism's MYTHRAS/RQ6 Roleplaying Game ZOZER Game Designs Text © Paul Elliott 2004 Contributions by Tom Syvertsen (Alexander the Great), Romeo Reyes (Ptolemy I & II), Maximillian Cairduff and Kelley L. Ross (Antigonid History). C Brann conversion to MYTHRAS/RQ6 plus other changes CONTENTS INTRODUCTION PART I ALEXANDER THE GREAT THE SUCCESSOR KINGDOMS DAILY LIFE CALENDAR PART II CREATING CHARACTERS GODS, PHILOSOPHERS & MAGIC BUILDING A CAMPAIGN APPENDIX - References INTRODUCTION "It is my belief that there was in those days no nation, no city, no individual beyond the reach of Alexander's name; never in all the world was there another like him ..." Arrian, The Campaigns of Alexander Centaur, dryad, griffin, gorgon - creatures like these litter the pages of most fantasy roleplaying games. Creatures from Greek myth. Of course, there are plenty of other entries that would fit nicely into a Greek campaign with a suitable name change: giants, passion spirits and so on. The great pull of roleplaying the ancient Greeks, however, is not the 'fit' of many monsters or races, but the unique and atmospheric society of the day. Nodding horse-hair crests, long-shadowed spears, many-columned temples of marble, triremes surging across turquoise seas guided by painted eyes on the prow, phalanxes of grim hoplites, nonconformist philosophers debating science under shady colonnades ... classical Greece. DIADOCHI WARLORDS [DW] is a historical fantasy setting for the MYTHRAS/RQ6 Roleplaying Game. A gamesmaster need only have a copy of the MYTHRAS/RQ6 rules or the essentials version to play.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 18: Young Alex
    3/15/2012 Lecture 18: Young Alex HIST 332 Spring 2012 Kingdom of Macedonia • Natural resources – fertile soil, timber, precious metals, horses • Large population – 2x bigger than any polis in Greece – potential for large army • Maintained a kingdom – similar to that seen in Homer – “Heroic Monarchy” Macedonian culture Retained archaic features: • Palace-culture at Pella resembles Homeric kingship • Multiple wives (political) – Epirote queen Olympias, mother of Alexander • Hereditary Monarchy – contrasted sharply with the Greek cultures further south, where city-states possessed oligarchic or democratic institutions • Feudal Institutions (serfdom) 1 3/15/2012 Philip II of Macedon • King Perdiccas III has infant heir, but he is deposed by youngest brother Philip – made himself king • inherits a weak, divided kingdom • ushers in a period of Macedonian dominance of Greece. Philip II Macedon Glyptotek, Munich Macedonian Army Reorganization • creates Elite Heavy infantry (Hypaspists) – agema or private bodyguard – [Silver Shields] • creates “foot companions” – (pezhetairoi) – Philip had been a “hostage” in Thebes and witnessed Theban “Sacred Band” • Training and Funding – used his own money to pay citizens to serve in the army, provide weapons and armor – Took time to properly train his men 2 feet Macedonian Phalanx with sarissa 16 feet • 15-18 foot pike (head = 2 feet long) • sliced through shields and armor like a sword • very effective against hoplite shield 8 feet 2 3/15/2012 New Cavalry weapons and tactics • Philip creates “Companions”
    [Show full text]
  • PHILIP II and the CONSTRUCTION of the MACEDONIAN STATE By
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by The University of Utah: J. Willard Marriott Digital Library PHILIP II AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE MACEDONIAN STATE by Cynthia Kimball Phillips A thesis submitted to the faculty of The University of Utah in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of History The University of Utah August 2012 Copyright © Cynthia Kimball Phillips 2012 All Rights Reserved The University of Utah Graduate School STATEMENT OF THESIS APPROVAL The thesis of Cynthia Kimball Phillips has been approved by the following supervisory committee members: W. Lindsay Adams , Chair May 9, 2012 Date Approved Isabel Moreira , Member May 9, 2012 Date Approved Margaret Toscano , Member May 9, 2012 Date Approved and by Isabel Moreira , Chair of the Department of History and by Charles A. Wight, Dean of The Graduate School. ABSTRACT The accomplishments of Philip II of Macedonia have long been overshadowed by those of his son, Alexander the Great, due to the spectacular nature of Alexander’s achievements and to the survival of ancient sources, though written later, that have documented Alexander’s reign. Little remains of the histories or writings of Philip’s contemporaries, and those that do remain are hostile to Philip and almost exclusively pro- Athenian. Ancient sources focus on Philip’s diplomacy, imperialism, and character flaws—all from the view of outsiders watching Philip’s actions against their Greek states. These ancient literary sources have necessarily focused the modern discussion of Greece in the 4th century BC on those same subjects and away from a survey of Philip’s policies, systems, and successes within Macedonia.
    [Show full text]