Alphabet Board of Directors

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Alphabet Board of Directors WMHSMUN XXXIV Alphabet Board of Directors Background Guide “Unprecedented committees. Unparalleled debate. Unmatched fun.” Letters From the Directors Dear Delegates, Hello delegates! My name is Katie Weinsheimer, and I am looking forward to meeting you all on Zoom this fall at WMHSMUN XXXIV. The world of international Internet governance and the moral/ethical issues that arise from the introduction of ‘smart’ technology have been an interest of mine throughout my college career, so I am very excited to delve into these issues as your committee director for the Alphabet Board of Directors. I am a senior international relations major from Silver Spring, MD. I am in the St. Andrews William & Mary Joint Degree Programme, which means I am coming back to W&M after studying abroad in Scotland for two years. I joined William & Mary’s International Relations Club as a freshman after doing model United Nations in high school like all of you. I have loved my time in the club and have loved being involved in all of the conferences the College hosts. I am currently the registration director for our middle school conference, WMIDMUN XIX. Outside of model UN, I love reading, traveling, and cooking/trying new restaurants. But enough about me, you are here for stock market domination! As the Alphabet Board of Directors, you are responsible for the financial health of Alphabet and its subsidiary companies. Directors are charged with assessing and managing the risk associated with Alphabet’s various investments. This committee will take place in November 2020. With COVID-19 raging and poised to worsen in the winter months, the Board will have to make tough decisions about current and future investments. There is a national backlash against “Big Tech” and technological monopolies. Most importantly for the Board, data privacy and security are major concerns for the American people. As the Board examines its current and future assets, Directors would do well to consider the financial, legal, and moral implications of their actions. The success of Alphabet as a company is on the line, but so are individual Directors’ reputations. Directors should work together to advance the interests of the Board but having your own connections and plans would serve you well. If you have any questions, please feel free to email me. Good luck! Katie Weinsheimer [email protected] Background Guide – Alphabet Dear Delegates, Welcome to the Alphabet Board of Directors at our virtual WMHSMUN XXXIV! My name is John Cho, and I look forward to serving as one of your directors. I am a sophomore at William & Mary from Newport News, VA studying Kinesiology and Public Health on the pre-physician assistant track. On campus, I am involved with the Orientation Program, Admissions Office, and Student Assembly. In my free time, you can probably find me napping on the massage chairs in Swem Library, hanging out with friends (socially distant) on the Sunken Gardens, and running on some of the beautiful trails around campus. I attended Model United Nations conferences throughout high school and had amazing and thought-provoking experiences. Though your experience this year will be different, I hope that you will be challenged to think creatively in solving real-world problems and gain meaningful experiences by collaborating with other delegates. Crisis committees are fast paced, shaped by directives from you and your fellow delegates as well as incorporating crisis updates that will change the way you tackle an issue. As a member of the Alphabet Board of Directors and industry magnate in your respective field, you are tasked with weighing a variety of scientific, political, social, and ethical variables to develop solutions. Both tropics rely on you to perform research to help facilitate actions you take. I look forward to meeting you all via Zoom, and please reach out via email for any questions! John Cho [email protected] 2 Background Guide – Alphabet Introduction Alphabet In his annual letter to shareholders announcing the creation of Alphabet, Google founder Larry Page described Alphabet this way: “Alphabet is mostly a collection of companies. The largest of which, of course, is Google. This newer Google is a bit slimmed down, with the companies that are pretty far afield of our main internet products contained in Alphabet instead. What do we mean by far afield? Good examples are our health efforts: Life Sciences (that works on the glucose-sensing contact lens), and Calico (focused on longevity). Fundamentally, we believe this allows us more management scale, as we can run things independently that aren’t very related.”1 Alphabet is a holding company for all of formerly Google’s side projects and now Google itself. Each subsidiary company of Alphabet (like Sidewalk Labs, Nest, and Google X) has its own CEO2, with Google CEO Sundar Pichai acting as the CEO for Alphabet as well.3 Page and Google cofounder Sergy Brin led Alphabet from its creation in 2015 until fall of 2019, when they announced they were handing the reins of the conglomerate to Pichai4 (both are still active board members).5 Two companies may be of particular interest the upcoming Board of Directors meeting: Calico and DeepMind. Calico is a biotechnology company that focuses on the science behind aging. Combining medical professionals with molecular biologists and geneticists, the company wants to develop ways to increase an individual’s life span.6 DeepMind, a UK-based company specializing in artificial intelligence, was bought by Google in 2014. DeepMind aims to develop advanced artificial intelligence (AI) to solve problems in neuroscience, medicine, robotics, language and machine learning.7 In one of the most high- profile cases of AI use to-date, DeepMind created a computer program, AlphaGo, that defeated one of the world’s best Go players. Go, a Chinese board game, involves a complex combination of game moves that requires more than simple mathematical calculations. AlphaGo used historical data from games played by humans and interactive play against itself to learn how to win.8 Board of Directors The Alphabet Board of Directors, as stipulated in the Alphabet Corporate Governance Guidelines, meets regularly throughout the year to (1) oversee management and evaluate strategy; (2) evaluate 3 Background Guide – Alphabet management performance and compensation; (3) review management succession planning; (4) monitor and manage potential conflicts of interest; (5) ensure the integrity of financial information; (6) monitor the effectiveness of Board Governance Practices; and (7) select the Chair and Chief Executive Officer as needed.9 Board members are expected to attend all board meetings prepared with the necessary research and knowledge to make decisions on all matters pertaining to Alphabet’s business and financial strategies. Directors are responsible for acting in the best interests of Alphabet and its stockholders, analyzing current and future risk that may jeopardize the company.10 The Board is meeting at Alphabet headquarters in Mountain View, CA to discuss the company’s Third Quarter earnings and make adjustments for Q4. Of particular interest to the Board is the recent scrutiny around private data collection by AI products. Investors are worried that consumer backlash against data mining may sink Alphabet stock. Another issue the Board has been asked to consider is the use of AI and biotechnology in medical practices. There are ethical implications that could pose a major risk for Alphabet if the technology malfunctioned. Artificial Intelligence (AI) Artificial intelligence (AI) is defined as “the concept used to describe computer systems that are able to learn from their own experiences and solve complex problems in different situations.”11 AI is able to become intelligent because it is fed massive amounts of data, usually personal data, to learn about human behavior. AI has the potential to solve major problems in business, medicine and the environment; however, the power of AI raises many questions with regard to ethics, security and legal responsibility. AI is an example of machine learning. It learns from the data it is given, meaning that it self-updates and avoids the technical barriers that previously limited data analysis. But this feat also requires more and more data to learn from in order for AI to learn.12 Data is gathered from an individual’s actions online - social media accounts, websites, blogs, etc. Then, a machine learning algorithm can use the data it gathered to make analytical decisions without human intervention. The idea of AI (1.) mining people’s data and (2.) making decisions based on that data without human intervention gives pause to many people.13 As AI grows, so does its problem-solving potential, but also its opposition. These moral and legal implications should be front on the minds of board members as they confront this issue within the context of the use of AI in consumer products and medicine. 4 Background Guide – Alphabet Topic 1: Artificial Intelligence Use in Private Data and Consumer Products In 2020, every individual will create 1.7 megabytes per second in personal data, with 97.2% of all businesses investing in technology to use that data for marketing outreach, tailoring messaging, and creating targeted content. After scandals surrounding the sale of personal data, like Cambridge Analytica in 2016, consumers recognize their data is being harvested and are extremely wary of businesses accessing their data. Consumer trust that companies will act ethically
Recommended publications
  • Alphabet Company 2021 Report
    Alphabet Company 2021 Report 22 January 2021 ALPHABET ALPHABET COMPANY COMPANY OVERVIEW Alphabet, Inc. is a holding company, which engages in the business of acquisition and operation of different companies. It operates through the Google and Other Bets segments. The Google segment includes its main Internet products such as ads, Android, Chrome, hardware, Google Cloud, Google Maps, Google Play, Search, and YouTube. The Other Bets segment consists of businesses such as Access, Calico, CapitalG, GV, Verily, Waymo, and X. The company was founded by Lawrence E. Page and Sergey Mikhaylovich Brin on October 2, 2015 and is headquartered in Mountain View, CA. The company currently falls under ‘Mega-Cap’ category with current market capitalization of 1100 B. Market capitalization usually refers to the total value of a company’s stock within the entire market. Google’s namesake search engine and YouTube video service are gateways to the internet for billions of people and have become more essential as they transact and entertain online to avoid the virus. Advertisers have turned to Google’s ad system to let shoppers know about deals and adjusted service offerings as the economy chugs along again. ALPHABET FINANCIALS - Q3 2020 The company beat estimates across the board, following its first-ever revenue decline in Q2. The results showed a strong rebound in its core advertising business, which was hit hard by customer spending pullbacks amid the Covid-19 pandemic. Total revenues of $46.2 billion in the third quarter reflect broad based growth led by an increase in advertiser spend in Search and YouTube as well as continued strength in Google Cloud and Play $46.17 BILLION On the company’s earnings call, CEO Sundar Pichai said, “This year, including this REVENUE quarter, showed how valuable Google’s founding product, search, has been to people.” Pichai said starting next quarter, it will report operating income for its cloud $16.40 business, joining Amazon in giving investors EARNINGS PER SHARE more details.
    [Show full text]
  • Urbanism Under Google: Lessons from Sidewalk Toronto
    Fordham Law Review Volume 88 Issue 2 Article 4 2019 Urbanism Under Google: Lessons from Sidewalk Toronto Ellen P. Goodman Rutgers Law School Julia Powles University of Western Australia Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Law and Society Commons, and the Science and Technology Law Commons Recommended Citation Ellen P. Goodman and Julia Powles, Urbanism Under Google: Lessons from Sidewalk Toronto, 88 Fordham L. Rev. 457 (2019). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol88/iss2/4 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. URBANISM UNDER GOOGLE: LESSONS FROM SIDEWALK TORONTO Ellen P. Goodman* & Julia Powles** Cities around the world are rapidly adopting digital technologies, data analytics, and the trappings of “smart” infrastructure. These innovations are touted as solutions to help rationalize services and address rising urban challenges, whether in housing, transit, energy, law enforcement, health care, waste management, or population flow. Promises of urban innovation unite cities’ need for help with technology firms’ need for markets and are rarely subject to evidentiary burdens about projected benefits (let alone costs). For the city, being smart is about functioning better and attracting tech plaudits. For the technology company, the smart city is a way to capture the value of data flows—either by directly monetizing behavioral insights or by using those insights to design or acquire services—and then realizing the network effects and monopoly rents that have characterized information technology platforms.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
    1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 I. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 2 3 II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE ................................................................................. 8 4 III. PARTIES .................................................................................................................... 9 5 A. Plaintiffs .......................................................................................................... 9 6 B. Defendants ....................................................................................................... 9 7 IV. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS ................................................................................... 17 8 A. Alphabet’s Reputation as a “Good” Company is Key to Recruiting Valuable Employees and Collecting the User Data that Powers Its 9 Products ......................................................................................................... 17 10 B. Defendants Breached their Fiduciary Duties by Protecting and Rewarding Male Harassers ............................................................................ 19 11 1. The Board Has Allowed a Culture Hostile to Women to Fester 12 for Years ............................................................................................. 19 13 a) Sex Discrimination in Pay and Promotions: ........................... 20 14 b) Sex Stereotyping and Sexual Harassment: .............................. 23 15 2. The New York Times Reveals the Board’s Pattern
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement
    Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway Mountain View, California 94043 (650) 253-0000 zz DEAR STOCKHOLDERS We are pleased to invite you to participate in our 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (Annual Meeting) to be held on Wednesday, June 2, 2021 at 9:00 a.m., Pacific Time. We have adopted a virtual format for our Annual Meeting to provide a consistent experience to all stockholders regardless of location. Alphabet stockholders of Class A or Class B common stock (or their proxy holders) as of the close of business on the record date, April 6, 2021 (Record Date), can participate in and vote at our Annual Meeting by visiting www. virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GOOGL21 and entering the 16-digit control number included in your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (Notice), voting instruction form, or proxy card. All others may view the Annual Meeting through our Investor Relations YouTube channel at www.youtube.com/c/AlphabetIR. Further details regarding participation in the Annual Meeting and the business to be conducted are described in the Notice you received in the mail and in this proxy statement. We have also made available a copy of our 2020 Annual Report to Stockholders (Annual Report) with this proxy statement. We encourage you to read our Annual Report. It includes our audited financial statements and provides information about our business. We have elected to provide access to our proxy materials over the Internet under the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s “notice and access” rules. We are constantly focused on improving the ways people connect with information, and believe that providing our proxy materials over the Internet increases the ability of our stockholders to connect with the information they need, while reducing the environmental impact of our Annual Meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • NEUBERGER BERMAN ALTERNATIVE FUNDS Form N-PX
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM N-PX Annual report of proxy voting record of registered management investment companies filed on Form N-PX Filing Date: 2017-08-24 | Period of Report: 2017-06-30 SEC Accession No. 0000898432-17-000842 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) FILER NEUBERGER BERMAN ALTERNATIVE FUNDS Mailing Address Business Address 1290 AVENUE OF THE 1290 AVENUE OF THE CIK:1317474| IRS No.: 000000000 | State of Incorp.:DE | Fiscal Year End: 1031 AMERICAS AMERICAS Type: N-PX | Act: 40 | File No.: 811-21715 | Film No.: 171048680 NEW YORK NY 10104 NEW YORK NY 10104 (212) 476-8800 Copyright © 2017 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 24, 2017 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM N-PX Annual Report of Proxy Voting Record of Registered Management Investment Company Investment Company Act file number: 811-21715 NEUBERGER BERMAN ALTERNATIVE FUNDS (Exact Name of the Registrant as Specified in Charter) c/o Neuberger Berman Investment Advisers LLC 1290 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10104-0002 (Address of Principal Executive Offices – Zip Code) Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (212) 476-8800 Robert Conti Chief Executive Officer and President Neuberger Berman Alternative Funds c/o Neuberger Berman Investment Advisers LLC 1290 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10104-0002 Arthur C. Delibert, Esq. K&L Gates LLP 1601 K Street, N.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Contains Forward-Looking Statements Within the Meaning of the Federal Secu
    This Annual Report (including the Founders’ DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS STOCKHOLDER INFORMATION Letter) contains forward-looking statements Directors For further information about Google, within the meaning of the federal securities contact: laws. These forward-looking statements Eric Schmidt Chairman of the Board & Investor Relations include, but are not limited to, statements Chief Executive Officer Google Inc. related to improvements to our search Google Inc. 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway engine, advertising systems, and products Mountain View, California 94043 Sergey Brin [email protected] and services. These forward-looking Co-Founder & President, Technology statements are based on current expectations, Google Inc. You may also visit us by visiting the forecasts, and assumptions and involve a investor relations portion of our website at: Larry Page http://investor.google.com number of risks and uncertainties that could Co-Founder & President, Products cause actual results to differ materially from Google Inc. If you wish to receive stockholder those anticipated by these forward-looking information online, you can register at: L. John Doerr http://investor.google.com/notify.html statements. Such risks and uncertainties General Partner include a variety of factors, some of which Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers Google’s stock trades on the NASDAQ are beyond our control. In particular, such Global Select Market under the ticker John L. Hennessy symbol GOOG. risks and uncertainties include our ability President, Stanford University to innovate and many risks relating to Transfer Agent and Registrar successful development and marketing of Ann Mather Computershare Trust Company, N.A. Former Executive Vice President & P.O. Box 43078 technology, products, and operating systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Analysis of Netflix, Inc
    University of Mississippi eGrove Honors College (Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors Theses Honors College) Spring 5-1-2021 Complete Analysis of Netflix, Inc. Anna Gregory Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/hon_thesis Part of the Corporate Finance Commons Recommended Citation Gregory, Anna, "Complete Analysis of Netflix, Inc." (2021). Honors Theses. 1765. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/hon_thesis/1765 This Undergraduate Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College (Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors College) at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMPLETE ANALYSIS OF NETFLIX, INC. By Anna Kathryn Gregory A thesis submitted to the faculty of The University of Mississippi in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors College. Oxford, MS April 2021 Approved By ______________________________ Advisor: Professor Bonnie Van Ness ______________________________ Reader: Professor Lin Ge ______________________________ Reader: Professor Mark Walker 2 © 2020 Anna Kathryn Gregory ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to everyone who has encouraged and motivated me throughout this process. To my parents, Bert and Angel Gregory, thank you for pushing me and believing in me. To my fiancé, Trevor Buse, thank you for believing in me and supporting through the hard times. I could not have made it through this process without all of the love and support that you each provide! iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thank you to Dr. Bonnie Van Ness for being my advisor throughout this process and for helping me find a topic I am passionate about.
    [Show full text]
  • Netflix Ecosystem Phone: (408) 540-3700
    Netflix 100 Winchester Circle Los Gatos, CA 95032 Netflix Ecosystem Phone: (408) 540-3700 www.netflix.com Outside Relationships (a California Corporation) Outside Relationships Netflix Securities Regulation Regulators Capital Suppliers Customers and Stock Exchange Customers Suppliers Capital Regulators Debt Structure Equity Structure Listing Rules Public Debt Bond Financing Holders Debt ( $16.31 Billion as of December 31, 2020) | Credit Ratings: S&P (BB+), Moody’s (Ba3) Equity Securities Common Stock Regulators $750 Million Revolving Credit Facility (Matures 2024) 2021 Senior Notes ($500 Million) 2025 Senior Notes ($800 Million) 2027 Senior Notes ($1.588 Billion) Common Stock Repurchase Plan Preferred Stock Common Stock Repurchases Significant Authorized: $5 Billion Authorized: 10,000,000 Authorized: 4,990,000,000 Shareholders Deposit Accounts with Black-Owned Financial Institutions 2022 Senior Notes ($700 Million) 2025 Senior Notes ($500 Million) 2028 Senior Notes ($1.600 Billion) US Securities Balance Available: $5 Billion Issued: None Issued: 442,895,261 Revolving Credit Financing Equity Capital and Exchange Commercial Black Economic Development Initiative Hope Credit Union 2024 Senior Notes ($400 Million) 2026 Senior Notes ($1.00 Billion) 2028 Senior Notes ($1.900 Billion) Expiration: None Record Holders: None Record Holders: 1,977 The Vanguard Commission Banks (Lead Group, Inc. Subjects of Bank: Goldman Communication (7.06%) General Sachs, JPMorgan Equipment and Corporate Functions Product Content Professional The NASDAQ Business
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D: Profitability of Google and Facebook
    Appendix D: Profitability of Google and Facebook Introduction 1. As part of the market study, we have undertaken an analysis into the financial performance of Alphabet Group (Google) and Facebook (this includes Instagram, WhatsApp and Messenger). 2. We have undertaken financial analysis for both platforms to enable us to establish whether the platforms are generating returns persistently higher than if they were operating in a more competitive market. 3. We have undertaken analysis of the following elements of financial performance for Google and Facebook: • the overall financial performance, including a review of profits, return on capital, and certain other measures reflecting trends in monetisation; and • the returns earned relative to benchmarks, including the relationship between their returns on investment and their cost of capital. Alphabet Group Financial performance of the Group 4. In assessing Google’s financial performance, we have started with Google’s group financial statements. In October 2015, Google established a new parent company, Alphabet Inc. Alphabet splits its reported performance into two operating segments for US financial reporting purposes: • Google; and • Other Bets. 5. Our market study is interested in the performance of businesses within the Google segment, and this appendix seeks to understand the level of profitability of the search business, in particular. The businesses most relevant to our study form the great majority of the Google segment by revenue including search, YouTube, Maps, Android, digital advertising, Chrome and Google Play. Many of the ‘business units’ in the Google segment are not directly monetised. Brands such as Android, Chrome and Gmail are monetised largely through their role in developing what is often referred to as an ‘ecosystem’ within which Google is the default search provider, allowing Google to monetise these activities through digital advertising.
    [Show full text]
  • Data and the Future of Work
    DFW Data and the Future of Work Hettie O’Brien & Mathew Lawrence July 2020 1 —Jul —Jul 20 1. Introduction When a new decade began a few short months ago, few suspected the world would look like this. The coronavirus pandemic is bewildering because it turns on a paradox. Helping others could be deadly; doing nothing can be the best way to do something; apocalyptic events, it turns out, can feel crushingly monotonous. But not everything has changed. One of the most unwelcome continuities from the world we’re leaving behind us is the relentless growth of platform giants and the app-driven future they have sold us under the guise of heightened convenience. As small businesses went bankrupt and workers were laid off, Amazon announced it was hiring an additional 100,000 workers, its founder on course to become the world’s first trillionaire.[1][2] Tesla defied state laws to put its factory back into production while a deadly virus crept across North America.[3] Palantir partnered with NHSX to create a store of aggregated patient data that is likely to outlive the pandemic. [4] These companies appear not just immune to the virus, but strengthened by it. Data and the Future of the Work and the Future Data A state of exception can quickly become the state of play. In a recent report for the Intercept, Naomi Klein described how, rather than seeing our altered reality of physical isolation as an unfortunate but necessary protection against further deaths, tech companies are treating it as a “living laboratory for a permanent – and highly profitable – no-touch future.”[5] This future is one in which our living rooms, already turned into our offices, become our gyms, our GP surgeries, our schools, our therapist couches; where medicine, teaching and exercise instruction are conducted remotely.
    [Show full text]
  • DSAP Supplemental Report on the Sidewalk Labs Digital Innovation Appendix (DIA)
    DSAP Supplemental Report on the Sidewalk Labs Digital Innovation Appendix (DIA) Author: Waterfront Toronto’s Digital Strategy Advisory Panel Provided to Waterfront Toronto: February 17, 2020 Published: February 26, 2020 Summary In August 2019, Waterfront Toronto’s Digital Strategy Advisory Panel (DSAP) set out in a Preliminary Commentary its initial impressions, comments and questions on Sidewalk Labs’ Master Innovation Development Plan (MIDP). Since then, significantly more information has been made public about the Quayside project, including a Digital Innovation Appendix (DIA) and the October 31 Threshold Issues Resolution letter. This Report is supplemental to the Preliminary Commentary, identifying areas in which the additional information has addressed (in whole or in part) concerns raised and areas in which questions or concerns remain. Panelists have also taken the opportunity to provide input into other matters relevant to their expertise, including considerations related to digital governance and to Sidewalk Labs as an innovation and funding partner. Comments include, but are not limited to: ● Overall impressions of the DIA: Overall, Panelists were generally in agreement that the DIA was a significant improvement over the MIDP and appreciated the amount of information provided in a more streamlined format. However, concerns remain - notably, that certain critical details are still outstanding. ● Digital Governance: While Panelists support the outcome of the October 31 Threshold Issues resolution, which reaffirmed that digital governance belongs exclusively in the purview of Waterfront Toronto and its government partners, the most significant outstanding issues for Panelists was generally the DSAP Supplemental Report 2 lack of a fully realized digital governance framework and the need for expedited public sector leadership.
    [Show full text]
  • Bi-Weekly Finanial Technology Sector Report
    Financial Technology Sector Summary Week of May 8, 2017 1 DEAL DASHBOARD Financial Technology (3) (1) (3) $11.7 Bn | 1,179 Deals Industry Stock Market Performance $347.2 Bn | 3,159 Deals LTM Financing Volume Last Twelve Months LTM M&A Volume 160 Select Recent Financing Transactions Select Recent M&A Transactions Company Amount ($MM) 150 Target Acquirer EV ($MM) 140 $110.0 $675.0 130 $70.0 $30.0 120 $56.0 110 NA 100 $54.0 NA 90 $50.0 NA 80 5/5/16 6/20/16 8/3/16 9/16/16 11/1/16 12/15/16 1/30/17 3/15/17 4/28/17 $32.0 NA Aicai Payments Exchanges Financial Data, Content, Information Processors / $17.5 & Analytics Credit Bureaus NA Banking & Lending Online Broker Dealers Technology $15.7 NA Investment Services, Healthcare / Insurance Software, & Technology Technology S&P 500 (3) (3) Quarterly Financing Volume Quarterly M&A Volume $10 500 $120 876 1000 818 783 750 $8 $8.9 400 $100 800 $99.4 299 298 316 $97.8 276 $80 $6 300 $83.1 $81.6 600 $60 $4 200 400 $40 $3.0 $2 $2.6 $2.6 100 $20 200 $0 0 $0 0 Q2 2016 Q3 2016 Q4 2016 Q1 2017 Q2 2016 Q3 2016 Q4 2016 Q1 2017 Financing Volume ($Bn) Financing Deal Count M&A Volume ($Bn) M&A Deal Count Notes: Source: Capital IQ, CB Insights and GCA FinTech Database. Market Data as of 5/5/17. 1) Refer to footnotes on page 5 for index composition.
    [Show full text]