DOCSLIB.ORG

Parish and Town Council Submissions to the Gloucestershire County Council Electoral Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Parish and Town Council Submissions to the Gloucestershire County Council Electoral Review Parish and town council submissions to the Gloucestershire County Council electoral review. This PDF document contains 26 submissions from parish and town councils. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Click on the submission you would like to view. If you are not taken to that page, please scroll through the document. Page 1 of 1 Skerten, Alex From: Du nkeyson, Nicholas Sent: 25 July 2011 09:04 To: Skerten, Alex Subject: FW: Electoral Review of Gloucestershire Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Co mpleted From: ANITA SACH [ Sent: 25 July 2011 08:41 To: Reviews@ Subject: Electoral Review of Gloucestershire Alkington Parish Council strongly objects to the proposal to move it from the Vale ward to the Wotton ward. In your recommendations you claim that the revised divisions 'best reflect community identities in Gloucestershire'. You also state 'We have sought to reflect communication links, geographic factors and evidence of community identity. In the case of Alkington Parish Council (and our immediate neighbour Ham & Stone parish), your recommendations have not reflected these points at all. We have no transport links with Wotton-under-Edge so people tend to go to Berkeley for doctors, post office, shopping, library etc. The country roads used to reach Wotton from Alkington are very steep and narrow and by no means direct. There are no communication links with Wotton as Alkington parish adjoins Berkeley but not Wotton. In addition Wotton is not the automatic location for children to attend school. Children from the parish go to school in Berkeley, Dursley and Thornbury as well as Wotton. Wotton is in a different policing area from us so there would be no automatic contact with the police and County Councillor as exists now. Geographically Wotton is a Cotswold town and Alkington is in the Severn Vale - there is an escarpment between us. We feel that the boundary review has not taken into account the natural links we have with the Vale area and is trying to impose us on an area with which we have no affinity and would be difficult for the Wotton County Councillor to represent us fairly. As a parish council we work with the other parishes in the Vale area, and occasionally have joint meetings, because we often have issues of mutual interest as our parishes border each other. We request that you rethink your proposals and keep Alkington within the Vale ward. Anita Sach Clerk to Alkington Parish Council 26/07/2011 Arlingham Parish Council 22nd July 2011 Dear Sir / Madam Electoral Review of Gloucestershire: Draft Recommendation The Arlingham Parish Council has asked me to write to you regarding the Electorial Review of Gloucestershire. The Arlingham Parish Council is part of a group of Parishes called Severn Voice. This group comprises parishes which line the east bank of the river Severn; Arlingham; Elmore; Frampton on Severn; Fretherne with Saul; Hardwicke; Longney and Epney; Moreton Valence, Slimbridge and Whitminster. The group represents the common views of the parishes on such matters as the Environment Agency’s proposals for the Severn Estuary. The Council would like to suggest that any Electoral Boundary changes should ensure that the Severn Voice Parishes have one County Council representative to reflect the views of Severn Voice. Yours sincerely Andrea Welby Arlingham Parish Clerk On behalf of the Arlingham Parish Council ASHCHURCH RURAL PARISH COUNCIL 31st July 2011 Electoral Review of Gloucestershire County Council 2010 – 2011 Gloucestershire County Council - Division Boundaries Ashchurch Rural Parish Council would request that the Local Government Boundary Comm ission consider our subm ission on t his important matter for our community. Convenient and Effective Local Government The existing Count y Council Division Boundary for Ashchurch, Cleeve and Oxenton Hill fits extremely we ll into our rural area and is co- terminus with both the Borough and Parish Wards which certainly helps in effective local government. Prior to the last Boundary revi ew in 2005, the old county boundary for Ashchurch included Northway, which is a large buil t up urban area, which very clearly did not fi t into the rural nature of our parish. Due to the m any concerns over this at th is time local residents raised two petitions (one being presented to Par liament by our then M.P. Geoffrey Clifton-Brown) calling for the parish to be spl it so as to re cognise the separate identities of each area. Th is was ultimately approved and the new County Council Divisi on Boundary for Ashchu rch represents this rural identity. Therefore we strongly believe that any proposal to re-introduce Northway back into t he County Boundary for Ashchurch would not only no l onger reflect the rural nature of this division but woul d be against two petitions that our local residents raised and we believe would in fact be very much against convenient and effective Local Government. ........Continued 1 Community Identity Ashchurch Rural Parish Council cons ider that there are many areas of community identi ty that are good exam ples why t he current Gloucestershire County Council elector al division for Ashchurch, Cleeve and Oxenton Hill works so well. Some examples of t his would be the very rural nature that this division covers – i.e. Stoke Orchard, Tred ington. Prescott, Oxenton, Walton Cardiff, Southam , Gotheringt on, Wood mancote etc. who all have very similar needs. Recently when rura l Post Offices and telephone boxes were under threat of closure/ rem oval, the knowledge and experience gained from across this division was invaluable to our Parish. Issues like the lack of rural bus services and hea lth care are also very similar across this current divi sion. Another excel lent example would be the floods of 2007 and the subsequent loss drinking of water, under the um brella of this current division the rura l vill ages and ham lets were very quickl y organised and identifies for help & distribution. We therefore firm ly believe this im portant co mmunity identity m ust b e maintained. Should the Boundary Comm ission consider that an increase in elector al nu mbers is necessary then we wo uld suggest that the Commission consider the area east of Ashchurch due to its rural identity. Name of Division We support the current name for the Ashchurch, Cleeve and Oxenton Hill Division. Cathy Reid Parish Clerk Ashchurch Rural Parish Council 2 Page 1 of 1 Skerten, Alex From: Berkeley Town Clerk [ Sent: 18 July 2011 22:35 To: Skerten, Alex Subject: Gloucestershire County Council - Electoral Review Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Re d To Alex Skerten Local Government Boundary Commission Berkeley Town Council considered the electoral review for Gloucestershire County Council and wishes to make the following comments Berkeley has no connection with Cam. We are a rural community that is closer to other parishes in the Severn Vale. We will lose our distinctive historical identity if we are linked with Cam. We will be dominated by a larger urban conurbation. We have existing ties with surrounding parishes of Ham & Stone and Alkington. We would rather remain in a Severn Vale based electoral division Regards Debbie Spiers Town Clerk Berkeley Town Council 19/07/2011 Page 1 of 1 Skerten, Alex From: Sent: 19 July 2011 09:45 To: Skerten, Alex Subject: re boundary commission review-bishops cleeve Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Red Gloucestershire County Council Electoral Review Bishops Cleeve Parish Council Submission to LGBCE Bishops Cleeve Division We believe the electoral figures for Bishops Cleeve in 2016 are too low given tha t outline planning permission has been granted for up to 450 dwellings to the North of Bishops Cleeve. Full planning permission has recently been granted for the first phase by Tewkesbury Borough Council and we anticipate that construction of all dwellings will be complete by 2016. This is inconsistent with the growth of only 100 electors betwee n 2011 and 2016 as indicated in the LGBCE figur es. Assuming an average of 2 electors per dwelling would increase the 2016 figure by a further 800 electors. It is further note d that this could be a significant underestimate as there are applications for around a further 1,000 dwellings which will be determined by a Planning Inspector in September 2011. We n ote that the Tewkesbury Borough Council Ward of Oxenton Hill has been spli t between the proposed electoral divisions of Tewkesbury Newtown (Oxenton Parish) and Bishops Cleeve (Stoke Orchard and Gotherington Parishes). Bishops Cleeve is a large urban conurbation very different in character to the parishes contained within Oxento n Hill Ward. We would therefo re propose moving Got herington and Stoke Orchard Parishes from Bishops Cleeve Div ision to Tewkesbury Ne wtown Division. This would significantly improve coterminosity with the Borough ward boundaries. After accounting for the further 800 electors for 2016, Bishops Cleeve Di vision would still be larger than the proposed Tewkesbury and Churchdown Divisions and would not significantly increase the maximum variance for any division (15% as against current 14% proposal). The second tab on the attached spreadsheet includes the impact of our proposed changes to the current proposals. Tewkesbury and Forest of Dean District Divisions We fail to see the rationale for allocating 7 electoral divisions to Tewkesbury District and 8 to Forest of Dean District. The sizes of the two Districts will be virtually identical in 2016 based on the review figures (68,042 versus 68,650) and would be virtually identical based on our above proposed 400 increase in the Bishops Cleeve 2016 projected electorate. We would therefore propose parity in the number of electoral divisions between Tewkesbury and Forest of Dean Districts.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • St Matthews Court, Cainscross, Stroud, Gloucestershire, GL5 4LH Price £85,000 (Leasehold) St Matthews Court, Cainscross, Stroud, GL5 4LH
    St Matthews Court, Cainscross, Stroud, Gloucestershire, GL5 4LH Price £85,000 (Leasehold) St Matthews Court, Cainscross, Stroud, GL5 4LH A well presented TWO bedroom first floor duplex retirement apartment within this purpose built complex. Modern fitted kitchen and shower suite. Stair lift to main bedroom. The first floor apartments are conveniently accessed via a lift. Outside can be found the landscaped communal courtyard gardens. Sawyers Estate Agents are delighted to offer to the market INNER HALL SELLING AGENT chain free this two bedroom first floor duplex retirement Coving, doors to: Sawyers Estate Agents apartment (over two floors) within this purpose built 17 George Street complex situated off Church Road in Cainscross. SITTING ROOM/BEDROOM TWO 4.45m (14'7'') x 2.82m Stroud (9'3'') Gloucestershire The first floor apartments are conveniently accessed via a Double glazed window to rear, coving, built in airing cupboard GL5 3DP lift. The accommodation in brief comprises: Private housing water tank, television point and electric storage heater. entrance, entrance hall, dining room, kitchen, living 01453 751647 room/bedroom two, bathroom with a further bedroom of SHOWER ROOM [email protected] the first floor. Suite comprising shower cubicle with `Mira Sport` shower, low www.sawyersestateagents.co.uk level W/C, wash hand basin set within vanity unit with roll edge Outside can be found the landscaped communal courtyard tops, wall mounted mirror unit with shaver point and spotlight, Local Authority garden and allocated parking. Benefits include a `Lifeline` part tiled walls, electric heated towel rail, `lifeline` emergency Stroud District Council - Band B call system with emergency switches in most roms.
    [Show full text]
  • 4542 the London Gazette, 21 August, 1953
    4542 THE LONDON GAZETTE, 21 AUGUST, 1953 Railway Line by way of an overhead reinforced Standish—Hope Cottage, Gloucester Road, Stone- concrete footbridge with approaches. house. A certified copy of the Order and of the map con- Tirley—Torsend Cottage, Tirley. tained in the Order as confirmed by the Minister has Twigworth—c/o Mr. E. J. Jones, Far End, Twig- been deposited at the Council Offices, Argyle Road* worth. Sevenoaks, and will be open for inspection free of Upton St. Leonards—'Village Hall, Upton St. charge between the hours of 9 a.m. and 5.30 p.m. on Leonards. Weekdays and between 9 a.m. and 12 noon on Westbury-on-Severn—Lecture Hall, Westbury-on- Saturday. Severn. The Order becomes operative as from 'the 21st Whitminster—c/o iMr. A. E. Wyer, The Garage, day of August, 1953, but if any person aggrieved Whitminster. by the Order desires to question the validity thereof In exceptional circumstances special arrangements or of any provision contained therein on the grounds will be made for the draft map and statement to be that it is not within the powers of the National Parks inspected out of office hours. and Access to the Countryside Act, 1949, or on the Any objection or representation with respect to ground -that any requirement of the Act or any the draft map or statement may be sent in writ- regulation made thereunder has not been complied ing to the undersigned before the 30th day of April, with in relation to the approval of the Order he 1954, and any such objection or representation should may.
    [Show full text]
  • Overbutterrow House Over Butterrow • Rodborough Common • Stroud • Gloucestershire • GL5 5BP
    OverbutterrOw HOuse Over Butterrow • Rodborough Common • Stroud • Gloucestershire • GL5 5BP OverbutterrOw HOuse Over Butterrow • Rodborough Common Stroud • Gloucestershire • GL5 5BP ‘A substantial family house situated on the edge of Rodborough Common.’ Stroud 2 miles, Minchinhampton 3 miles, Nailsworth 3 miles, Kemble Station 13 miles, Cirencester 13 miles, Cheltenham 15 miles All mileages are approximate Reception hall • 2 cloakrooms • Drawing room • Dining room • Garden room Music room • Studio • Kitchen/ breakfast room • Family room 6 first floor bedrooms • 3 bathrooms 4 second floor rooms • Lower ground floor rooms Private landscaped gardens • Swimming pool • Garaging All in about 1.45 acres Savills Cirencester 1 Castle Street, Market Place Cirencester GL7 1QD [email protected] +44 (0) 1285 627 550 www.savills.co.uk Situation Overbutterrow is a private close of 10 houses situated on Communications in the area are excellent with rail services room, thus making for a splendid informal living area. Rodborough Common- an area of about 300 acres managed by available from Stroud and Kemble Stations, connecting with The first floor comprises an impressive principal bedroom suite the National Trust in an area designated as being Outstanding London Paddington, the journey time being about 1.5 hours. which includes a large walk in wardrobe, a luxury bathroom and Natural Beauty. The nearest centre is Stroud which offers a Road networks radiate through the region to the larger centres of a private balcony. There are five further bedrooms on this floor good range of everyday services including a Waitrose and a well Cheltenham, Gloucester and Swindon and the motorway network together with two family bathrooms.
    [Show full text]
  • 66 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    66 bus time schedule & line map 66 Stonehouse - Leonard Stanley - King's Stanley - View In Website Mode Stroud - Painswick - Cheltenham The 66 bus line (Stonehouse - Leonard Stanley - King's Stanley - Stroud - Painswick - Cheltenham) has 5 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Brockworth: 3:30 PM (2) Cheltenham: 6:30 AM - 5:12 PM (3) Stonehouse: 7:10 AM - 10:15 PM (4) Stroud: 7:25 AM - 5:20 PM (5) Stroud: 7:39 PM - 11:59 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 66 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 66 bus arriving. Direction: Brockworth 66 bus Time Schedule 13 stops Brockworth Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 3:30 PM Church Of the Holy Spirit, Paganhill 106 Stratford Road, Stroud Tuesday 3:30 PM Beard's Lane, Paganhill Wednesday 3:30 PM Beards Lane, Stroud Thursday Not Operational Sgs College, Stroud Friday 3:30 PM Tesco, Stroud Saturday Not Operational Stratford Park, Stroud Salmon Springs, Stroud 66 bus Info Painswick Valley Car Sales, Stroud Direction: Brockworth Stops: 13 Painswick Road, Pitchcombe Trip Duration: 38 min Line Summary: Church Of the Holy Spirit, Paganhill, Wragg Castle Lane, Pitchcombe Beard's Lane, Paganhill, Sgs College, Stroud, Tesco, Stroud, Stratford Park, Stroud, Salmon Springs, Cheltenham Road, Pitchcombe Civil Parish Stroud, Painswick Valley Car Sales, Stroud, King's Mill Lane, Painswick Painswick Road, Pitchcombe, Wragg Castle Lane, Pitchcombe, King's Mill Lane, Painswick, Rugby Club, Painswick, St Mary's Church, Painswick, Toby Rugby Club,
    [Show full text]
  • Baker Arthur Richard 1918 Absent Voter (Butterrow) Ball Herbert
    RODBOROUGH – MEN & WOMEN WITH WW1 SERVICE Baker Arthur Richard 1918 absent voter (Butterrow) Ball Herbert Charles Stroud News 23/04/1915: Enlisted. Lightpill Ball William Richard Stroud Journal. 26/11/1915: Under the Derby Scheme, passed the medical test for the reserve. Rodborough. Stroud News 02/03/1917: Rifleman W.R. Ball of Bath Rd, Stroud, has been home on sick leave suffering from trench feet and frost bite. Formerly employed as a clerk at Lodgemore Mills (he) enlisted in the Gloucesters in June 1916. He proceeded to France and at Le Havre was attached to the Rifle Brigade and afterwards to the Kings Royal Rifles. 1918 Absent voter (Bath Rd) Ball Herbert Charles Lightpill. Stroud News 23/4/1915 enlisted 1918 absent voter 15 RODBOROUGH – MEN & WOMEN WITH WW1 SERVICE Ball William Richard Stroud News 26/11/1915. Enlisted Reserve. Rodborough 1918 absent voter (Bath Rd) Barnfield Thomas 1918 absent voter (Spillmans Pitch) Barrett John 1918 absent voter (Bath Rd) Barrett Wesley Mendelssohn 1918 absent voter (Butterrow) Bassett Alfred Edward Stroud and The Great War published by Stroud News 1920: Serving with 5th Glos Rgt. Butterrow School log book 19/01/1917: Alfred Bassett home from France on 10 days Furlough called – he has been at the front for two winters. 1918 absent voter (Butterrow) 16 RODBOROUGH – MEN & WOMEN WITH WW1 SERVICE Bassett E.E. Stroud and The Great War published by Stroud News 1920: Serving with R.N. Bassett G.E. Bassett Norris William 1918 absent voter (Butterrow) Bassett S. Sidney? Stroud and The Great War published by Stroud News 1920: Serving with R.F.A.
    [Show full text]
  • 00052 Leonard Stanley Parish Council
    LEONARD STANLEY PARISH COUNCIL To the Local Plan Review Team Stroud District Council Ebley Mill Stroud GL5 4UB 7th January 2020 Local Plan Review - Draft Plan for Consultation November 2019 LSPC is extremely disappointed that little has been done to address their concerns raised in their response (dated 15th January 2019) to the previous consultation for the ‘Emerging Strategy’ and has several objections to the approach now being put forward. 1) According to page 33 (2.48) states: “Modest housing allocations will also be delivered at the local service centres of Berkeley, Minchinhampton, Nailsworth and Painswick and lesser levels of housing will be allocated at the Tier 3a villages of Brimscombe and Thrupp, Frampton-on-Severn, Kings Stanley, Kingswood, Leonard Stanley and Whitminster.” However, this is contradicted on Page 51 under Core Policy CP2 where the key service centres are allocated housing of between 20 and 120; whereas Tier 3a villages of Brimscombe and Thrupp, Kingswood, Leonard Stanley and Whitminster have been allocated between 40 and 190! As the statement on page 33 is mis-leading, this needs to be removed and replaced by a statement that reflects the true situation. 2) Page 50 under the description for Tier 3a – Accessible Settlement with Local Facilities “Further development will be focused inside the settlement development limits or (exceptionally) on the edge of settlements, subject to meeting criteria set out in the Plan’s Core and Delivery policies, and will principally meet specific local housing, employment and community infrastructure needs, with a view to safeguarding or enhancing each settlement’s current role, function and accessibility.” The statement of ‘exceptionally’ permitting development outside the SDL is a green light for developers to manipulate and is open to misinterpretation and therefore is a great risk to villages like Leonard Stanley.
    [Show full text]
  • GLOUCESTERSHIRE Extracted from the Database of the Milestone Society
    Entries in red - require a photograph GLOUCESTERSHIRE Extracted from the database of the Milestone Society National ID Grid Reference Road No. Parish Location Position GL_AVBF05 SP 102 149 UC road (was A40) HAMPNETT West Northleach / Fosse intersection on the verge against wall GL_AVBF08 SP 1457 1409 A40 FARMINGTON New Barn Farm by the road GL_AVBF11 SP 2055 1207 A40 BARRINGTON Barrington turn by the road GL_AVGL01 SP 02971 19802 A436 ANDOVERSFORD E of Andoversford by Whittington turn (assume GL_SWCM07) GL_AVGL02 SP 007 187 A436 DOWDESWELL Kilkenny by the road GL_BAFY07 ST 6731 7100 A4175 OLDLAND West Street, Oldland Common on the verge almost opposite St Annes Drive GL_BAFY07SL ST 6732 7128 A4175 OLDLAND Oldland Common jct High St/West Street on top of wall, left hand side GL_BAFY07SR ST 6733 7127 A4175 OLDLAND Oldland Common jct High St/West Street on top of wall, right hand side GL_BAFY08 ST 6790 7237 A4175 OLDLAND Bath Road, N Common; 50m S Southway Drive on wide verge GL_BAFY09 ST 6815 7384 UC road SISTON Siston Lane, Webbs Heath just South Mangotsfield turn on verge GL_BAFY10 ST 6690 7460 UC road SISTON Carsons Road; 90m N jcn Siston Hill on the verge GL_BAFY11 ST 6643 7593 UC road KINGSWOOD Rodway Hill jct Morley Avenue against wall GL_BAGL15 ST 79334 86674 A46 HAWKESBURY N of A433 jct by the road GL_BAGL18 ST 81277 90989 A46 BOXWELL WITH LEIGHTERTON near Leighterton on grass bank above road GL_BAGL18a ST 80406 89691 A46 DIDMARTON Saddlewood Manor turn by the road GL_BAGL19 ST 823 922 A46 BOXWELL WITH LEIGHTERTON N of Boxwell turn by the road GL_BAGL20 ST 8285 9371 A46 BOXWELL WITH LEIGHTERTON by Lasborough turn on grass verge GL_BAGL23 ST 845 974 A46 HORSLEY Tiltups End by the road GL_BAGL25 ST 8481 9996 A46 NAILSWORTH Whitecroft by former garage (maybe uprooted) GL_BAGL26a SO 848 026 UC road RODBOROUGH Rodborough Manor by the road Registered Charity No 1105688 1 Entries in red - require a photograph GLOUCESTERSHIRE Extracted from the database of the Milestone Society National ID Grid Reference Road No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Iron Age Tom Moore
    The Iron Age Tom Moore INTRODUCfiON In the twenty years since Alan Saville's (1984) review of the Iron Age in Gloucestershire much has happened in Iron-Age archaeology, both in the region and beyond.1 Saville's paper marked an important point in Iron-Age studies in Gloucestershire and was matched by an increasing level of research both regionally and nationally. The mid 1980s saw a number of discussions of the Iron Age in the county, including those by Cunliffe (1984b) and Darvill (1987), whilst reviews were conducted for Avon (Burrow 1987) and Somerset (Cunliffe 1982). At the same time significant advances and developments in British Iron-Age studies as a whole had a direct impact on how the period was viewed in the region. Richard Hingley's (1984) examination of the Iron-Age landscapes of Oxfordshire suggested a division between more integrated unenclosed communities in the Upper Thames Valley and isolated enclosure communities on the Cotswold uplands, arguing for very different social systems in the two areas. In contrast, Barry Cunliffe' s model ( 1984a; 1991 ), based on his work at Danebury, Hampshire, suggested a hierarchical Iron-Age society centred on hillforts directly influencing how hillforts and social organisation in the Cotswolds have been understood (Darvill1987; Saville 1984). Together these studies have set the agenda for how the 1st millennium BC in the region is regarded and their influence can be felt in more recent syntheses (e.g. Clarke 1993). Since 1984, however, our perception of Iron-Age societies has been radically altered. In particular, the role of hillforts as central places at the top of a hierarchical settlement pattern has been substantially challenged (Hill 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Finham Sewage Treatment Works Thermal Hydrolysis Process Plant and Biogas Upgrade Plant Variation Applications
    Finham Sewage Treatment Works Thermal Hydrolysis Process Plant and Biogas Upgrade Plant Variation Applications | 0.2 July 2020 Severn Trent Water EPR/YP3995CD/V006 Thermal Hy drolysis Process Pla nt a nd Biogas Up gra de Plan t Va ria tion Ap plica tions Sever n Tr ent Wa ter Thermal Hydrolysis Process Plant and Biogas Upgrade Plant Variation Applications Finham Sewage Treatment Works Project No: Project Number Document Title: Thermal Hydrolysis Process Plant and Biogas Upgrade Plant Variation Applications Document No.: Revision: 0.2 Document Status: <DocSuitability> Date: July 2020 Client Name: Severn Trent Water Client No: EPR/YP3995CD/V006 Project Manager: Mark McAree Author: James Killick File Name: Document2 Jacobs U.K. Limited Jacobs House Shrewsbury Business Park Shrewsbury Shropshire SY2 6LG United Kingdom T +44 (0)1743 284 800 F +44 (0)1743 245 558 www.jacobs.com © Copyright 2019 Jacobs U.K. Limited. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This document has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this document by any third party. Document history and status Revision Date Description Author Checked Reviewed Approved i Thermal Hydrolysis Process Plant and Biogas Upgrade Plant Variation Applications Contents Non-Technical Summary..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Journal Issue 3, May 2013
    Stonehouse History Group Journal Issue 3 May 2013 ISSN 2050-0858 Published by Stonehouse History Group www.stonehousehistorygroup.org.uk [email protected] May 2013 ©Stonehouse History Group Front cover sketch “The Spa Inn c.1930” ©Darrell Webb. We have made every effort to obtain permission from the copyright owners to reproduce their photographs in this journal. Modern photographs are copyright Stonehouse History Group unless otherwise stated. No copies may be made of any photographs in this issue without the permission of Stonehouse History Group (SHG). Editorial Team Vicki Walker - Co-ordinating editor Jim Dickson - Production editor Shirley Dicker Janet Hudson John Peters Darrell Webb Why not become a member of our group? We aim to promote interest in the local history of Stonehouse. We research and store information about all aspects of the town’s history and have a large collection of photographs old and new. We make this available to the public via our website and through our regular meetings. We provide a programme of talks and events on a wide range of historical topics. We hold meetings on the second Wednesday of each month, usually in the Town Hall at 7:30pm. £1 members; £2 visitors; annual membership £5 2 Stonehouse History Group Journal Issue 3, May 2013 Contents Obituary of Les Pugh 4 Welcome to our third issue 5 Oldends: what’s in an ‘s’? by Janet Hudson 6 Spa Inn, Oldends Lane by Janet Hudson, Vicki Walker and Shirley Dicker 12 Oldends Hall by Janet Hudson 14 Stonehouse place names by Darrell Webb 20 Charles
    [Show full text]
  • 16A Quedgeley - Haresfield - Standish - Stonehouse - Cainscross Road
    16A Quedgeley - Haresfield - Standish - Stonehouse - Cainscross Road Ebley Coaches Timetable valid from 01/05/2018 until further notice. Direction of stops: where shown (eg: W-bound) this is the compass direction towards which the bus is pointing when it stops Mondays to Fridays Service Restrictions Sch Hardwicke, just before One Stop Shop 0743 Quedgeley, o/s Telephone Exchange 0745 Haresfield, in School Entrance 0750 § Little Haresfield, by Haresfield Turn 0757 Standish, opp Court Farms 0800 § Standish, by The Shieling 0800 § Stroud Green, before Oxlynch Lane 0800 § Stroud Green, opp The Old Barn 0800 § Stonehouse, by Crowcumepill 0801 Stonehouse, corner of Horsemarling Lane 0802 § Stonehouse, nr Grosvenor Road 0802 Stonehouse, by The Nippy Chippy 0805 § Stonehouse, o/s Medical Centre 0807 Stonehouse, opp Elgin Mall 0810 § Stonehouse, corner of Pearcroft Road 0811 § Cainscross, before Marling School 0823 Stroud, Marling and Stroud High Schools (Stop 3) 0825 Saturdays Sundays no service no service Service Restrictions: Sch - Gloucestershire School Days Notes: § - Time at this stop is indicative. You are advised to be at any stop several minutes before the times shown 16A Cainscross Road - Stonehouse - Standish - Haresfield - Quedgeley Ebley Coaches Timetable valid from 01/05/2018 until further notice. Direction of stops: where shown (eg: W-bound) this is the compass direction towards which the bus is pointing when it stops Mondays to Fridays Service Restrictions Sch Stroud, Marling and Stroud High Schools (Stop 2) 1545 § Dudbridge, after
    [Show full text]
  • Forest-Of-Campus-Bus-Travel-1920.Pdf
    Stagecoach Routes Continued Gloucestershire College 746 From Huntley, Mitcheldean & Drybrook Boxbush Manor House 07:51 Cinderford GlosCol 16:35 Travel to our Forest of Dean Campus Huntley White Horse 08:00 Drybrook Cross 16:43 Huntley Sawmill 08:02 Mitcheldean Dunstone Place 16:51 2019/20 Mitcheldean Lamb 08:12 Huntley Red Lion 17:02 Bus Timetables and Pricing Information Mitcheldean Dean Magna School 08:15 Churcham Bulley Lane 17:06 Drybrook Cross 08:25 Gloucester Transport Hub 17:20 Cinderford GlosCol 08:40 Michaels Travel Route Michaels Travel ROUTE 1—St Briavels AM PM St Briavels, playing fields bus stop 07:55 17:00 Clearwell, Village Hall 08:02 16:53 Sling Crossroads 08:07 16:48 Bream School 08:15 16:40 Parkend, The Woodman Inn 08:20 16:35 Cinderford Campus, Gloscol 08:35 16:20 Passes for this route must be bought in advance from Student Services. A full year pass costs £500. This can be paid via cash/card in Student Services. You can also set up a Direct Debit. A £100 deposit will be taken to secure the bus pass, We are pleased to announce that for the 2019/20 Academic Year, Stagecoach have agreed and then 8 monthly payments (October-May) of £50. to cover the majority of the routes from the Forest Of Dean and surrounding areas to our Forest of Dean Campus in Cinderford. Questions? This means that our students will benefit from the generous discounted rates that students can access with Stagecoach. If you have any queries or questions regarding transport to the Cinderford Campus or the funding available, please contact Student Services.
    [Show full text]