US Mission to UN Agencies for Food and Agriculture

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

US Mission to UN Agencies for Food and Agriculture U.S. MISSION TO UN AGENCIES FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE READER TABLE OF CONTENTS Victor Skiles 1973-1976 USAID Representative, World Food rogram, Rome Charles Higginson 1975-1978 Deputy U.S. Representative, Food and Agricultural Organi,ation, Rome -ohn A. .aker, -r. 1977-1979 U.S. Representative, World Food rogram, Rome Roger A. Sorenson 1979-1983 ermanent Representative to United Nations Agencies, Rome 0illicent Hammond Fen1ick 1983-1987 Representative, United Nations Agencies for Food and Agriculture, Rome 3erald -. 0onroe 1989-1992 U.S. Representative, Food and Agricultural Organi,ation, Rome William Harrison 0arsh 1992-1995 Food and Agricultural Organi,ation, Rome VICTOR SKILES USAID Representative, W rld F d Pr gram R me (1973-197,- Victor Skiles was born in Idaho. He attended the University of Idaho at Moscow and received his BA in 194 . He also served in the US Navy in Germany. His career has included positions in countries such as Greece, Israel, East Africa, Ceylon, and Afghanistan. He was interviewed by John Kean on December 4, 1995. S6I7ES9 .efore I left 6abul I thought I 1as going fairly quickly to Rome as the AID representative to the World Food rogram and the FAO, but that turned out to take more time than I had anticipated. International organi,ations had al1ays had a bit of a mystique for most of us. To the extent that 1e 1ere internationalists, they 1ere more than a little bit interesting but they'd never been a very big part of our operation or our consideration. They'd been some1here out on the fringe. In the early '60s, 1e had a small cell in C 1hich had come over from the State Department, concerned primarily, as I recall, 1ith the Columbo lan and the UNCTAD, the trade and development organi,ation of the UN. .y 1972, a lot of changes had been made program-1ise and in terms of organi,ation. There 1as a fairly large group in C 1orking on international organi,ations. Several people on the UN proper and 1hat 1ere kno1n as the speciali,ed agencies -- one separate unit on contact 1ith the I0F and I.RD (1hich there had been for some timeA, and limited numbers 1ith the other functions 1ith other UN agencies. art of the process, as you recall, and this refers to the organi,ation comments earlier, had been a gro1ing recognition of AID in a role of responsibility for coordinating U.S. development assistance abroad (1ithout necessarily relieving other agencies of their interests or corollary roles as 1e 1ill see laterAB and at the same time the desire on the part of AID and the adoption of policies to rely more on the international agencies both to shape and to carry out assistance programs. No1, most of us -- certainly myself included -- had an interpretation far too narro1, having in mind primarily the reliance on the International .ank for Reconstruction and Development and the I0F to set policies 1ith respect to given areas -- given countries -- and to help the country provide the frame1ork for programs 1ithin 1hich the rest of us 1ould 1ork. This, of course, 1as not ne1, 1e'd been doing it for some time in the countries 1here I.RD had taken an interest and had sent out survey teams. They 1ere able to pick our brains as 1ell as everybody else's and came up 1ith some very reputable country development programs. Where this 1as the case it 1as advantageous for us to fit into it. And to a lot of people, this meant that 1e 1ere no longer so involved in overall development concepts and problems as much as 1e 1ere involved in picking out parts of that process 1hich 1e tend to define as the proCects. ./ 0r sectors1 S6I7ES9 Or sector programs, yes. .ut to others it meant more than that. It meant the other UN agencies also increasing their roles in the development business, hence in C an increase in their role of 1orking 1ith the United Nations agencies. This also relates, of course, to the revised style and role of USAID's reorgani,ation 1ork 1hich 1as going on at that time and 1as part of the complex that I 1alked into and that explains, to some extent, 1hy it took so long for me to get to Rome. 7et me hasten to say, though, that the main reasons for the delay 1ere frictions and disagreements that had built up bet1een the groups and the people involved. When I 1ent through Washington on the 1ay to Idaho to indulge in that favorite pastime that 1e call home leave, I 1as advised that the job 1as all set up, that I 1as the chosen instrument to carry it out. There 1ere a fe1 little problems to 1ork out 1ith State but these 1ould be taken care of 1hile I 1as on home leave and 1hen I came back I should expect to be going in short order. I suppose this 1as in mid '72, and, as it turned out those things had not been 1orked out 1ith State and they 1eren't for quite a long time. I didn't get to Rome until April of 1973. So I had quite enough time in Washington to get a re-education -- something of an education on the international institutions and to 1ork on various problems such as the one on implementation of the reorgani,ation. During the process, I became convinced that some things 1e 1ere doing 1ith the international organi,ations 1ere pretty bad, in the sense that, to use the example of the proCect approval process, 1hat 1e 1ere doing, it seemed to me, made it impossible for the UND to operate 1ith any semblance of efficiency in carrying out a development program. It took forever to get clearance by members of the governing body for a proCect 1hich UND 1anted to carry out, partly because the function just 1asn't taken all that seriously in AID D Washington, and there 1ere not competent personnel assigned to the task of getting the job done. ./ Let me see if I understand. Can you elaborate a little bit 33 just to be specific 33 whether the pro4ects you were talking about were UN,5 pro4ects or USAI, pro4ects1 S6I7ES9 UND proCects. .ut the system that had been set up -- 1ell, 1e'll come back to this later because it affects most of the 1hole UN system. The system that had been set up 1as for proCect clearance by members of the governing council of the international agency before the agency could go ahead 1ith any kind of implementation. In AID Washington, there 1as a huge backlog of proCects that had not been processed -- 1e had not said yesB 1e had not said no. I could just picture the guys at UND in Ne1 Eork holding their breath for month after month 1hile 1e got around to deciding 1hether to clear a proCect or not. In other 1ords, it just 1asn't 1orking. ./ And was this a peculiar problem in the USAI, relationship with UN,5 or did other countries have similar problems or e6ercise similar foot dragging1 S6I7ES9 I don't kno1 ho1 bad the problem 1as 1ith other countries. T1o points. First, especially if 1e are encouraging a gro1ing role in development for them, 1e should do our best to try to bring about the conditions 1hich 1ill make it possible for the UN agency to be an efficient and effective operator of its program. Second, to the extent the U.S. takes on an operational role, 1e'd better get ourselves set up to do a decent job of operating. Frankly I did not find this in C - rogram olicy and Coordination - 1hich 1as the central body for United Nations activities in AID Washington. eople 1ere too busy 1riting papers, going to meetings, preparing position papers for an upcoming meeting - far less mundane things than making sure that the operational steps in a program of a UN agency 1ere properly and expeditiously taken care of. I think it 1ill save time if I first try to sketch in a bit of the United Nations frame1ork, then of the U.S. frame1ork for 1orking 1ith the UN, then come more specifically to the FAODWF complex. The UN is not a straight line hierarchy. It is not a top to bottom organi,ation in the sense of approval, directive, and administration, though there are do1n and up reporting channels and in some phases coordinating devices. 3enerally speaking, the 3eneral Assembly and the Security Council are the entities 1e tend to think of as the UN, headquarters Ne1 Eork City. They deal primarily 1ith political and security affairs. They are serviced to considerable extent by the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOCA, also in Ne1 Eork, 1ith respect to economic, social, cultural, educational, health and related fields. Then there are a number of speciali,ed agencies dealing 1ith such things as Development (UND A, child feeding (UNICEFA, health (WHOA, education (UNESCOA. I 1ouldn't care to get into a discussion of the degree of independence of the top structure (UN3A, Security Council, ECOSOCA, but it does seem to me that the International 0onetary Fund (I0FA and the International .ank for Reconstruction and Development (I.RD, or World .ankA are the most independent, perhaps FAO next, simply because it came into existence in 1955, even before the UN proper 1as organi,ed. The World Food rogram came much later (1962A and is a bit of a hybrid. Its title is UN-FAO World Food rogram, 1hich means that it does report to both FAO and ECOSOC.
Recommended publications
  • Women in the United States Congress: 1917-2012
    Women in the United States Congress: 1917-2012 Jennifer E. Manning Information Research Specialist Colleen J. Shogan Deputy Director and Senior Specialist November 26, 2012 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL30261 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Women in the United States Congress: 1917-2012 Summary Ninety-four women currently serve in the 112th Congress: 77 in the House (53 Democrats and 24 Republicans) and 17 in the Senate (12 Democrats and 5 Republicans). Ninety-two women were initially sworn in to the 112th Congress, two women Democratic House Members have since resigned, and four others have been elected. This number (94) is lower than the record number of 95 women who were initially elected to the 111th Congress. The first woman elected to Congress was Representative Jeannette Rankin (R-MT, 1917-1919, 1941-1943). The first woman to serve in the Senate was Rebecca Latimer Felton (D-GA). She was appointed in 1922 and served for only one day. A total of 278 women have served in Congress, 178 Democrats and 100 Republicans. Of these women, 239 (153 Democrats, 86 Republicans) have served only in the House of Representatives; 31 (19 Democrats, 12 Republicans) have served only in the Senate; and 8 (6 Democrats, 2 Republicans) have served in both houses. These figures include one non-voting Delegate each from Guam, Hawaii, the District of Columbia, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Currently serving Senator Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) holds the record for length of service by a woman in Congress with 35 years (10 of which were spent in the House).
    [Show full text]
  • New Jersey in Focus: the World War I Era 1910-1920
    New Jersey in Focus: The World War I Era 1910-1920 Exhibit at the Monmouth County Library Headquarters 125 Symmes Drive Manalapan, New Jersey October 2015 Organized by The Monmouth County Archives Division of the Monmouth County Clerk Christine Giordano Hanlon Gary D. Saretzky, Curator Eugene Osovitz, Preparer Produced by the Monmouth County Archives 125 Symmes Drive Manalapan, NJ 07726 New Jersey in Focus: The World War I Era, 1910-1920 About one hundred years ago, during the 1910-1920 decade in America, the economy boomed and the Gross National Product more than doubled. Ten million Americans bought automobiles, most for the first time. Ford’s Model T, produced with then revolutionary assembly line methods, transformed family life for owners. Such personal “machines” led to paved roads and the first traffic light, reduced the need for blacksmiths and horses, increased the demand for auto mechanics and gas stations, and, when not caught up in traffic jams, sped up daily life. Some owners braved dirt roads to drive to the Jersey Shore, where thousands thronged to see the annual Baby Parade in Asbury Park. While roads at the start of the decade were barely adequate for travel in the emerging auto boom, New Jersey became a leader in the advocacy and construction of improved thoroughfares. Better road and rail transportation facilitated both industrial and agricultural production, bringing such new products as commercially grown blueberries from Whitesbog, New Jersey, to urban dwellers. In the air, history was made in 1912, when the first flight to deliver mail between two government post offices landed in South Amboy.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Robert Mcclure Interview on Helen S. Meyner John Kincaid (JK): Good Afternoon. We're at the Meyner Center with Robert Mcclur
    Robert McClure Interview on Helen S. Meyner John Kincaid (JK): Good afternoon. We’re at the Meyner Center with Robert McClure, who worked with Helen Meyner. It is Friday, September 28, 2018, at five after two in the afternoon. Also present is Diane Shaw, who is director of special collections at the library of Lafayette College. Edwin C. Landis, former law partner and friend of Robert Meyner, is here too. I’m John Kincaid, the Meyner Professor and director of the Meyner Center for the Study of State and Local Government. And so Bob, maybe you could begin by just giving us a brief bio so we can situate your work with Helen within the context of your life. Robert McClure (RM): Fair enough. I graduated from Lafayette in May of 1974. My first job out of college was as a cab driver over in Phillipsburg, where my parents lived. Within a week, I, through a family connection and some serendipity, had an interview with Governor Bob Meyner in his Phillipsburg office. Governor Meyner kept Friday morning hours in Phillipsburg even though his main law office with Mr. Landis was in Newark. He would also not only keep law hours but he was on the board of the Phillipsburg National Bank, and they would have board meetings then. So, I go down and I’m interviewed by Governor Bob and, lo and behold, I am hired. RM: I then spent a good portion of the next four-and-a-half years working for Helen. I became the coordinator of the Helen Meyner 1974 congressional campaign for Warren and Sussex counties.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jersey Hustle
    December 15, 2013 Opinion: The Jersey hustle OLDER New Jerseyans may well remember the basis of a new film — “American Hustle” — that opened last Friday. It is a fictionalized account of Abscam, the FBI stinG operation in the late 1970s and early 1980s that resulted in the conviction of three key New Jersey politicians, includinG a U.S. senator, a state senator and a member of the House of Representatives, as well as several other officials on charges including bribery and conspiracy. Abscam put New Jersey on the map as hotbed of political corruption, a reputation that we maintain today. The movie, directed by Philadelphia native David O. Russell, tells the story of a clever con man, IrvinG Rosenfeld, and his partner, Sydney Prosser, who are forced to infiltrate the wild arena of New Jersey politics and orGanized crime in the 1970s by FBI aGent Richie DiMaso. “American Hustle,” which last Thursday picked up seven Golden Globe nominations includinG best movie, actor and director, is a “fictionalized” account of “Abdul Scam” or Abscam, the FBI stinG operation, which consisted of a fictional middle eastern sheikh named Karim Abdul Rahman (thus the “Abdul” scam moniker) offerinG bribes to political leaders in eXchanGe for political asylum, money launderinG and investment opportunities. The real-life con man that the FBI hires to play the sheik, Melvin WeinberG, is the character IrvinG Rosenfeld in the film, played by Christian Bale. Included in the corruption miX were New Jersey’s Sen. Harrison A. Williams, Rep. Frank Thompson Jr., and Camden Mayor AnGelo Errichetti, all of whom were convicted and served prison time for acceptinG bribes and conspiracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record
    CONGRESSIONAL RECORD United States PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 114th CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION of America Vol. 162 Washington, Thursday, May 26, 2016 No. 84 Senate 40TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE U.S. HELSINKI COMMISSION Mr. CARDIN. Mr. President, on June 3, 1976, consideration of human rights as an element in U.S. President Gerald Ford signed into law a bill U.S. foreign policy decision-making. establishing the Commission on Security and Representatives Millicent Fenwick of New Jersey Cooperation in Europe, more commonly known and Dante Fascell of Florida created the as the U.S. Helsinki Commission. commission as a vehicle to ensure that human rights violations raised by dissident groups in the I bring this 40th anniversary next week to my Soviet Union and the Communist countries of colleagues’ attention today because the Eastern Europe were no longer ignored in U.S. commission has played a particularly significant policy. role in U.S. foreign policy. In keeping with the Helsinki Final Act’s First, the commission provided the U.S. Congress comprehensive definition of security—which with a direct role in the policymaking process. includes respect for human rights and Members and staff of the commission have been fundamental freedoms as a principle guiding integrated into official U.S. delegations to relations between states—we have reviewed the meetings and conferences of what is historically records of all participating countries, including known as the Helsinki Process. The Helsinki our own and those of our friends and allies. Process started as an ongoing multilateral conference on security and cooperation in Europe From its Cold War origins, the Helsinki that is manifested today in the 57- country, Commission adapted well to changing Vienna-based Organization for Security and circumstances, new challenges, and new Cooperation in Europe, or OSCE.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2005 and Knowledge Volume 2, Issue 1
    ALRI Newsletter Arlington Learning in Retirement Institute Connecting.... People, Community, Winter 2005 and Knowledge Volume 2, Issue 1 . N E W S A L E R T . UPCOMING EVENTS Meet the Author Series • Plan to attend the ALRI Members’ • Go behind the scenes at Signature February 7, 3:00 p.m., Arl. Central Library Open House on February 11 at the Theatre, February 15 at 5:00 p.m., Millicent Fenwick: Her Way, by George Mason University’s Arling- and learn about the process of Amy Schapiro ton Campus beginning at 9:00 a.m. mounting the upcoming production, This opportunity introduces instruc- Ten Unknowns: selecting the play, Signature Theatre Play tors and highlights Spring Semes- the script, casting, design meetings Ten Unknowns ter Courses and Special Events and technical rehearsals. On March February 15, 5 :00 p.m. at Signature Theatre 13, 7:00 p.m.: invitation to final Introduction to Signature Theatre and dress rehearsal . On March 29, 7:00 Ten Unknowns. Director Rick • The ALRI Spring Catalog has been DesRochers and his design team present mailed to members. Check out ex- p.m. at the Arlington Central Library: their approach to the production from citing new courses, favorite courses Rick DesRochers, Signature The- page-to-stage. No charge, but reserva- that will be continued, and Special atre Artistic Director, introduces tions needed. Call ALRI 703-228-2144. playwright Jon Robin Baitz’s Ten March 13, 7:00 p.m. Final Dress Rehearsal Events. Reservations needed. Call ALRI 703- Unknowns, a powerfully intense 228-2144. • Classes begin the first week in March.
    [Show full text]
  • Congress - New Members” of the Robert T
    The original documents are located in Box 10, folder “Congress - New Members” of the Robert T. Hartmann Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Some items in this folder were not digitized because it contains copyrighted materials. Please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library for access to these materials. Digitized from Box 10 of the Robert T. Hartmann Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library .., SENATE I RepuL~ans · Garn, E. J. Utah Laxalt, Paul Nevada Democrats Bumpers, Dale Arkansas Culver, John C. Iowa Ford, Wendell Kentucky Glenn, John H. Ohio Hart, Gary W. Colorado Leahy, Patrick J. Vermont Morgan, Robert B. North Carolina Stone, Richard Florida The New Hampshire race has not been decided. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES (REPUBLICANS) David F. Emery Maine Millicent Fenwick New Jersey William F. Goodling Pennsylvania Bill Gradison Ohio Charles E. Grassley Iowa Tom Hagedorn Minnesota George V. Hansen Idaho . Henry J. Hyde Illinois James M.
    [Show full text]
  • Governor Thomas Kean Interview (June 23, 2010) Michael Aron: It's the Morning of June 23, 2010. We Are in Far Hills at the Of
    Center on the American Governor, Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University http://governors.rutgers.edu/ Governor Thomas Kean Interview (June 23, 2010) Michael Aron: It’s the morning of June 23, 2010. We are in Far Hills at the office of Governor Kean. I’m Michael Aron of NJN News. We’re here for the Rutgers program on the governor, The Thomas H. Kean Archive. We began our conversations with Governor Kean in March of ’09. This is our second conversation. We left off at the end of the Governor’s Assembly career in the beginning of his run for Congress in the ’74-’75 period. That’s where we’ll take up today. Governor, before we take a look at the race for Congress against Millicent Fenwick, a theme that seemed to emerge from our first discussion was the unexpected turns that your life and career have taken. Governor Thomas Kean: Hmm. Michael Aron: This whole thing was an accident, was it? <laughs> Maybe most lives are accidents, but you never intended to be governor of the state of New Jersey as a young man. Governor Thomas Kean: No. Michael Aron: Is that how life happens? Governor Thomas Kean: I think it does for a lot of people, and I tell students that. So don’t worry, <laughs> frankly, if you’re not quite sure what you want to do with your life. And you’re going to try something that may not be what you want to do. Don’t worry about it. Try it. Because something else will come along.
    [Show full text]
  • 10/04/75 - West Virginia and New Jersey” of the Betty Ford White House Papers, 1973-1977 at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 11, folder “10/04/75 - West Virginia and New Jersey” of the Betty Ford White House Papers, 1973-1977 at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Betty Ford donated to the United States of America her copyrights in all of her unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON October 3, 197 5 MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT FROM: ROBERT T. HARTMANN SUBJECT: Newark, New Jersey, Visit October 4, 197 5 The following information has been compiled by Gwen Anderson through the Republican National Committee and other sources: Republican Fundraiser and · Prominent Republicans TAB A New Jersey Republican Party TAB B Election Statistics and Information TAB C NEW JERSEY REPUBLICAN FUNDRAISER AND PROMINENT REPUBLICANS The New Jersey fundraising events will consist of a small reception for major contributors with anticipated attendance of 30 persons followed by dinner with attendance of about 800 planned. The ticket 1 prices will be $1, 000 for the reception and $100 for the dinner. They hope to raise upwards of $100, 000.
    [Show full text]
  • Eighty-Seventh Congress January 3, 1961, to January 3, 1963
    EIGHTY-SEVENTH CONGRESS JANUARY 3, 1961, TO JANUARY 3, 1963 FIRST SESSION-January 3, 1961, to September 27, 1961 SECOND SESSION-January 10, 1962,1 to October 13, 1962 VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES-RICHARD M. NIXON,2 of California;LYNDON B. JOHNSON,2 of Texas PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE SENATE-CARL HAYDEN, of Arizona SECRETARY OF THE SENATE-FELTON MCLELLAN JOHNSTON, of Mississippi SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE SENATE-JOSEPH C. DUKE, of Arizona SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES-SAM RAYBURN,4of Texas; JOHN W. MCCORMACK,5 of Massachusetts CLERK OF THE HOUSE-RALPH R. ROBERTS,6 of Indiana SERGEANT OF ARMS OF THE HOUSE-ZEAKE W. JOHNSON, JR.,6 ofTennessee DOORKEEPER OF THE HOUSE-WILLIAM M. MILLER,6 of Mississippi POSTMASTER OF THE HOUSE-H. H. MORRIS,6 of Kentucky ALABAMA Barry M. Goldwater, Phoenix John E. Moss, Jr., Sacramento SENATORS REPRESENTATIVES William S. Mailliard, San Francisco Lister Hill, Montgomery John J. Rhodes, Mesa John F. Shelley, San Francisco John J. Sparkman, Huntsville Stewart L. Udall,' Tucson John F. Baldwin, Martinez Morris K. Udall,8 Tucson Jeffery Cohelan, Berkeley REPRESENTATIVES George P. Miller, Alameda Frank W. Boykin, Mobile ARKANSAS J. Arthur Younger, San Mateo George M. Grant, Troy Charles S. Gubser, Gilroy George W. Andrews, Union Springs SENATORS John J. McFall, Manteca Kenneth A. Roberts, Anniston John L. McClellan, Camden Bernice F. Sisk, Fresno Albert Rains, Gadeden J. William Fulbright, Fayetteville Charles M. Teague, Ojai Armistead I. Selden, Jr., Greensboro REPRESENTATIVES Harlan F. Hagen, Hanford Carl A. Elliott, Jasper Ezekiel C. Gathings, West Memphis Gordon L.
    [Show full text]
  • September 1982
    PRESIDENTIAL MOVEMENTS Rancho del Cielo, California Burbank, California LOCATION Rancho del Cielo, California DATE 01 September 1982 TIME MOVEMENTS 1613 Depart Residence via Motorcade 1617 Arrive Vortac 1620 Depart Vortac via Marine One 1714 Arrive K!IBC-TV Landing Zone , Burbank , California 1715 Depart KNBC-TV Landing Zone via Motorcade 1718 Arrive KNBC-T V Studios 1826 Depart KNBC-TV Studios via Moto r cade 1828 Arrive KHBC- TV Landing Zone 1832 Depart KNBC-TV Landing Zone via Marine One 1923 Arrive Vortac 1924 Depart Vortac via ~:Otorcade 1930 Arrive Residence WHCA FORM 15, OCTOBER 15, 1980 PRESIDENTIAL MOVEMENTS Rancho del Cielo, California San Marcos Ranch , California LOCATION Rancho del Cielo, California OATE 03 September 1982 ' TIME MOVEMENTS 1720 Depart Residence via Motorcade l 72li Arrive Vortac 1725 Depart Vortac via Marine One 1736 Arrive San Marcos Ranch, California 1820 Depart San Marcos Ranch via Marine One 1828 Arrive Vortac 1830 Depart Vortac via Motorcade 183li Arrive Residence .. WHCA FORM 15, OCTOBER 15, 1980 [ 9/if/$~;*- No '1144f-en t'A/ lsc11rretl ,,qf- -r.·~e .,.p fn.o ceJ.r:.vtf] 8/19/82 Wednesday, September l to N Cali fornia - at the Ranch Sunday, September 5 : Sunday, September 5 Evening N Return to the White House Monday, September 6 9 : 00 am Staff Time (Baker, Meese , Deaver) Oval Office (30 min) 9 : 30 am National.- Securit.y. Briefing (Clark) oval Offic (15 min) 9:45 am Senior Staf ! 1irne OVal Off ice (15 min) 10 : 00 am Personal Staff Time Oval Office (.60 min) ·. T To New Jersey for Labor Day Event (Millicent Fenwick) Return to White House 8/19/82 Wednesday, September 1 to N California - at the Ranch Sunday, September 5 Sunday, September 5 Evening N Return to the White House Monday, Sep~ember 6 9: 00 am Staff Time (Baker, Meese, Deaver) Oval Offic~ (30 min) .
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Brief: the Lasting Impact of the Helsinki Process
    Policy Brief Foreign Policy Program November 2014 Summary: Only with the adop- The Lasting Impact of the Helsinki Process tion of the Helsinki Final Act, in Helsinki, Finland in August1975, by Martin Sletzinger did it eventually become stan- dard international practice, not just in Europe but around the world, to hold governments accountable for the manner in Introduction long-held Soviet post-World War II which they treated their popula- In the 21st century, human rights and ambition for a pan-European security tions. On issues covered by the the whole process of the promotion conference that would formally ratify Helsinki Final Act, and not just of human dignity in all of its forms human rights and humanitarian the post-war borders and security concerns, traditional diplomacy is taken for granted. It may come as realities in Europe, combined with a has now given way to a more a surprise to some that the practice NATO-led desire to exploit this Soviet public diplomacy that includes of calling into question respect for imperative by seeking the inclusion of both diplomats and public human rights and freedoms in other Western visions of respect for human leaders. states — publicly and in international rights and the human dimension. The fora — was virtually unknown until Soviets hoped such a new world order 1975. would eventually undermine the NATO alliance in favor of a toothless Only with the adoption of the pan-European security order. Helsinki Final Act, in Helsinki, Finland in August1975, did it eventu- Soviet desire for a treaty-like docu- ally become standard international ment ratifying post-war borders was practice, not just in Europe but understandable.
    [Show full text]