DOCSLIB.ORG

G-Protein Coupled Receptor BAI3 Promotes Myoblast Fusion in Vertebrates

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
G-Protein Coupled Receptor BAI3 Promotes Myoblast Fusion in Vertebrates G-protein coupled receptor BAI3 promotes myoblast fusion in vertebrates Noumeira Hamouda,b, Viviane Trana,c, Louis-Philippe Croteaua,b, Artur Kaniaa,b,d,e, and Jean-François Côtéa,b,c,d,e,1 aInstitut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada H2W 1R7; bProgrammes de Biologie Moléculaire, Département de Médecine and cDépartement de Biochimie, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada H3T 1J4; and dDivision of Experimental Medicine and eDepartments of Biology and Anatomy and Cell Biology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada H3A 1A3 Edited by Margaret Buckingham, Pasteur Institute, Paris, France, and approved January 24, 2014 (received for review July 25, 2013) Muscle fibers form as a result of myoblast fusion, yet the cell demonstrated that the myoblast fusion function of DOCK1 surface receptors regulating this process are unknown in verte- (ortholog of MBC) is conserved from flies to mice (22). Extending brates. In Drosophila, myoblast fusion involves the activation of this observation, conditional inactivation of Rac1 or N-WASP in the Rac pathway by the guanine nucleotide exchange factor Myo- developing mouse myoblasts was shown to impair fusion, further blast City and its scaffolding protein ELMO, downstream of cell- supporting an essential and evolutionarily conserved role for surface cell-adhesion receptors. We previously showed that the these genes in the fusion process (23, 24). However, mammalian mammalian ortholog of Myoblast City, DOCK1, functions in an evo- orthologs of fly profusion receptors, Nephrin and Neph proteins, lutionarily conserved manner to promote myoblast fusion in mice. In do not appear to be key regulators of primary myoblast fusion in search for regulators of myoblast fusion, we identified the G-protein mice (25, 26). Myomaker, or Transmembrane protein 8C, was coupled receptor brain-specific angiogenesis inhibitor (BAI3) as a cell recently shown to be essential for myoblast fusion, but its precise surface protein that interacts with ELMO. In cultured cells, BAI3 or function remains to be defined (27). A number of cell adhesion ELMO1/2 loss of function severely impaired myoblast fusion without proteins and promigratory receptors, including Integrin β1, affecting differentiation and cannot be rescued by reexpression of Talin1/2, CDON/Brother of CDON and M-/N-Cadherins are BAI3 mutants deficient in ELMO binding. The related BAI protein implicated in myoblast fusion in cell culture models, and in family member, BAI1, is functionally distinct from BAI3, because it vivo studies also support a contribution of Integrin β1and cannot rescue the myoblast fusion defects caused by the loss of BAI3 Talin1/2 to fusion (28–32). Recently, activation of the brain- function. Finally, embryonic muscle precursor expression of a BAI3 specific angiogenesis inhibitor 1 (BAI1) receptor by apoptotic cells mutant unable to bind ELMO was sufficient to block myoblast fusion residing in regenerating muscles was shown to promote myoblast in vivo. Collectively, our findings provide a role for BAI3 in the relay fusion in muscle repair (33). Thus, the canonical cell surface of extracellular fusion signals to their intracellular effectors, identi- receptors that control vertebrate primary myoblast fusion through fying it as an essential transmembrane protein for embryonic verte- – brate myoblast fusion. the conserved DOCK1 Rac pathway have remained elusive. BAI proteins belong to the cell adhesion subfamily of G-protein myotube formation | myogenesis | model system | ced-12 | RhoGTP coupled receptors (GPCRs) and are characterized by long ex- tracellular domains (ECDs) and intracellular domains (ICDs) (34). BAI3 regulates synapse density by binding to C1q-like he identity of molecular networks that control embryonic proteins, a family of small secreted proteins highly expressed in myogenesis and adult muscle regeneration is being unraveled T the brain, via its Thrombospondin repeats (TSRs) (34). BAI1 (1). The intricacy of such networks reflects the complicated cascade recruits ELMO/DOCK1 and acts as an apoptotic cell clearance of events underlying muscle development: myoblasts and satellite receptor by engaging phosphatidylserine exposed on the outer cells are first specified from precursors, then migrate to a precise leaflet of dying cells via its TSRs (35). Recent data demonstrated BIOLOGY location where they proliferate and fuse, and finally differentiate into postmitotic myofibers (2). Myoblast fusion is a critical step for DEVELOPMENTAL Significance the formation of embryonic muscle fibers, determines muscle size, and controls adult muscle regeneration (2), but its initiation re- mains poorly understood in vertebrates (3). Myoblast fusion is essential for multinucleated muscle fiber Dro- Genetic studies in Drosophila were instrumental in identifying formation. Regulators of fusion have been identified in sophila the molecules that control myoblast fusion by relaying signals , but the molecular mechanisms controlling vertebrate from the cell surface to the actin cytoskeleton (2). Cell adhesion myoblast fusion are poorly understood. We describe here receptors are expressed on two genetically distinguishable cell previously unidentified in vivo functional evidence that the populations of founder and fusion-competent myoblasts and are G-protein coupled receptor brain-specific angiogenesis in- hibitor (BAI3) is a receptor controlling myoblast fusion in critical to promote myoblast fusion (2). Dumbfounded/Kin-of-IrreC developing vertebrate muscles. We show that BAI3 binds the and Roughest/Irregular-optic-chiasma-C are expressed on the intracellular effector of myoblast fusion ELMO/DOCK1 and that founder myoblasts and associate with Stick and Stones and this binding is obligatory for fusion. Using in vivo manipulations Hibris found at the surface of fusion-competent myoblasts to – in the chicken embryo, we demonstrate that BAI3 binding to trigger intracellular signaling cascades leading to fusion (4 7). ELMO is essential for myoblast fusion. These experiments The signaling intermediates include scaffold proteins (ELMO, – identify BAI3 as a long-sought-after receptor controlling verte- Blown Fuse, Antisocial) (8 10), kinase (p21-activated kinase) brate myoblast fusion. (11), guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) [Myoblast City (MBC), Loner] (12, 13), GTPase (Rac), (14) and actin nucleation Author contributions: J.-F.C. designed research; N.H., V.T., and L.-P.C. performed research; regulators (Kette, WAVE, WASP, WASP-interacting protein) N.H., V.T., L.-P.C., A.K., and J.-F.C. analyzed data; and A.K. and J.-F.C. wrote the paper. (15–19). Some of these proteins ultimately promote the formation The authors declare no conflict of interest. of actin-driven podosome-like structures in the fusion-competent This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. cells that invade founder cells for membrane fusion (20, 21). 1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]. These findings raise the question of the identity of in vivo This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10. regulators of myoblast fusion in vertebrates. Previously, we 1073/pnas.1313886111/-/DCSupplemental. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1313886111 PNAS | March 11, 2014 | vol. 111 | no. 10 | 3745–3750 Downloaded by guest on September 27, 2021 the presence of a GPCR–Autoproteolysis Inducing domain A 7 TM 1462 1509 (GAIN) in ECDs of some cell adhesion GPCRs that is involved TSR in autoproteolysis (36). In cancer cells, the BAI1 ECD is shed RGD 12345HBD GAIN and cleaved into smaller fragments that display antiangiogenic BAI1 properties (37). 1387 1563 Here, we present evidence for the identity of a transmembrane 1406 1452 protein that orchestrates myoblast fusion by relaying cell surface TSR 7 TM signals to the underlying cytoskeleton. We identify the GPCR 2345 HBD GAIN BAI3 as an interactor of ELMO/DOCK1 in myoblasts, whose BAI3 down-regulation in cultured myoblasts abolishes fusion. Rescue 1312 1499 experiments demonstrate that BAI3 engages the ELMO/DOCK1 pathway to mediate myoblast fusion. Finally, we show that in- C B B42 LexA terfering in vivo with BAI3’s ability to interact with ELMO im- Time (h) 0 24 48 72 +Leu paired primary myoblast fusion. Collectively, these results identify DOCK1 -Leu BAI3ICD ELMO11-727 BAI3 as an indispensable protein for myoblast fusion in vivo. ELMO1 ELMO2 BAI3ICD ELMO11-495 Results BAI2 ICD 532-727 GPCR BAI3, an ELMO-Binding Receptor, Is Expressed in Myoblasts. We BAI3 BAI3 ELMO1 reasoned that a myoblast cell surface receptor that binds directly E 1399-1513 1399-1458 to the ELMO/DOCK1 GEF module might relay an extracellular D 1399-1522 BAI1 BAI2 BAI3 signal to the cytoskeleton during fusion in vertebrates. We car- GST BAI3 BAI3 BAI3 Myc-ELMO1 + +++ GST ried out a yeast two-hybrid screen to identify proteins that in- Myc-ELMO1 + +++ 75 teract with ELMO1 and identified two potential candidate 75 transmembrane receptors. One of them is the previously repor- 50 ted ELMO-interacting BAI1 GPCR (35), and the other was the 25 Myc-ELMO1 related receptor BAI3 (Fig. 1A). Identity conservation between F 3OMLE-cyM G individual BAI protein family members is ∼40% and largely 727-31 restricted to the TSRs, GAIN domain, seven transmembrane 532-727 212-727 1-495 1 1-675 1-727 α 1-707 Myc-ELMO2 domains, and a short C-terminal region predicted to be -helical Myc-ELMO1 75 (38). Notably, BAI1 is characterized by five TSRs, whereas BAI2/3 75 GST-BAI3 have only four and additionally lack an Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) motif GST-BAI3 50 A found exclusively on BAI1 (Fig. 1 ). Our yeast two-hybrid screen 75 75 suggests that ELMO1-interacting domains of BAI proteins are in GST α 50 GST the conserved predicted -helical region at the C terminus (Fig. TCL 5% A A 75 1 and Fig. S1 ). 75 Semiquantitative RT-PCR assays were performed to establish TCL 5% which DOCK, ELMO, and BAI members are expressed in C2C12, 50 a myoblast differentiation and fusion model cell line. In these, we detected constant expression levels of DOCK1 and DOCK4 mRNAs, whereas DOCK5 mRNA levels increased upon differen- Fig.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dock3 Protects Myelin in the Cuprizone Model for Demyelination
    Citation: Cell Death and Disease (2014) 5, e1395; doi:10.1038/cddis.2014.357 OPEN & 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 2041-4889/14 www.nature.com/cddis Dock3 protects myelin in the cuprizone model for demyelination K Namekata1, A Kimura1, C Harada1, H Yoshida2, Y Matsumoto1 and T Harada*,1,2 Dedicator of cytokinesis 3 (Dock3) belongs to an atypical family of the guanine nucleotide exchange factors. It is predominantly expressed in the neural tissues and causes cellular morphological changes by activating the small GTPase Rac1. We previously reported that Dock3 overexpression protects retinal ganglion cells from excitotoxic cell death. Oligodendrocytes are the myelinating cells of axons in the central nervous system and these cells are damaged in demyelinating disorders including multiple sclerosis (MS) and optic neuritis. In this study, we examined if Dock3 is expressed in oligodendrocytes and if increasing Dock3 signals can suppress demyelination in a cuprizone-induced demyelination model, an animal model of MS. We demonstrate that Dock3 is expressed in oligodendrocytes and Dock3 overexpression protects myelin in the corpus callosum following cuprizone treatment. Furthermore, we show that cuprizone demyelinates optic nerves and the extent of demyelination is ameliorated in mice overexpressing Dock3. Cuprizone treatment impairs visual function, which was demonstrated by multifocal electroretinograms, an established non-invasive method, and Dock3 overexpression prevented this effect. In mice overexpressing Dock3, Erk activation is increased, suggesting this may at least partly explain the observed protective effects. Our findings suggest that Dock3 may be a therapeutic target for demyelinating disorders including optic neuritis. Cell Death and Disease (2014) 5, e1395; doi:10.1038/cddis.2014.357; published online 28 August 2014 Dedicator of cytokinesis 3 (Dock3), an atypical member of the will restore the visual function.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure of the Dock2âˆ'elmo1 Complex Provides Insights Into
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17271-9 OPEN Structure of the DOCK2−ELMO1 complex provides insights into regulation of the auto-inhibited state Leifu Chang1,7, Jing Yang1, Chang Hwa Jo 2, Andreas Boland 1,8, Ziguo Zhang 1, Stephen H. McLaughlin 1, Afnan Abu-Thuraia 3, Ryan C. Killoran2, Matthew J. Smith 2,4,9, Jean-Francois Côté 3,5,6,9 & ✉ David Barford 1 DOCK (dedicator of cytokinesis) proteins are multidomain guanine nucleotide exchange 1234567890():,; factors (GEFs) for RHO GTPases that regulate intracellular actin dynamics. DOCK proteins share catalytic (DOCKDHR2) and membrane-associated (DOCKDHR1) domains. The structurally-related DOCK1 and DOCK2 GEFs are specific for RAC, and require ELMO (engulfment and cell motility) proteins for function. The N-terminal RAS-binding domain (RBD) of ELMO (ELMORBD) interacts with RHOG to modulate DOCK1/2 activity. Here, we determine the cryo-EM structures of DOCK2−ELMO1 alone, and as a ternary complex with RAC1, together with the crystal structure of a RHOG−ELMO2RBD complex. The binary DOCK2−ELMO1 complex adopts a closed, auto-inhibited conformation. Relief of auto- inhibition to an active, open state, due to a conformational change of the ELMO1 subunit, exposes binding sites for RAC1 on DOCK2DHR2, and RHOG and BAI GPCRs on ELMO1. Our structure explains how up-stream effectors, including DOCK2 and ELMO1 phosphorylation, destabilise the auto-inhibited state to promote an active GEF. 1 MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK. 2 Institute for Research in Immunology and Cancer, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec H3T 1J4, Canada. 3 Montreal Institute of Clinical Research (IRCM), Montréal, QC H2W 1R7, Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rac/Cdc42 Exchange Factor Complex Promotes Formation of Lateral filopodia and Blood Vessel Lumen Morphogenesis
    ARTICLE Received 1 Oct 2014 | Accepted 26 Apr 2015 | Published 1 Jul 2015 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8286 OPEN A Rac/Cdc42 exchange factor complex promotes formation of lateral filopodia and blood vessel lumen morphogenesis Sabu Abraham1,w,*, Margherita Scarcia2,w,*, Richard D. Bagshaw3,w,*, Kathryn McMahon2,w, Gary Grant2, Tracey Harvey2,w, Maggie Yeo1, Filomena O.G. Esteves2, Helene H. Thygesen2,w, Pamela F. Jones4, Valerie Speirs2, Andrew M. Hanby2, Peter J. Selby2, Mihaela Lorger2, T. Neil Dear4,w, Tony Pawson3,z, Christopher J. Marshall1 & Georgia Mavria2 During angiogenesis, Rho-GTPases influence endothelial cell migration and cell–cell adhesion; however it is not known whether they control formation of vessel lumens, which are essential for blood flow. Here, using an organotypic system that recapitulates distinct stages of VEGF-dependent angiogenesis, we show that lumen formation requires early cytoskeletal remodelling and lateral cell–cell contacts, mediated through the RAC1 guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) DOCK4 (dedicator of cytokinesis 4). DOCK4 signalling is necessary for lateral filopodial protrusions and tubule remodelling prior to lumen formation, whereas proximal, tip filopodia persist in the absence of DOCK4. VEGF-dependent Rac activation via DOCK4 is necessary for CDC42 activation to signal filopodia formation and depends on the activation of RHOG through the RHOG GEF, SGEF. VEGF promotes interaction of DOCK4 with the CDC42 GEF DOCK9. These studies identify a novel Rho-family GTPase activation cascade for the formation of endothelial cell filopodial protrusions necessary for tubule remodelling, thereby influencing subsequent stages of lumen morphogenesis. 1 Institute of Cancer Research, Division of Cancer Biology, 237 Fulham Road, London SW3 6JB, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rhog-Mediated Signaling Pathway That Modulates Invadopodia Dynamics in Breast Cancer Cells Silvia M
    © 2017. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Journal of Cell Science (2017) 130, 1064-1077 doi:10.1242/jcs.195552 RESEARCH ARTICLE A RhoG-mediated signaling pathway that modulates invadopodia dynamics in breast cancer cells Silvia M. Goicoechea, Ashtyn Zinn, Sahezeel S. Awadia, Kyle Snyder and Rafael Garcia-Mata* ABSTRACT micropinocytosis, bacterial uptake, phagocytosis and leukocyte One of the hallmarks of cancer is the ability of tumor cells to invade trans-endothelial migration (deBakker et al., 2004; Ellerbroek et al., surrounding tissues and metastasize. During metastasis, cancer cells 2004; Jackson et al., 2015; Katoh et al., 2006, 2000; van Buul et al., degrade the extracellular matrix, which acts as a physical barrier, by 2007). Recent studies have revealed that RhoG plays a role in tumor developing specialized actin-rich membrane protrusion structures cell invasion and may contribute to the formation of invadopodia called invadopodia. The formation of invadopodia is regulated by Rho (Hiramoto-Yamaki et al., 2010; Kwiatkowska et al., 2012). GTPases, a family of proteins that regulates the actin cytoskeleton. Invadopodia are actin-rich adhesive structures that form in the Here, we describe a novel role for RhoG in the regulation of ventral surface of cancer cells and allow them to degrade the invadopodia disassembly in human breast cancer cells. Our results extracellular matrix (ECM) (Gimona et al., 2008). Formation of show that RhoG and Rac1 have independent and opposite roles invadopodia involves a series of steps that include the disassembly in the regulation of invadopodia dynamics. We also show that SGEF of focal adhesions and stress fibers, and the relocalization of several (also known as ARHGEF26) is the exchange factor responsible of their components into the newly formed invadopodia (Hoshino for the activation of RhoG during invadopodia disassembly.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Basis for Mutual Relief of the Rac Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor DOCK2 and Its Partner ELMO1 from Their Autoinhibited Forms
    Structural basis for mutual relief of the Rac guanine nucleotide exchange factor DOCK2 and its partner ELMO1 from their autoinhibited forms Kyoko Hanawa-Suetsugua, Mutsuko Kukimoto-Niinoa,b, Chiemi Mishima-Tsumagaria, Ryogo Akasakaa, Noboru Ohsawaa, Shun-ichi Sekinea,c, Takuhiro Itoa,c, Naoya Tochioa, Seizo Koshibaa, Takanori Kigawaa,d, Takaho Teradaa,b, Mikako Shirouzua, Akihiko Nishikimib,e,f, Takehito Urunoe, Tomoya Katakaig, Tatsuo Kinashig, Daisuke Kohdah, Yoshinori Fukuib,e,f,1, and Shigeyuki Yokoyamaa,b,c,1 aRIKEN Systems and Structural Biology Center, 1-7-22 Suehiro, Tsurumi, Yokohama 230-0045, Japan; bJapan Science and Technology Agency, Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology, Tokyo 102-0075, Japan; cDepartment of Biophysics and Biochemistry, Graduate School of Science, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan; dTokyo Institute of Technology, 4259 Nagatsuta, Midori, Yokohama 226-8502, Japan; eDivision of Immunogenetics, Department of Immunobiology and Neuroscience, Medical Institute of Bioregulation, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan; fResearch Center for Advanced Immunology, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan; gDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Institute of Biomedical Science, Kansai Medical University, Osaka 570-8506, Japan; and hDivision of Structural Biology, Medical Institute of Bioregulation, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan Edited by John Kuriyan, University of California, Berkeley, CA, and approved December 31, 2011 (received for review September 6, 2011) DOCK2, a hematopoietic cell-specific, atypical guanine nucleotide for the Rho-family GTPases. There are 11 mammalian members exchange factor, controls lymphocyte migration through ras-related (DOCK180, DOCK2-11) of the CDM family. The CDM proteins C3 botulinum toxin substrate (Rac) activation.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Two Signaling Submodules Within the Crkii/ELMO
    Cell Death and Differentiation (2007) 14, 963–972 & 2007 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 1350-9047/07 $30.00 www.nature.com/cdd Identification of two signaling submodules within the CrkII/ELMO/Dock180 pathway regulating engulfment of apoptotic cells A-C Tosello-Trampont1,4, JM Kinchen1,2,4, E Brugnera1,3, LB Haney1, MO Hengartner2 and KS Ravichandran*,1 Removal of apoptotic cells is a dynamic process coordinated by ligands on apoptotic cells, and receptors and other signaling proteins on the phagocyte. One of the fundamental challenges is to understand how different phagocyte proteins form specific and functional complexes to orchestrate the recognition/removal of apoptotic cells. One evolutionarily conserved pathway involves the proteins cell death abnormal (CED)-2/chicken tumor virus no. 10 (CT10) regulator of kinase (Crk)II, CED-5/180 kDa protein downstream of chicken tumor virus no. 10 (Crk) (Dock180), CED-12/engulfment and migration (ELMO) and MIG-2/RhoG, leading to activation of the small GTPase CED-10/Rac and cytoskeletal remodeling to promote corpse uptake. Although the role of ELMO : Dock180 in regulating Rac activation has been well defined, the function of CED-2/CrkII in this complex is less well understood. Here, using functional studies in cell lines, we observe that a direct interaction between CrkII and Dock180 is not required for efficient removal of apoptotic cells. Similarly, mutants of CED-5 lacking the CED-2 interaction motifs could rescue engulfment and migration defects in CED-5 deficient worms. Mutants of CrkII and Dock180 that could not biochemically interact could colocalize in membrane ruffles.
    [Show full text]
  • A Steric-Inhibition Model for Regulation of Nucleotide Exchange Via the Dock180 Family of Gefs
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Current Biology, Vol. 15, 371–377, February 22, 2005, ©2005 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved. DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.050 A Steric-Inhibition Model for Regulation of Nucleotide Exchange via the Dock180 Family of GEFs Mingjian Lu,1 Jason M. Kinchen,3 Kent L. Rossman,4 and cell migration [1, 11]. These include both the cata- Cynthia Grimsley,1,2 Matthew Hall,5 John Sondek,4 lytic Docker domain that is located within the C-terminal Michael O. Hengartner,3 Vijay Yajnik,5 half of Dock180 and mediates nucleotide exchange on and Kodi S. Ravichandran1,* Rac and an approximately 350 amino acid N-terminal 1Beirne Carter Center for Immunology Research region that contains an SH3 domain. To better define Department of Microbiology and the molecular features of this N-terminal region of 2 Department of Pharmacology Dock180, we generated various Dock180 mutants (Fig- University of Virginia ure S1 in the Supplemental Data available with this arti- Charlottesville, Virginia 22908 cle online). Biochemical characterization of these mu- 3 Institute of Molecular Biology tants revealed two ELMO-interacting sites within this University of Zurich region. One interaction is mediated by the binding of 8057 Zurich, Switzerland the Dock180 SH3 domain to the PxxP motif of ELMO 4 Department of Pharmacology (Figure 1A). In addition, a second region adjacent to the University of North Carolina SH3 domain also binds ELMO and was disrupted by a Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599 G171E mutation in Dock180 (Figure 1B; see below for 5 Gastrointestinal Unit description of G171E).
    [Show full text]
  • The DOCK Protein Sponge Binds to ELMO and Functions in Drosophila Embryonic CNS Development
    The DOCK Protein Sponge Binds to ELMO and Functions in Drosophila Embryonic CNS Development Bridget Biersmith1,2, Ze (Cindy) Liu1,2, Kenneth Bauman1, Erika R. Geisbrecht1* 1 Division of Cell Biology and Biophysics, School of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Kansas City, Missouri, United States of America, 2 Ph.D. Program, School of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Kansas City, Missouri, United States of America Abstract Cell morphogenesis, which requires rearrangement of the actin cytoskeleton, is essential to coordinate the development of tissues such as the musculature and nervous system during normal embryonic development. One class of signaling proteins that regulate actin cytoskeletal rearrangement is the evolutionarily conserved CDM (C. elegans Ced-5, human DOCK180, Drosophila Myoblast city, or Mbc) family of proteins, which function as unconventional guanine nucleotide exchange factors for the small GTPase Rac. This CDM-Rac protein complex is sufficient for Rac activation, but is enhanced upon the association of CDM proteins with the ELMO/Ced-12 family of proteins. We identified and characterized the role of Drosophila Sponge (Spg), the vertebrate DOCK3/DOCK4 counterpart as an ELMO-interacting protein. Our analysis shows Spg mRNA and protein is expressed in the visceral musculature and developing nervous system, suggesting a role for Spg in later embryogenesis. As maternal null mutants of spg die early in development, we utilized genetic interaction analysis to uncover the role of Spg in central nervous system (CNS) development. Consistent with its role in ELMO-dependent pathways, we found genetic interactions with spg and elmo mutants exhibited aberrant axonal defects. In addition, our data suggests Ncad may be responsible for recruiting Spg to the membrane, possibly in CNS development.
    [Show full text]
  • De-Repression of the RAC Activator ELMO1 in Cancer Stem Cells
    RESEARCH ARTICLE De-repression of the RAC activator ELMO1 in cancer stem cells drives progression of TGFb-deficient squamous cell carcinoma from transition zones Heather A McCauley1*, Ve´ ronique Chevrier2, Daniel Birnbaum2, Ge´ raldine Guasch1,2* 1Division of Developmental Biology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, United States; 2Centre de Recherche en Cance´rologie de Marseille (CRCM), Inserm, U1068, F-13009, CNRS, UMR7258, F-13009, Institut Paoli- Calmettes, F-13009, Aix-Marseille University, UM 105, F-13284, Marseille, France Abstract Squamous cell carcinomas occurring at transition zones are highly malignant tumors with poor prognosis. The identity of the cell population and the signaling pathways involved in the progression of transition zone squamous cell carcinoma are poorly understood, hence representing limited options for targeted therapies. Here, we identify a highly tumorigenic cancer stem cell population in a mouse model of transitional epithelial carcinoma and uncover a novel mechanism by which loss of TGFb receptor II (Tgfbr2) mediates invasion and metastasis through de-repression of ELMO1, a RAC-activating guanine exchange factor, specifically in cancer stem cells of transition zone tumors. We identify ELMO1 as a novel target of TGFb signaling and show that restoration of Tgfbr2 results in a complete block of ELMO1 in vivo. Knocking down Elmo1 impairs metastasis of carcinoma cells to the lung, thereby providing insights into the mechanisms of progression of *For correspondence: Heather. Tgfbr2-deficient invasive transition zone squamous cell carcinoma. [email protected] (HAM); DOI: 10.7554/eLife.22914.001 geraldine.guasch-grangeon@ inserm.fr (GG) Competing interests: The authors declare that no Introduction competing interests exist.
    [Show full text]
  • The Intermolecular Interaction of Ephexin4 Leads to Autoinhibition by Impeding Binding of Rhog
    cells Article The Intermolecular Interaction of Ephexin4 Leads to Autoinhibition by Impeding Binding of RhoG Kwanhyeong Kim 1,2, Juyeon Lee 1,2, Hyunji Moon 1,2, Sang-Ah Lee 1, Deokhwan Kim 1,2, Susumin Yang 1, Dae-Hee Lee 3, Gwangrog Lee 1 and Daeho Park 1,2,* 1 School of Life Sciences and Aging Research Institute, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju 61005, Korea; [email protected] (K.K.); [email protected] (J.L.); [email protected] (H.M.); [email protected] (S.-A.L.); [email protected] (D.K.); [email protected] (S.Y.); [email protected] (G.L.) 2 Research Center for Cellular Homeostasis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Korea 3 Department of Oncology, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul 08308, Korea; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-62-715-2890 Received: 27 September 2018; Accepted: 9 November 2018; Published: 15 November 2018 Abstract: Ephexin4 is a guanine nucleotide-exchange factor (GEF) for RhoG and is involved in various RhoG-related cellular processes such as phagocytosis of apoptotic cells and migration of cancer cells. Ephexin4 forms an oligomer via an intermolecular interaction, and its GEF activity is increased in the presence of Elmo, an Ephexin4-interacting protein. However, it is uncertain if and how Ephexin4 is autoinhibited. Here, using an Ephexin4 mutant that abrogated the intermolecular interaction, we report that this interaction impeded binding of RhoG to Ephexin4 and thus inhibited RhoG activation. Mutation of the glutamate residue at position 295, which is a highly conserved residue located in the region of Ephexin4 required for the intermolecular interaction, to alanine (Ephexin4E295A) disrupted the intermolecular interaction and increased binding of RhoG, resulting in augmented RhoG activation.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Role of the BAI Subfamily of Adhesion G Protein-Coupled Receptors (Gpcrs) in Pathological and Physiological Conditions
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Review Understanding the Role of the BAI Subfamily of Adhesion G Protein-Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) in Pathological and Physiological Conditions Sun Young Moon 1, Seong-Ah Shin 1, Yong-Seok Oh 2 , Hyun Ho Park 3 and Chang Sup Lee 1,* 1 College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea; [email protected] (S.Y.M.); [email protected] (S.-A.S.) 2 Department of Brain-Cognitive Sciences, Daegu-Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology (DGIST), Hyeonpung-myeon, Dalseong-gun, Daegu 42988, Korea; [email protected] 3 College of Pharmacy, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-55-772-2432 Received: 22 October 2018; Accepted: 28 November 2018; Published: 30 November 2018 Abstract: Brain-specific angiogenesis inhibitors (BAIs) 1, 2, and 3 are members of the adhesion G protein-coupled receptors, subfamily B, which share a conserved seven-transmembrane structure and an N-terminal extracellular domain. In cell- and animal-based studies, these receptors have been shown to play diverse roles under physiological and pathological conditions. BAI1 is an engulfment receptor and performs major functions in apoptotic-cell clearance and interacts (as a pattern recognition receptor) with pathogen components. BAI1 and -3 also participate in myoblast fusion. Furthermore, BAI1–3 have been linked to tumor progression and neurological diseases. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of the functions of BAI1–3 in pathological and physiological conditions and discuss future directions in terms of the importance of BAIs as pharmacological targets in diseases.
    [Show full text]
  • A GΒΓ Effector, Elmoe, Transduces GPCR
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Developmental Cell Article AGbg Effector, ElmoE, Transduces GPCR Signaling to the Actin Network during Chemotaxis Jianshe Yan,1 Vassil Mihaylov,3 Xuehua Xu,1 Joseph A. Brzostowski,2 Hongyan Li,1 Lunhua Liu,3 Timothy D. Veenstra,4 Carole A. Parent,3 and Tian Jin1,* 1Chemotaxis Signal Section 2Laboratory of Immunogenetics Imaging Facility National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD 20852, USA 3Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA 4Laboratory of Proteomics and Analytical Technologies, Advanced Technology Program, SAIC-Frederick, National Cancer Institute at Frederick, Frederick, MD 21702, USA *Correspondence: [email protected] DOI 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.11.007 SUMMARY ing from existing ones. The growth of the dendritic actin-network pushes the membrane forward, resulting in pseudopod ex- Activation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) tension (Insall and Machesky, 2009; Pollard and Borisy, 2003). leads to the dissociation of heterotrimeric G-proteins The dominant leading front is supported through the suppres- into Ga and Gbg subunits, which go on to regulate sion of errant pseudopods at the sides and rear of the cell by various effectors involved in a panoply of cellular action of the cortical actin/myosin II network (Bosgraaf and van responses. During chemotaxis, Gbg subunits regu- Haastert, 2006; Isik et al., 2008). In neutrophils, chemokines acti- late actin assembly and migration, but the protein(s) vate Rac1 and Rac2 to induce the growth of actin-filaments by removing capping proteins and stimulating the Arp2/3 complex, linking Gbg to the actin cytoskeleton remains un- respectively (Sun et al., 2007).
    [Show full text]