Case Studies on Fish Loss Assessment of Small-Scale Fisheries in Indonesia
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
FIAM/C1129 (En) FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular ISSN 2070-6065 CASE STUDIES ON FISH LOSS ASSESSMENT OF SMALL-SCALE FISHERIES IN INDONESIA Cover photograph: Research and Development Centre for Marine and Fisheries Product Processing and Biotechnology, Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries. Photo credit © RDCMFPPB FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No.1129 FIAM/C1129 (En) CASE STUDIES ON FISH LOSS ASSESSMENT OF SMALL-SCALE FISHERIES IN INDONESIA Singgih Wibowo Bagus Sediadi Bandol Utomo Syamdidi Research and Development Center for Marine and Fisheries Product Processing and Biotechnology Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fishery The Republic of Indonesia Ansen R Ward Yvette Diei-Ouadi Siar Susana Petri Suuronen Food and Agriculture Organization Rome, Italy FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2017 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. ISBN 978-92-5-109462-4 © FAO, 2017 FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way. All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licence-request or addressed to [email protected]. FAO information products are available on the FAO website (www.fao.org/publications) and can be purchased through [email protected]. iii PREPARATION OF THIS DOCUMENT This document presents the report of fish loss assessment case studies conducted within the framework of FAO’s Save Food programme and coordinated by FAO’s Fish Products, Trade and Marketing Branch (FIAM). Following the national capacity development workshop (National Workshop on Post-Harvest Fish Losses in Indonesia) on post-harvest fisheries loss assessment, held in Jakarta, Indonesia on 29–30 September 2014, in the aegis of the “Technology Expo on Marine and Fisheries Product Processing and Biotechnology 2014”, four loss assessment studies were conducted between October 2014 and September 2015. The first case study was on Muara Angke, where the research team was trained in carrying out loss assessment and getting familiar with the tools that were subsequently used in other fishing locations in Java: gillnet fisheries in Tegal, Central Java; gillnet fisheries in Gunung Kidul, Yogyakarta; and small pelagic processed fish in Brondong, East Java. The preliminary draft was submitted following the “National Workshop on Fish Loss Assessments: Causes and Solutions”, held on 3 November 2015. During the Workshop, participants: exchanged lessons learned from the field research; validated data on fish losses; identified the critical control point of fish losses and efforts to reduce them; and identified opportunities for collective action to be implemented at the local, regional and global levels. The draft was thoroughly reviewed by FAO’s international consultant and post-harvest fisheries and fishing operations technical officers before the final version was then edited and published. iv FAO. 2017. Case studies on fish loss assessment of small-scale fisheries in Indonesia, by Singgih Wibowo, Ansen R. Ward, Yvette Diei-Ouadi, Siar Susana and Petri Suuronen. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1129. Rome, Italy. ABSTRACT The fish loss assessment methodology outlined by the Save Food programme (FAO, 2014) and with reference to earlier work by Ward and Jeffries (2000) and Diei-Ouadi and Mgawe (2011) had been used to undertake assessments in different locations in Java where the focus has been on particular fishing gear, fish species and products. These were major fishery products (with the main focus on squid products) in Muara Angke Fishing Port, North Jakarta, DKI Jakarta; gillnet fisheries in Tegal, Central Java; gillnet fisheries in Gunung Kidul, Yogyakarta; and small pelagic processed fish in Brondong, East Java. They were selected for their role in general fish supply, food security and employment, and for their prevalence in gillnet fisheries. The objective was to develop an up-to-date and detailed understanding of different types of losses affecting food security and stakeholders’ livelihoods. The key findings validated at the “National Workshop on Fish Loss Assessments: Causes and Solutions”, held on 3 November 2015, can be summarized as follows: Physical losses were generally negligible (about 5 percent). However, a key factor in fish waste that affects this amount is the bycatch, which has a potential environmental and biodiversity impact. It is estimated that the annual loss for the total fleet annual is: 100 dolphins (5 tonnes), 100 turtles (5 to 200 kg each), 300 shark-suckers, crabs, murex and jellyfish, most of which in the net. Discards at sea (especially during the peak season) also occur and are cause for concern. Poor quality raw material for processing, with substandard quality product identified only after thawing in the case of frozen products, forms the bulk of the quality losses. In addition to poor hygiene practices and facilities, another significant loss is the quality loss due to prolonged soaking time, i.e. 12 hours. This, combined with prolonged and poor on-board handling and storage, lead to 24.9 tonnes (99 percent in weight) in reduced quality, which is equal to a 28 percent loss in value per trip of the catch in locations such as Tegal. Market force losses are not considered significant, but do occur during religious holidays when demand is low. Low demand is often followed by periods of high demand. Recommended interventions in the fields of policy, legislation, technology, infrastructure and services, knowledge and skills have been identified, the most recurrent of which across study locations are: Ensure access to an adequate supply of affordable potable water for hygiene, sanitation, processing and ice making. Experiment with alternative gear types to curb “ghost fishing” by lost gillnets. Also, locations where fishers use better practices (shorter net soaking times in Gunung Kidul) can be used to demonstrate the benefits in terms of reducing quality loss. Address the market force and quality losses by improving storage facilities (numbers and capacities) and their management to leverage against price and supply fluctuations. Consider a resi gudang (the warehouse receipt or “storage cheque”) system as per UU No. 9/2006 (Law No. 9/2006) for application in the fishery sector. Lessons learned from the past use of resi gudang should be used to guide all interventions to better manage the gap between supply and demand during and after religious holidays. v CONTENTS Page Preparation of this documents iii Abstract iv Abbreviations and acronyms vi Executive Summary vii Introduction 1 Methodology 1 Past and ongoing loss reduction interventions in Indonesia 3 A. Fish loss assessment on boiled salted squid product in Muara Angke, north Jakarta, DKI Jakarta 5 B. Fish loss assessment on gillnet capture fisheries in Tegal 25 C. Fish loss assessment on gillnet capture fisheries in Gunung Kidul, Yogyakarta 51 D. Fish loss assessment on small demersal fish in Brondong, east Java 73 ANNEXES 1. Community participatory survey form 95 2. Selected value chain actors’ participatory survey form 105 vi ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS EFLAM Exploratory Fish Loss Assessment Method FAD Fish aggregating device GHP Good handling practices GMP Good manufacturing practices GT Gross tonnage IDR Indonesian rupiah (IDR13 500/US$1, in 2015) LT Load tracking MMAF Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fishery PPHPT Pusat pengolahan hasil perikanan tradisional (traditional fishery products processing centre) PKPP Pengelola Kawasan Pelabuhan Perikanan (Management of Fishing Port Area) PPI Pelabuhan Pendaratan Ikan (fish landing port) RDCMFPPB Research and Development Center for Marine and Fisheries Product Processing and Biotechnology TPI Tempat Pelelangan Ikan (fish landing centre) UPT Unit Pelaksana Teknis (local technical authority) vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This is a summary of the results of fish loss assessment case studies conducted by the FAO SAVE FOOD programme. Between October 2014 and December 2015, the Koperasi Artha Mina (KAM) conducted four post-harvest fish loss assessment case studies under this Programme. The case studies were: Major fishery products (focused on squid) in Muara Angke Fishing Port, North Jakarta, DKI Jakarta; Gillnet fisheries in Tegal, Central Java; Gillnet fisheries Gunung Kidul, Yogyakarta; Small pelagic processed Fish in Brondong, East Java. Using the Save Food