Historic Resource Study September 1976 I I I

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Historic Resource Study September 1976 I I I ~ooj I historic resource study september 1976 I I I NAT!Oi·J-':'.~- -~~K :_;En\!!Cf. I DENVi:~1 S~~f~': ~>: C:::'-1TCH BR/~J,l.Cl1 D~-~ r:.:c;:.:2{;,n.:~PH!CS t!GRAH~( c.-_;:·y 0 I NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK I VIRGINIA -I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I United States Department of the Interior I National Park Service I I I I I I HISTORIC RESOURCE STUDY THE BRITISH DEFENSES OF YORKTOWN, 1781 I COLONIAL NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK I VIRGINIA I I I I by Erwin N. Thompson I I I I I DENVER SERVICE CENTER HISTORIC PRESERVATION DIVISION NATIONAL PARK SERVICE I UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DENVER, COLORADO I September 1976 I I I I PREFACE I This study on the British defenses at Yorktown has been prepared in accordance with the approved planning directive for the project (Package 180). The desired objective has been to complete a document that will prove useful to the needs of management, preservation, in­ I terpretation, and planning. Whether that objective has been attained will be known soon enough. Meanwhile, the experience has been exhil­ I arating, frightening, enjoyable, worrisome, exciting, and behind schedule. Logically, a specialist in the American Revolution would be the proper person to prepare a study on Lord Cornwallis's sojourn at York­ I town. But, things being the way they are, a non-specialist who had no prior exposure to the Revolutionary period was chosen. This choice should result in some interesting·reading. Nevertheless, it has been a fine adventure resulting in great associations, in research at in­ I stitutions not before visited, and in generous help from many people every time my ignorance blocked progress. I The highlight in accomplishing the research was being associated with Historian Jerome A. Greene, Denver Service Center. Jerry was assigned a research project concerning the Allies at Yorktown. We I coordinated our research, acquired a common pool of historic maps, visited some libraries together, and exchanged data from other institu­ tions. His competence, tact, understanding of my obstinateness, and gentle wit raised my spirits when they fell down. His innate friendli­ I ness and courtesy paved the way for us on many occasions when meeting the custodians of the resources. This joint undertaking was a re­ I warding experience that I shall not forget. Supervisory Historian John F. Luzader, Denver Service Center, not only supplied primary documents from his collection of German material but also took time to translate them. He also patiently answered all I my questions concerning the American Revolution, of which he is master. Editor Linda Greene, Historic Preservation, had a particularly difficult task in encouraging me, with grace and good humor, to conform my meth­ I odology to the Chicago Manual of Style. Considering my fossilization after eleven years with another style, she deserves sympathy and my thanks. Also, my appreciation goes to Robert H. Todd, Division of I Graphics, Denver Service Center, who drew the many maps in this report in a superb manner. The Division of Graphics is responsible for the fine visual appearance of this study. I Working at Colonial National Historical Park was attended by unusual circumstances. Because the visitor center complex was being I enlarged and remodeled while I was there, I was required to wear a I iii I I hardhat while delving into the history files. Because the building is located within the area defended by the British, the noise of jackham­ I ) mers gave me an inkling of the cannonading that Cornwallis's men en­ dured. Regardless, my appreciation for generous help is extended to the three Jameses: Superintendent Sullivan, Chief Historian Hasket, I I and Park Historian Gott. My thanks also go to Ranger Laura Feller for her translation of a French journal of the siege. The archeological investigation and historical research on York­ I town presently being undertaken by the Southside Historical Sites Found­ ation, Williamsburg, are important additions to our knowledge of the siege. Moreover, the ideas and concepts generated by this group of researchers are a stimulus to the study of the fortifications. Thanks I go to Director of Research Norman Barka, Edward Ayers, Arthur Barnes, and Edward McManus. I A considerable number of historical societies, libraries, and museums fully extended their services and made all their resources available for the purposes of this study. On several occasions, when I machines broke down and so forth, these institutions went to extra­ ordinary lengths to insure that the materials were made available in time. My acknowledgements and thanks are due to the following: ~Irs. Gertrude A. Fisher, Massachusetts Historical Society, Boston; Edward M. I Riley, Mrs. Nancy Merz, and Mrs. Linda Rowe, The Colonial Williamsburg Foundation, Virginia; John L. Lochhead, The Mariners Museum, Newport News, Virginia; Miss J. Miller, Casemate Museum, and Mrs. Thomas, TRADOC I Library, U.S. Army Continental Command, both at Fort Monroe, Virginia; Edward B. Russell and John M. Dervan, U.S. Army Engineer Museum, Fort Belvoir, Virginia; Mrs. Lucy Hrivnak, The Historical Society of Pennsyl­ vania, Philadelphia; Mrs. Mary A. Thompson, Paul Mellon Collection, Oak I Spring, Upperville, Virginia; John S. Aubrey, Newberry Library, Chicago; William S. Dix and Mrs. Agnes B. Sherman, Princeton University Library, New Jersey; Richard Boulind, The John Carter Brown Library, Brown Uni­ I versity, Providence, Rhode Island; Virginia State Library, Richmond; Mrs. Lois B. McCauley, Maryland Historical Society, Baltimore; A. Modelski and Jeffery Clark, Geography and Map Division, The Library of I Congress, Alexandria, Virginia; Gary Morgan, Map Division, the National Archives, Washington, D.C.; Map Information Service, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia; and the University of Colorado Library, Boulder, and the Denver Public Library, Colorado. I I am particularly indebted to Mr. Joseph P. Tustin, Tuckerton, New Jersey. Mr. Tustin has in his possession the unpublished diary of Capt. I Johann Ewald, Jagers, who had much to say on the British defenses at Yorktown. He has edited this important account and, despite its being on the eve of publication, made generous portions of it available for the benefit of Yorktown. A special thanks is due also to the William L. Clements Library, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Director Howard N. Peckham, Curators I I iv I I John Dann (Manuscripts) and Douglas W. Marshall (Maps), Assistant Curator Arlene Kleeb, and the entire staff did everything possible to make our I visit there both comfortable and profitable. The riches in the Sir Henry Clinton papers were indispensable for the purposes of this report. I In the text and in the bibliography of this study,note is made of the important research that has already been accomplished by National Park Service people who have been assigned to Colonial NHP over the years. Needless to stress, this body of work was of critical importance to the study. My thanks are due also to the nameless NPS people who have con­ tributed their time and talents toward the creation and management of the history files and of the excellent research library at the park. Last, but most important of all, my gratitude goes to Lael Cleys, who took my handwritten draft and transformed it into a legible document. I I I I I I I I I I v I I I I TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE I • • I o o o o o o , o o iii I. CORNWALLIS COMES TO YORKTOWN 1 I II. YORKTOWN AND GLOUCESTER POINT: EARLY HISTORY 7 A. Yorktown 7 I B. Gloucester Point 10 III. THE BRITISH FORTIFY, AUGUST 1781 11 I A. Cornwallis Sails to Yorktown 11 B. Patrols 13 c. Lafayette Moves 15 D. Fortifying the Posts 15 I E. French Fleet Arrives 19 I IV. THE BRITISH ARMY AT YORKTOWN 23 A. Strength . 23 B. The Units ..... 27 1. British, General. 27 I 2. 17th Regiment of Foot 28 3. 23d Regiment of Foot 28 4. 33d Regiment"of Foot 29 I 5. 43d Regiment of Foot 29 6. ?1st Regiment of Foot 29 7. 76th Regiment of Foot 30 I 8. 80th Regiment of Foot 30 9. 1st and 2d Light Infantry Battalions 31 10. Royal Artillery . 31 11. Royal Engineers ... 31 I 12. German Units, General 32 13. Anspach Battalions 32 14. Fusilier Regiment Erbprinz 32 I 15. Musketeer Regiment von Bose 32 16. Jagers ......... 33 17. German Arti 11 ery . 33 18. British Legion, Provincial 33 I 19. Queen's Rangers, Provincial 33 I 20. Royal Navy ....... 34 I vii I I V. A MONTH OF GRACE, SEPTEMBER 1781. 37 A. Cornwallis's Decisions 37 I B. Military Activities. 38 C. The Allies Gather. 40 D. Fire Ships 42 I VI. THE DEFENSES OF YORKTOWN AND GLOUCESTER 45 I A. Siege Warfare: Theory and Practice 45 1. De Vauban 45 2. John Muller 47 3. A Good Defense 48 I 4. Construction of Fortifications. 54 a) Artillery: Penetration and Range. 55 b) Trace 56 I c) Rampart/Parapet. 56 d) En barbette and Embrasures 57 e) Platforms 58 I f) Sodding 59 g) Ditches 59 h) Palisades 60 i) Fraises. 60 I j) Abatis 61 k) Outworks 62 1) Gabions, Fascines, Saucissons, and Hurdles 63 I B. The Defenses of Gloucester Point 67 C. The Defenses of Yorktown 70 1. Fusiliers' Redoubt. 76 I 2. Outposts, Windmi 11 Point, etc .. 78 3. Main Defenses, Western Yorktown 78 4. Main Defenses, Eastern Yorktown 81 5. Hornwork. 83 I 6. Water Batteries 83 7. Interior Works 84 8. Magazines 84 I 9. Hospital ( s) 85 10. Cemeteries 85 11.
Recommended publications
  • Nomination Form
    UPS Form 10-WO LRI 16. tucr-uul (Oct. 1990) United States Doparbent of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM I. Name of Property ---. - ----I- ---. historic name Dam Number One Battlefield Site other namesfsite number -Lee's Mill Battlefield; Newport News Park; VDIiR File No. 121-60 ------ ---- -- -- ----.--. 2. Location --- -------- - ----.--. street & number- 13560 Jefferson Avenue not for publication x city or town -Newport News vicinity N/f state Virginia code OA county Newport News (independent code 700 zip code 2360. citvl -- -- - .- - - - 3. State/Federal Agency Certification - - - - - - - - - As the designated authority uder the National Historic Preservatim Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this -x- nminati request for determination of eligibility wets the doc-tatim standards for registering prowrties in the NatimaI Register -Historic Places and meets the procedural ard professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my Opinion, the Property -x - mets does mt imt the National Register Criteria. I recumem that this property be considerea significant - nationai -x - staten=- locally. ( - See cmtimation sheet for additimal camnents.) '.L- ,!-;'&,; <. ,- -/ - L : -. , . ,, flk'~- c. ' -. Sfgnature -of certifying official/Title Date , > L..fl. -, ,J , -..., ,.-.-<: ,LA- ,,,,: L ',' /.. / 2:1 L ,i.&~&.~/,/,s 0*A: i 2.74 ," - .- .-- L, ,, Virginia Department of Historic Resources State or Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the pro~erty- meets - does not meet tne Nationai Register critsia. ( See cmtiowrim sheet for addiricnai cmrs.) signature of carmenring or omer official Dare State or FederaL agency am bureau -------- --------------- --------------- ------- ------------- --4. National Park Service-------------------- Certification ------------- ----------- I, hereby certify that this property is: entered in the Naticnal Register - See cmtirrJarion sheet.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Deprived of Their Liberty'
    'DEPRIVED OF THEIR LIBERTY': ENEMY PRISONERS AND THE CULTURE OF WAR IN REVOLUTIONARY AMERICA, 1775-1783 by Trenton Cole Jones A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland June, 2014 © 2014 Trenton Cole Jones All Rights Reserved Abstract Deprived of Their Liberty explores Americans' changing conceptions of legitimate wartime violence by analyzing how the revolutionaries treated their captured enemies, and by asking what their treatment can tell us about the American Revolution more broadly. I suggest that at the commencement of conflict, the revolutionary leadership sought to contain the violence of war according to the prevailing customs of warfare in Europe. These rules of war—or to phrase it differently, the cultural norms of war— emphasized restricting the violence of war to the battlefield and treating enemy prisoners humanely. Only six years later, however, captured British soldiers and seamen, as well as civilian loyalists, languished on board noisome prison ships in Massachusetts and New York, in the lead mines of Connecticut, the jails of Pennsylvania, and the camps of Virginia and Maryland, where they were deprived of their liberty and often their lives by the very government purporting to defend those inalienable rights. My dissertation explores this curious, and heretofore largely unrecognized, transformation in the revolutionaries' conduct of war by looking at the experience of captivity in American hands. Throughout the dissertation, I suggest three principal factors to account for the escalation of violence during the war. From the onset of hostilities, the revolutionaries encountered an obstinate enemy that denied them the status of legitimate combatants, labeling them as rebels and traitors.
    [Show full text]
  • From August, 1861, to November, 1862, with The
    P. R. L. P^IKCE, L I E E A E T. -42 4 5i f ' ' - : Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from The Institute of Museum and Library Services through an Indiana State Library LSTA Grant http://www.archive.org/details/followingflagfro6015coff " The Maine boys did not fire, but had a merry chuckle among themselves. Page 97. FOLLOWING THE FLAG. From August, 1861, to November, 1862, WITH THE ARMY OF THE POTOMAC. By "CARLETON," AUTHOR OF "MY DAYS AND NIGHTS ON THE BATTLE-FIELD.' BOSTON: TICKNOR AND FIELDS. 1865. Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1864, by CHARLES CARLETON COFFIN, in the Clerk's Office of the District Court for the District of Massachusetts. University Press: Welch, Bigelow, and Company, Cambridge. PREFACE. TT will be many years before a complete history -*- of the operations of the armies of the Union can be written ; but that is not a sufficient reason why historical pictures may not now be painted from such materials as have come to hand. This volume, therefore, is a sketch of the operations of the Army of the Potomac from August, 1861, to November, 1862, while commanded by Gener- al McOlellan. To avoid detail, the organization of the army is given in an Appendix. It has not been possible, in a book of this size, to give the movements of regiments ; but the narrative has been limited to the operations of brigades and di- visions. It will be comparatively easy, however, for the reader to ascertain the general position of any regiment in the different battles, by con- sulting the Appendix in connection with the narrative.
    [Show full text]
  • The American Revolution and the German Bürgertum's Reassessment of America Virginia Sasser Delacey Old Dominion University
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Institute for the Humanities Theses Institute for the Humanities Winter 2004 Johann August Weppen's Der Hessische Officer in Amerika and David Christoph Seybold's Reizenstein: The American Revolution and the German Bürgertum's Reassessment of America Virginia Sasser DeLacey Old Dominion University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/humanities_etds Part of the European History Commons, German Literature Commons, International Relations Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation DeLacey, Virginia S.. "Johann August Weppen's Der Hessische Officern i Amerika and David Christoph Seybold's Reizenstein: The American Revolution and the German Bürgertum's Reassessment of America" (2004). Master of Arts (MA), thesis, Humanities, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/k7es-1t13 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/humanities_etds/18 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Institute for the Humanities at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Institute for the Humanities Theses by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JOHANN AUGUST WEPPEN'S DER HESSISCHE OFFICIER IN AMER/KA AND DAVID CHRISTOPH SEYBOLD'S REIZENSTEIN: THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION AND THE GERMAN BURGERTUM'S REASSESSMENT OF AMERICA by Virginia Sasser DeLacey B.A. May 1979, Duke University B.S. December 1985, University of Maryland A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS HUMANITIES OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY December 2004 Approved by: Jeffrey H. Richards (Director) Jane T.
    [Show full text]
  • “Extracts from Some Rebel Papers”: Patriots, Loyalists, and the Perils of Wartime Printing
    1 “Extracts from some Rebel Papers”: Patriots, Loyalists, and the Perils of Wartime Printing Joseph M. Adelman National Endowment for the Humanities Fellow American Antiquarian Society Presented to the Joint Seminar of the McNeil Center for Early American Studies And the Program in Early American Economy and Society, LCP Library Company of Philadelphia, 1314 Locust Street, Philadelphia 24 February 2012 3-5 p.m. *** DRAFT: Please do not cite, quote, or distribute without permission of the author. *** 2 The eight years of the Revolutionary War were difficult for the printing trade. After over a decade of growth and increasing entanglement among printers as their networks evolved from commercial lifelines to the pathways of political protest, the fissures of the war dispersed printers geographically and cut them off from their peers. Maintaining commercial success became increasingly complicated as demand for printed matter dropped, except for government printing, and supply shortages crippled communications networks and hampered printers’ ability to produce and distribute anything that came off their presses. Yet even in their diminished state, printers and their networks remained central not only to keeping open lines of communication among governments, armies, and civilians, but also in shaping public opinion about the central ideological issues of the war, the outcomes of battles, and the meaning of events affecting the war in North America and throughout the Atlantic world. What happened to printers and their networks is of vital importance for understanding the Revolution. The texts that historians rely on, from Common Sense and The Crisis to rural newspapers, almanacs, and even diaries and correspondence, were shaped by the commercial and political forces that printers navigated as they produced printed matter that defined the scope of debate and the nature of the discussion about the war.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Weather on Armies During the American War of Independence, 1775-1781 Jonathan T
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2011 The Force of Nature: The Impact of Weather on Armies during the American War of Independence, 1775-1781 Jonathan T. Engel Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES THE FORCE OF NATURE: THE IMPACT OF WEATHER ON ARMIES DURING THE AMERICAN WAR OF INDEPENDENCE, 1775-1781 By JONATHAN T. ENGEL A Thesis submitted to the Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Degree Awarded: Spring Semester, 2011 The members of the committee approve the thesis of Jonathan T. Engel defended on March 18, 2011. __________________________________ Sally Hadden Professor Directing Thesis __________________________________ Kristine Harper Committee Member __________________________________ James Jones Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members. ii This thesis is dedicated to the glory of God, who made the world and all things in it, and whose word calms storms. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Colonies may fight for political independence, but no human being can be truly independent, and I have benefitted tremendously from the support and aid of many people. My advisor, Professor Sally Hadden, has helped me understand the mysteries of graduate school, guided me through the process of earning an M.A., and offered valuable feedback as I worked on this project. I likewise thank Professors Kristine Harper and James Jones for serving on my committee and sharing their comments and insights.
    [Show full text]
  • Environment and Culture in the Northeastern Americas During the American Revolution Daniel S
    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fogler Library Spring 5-11-2019 Navigating Wilderness and Borderland: Environment and Culture in the Northeastern Americas during the American Revolution Daniel S. Soucier University of Maine, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd Part of the Canadian History Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Military History Commons, Nature and Society Relations Commons, Other History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Soucier, Daniel S., "Navigating Wilderness and Borderland: Environment and Culture in the Northeastern Americas during the American Revolution" (2019). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 2992. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/2992 This Open-Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NAVIGATING WILDERNESS AND BORDERLAND: ENVIRONMENT AND CULTURE IN THE NORTHEASTERN AMERICAS DURING THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION By Daniel S. Soucier B.A. University of Maine, 2011 M.A. University of Maine, 2013 C.A.S. University of Maine, 2016 A THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (in History) The Graduate School University of Maine May, 2019 Advisory Committee: Richard Judd, Professor Emeritus of History, Co-Adviser Liam Riordan, Professor of History, Co-Adviser Stephen Miller, Professor of History Jacques Ferland, Associate Professor of History Stephen Hornsby, Professor of Anthropology and Canadian Studies DISSERTATION ACCEPTANCE STATEMENT On behalf of the Graduate Committee for Daniel S.
    [Show full text]
  • Forgotten Heroes Among Us: Francis J. Kiernan and the 40Th NY Volunteer Infantry
    Forgotten Heroes Among Us: Francis J. Kiernan and the 40th NY Volunteer Infantry By Patrick Arthur Patterson January 11, 2018 - 1 - - 2 - Topics: American Civil War – Virginia & Pennsylvania History of the 40th New York Volunteer Infantry Irish Immigration New York History Elmira, NY – Civil War Prison Camp Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania History All rights Reserved. Copyright © 2018 Patrick A. Patterson, use with permission. - 3 - “To my comrades who sacrificed their lives that their country might live.” Fred C. Floyd1 While searching for one of my wife’s ancestors in St. Joseph’s Cemetery, West View, Allegheny, PA2 some time ago [located at 101-199 Bellevue Rd., Pittsburgh, PA 15229], I came across a grave plot for Francis J. Kiernan with a wonderful monument to the 40th New York Volunteer Infantry. On the monument were listed all of the major engagements the 40th NY Infantry had fought during the US Civil War.3 The 40th New York was in almost all of the major Civil War engagements in the north east surrounding Washington, D.C, Virginia and Pennsylvania. Buried next to Francis Kiernan, Sr., were his sons Francis J. Kiernan, Jr. and Robert Emmet Kiernan. The senior Kiernan’s stone reflected he was born in Ireland and his two sons were born in Pennsylvania.4 5 I thought what wonderful stories Mr. Kiernan could have told of his history and that of the terrible conflict he took part in and survived. I had to find out more about him. Francis J. Kiernan, Sr. was born in County Longford, Ireland [b. 15 Aug 1841 - d.
    [Show full text]
  • Fortification Renaissance: the Roman Origins of the Trace Italienne
    FORTIFICATION RENAISSANCE: THE ROMAN ORIGINS OF THE TRACE ITALIENNE Robert T. Vigus Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2013 APPROVED: Guy Chet, Committee Co-Chair Christopher Fuhrmann, Committee Co-Chair Walter Roberts, Committee Member Richard B. McCaslin, Chair of the Department of History Mark Wardell, Dean of the Toulouse Graduate School Vigus, Robert T. Fortification Renaissance: The Roman Origins of the Trace Italienne. Master of Arts (History), May 2013, pp.71, 35 illustrations, bibliography, 67 titles. The Military Revolution thesis posited by Michael Roberts and expanded upon by Geoffrey Parker places the trace italienne style of fortification of the early modern period as something that is a novel creation, borne out of the minds of Renaissance geniuses. Research shows, however, that the key component of the trace italienne, the angled bastion, has its roots in Greek and Roman writing, and in extant constructions by Roman and Byzantine engineers. The angled bastion of the trace italienne was yet another aspect of the resurgent Greek and Roman culture characteristic of the Renaissance along with the traditions of medicine, mathematics, and science. The writings of the ancients were bolstered by physical examples located in important trading and pilgrimage routes. Furthermore, the geometric layout of the trace italienne stems from Ottoman fortifications that preceded it by at least two hundred years. The Renaissance geniuses combined ancient bastion designs with eastern geometry to match a burgeoning threat in the rising power of the siege cannon. Copyright 2013 by Robert T. Vigus ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis would not have been possible without the assistance and encouragement of many people.
    [Show full text]
  • Route 10 (Bermuda Triangle Road to Meadowville Road) Widening Project VDOT Project Number 0010-020-632, (UPC #101020) (VDHR File No
    Route 10 (Bermuda Triangle Road to Meadowville Road) Widening Project VDOT Project Number 0010-020-632, (UPC #101020) (VDHR File No. 1995-2174) Phase I Architectural Identification Survey Chesterfield County, Virginia Phase I Archaeological Identification Survey for the Route 10 Project (Bermuda Triangle to Meadowville) Chesterfield County, Virginia VDOT Project No. 0010-020-632, UPC #101020 Prepared for: Prepared for: Richmond District Department of Transportation 2430VDOT Pine Richmond Forest Drive District Department of Transportation 9800 Government Center Parkway Colonial2430 Heights, Pine Forest VA Drive23834 9800 Government Center Parkway Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Colonial804 Heights,-524-6000 Virginia 23834 Chesterfield, VA 23832 804-748-1037 Prepared by: March 2013 Prepared by: McCormick Taylor, Inc. North Shore Commons A 4951 McCormickLake Brook Drive, Taylor Suite 275 NorthGlen ShoreAllen, VirginiaCommons 23060 A 4951 Lake Brook Drive, Suite 275 Glen Allen, VA 23060 May 2013 804-762-5800 May 2013 Route 10 (Bermuda Triangle Road to Meadowville Road) Widening Project VDOT Project Number 0010-020-632, (UPC #101020) (VDHR File No. 1995-2174) Phase I Architectural Identification Survey Phase I ArchaeologicalChesterfield County,Identification Virginia Survey for the Route 10 Project (Bermuda Triangle to Meadowville) Chesterfield County, Virginia VDOT Project No. 0010-020-632, UPC #101020 Prepared for: Prepared for: Richmond District Department of Transportation 2430VDOT Pine Richmond Forest Drive District Department of Transportation 9800 Government Center Parkway Colonial2430 Heights, Pine Forest VA Drive23834 9800 Government Center Parkway Chesterfield, Virginia 23832 Colonial804 Heights,-524-6000 Virginia 23834 Chesterfield, VA 23832 804-748-1037 Prepared by: March 2013 Prepared by: McCormick Taylor NorthMcCormick Shore Commons Taylor, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • 1812; the War, and Its Moral : a Canadian Chronicle
    '^^ **7tv»* ^^ / ^^^^T^\/ %*^-'%p^ ^<>.*^7^\/ ^o^*- "o /Vi^/\ co^i^^.% Atii^/^-^^ /.' .*'% y A-^ ; .O*^ . <f,r*^.o^" X'^'^^V %--f.T*\o^^ V^^^^\<^ •^ 4.^ tri * -0 a5 «4q il1 »"^^ 11E ^ ^ THE WAR, AND ITS MORAL CANADIAN CHRONICLE. BY WILLIAM F?"C0FFIN, Esquire, FORMERLT SHERIFF OF THE DISTRICT OF MONTREAI,, LIEUT.-COLONKL, STAFF, ACIITB POROB, CANADA, AND H. M. AGENT FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF THE ORDNANCE ESTATES, CANADA. PRINTED BY JOHN LOVELL, ST. NICHOLAS STREET. 1864. E354 C^y 2. Entered, according to the Act of the Provincial Parliament, in the year one thousand eight hundred and sixty-four, by William F. Coffin, in the OfBce of the Registrar of the Province of Canada. Ea t\}t J^igfjt pjonourable ^ir (SbmtmtJ SSalhtr f cab, iarond, ^er Pajtstg's Post '§ononmbk ^ribg Council, ^nU late ffiobernor ©cneral anli C0mmanKcr4tt=(H;fjicf of IBxitislj Nortfj America, ©Ws (jrattatlinw (!>Uv0uicU 0f the ^m of I8I2 is rcspcctftillp tirtitcatEU, fig fjis fattfjful anU grateful .Scrfaant, WILLIAM P. COFFIN. Ottawa, 2nd January, 1864, TO THE RIGHT HONORABLE SIR EDMUND WALKER HEAD, BARONET. My dear Sir,—^I venture to appeal to your respected name as the best introduction for the little work which I" do myself the honour to dedicate to you. To you, indeed, it owes its existence. You conferred upon me the appointment I have the honour to hold under the Crown in Canada, and that appointment has given life to an idea, long cherished in embryo. The management of the Ordnance Lands in this Province has thrown me upon the scenes of the most notable events of the late war.
    [Show full text]
  • How the Americans Lost the Battle of Kekionga
    General Josiah Harmar’s Campaign Reconsidered: How the Americans Lost the Battle of Kekionga Michael S. Warner” Some jealousies took place, and reproaches ensued. Complaints, indeed, forever fol- low misfortune, as that is but too often the companion of misconduct. Humphrey Marshall, The History of Kentucky, 1812. General Josiah Harmar’s campaign against the “Indian ban- ditti” along the Maumee River in 1790 marks a watershed in the settlement of the Old Northwest and also in the evolution of Amer- ica’s military institutions. His expedition, the Constitutional re- public’s first attempt to impose its will by offensive arms, initiated four years of warfare on the part of the federal government to halt Indian depredations on the Ohio frontier. It was one in a series of events that led to the Treaty of Greenville in 1795, to the abandon- ment by Great Britain of the forts still held on American soil, to expansion of the peacetime military establishment, and to the per- manent widening of the federal role in maintaining the nation’s security. Harmar’s campaign remains, paradoxically, both well known to scholars and in many ways not well understood. This state of affairs does not result from a dearth of information. Harmar’s con- temporaries could learn easily the outline of the campaign’s events and could infer from scattered but numerous clues the causes be- hind its failure. Since 1790 many more facts have come to light; yet, in spite of historians’ familiarity with the expedition, signifi- cant aspects of it are still unclear. The campaign’s climactic battle, for example, has never been accurately described and to this day remains nameless.
    [Show full text]