DOCSLIB.ORG

Amended Complaint

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

19CV341522 Santa Clara – Civil Electronically Filed 1 OTTINI OTTINI INC B & B , . by Superior Court of CA, FrancisA.Bottini,Jr.(SBN175783) County of Santa Clara, 2 AlbertY.Chang(SBN296065) on 8/16/2019 3:18 PM YuryA.Kolesnikov(SBN271173) 3 Reviewed By: R. Walker 7817IvanhoeAvenue,Suite102 Case #19CV341522 LaJolla,California92037 4 Envelope: 3274669 Telephone:(858)914-2001 5 Facsimile:(858)914-2002 Email:[email protected] 6 [email protected] [email protected] 7 8 COHENMILSTEINSELLERS&TOLLPLLC JulieGoldsmithReiser( ) 9 MollyBowen( ) 1100NewYorkAvenue,N.W.,Suite500 10 Washington,D.C.20005 11 Telephone:(202)408-4600 Facsimile:(202)408-4699 12 Email:[email protected] [email protected] 13 14 15 [AdditionalCounselonSignaturePage] 16 SUPERIORCOURTOFTHESTATEOFCALIFORNIA INANDFORTHECOUNTYOFSANTACLARA 17 18 INREALPHABETINC.SHAREHOLDER LeadCaseNo.19CV341522 19 DERIVATIVELITIGATION 20 CONSOLIDATED 21 STOCKHOLDERDERIVATIVE ThisDocumentRelatesto: COMPLAINTFOR: 22 DEMANDFUTILITYACTION (1)BREACHOFFIDUCIARYDUTY; 23 (2)UNJUSTENRICHMENT; (3)CORPORATEWASTE;and 24 (4)ABUSEOFCONTROL 25 JURYTRIALDEMANDED 26 27 PUBLIC-REDACTSMATERIALSFROMCONDITIONALLYSEALEDRECORD 28 CONSOLIDATEDSTOCKHOLDERDERIVATIVECOMPLAINT 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 I. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 2 3 II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE ............................................................................... 11 4 III. PARTIES .................................................................................................................. 11 5 A. Lead Plaintiffs ............................................................................................... 11 6 B. Defendants ..................................................................................................... 13 7 C. Doe Defendants ............................................................................................. 22 8 IV. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS ................................................................................... 23 9 A. Alphabet’s Reputation as a “Good” Company is Key to Recruiting Valuable Employees and Collecting the User Data that Powers Its 10 Products ......................................................................................................... 23 11 B. Defendants Breached their Fiduciary Duties by Protecting and Rewarding Male Harassers ............................................................................ 25 12 1. Defendants Brin and Page, the Company’s Co-Founders, as 13 Well as Other Senior Executives, Set the Tone at the Top by Dating Female Subordinates .............................................................. 25 14 C. The Individual Defendants Tolerated Persistent Misconduct from 15 Andy Rubin Throughout His Tenure at Google ............................................ 28 16 1. Following the example of other senior leadership at the Company, Rubin had extramarital relationships with female 17 employees, culminating in an allegation of sexual harassment. ........ 31 18 2. The Board Pays Rubin an Excessive Severance Package Despite Finding Sexual Harassment Allegations against him 19 were Credible. .................................................................................... 31 20 3. Defendants’ Culture of Concealment Continued Even After a News Report Surfaced That Suggested Impropriety by Rubin .......... 35 21 4. The Board of Directors’ and Other Defendants’ Active, Direct, 22 and Intentional Role in the Wrongful Conduct Surrounding Rubin’s Departure .............................................................................. 36 23 D. Google Paid Another Executive, Amit Singhal, Millions After He 24 Sexually Harassed Google Employees .......................................................... 38 25 E. Google Asked Other Victims of Sexual Harassment to “Stay Quiet” After Their Allegations of Harassment Were Found to Be Credible 26 and May have Paid Off Other Executives ..................................................... 40 27 F. The Rubin and Singhal Scandals Epitomize the Hostile Workplace Environment that the Alphabet Board has allowed to Fester for years. ........ 42 28 -i- CONSOLIDATED STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT 1 1. Alphabet’s Pervasive Sex Stereotyping and Sexual Harassment ....... 43 2 2. Alphabet’s Systemic Sex Discrimination in Pay and Promotions .......................................................................................... 45 3 G. Alphabet Employees and Shareholders Express Outrage at the 4 Board’s Protection of Male Executives ......................................................... 49 5 H. Defendants Breached their Fiduciary Duties by Hiding the Google+ Breach from the Public .................................................................................. 55 6 1. Alphabet’s History of Concealing Data Privacy Issues Had 7 Already Resulted in Heightened Legal Scrutiny and Penalties ......... 56 8 2. The WSJ reveals Defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company and their legal obligations by knowingly 9 concealing the Google+ breach to avoid regulatory scrutiny............. 57 10 3. Lawmakers Investigate Whether Alphabet’s Concealment Violates the FTC Consent Decree or Other Data Protection 11 Laws ................................................................................................... 61 12 I. Defendant Schmidt Leaves the Board ........................................................... 64 13 V. THE INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS BREACHED THEIR FIDUCIARY DUTIES .................................................................................................................... 65 14 A. The Individual Defendants Breached Their Fiduciary Duties to the 15 Company ........................................................................................................ 66 16 B. The Individual Defendants Breached their Duty of Good Faith ................... 66 17 C. The Individual Defendants Violated Google’s Corporate Governance Guidelines ...................................................................................................... 68 18 D. The Individual Defendants Violated Google’s Code of Conduct by 19 Permitting the Company to Engage in Unlawful Acts .................................. 69 20 E. The Audit Committee Defendants Breached the Duties Imposed by the Audit Committee Charter by Permitting Alphabet to Engage in 21 Conduct in Violation of the Law ................................................................... 70 22 F. The Leadership Development and Compensation Committee Defendants Breached the Duties Imposed by the Leadership 23 Development and Compensation Committee Charter by Approving Severance Payouts to Executives Who Should Have Been Terminated 24 for Cause ........................................................................................................ 71 25 G. The Governance Committee Defendants Breached the Duties Imposed by the Governance Committee Charter ......................................................... 72 26 H. The Director Defendants Caused Google to File Misleading Financial 27 Statements With the SEC .............................................................................. 74 28 I. Conspiracy, Aiding and Abetting, and Concerted Action ............................. 78 -ii- CONSOLIDATED STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT 1 VI. DAMAGES TO THE COMPANY .......................................................................... 79 2 A. Damages From the Unlawful Severance Payments to Rubin and Singhal ........................................................................................................... 79 3 B. Costs to Defend the Securities Fraud Class Action Lawsuit ......................... 80 4 C. Sexual Harassment, Discrimination, and Retaliation .................................... 80 5 D. Data Privacy .................................................................................................. 81 6 E. Legal and Regulatory Penalties ..................................................................... 82 7 F. Reputation, Goodwill, and Workplace Harm ................................................ 82 8 VII. DERIVATIVE ALLEGATIONS ............................................................................. 84 9 VIII. DEMAND FUTILITY ALLEGATIONS ................................................................. 85 10 A. Demand is Excused Because Each Member of the Board Faces a 11 Substantial Likelihood of Liability ................................................................ 85 12 B. Demand is Futile Because a Majority of the Board Completely Abdicated Its Fiduciary Duties ...................................................................... 89 13 C. Demand is Excused Because a Majority of the Board is Not 14 Independent ................................................................................................... 90 15 D. Demand is Excused Because the Board is Entirely Controlled by Defendants Page and Brin ............................................................................. 97 16 IX. THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS DOES NOT BAR LEAD 17 PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, WAS TOLLED .................. 101 18 FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION ............................................................................................ 101 19 SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION ....................................................................................... 103 20 THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION ..........................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Android (Operating System) 1 Android (Operating System)

    Android (Operating System) 1 Android (Operating System)

    Android (operating system) 1 Android (operating system) Android Home screen displayed by Samsung Nexus S with Google running Android 2.3 "Gingerbread" Company / developer Google Inc., Open Handset Alliance [1] Programmed in C (core), C++ (some third-party libraries), Java (UI) Working state Current [2] Source model Free and open source software (3.0 is currently in closed development) Initial release 21 October 2008 Latest stable release Tablets: [3] 3.0.1 (Honeycomb) Phones: [3] 2.3.3 (Gingerbread) / 24 February 2011 [4] Supported platforms ARM, MIPS, Power, x86 Kernel type Monolithic, modified Linux kernel Default user interface Graphical [5] License Apache 2.0, Linux kernel patches are under GPL v2 Official website [www.android.com www.android.com] Android is a software stack for mobile devices that includes an operating system, middleware and key applications.[6] [7] Google Inc. purchased the initial developer of the software, Android Inc., in 2005.[8] Android's mobile operating system is based on a modified version of the Linux kernel. Google and other members of the Open Handset Alliance collaborated on Android's development and release.[9] [10] The Android Open Source Project (AOSP) is tasked with the maintenance and further development of Android.[11] The Android operating system is the world's best-selling Smartphone platform.[12] [13] Android has a large community of developers writing applications ("apps") that extend the functionality of the devices. There are currently over 150,000 apps available for Android.[14] [15] Android Market is the online app store run by Google, though apps can also be downloaded from third-party sites.
  • Incorporating Authentic Video Into Language-Learning Mobile Applications

    Incorporating Authentic Video Into Language-Learning Mobile Applications

    Incorporating Authentic Video into Language-learning Mobile Applications Andrew Watabe A project submitted to the faculty of Brigham Young University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts J. Paul Warnick, Chair Rob Alan Martinsen Rob Reynolds Center for Language Studies Brigham Young University Copyright © 2021 Andrew Watabe All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT Incorporating Authentic Video into Language-learning Mobile Applications Andrew Watabe Center for Language Studies, BYU Master of Arts Authentic content in language materials can provide learners with meaningful contexts that enhance language learning (Shrum & Glisan, 2016). This project seeks to create a Japanese- learning iOS app that teaches language directly from authentic Japanese YouTube videos. The app provides a video library where users can find videos on a variety of topics such as food, music, beauty, and games. Each video features video captions, vocabulary exercises, and grammar drills based on the language used in the video. Students enrolled in Japanese classes at Brigham Young University were asked to test out the app and provide feedback on their experience. The participants enjoyed the authentic content and found the written transcripts of the videos to be helpful to their learning. They also requested additional content and features to improve the app. Based on the participants’ comments, we created a plan of action including future updates for the app. Keywords: CALL, authentic texts, Japanese, scaffolding, mobile apps, YouTube
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

    1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 I. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 2 3 II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE ................................................................................. 8 4 III. PARTIES .................................................................................................................... 9 5 A. Plaintiffs .......................................................................................................... 9 6 B. Defendants ....................................................................................................... 9 7 IV. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS ................................................................................... 17 8 A. Alphabet’s Reputation as a “Good” Company is Key to Recruiting Valuable Employees and Collecting the User Data that Powers Its 9 Products ......................................................................................................... 17 10 B. Defendants Breached their Fiduciary Duties by Protecting and Rewarding Male Harassers ............................................................................ 19 11 1. The Board Has Allowed a Culture Hostile to Women to Fester 12 for Years ............................................................................................. 19 13 a) Sex Discrimination in Pay and Promotions: ........................... 20 14 b) Sex Stereotyping and Sexual Harassment: .............................. 23 15 2. The New York Times Reveals the Board’s Pattern
  • History and Evolution of the Android OS

    History and Evolution of the Android OS

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Springer - Publisher Connector CHAPTER 1 History and Evolution of the Android OS I’m going to destroy Android, because it’s a stolen product. I’m willing to go thermonuclear war on this. —Steve Jobs, Apple Inc. Android, Inc. started with a clear mission by its creators. According to Andy Rubin, one of Android’s founders, Android Inc. was to develop “smarter mobile devices that are more aware of its owner’s location and preferences.” Rubin further stated, “If people are smart, that information starts getting aggregated into consumer products.” The year was 2003 and the location was Palo Alto, California. This was the year Android was born. While Android, Inc. started operations secretly, today the entire world knows about Android. It is no secret that Android is an operating system (OS) for modern day smartphones, tablets, and soon-to-be laptops, but what exactly does that mean? What did Android used to look like? How has it gotten where it is today? All of these questions and more will be answered in this brief chapter. Origins Android first appeared on the technology radar in 2005 when Google, the multibillion- dollar technology company, purchased Android, Inc. At the time, not much was known about Android and what Google intended on doing with it. Information was sparse until 2007, when Google announced the world’s first truly open platform for mobile devices. The First Distribution of Android On November 5, 2007, a press release from the Open Handset Alliance set the stage for the future of the Android platform.
  • Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement

    Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement

    Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway Mountain View, California 94043 (650) 253-0000 zz DEAR STOCKHOLDERS We are pleased to invite you to participate in our 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (Annual Meeting) to be held on Wednesday, June 2, 2021 at 9:00 a.m., Pacific Time. We have adopted a virtual format for our Annual Meeting to provide a consistent experience to all stockholders regardless of location. Alphabet stockholders of Class A or Class B common stock (or their proxy holders) as of the close of business on the record date, April 6, 2021 (Record Date), can participate in and vote at our Annual Meeting by visiting www. virtualshareholdermeeting.com/GOOGL21 and entering the 16-digit control number included in your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (Notice), voting instruction form, or proxy card. All others may view the Annual Meeting through our Investor Relations YouTube channel at www.youtube.com/c/AlphabetIR. Further details regarding participation in the Annual Meeting and the business to be conducted are described in the Notice you received in the mail and in this proxy statement. We have also made available a copy of our 2020 Annual Report to Stockholders (Annual Report) with this proxy statement. We encourage you to read our Annual Report. It includes our audited financial statements and provides information about our business. We have elected to provide access to our proxy materials over the Internet under the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s “notice and access” rules. We are constantly focused on improving the ways people connect with information, and believe that providing our proxy materials over the Internet increases the ability of our stockholders to connect with the information they need, while reducing the environmental impact of our Annual Meeting.
  • NEUBERGER BERMAN ALTERNATIVE FUNDS Form N-PX

    NEUBERGER BERMAN ALTERNATIVE FUNDS Form N-PX

    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM N-PX Annual report of proxy voting record of registered management investment companies filed on Form N-PX Filing Date: 2017-08-24 | Period of Report: 2017-06-30 SEC Accession No. 0000898432-17-000842 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) FILER NEUBERGER BERMAN ALTERNATIVE FUNDS Mailing Address Business Address 1290 AVENUE OF THE 1290 AVENUE OF THE CIK:1317474| IRS No.: 000000000 | State of Incorp.:DE | Fiscal Year End: 1031 AMERICAS AMERICAS Type: N-PX | Act: 40 | File No.: 811-21715 | Film No.: 171048680 NEW YORK NY 10104 NEW YORK NY 10104 (212) 476-8800 Copyright © 2017 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 24, 2017 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM N-PX Annual Report of Proxy Voting Record of Registered Management Investment Company Investment Company Act file number: 811-21715 NEUBERGER BERMAN ALTERNATIVE FUNDS (Exact Name of the Registrant as Specified in Charter) c/o Neuberger Berman Investment Advisers LLC 1290 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10104-0002 (Address of Principal Executive Offices – Zip Code) Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (212) 476-8800 Robert Conti Chief Executive Officer and President Neuberger Berman Alternative Funds c/o Neuberger Berman Investment Advisers LLC 1290 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10104-0002 Arthur C. Delibert, Esq. K&L Gates LLP 1601 K Street, N.W.
  • Essential Phone on Its Way to Early Adopters 24 August 2017, by Seung Lee, the Mercury News

    Essential Phone on Its Way to Early Adopters 24 August 2017, by Seung Lee, the Mercury News

    Essential Phone on its way to early adopters 24 August 2017, by Seung Lee, The Mercury News this week in a press briefing in Essential's headquarters in Palo Alto. "People have neglected hardware for years, decades. The rest of the venture business is focused on software, on service." Essential wanted to make a timeless, high-powered phone, according to Rubin. Its bezel-less and logo- less design is reinforced by titanium parts, stronger than the industry standard aluminum parts, and a ceramic exterior. It has no buttons in its front display but has a fingerprint scanner on the back. The company is also making accessories, like an attachable 360-degree camera, and the Phone will work with products from its competition, such as the Apple Homekit. Essential, the new smartphone company founded by Android operating system creator Andy Rubin, "How do you build technology that consumers are is planning to ship its first pre-ordered flagship willing to invest in?" asked Rubin. "Inter-operability smartphones soon. The general launch date for is really, really important. We acknowledge that, the Essential Phone remains unknown, despite and we inter-operate with companies even if they months of publicity and continued intrigue among are our competitors." Silicon Valley's gadget-loving circles. Recently, Essential's exclusive carrier Sprint announced it While the 5.7-inch phone feels denser than its will open Phone pre-orders on its own website and Apple and Samsung counterparts, it is bereft of stores. Essential opened up pre-orders on its bloatware - rarely used default apps that are website in May when the product was first common in new smartphones.
  • Weekly Wireless Report August 18, 2017

    Weekly Wireless Report August 18, 2017

    Week Ending: Weekly Wireless Report August 18, 2017 This Week’s Stories Apple Is On The Hunt For Original TV Shows Inside This Issue: August 16, 2017 This Week’s Stories Apple is finally getting serious about original TV programming. Apple Is On The Hunt For Original TV Shows Two Apple executives have been meeting with Hollywood agents and producers to hear pitches about possible shows for Apple to buy, according to two producers who have met with them. Facebook Is Building A New $750 Million Data Center In Ohio The execs, Jamie Erlicht and Zack Van Amburg, were hired from Sony Pictures Television in June to oversee Apple's video programming. Products & Services New Apple, Samsung These pitch meetings have placed Apple in direct competition with Netflix, HBO and other Smartphone Challenger Is Finally distributors. Available For Pre-Order Some producers are eager to work with Apple, sensing a first-mover advantage. Others have a lot of YouTube TV Now Available To questions about how Apple will distribute its shows. When "House of Cards" debuted on Netflix, 50% Of U.S. Households marking the streaming service's entrance into original programming, the service already had a large catalog of licensed programming. Apple, Aetna Hold Secret Meetings To Bring Apple Watch To Millions Of Aetna Customers Apple doesn't have that -- but it does have iPhones in hundreds of millions of hands. Emerging Technology The meetings were first reported by The Wall Street Journal on Wednesday. Apple is said to be AI Is Taking Over The Cloud budgeting about $1 billion to acquire and produce original TV shows over the next year, according to the Journal.
  • Contains Forward-Looking Statements Within the Meaning of the Federal Secu

    Contains Forward-Looking Statements Within the Meaning of the Federal Secu

    This Annual Report (including the Founders’ DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS STOCKHOLDER INFORMATION Letter) contains forward-looking statements Directors For further information about Google, within the meaning of the federal securities contact: laws. These forward-looking statements Eric Schmidt Chairman of the Board & Investor Relations include, but are not limited to, statements Chief Executive Officer Google Inc. related to improvements to our search Google Inc. 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway engine, advertising systems, and products Mountain View, California 94043 Sergey Brin [email protected] and services. These forward-looking Co-Founder & President, Technology statements are based on current expectations, Google Inc. You may also visit us by visiting the forecasts, and assumptions and involve a investor relations portion of our website at: Larry Page http://investor.google.com number of risks and uncertainties that could Co-Founder & President, Products cause actual results to differ materially from Google Inc. If you wish to receive stockholder those anticipated by these forward-looking information online, you can register at: L. John Doerr http://investor.google.com/notify.html statements. Such risks and uncertainties General Partner include a variety of factors, some of which Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers Google’s stock trades on the NASDAQ are beyond our control. In particular, such Global Select Market under the ticker John L. Hennessy symbol GOOG. risks and uncertainties include our ability President, Stanford University to innovate and many risks relating to Transfer Agent and Registrar successful development and marketing of Ann Mather Computershare Trust Company, N.A. Former Executive Vice President & P.O. Box 43078 technology, products, and operating systems.
  • Should Google Be Taken at Its Word?

    Should Google Be Taken at Its Word?

    CAN GOOGLE BE TRUSTED? SHOULD GOOGLE BE TAKEN AT ITS WORD? IF SO, WHICH ONE? GOOGLE RECENTLY POSTED ABOUT “THE PRINCIPLES THAT HAVE GUIDED US FROM THE BEGINNING.” THE FIVE PRINCIPLES ARE: DO WHAT’S BEST FOR THE USER. PROVIDE THE MOST RELEVANT ANSWERS AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE. LABEL ADVERTISEMENTS CLEARLY. BE TRANSPARENT. LOYALTY, NOT LOCK-IN. BUT, CAN GOOGLE BE TAKEN AT ITS WORD? AND IF SO, WHICH ONE? HERE’S A LOOK AT WHAT GOOGLE EXECUTIVES HAVE SAID ABOUT THESE PRINCIPLES IN THE PAST. DECIDE FOR YOURSELF WHO TO TRUST. “DO WHAT’S BEST FOR THE USER” “DO WHAT’S BEST FOR THE USER” “I actually think most people don't want Google to answer their questions. They want Google to tell them what they should be doing next.” Eric Schmidt The Wall Street Journal 8/14/10 EXEC. CHAIRMAN ERIC SCHMIDT “DO WHAT’S BEST FOR THE USER” “We expect that advertising funded search engines will be inherently biased towards the advertisers and away from the needs of consumers.” Larry Page & Sergey Brin Stanford Thesis 1998 FOUNDERS BRIN & PAGE “DO WHAT’S BEST FOR THE USER” “The Google policy on a lot of things is to get right up to the creepy line.” Eric Schmidt at the Washington Ideas Forum 10/1/10 EXEC. CHAIRMAN ERIC SCHMIDT “DO WHAT’S BEST FOR THE USER” “We don’t monetize the thing we create…We monetize the people that use it. The more people use our products,0 the more opportunity we have to advertise to them.” Andy Rubin In the Plex SVP OF MOBILE ANDY RUBIN “PROVIDE THE MOST RELEVANT ANSWERS AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE” “PROVIDE THE MOST RELEVANT ANSWERS AS QUICKLY
  • Complete Analysis of Netflix, Inc

    Complete Analysis of Netflix, Inc

    University of Mississippi eGrove Honors College (Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors Theses Honors College) Spring 5-1-2021 Complete Analysis of Netflix, Inc. Anna Gregory Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/hon_thesis Part of the Corporate Finance Commons Recommended Citation Gregory, Anna, "Complete Analysis of Netflix, Inc." (2021). Honors Theses. 1765. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/hon_thesis/1765 This Undergraduate Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College (Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors College) at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMPLETE ANALYSIS OF NETFLIX, INC. By Anna Kathryn Gregory A thesis submitted to the faculty of The University of Mississippi in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors College. Oxford, MS April 2021 Approved By ______________________________ Advisor: Professor Bonnie Van Ness ______________________________ Reader: Professor Lin Ge ______________________________ Reader: Professor Mark Walker 2 © 2020 Anna Kathryn Gregory ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii DEDICATION This thesis is dedicated to everyone who has encouraged and motivated me throughout this process. To my parents, Bert and Angel Gregory, thank you for pushing me and believing in me. To my fiancé, Trevor Buse, thank you for believing in me and supporting through the hard times. I could not have made it through this process without all of the love and support that you each provide! iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thank you to Dr. Bonnie Van Ness for being my advisor throughout this process and for helping me find a topic I am passionate about.
  • Alphabet Board of Directors

    Alphabet Board of Directors

    WMHSMUN XXXIV Alphabet Board of Directors Background Guide “Unprecedented committees. Unparalleled debate. Unmatched fun.” Letters From the Directors Dear Delegates, Hello delegates! My name is Katie Weinsheimer, and I am looking forward to meeting you all on Zoom this fall at WMHSMUN XXXIV. The world of international Internet governance and the moral/ethical issues that arise from the introduction of ‘smart’ technology have been an interest of mine throughout my college career, so I am very excited to delve into these issues as your committee director for the Alphabet Board of Directors. I am a senior international relations major from Silver Spring, MD. I am in the St. Andrews William & Mary Joint Degree Programme, which means I am coming back to W&M after studying abroad in Scotland for two years. I joined William & Mary’s International Relations Club as a freshman after doing model United Nations in high school like all of you. I have loved my time in the club and have loved being involved in all of the conferences the College hosts. I am currently the registration director for our middle school conference, WMIDMUN XIX. Outside of model UN, I love reading, traveling, and cooking/trying new restaurants. But enough about me, you are here for stock market domination! As the Alphabet Board of Directors, you are responsible for the financial health of Alphabet and its subsidiary companies. Directors are charged with assessing and managing the risk associated with Alphabet’s various investments. This committee will take place in November 2020. With COVID-19 raging and poised to worsen in the winter months, the Board will have to make tough decisions about current and future investments.