DOCSLIB.ORG

Frontiers 2013 Progress Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Frontiers 2013 Progress Report frontiers | 2013 Progress Report 1 2013 Progress Report An incredible year of community-driven growth 2 frontiers | 2013 Progress Report Kamila Markram CEO of Frontiers n November 2014, one of the 5 largest working with you to build we will celebrate our open-access publishers a publishing platform I7th birthday and (out of approximately focused on academic I’m thrilled by the many 3 000). communities and your achievements we have needs. We keep taking reached together. As of The other remarkable your feedback into account today, we have published event in 2013 was our to build a simpler, faster and almost 20 000 articles, are partnership with Nature more efficient publishing growing at a rate of almost Publishing Group, which system, and a peer review 100% per year and several has further enhanced that is rigorous, but also of our journals are Frontiers’ standing and fair, constructive and already at the top of their prestige in the academic transparent. We build subject categories. For publishing world. online metrics to give example, Frontiers in immediate feedback Psychology, launched in Combining NPG’s on the impact of your 2010, has become the established brand of research. We work to make largest psychology journal world-renowned prestige your work more accessible worldwide. Frontiers and more than 130 to researchers in other in Immunology, Frontiers years in publishing with disciplines and to the in Physiology and Frontiers’ transformative more general audience. Frontiers in Plant Science solutions to publish, We take open access to a are all the largest open- share and boost impact, new level by feeding your access journals in their opened up a wealth articles into the Frontiers respective categories. of opportunities to lead Research Network to the change in how disseminate them to the Between 2013 and early science is published right people and boost 2014, we expanded our and communicated. your reach and impact. open-access “Frontiers in” journal series into 16 new Our mission has not Frontiers is taking off fields. Frontiers currently changed since our at unprecedented speed spans 28 fields, 300 founding days in 2007, and developing into one specialties with over when we, as scientists, of the most successful 40000 leading scientists decided to take publishing endeavours in the and clinicians on the into our own hands. scholarly publishing editorial boards. We also landscape. Thanks to all set a new record in yearly Frontiers stands for Open of you who were part publications, which now Science and builds online of this incredible year of stands at almost 7500 tools to publish, share and community-driven growth. articles published in 2013, boost the impact of your It’s an honour to take this making Frontiers research. We keep journey with you. Lausanne, April 2014 frontiers | 2013 Progress Report 3 “Frontiers represents the future for science communication” Michael Merzenich University of California, San Francisco 2013 Frontiers milestones January February March April th PARTNERSHIP NEW 10 000 with RECORD 6 million article 100 daily monthy published submissions page views May June July August th NATURE th 150 100 000 cover 20 ebook active field journal published users launched September October November December th YOUNG REVIEW 35 000 20 000 MINDS FORUM scientific manuscript launched in beta version editors submitted 4 frontiers | 2013 Progress Report Embracing academic communities At Frontiers, our approach for our journals, we take to publishing is community great care - and great EDITORS 36’274 driven. It involves first pride - in our editorial understanding niche boards and only appoint communities within a the leading researchers 25’485 field, and then building and clinicians from each 20’952 a Field Journal embracing academic community. these communities’ needs. We carefully subdivide Since research is 10’714 each field into numerous increasingly multi- Specialty Sections, thus disciplinary, our 2’713 612 1’501 framing an entire subject area platform is designed to through its communities. facilitate synergies across 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 neighboring research areas In order to ensure by allowing shared Specialty the highest standards Sections amongst fields. ARTICLES PUBLISHED 7’389 5’023 Editors among top 5% 2’416 of researchers in the world 1’178 408 69 127 40 000 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 high-profile editors EDITORS BY COUNTRIES 28 Others (11%) USA (36%) fields in Science, Technology and Medicine Denmark (1%) India (1%) Israel (1%) 300 Belgium (1%) communities Brazil (1%) Sweden (1%) Switzerland (2%) China (2%) 140 Netherlands (2%) countries Spain (2%) Australia (3%) Japan (3%) United Kingdom (7%) Canada (3%) 20 000 Italy (4%) articles published France (4%) Germany (6%) (as of April 2014) frontiers | 2013 Progress Report 5 2008 Frontiers in Neuroscience Field Journals Frontiers in Psychiatry No. 1 journal in Psychology* Frontiers in Psychology Frontiers in Neurology are top players No. 1 open-access journal in Physiology* Frontiers in Physiology Frontiers in Pharmacology No. 1 open-access journal In 2008, Frontiers open-access journals in Plant Science* Frontiers in Plant Science No. 3 open-access journal pioneered the Field in their respective in Microbiology* Frontiers in Microbiology Journal concept in the categories. No. 1 open-access journal field of Neuroscience in Immunology* Frontiers in Immunology and, within three years, In addition to these No. 2 open-access journal in Endocrinology* Frontiers in Endocrinology had branched out to 12 established titles, 11 other areas across 16 new Field Journals Frontiers in Genetics medicine and science. were launched between Frontiers in Oncology Today, our 12 original the end of 2012 and Field Journals are among the beginning of 2014, the most established now covering a total 2013 Frontiers in Pediatrics in their subject areas, of 28 fields across 300 both in terms of size and specialty sections. Our Frontiers in Chemistry citation levels. Frontiers aim is to ensure that every Frontiers in Public Health in Psychology, became community in all areas the world’s largest journal of natural, medical Frontiers in Bioengineering in Psychology only and social sciences can and Biotechnology 3 years after it was find an open-access home Frontiers in Physics launched in 2010. at Frontiers. Frontiers in Immunology, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution Frontiers in Physiology It is with this vision Frontiers in Energy Research and Frontiers in Plant that we keep working on Science are the largest new launches in 2014. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology IMPACT FACTORS Frontiers in Earth Science Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience: 5.2 Frontiers in Environmental Science Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience: 4.8 Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience: 4.5 Frontiers in Marine Science Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology: 2014 coming July 2014! Frontiers in Materials Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience: 2.5 Frontiers in Nutrition Frontiers in Human Neuroscience: 2.9 Frontiers in Microbiology: coming July 2014! Frontiers in Medicine Frontiers in Neural Circuits: 3.3 Frontiers in Surgery Frontiers in Neuroanatomy: 4.1 Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences Frontiers in Plant Science: coming July 2014! Frontiers in Psychology: coming July 2014! coming Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences soon * compared to the journal listing of the Frontiers in Robotics and AI 2012 Journal Citation Report for this subject category. Publication volume determined for 2013 with Scopus. Frontiers in Veterinary Medicine All journals are listed in PubMed and Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine archives relevant for each subject area. All remaining 9 field journals launched before 2013 are under evaluation Frontiers in Digital Humanities by Thomson Reuters for the release of an Impact Factor. Stay tuned! … and more! 6 frontiers | 2013 Progress Report “The new review forum Building impact is exceptionally clear. I particularly like the level of detail of where the article through is in the review process” Cheryl Metcalf peer review about version 2.0 of the Review Forum Improving peer review Frontiers Review Forum, of Frontiers articles Review Forum is now has always been which facilitates are a strong evidence even more user-friendly, a priority at Frontiers. consensus by opening of it. Frontiers journals intuitive and Our peer review is a direct dialogue among consistently outrank task-oriented, and was engineered to be rigorous, authors, reviewers some of the most released as a beta yet at the same time and editors. established journals version in December. collaborative, fair, both in terms of citation efficient and transparent. Our peer review is levels and volume. Feedback from hundreds engineered to contribute of scientists has been These guiding principles to the quality of In 2013, we carried out enthusiastic and we are have been integrated into manuscripts, and the high substantial enhancements really excited to move the most sophisticated numbers of citations, to our Review Forum. this development forward online review platform, the views and downloads The 2.0 version of the in 2014! “Instead of rejecting a paper a priori, we want to help the scientific community to improve a paper. Review It’s scientists helping other scientists principles to make things better - together” COLLABORATIVE Idan Segev FAIR about the philosophy of peer review at Frontiers RIGOROUS EFFICIENT TRANSPARENT 84 days • 80% of authors think the Frontiers peer review is a significant
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nuclear Medicine in the Context of Personalized Medicine
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE IN THE CONTEXT OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE EDITED BY : Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré, Francesco Cicone, Pierre Payoux and Myriam Bernaudin PUBLISHED IN : Frontiers in Medicine Frontiers eBook Copyright Statement About Frontiers The copyright in the text of individual articles in this eBook is the Frontiers is more than just an open-access publisher of scholarly articles: it is a property of their respective authors or their respective institutions or pioneering approach to the world of academia, radically improving the way scholarly funders. The copyright in graphics research is managed. The grand vision of Frontiers is a world where all people have and images within each article may be subject to copyright of other an equal opportunity to seek, share and generate knowledge. Frontiers provides parties. In both cases this is subject immediate and permanent online open access to all its publications, but this alone to a license granted to Frontiers. is not enough to realize our grand goals. The compilation of articles constituting this eBook is the property of Frontiers. Frontiers Journal Series Each article within this eBook, and the eBook itself, are published under The Frontiers Journal Series is a multi-tier and interdisciplinary set of open-access, the most recent version of the Creative Commons CC-BY licence. online journals, promising a paradigm shift from the current review, selection and The version current at the date of dissemination processes in academic publishing. All Frontiers journals are driven publication of this eBook is CC-BY 4.0. If the CC-BY licence is by researchers for researchers; therefore, they constitute a service to the scholarly updated, the licence granted by community.
    [Show full text]
  • Preprints in Medicine: Useful Or Harmful?
    OPINION published: 22 September 2020 doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.579100 Preprints in Medicine: Useful or Harmful? Bruno Bonnechère 1,2* 1 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2 Public Health School, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium Keywords: preprint, publications, data repository, public, publication science INTRODUCTION Research and its associated publications have had a considerable impact on the care and monitoring of the patients since evidence-based medicine became standard for modern medicine during the 1990s (1). Peer-reviewing is a fundamental component of scientific publication. The peer-review process first includes an evaluation of the quality and interest in the paper for the reader of the journal by the editor who, if he or she considers the article to be of interest, sends it to the external reviewers (2). If the paper is found to be interesting and of sufficient quality, the reviewers ask questions and make comments to which the researcher must respond in a rebuttal letter. If the answers are satisfactory, the article can be published. This is a time-consuming process, typically lasting months, and authors complain about the review time, which has been relatively stable since Edited by: the 1980s (3). Sandor Kerpel-Fronius, Semmelweis University, Hungary THE EVOLUTION OF SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS Reviewed by: Lise Aagaard, In previous decades, the world of scientific publishing has changed enormously with an explosion Independent Researcher, in the number of publishers and journals. Therefore, there has been an exponential increase in the Copenhagen, Denmark number of scientific papers published (4).
    [Show full text]
  • Open Peer Review: the Current Landscape and Emerging Models
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange School of Information Sciences -- Faculty Publications and Other Works School of Information Sciences 2019 Open Peer Review: The Current Landscape and Emerging Models Dietmar Wolfram University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee School of Information Studies, [email protected] Peiling Wang University of Tennessee - Knoxville School of Information Sciences, [email protected] Hyoungjoo Park University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee School of Information Studies, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_infosciepubs Part of the Scholarly Communication Commons, and the Scholarly Publishing Commons Recommended Citation Dietmar Wolfram, Peiling Wang, & Hyoungjoo Park (2019) Open peer review: the current landscape and emerging models. In Proceedings of the The 17th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics (September 2-5, 2019, Rome, Italy) This Conference Proceeding is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Information Sciences at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in School of Information Sciences -- Faculty Publications and Other Works by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Open Peer Review: The Current Landscape and Emerging Models Dietmar Wolfram1, Peiling Wang2 and Hyoungjoo Park3 1 [email protected]; 3 [email protected] School of Information Studies University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Milwaukee, WI 53211, USA 2 [email protected] School of Information Sciences University of Tennessee, Knoxville Knoxville, TN 37996, USA Abstract Open peer review (OPR) is an important innovation in the open science movement. OPR can play a significant role in advancing scientific communication by increasing its transparency.
    [Show full text]
  • Article Processing Charges for Open Access Publication—The Situation for Research Intensive Universities in the USA and Canada
    Article processing charges for open access publication—the situation for research intensive universities in the USA and Canada David Solomon1 and Bo-Christer Björk2 1 Internal Medicine/Office of Medical Education Research and Development, Michigan State University, E Lansing, MI, United States 2 Information Systems Science, Hanken School of Economics, Helsinki, Finland ABSTRACT Background. Open access (OA) publishing via article processing charges (APCs) is growing as an alternative to subscription publishing. The Pay It Forward (PIF) Project is exploring the feasibility of transitioning from paying subscriptions to funding APCs for faculty at research intensive universities. Estimating of the cost of APCs for the journals authors at research intensive universities tend to publish is essential for the PIF project and similar initiatives. This paper presents our research into this question. Methods. We identified APC prices for publications by authors at the 4 research intensive United States (US) and Canadian universities involved in the study. We also obtained APC payment records from several Western European universities and funding agencies. Both data sets were merged with Web of Science (WoS) metadata. We calculated the average APCs for articles and proceedings in 13 discipline categories published by researchers at research intensive universities. We also identified 41 journals published by traditionally subscription publishers which have recently converted to APC funded OA and recorded the APCs they charge. Results. We identified 7,629 payment records from the 4 European APC payment databases and 14,356 OA articles authored by PIF partner university faculty for which Submitted 28 April 2016 we had listed APC prices. APCs for full OA journals published by PIF authors averaged Accepted 27 June 2016 1,775 USD; full OA journal APCs paid by Western European funders averaged 1,865 Published 21 July 2016 USD; hybrid APCs paid by Western European funders averaged 2,887 USD.
    [Show full text]
  • Apcs – Mirroring the Impact Factor Or Legacy of the Subscription-Based Model?
    APCs – Mirroring the impact factor or legacy of the subscription-based model? 3rd ESAC Workshop „On the Effectiveness of APCs“ Munich, 28.06.2018 Dr. Nina Schönfelder Agenda Background Data Method Results Limitations and potential weaknesses Conclusion 28.06.2018 3. ESAC Workshop – Dr. Nina Schönfelder – OA2020-DE NOAK Working Package 4 Analysing financial flows, shaping financial models, and consultation with funders 28.06.2018 3. ESAC Workshop – Dr. Nina Schönfelder – OA2020-DE Aim Analysing the determinants for APC-levels Projecting APCs for currently closed-access journals Comparing projected total APC-spending with libraries budgets‘ for each German university/research institute after a hypothetical full journal flipping Similar approach as in the “Pay It Forward”-study conducted at the University of California Libraries 28.06.2018 3. ESAC Workshop – Dr. Nina Schönfelder – OA2020-DE Data OpenAPC data set (part of the INTACT project at the Bielefeld University Library, Germany) • APCs actually paid (in contract to catalogue prices) • country, period, journal type (hybrid/oa), journal title, pubisher CWTS Journal Indicators (calculated by Leiden University’s Centre for Science and Technology Studies based on the Scopus bibliographic database produced by Elsevier) • “source normalized impact per paper” (SNIP) • subject area of the journal 28.06.2018 3. ESAC Workshop – Dr. Nina Schönfelder – OA2020-DE Summary statistics country institution period GBR :24572 UCL : 4526 2016 :16210 DEU :14054 FWF - Austrian Science Fund: 4205
    [Show full text]
  • Predatory Open Access Journals in a Performance-Based Funding Model
    Predatory open access journals in a performance-based funding model: A comparison of journals in version VI of the VABB-SHW with Beall’s list and DOAJ Report submitted to the Gezaghebbende Panel 23 December 2015 Expertisecentrum Onderzoek en Ontwikkelingsmonitoring - ECOOM Faculteit Sociale Wetenschappen Universiteit Antwerpen A.I.M. Jakaria Rahman, Raf Guns & Tim C.E. Engels 1 Introduction In academic publishing some publishers are exploiting the model of open access publishing. These publishers may e.g. accept manuscripts that are flawed in terms of scientific or scholarly quality or charge fees to authors without providing essential editorial and publishing services. These publishers are known as predatory open access publishers. The term ‘predatory open access’ (POA) was coined by Jeffrey Beall, librarian and associate professor at Auraria Library, University of Colorado, Denver, USA. In response to a number of questions by the research community regarding the possible occurrence of predatory open access journals in the VABB-SHW1 journal list, the bureau of the Authoritative Panel (Gezaghebbende Panel or GP) asked ECOOM-UAntwerpen to compare both lists in order to identify any overlap. ECOOM-UAntwerpen accepted this task and set out to identify the journals belonging to the publishers listed on Beall’s list mid October 2013. This resulted in a report by Rahman, Dexters and Engels (2014) submitted to the GP in February 2014. As a result, the GP decided, with the support of the vice- chancellors for research, to exclude articles published with predatory open access publishers from the VABB-SHW as of version IV, launched June 2014. In addition, the GP invited all universities to raise awareness about POA publishing amongst their researchers, and asked ECOOM-UAntwerpen to provide a yearly monitoring of the occurrence of predatory journals in the list submitted to them.
    [Show full text]
  • Scholarly Communication and Open Access in Psychology: Current Considerations for Researchers
    1 Scholarly Communication and Open Access in Psychology: Current Considerations for Researchers Laura Bowering Mullen Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Author Note Laura Bowering Mullen, Rutgers University-New Brunswick, Library of Science and Medicine Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Laura Bowering Mullen, Behavioral Sciences Librarian; Open Access Specialist, Rutgers University-New Brunswick Libraries, Library of Science and Medicine, Piscataway, NJ 08854. Contact: [email protected] 2 Contents Scholarly Communication and Open Access in Psychology: Current Considerations for Researchers Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………….. 4 Recent History of Scholarly/Scientific Communication Specific to Psychology………… 8 Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration in Psychology …………………….……… 9 Coauthorship and Assignment of Credit in Psychology Scholarship……………….…… 11 Information Overload and Inertia for Changing the Existing System…………....……… 14 Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) for every Article and other Research Output….………. 16 An ORCID iD for every Researcher………………………………………………………. 17 The Growth of Open Access: A Boon for Authors, Readers, Researchers, and Institutions.18 Institutional Open Access Policies and the Institutional Repositories used for their Implementation…….…………….……………………………………………....……. ….. 20 Green Open Access: Strategies for Author Self-archiving of Works in Digital Repositories and other Services…………………………………………………………………………. 22 The Continuing Emergence of Preprints: Online Dissemination
    [Show full text]
  • Accepted for Publication in Meta-Psychology Conducting High
    Accepted for publication in Meta-Psychology Conducting High Impact Research with Limited Financial Resources (While Working From Home) Paul H. P. Hanel1,2 * 1Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom 2Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom * Please address correspondence to Paul Hanel, Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom. [email protected] Acknowledgements. I wish to thank Martha Fitch Little and Wijnand van Tilburg for useful comments on an earlier version of this paper. Data availability. Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no data were created or analysed in this study. 1 Abstract The Covid-19 pandemic has far-reaching implications for researchers. For example, many researchers cannot access their labs anymore and are hit by budget-cuts from their institutions. Luckily, there are a range of ways how high-quality research can be conducted without funding and face-to-face interactions. In the present paper, I discuss nine such possibilities, including meta-analyses, secondary data analyses, web-scrapping, scientometrics, or sharing one’s expert knowledge (e.g., writing tutorials). Most of these possibilities can be done from home, as they require only access to a computer, the internet, and time; but no state-of-the art equipment or funding to pay for participants. Thus, they are particularly relevant for researchers with limited financial resources beyond pandemics and quarantines. Keywords: resources; meta-analysis; secondary data-analysis; Covid-19 2 Conducting High Impact Research with Limited Financial Resources (While Working from Home) Lower student numbers and a general economic recession caused by global quarantine measures to control the Covid-19 pandemic are putting a lot of pressure on universities and researchers (Adams, 2020).
    [Show full text]
  • Epistemological and Ethical Aspects of Research in the Social Sciences
    EPISTEMOLOGICAL AND ETHICAL ASPECTS OF RESEARCH IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITED BY : Ulrich Dettweiler, Barbara Hanfstingl and Hannes Schröter PUBLISHED IN : Frontiers in Psychology and Frontiers in Education Frontiers eBook Copyright Statement About Frontiers The copyright in the text of individual articles in this eBook is the Frontiers is more than just an open-access publisher of scholarly articles: it is a property of their respective authors or their respective institutions or pioneering approach to the world of academia, radically improving the way scholarly funders. The copyright in graphics research is managed. The grand vision of Frontiers is a world where all people have and images within each article may be subject to copyright of other an equal opportunity to seek, share and generate knowledge. Frontiers provides parties. In both cases this is subject immediate and permanent online open access to all its publications, but this alone to a license granted to Frontiers. is not enough to realize our grand goals. The compilation of articles constituting this eBook is the property of Frontiers. Frontiers Journal Series Each article within this eBook, and the eBook itself, are published under The Frontiers Journal Series is a multi-tier and interdisciplinary set of open-access, the most recent version of the Creative Commons CC-BY licence. online journals, promising a paradigm shift from the current review, selection and The version current at the date of dissemination processes in academic publishing. All Frontiers journals are driven publication of this eBook is CC-BY 4.0. If the CC-BY licence is by researchers for researchers; therefore, they constitute a service to the scholarly updated, the licence granted by community.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliometric Analysis on Emotional Intelligence Research
    International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE) ISSN: 2277-3878, Volume-8 Issue-6, March 2020 Bibliometric Analysis on Emotional Intelligence Research Heamalatha Krishnan, Siti Rahmah Awang, Norhayati Zakuan, Khalil Md Nor emotions of others [2]. Related to the increased importance of Abstract: The concept of Emotional Intelligence (EI) has emotional competencies in the 21st century, we focus in this gained a great amount of public popularity and business attention research on EI. There are three relevant models of EI: Ability in the past two decades. EI is currently considered a broadly Model, Mixed Models and Trait Model. The term “EI” recognized practitioner instrument for hiring, training, leadership development, and team building by the business people. In this appeared first in Peter Salovey and Jack Mayer’s ability context, the analysis of the evolution and development of this model defining EI as a cognitive ability [3]. In 1995 Daniel concept is crucial. In order to do so, this study presents the global Goleman introduced his book Emotional Intelligence: Why It research trends in EI area. The article presents a bibliometric Can Matter More Than IQ, in which he suggests a new analysis of 4297 journal articles on EI. These works come from performance based EI model that includes self-awareness, the Scopus database for the period 1966-2018. The study sorts these articles according to the following bibliographic indicators: self-regulation, motivation, empathy and social skills [4]. journal with most published research, highly cited articles, Finally, [5] propose the distinction of EI as a trait and as an countries with the highest rate of productivity, prolific authors, ability.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolving Ecosystem of Predatory Journals: a Case Study in Indian Perspective
    The Evolving Ecosystem of Predatory Journals: A Case Study in Indian Perspective Naman Jain, Mayank Singh Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, GJ, India fnaman.j, [email protected] Abstract. Digital advancement in scholarly repositories has led to the emergence of a large number of open access predatory publishers that charge high article processing fees from authors but fail to provide nec- essary editorial and publishing services. Identifying and blacklisting such publishers has remained a research challenge due to the highly volatile scholarly publishing ecosystem. This paper presents a data-driven ap- proach to study how potential predatory publishers are evolving and bypassing several regularity constraints. We empirically show the close resemblance of predatory publishers against reputed publishing groups. In addition to verifying standard constraints, we also propose distinc- tive signals gathered from network-centric properties to understand this evolving ecosystem better. To facilitate reproducible research, we shall make all the codes and the processed dataset available in the public domain. Keywords: Predatory Journals, Publication Ethics, Open Access and Digital Library 1 Introduction Scholarly journals play an essential role in the growth of science and technol- ogy. They provide an information sharing platform for researchers to publish and access scientific literature. However, high monthly access costs, pay-per- view models, complicated and lengthy publication process restrict researchers to leverage such knowledge. Open access journals (OAJ) emerged as a solution to abolish high access charges, with provision for unrestricted access to the latest findings. OAJs operate by charging article processing fees from the authors with a promising commitment of rigorous peer-review to maintain the quality and academic standard.
    [Show full text]
  • The Silent Cry: How to Turn Translational Medicine Towards Patients and Unmet Medical Needs
    THE SILENT CRY: HOW TO TURN TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE TOWARDS PATIENTS AND UNMET MEDICAL NEEDS EDITED BY : Manuela Battaglia, Berent Prakken, Norman D. Rosenblum and Salvatore Albani PUBLISHED IN : Frontiers in Medicine, Frontiers in Psychology and Frontiers in Public Health Frontiers eBook Copyright Statement About Frontiers The copyright in the text of individual articles in this eBook is the Frontiers is more than just an open-access publisher of scholarly articles: it is a property of their respective authors or their respective institutions or pioneering approach to the world of academia, radically improving the way scholarly funders. The copyright in graphics research is managed. The grand vision of Frontiers is a world where all people have and images within each article may be subject to copyright of other an equal opportunity to seek, share and generate knowledge. Frontiers provides parties. In both cases this is subject immediate and permanent online open access to all its publications, but this alone to a license granted to Frontiers. is not enough to realize our grand goals. The compilation of articles constituting this eBook is the property of Frontiers. Frontiers Journal Series Each article within this eBook, and the eBook itself, are published under The Frontiers Journal Series is a multi-tier and interdisciplinary set of open-access, the most recent version of the Creative Commons CC-BY licence. online journals, promising a paradigm shift from the current review, selection and The version current at the date of dissemination processes in academic publishing. All Frontiers journals are driven publication of this eBook is CC-BY 4.0.
    [Show full text]