Considering a Competitive University Aims and Objectives

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Considering a competitive university Aims and objectives • To understand what a competitive university is • Develop an understanding of what the benefits of attending a competitive university are Making your choice • There are over 300 Higher Education providers • You need to narrow down your choice to 5 or less Competitive Universities • Research intensive • Excellent learning experience • World class research • Reputation Activity Benefits Ranking University 1 Oxford 11 Surrey 2 Cambridge 12 Lancaster 3 St Andrews 13 Loughborough 4 Imperial College 14 East Anglia 5 London School of Economics 15 Birmingham 6 Durham 16 York 7 Exeter 17 Leeds 8 Warwick 18 Southampton 9 University College London 19 Bristol 10 Bath 20 Leicester (The Times and Sunday Times Good University Guide league table 2015) The Russell Group The Russell Group… • Is a group of 24 Universities • Share common goals: - Outstanding teaching - World class research - Excellent learning experience Russell Group bingo The Russell Group University of Birmingham University of Manchester University of Bristol Newcastle University University of Cambridge University of Nottingham Cardiff University University of Oxford Durham University Queen Mary University of Edinburgh Queen’s University Belfast University of Exeter University of Sheffield University of Glasgow University of Southampton Imperial College London University College London King’s College London University of Warwick University of Leeds University of York University of Liverpool LSE What does this mean for me? • Highest number of students achieving top grades on graduation • High levels of student satisfaction • Taught by academics delivering world class research • Better employability and salary What are universities looking for? • Academic ability • Interest in your chosen subject • Transferable skills • Understanding of what the degree programme involves Application process • Achieved and predicted grades • Personal statement • Reference • Interviews • Admissions tests To conclude You should now… • Know what a competitive university is • Have gained an understanding of what the benefits of applying to a competitive university are. • Know a little about the Russell Group JoinAny the question?Conversation! Contact:#ExeterOpen Tel: 01392 xxxxxx @uniofexeter Xxxxxx @exeter.ac.uk facebook.com/exeteruni www.exeter.ac.uk.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Download This PDF File
Leah Tether and Laura Chuhan Campbell Early Book Collections and Modern Audiences: Harnessing the Identity/ies of Book Collections as Collective Resources This article summarizes and contextualizes the discussions of a workshop held at Durham University in November 2018. In this workshop, participants (includ- ing academics, students, independent scholars, special and rare books librarians, and archivists) discussed the notion of the collection (that is, the identity of collection as a whole, rather than just its constituent parts), and its potential to serve as a means of engaging both scholarly and public audiences with early book cultures. This study sets out a series of considerations and questions that might be used when tackling such special collections engagement projects, including ones involving more modern collections than the case studies examined here. In November 2018, the Institute for Medieval and Early Modern Studies at Durham University kindly funded a workshop to investigate the ways in which contemporary audiences have been, are being, and can become engaged with medieval and early- modern book culture through the provision and distribution of key resources. These resources range from published books to digital artefacts and editions; from replica teaching kits—such as scriptorium suitcases—to physical archives and repositories.1 The aim of the workshop, which was led by one of this article’s two authors (Leah Tether), was to build a picture of best practice to inform the teaching and commu- 1. The authors are grateful to Durham’s Institute for Medieval and Early Modern Studies for fund- ing the workshop, and to the administrators of the Residential Research Library Fellowships (jointly organized by Ushaw College and Durham University) that enabled Leah Tether to spend time in Durham in November 2018.
[Show full text]
The Counselling Service Annual Report
The Counselling Service Annual Report 2017/18 1 Contents Contents ........................................................................................................................... 2 Counselling Service Team .................................................................................................. 3 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 4 About the service .............................................................................................................. 4 Service Use ........................................................................................................................ 5 What we have done ........................................................................................................... 9 Bradford College…………………………………………………………………………………………..10 Equality monitoring ......................................................................................................... 11 Evaluation ....................................................................................................................... 12 2 Counselling Service Team Head of Service Penelope Aspinall Permanent staff (core team) Yvonne Messenger, senior counsellor (0.6 fte) Peter Wakefield, senior counsellor (0.5 fte) Gill Barlow, counsellor (1.0 fte) Sarah Farnell, counsellor (0.6 fte) Stuart Yates, counsellor (0.5 fte) Administrative Staff Gilly Butcher, administrator, (0.55 fte) Helen Trevisani, administrator (0.6 fte) Sessional
[Show full text]
University of Exeter Ib Requirements
University Of Exeter Ib Requirements Is Gerard socialistic when Wes fixating nationally? Virgilio is antimicrobial: she beautifies contemptuously and befogging her Baalism. If out-of-place or subjunctive Hamid usually enchants his lockers tricing amusingly or taper censurably and injunctively, how treen is Phillipe? Epq is assessed at least two institutions very high density of friends to harvard school requirements exeter is available, you the welsh baccalaureate Is Exeter University posh? Exeter Free 200 IBConsultingGeneral Interview Questions from JP Morgan. Here is inside list of universities who attain not rely heavily on the ukcat score University of. In both exeter college you in comparison for membership with the medicine at grade c is a good your qualification equivalencies we do pets make you discuss our requirements of university exeter! A quality-assured university programme validated by the University of Exeter. A matrix which details the IB entry requirements to pay top 50 UK universities. What niche the largest town in Devon? University acceptance IB Maths Resources from British. Advice on entry requirements application progress and pre-application. Undergraduate Law Degree Entry Requirements ULaw. Your IA maths exploration this linked site gives the full kitchen of assessment criteria you will. In addition follow these materials we how an interview. Activities between the University of British Columbia and Exeter include the joint. University of canterbury mba mpcursosonline. Entry Requirements For the pre-Masters courses typical entry requirements. Cambridge architecture interview questions ubiRecruit. Cranking the old plymouth France & Irel At Plymouth. 2 Phillips Andover Academy 2 Pitzer College 2 Purdue University Dec 12 2016.
[Show full text]
University of Warwick Institutional Repository
University of Warwick institutional repository: http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap/73122 This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page. Investigating critical sense in the interpretation of media graphs by Carlos Eduardo Ferreira Monteiro A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Mathematics Education University of Warwick, Institute of Education April 2005 INDEX Contents ......................................................................................... List of Figures...... .. .... ... ... ......... ... ..... .......... ..... .......... ...... ... ..... ..... ..... v List of Tables............................ ........ ...... ............ ...... ............... ... ...... VI Acknowledgments .............................................................................. viii Declaration ....................................... " . .. .. .. .. ix Abstract........................................................................................... x Contents CHAPTER 1 - Introduction...... ....... ........... ............... ... ..... .... .......... ... 1 1.1 Setting the scene .............. ,.. ........ ......... ......... ....... ...... ...... .......
[Show full text]
Draft ‐ Draft‐ Draft‐ Draft ‐ Draft ‐ Draft !
!DRAFT ‐ DRAFT‐ DRAFT‐ DRAFT ‐ DRAFT ‐ DRAFT ! RVR1 – Devon and Cornwall, 31 January – 3 February 2010 CDG – Mike Osborne, Jean‐Marie Filloque, Chris Shepherd, Angelica Kaus LP – Caroline Chipperfield with Rebekah Southern Individuals Consulted: see appendix 1 Programme of meetings: see appendix 2 Executive Summary Regional Characteristics The characteristics of the region for the purposes of the PURE project have been highlighted in the regions RP. The project area is the Peninsula of Devon and Cornwall, two neighbouring counties in the South West of England with a combined population of 1,664,500, 1,135,000 in Devon and 529,500 in Cornwall. Both counties have a rural element, a strong maritime heritage, are tourist regions and important retirement locations. The Peninsula area embraces numerous heritage sites, national parks and some of the nation’s finest tourist sites, notably the internationally renowned Eden Project. Devon and Cornwall share significant common features and have similar challenges and ambitions. In terms of administration, Cornwall has a single unitary authority whilst Devon consists of a County Council with 8 local government districts and 2 separately administered Unitary Authorities. Both Devon and Cornwall are actively engaged with the South West Regional Development Authority (SWRDA) and the Government Office of the South West (GOSW). Whilst the area’s attractiveness as a rural location is a positive feature, its distance and remoteness from the rest of England creates logistical problems for businesses wishing
[Show full text]
The Conference Programme
1 Contents Letter from Organisers and Acknowledgements ................................................................................... 3 Welcome Message for the Inaugural University of Bristol School of Education Online Doctoral Conference ............................................................................................................................................. 4 Keynote Speakers ................................................................................................................................... 5 Professor Robin Shields ...................................................................................................................... 5 Dr Liz Jackson ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Workshop series ‘Making and Mapping with Mr Benn’ ........................................................................ 7 The Conference Programme ................................................................................................................ 10 Day 1 Schedule: Friday, 5th June ....................................................................................................... 10 Day 2 Schedule: Saturday, 6th June .................................................................................................. 13 Friday Abstracts ................................................................................................................................... 16 Morning sessions .............................................................................................................................
[Show full text]
Stacking Chairs: Local Sense and Global Nonsense
Short and Sweet i-Perception Stacking Chairs: Local Sense January-February 2018, 1–5 ! The Author(s) 2018 DOI: 10.1177/2041669517752372 and Global Nonsense journals.sagepub.com/home/ipe Nicholas E. Scott-Samuel University of Bristol, UK Hiroshi Ashida Kyoto University, Japan P. George Lovell University of Abertay Dundee, School of Social and Health Sciences, UK Tim S. Meese Aston University, School of Life and Health Sciences, Birmingham, UK D. Samuel Schwarzkopf University College London, UK Abstract We report a confusing stimulus which demonstrates the power of local interpretation of three- dimensional structure to disrupt a coherent global perception. Keywords 3D perception, depth, perception, illusion Figure 1 shows a photograph of nine stackable chairs, leaning back at an angle against a wall. For all observers (n ¼ 40þ, recruited ad hoc via Facebook, where the stimulus was displayed), this image elicits confusion. If the number of chairs is reduced below four, the eﬀect disappears. Figure 2(a) is an annotated version of Figure 1. The local interpretation of three-dimensional structure – at each ‘corner’, i.e. AD, BC and EF – is generally unambiguous (apart from AD, which ﬂips in depth in a Necker-cube-like manner for some observers). But the repetition of the stacked elements along the virtual contours AD, BC and, to a lesser extent, EF suggests a change in depth along those lines which does not actually exist. Figure 2(b) makes this explicit: an abstracted version of the image reveals an alternative interpretation, which fails to correspond to reality – the repetitive structure now looks more like a stack of quadrilaterals rising from the ground plane.
[Show full text]
Overseas Resits: a Comparison of Russell Group Universities' Policies
Overseas Resits: A Comparison of Russell Group Universities’ Policies The University of Manchester does not currently allow resit examinations to be held away from the University. This policy contrasts with those of many other Russell Group universities, which allow students whose permanent residence is overseas to take resit exams in their home country, either as a matter of course, or in exceptional circumstances. The table below sets out each Universities’ position on this, with information taken from their websites. Information from some Russell Group Universities (Cambridge, Oxford, Queen Mary, Queens Belfast, UCL) could not be found on their websites, which may indicate that they do not allow the practice of overseas resits. University Overseas Resits Venues Used Procedure Policy on Time University Fee More Info Allowed? Difference (additional fees may be charged by venues) Birmingham Yes, with British Embassy, Student contacts venue to Not stated explicitly, but £100 per exam https://intranet.bir permission of British Council check availability and obtain the request form advises period mingham.ac.uk/as/l students school Office or contact details, then completes ‘the actual (local) time earning- / department (exceptionally) request form (countersigned you will be required to spaces/exams/over Overseas by school / dept examinations attend for your seas.aspx University officer). Thereafter, examinations is likely to Examinations Office liaise with be different from venue and send student the UK times to account confirmation of acceptance or for any time difference’ otherwise. Bristol Yes, but in British Council Student completes request There must be some £50 per exam http://www.bristol. exceptional Office or form and returns it to home overlap between exam ac.uk/exams/exams cases only (and (exceptionally) school for signature by Head of times in the UK and -outside-uk.html/ not allowed at Overseas School or nominee.
[Show full text]
INTO Takes You Higher Success at a World-Class University Starts Here
INTO takes you higher Success at a world-class university starts here www.intohigher.com 2 INTO Life changing INTO specialises in deeply embedded, long-term partnerships that transform the capacity, reach and competitive positioning of universities. Major private investment supports innovation targeted to deliver a distinctive, first-class student experience within a university-led partnership enhancing brand quality and academic reputation. INTO 3 90% student progression to a university of their choice in the UK and US INTO brings ambitious students and leading universities together. We provide 87% student satisfaction an exceptional education experience to across all our study centres help you succeed in a fast-moving, 1:9 teacher to student ratio and small globally competitive world. classes deliver a first-class study experience www.intohigher.com Study in the UK page 18 Study in the USA page 40 Study in China page 48 4 INTO Your choice of leading universities INTO 5 Over 80 UK universities accepted our Every ambitious student wants to INTO STUDent PROGRESSION students onto their degree programmes in live and study at a leading university. Destination UNIVERSITY RANKING* 2009/2010 At INTO we turn that ambition into Aston University 29 reality with 90% of our students Cardiff University 34 Progression officers providing academic progressing to a university of Durham University 6 and social opportunities to engage in King's College London 16 university life their choice. Lancaster University 10 Loughborough University 16 Choosing to study overseas will give you an Placement services to support your Newcastle University 25 university application advantage at every stage of your life.
[Show full text]
Main Panel C
MAIN PANEL C Sub-panel 13: Architecture, Built Environment and Planning Sub-panel 14: Geography and Environmental Studies Sub-panel 15: Archaeology Sub-panel 16: Economics and Econometrics Sub-panel 17: Business and Management Studies Sub-panel 18: Law Sub-panel 19: Politics and International Studies Sub-panel 20: Social Work and Social Policy Sub-panel 21: Sociology Sub-panel 22: Anthropology and Development Studies Sub-panel 23: Education Sub-panel 24: Sport and Exercise Sciences, Leisure and Tourism Where required, specialist advisers have been appointed to the REF sub-panels to provide advice to the REF sub-panels on outputs in languages other than English, and / or English-language outputs in specialist areas, that the panel is otherwise unable to assess. This may include outputs containing a substantial amount of code, notation or technical terminology analogous to another language In addition to these appointments, specialist advisers will be appointed for the assessment of classified case studies and are not included in the list of appointments. Main Panel C Main Panel C Chair Professor Jane Millar University of Bath Deputy Chair Professor Graeme Barker* University of Cambridge Members Professor Robert Blackburn University of Liverpool Mr Stephen Blakeley 3B Impact From Mar 2021 Professor Felicity Callard* University of Glasgow Professor Joanne Conaghan University of Bristol Professor Nick Ellison University of York Professor Robert Hassink Kiel University Professor Kimberly Hutchings Queen Mary University of London From Jan 2021
[Show full text]
Access Agreement 2018-19
FALMOUTH UNIVERSITY ACCESS AGREEMENT 2018-19 ACCESS AGREEMENT SUBMITTED TO THE OFFICE FOR FAIR ACCESS Submitted 25 April 2017; revised 22 June 2017 FALMOUTH UNIVERSITY ACCESS AGREEMENT 2018-19 Contents: 1. Introduction and OFFA priorities for 2018-19 page 3 2. Fees, student numbers and fee income page 5 3. Access, student success and progression measures page 7 4. Financial support page 15 5. Targets and milestones page 16 6. Monitoring and evaluation agreements page 16 7. Equality and Diversity page 16 8. Provision of information to prospective students page 17 9. Consulting with students page 17 Annex: Access Agreement Resource Plan, 2018-19 Page 2 of 18 1a. Introduction This Access Agreement sets out Falmouth University’s plans and targets to support access, student success and progression for the year 2018-19. This Agreement has been developed in the context of the University’s Strategic Plan for the period 2015 to 2020. The Strategic Plan’s key objectives reflect the University’s commitment to fair access across the student lifecycle. Our first objective is ‘to produce satisfied graduates who get great jobs’, which includes ambitious targets for student retention, student satisfaction and graduate employment. Our second objective is ‘to help grow Cornwall’, which includes a commitment to double the number of students recruited from the county from 2013-14 levels by 2020. This objective will be achieved through a sharpened focus on recruiting students from disadvantaged backgrounds. The Strategic Plan states: ‘We will work with other agencies in the region to build support systems to retain more of our creative talent for the benefit of Cornwall.
[Show full text]
Annual Report 2016
University Library Annual Report 2016 www.lboro.ac.uk/library Library values • A library environment that is safe, welcoming, and offers a variety of comfortable spaces that will inspire learning, research and creativity • Staff that are approachable, helpful, knowledgeable, courteous and take pride in working for the University Library • Information sources that are easily accessible, relevant, reliable and of high quality 1 Contents Library values 1 1. Introduction 3 2. Building Excellence – the University Library’s Response 4 Investing in our staff 4 Educating for success 6 Growing capacity and influence 10 Raising standards and aspirations 14 3. Summary 18 4. Appendices Appendix 1 Statistical Summary 19 Appendix 2 Expenditure Summary 20 Appendix 3 Staff publications and presentations 21 2 1. Introduction Welcome to the University Library Annual Report 2015/16 The Library continues its drive towards excellence in all areas of service and in 2015/16 this was reflected in the scores we achieved in a range of surveys and league tables as well as the positive feedback we have received from our users. In June the University Library was reviewed as part of the Quadrennial Review process and we found it a very positive experience. This review has given us some areas to reflect upon, investigate, develop and implement during the coming year and beyond. In addition the library provision at our London campus has also undergone some significant changes offering an opportunity to provide a more developed service to users in London. None of the achievements outlined would have been possible without the hard work and commitment of Library staff and others outside of the Library.
[Show full text]