Anonymity for Defendants ? Complainants of Sexual Off Ences

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Anonymity for Defendants ? Complainants of Sexual Off Ences Sexual Off ences Act Legal Principles CRIMINAL BAR QUARTERLY ISSUE 3 | AUTUMN 2017 Anonymity for Defendants ? Complainants of Sexual Off ences IPP: Left in Limbo Publication of Change the test for release “[the authors’] knowledge of this area of law is clearly comprehensive…” Landlord & Tenant Review Tenants’ Right of First Refusal A comprehensive and authoritative guide to all aspects of a residential tenant’s right of first refusal under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987. This new edition has been extensively revised and updated and takes on board the latest developments in the field, including important new case-law such as Artists Court Collective Ltd v Khan (2016). Product code: TRFR3 Publication date: April 2017 ISBN: 9781784732677 Price: £90 Place your order today Call: +44 (0)330 161 1234 Email: [email protected] Online: www.lexisnexis.co.uk/TRFR17 RELX (UK) Limited, trading as LexisNexis®. Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR. Registered in England number 2746621. VAT Registered No. GB 730 8595 20. LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are registered trademarks of RELX Inc. © 2017 LexisNexis SA-0517-046. The information in this document is current as of May 2017 and is subject to change without notice. Criminal Bar Quarterly | Autumn 2017 - Issue 3 CONTENTS VIEW FROMCHAIR'S THE COLUMN EDITOR 3 CBA COMMITTEE MEMBERS FEATURED IN THIS ISSUE EXECUTIVE OFFICERS Chair Director of Education 3 McNaughten Angela Raff erty QC James Mulholland QC John Cooper QC Vice - Chairman Deputy Director of Chris Henley QC Education Treasurer Sophie Shotton 4 An Impossible Dream? Gillian Jones QC Equality and Diversity Secretary Director Angela Raff erty QC Donal Lawler Eleanor Mawrey Assistant Secretary CBQ Editor Emma Fern John Cooper QC 6 IPP: Left in Limbo Director of International A ff a i r s Mark George QC Michael Duck QC ELECTED MEMBERS 8 The Right to Anonymity (Complainants of Sexual Off ences) “[the authors’] knowledge of this area Silks Jonathan Lennon Kerim Fuad QC Martin McCarthy Chris Henley QC and Monica Stevenson Sally Anne Hales QC James Vine Orlando Pownall QC Under 7 years’ call of law is clearly comprehensive…” Over 7 years’ call Stephen Knight 10 The Sexual Off ences Act, 1967 Mary Aspinall-Miles Emma Stuart-Smith Joanne Cecil David Wood Christina Warner Landlord & Tenant Review Rebecca Herbert ELECTED CBA SUPPORTED BAR COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVES 12 The Brazen-faced Beekeeper Who Fought the Law Paul Mendelle QC Eleanor Mawrey (Equality Noël Sweeney Richard Gibbs Director) Max Hardy Grace Ong James Hines QC Thomas Payne VIEW FROM THE EDITOR Hannah Kinch Daniel Sternberg Nicholas Worsley BAR COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE Tony Cross QC McNaughten CIRCUIT REPRESENTATIVES Tenants’ Right of First Refusal MIDLAND CIRCUIT NORTHERN CIRCUIT EDITOR John Cooper QC Ian Bridge Simon Csoka QC Adrian Reynolds Sarah Griffi n Tom Schofi eld Adrian Farrow riminal law icons crop up in clinical notes from Bethlem depict a NORTH EASTERN CIRCUIT SOUTH EASTERN CIRCUIT C A comprehensive and authoritative guide to all aspects of a residential Ian Goldsack Charles Burton the most unlikely of places and non violent, temperate, shy man who Caroline Goodwin Rosina Cottage QC sometimes it is easy to miss them. never exhibited any outward signs of Claire Larton Phillipa Page tenant’s right of first refusal under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987. Take the series fi nale of ITV’s the “chronic mania and dementia” with WALES AND WESTERN CIRCUIT CHESTER CIRCUIT Kate Lumsdon Victoria a few weeks ago. At about 4pm which he was supposed to be affl icted. Christopher Clee QC Robert Forrest on Friday, January 20, 1843, Prime His counsel, Alexander Cockburn This new edition has been extensively revised and updated and takes on Jonathan Elystan Rees Christopher Quinlan QC Owen Edwards Minister Sir Robert Peel is making QC argued persuasively that his client CO-OPTED MEMBERS Chris Moran his way to Downing Street having just was suff ering from a “partial insanity”, board the latest developments in the field, including important new case-law Francis Fitzgibbon QC Mark Traff ord QC Max Hill QC Michael Turner QC steered the abolition of the Corn Laws allowing for the apparent loss of all such as Artists Court Collective Ltd v Khan (2016). Paul Keleher QC Abimbola Johnson through Parliament. In a dramatic scene self control in respect of one “powerful Media Committee OTHER Joanne Cecil Ex Offi cio Member – at the end of the programme, someone delusion” in an individual who was, in (also an elected member) Chairman fi res a gun at the Prime Minister but all other respects, of sound mind. His Abigail Bright Nigel Lithman QC Product code: TRFR3 Publication date: April 2017 Tom Stevens Ex Offi cio Member – instead of killing him, fatally wounds his “powerful delusion” was argued to be Tom Wainwright Secretary Private Secretary, Edward Drummond. that the Tories were his mortal enemies ISBN: 9781784732677 Price: £90 CPS Liaison Offi cer Emma Nash Peter Wright QC ATC Liaison Offi cer: Th e scene only lasts seconds and the and that “they followed” him wherever Lesley Bates Secretariat only reference to the assassin is when the he went. Many theories still exist about Aaron J Dolan Queen is told that he was a disgruntled the killing of Drummond, including one T: 01304 849 149, [email protected] farmer who felt that the abolition of the propagated by the Drummond family PUBLISHING DETAILS Corn Laws would ruin him.In fact, the only two days after his death that the All submission and editorial inquiries to John Cooper, 25 Bedford Row, London, WC1R 4HD gunman was none other than Daniel wrong man had been arrested. Others [tel] 020 8686 9141 [email] [email protected] McNaughten, who was ultimately found suggest that McNaughten was hired by CRIMINAL BAR QUARTERLY is the Journal of the Criminal Bar Place your order today Association. It is published 4 times a year by LexisNexis on not guilty of murder on the grounds of the Anti Corn Law League and that behalf of the Criminal Bar Association. insanity, and sent to Broadmoor, where the considerable sum of money in his Call: +44 (0)330 161 1234 Magazine Editor: Diana Rose [email] [email protected] [tel 07801 499666] he died two years later. Much has been bank accounts spoke against him being Email: [email protected] For advertising opportunities: written about McNaughten, including a an angry, struggling farmer, but rather a [email] [email protected] fascinating piece in this magazine [Issue paid assassin. Online: www.lexisnexis.co.uk/TRFR17 Printed by Stones Ashford Limited, Ashford, Kent. 3: September 2009, p.9] which brought Such an intriguing and continuing This product comes from sustainable forest sources. The views expressed by CBQ’s contributors or advertisers are into question whether he was really controversy, still cited today, and which not necessarily those of the publishers or the CBA. mad. Proving this sort of thing back fl ashed across our television screens for © CBA ® 2017 in 1843 was diffi cult and “Psychiatry” barely 30 seconds. © istockphoto/bestdesigns © had not yet been established adding to the very speculative nature of any QC, 25 Bedford Chambers. The comments made are not necessarily those of the CBA. Cover image: Cover mental health diagnosis. McNaughten’s RELX (UK) Limited, trading as LexisNexis®. Registered office 1-3 Strand London WC2N 5JR. Registered in England number 2746621. VAT Registered No. GB 730 8595 20. LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are registered trademarks of RELX Inc. © 2017 LexisNexis SA-0517-046. The information in this document is current as of May 2017 and is subject to change without notice. ADD STRAP HERE 4 CHAIR'S COLUMN Summer 2015 - Issue 2 | Criminal Bar Quarterly An Impossible Dream? Chairman's column Angela Raff erty QC 980s pop music is inspiring I hope uniquely challenging and worthwhile threat to the future of the profession. 1you all agree. Before I started on career. It is not known how many of those the path to the Bar I used to strongly However as I looked over the last who leave are from Crime – the identify with the immortal words of 10 years of updates and articles by suspicion is that it is many. Survival Th e Smiths – when“ you want to live, leaders of the Criminal Bar it is clear instinct alone should make us act. how do you start, where do you go. Who to me that the lack of investment in Th e Young Barristers Committee do you need to know?” Succeeding criminal legal aid is coming home annual report reveals that, following at the Bar seemed, sometimes, an to roost. We have faced such savage a survey, it is still the case in 2017 impossible dream. fee cuts in the last 10 years that we that many of the junior Bar have From the outside we looked are still reeling. We may face further done hearings in the magistrate’ court intimidating. With arcane rituals and diffi cult issues with the proposed where they do not expect to be paid fancy dress the Bar seemed of another reform of AGFS this year. Th e system at all. Th e Bar Council’s protocol era. Everyone appeared so confi dent for payment of magistrates’ court and articulate all the time. It cost so fees dates back to 2008 and appears much money to train, to get the fancy The intellectual eff ort, the to be frequently ignored. When fees dress and to live. It was an uphill are paid they are frequently less than struggle for pupillage and everyone emotional intelligence, the protocol requires and delays are kept saying, “don’t do it – you would the hard work and eye endemic.
Recommended publications
  • Human Rights, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in the Commonwealth
    Human Rights, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in The Commonwealth Struggles for Decriminalisation and Change Edited by Corinne Lennox and Matthew Waites Human Rights, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in The Commonwealth: Struggles for Decriminalisation and Change Edited by Corinne Lennox and Matthew Waites © Human Rights Consortium, Institute of Commonwealth Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London, 2013 This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NCND 4.0) license. More information regarding CC licenses is available at https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/ Available to download free at http://www.humanities-digital-library.org ISBN 978-1-912250-13-4 (2018 PDF edition) DOI 10.14296/518.9781912250134 Institute of Commonwealth Studies School of Advanced Study University of London Senate House Malet Street London WC1E 7HU Cover image: Activists at Pride in Entebbe, Uganda, August 2012. Photo © D. David Robinson 2013. Photo originally published in The Advocate (8 August 2012) with approval of Sexual Minorities Uganda (SMUG) and Freedom and Roam Uganda (FARUG). Approval renewed here from SMUG and FARUG, and PRIDE founder Kasha Jacqueline Nabagesera. Published with direct informed consent of the main pictured activist. Contents Abbreviations vii Contributors xi 1 Human rights, sexual orientation and gender identity in the Commonwealth: from history and law to developing activism and transnational dialogues 1 Corinne Lennox and Matthew Waites 2
    [Show full text]
  • Same-Sex Marriage
    Relate policy position June 2014 Evidence suggests that hostile and unsupportive environments can lead to same-sex relationships being more likely to breakdown. Relate welcomes the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 as a positive step towards promoting equality and reducing institutional discrimination towards same-sex couples and their relationships. Relate aims to provide effective and inclusive services supporting same-sex couples at all stages of their relationships. www.relate.org.uk For decades Relate has offered services to same-sex and opposite-sex couples alike. We believe in supporting relationships of all types and promoting good quality, strong and stable relationships. We recognise the importance of equal legal recognition of relationships, and also note the negative impact that discrimination, including institutional discrimination, can have on same-sex couples’ well-being. As such we welcome the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 as a positive step towards promoting equality and reducing institutional discrimination directed towards same-sex couples and their relationships. 1. Relate believes in the importance of good quality, strong and stable relationships for both same-sex and opposite-sex couples alike. The evidence says that what matters most is the quality of relationships, not their legal form. 2. Relate believes that that same-sex couples should be able to have their relationships legally recognised if they choose to. This is important to combat stigma and promote a culture change where same-sex relationships are given equal value (to opposite sex relationships) and support is available for those in same sex relationships. 3. Relate aims to provide effective and inclusive services supporting relationships for every section of the community, including same-sex couples, at all stages of their relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Friday Volume 619 20 January 2017 No. 95 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Friday 20 January 2017 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2017 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 1179 20 JANUARY 2017 1180 House of Commons Merchant Shipping (Homosexual Conduct) Bill Friday 20 January 2017 Second Reading. The House met at half-past Nine o’clock 9.54 am John Glen (Salisbury) (Con): I beg to move, That the PRAYERS Bill be now read a Second time. I am very pleased to bring the Bill to the House because, by repealing sections 146(4) and 147(3) of the [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, it completes the removal of historical provisions that penalised 9.34 am homosexual activity. I am proud to do so because of my commitment to justice and opposition to unjustified Mr David Nuttall (Bury North) (Con): I beg to move, discrimination. That the House sit in private. When it comes to employment, in the merchant navy Question put forthwith (Standing Order No. 163). or anywhere else, what matters is a person’s ability to do The House proceeded to a Division. the job—not their gender, age, ethnicity, religion or sexuality. Hon. Members across the House share that Mr Speaker: Would the Serjeant care to investigate commitment. Manywill be surprised—astonished, even—to the delay in the voting Lobby? learn that this anomaly still remains on the statute book.
    [Show full text]
  • LGBT History Month 2016
    Inner Temple Library LGBT History Month 2016 ‘The overall aim of LGBT History Month is to promote equality and diversity for the benefit of the public. This is done by: increasing the visibility of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (“LGBT”) people, their history, lives and their experiences in the curriculum and culture of educational and other institutions, and the wider community; raising awareness and advancing education on matters affecting the LGBT community; working to make educational and other institutions safe spaces for all LGBT communities; and promoting the welfare of LGBT people, by ensuring that the education system recognises and enables LGBT people to achieve their full potential, so they contribute fully to society and lead fulfilled lives, thus benefiting society as a whole.’ Source: www.lgbthistorymonth.org.uk/about Legal Milestones ‘[A] wallchart has been produced by the Forum for Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Equality in Further and Higher Education and a group of trade unions in association with Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans (LGBT) History Month. The aim has been to produce a resource to support those raising awareness of sexual orientation and gender identity equality and diversity. Centred on the United Kingdom, it highlights important legal milestones and identifies visible and significant contributions made by individuals, groups and particularly the labour movement.’ Source: www.lgbthistorymonth.org.uk/wallchart The wallchart is included in this leaflet, and we have created a timeline of important legal milestones. We have highlighted a selection of material held by the Inner Temple Library that could be used to read about these events in more detail.
    [Show full text]
  • School Diversity Week Toolkit Table of Contents
    School Diversity Week Toolkit Table of Contents Introduction 3 About us 4 Holding an event 7 Ideas Bank 8 Set up a Social Action Team 9 Event Checklist 11 Run a Rainbow Ribbon Campaign 13 Social Media 14 Primary School Lesson Plans 16 Secondary School Lesson Plans 23 Other resources 36 Debates 37 LGBT+ Quiz 38 Famous LGBT+ People 45 LGBT+ Facts 46 Legislative Reforms 47 Primary School Books 48 Secondary School Books 51 Further Reading 54 Spoken Word 54 PSHE Films 55 LGBT+ Films 57 LGBT+ Documentaries 60 Building on School Diversity Week 63 Explaining School Diversity Week 66 Email to Governors 67 Email to Parents/Carers 68 FAQ for Parents/Carers 69 Draft Press Release 71 Introduction We’re absolutely delighted that you’re joining the Just Like Us team across the UK in championing lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans (LGBT+) equality during School Diversity Week 2018. We’ve created this toolkit with help from our Teacher Advisory Group to make celebrating School Diversity Week as easy as possible. It includes: • Easy-to-use ideas for school-wide events celebrating LGBT+ equality • Advice on empowering your students to set up a Social Action Team • KS1-KS4 lesson plans covering LGBT+ issues • Subject specific lesson plans • Extracurricular resources including facts, book lists, articles, films and videos • FAQs to help explain the aims of the week • Letter templates about your school’s involvement for parents, staff and governors This toolkit will help you plan the week to suit your school’s needs. We’ve been inspired to hear about what so many schools already have planned and we’re looking forward to hearing from many more of you over the next few weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • LGBTQIA+ Rights Justnow Timeline Cards Set
    LGBTQIA+ Rights JustNow timeline cards set Created by: Annemarie Kelpe, Friederike Hobein, Sera Ria Gomes The “JustNow – A Toolbox for Teaching Human Rights” project is focused on the development of methodological-didactical materials relating to human rights education, combined with simulation games and diversity learning in non-formal and formal youth educational work. This timeline cards set focuses on teaching about the evolution of the LGBTQIA+ Rights (movement) through history up until today, covering some key milestones, leading figures, events, legislation and organizations. The cards can be used in history or civic education, or in other non-formal education settings. Where possible, it is advised that educators supplement the cards with local (history) examples. The cards were created using images and information researched online, with sources noted on the back of the cards. The cards are created for exclusively non-profit educational purpose and use, in classrooms or non-formal educational settings. Image source: Graphic created by Kayley Weinberg, 2014. https://now.org/blog/now-updates-acronym-lgbtqia/ Additional terms Cis-gender - people who identify with their birth sex and are aligned with gender constructs Transgender - people whose gender identity is different from their gender assigned at birth Queer - umbrella term for sexual and gender minorities and a sexual orientation, intentionally vague which allows different interpretations Intersex - People who are born with any of the several variations in sex characteristics including chromosomes, gonads, sex hormones or genitals that do not fit the typical definitions of male or female bodies Asexual - People, who do not experience sexual attraction to anyone. Asexuality is more of a spectrum.
    [Show full text]
  • 49,000 Men Posthumously Pardoned of Homosexual Crimes in United
    ing males over the males posthumously pardoned on January 49,000 Men Posthumously age of 21 in England 31st. Wilde was convicted in 1895 of gross Pardoned Of Homosexual and Wales in 1967, indecency with a male, and sentenced to in Northern Ireland two years in prison at hard labor. Wilde died Crimes In United Kingdom in 1982 (and in Scot- destitute in Paris in 1900. land in 1980). The he United Kingdom has posthumously age of consent for The buggery pardons also apply to women Tpardoned about 49,000 males who lawful homosexual because it was a non-gender specific crime. were convicted of consensual homosexual activity was reduced However, it isn’t known if any women were activity that is no longer considered crimi- to 18 in 1994. In actually convicted of buggery. nal. The pardons were included in the Polic- Oscar Wilde 2000 it was reduced ing and Crime Act 2017 that received Royal (dailymail.co.uk) to 16 to equalize the The pardons don’t Assent on January 31, 2017. People still age of consent for apply to convictions alive who were convicted of the affected heterosexual and homosexual activity. in Scotland, so the crimes can apply for a pardon. Scottish Parliament The movement for mass pardons arose after will have to sepa- The pardons were for males convicted of homosexual Alan Turing was granted a rately deal with his- two crimes that have been partially decrim- posthumous royal pardon by Queen Eliza- toric homosexual inalized in the United Kingdom (England, beth II in 2013, for his conviction in 1952 related prosecu- Wales and Northern Ireland, with the ex- for gross indecency with a 19-year-old tions.
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Orientation Research Review 2008
    Equality and Human Rights Commission Research report 34 Sexual orientation research review 2008 Martin Mitchell, Charlie Howarth, Mehul Kotecha and Chris Creegan NatCen Sexual orientation research review 2008 Martin Mitchell, Charlie Howarth, Mehul Kotecha and Chris Creegan Equality and Human Rights Commission 2009 First published Autumn 2009 ISBN 978 1 84206 113 8 Equality and Human Rights Commission Research Report Series The Equality and Human Rights Commission Research Report Series publishes research carried out for the Equality and Human Rights Commission (the Commission) by commissioned researchers. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Commission. The Commission is publishing the report as a contribution to discussion and debate. Please contact the Research Team for further information about other Equality and Human Rights Commission’s research reports, or visit our website: Research Team Equality and Human Rights Commission Arndale House The Arndale Centre Manchester M4 3AQ Email: [email protected] Telephone: 0161 829 8500 Website: www.equalityhumanrights.com You can download a copy of this report and the full report as a PDF from our website: www.equalityhumanrights.com 2 CONTENTS TABLES 12 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 13 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS 14 FOREWORD 15 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 19 1 INTRODUCTION 36 1.1 Aims and objectives 36 1.2 Coverage and approach 37 1.3 Context 38 2 MEASURING SEXUAL ORIENTATION – DEFINITIONS AND SIZE 39 2.1 User need for national
    [Show full text]
  • Gay and Lesbian Rights in the United Kingdom: the Story Continued
    GAY AND LESBIAN RIGHTS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM: THE STORY CONTINUED Philip Britton* I. INTRODUCTION It is impossible to be almost equal before the law. Equality is an absolute. It is indivisible and it must be applicable to all.' An earlier article in this Review2 described the legal context in the United Kingdom (specifically, in the law of England and Wales3) within which claims for equality between gay men, lesbians, and the heterosexual majority come to be determined. These claims are broadly similar to those now being made in most Western legal systems-protection for lesbians and gay men against negative or less favorable treatment by reason of their sexual orientation. The article showed how, having neither a written constitution4 nor a catalogue of fundamental rights with special legal status,5 English law at present has no general principle enshrining such protection. Nor are there other relevant rights affirmatively guaranteed by law, like that of privacy, free expression, or of assembly, which would protect the assertion of sexual * LL.B. 1968 University of Southampton, B.C.L. 1970 University of Oxford. Professeur associ6, Facult6 des Sciences Juridiques, Politiques et Sociales, Universit6 de Lille II (France) and Director, Centre of Construction Law and Management, King's College London (e-mail: [email protected]). The author wishes to thank Professor James P. Nehf, Indiana University School of Law-Indianapolis, for continued encouragement in the writing and publishing of this and the earlier article, and Marie-Alice Budniok, Universiti de Lille II, for additional research into French law. 1. Lord Alli, speaking in the House of Lords on April 13, 1999 in the debate on the Sexual Offences (Amendment) Bill, where for the second time a proposal to equalize the age of consent between gay and straight couples was rejected.
    [Show full text]
  • Sodomy Laws and Morality on Both Sides of the Atlantic
    WE ARE ALL PART OF ONE ANOTHER: SODOMY LAWS AND MORALITY ON BOTH SIDES OF THE ATLANTIC INTRODUCTION Sodomy laws which criminalize private consensual gay and lesbian sexual intimacy are the subject of this note. In 1986, nearly half of the states in the United States have sodomy laws on their books, statutes which are being en- forced zealously' since this summer's bitterly anti-gay Supreme Court decision in Bowers v. Hardwick.2 In the United Kingdom, acts of lesbian sexuality were never criminalized,3 but gay male sex was once punishable by death and, until recently, could lead to life imprisonment.* In 1954, the Wolfenden Commit- tee, chaired by Sir John Wolfenden, was appointed to study, inter alia, "the law and practice relating to homosexual offences" 5 and to suggest possible reforms. After three years of study, the Committee issued its recommendation "that homosexual behaviour between consenting adults in private should no longer be a criminal offence."6 Ten years later, after much debate, Parliament enacted this view into law: the Sexual Offenses Act of 1967 decriminalized sodomy in England and Wales.7 Nineteen-eighty Legislation enacted in 1980 included Scotland in the reform,8 and in 1981, the European Court of Human Rights struck down Northern Ireland's sodomy law in the landmark Dudgeon Case.9 Copyright © 1986 by Lisa Bloom 1. See, ag., Missouri v. Walsh, 713 S.W.2d 508 (Mo. 1986) (en band). 2. 106 S. Ct. 2841 (1986). 3. Swept up in the tide of gay-bashing that accompanied the trial and conviction of Oscar Wilde, the British House of Lords attempted to amend the infamous Labouchere Amendment (1885 Criminal Law Amendment Act), which imposed harsh criminal penalties on gay men, to include lesbians.
    [Show full text]
  • BDSM” Are Used Interchangeably; the Latter Two Used As Abbreviations for Ease of Syntax
    1 CHAPTER ONE - INTRODUCTION People must sometimes be protected from themselves.1 On February 8, 1992, the British Guardian carried a story illustrated by a photograph of a man, sitting in his somewhat drab living room. He had a conservative haircut and moustache, reading glasses balanced on his nose, and a very worried look on his face. He had good reason for concern. His partner of twenty years had died of AIDS, he was nursing another friend with the same illness, and he was expecting to be sent to prison. His name was Anthony Brown. Brown was part of a group of homosexual men who met at a private residence to participate in sadomasochistic sex. The activities varied from mild to extreme in nature, but no ‘victim’ had ever required medical treatment, and all had participated consensually, for their own sexual pleasure. The group had, from time to time, taken video footage of their activities – for viewing within the group – and, in 1987, one of these videos fell into the hands of the police Obscene Publications squad. Police believed that they were viewing a snuff movie, that is, a movie in which a person is sexually tortured and then killed. In response, they launched a massive, expensive investigation, codenamed Operation Spanner. Gardens were dug up, looking for bodies. None, of course, were ever found. Criminologist Bill Thompson explains that “despite looking extremely foolish, the police went ahead with a charge of conspiracy to corrupt public morals to get a ‘result’. They 1 Rant J, sentencing a defendant in the Brown case, as reported in the Guardian newspaper, 21 November 1990, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Offences Act 1967
    c i e AT 9 of 1967 SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT 1967 Sexual Offences Act 1967 Index c i e SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT 1967 Index Section Page PART I 7 Offences, and the Prosecution and Punishment of Offences. Intercourse by force, intimidation, etc. 7 1 Rape .................................................................................................................................. 7 2 Procurement of a woman by threats ............................................................................ 7 3 Procurement of woman by false pretences ................................................................. 8 4 Administering drugs to obtain or facilitate intercourse ............................................ 8 Intercourse with girls under sixteen. 8 5 Intercourse with girl under thirteen............................................................................. 8 6 Intercourse with girl under sixteen .............................................................................. 8 Intercourse with defectives 9 7 Intercourse with defective ............................................................................................. 9 8 Procurement of defective ............................................................................................... 9 Incest 9 9 Incest by a man ................................................................................................................ 9 10 Incest by a woman .......................................................................................................... 9 Unnatural offences 10 11 Buggery
    [Show full text]