DOCSLIB.ORG

The AIC Painting Specialty Group POSTPRINTS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The AIC Painting Specialty Group POSTPRINTS VOLUME TWENTY-FOUR 2011 The American Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works The Paintings Specialty Group of the American Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works 2010-2011 Officers Chair Laura Rivers Program Chair Patricia Favero Secretary/Treasurer Dawn Rogala Nominating Committee Montserrat Le Mense, Chair Nicholas Dorman, and Joanna Dunn Listserv Moderator Chris Stavroudis Publications Chair Barbara Buckley Web Editor Christina Milton O’Connel The AIC Painting Specialty Group POSTPRINTS VOLUME TWENTY-FOUR 2011 Papers Presented at the 39th Annual Meeting of the American Institute for Conservation and Historic Works Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, May 31–June 3, 2011 Compiled by Barbara Buckley Layout by Meg Newburger Copyright © 2014 by the Paintings Specialty Group of the American Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works, 1156 15th St., NW, Suite 320, Washington DC 20005. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means with- out written permission of the American Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works. Publication of this serial began in 1988. Except for Volume 3 (1990) all issues until Volume 16 are unnumbered. Beginning with Volume 22, the title year will be the meeting year and not the pub- lication year. The papers presented in this publication entitled AIC Paintings Specialty Group Postprints, Volume Twenty-four, 2011 have not been edited and have not undergone a formal process of peer review. The publication is intended primarily for the members of the Paintings Specialty Group of the Ameri- can Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works. The Paintings Specialty Group is an approved division of the American Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works, but does not necessarily represent AIC policies or opinions. Opinions expressed in this publication are those of the contributors and not official statements of either the Paintings Specialty Group or the American Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works. Responsibility for the materials and methods described herein rests solely with the contributors. ISSN 2169-3919 Printed in the United States of America AIC PAINTINGS SPECIALTY GROUP POSTPRINTS VOLUME 24 2011 ANNUAL MEETING Papers Presented at the 39th Annual Meeting of the American Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, May 31–June 3, 2011 PAINTINGS SPECIALTY GROUP June 2, 2011 Giovanni Antonio Boltraffio’s Madonna and Child in the Context of Leonardo da Vinci’s Studio Practice Sue Ann Chui and Alan Phenix ...............................................................................................................................................1 A Neoclassical Mystery: The Technical Study and Treatment of an Iconic French Portrait (Abstract) Kristin Deghetaldi and Kathryn Morales ................................................................................................................................13 A Comparison of the Pigments Mentioned in Delacroix’s Diary with Those Found in the Oil Sketch and Final Version of Bacchus and Ariadne (Abstract) Narayan Khandekar, Sarah Kianovsky, and Katherine Eremin ..................................................................................................14 Attributed to Henri Rousseau: The Technical Examination of La Sainte Famille Katrina A. Bartlett .................................................................................................................................................................16 When You Come to a Fork in the Road, Take It: Two Directions for the Conservation of an Anselm Kiefer Per Knutås ............................................................................................................................................................................31 Choices Post-Mortem in Joan Mitchell’s Work: Cropping Paintings Mary Gridley ........................................................................................................................................................................37 PAINTINGS SPECIALTY GROUP June 3, 2011 A Soluble Problem: Morse’s The Gallery of The Louvre, Glazing, and Toning Lance Mayer and Gay Myers..................................................................................................................................................53 An Experimental Study on the Merits of Virtual Cleaning of Paintings (Abstract) John K. Delaney, Damon Conover, Mathieu Thourya, Ken Fleisher, E. René De La Rie, M. Picollo, Andrea Casini, Lionel Simonot, and Muriel Vervat .........................................................................................................................................61 The Construction and Reconstruction of a Spanish Retable Judy Dion .............................................................................................................................................................................62 Industrial Literature as a Resource in Modern Materials Conservation: Zinc Oxide House Paint as a Case Study Dawn V. Rogala .....................................................................................................................................................................78 The Salmagundi Palette Collection Alexander W. Katlan ............................................................................................................................................................92 AIC Paintings Specialty Group Postprints 24 (2011) The Long-term Relationship between a Museum Collection and Contracted Conservator Explored through the Treatment of Spring Turning by Grant Wood Ruth Barach Cox ..................................................................................................................................................................97 Raman Revealed: A Shared Internet Resource for the Cultural Heritage Community Suzanne Quillen Lomax, Beth A. Price, Charles Davis, Boris Pretzel, Marcello Picollo, And Ryan Grieb ................................107 Speed, Precision, and a Lighter Load: Metigo MAP 3.0, a Great Advancement in Condition Mapping for Large-Scale Projects Emily Macdonald-Korth .....................................................................................................................................................115 Microclimate and Anoxic Frames (Abstract) Judith Bannerman, Zane Cunningham, Amanda Heath, Mark Underhill, and Joyce H. Townsend ...........................................120 A Cleaning Application of Poly (Vinyl Alcohol-Co-Acetate)/ Borate Gel-Like Dispersions on Multiple Views by Stuart Davis Lora V. Angelova, Kristin R. deGhetaldi, Christopher A. Maines, Richard G. Weiss, and Barbara H. Berrie...............................121 Developing Cleaning Systems for Water-Sensitive Paints By Adjusting pH and Conductivity Tiarna Doherty, Chris Stavroudis, and Jennifer Hickey .........................................................................................................125 STUDIO TIPS SESSION ...................................................................................................................................................136 Studio Tip: Slim Light for Use in Painting Conservation Barbara A. Ramsay ..............................................................................................................................................................136 Studio Tip: Do It Yourself Snakes: Easy, Versatile, Skinny Bag Weights for Conservation Use Montserrat Le Mense and Gabriel Dunn ..............................................................................................................................138 Studio Tip: Rottenstone For In-Painting Montserrat Le Mense and Gabriel Dunn ..............................................................................................................................142 Studio Tip: Don’t Panic: Use HITS: K-12 Conservation Outreach Erin L. Kelly .......................................................................................................................................................................144 Studio Tip: How to Make an iphone Microscope Camera Ana Alba .............................................................................................................................................................................147 Studio Tip: Customized Fume Extraction Hoods Dean Yoder .........................................................................................................................................................................148 AIC Paintings Specialty Group Postprints 24 (2011) sue ann chui and alan phenix Giovanni Antonio Boltraffio’s Madonna and Child in the Context of Leonardo da Vinci’s Studio Practice ABSTRACT As part of a conservation partnership with the Szépmüvészeti Múzeum, Budapest, Hungary, the Madonna and Child attributed to Giovanni Antonio Boltraffio came to the J. Paul Getty Museum in May 2008 for treatment and study. This paper will present aspects of the conservation and restoration treatment of the Madonna and Child, and review results obtained from the technical study done in collaboration with the Getty Conservation Institute that includes infrared reflectography, x-radiography, and analysis of paint cross- sections. Some of the notable findings in the Madonna and Child are evidence to the direct use
Recommended publications

  • Illustrations of Selected Works in the Various National Sections of The

    SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION libraries 390880106856C A«T FALACr CttNTRAL. MVIIION "«VTH rinKT OFFICIAI ILLUSTRATIONS OF SELECTED WORKS IN THE VARIOUS NATIONAL SECTIONS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ART WITH COMPLETE LIST OF AWARDS BY THE INTERNATIONAL JURY UNIVERSAL EXPOSITION ST. LOUIS, 1904 WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY HALSEY C. IVES, CHIEF OF THE DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTIVE TEXT FOR PAINTINGS BY CHARLES M. KURTZ, Ph.D., ASSISTANT CHIEF DESCRIPTIVE TEXT FOR SCULPTURES BY GEORGE JULIAN ZOLNAY, superintendent of sculpture division Copyr igh r. 1904 BY THE LOUISIANA PURCHASE EXPOSITION COMPANY FOR THE OFFICIAL CATALOGUE COMPANY EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ART Department ' B’’ of the Division of Exhibits, FREDERICK J. V. SKIFF, Director of Exhibits. HALSEY C. IVES, Chief. CHARLES M. KURTZ, Assistant Chief. GEORGE JULIAN ZOLNAY, Superintendent of the Division of Sculpture. GEORGE CORLISS, Superintendent of Exhibit Records. FREDERIC ALLEN WHITING, Superintendent of the Division of Applied Arts. WILL H. LOW, Superintendent of the Loan Division. WILLIAM HENRY FOX Secretary. INTRODUCTION BY Halsey C. Ives “All passes; art alone enduring stays to us; I lie bust outlasts the throne^ the coin, Tiberius.” A I an early day after the opening of the Exposition, it became evident that there was a large class of visitors made up of students, teachers and others, who desired a more extensive and intimate knowledge of individual works than could be gained from a cursory view, guided by a conventional catalogue. 11 undreds of letters from persons especially interested in acquiring intimate knowledge of the leading char¬ acteristics of the various schools of expression repre¬ sented have been received; indeed, for two months be¬ fore the opening of the department, every mail carried replies to such letters, giving outlines of study, courses of reading, and advice to intending visitors.
  • Catalogo Leonardo

    Catalogo Leonardo

    LEONARDO DA VINCI OIL PAINTING REPRODUCTION ARTI FIORENTINE FIRENZE ITALY There is no artist more legendary than Leonardo. In the whole History of Art, no other name has created more discussions, debates and studies than the genius born in Vinci in 1452. Self-Portrait, 1515 Red Chalk on paper 33.3 x 21.6 cm. Biblioteca Reale Torino As far as we know, this extraordinary dra- wing is the only surviving self-portrait by the master. The Annunciation, 1474 tempera on panel 98 X 217 cm. Galleria degli Uffizi THE BATTLE OF ANGHIARI The Battle of Anghiari is a lost painting by Leonardo da Vinci. This is the finest known copy of Leonardo’s lost Battle of Anghiari fresco. It was made in the mid-16th century and then extended at the edges in the early 17th century by Rubens. The Benois Madonna, 1478 Oil on canvas 49.5x33 cm Hermitage Museum Originally painted on wood, It was transferred to canvas when It entered the Hermitage, during which time it was severely demaged GOLD LEAF FRAME DETAIL Woman Head, 1470-76 La Scapigliata, 1508 Paper 28 x 20 cm Oil on canvas 24.7 x 21 cm Galleria degli Uffizi Firenze Parma Galleria Nazionale Lady with an ermine, 1489-90 Oil on wood panel 54 x 39 cm Czartoryski Museum The subject of the portrait is identified as Cecilia Gallerani and was probably painted at a time when she was the mi- stress of Lodovico Sforza, Duke of Milan, and Leonardo was in the service of the Duke. Carved gold frame Ritratto di una sforza, 1495 Uomo vitruviano, 1490 Gesso e inchistro su pergamena Matita e inchiostro su carta 34x24 cm.
  • 3 LEONARDO Di Strinati Tancredi ING.Key

    3 LEONARDO Di Strinati Tancredi ING.Key

    THE WORKS OF ART IN THE AGE OF DIGITAL REPRODUCTION THE THEORETICAL BACKGROUND The Impossible Exhibitions project derives from an instance of cultural democracy that has its precursors in Paul Valéry, Walter Benjamin and André Malraux. The project is also born of the awareness that in the age of the digital reproducibility of the work of art, the concepts of safeguarding and (cultural and economic) evaluation of the artistic patrimony inevitably enter not only the work as itself, but also its reproduction: “For a hundred years here, as soon as the history of art has escaped specialists, it has been the history of what can be photographed” (André Malraux). When one artist's work is spread over various museums, churches and private collections in different continents, it becomes almost impossible to mount monograph exhibitions that give a significant overall vision of the great past artist's work. It is even harder to create great exhibitions due to the museum directors’ growing – and understandable – unwillingness to loan the works, as well as the exorbitant costs of insurance and special security measures, which are inevitable for works of incalculable value. Impossible Exhibitions start from these premises. Chicago, Loyola University Museum of Art, 2005 Naples, San Domenico Maggiore, 2013/2014 THE WORKS OF ART IN THE AGE OF DIGITAL REPRODUCTION THE PROJECT In a single exhibition space, Impossible Exhibitions present a painter's entire oeuvre in the form of very high definition reproductions, making use of digital technology permitting reproductions that fully correspond to the original works. Utmost detail resolution, the rigorously 1:1 format (Leonardo's Last Supper reproduction occupies around 45 square meters!), the correct print tone – certified by a renowned art scholar – make these reproductions extraordinarily close to the originals.
  • Destructive Pigment Characterization

    Destructive Pigment Characterization

    Looking for common fingerprints in Leonardo’s pupils through non- destructive pigment characterization LETIZIA BONIZZONI 1*, MARCO GARGANO 1, NICOLA LUDWIG 1, MARCO MARTINI 2, ANNA GALLI 2, 3 1 Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Milano, , via Celoria 16, 20133 Milano (Italy) 2 Dipartimento di Scienza dei Materiali, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, via R. Cozzi 55, 20125 Milano (Italy) and INFN, Sezione Milano-Bicocca. 3 CNR-IFN,piazza L. da Vinci, 20132 Milano (Italy). *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Non-invasive, portable analytical techniques are becoming increasingly widespread for the study and conservation in the field of cultural heritage, proving that a good data handling, supported by a deep knowledge of the techniques themselves, and the right synergy can give surprisingly substantial results when using portable but reliable instrumentation. In this work, pigment characterization was carried out on twenty-one Leonardesque paintings applying in situ XRF and FORS analyses. In-depth data evaluation allowed to get information on the colour palette and the painting technique of the different authors and workshops. Particular attention was paid to green pigments (for which a deeper study of possible pigments and alterations was performed with FORS analyses), flesh tones (for which a comparison with available data from cross sections was made) and ground preparation. Keywords pXRF, FORS, pigments, Leonardo’s workshop, Italian Renaissance INTRODUCTION “Tristo è quel discepolo che non ava[n]za il suo maestro” - Poor is the pupil who does not surpass his master - Leonardo da Vinci, Libro di Pittura, about 1493 1. 1 The influence of Leonardo on his peers during his activity in Milan (1482-1499 and 1506/8-1512/3) has been deep and a multitude of painters is grouped under the name of leonardeschi , but it is necessary to distinguish between his direct pupils and those who adopted his manner, fascinated by his works even outside his circle.
  • 2006 Calvin Bibliography

    2006 Calvin Bibliography

    2006 Calvin Bibliography Compiled by Paul Fields I. Calvin's Life and Times A. Biography B. Cultural Context ­ Intellectual History C. Cultural Context ­ Social History D. Friends and Associates E. Polemical Relationships II. Calvin's Works A. Works and Selections B. Critique III. Calvin's Theology A. Overview B. Doctrine of God 1. Overview 2. Creation 3. Knowledge of God 4. Providence 5. Trinity C. Doctrine of Christ D. Doctrine of Salvation 1. Overview 2. Atonement 3. Deification 4. Faith 5. Justification 6. Predestination E. Doctrine of Humanity 1. Covenant 2. Grace 3. Image of God 4. Law 5. Natural Law 6. Soul 7. Free Will F. Doctrine of Christian Life 1. Angels 2. Piety 3. Prayer 4. Sanctification 5. Vows G. Ecclesiology 1. Overview 2. Discipline 3. Polity H. Worship 1. Overview 2. Buildings 3. Images 4. Liturgy 5. Mariology 6. Music 7. Preaching and Sacraments IV. Calvin and Social­Ethical Issues V. Calvin and Political Issues VI. Calvinism A. Theological Influence 1. Christian Life 2. Ecclesiology 3. Eschatology 4. Lord's Supper 5. Natural Law 6. Preaching 7. Predestination 8. Salvation 9. Worship B. Cultural Influence 1. Arts 2. Education 3. Literature 4. Printing C. Social, Economic, and Political Influence D. International Influence 1. Croatia 2. England 3. Europe 4. France 5. Germany 6. Hungary 7. Korea 8. Latin America 9. Netherlands 10. Poland 11. Scotland 12. United States E. Critique F. Book Reviews G. Bibliographies I. Calvin’s Life and Times A. Biography Cottret, Bernard. “Noms de lieux: Ignace de Loyola, Jean Calvin, John Wesley.” Études ​ Théologiques et Religieuses 80, no.
  • La Nature Morte Au Québec Et La Question Du Sujet En Art (1887-1907)

    La Nature Morte Au Québec Et La Question Du Sujet En Art (1887-1907)

    ANNIE D’AMOURS LA NATURE MORTE AU QUÉBEC ET LA QUESTION DU SUJET EN ART (1887-1907) Mémoire présenté à La Faculté des études supérieures de l’Université Laval Dans le cadre du programme de maîtrise en histoire de l’art Pour l’obtention du grade de maître ès arts (M.A.) FACULTÉ DES LETTRES UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL QUÉBEC 2005 © Annie d’Amours, 2005 Résumé La présente recherche porte sur le développement de la nature morte et sur la problématique du sujet en art au Québec de 1887 à 1907. En étudiant l’intérêt pour la représentation des e objets en peinture à la fin du XIX siècle, le texte identifie les conditions culturelles et sociales dans lesquelles un nombre important de natures mortes ont été réalisées. Par une analyse des thèmes et des langages formels suivie d’une étude sur la réception de la nature morte québécoise par la critique d’art francophone, sont mises à jour les différentes conceptions sur l’art éclairant en retour le contexte d’émergence de la nature morte. La question du sujet en art se présente alors comme l’élément clé permettant de comprendre l’émergence d’une relation dynamique entre les préoccupations propres au genre et celle du contexte artistique de l’époque. Didier Prioul Annie d’Amours Abstract The present research relates on the development of the still life and the subject in art problematic in Quebec from 1887 to 1907. By studying the interest for the representation of objects in painting at the end of the XIXth century, the text identifies the cultural and social conditions under which a significant number of still life were carried out.
  • Statutes and Ordinances of the University

    Statutes and Ordinances of the University

    CHAPTER IX FACULTIES, DEPARTMENTS, AND OTHER INSTITUTIONS UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF THE GENERAL BOARD The provisions contained in this Chapter are Regulations of the General Board GENERAL REGULATIONS FOR FACULTIES 1. There shall be a Faculty in respect of each of the subjects enumerated in the Schedule appended to these regulations. Preliminary 2. In October of every year, not later than the first day of Full Term, the Registrary shall publish a lists. preliminary list of the members of each Faculty. Objections. 3. Objections to the inclusion or omission of any name may be addressed to the Secretary of the Board of the Faculty concerned, and shall be decided by that Board subject to an appeal to the General Board. Any such decision of a Faculty Board or the General Board shall be communicated to the objector and to the Registrary forthwith. Corrected lists. 4. As early as possible in the Michaelmas Term each year, and in any case not later than 28 October, the Secretary of the Board of each Faculty shall send to the Registrary the names of persons who are members of the Faculty under Regulation 1(c) of the Regulations for Faculty Membership. Promulgation 5. On the fifth weekday of November the Registrary shall promulgate the lists of the Faculties, and of lists. the lists so promulgated shall constitute the several Faculties for the purpose of the annual meetings of Annual meetings. the Faculties. Those meetings shall be held after the sixth day and before the twenty-fifth day of November. Between the promulgation of the lists and the end of the academical year the Registrary shall not be required to ascertain or to notify any change that may occur in the membership of a Faculty.
  • Mona Lisa: a Comparative Evaluation of the Different Versions S

    Mona Lisa: a Comparative Evaluation of the Different Versions S

    ONA LISA: A COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THE MDIFFERENT VERSIONS AND THEIR COPIES Salvatore Lorusso* Dipartimento di Beni Culturali Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, Ravenna, Italy Andrea Natali Dipartimento di Beni Culturali Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, Ravenna, Italy Keywords: “Mona Lisa”, versions, copies 1. Introduction In a previous study [1], which included stylistic and diagnostic analyses, it was found that the oil painting on canvas “Mona Lisa with columns”, part of a private collection in a museum in St. Petersburg (Figure 1), is a copy of the “Mona Lisa” by Leonardo (Figure 2) dating to a period between 1590 and 1660. Noteworthy features include the good quality, readability and expressiveness emanating from the work, which presum- ably is of Nordic influence, specifically German-Flemish. Figure 1. Photograph in the visible of the painting “Mona Lisa with Columns”, St. Petersburg (oil on canvas 63.2 x 85.2 cm ) CONSERVATION SCIENCE IN CULTURAL HERITAGE * Corresponding author: [email protected] 57 Figure 2. The Louvre “Mona Lisa” More specifically, given the importance of the subject, which includes Leonardo’s well-known masterpiece, the conclusion that was reached in defining the above paint- ing a copy of the original, involved examining, from a methodological point of view, investigations carried out in 2004 on the Louvre “Mona Lisa” by the “Center for Re- search and Restoration of the Museums of France”, and published in “Au coeur de La Joconde – Léonard de Vinci Décodé”. This sequence of investigations – which were certainly not aimed at authentication – were examined together with those of the Na- tional Gallery in London, thus enabling comparisons to be made with other works by Leonardo [2-3].
  • A Finding Aid to the Henry Mosler Papers, 1856-1929, in the Archives of American Art

    A Finding Aid to the Henry Mosler Papers, 1856-1929, in the Archives of American Art

    A Finding Aid to the Henry Mosler Papers, 1856-1929, in the Archives of American Art Stephanie Ashley Funding for the processing and digitization of this collection was provided by the Joseph F. McCrindle Foundation and the Terra Foundation for American Art. May 02, 2012 Archives of American Art 750 9th Street, NW Victor Building, Suite 2200 Washington, D.C. 20001 https://www.aaa.si.edu/services/questions https://www.aaa.si.edu/ Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Biographical Note............................................................................................................. 2 Scope and Content Note................................................................................................. 2 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 3 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 3 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 5 Series 1: Biographical Materials, 1863-1892, 1921................................................. 5 Series 2: Letters, 1861-circa 1920........................................................................... 6 Series 3:
  • 53Rd International Congress on Medieval Studies

    53Rd International Congress on Medieval Studies

    53rd International Congress on Medieval Studies May 10–13, 2018 Medieval Institute College of Arts and Sciences Western Michigan University 1903 W. Michigan Ave. Kalamazoo, MI 49008-5432 wmich.edu/medieval 2018 i Table of Contents Welcome Letter iii Registration iv-v On-Campus Housing vi-vii Food viii-ix Travel x Driving and Parking xi Logistics and Amenities xii-xiii Varia xiv Off-Campus Accommodations vx Hotel Shuttle Routes xvi Hotel Shuttle Schedules xvii Campus Shuttles xviii Mailings xix Exhibits Hall xx Exhibitors xxi Plenary Lectures xxii Reception of the Classics in the Middle Ages Lecture xxiii Screenings xxiv Social Media xxv Advance Notice—2019 Congress xxvi The Congress: How It Works xxvii The Congress Academic Program xxviii-xxix Travel Awards xxx The Otto Gründler Book Prize xxxi Richard Rawlinson Center xxxii Center for Cistercian and Monastic Studies xxxiii M.A. Program in Medieval Studies xxxiv Medieval Institute Publications xxxv Endowment and Gift Funds xxxvi 2018 Congress Schedule of Events 1–192 Index of Sponsoring Organizations 193–198 Index of Participants 199–218 Floor Plans M-1 – M-9 List of Advertisers Advertising A-1 – A-36 Color Maps ii Dear colleagues, It’s a balmy 9 degrees here in Kalamazoo today, but I can’t complain—too much— because Kalamazoo will not feel the wrath of the “bomb cyclone” and polar vortex due to hit the East Coast later this week, the first week of 2018. Nonetheless, today in Kalamazoo, I long for spring and what it brings: the warmth of the weather, my colleagues and friends who will come in May to the International Congress on Medieval Studies.
  • A „Fekete Legenda” Árnyékában

    A „Fekete Legenda” Árnyékában

    AAA „FEKETE LEGENDA” ÁRNYÉKÁBAN SZTE BÖLCSÉSZETTUDOMÁNYI KAR TÖRTÉNETTUDOMÁNYI DOKTORI ISKOLA MODERNKORI TÖRTÉNETI PROGRAM PHD ÉRTEKEZÉSEK Farkas Pálma Adél A „FEKETE LEGENDA” ÁRNYÉKÁBAN SPANYOLORSZÁG ÉS AZ EGYESÜLT ÁLLAMOK KAPCSOLATA A KORABELI SAJTÓ TÜKRÉBEN MIGUEL PRIMO DE RIVERA DIKTATÚRÁJA IDEJÉN (1923–1930) Doktori értekezés Szeged, 2013 SZTE BÖLCSÉSZETTUDOMÁNYI KAR Történettudományi Doktori Iskola Modernkori Történeti Program PhD értekezések Szerkesztette: ANDERLE ÁDÁM Technikai szerkeszt ő: JENEY ZSUZSANNA © FARKAS PÁLMA ISBN: 978-963-306-184-8 Felel ős kiadó: J. NAGY LÁSZLÓ Szeged, 2013 Tartalomjegyzék El őszó....................................................................................................................7 Bevezetés ............................................................................................................17 Historiográfiai és forráskérdések ....................................................................17 A múlt lenyomata: a spanyolellenes „fekete legenda” .......................................33 A fekete legenda évszázadai ...........................................................................33 A „ fekete legenda” az Egyesült Államokban .................................................45 A spanyolellenes legenda árnyéka halványul?....................................................57 Spanyolország az észak-amerikai utazó irodalomban.....................................57 „Hispanománia” az észak-amerikai m űvészetekben és építészetben ............58 A fekete legenda ellenszere:
  • Leonardo Da Vinci: the Experience of Art

    Leonardo Da Vinci: the Experience of Art

    2019-2020 SEASON LOUVRE AUDITORIUM LEONARDO DA VINCI: THE EXPERIENCE OF ART FRIDAY 25 OCTOBER 2019 LEONARDO DA VINCI: THE EXPERIENCE OF ART SYMPOSIUM ORGANISED TO COINCIDE WITH THe “LEONARDO DA VINCI” EXHIBITION (IN THE HAll NAPOLÉON UNTIL 24 FEBRUARY 2020) In collaboration with the C2RMF, the CNRS, the E-RIHS and IPERION-CH Scientific and organising committee: Vincent Delieuvin, Musée du Louvre Louis Frank, Musée du Louvre Michel Menu, C2RMF Bruno Mottin, C2RMF Élisabeth Ravaud, C2RMF The Louvre’s Leonardo exhibition and recent unveiling of IPERION CH (Integrated Platform for the European Research Infrastructure On Cultural Heritage) provide the perfect opportunity to present the public with the latest findings of studies on Leonardo’s oeuvre. The fruit of ten years of research carried out across various institutions, these new discoveries will allow greater insight into Leonardo’s unparalleled technique. PROGRAMME 10 a.m. Introduction by Isabelle Pallot-Frossard, C2RMF, and Dominique de Font-Réaulx, Musée du Louvre Morning Chair: Vincent Delieuvin, Musée du Louvre 10:15 a.m. Leonardo’s science and encyclopedic models of his time by Carmen C. Bambach, Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York 10:45 a.m. Recent investigations into the Windsor Leonardos by Martin Clayton, Royal Collection Trust, Windsor Castle 2 11:15 a.m. Three “preparatory cartoons” attributed to Leonardo: the “Portrait of Isabella d’Este”, the “Nude Mona Lisa” and “Head of a Child in Three-Quarter View” by Bruno Mottin, C2RMF 11:45 a.m. Conservation techniques and the shortcomings of literary texts: Giorgio Vasari, a case study by Louis Frank, Musée du Louvre, and Leticia Leratti, painter and sculptor 12 p.m.