DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Listing Advice and Conservation Advice for the Illawarra and South Coast Lowland Grassy Woodland Ecological Community

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Listing Advice and Conservation Advice for the Illawarra and South Coast Lowland Grassy Woodland Ecological Community Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) (s266B) Draft listing advice and conservation advice for the Illawarra and south coast lowland grassy woodland ecological community 1. The Threatened Species Scientific Committee (the Committee) was established under the EPBC Act and has obligations to present advice to the Minister for the Environment (the Minister) in relation to the listing and conservation of threatened ecological communities, including under sections 189, 194N and 266B of the EPBC Act. 2. The Committee will provide its advice on the Illawarra and south coast lowland grassy woodland ecological community to the Minister as a draft conservation advice by 31 July 2016. 3. The Minister will decide whether to amend the list of threatened ecological communities under Section 184 of the EPBC Act to include the Illawarra and south coast lowland grassy woodland ecological community. It is noted that a portion of the ecological community is listed under the New South Wales Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995. 4. This draft conservation advice for the Illawarra and south coast lowland grassy woodland ecological community will be made available for expert and public comment for a minimum of 30 business days. The Committee and Minister will have regard to all public and expert comment relevant to the consideration of the ecological community. 5. This draft conservation advice has been developed based on the best available information at this time. ILLAWARRA AND SOUTH COAST LOWLAND GRASSY WOODLAND ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY DRAFT LISTING ADVICE AND CONSERVATION ADVICE MARCH 2016 Contents 1 Description of the ecological community ............................................................. 4 1.1 Name of the ecological community ........................................................................................ 4 1.2 Location and physical environment ........................................................................................ 4 1.3 Vegetative components of the ecological community ............................................................ 5 1.3.1 Canopy ............................................................................................................................. 6 1.3.2 Understorey ...................................................................................................................... 6 1.4 Faunal components of the ecological community ................................................................... 7 1.5 Key diagnostic characteristics and condition thresholds......................................................... 8 1.5.1 Key diagnostic characteristics.......................................................................................... 9 1.5.2 Other diagnostic considerations ....................................................................................... 9 1.5.3 Condition thresholds for EPBC Act protection ............................................................. 10 1.6 Further information to assist in determining the presence of the ecological community and significant impacts on the ecological community ............................................................................ 11 1.6.1 Defining a patch ............................................................................................................. 12 1.6.2 Buffer Zone .................................................................................................................... 12 1.6.3 Revegetated areas and areas of regrowth ....................................................................... 12 1.6.4 Sampling protocol .......................................................................................................... 12 1.6.5 Surrounding environment, landscape context and other significant considerations ...... 13 1.6.6 Area critical to the survival of the ecological community ............................................. 14 1.6.7 Geographic extent and patch size distribution ............................................................... 14 1.7 Relationship to other vegetation classification systems ........................................................ 17 1.8 Other existing protection ....................................................................................................... 17 1.8.1 Relationship with other threatened ecological communities ......................................... 17 1.8.2 Listed threatened flora and fauna species ...................................................................... 19 2 SUMMARY OF THREATS ................................................................................ 21 2.1 Key Threatening Processes ................................................................................................... 23 More information on threats to the ecological community is provided in ............ 23 3 SUMMARY OF ELIGIBILITY FOR LISTING AGAINST EPBC ACT CRITERIA ................................................................................................................... 24 4 Priority Research and Conservation Actions .................................................... 26 2 4.1 Conservation Objective ......................................................................................................... 26 4.2 Priority protection and restoration actions ............................................................................ 26 4.3 Research and monitoring priorities ....................................................................................... 32 4.5 Offsets ................................................................................................................................... 33 4.6 Existing plans/management prescriptions ............................................................................. 34 4.7 Recovery Plan Recommendation .......................................................................................... 35 Appendices ................................................................................................................... 36 Appendix A-Draft map of likely occurrence of the ecological community ........... 36 Appendix B – Species lists .......................................................................................... 37 Appendix C- Land use history; Indigenous cultural values and knowledge of the ecological community .................................................................................................. 47 Appendix D- Additional information on landscape, ecology and biology ............. 49 Appendix E – Description of threats ......................................................................... 55 Appendix F – Eligibility for listing against EPBC Act criteria .............................. 62 BIBLIOGRAPHY ....................................................................................................... 69 List of tables Table 1 Mean annual rainfall for sites near where the ecological community occurs ........................... 5 Table 2 Condition thresholds for patches of Illawarra and south coast lowland grassy woodland ..... 11 Table 3 Spatial extent of the ecological community ............................................................................ 15 Table 4 Remnant patch sizes................................................................................................................ 16 Table 5 Threatened flora and fauna that may occur in the ecological community .............................. 19 Table 6 Potentially relevant key threatening processes identified in the Threatened Species and Communities Act (NSW) and the EPBC Act. ..................................................................................... 23 Table 7 Fauna that may be present in the ecological community ........................................................ 37 Table 8 Plants that may occur in the ecological community ............................................................... 39 Table 9 D'harawal seasonal calendar extract ....................................................................................... 48 Table 10 Declared weeds in Local Control Authority areas for Illawarra District Weeds Authority and Eurobodalla Local Government Area ........................................................................................... 57 Table 11 Estimated original and current extent of the ecological community .................................... 62 Table 12 Area of the ecological community by patch size .................................................................. 64 List of Figures Figure 1 Map of patches of Illawarra and south coast lowland grassy woodland ecological community patches and all native woody vegetation in the Illawarra subregion. ............................... 54 Figure 2 Patch size in the ecological community ................................................................................ 64 3 1 DESCRIPTION OF THE ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY 1.1 Name of the ecological community The name of the ecological community is the Illawarra and south coast lowland grassy woodland. The ecological community was placed on the 2014 Finalised Priority Assessment List as the ‘Illawarra Lowlands Grassy Woodland’ (hereafter referred to as ‘Illawarra and south coast lowland grassy woodland’, or ‘the ecological community’). It comprises eucalypt woodlands; typically with a shrub layer and/or a grassy ground layer. The distribution is patchy, with the main remaining occurrences mostly on lowland sandy loam soils around Wollongong,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sydney Harbour a Systematic Review of the Science 2014
    Sydney Harbour A systematic review of the science 2014 Sydney Institute of Marine Science Technical Report The Sydney Harbour Research Program © Sydney Institute of Marine Science, 2014 This publication is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material provided that the wording is reproduced exactly, the source is acknowledged, and the copyright, update address and disclaimer notice are retained. Disclaimer The authors of this report are members of the Sydney Harbour Research Program at the Sydney Institute of Marine Science and represent various universities, research institutions and government agencies. The views presented in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of The Sydney Institute of Marine Science or the authors other affiliated institutions listed below. This report is a review of other literature written by third parties. Neither the Sydney Institute of Marine Science or the affiliated institutions take responsibility for the accuracy, currency, reliability, and correctness of any information included in this report provided in third party sources. Recommended Citation Hedge L.H., Johnston E.L., Ayoung S.T., Birch G.F., Booth D.J., Creese R.G., Doblin M.A., Figueira W.F., Gribben P.E., Hutchings P.A., Mayer Pinto M, Marzinelli E.M., Pritchard T.R., Roughan M., Steinberg P.D., 2013, Sydney Harbour: A systematic review of the science, Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Sydney, Australia. National Library of Australia Cataloging-in-Publication entry ISBN: 978-0-646-91493-0 Publisher: The Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Available on the internet from www.sims.org.au For further information please contact: SIMS, Building 19, Chowder Bay Road, Mosman NSW 2088 Australia T: +61 2 9435 4600 F: +61 2 9969 8664 www.sims.org.au ABN 84117222063 Cover Photo | Mike Banert North Head The light was changing every minute.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Plan for Pimelea Spicata Pimelea Spicata Recovery Plan
    © Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW), 2005 This work is copyright, however material presented in this plan may be copied for personal use or published for educational purposes, providing that any extracts are fully acknowledged. Apart from this and any other use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced without prior written permission from the Department of Environment and Conservation. The NPWS is part of the Department of Environment and Conservation Department of Environment and Conservation 43 Bridge Street (PO Box 1967) Hurstville NSW 2220 www.nationalparks.nsw.gov.au Requests for information or comments regarding the recovery program for Pimelea spicata should be directed to: The Director General, Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW) C/- Coordinator Pimelea spicata recovery program Biodiversity Conservation Section, Metropolitan Branch Environment Protection and Regulation Division Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW) PO Box 1967 Hurstville NSW 2220 Ph: (02) 9585 6678 Fax: (02) 9585 6442 Cover photograph: Pimelea spicata in flower growing amongst grasses at Mt Warrigal in the Illawarra Photographer: Martin Bremner This Plan should be cited as following: Department of Environment and Conservation (2005) Pimelea spicata R. Br. Recovery Plan. Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW), Hurstville NSW. ISBN: 1 74137 333 6 DEC 2006/181 Approved Recovery Plan for Pimelea spicata Pimelea spicata Recovery Plan Executive summary This document constitutes the formal Commonwealth and New South Wales State Recovery Plan for the small shrub Pimelea spicata (Thymelaeaceae), and as such considers the conservation requirements of the species across its known range. It identifies the future actions to be taken to ensure the long-term viability of P.
    [Show full text]
  • 17 December 2019
    MINUTES OF THE ORDINARY MEETING OF COUNCIL commencing at 5.02pm on TUESDAY 17 DECEMBER 2019 Council Chambers 11 Manning Street, KIAMA NSW 2533 MINUTES OF THE ORDINARY MEETING 17 DECEMBER 2019 Contents MINUTES OF THE ORDINARY MEETING OF THE COUNCIL OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF KIAMA HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, KIAMA ON TUESDAY 17 DECEMBER 2019 AT 5.02PM PRESENT: Mayor – Councillor M Honey, Deputy Mayor – Councillor A Sloan, Councillors M Brown, N Reilly, K Rice, W Steel, D Watson, M Way and M Westhoff IN ATTENDANCE: General Manager, Acting Director Environmental Services, Acting Director Corporate and Commercial Services, Acting Director Engineering and Works and Director Blue Haven 1 Apologies 1 APOLOGIES Nil. 2 Acknowledg ement of Traditional owners 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF TRADITIONAL OWNERS The Mayor declared the meeting open and acknowledged the traditional owners: “I would like to acknowledge the traditional owners of the Land on which we meet, the Wadi Wadi people of the Dharawal nation, and pay my respect to Elders past and present.” 3.1 Or dinar y C ouncil on 19 N ovember 2019 3 Confirmati on of Minutes of Pr evious M eeting 3.1 ORD INAR Y C OUNCIL ON 19 N OVEM BER 2019 3 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING 3.1 Ordinary Council on 19 November 2019 19/464OC Resolved that the Minutes of the Ordinary Council Meeting held on 19 November 2019 be received and accepted. (Councillors Way and Steel) For: Councillors Brown, Honey, Reilly, Rice, Sloan, Steel, Watson, Way and Westhoff Against: Nil Kiama Municipal Council Page 2 MINUTES OF
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Sydney Coastal Dry Sclerophyll Forest Litter on Fuels and Fire Behaviour in Hornsby Shire
    Effects of Sydney Coastal Dry Sclerophyll Forest Litter on Fuels and Fire Behaviour in Hornsby Shire Angela G. Gormley A thesis submitted to fulfil requirements for the degree of Master of Philosophy School of Life and Environmental Sciences Faculty of Science The University of Sydney February 2019 ii Angela G. Gormley iii O! for a muse of fire, that would ascend the brightest heaven of invention Prologue The Life of King Henry V William Shakespeare iv Acknowledgements Most universities ban their students from setting fire to litter on the campus so it was necessary to transfer to the School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, halfway through my degree. My supervisors, Assoc. Prof. Tina Bell and Dr Malcolm Possell, solved all my problems during our first meeting. I appreciate their guidance with my research, their support and, they took my research in an interesting direction. I would like to thank Veronica Quintanilla Berjon for help with the burning experiments. The School of Life and Environmental Sciences provided me with the facilities and equipment that were necessary to support my research. I appreciate the financial assistance and networking opportunities provided by the Bushfire and Natural Hazards Cooperative Research Centre. I appreciate the support of Amelia Jones and Michelle Brown from Hornsby Shire Council because they encouraged me to keep trying when it seemed impossible for my research to continue. They assisted me with access to sites, maps, accompanied me on my field trips and provided a lot of useful information. I would like to thank students and staff at the School of Life and Environmental Sciences and the Sydney Institute of Agriculture, The University of Sydney, because a friendly and sociable environment makes studying more enjoyable.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Methods for Biosecurity Monitoring and Surveillance Author(S) / Address (Es) David Fox, University of Melbourne
    Report Cover Page ACERA Project 0605 Title Statistical Methods for Biosecurity Monitoring and Surveillance Author(s) / Address (es) David Fox, University of Melbourne Material Type and Status (Internal draft, Final Technical or Project report, Manuscript, Manual, Software) Final Report Summary This report investigates the applicability of traditional methods of analysing surveillance data to biosecurity risks, and explores some more recent innovations designed to detect subtle trends and anomalous behaviour in data over space and time. In particular, it examines control charting and syndromic surveillance methods, and explores how useful they are likely to be in dealing with typical biosecurity disease and pest surveillance. If focuses on disease detection, and methods for optimising surveillance networks and robust methods for minimising levels of inspection. This work provides a proof of concept of these approaches. The case studies, while based on real contexts, are intended only to be illustrative. If the tools are considered to be potentially useful, the next stage would involve development of specific applications to trial their utility. Received By: Date: ACERA Use only ACERA / AMSI SAC Approval: Date: DAFF Endorsement: ( ) Yes ( ) No Date: AUSTRALIAN CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE FOR RISK ANALYSIS Project 06-05 Statistical Methods for Biosecurity Monitoring and Surveillance Page | i THE AUSTRALIAN CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE FOR RISK ANALYSIS Statistical Methods for Biosecurity Monitoring & Surveillance DAVID R. FOX 2009 The University of Melbourne Parkville Victoria 3052 Phone +61 3 8344 7253 • Fax +61 3 8344 6215 Email: [email protected] This report may not be reproduced in part or full by any means without the express written permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Disability Inclusion Action Plans
    DISABILITY INCLUSION ACTION PLANS NSW Local Councils 2018-2019 1 Contents Albury City Council 6 Armidale Regional Council 6 Ballina Shire Council 8 Balranald Shire Council 9 Bathurst Regional Council 9 Bayside Council 11 Bega Valley Shire Council 12 Bellingen Shire Council 14 Berrigan Shire Council 15 Blacktown City Council 16 Bland Shire Council 16 Blayney Shire Council 17 Blue Mountains City Council 19 Bogan Shire Council 21 Bourke Shire Council 21 Brewarrina Shire Council 22 Broken Hill City Council 22 Burwood Council 23 Byron Shire Council 26 Cabonne Shire Council 28 Camden Council 28 Campbelltown City Council 29 Canterbury-Bankstown Council 30 Canada Bay Council (City of Canada Bay) 31 Carrathool Shire Council 31 Central Coast Council 32 Central Darling Council 32 Cessnock City Council 33 Clarence Valley Council 34 Cobar Shire Council 36 Coffs Harbour City Council 37 Coolamon Shire Council 38 Coonamble Shire Council 39 Cootamundra-Gundagai Regional Council 40 Cowra Shire Council 41 Cumberland Council 42 Council progress updates have been Dubbo Regional Council 43 extracted from Council Annual Reports, Dungog Shire Council 44 either in the body of the Annual Report Edward River Council 44 or from the attached DIAP, or from progress updates provided directly via Eurobodalla Shire Council 44 the Communities and Justice Disability Fairfield City Council 46 Inclusion Planning mailbox. Federation Council 47 Forbes Shire Council 47 ACTION PLAN 2020-2022 ACTION 2 Georges River Council 49 Northern Beaches Council 104 Gilgandra Shire Council
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 NSW Landscape Architecture Award Winners
    20 17 NSW Landscape Architecture Awards Principal Corporate Partner Major Corporate Partners Supporting Corporate Partners Principal NSW Partners Major NSW Partners Supporting NSW Partners Jury Report NSW AILA Awards 2017 The NSW 2017 awards jury was a diverse group of 7 landscape architects and urban designers. It consisted of three male and four female jurors and represented academia, government, large and small private practice and the AILA. The jury made the decision to undertake site visits to a select group of projects and found this process essential in fully understanding projects and informing decision making. With the largest number of award entries ever received, the 2017 NSW awards offered a true indication of the breadth of project work being undertaken by landscape architects. There is no doubt that NSW is experiencing a time of massive urban restructuring. Urban centres are densifying, expanding and growing at speed. Grey is threatening green and landscape architects are working on challenges of social equity and environmental resilience across all scales. The debate about open space in the city, how much, what type and where, continues to underpin most strategic investigations, yet the voice is now charged with a growing ‘evidence base’ to argue for better quality, better connectivity and more trees. As urban centres expand and densify, they are also connecting, and mega scaled infrastructure projects are being reconceptualised by landscape architects as catalysts for change. Landscape architects across the state are turning infrastructure projects once seen as environmental threats into vital opportunities for large scale remaking, restoration and environmental stewardship of the vast landscapes which they cross and connect.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Plumbing Regulators in NSW On-Site Plumbing and Drainage Compliance and Inspections
    Local plumbing regulators in NSW On-site plumbing and drainage compliance and inspections This document outlines who performs the functions of the plumbing regulator in NSW. Under the Plumbing and Drainage Act 2011 NSW Fair Trading is the plumbing regulator in New South Wales. The Plumbing Code of Australia is the technical standard for compliance throughout NSW. It is the responsibility of the plumbing regulator in each area to set requirements for inspections of on-site plumbing and drainage. Fair Trading’s area of operation includes all areas in which properties are provided with services (either drinking water, recycled water or a sewerage service) by Sydney Water Corporation or Hunter Water Corporation. This area of operation stretches from Gerringong in the south (the Illawarra), to Newcastle, Port Stephens and Dungog in the north (the Hunter), and west to Mount Victoria (Blue Mountains). The function of the plumbing regulator has been delegated by Fair Trading to local councils, county councils, or other qualified bodies. The delegation of the function has been accepted by local and county councils across NSW, with a small number of exceptions where the council declined the delegation. Below are two tables identifying the local authority for plumbing regulator functions, including conducting inspections, throughout NSW by local government area. Please Note: Onsite plumbing and drainage work does not include stormwater, fire suppression; work on network utility assets or roof plumbing. If you are a plumber or drainer in regional
    [Show full text]
  • New M5 EIS Vol 2H App S Biodiversity Assessment
    New M5 Environmental Impact Statement Biodiversity Assessment Report Appendix S November 2015 WestConnex The New M5: Biodiversity Assessment Report DOCUMENT TRACKING Item Detail Project Name The New M5 Environmental Impact Assessment Project Number 14SYD_349 Meredith Henderson Project Manager 02 8536 8650 299 Sussex Street Sydney, NSW 2000 Prepared by Matthew Dowle, Meredith Henderson, Danielle Adams-Bennett Reviewed by Ryan Smithers Approved by Mark Adams Status FINAL Version Number 8 Last saved on 19 November 2015 This report should be cited as ‘Eco Logical Australia 2015. The New M5 - Biodiversity Assessment Report. Prepared for Roads and Maritime Services of NSW.’ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document has been prepared by Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd with support from Roads and Maritime Services of NSW and AECOM. Disclaimer This document may only be used for the purpose for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the contract between Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd and Roads and Maritime Services of NSW. The scope of services was defined in consultation with Roads and Maritime Services of NSW, by time and budgetary constraints imposed by the client, and the availability of reports and other data on the subject area. Changes to available information, legislation and schedules are made on an ongoing basis and readers should obtain up to date information. Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report and its supporting material by any third party. Information provided is not intended to be a substitute for site specific assessment or legal advice in relation to any matter.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Assessment Report, Heathcote Ridge, West Menai
    STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT REPORT HEATHCOTE RIDGE, WEST MENAI November 2012 Prepared for Gandangara Local Aboriginal Land Council By Cumberland Ecology with input from BBC Consulting Planners and 1. PURPOSE AND DESCRIPTION .......................................................................... 3 1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 3 1.1.1 Background........................................................................................................... 3 1.2 The Program ..................................................................................................... 4 1.2.1 Background........................................................................................................... 4 1.2.2 Proposed Development Concept ..................................................................... 5 1.3 Regional Context ............................................................................................. 12 1.4 Land Use Planning .......................................................................................... 13 1.4.1 Land to Which the SEPP Amendment will Apply ............................................ 13 1.4.2 Proposed Land Use Zones ................................................................................. 13 1.4.3 Principal Development Standards ................................................................... 14 1.4.4 Consent Authority ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology of Pyrmont Peninsula 1788 - 2008
    Transformations: Ecology of Pyrmont peninsula 1788 - 2008 John Broadbent Transformations: Ecology of Pyrmont peninsula 1788 - 2008 John Broadbent Sydney, 2010. Ecology of Pyrmont peninsula iii Executive summary City Council’s ‘Sustainable Sydney 2030’ initiative ‘is a vision for the sustainable development of the City for the next 20 years and beyond’. It has a largely anthropocentric basis, that is ‘viewing and interpreting everything in terms of human experience and values’(Macquarie Dictionary, 2005). The perspective taken here is that Council’s initiative, vital though it is, should be underpinned by an ecocentric ethic to succeed. This latter was defined by Aldo Leopold in 1949, 60 years ago, as ‘a philosophy that recognizes[sic] that the ecosphere, rather than any individual organism[notably humans] is the source and support of all life and as such advises a holistic and eco-centric approach to government, industry, and individual’(http://dictionary.babylon.com). Some relevant considerations are set out in Part 1: General Introduction. In this report, Pyrmont peninsula - that is the communities of Pyrmont and Ultimo – is considered as a microcosm of the City of Sydney, indeed of urban areas globally. An extensive series of early views of the peninsula are presented to help the reader better visualise this place as it was early in European settlement (Part 2: Early views of Pyrmont peninsula). The physical geography of Pyrmont peninsula has been transformed since European settlement, and Part 3: Physical geography of Pyrmont peninsula describes the geology, soils, topography, shoreline and drainage as they would most likely have appeared to the first Europeans to set foot there.
    [Show full text]
  • Notations on Section 149 Planning Certificates for Land Affected by the Draft Coastal Management SEPP
    Planning circular PLANNING SYSTEM Part affected notations Circular PS 16-003 Issued 20 July 2016 Related PS 14-003 (13 November 2014) Notations on section 149 planning certificates for land affected by the draft Coastal Management SEPP The purpose of this circular is to provide councils with guidance on how section 149 planning certificates should specify whether land is affected by the draft Coastal Management State Environmental Planning Policy (SEPP). Introduction obligation is in addition to a council’s current obligation to notate matters relating to the existing coastal zone The draft State Environmental Planning Policy under clauses 1(1) and 7 of Schedule 4 to the EP&A (Coastal Management) 2016 (Coastal Management Regulation on planning certificates under section SEPP) will map the four coastal management areas 149(2) of the EP&A Act. (CMA) that comprise the proposed coastal zone under the Coastal Management Act 2016. These are the Planning Certificates: Information under Coastal Wetlands and Littoral Rainforests Area, the Section 149(2) Coastal Environment Area, the Coastal Use Area and the Coastal Vulnerability Area. The information to be included in a planning certificate under section 149(2) of the EP&A Act is prescribed by The mapping will be based on values and features, clause 279 of the Environmental Planning and modelling, or defined distances. Some lots may be Assessment Regulation 2000 (EP&A Regulation) and partially covered by a CMA whilst others will be wholly set out in Schedule 4 to the EP&A Regulation. within a CMA. The draft Coastal Management SEPP also identifies development controls that apply to land Environmental planning instruments within a CMA.
    [Show full text]