DOCSLIB.ORG

Aspect and Tense in Ancient Greek Introduction: in the Present Paper I Will Try to Give a Brief Overview of a Very Interesting R

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aspect and Tense in Ancient Greek Introduction: in the Present Paper I Will Try to Give a Brief Overview of a Very Interesting R !"#$%&%&!'(!ʹ!')*+,-!#&.!/+&)+!%&!'&,%+&-!01++23!'41%)-!ʹ!56*+17+,-!.%)-%&,-%4&! Aspect and Tense in Ancient Greek Introduction: In the present paper I will try to give a brief overview of a very interesting recent work concerning formal semantics approaches to ancient languages, namely Ancient Greek ± a dissertation ³$VSHFWLQ$QFLHQW Greek $VHPDQWLFDQDO\VLVRIWKHDRULVWDQGLPSHUIHFWLYH´E\ Corien Bary (2009) . The aim of the thesis is to show that, despite the fact that there are no native speakers, Ancient Greek provides a large variety of problems that deserves to be treated in a PRGHUQVHPDQWLFVZD\DQGPRUHRYHUJLYHVDJRRGRSSRUWXQLW\RI³EHWD-WHVW´for every theory of aspect which claims to be consistent. Now let me make explicit the contents of my overview. First of all, I will give the aspectual system of Ancient Greek and its relation with tense system. Then I will focus on different interpretations of Aorist and Imperfect. Furthermore, I will describe various approaches to the theory of aspect developed in the formal semantics framework and show how the author applies them to Ancient Greek data. And at the end of the work I will make a conclusion with the basic ideas and innovations of the present dissertation. Ancient G reek Aspect System Ancient Greek has three aspects: aoristic, imperfective, and perfect aspect. the opposition between aoristic and imperfective aspect is realised throughout the verbal paradigm. Table 1.1 gives an overview of the imperfective and aoristic forms of the verb OXHLQµWRORRVHQ¶ - eis a past tense marker; -58 -sa is a marker for aoristic aspect. Finite indicative (past tense) İȜȣȠȞc(eluon), İȜȣıĮc(elusa) Subjunctive: ȜȣȦ (OXĀR), ȜȣıȦ (OXVĀR). Optative: ȜȣȠȚȝȚ (luoimi), ȜȣıĮȚȝȚ (lusaimi). Imperative: Ȝȣİ (lue), ȜȣıȠȞ (luson). Nonfinite participle: ȜȣȦȞ (OXĀRQ), ȜȣıĮȢ (lusas). Infinitive: ȜȣİȚȞ luein, ȜȣıĮȚ (lusai). 8! ! !"#$%&%&!'(!ʹ!')*+,-!#&.!/+&)+!%&!'&,%+&-!01++23!'41%)-!ʹ!56*+17+,-!.%)-%&,-%4&! Table 1.1: The aoristic±imperfective distinction for the verb ȜȣİȚȞ (luein) µWR ORRVHQ¶. Most grammars use the word tense for what should be called a tense-aspect pair, that is, a combination of tense, a member of the set ^past, present, future`, and aspect, a member of the set ^aorist, imperfect, perfect`. In Ancient Greek it is more evident than in modern European languages, because there are different morphemes for marking tense and aspect which can be seen throughout the verb paradigm. Table 1.2 demonstrates all Ancient Greek tense-aspect pairs which are discussed in this dissertation: Present Past IPSHUIHFWLYHµSUHVHQW¶µLPSHUIHFW¶ Aoristic - µDRULVW¶ So, the universal scheme of the sentence will be smth like that (of course tense and aspect operators must be formally interpretated, but we will talk about it later): TENSE (GRAM. ASPECT (predicate-argument structure)). The distinction between aoristic and imperfective aspect is a distinction in grammatical aspect. Thus, we will talk a little bit about the notion of aspect. The notion of aspect In this thesis Corien Bary uses the word aspect in a rather broad sense. It includes both grammatical aspect and aspectual classes or Aktionsart. Grammatical aspect FDQEHFDOOHG³LQWHUQDOWLPHRIWKHSUHGLFDWH´+RZHYHU the verb itself, without grammatical aspect, also has certain properties that are relevant aspectually. On the basis of these properties, verbs (predicate-argument structures, that is, the verb with its arguments) are divided in aspectual classes or Aktionsarten. Some predicates introduce inherent boundaries for eventualities, for example, John eat an apple and John run two miles. They belong to the class of bounded or telic predicates. Others do not introduce inherent boundaries, for example, John run and John be blond, and are called unbounded or atelic. 9! ! !"#$%&%&!'(!ʹ!')*+,-!#&.!/+&)+!%&!'&,%+&-!01++23!'41%)-!ʹ!56*+17+,-!.%)-%&,-%4&! Moreover, a subclass of the unbounded predicates is set apart as the stative predicates. Now, after being acquainted with the crucial for this work notion of aspect, we will pass on different interpretations of aorist and imperfect in Ancient Greek. Interpretations of aorist and imperfect in Ancient G reek Imperfective aspect, obviously, has a non-completed action interpretation (which seems to be restricted to atelic predicates class), but also has a habitual interpretation (which does not possess the stated restriction). Non-finished action: ȀȣȡȠȢįCİ ȠȣʌȦ µȘțİȞ ¶ĮȜȜ¶İIJȚ Kuros de RXSĀR KĀHNHQ DOO¶ eti Cyrus.nom prt not.yet be.present.pst.ipfv.3sg but still ʌȡȠıȘȜĮȣȞİ SURVĀHODXQH march.to.pst.IPFV.3sg ³&\UXVZDVQRW\HWSUHVHQWEXWKHZDVVWLOOPDUFKLQJRQ´ X. An. 1.5.12 Habitual interpretation: ǻȦȡĮ µȠȚ ĮȞĮ ʌĮȞ İIJȠȢİįȚįȠȣ dĀora hoi ana pan etos edidou, he.dat he.dat PREP every.acc year.acc give.pst.IPFV.3sg țĮȚ IJȘȞ ǺĮȕȣȜȦȞĮ ȠµȚ kai tĀen BabylĀona Hoi and the.acc Babylon.acc he.dat İįȦțİ HGĀRNH give.pst.AOR.3sg ³(YHU\\HDUKHJDYHKLPSUHVHQWVDQGKHJDYHKLP%DE\ORQ´ Hdt. 3.160.2 :! ! !"#$%&%&!'(!ʹ!')*+,-!#&.!/+&)+!%&!'&,%+&-!01++23!'41%)-!ʹ!56*+17+,-!.%)-%&,-%4&! Besides these interpretations there are conative and likelyhood interpretations (which is stongly related to the imperfective paradox): ǼʌİșȣȝȘıİ IJȘȢȤȜĮȞȚįȠȢțĮȚĮȣIJȘȞʌȡȠıİȜșȦȞ epethumĀese tĀes chlanidos kai autĀen proselthĀon long.for.pst.aor.3sg the.gen garment.gen and that.acc go.to.aor.ptcp.nom ȦȞİİIJȠµȠ įİȈȣȜȠıȦȞȜİȖİȚ Āoneeto. ho de 6XORVĀRQ . legei: buy.pst.IPFV.3sg the.nom prt Syloson.nom . say.prs.ipfv.3sg İȖȦ IJĮȣIJȘȞ ʌȦȜİȦ ȝİȞȠȣįİȞȠȢ ȤȡȘȝĮIJȠı HJĀR WDXWĀHQ SĀROHĀR men oudenos FKUĀHPDWRV I.nom that.acc sell.prs.ipfv.1sg prt no.gen money.gen įȚįȦȝȚ įİ ĮȜȜȦı GLGĀRPL de DOOĀRV give.prs.ipfv.1sg prt for.nothing ³+H set his heart upon the garment, came forward and wanted to buy LW%XW6\ORVRQVDLGµ,GRQ¶WVHOOWKDWRQHIRUDQ\PRQH\EXW,JLYH LWIRUIUHH¶´+GW-3 Aorist has complexive, ingressive, generic and tragic interpretations. Formal semantics approaches So now we are willing to know- KRZDOOWKHVH³DGGLWLRQDO´LQWHUSUHWDWLRQV come about? Here the formal semantics comes into play: the basis of the analysis in the present thesis is modified DRT (Discourse Representation Theory), typed- lambda theory originally developed by Kamp et al. In the Appendix you could find syntax, semantics and transformation rules of this semantics calculus. Discourse Representation Theory focuses on the interpretation of discourse rather than sentences in isolation. Its basic idea is that natural language utterances are interpreted in a continually evolving discourse. The logical forms of DRT are called Discourse Representation Structures (DRSs). They consist of a set of discourse markers and a set of conditions. ;! ! !"#$%&%&!'(!ʹ!')*+,-!#&.!/+&)+!%&!'&,%+&-!01++23!'41%)-!ʹ!56*+17+,-!.%)-%&,-%4&! Discourse markers represent objects that are introduced as the discourse proceeds. They function in a way similar to variables in predicate logic, and I will use these terms interchangeably. Conditions come in various kinds. They encode descriptive information that is assigned to discourse markers. Formally, a DRS K is an ordered pair U(K ),Con(K)!U(K), where U(K), the universe of K, is a set of discourse markers and Con(K) is a set of conditions. However, this analysis does not provide any solution to the aorist and imperfect interpretations. And De Swart approach seems to have solved the problem by introducing the notion of FRHUFLRQDQGVRFDOOHG³DVSHFWXDOO\VHQVLWLYHWHQVHRSHUDWRUV´ZKLFK serve to the operation of coercion (Coercion refers to the phenomenon that if there is a mismatch between the input requirements of an operator and the properties of its argument, the argument is reinterpreted in such a way that it satisfies the requirements). However, this theory is still not perfect: the main objection consists in the fact that Ancient Greek has a distinct morpheme for aspect forms a serious drawback for tKHFRHUFLRQDSSURDFKGLVFXVVHGRIGH6ZDUW¶VDQDO\VLVLW entails that aoristic and imperfective morphology are semantically vacuous. Postulating such a zero morpheme is not a very good decision. Thus, the author of the dissertation proposing new coercion operators: MAX (imality) and INGR (essive) and reformulating the tense operators. Thus, we can treat our Greek examples in a new way. De Swart¶V vs. Corien¶VWUHDWLQJRILPSHUIHFW-aorist distinction The basic hypothesis of these two approaches consists of following statements: x The main distinction between aoristic and imperfective aspects is aspectual classes dichotomy, that is, telic \ atelic predicates. <! ! !"#$%&%&!'(!ʹ!')*+,-!#&.!/+&)+!%&!'&,%+&-!01++23!'41%)-!ʹ!56*+17+,-!.%)-%&,-%4&! x All the additional interpretations of aorist and imperfect derives from the applying the coercion operation to the predicate-argument structure. In French, the imparfait and passHVLPSOHFDQEHanalyzed as past tense operators since they only occur in the past tense. So De Swart, working with the French data, naturally defines aorist and imperfect as aspect-sensitive tense operators. However, in Ancient Greek the aorist-imperfective distinction is not restricted to the past tense, so this presupposition will not work at all. This also OHDGVXVWRSUREOHPVZLWK'H6ZDUW¶VQRWLRQRIFRHUFion, since time cannot trigger coercion anymore. So the author has to redefine that notion in order not to get rid of it, since it is the main advantage introduced to the semantic analysis of aorist and imperfect by De Swart. To deal with the coercion better, Comrie introduces Egg¶s Duration Principle. His Duration Principle states that information on the duration of an eventuality that is introduced by various linguistic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Greek Verb Aspect
    Greek Verb Aspect Paul Bell & William S. Annis Scholiastae.org∗ February 21, 2012 The technical literature concerning aspect is vast and difficult. The goal of this tutorial is to present, as gently as possible, a few more or less commonly held opinions about aspect. Although these opinions may be championed by one academic quarter and denied by another, at the very least they should shed some light on an abstruse matter. Introduction The word “aspect” has its roots in the Latin verb specere meaning “to look at.” Aspect is concerned with how we view a particular situation. Hence aspect is subjective – different people will view the same situation differently; the same person can view a situation differently at different times. There is little doubt that how we see things depends on our psychological state at the mo- ment of seeing. The ‘choice’ to bring some parts of a situation into close, foreground relief while relegating others to an almost non-descript background happens unconsciously. But for one who must describe a situation to others, this choice may indeed operate consciously and deliberately. Hence aspect concerns not only how one views a situation, but how he chooses to relate, to re-present, a situation. A Definition of Aspect But we still haven’t really said what aspect is. So here’s a working definition – aspect is the dis- closure of a situation from the perspective of internal temporal structure. To put it another way, when an author makes an aspectual choice in relating a situation, he is choosing to reveal or conceal the situation’s internal temporal structure.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dialect of Elis and Its Position Within the Greek Dialectological System MA-Thesis for the Master Classics and Ancient Civilisations
    The dialect of Elis and its position within the Greek dialectological system MA-thesis for the Master Classics and Ancient Civilisations Le site antique d’Olympie, illustration taken from Minon 2007 : 559 by M.J. van der Velden BA supervisors: dr. L. van Beek dr. A. Rademaker 2015-17 Universiteit Leiden Table of contents i. Acknowledgements ii. List of abbreviations 0. Introduction 1. The dialect features of Elean 1.1 West Greek features 1.1.1 West Greek phonological features 1.1.2 West Greek morphological features 1.1.3 Conclusion 1.2 Northwest Greek features 1.2.1 Northwest Greek phonological features 1.2.2 Northwest Greek morphological features 1.2.3 Conclusion 1.3 Features in common with various other dialects 1.3.1 Phonological features in common with various other dialects 1.3.2 Morphological features in common with various other dialects 1.3.3 Conclusion 1.4 Specifically Elean features 1.4.1 Specifically Elean phonological features 1.4.2 Specifically Elean morphological features 1.4.3 Conclusion 1.5 General conclusion 2. Evaluation 2.1 The consonant stem accusative plural in -ες 2.2 The consonant stem dative plural endings -οις and -εσσι 2.3 The middle participle in /-ēmenos/ 2.4 The development *ē > ǟ 2.5 The development *ӗ > α 2.6 The development *i > ε 3. Conclusion 4. Bibliography 2 Acknowledgements First of all, I would like to express my deepest gratitude towards Lucien van Beek for supervising my work, without whose help, comments and – at times necessary – incitations this study would not have reached its current shape, as well as towards Adriaan Rademaker for carefully reading my work and sharing his remarks.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\#1 Work\Greek\Wwgreek\REVISED
    Review Book for Luschnig, An Introduction to Ancient Greek Part Two: Lessons VII- XIV Revised, August 2007 © C. A. E. Luschnig 2007 Permission is granted to print and copy for personal/classroom use Contents Lesson VII: Participles 1 Lesson VIII: Pronouns, Perfect Active 6 Review of Pronouns 8 Lesson IX: Pronouns 11 Perfect Middle-Passive 13 Lesson X: Comparison, Aorist Passive 16 Review of Tenses and Voices 19 Lesson XI: Contract Verbs 21 Lesson XII: -MI Verbs 24 Work sheet on -:4 verbs 26 Lesson XII: Subjunctive & Optative 28 Review of Conditions 31 Lesson XIV imperatives, etc. 34 Principal Parts 35 Review 41 Protagoras selections 43 Lesson VII Participles Present Active and Middle-Passive, Future and Aorist, Active and Middle A. Summary 1. Definition: A participle shares two parts of speech. It is a verbal adjective. As an adjective it has gender, number, and case. As a verb it has tense and voice, and may take an object (in whatever case the verb takes). 2. Uses: In general there are three uses: attributive, circumstantial, and supplementary. Attributive: with the article, the participle is used as a noun or adjective. Examples: @Ê §P@<JgH, J Ð<J", Ò :X88T< PD`<@H. Circumstantial: without the article, but in agreement with a noun or pronoun (expressed or implied), whether a subject or an object in the sentence. This is an adjectival use. The circumstantial participle expresses: TIME: (when, after, while) [:", "ÛJ\6", :gJ">b] CAUSE: (since) [Jg, ñH] MANNER: (in, by) CONDITION: (if) [if the condition is negative with :Z] CONCESSION: (although) [6"\, 6"\BgD] PURPOSE: (to, in order to) future participle [ñH] GENITIVE ABSOLUTE: a noun / pronoun + a participle in the genitive form a clause which gives the circumstances of the action in the main sentence.
    [Show full text]
  • Tense, Time, Aspect and the Ancient Greek Verb by Jerome Moran
    Tense, Time, Aspect and the Ancient Greek Verb by Jerome Moran early every – no, every – Greek The questions in the first sentence 3. In Greek the tense of a verb may Ngrammar and course book, even (‘deliberative’ questions, therefore in denote something different from or the most comprehensive (in English, the subjunctive) refer to present (or additional to the time at which the at any rate), gives a very skimpy, perhaps future) time. But one of act, event, occurrence, process, state perfunctory and unhelpful account — the verbs (εἴπωμεν) is in a past denoted by the verb is located. In insofar as it gives any account at all – of tense (aorist). The second sentence particular, it may denote something what ‘aspect’ is and how exactly it is refers to past time, but one of the called ‘aspect’. related to verb tense and time (which verbs (βούλοιτο) is in the present tend to be conflated). Most of the tense. 4. Whether the tense of a Greek verb books and articles on the subject of denotes time or/and aspect depends the aspect of the Greek verb are What is going on? The answer is in the first place on the mood of the accessible only to the professional something called ‘aspect’, and its verb (‘the form which a verb philologist, and can’t therefore be connection with tense and time. Just assumes in order to reflect the easily applied by non-specialists to the note for now a difference in the manner (modus) in which the speaker understanding of the actual usage of kind of things denoted by the verbs conceives the action’ (Woodcock)).
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson 58: Adverbial Clauses/The Circumstantial Participle A. Eight
    Lesson 58: Adverbial Clauses/The Circumstantial Participle A. Eight functions of the circumstantial participle are discussed in §§845-846: (1) time, (2) cause, (3) means, (4) manner, (5) purpose, (6) condition, (7) concession, and (8) attendant circumstance. Indicate in the blanks which of these eight functions are being served by the following circumstantial participles and translate (review the discussion of tense in §849) : ex.: time -Iowv o� �o�� 5XAOU� aVE�n EL� �b 5po� Mt 5:1 When he saw the orowds, he went up on the mountain. 1. Kat avoLEa� �b o�oHa au�ou EOLoaoKEv au�o�� Mt 5:2 Mk 1:20 Mk 1:21 4. Kat no8Lov �o�� o�axua� WWXOV�E� �aC� XEPOLV Lk 6:1 ALoaaKaAE • • • (cf. §848) Lk 20:21 245 246 6. xat &auuaoav�E� En� �fj anoxpCoE� au�oG EOCYnOav Lk 20:26 7. TaG�a �a pnua�a EAaAnOEv EV �� yako­ �uAaxl� o�oaoxwv EV �Q tEPQ In 8:20 Acts 10:27 B. As a modifier, a circumstantial participle agrees in gender, number and case with its antecedent (§8460) in the sentence unless it has its own subject in a genitive absolute con­ struction (§847). Underline the antecedents or subjects of the participles in the following sentences and translate (note §8470): 1. Ka�aBav�o� 08 au�ou an� �oG opou� nXOAou&noav au�� OXAO� nOAAol Mt 8:1 Mt 22:18 Mk 1:40 Mk 2:23 247 5. Kat AEYEL aULoL� tv tXElv� Lij nUEP� 6�Ca� YEVOUEVT)� Mk 4:3 5 c. Prepare Gal 1:11-24 (from selection #26) for class trans­ lation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aorist in Modern Armenian: Core Value and Contextual Meanings Anaid Donabedian-Demopoulos
    The aorist in Modern Armenian: core value and contextual meanings Anaid Donabedian-Demopoulos To cite this version: Anaid Donabedian-Demopoulos. The aorist in Modern Armenian: core value and contextual mean- ings. Zlatka Guentcheva. Aspectuality and Temporality. Descriptive and theoretical issues, John Benjamins, pp.375 - 412, 2016, 9789027267610. 10.1075/slcs.172.12don. halshs-01424956 HAL Id: halshs-01424956 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01424956 Submitted on 6 Jan 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. The Aorist in Modern Armenian: core value and contextual meanings, in Guentchéva, Zlatka (ed.), Aspectuality and Temporality. Descriptive and theoretical issues, John Benjamins, 2016, p. 375-411 (the published paper miss examples written in Armenian) The aorist in Modern Armenian: core values and contextual meanings Anaïd Donabédian (SeDyL, INALCO/USPC, CNRS UMR8202, IRD UMR135) Introduction Comparison between particular markers in different languages is always controversial, nevertheless linguists can identify in numerous languages a verb tense that can be described as aorist. Cross-linguistic differences exist, due to the diachrony of the markers in question and their position within the verbal system of a given language, but there are clearly a certain number of shared morphological, syntactic, semantic and/or pragmatic features.
    [Show full text]
  • 30. Tense Aspect Mood 615
    30. Tense Aspect Mood 615 Richards, Ivor Armstrong 1936 The Philosophy of Rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Rockwell, Patricia 2007 Vocal features of conversational sarcasm: A comparison of methods. Journal of Psycho- linguistic Research 36: 361−369. Rosenblum, Doron 5. March 2004 Smart he is not. http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/smart-he-is-not- 1.115908. Searle, John 1979 Expression and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Seddiq, Mirriam N. A. Why I don’t want to talk to you. http://notguiltynoway.com/2004/09/why-i-dont-want- to-talk-to-you.html. Singh, Onkar 17. December 2002 Parliament attack convicts fight in court. http://www.rediff.com/news/ 2002/dec/17parl2.htm [Accessed 24 July 2013]. Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson 1986/1995 Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell. Voegele, Jason N. A. http://www.jvoegele.com/literarysf/cyberpunk.html Voyer, Daniel and Cheryl Techentin 2010 Subjective acoustic features of sarcasm: Lower, slower, and more. Metaphor and Symbol 25: 1−16. Ward, Gregory 1983 A pragmatic analysis of epitomization. Papers in Linguistics 17: 145−161. Ward, Gregory and Betty J. Birner 2006 Information structure. In: B. Aarts and A. McMahon (eds.), Handbook of English Lin- guistics, 291−317. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Rachel Giora, Tel Aviv, (Israel) 30. Tense Aspect Mood 1. Introduction 2. Metaphor: EVENTS ARE (PHYSICAL) OBJECTS 3. Polysemy, construal, profiling, and coercion 4. Interactions of tense, aspect, and mood 5. Conclusion 6. References 1. Introduction In the framework of cognitive linguistics we approach the grammatical categories of tense, aspect, and mood from the perspective of general cognitive strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Indo-European K-Aorist
    Frederik Kortlandt, Leiden University, www.kortlandt.nl The Indo-European k-aorist Ten years ago I wrote (2007: 155f.): “It has been impossible to establish an original meaning for the alleged velar suffix in the root aorists fēcī and iēcī (cf. Untermann 1993). I therefore think that we have to look for a phonetic explanation. Since the -k- is limited to the singular in the Greek active aorist indicative, I am h inclined to regard fēc- as the phonetic reflex of monosyllabic *dhēk < *d eH1t, where *-k- may have been either an intrusive consonant after the laryngeal before the final *-t, like -p- in Latin emptus ‘bought’ or *-s- in Hittite ezta ‘he ate’ < *edto, or a remnant of the Indo-Uralic velar consonant from which the laryngeal developed, as in Finnish teke- ‘make’ (cf. Kortlandt 2002: 220). The present stems of faciō and iaciō support the former possibility. This would also account for Tocharian A tāk, B tāka ‘became’, h h which reflect *steH2t. In a similar vein I reconstruct *hēp < *g eH1b t and *sēp < *seH1pt for Oscan hipid, hipust ‘will hold’, sipus ‘knowing’. While Oscan hafiest ‘will hold’ is in accordance with the Latin, Celtic and Germanic evidence, Umbrian hab- suggests that h h h *g eH1b - yielded *g eb- with preglottalized *-b- at an early stage and that this root- final consonant was generalized in Italic. It appears that Latin capiō ‘take’ < *kH2p- adopted the -ē- of cēpī from its synonym apiō, ēpī, and that scabō, scābī ‘scratch’ reflects original *skebh- (cf. Schrijver 1991: 431).” As Untermann observes (1993: 463), the Latin stems fac- and iac- behave as roots of primary verbs, and the same holds for Sabellic and Venetic.
    [Show full text]
  • Tense and Aspect (Sentences)
    Tense and Aspect Tense or Aspect: A quick-reference table Form How it behaves Indicative Always by tense Infinitive Naturally by aspect (after e.g. βούλομαι) but In Indirect Statements/Commands, it behaves like what it replaces Optative Naturally by aspect (e.g. after ἵνα, in Indefinite Clauses/Conditions) but In Indirect Statements/Questions, it behaves like what it replaces Subjunctive Always by aspect Imperative Always by aspect It is clear from the above table that most verb forms in Greek, including nearly everything that you find in subordinate clauses, is more likely to behave by aspect than by tense. NB The Imperfect and Future (where these exist) always operate by tense. Practice Sentences 1. οἱ δ᾽ Ἀθηναῖοι, ἵνα μὴ διασπασθείησαν, ἐπηκολούθουν. ..................................................................................................................................... 2. οὕτω δ᾽ ἐτάχθησαν, ἵνα μὴ διέκπλουν διδοῖεν. ..................................................................................................................................... 3. ὑπονοῶν ὅτι ἀποπορεύσοιτο καὶ ἀπάξοι τὸν στρατὸν οἴκαδε, διέβη τῆς νυκτὸς. ..................................................................................................................................... 4. οἴμοι, τί δράσω; τίς σε βαστάσει φίλων; ..................................................................................................................................... 5. ἐπεὶ δὲ οἱ πολέμιοι κατεῖχον, οὐδὲν ἔχοντες ὅ τι ποιήσαιεν, παρέδοσαν σφᾶς αὐτούς. ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Greek Tenses in John's Apocalypse
    CHAPTER 13 Greek Tenses in John’s Apocalypse: Issues in Verbal Aspect, Discourse Analysis, and Diachronic Change Buist M. Fanning This essay will concentrate on discourse functions for the Greek tenses in the Apocalypse of John. I will pursue this through a dialogue with and critique of David Mathewson’s views as presented in his 2010 monograph published by Brill and an earlier article in Novum Testamentum (2008) on this topic.1 Mathewson’s work is a reflection of a larger school of thought on nt Greek ver- bal usage that has been influenced greatly by Stanley Porter, and so this gives me an opportunity to interact with the views of a larger group of recent writers based on work that I have done on verbal aspect in nt Greek.2 The issue that triggers this discussion is what some have called the confu- sion of tenses or erratic shifting of tenses in John’s Apocalypse, just one area of the larger topic of John’s solecisms or unusual Greek grammatical expressions.3 What Mathewson argues for (following Porter) and what I will dispute in this paper is twofold: (1) that aspect alone is the focus of the ancient Greek tense forms; they do not in themselves express any temporal meaning; in regard to the Apocalypse if we take time out of the equation, we eliminate all of the supposed problems with shifting tense forms; (2) the main secondary effect of aspect is a certain function to reflect discourse prominence, that is, back- ground, foreground, and frontground events or features in a text.
    [Show full text]
  • HANSEN & QUINN: Review Sheet #7 (For Units 11-20)
    HANSEN & QUINN: Review Sheet #7 (for Units 11-20) - Clauses (KEY) 1). How does one generally issue a command in Greek? The imperative mood, of course. Alternatives include the hortatory subjunctive and independent object clauses of effort. 2). What are the two basic ways to make a prohibition in Greek? Be specific about the circumstances in which each is employed. Prohibitions (introduced by ) employ either the imperative or a subjunctive. For a prohibition with simple aspect, employ the aorist subjunctive (hortatory in the first person plural, prohibitive in the second and third persons). For progressive/repeated aspect, employ the present imperative in the second and third persons, the present (hortatory) subjunctive in the first (plural). 3). Describe the four types of temporal clause with which you are familiar: moods of verbs in main and temporal clause, temporal conjunctionsmÆ employed and what sort of relative time each conjunction indicates. Past definite temporal clauses are introduced by a past tense of the indicative (negative ) and ί or ("after, when") + a past (usually aorist) indicative (negative ) to indicate prior action, ("when") + an aorist or imperfect indicative (negative ) to indicate simultaneous action. Present general temporal clauses are introduced by a present indicative (negative ) and ("after, when, whenever") + an aorist subjunctive (negative ) to indicate prior action, ("when, whenever") + a present or aorist subjunctive (negative ) to indicate simultaneous action. Past general temporal clauses are introduced by an imperfect indicative (negative ) and ί or ("after, when, whenever") + an aorist optative (negative ) to indicate prior action, ("whenever") + a present or aorist optativeoÈ (negative§pe §peidÆ ) to indicate simultaneous action.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMENTARY 1.1. Ως Ε Πολ Εµησαν. Instead of Using the Accusative
    COMMENTARY 1.1. ως επλεµησαν . Instead of using the accusative relative pronoun ν& referring to τν πλεµν , Thucydides uses an indirect question with a displaced object, literally, “He wrote the war, how they fought.” This figure is called prolepsis (literally, “anticipation”) or the “lilies-of-the-field construction” (from the biblical verse Matt. 6:28, “Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow” [καταµα θετε τακρ ινα τυ αγρυ πωςαυα ν- υσιν]). “The subject of the dependent clause is often anticipated and made the object of the verb of the principal clause” (Sm. §2182). ευθ υς καθισταµενυ . Genitive absolute expressing time. Notice that in Greek, unlike the Latin ablative absolute, a participle may stand alone without a noun in the genitive when it is obvious what such a noun would be. Sm. §2072. The full expression would be ευθ υς καθισταµενυ τυ πλεµυ , “the moment the war broke out.” ελπισας . “expecting.” Verbs meaning hope, expect, promise, threaten, swear, etc. take the future infinitive in indirect discourse. Sm. §1868. τεκµαιρµαι . After Homer—i.e., in classical Greek—this verb means “judge from signs or tokens.” But here, Thucydides has used it in a special sense, “taking as evidence for this judgment [that it was going to be the greatest war ever] the fact that . .” 18 Commentary 19 υνιστα µενν . Indirect discourse with accusative plus participle after a verb of perception (ρων). Sm. §2110–12. τµ εν ...τδ ε . When used with µεν and δε without a following noun, the article behaves like a demonstrative. Sm. §1106–7. The combination µεν ..
    [Show full text]