Characterizing Mobile In-App Targeted Ads

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Characterizing Mobile In-App Targeted Ads MAdScope: Characterizing Mobile In-App Targeted Ads Suman Nath Microsoft Research [email protected] ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION Advertising is the primary source of revenue for many mo- In-app advertising is a key economic driver in mobile app bile apps. One important goal of the ad delivery process is ecosystem, funding a wide variety of free apps. Gartner targeting users, based on criteria like users' geolocation, con- predicts the mobile ad market to grow to $13.5 billion in text, demographics, long-term behavior, etc. In this paper 2015 [9]. The growth is primarily due to increasing engage- we report an in-depth study that broadly characterizes what ment of users with apps|users are reported to spend signif- targeting information mobile apps send to ad networks and icantly more time on mobile apps than on traditional web, how effectively, if at all, ad networks utilize the information and the gap is increasing [6]. for targeting users. Our study is based on a novel tool, called Of central importance in the ad delivery process is targeting| MAdScope, that can (1) quickly harvest ads from a large col- the process of selecting specific ads to display to a given user lection of apps, (2) systematically probe an ad network to of an app. In-app ad controls, which fetch ads from backend characterize its targeting mechanism, and (3) emulate user ad networks and display them to users, target users based profiles of specific preferences and interests to study behav- on criteria such as app type, device attributes (e.g., screen ioral targeting. Our analysis of 500K ad requests from 150K size), user's long-term behavior, demographic, and geoloca- Android apps and 101 ad networks indicates that apps do tion. The presumption is that targeting benefits all parties not yet exploit the full potential of targeting: even though in the ad ecosystem: users, app developers, ad networks, ad controls provide APIs to send a lot of information to ad and advertisers. Note that targeting is not unique to in- networks, much key targeting information is optional and is app ads; it has been successfully used for in-browser ads as often not provided by app developers. We also use MAd- well [1, 8, 11, 30]. Scope to systematically probe top 10 in-app ad networks Despite its importance, in-app ad targeting is relatively ill- to harvest over 1 million ads and find that while targeting explored (compared to its in-browser counterpart). Existing is used by many of the top networks, there remain many results on in-browser ads (e.g., [1,3,7,8,11,23,30]) cannot be instances where targeting information or behavioral profile directly generalized to in-app ads for several reasons. First, does not have a statistically significant impact on how ads unlike in-browser ads that cannot easily access user infor- are chosen. We also contrast our findings with a recent study mation because of the same origin policy [29], in-app ads of targeted in-browser ads. run with the same permission as the app itself, making it easier for ad controls to exfiltrate user information. There- Categories and Subject Descriptors fore some targeting information (e.g., user's geolocation) is likely to be used more commonly by in-app ads than by in- C.4 [Performance Of Systems ]: [Measurement tech- browser ads, while some information (e.g., all or frequently niques] used apps on the device) is unique to in-app ads. Second, ad controls often leave much targeting information optional Keywords to be provided by apps, and hence targeting behavior of even the same ad control may vary across apps depending In-app Advertising; Mobile Advertising; Targeted Advertis- on whether apps actually provide the optional targeting in- ing; User Profiles; Measurement formation. Third, some ad networks and advertisers such as mobile marketplaces are unique or more common in in- app ads and their characteristics have not been investigated before. Finally, the methodology for harvesting in-app ads is significantly different from that for harvesting in-browser Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or ads. classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed In this paper, we present a first-of-its-kind study of tar- for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full cita- geted display ads delivered to mobile apps. Our objectives tion on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than are to broadly characterize in-app display advertisement and ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or re- to understand targeting mechanisms employed by apps and publish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]. ad networks from an empirical perspective. The study seeks MobiSys’15, May 18–22, 2015, Florence, Italy. to understand several key questions including the following: Copyright c 2015 ACM 978-1-4503-3494-5/15/05 ...$15.00. What targeting information do apps choose to send to ad http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2742647.2742653 . networks? How effectively, if at all, do different ad networks though the degree of utilization varies widely across net- utilize such information to target users? Do ad networks dif- works. Our results show that in-app ads differ from in- ferentiate between different apps or different users using the browser ads in multiple ways|in-app advertising employs same app, and if so by how much? What impact does tar- significantly less behavioral and demographic-based target- geting have on ad delivery process? ing but more location-based targeting, and it shows more Answers to the above questions are important not just entertainment-related ads. for a general audience inquisitive into in-app ad ecosystem, Surprisingly, our study points out many instances where but also for two important constituents of the ad ecosystem: targeting information or behavioral profile does not have a app developers and ad networks. An app developer can use statistically significant impact on how ads are chosen (within the answers to guide his decisions on what ad networks to our observation window of one day). We are not certain why choose to effectively target users. He can also reduce the ad networks collect targeting information if not for selecting targeting information that the app needs to send to only ads. Three plausible explanations for an ad network to col- the ones that influence targeting decisions, thereby reducing lect such data could be: (1) forward-compatibility|the ad bandwidth and exfiltrated user data. An ad network can network wants keep the option open to select ads based on use the answers to find how often app developers provide a the information in future, and still be compatible to current specific optional targeting information to other ad networks or old versions of its ad controls used by existing apps, (2) and how much targeting opportunity it currently misses by backward-incompatibility|the targeting information is no not supporting the targeting information. longer used by the ad network but is still provided by old An empirical study of in-app ad ecosystem is challenging versions of its ad control, and (3) information brokerage| for various reasons: The vast number of mobile apps that the ad network sells the information to other parties. show display ads, the large number of ad networks that serve We would like to contrast our work with existing works ads to mobile apps, the diversity and dynamics of targeting on in-app ads. Most of the prior work has demonstrated the mechanisms across ad networks and users all present sig- large extent to which apps are capable of collecting user's nificant challenges. Our first contribution in this paper is personal information and the potential implications to user's a novel tool called MAdScope that can address these chal- privacy [12, 17, 20, 24, 26] and device resources [4, 15, 19, 28]. lenges. Central to MAdScope are three key mechanisms to These works do not investigate user targeting. A recent (1) quickly harvest ads from a large collection of apps, (2) work [27] investigates targeting, but in a limited scale and systematically probe an ad network to characterize its tar- scope|it shows various categories of targeted ads shown geting mechanism, and (3) emulate user profiles, i.e., inter- to 100 apps by one ad network, but does not characterize act with the ad ecosystem as if interactions were by users how apps use optional targeting information and how effec- of specific preferences and interests, in order to understand tively ad networks utilize targeting information and behav- if an ad network does behavioral targeting. Various aspects ioral profile. To the best of our knowledge, no prior work of these mechanisms are inspired by recent works on profile- investigates the key questions we investigate in the context based ad crawling [1], differential correlation [16], and ad of in-app ads. classification [27], but adapted to in-app ads. All these ca- In the rest of the paper, we first discuss backgrounds and pabilities are essential for understanding the full spectrum of challenges of measuring in-app ads in Section 2. We then targeting behavior of in-app ad ecosystem. We believe that describe MAdScope's mechanisms and our results charac- MAdScope and its mechanisms will be valuable for future terizing apps (Section 3) and ad networks (Section 4) from studies of in-app ad ecosystem as well.
Recommended publications
  • Adscape: Harvesting and Analyzing Online Display Ads
    Adscape: Harvesting and Analyzing Online Display Ads Paul Barford Igor Canadi Darja Krushevskaja University of University of Rutgers University Wisconsin-Madison Wisconsin-Madison [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Qiang Ma S. Muthukrishnan Rutgers University Rutgers University [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT online users and the increasing amount of time that peo- Over the past decade, advertising has emerged as the pri- ple spend online has led to an estimated $36B in online ad mary source of revenue for many web sites and apps. In spending in the US for FY2012, which represents an 15% this paper we report a first-of-its-kind study that seeks to increase over the previous year [2]. The majority of this broadly understand the features, mechanisms and dynamics spending is on advertising that most commonly appears in of display advertising on the web - i.e., the Adscape. Our search results as text ads. There is, however, a growing pref- study takes the perspective of users who are the targets of erence for display ads | typically image and video ads that display ads shown on web sites. We develop a scalable crawl- appear in response to users' browsing and other activities ing capability that enables us to gather the details of dis- on the web | that can convey more robust and visual mes- play ads including creatives and landing pages. Our crawling sages to users. A recent report by Forrester estimates that strategy is focused on maximizing the number of unique ads $12.7B was spent in the US on display and video advertising harvested.
    [Show full text]
  • Privacy Leakage in Personalized Mobile In-App Ads
    The Price of Free: Privacy Leakage in Personalized Mobile In-App Ads Wei Meng, Ren Ding, Simon P. Chung, Steven Han, and Wenke Lee College of Computing Georgia Institute of Technology {wei, rding, pchung34, s.han}@gatech.edu, [email protected] Abstract—In-app advertising is an essential part of the ecosys- always a concern. While ad personalization has been well tem of free mobile applications. On the surface, this creates a studied for web, relatively little research explores mobile ad win-win situation where app developers can profit from their personalization in terms of what user information is being work without charging the users. However, as in the case of collected. We believe research focused on mobile ad personal- web advertising, ad-networks behind in-app advertising employ ization is a significant pursuit for the following reasons: 1) personalization to improve the effectiveness/profitability of their Mobile devices are a lot more intimate to users; they are ad-placement. This need for serving personalized advertisements in turn motivates ad-networks to collect data about users and carried around at all times and are being used more and more profile them. As such, “free” apps are only free in monetary for sensitive operations like personal communications, dating, terms; they come with the price of potential privacy concerns. banking, etc. Therefore, privacy concerns regarding what infor- The question is, how much data are users giving away to pay for mation is collected for ad personalization are more serious. 2) “free apps”? Unlike in-browser advertising, where the advertisement content is strictly isolated from the rest of the displayed page by the In this paper, we study how much of the user’s interest and demographic information is known to these major ad networks well-known “same origin policy”, in-app advertising operates on the mobile platform.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Acquires Massive, Inc
    S T A N F O R D U N I V E R S I T Y! 2 0 0 7 - 3 5 3 - 1! W W W . C A S E W I K I . O R G! R e v . M a y 2 9 , 2 0 0 7 MICROSOFT ACQUIRES MASSIVE, INC. May 4th, 2006 T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S 1. Introduction 2. Industry Overview 2.1. The Advertising Opportunity Within Video Games 2.2. Market Size and Demographics 2.3. Video Games and Advertising 2.4. Market Dynamics 3. Massive, Inc. ! Company Background 3.1. Founding of Massive 3.2. The Financing of Massive 3.3. Product Launch / Technology 3.4. The Massive / Microsoft Deal 4. Microsoft, Inc. within the Video Game Industry 4.1. Role as a Game Publisher / Developer 4.2. Acquisitions 4.3. Role as an Electronic Advertising Network 4.4. Statements Regarding the Acquisition of Massive, Inc. 5. Exhibits 5.1. Table of Exhibits 6. References ! 2 0 0 7 - 3 5 3 - 1! M i c r o s o f t A c q u i s i t i o n o f M a s s i v e , I n c .! I N T R O D U C T I O N In May 2007, Microsoft Corporation was a company in transition. Despite decades of dominance in its core markets of operating systems and desktop productivity software, Mi! crosoft was under tremendous pressure to create strongholds in new market spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Observing and Optimizing Online Ad Assignments
    OBSERVING AND OPTIMIZING ONLINE AD ASSIGNMENTS BY DARJA KRUŠEVSKAJA A dissertation submitted to the Graduate School—New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in Computer Science Written under the direction of S. Muthukrishnan and approved by New Brunswick, New Jersey October, 2015 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Observing and Optimizing Online Ad Assignments by Darja Kruševskaja Dissertation Director: S. Muthukrishnan The main focus of this thesis work is on optimization and observation of ad assignments in online ad markets. Online ad markets allocate billions of impressions to advertisers while satisfying an array of constraints. Their revenues support the Internet ecosystem. They highlight theory problems and inspire systems research. In this thesis work we initiate the study that seeks to understand mechanisms and dynamics of advertising markets. We develop a scalable crawling capability that allows us to harvest a corpus of ads across a large number of websites and user profiles. We establish that user profile is essential in display ad markets: 50% of observed websites have at least 80% of their ads targeted at profiles. Further, we introduce cardinal auctions for selling multiple copies of a good, in which bidders specify not only their bid or how much they are willing to pay for the good, but also a cardinality constraint on the maximum size of the allocation in which they are willing to participate. We perform the first known analyses of Price of Anarchy and revenue of cardinal auctions. Finally, we introduce a new class of online allocation problems with secondary metrics, in which the goal is to optimize one metric (e.g., revenue), while meeting another (e.g., cost of user conversion).
    [Show full text]
  • An Empirical Study of Mobile Ad Targeting
    An Empirical Study of Mobile Ad Targeting Theodore Book Dan S. Wallach Rice University Rice University Abstract of Android advertising libraries to access permission- protected user data [15, 31, 22, 6] as well as the behavior Advertising, long the financial mainstay of the web of applications that directly pass user private information ecosystem, has become nearly ubiquitous in the world to their ad libraries [7]. What remains little understood of mobile apps. While ad targeting on the web is fairly is the way that information is used after it has been col- well understood, mobile ad targeting is much less stud- lected. ied. In this paper, we use empirical methods to collect In this work, we measure a more complex factor that a database of over 225,000 ads on 32 simulated devices is also critical to the understanding of user privacy—the hosting one of three distinct user profiles. We then ana- interaction between advertising libraries and their host lyze how the ads are targeted by correlating ads to poten- servers. Because we do not have direct access to the pro- tial targeting profiles using Bayes’ rule and Pearson’s chi prietary algorithms used in processing ad requests and squared test. This enables us to measure the prevalence serving advertisements, we choose to treat the data center of different forms of targeting. We find that nearly all ads as a black box, observing the relationship between inputs show the effects of application- and time-based targeting, (ad requests) and outputs (provided ads). This resembles while we are able to identify location-based targeting in the methodology used by other researchers in measuring 43% of the ads and user-based targeting in 39%.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Screens Reader and Sabine Niederer 2 Urban Screens Reader 3
    EDITED BY SCOTT MCQUIRE, MEREDITH MARTIN URBAN SCREENS Reader AND SABINE NIEDERER 2 URBAN SCREENS Reader 3 Urban Screens Reader Editors: Scott McQuire, Meredith Martin and Sabine Niederer Editorial Assistance: Geert Lovink and Elena Tiis Copy Editing: Michael Dieter and Isabelle de Solier Design: Katja van Stiphout Printer: Raamwerken Printing & Design, Enkhuizen Publisher: Institute of Network Cultures, Amsterdam 2009 ISBN: 978-90-78146-10-0 Contact Institute of Network Cultures Phone: +3120 5951866 EDITED BY Fax: +3120 5951840 SCOTT MCQUIRE, Email: info@networkcultures MEREDITH MARTIN Web: http://www.networkcultures.org AND SABINE NIEDERER INC READer #5 Order a copy of this book by sending an email to: [email protected] A pdf of this publication can be downloaded freely at: http://www.networkcultures.org/publications Join the Urban Screens mailing list at: http://www.listcultures.org Join the International Urban Screens Association at: http://www.urbanscreensassoc.org Supported by: the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science in collaboration with Virtueel Platform, the Faculty of Arts, University of Melbourne, the School for Com- munication and Design at the Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, MediaLAB Amsterdam and the International Urban Screens Association. The editors would also like to acknowledge the assistance of the Australian Research Council LP0989302 in supporting this research. Special thanks to all the authors for their contributions, and to Michael Dieter for his careful copy-editing. This publication is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial No Derivative Works 2.5 Netherlands License. To view a copy of this license, visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/nl/deed.en No article in this reader may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means without permission in writing from the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Kober V. Google
    Case 5:20-cv-08336 Document 1-1 Filed 11/25/20 Page 1 of 35 EXHIBIT A Case 5:20-cv-08336 Document 1-1 Filed 11/25/20 Page 2 of 35 1 BOTTINI & BOTTINI, INC. 2 Anne B. Beste (SBN 326881) 3 [email protected] Albert Y. Chang (SBN 296065) 4 [email protected] 5 Yury A. Kolesnikov (SBN 271173) [email protected] 6 7817 Ivanhoe Avenue, Suite 102 7 La Jolla, California 92037 Telephone: (858) 914-2001 8 Facsimile: (858) 914-2002 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Class 10 11 SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 12 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 13 14 AMOS KOBER, on behalf of himself Case No. 15 and all others similarly situated, CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT: 16 Plaintiff, (1) THE CARTWRIGHT ACT 17 (CAL. BUS. & PROF. CODE § v. 16720); 18 GOOGLE LLC, ALPHABET, INC., (2) UNFAIR COMPETITION 19 and DOES 1-100, LAW (CAL. BUS. & PROF. CODE § 17200 ET SEQ.); AND 20 Defendants. (3) UNJUST ENRICHMENT 21 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT Case 5:20-cv-08336 Document 1-1 Filed 11/25/20 Page 3 of 35 1 Plaintiff, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated (the “Class,” as 2 defined below), files this class-action complaint against Google LLC and Alphabet, Inc. 3 (“Defendants”) for violations of the Cartwright Act and Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code. Plaintiff 4 alleges the following (a) upon personal knowledge with respect to the matters pertaining 5 to Plaintiff; and (b) upon information and belief with respect to all other matters, based 6 upon, among other things, the investigations undertaken by Plaintiff’s counsel.
    [Show full text]
  • A Natural Attitude
    A Natural Attitude A Naturalista’s Hair Journal Spoken from a Salon Owner’s Perspective By Schatzi Hawthorne McCarthy A publication of Schatzi's Design Gallery & Day Spa, LLC A Natural Attitude: A Naturalista’s Hair Journal Spoken from a Salon Owner’s Perspective By Schatzi Hawthorne McCarthy Copyright © 2014-2021, Schatzi Hawthorne McCarthy; cover photo by Varick Taylor of one12images.com. Embrace the beauty of you. This book is dedicated to God, the Creator, for Your grace, mercy and omniscience: “Oh lord, though hast searched me and known me…” (Psalm 139) Thank you for guiding me, naturally and super-naturally, to this path of self-discovery that was your vision for my life. To the beautiful women in my life who have loved me unconditionally and have inspired me to be a natural woman: Grandma Mabel McMillan Aunt Joyce McCullom Woodbury Dear Mother Greta Lois McCullom Hawthorne At the footstool of this matriarchy, my natural attitude was nurtured and grown. Prayerfully, the world can learn from your rich and wise example. To my Dad, the late Retired Maj. Arthur Earl Hawthorne. You were always proud of me. Without your unconditional love, I would never have had the confidence to be the natural woman that I am. My love for you is beyond all understanding! To my beautiful family--Lloyd, Jela-ni, Jamar, who have supported me in all of my lifetime endeavors. I am privileged to walk this journey of life with you and pray that we continue to grow and learn together with hearts full of love and understanding.
    [Show full text]
  • Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT ST.18237.NewAd.SoldCover.indd 1 03/11/10 4:35 PM REDESIGNED REINVENTED REIMAGINED The new Globe—superior, full-colour reproduction and a bold, clean design on a premium semi-gloss stock. With longer time spent and a deeper connection to the content, this will change the way readers engage with the newspaper and your ads. RELEVANT lifestyle content to an engaged audience— each month, Globe Media attracts 1,476,000 influential, affluent female readers, 808,000 of whom are the principal grocery shopper in their household.* Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday DIGITAL enhancements offer integrated sponsorships across multiple platforms. COLOUR on every page. Visit GlobeLink.ca, call 1.800.387.9012 or email [email protected] Globe Media to reach Canada’s most influential consumers. where influence lives *Source: PMB Fall 2010, Age 12+ ST.18154.GlobeandMail.ad.indd 1 01/11/10 3:55 PM B!G LOVE FOR TAXI PHD’S PRESCRIPTION FOR MEDIA GOLD SALTY BARBIE & CELEBRATES AS SCOUTS DDB WINS GET FRESH WITH AGENCY JOE OF THE YEAR (AGAIN) CoverNov10.indd 1 02/11/10 4:13 PM REDESIGNED REINVENTED REIMAGINED The new Globe—superior, full-colour reproduction and a bold, clean design on a premium semi-gloss stock. With longer time spent and a deeper connection to the content, this will change the way readers engage with the newspaper and your ads. RELEVANT lifestyle content to an engaged audience— each month, Globe Media attracts 1,476,000 influential, affluent female readers, 808,000 of whom are the principal grocery shopper in their household.* Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday DIGITAL enhancements offer integrated sponsorships across multiple platforms.
    [Show full text]
  • Computational Advertising: Techniques for Targeting Relevant Ads
    Computational Advertising: Techniques for Targeting Relevant Ads Kushal Dave LTRC International Institute of Information Technology Hyderabad, India [email protected] Vasudeva Varma LTRC International Institute of Information Technology Hyderabad, India [email protected] Boston — Delft Foundations and TrendsR in Information Retrieval Published, sold and distributed by: now Publishers Inc. PO Box 1024 Hanover, MA 02339 United States Tel. +1-781-985-4510 www.nowpublishers.com [email protected] Outside North America: now Publishers Inc. PO Box 179 2600 AD Delft The Netherlands Tel. +31-6-51115274 The preferred citation for this publication is K. Dave and V. Varma. Computational Advertising: Techniques for Targeting Relevant Ads. Foundations and TrendsR in Information Retrieval, vol. 8, no. 4-5, pp. 263–418, 2014. R This Foundations and Trends issue was typeset in LATEX using a class file designed by Neal Parikh. Printed on acid-free paper. ISBN: 978-1-60198-833-1 c 2014 K. Dave and V. Varma All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of the publishers. Photocopying. In the USA: This journal is registered at the Copyright Clearance Cen- ter, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use, or the internal or personal use of specific clients, is granted by now Publishers Inc for users registered with the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC). The ‘services’ for users can be found on the internet at: www.copyright.com For those organizations that have been granted a photocopy license, a separate system of payment has been arranged.
    [Show full text]
  • IDENTIFYING and MITIGATING THREATS from EMBEDDING THIRD-PARTY CONTENT a Dissertation Presented to the Academic Faculty by Wei Me
    IDENTIFYING AND MITIGATING THREATS FROM EMBEDDING THIRD-PARTY CONTENT A Dissertation Presented to The Academic Faculty By Wei Meng In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Computer Science Georgia Institute of Technology August 2017 Copyright © Wei Meng 2017 IDENTIFYING AND MITIGATING THREATS FROM EMBEDDING THIRD-PARTY CONTENT Approved by: Dr. Wenke Lee, Advisor Dr. Giovanni Vigna School of Computer Science Department of Computer Science Georgia Institute of Technology University of California, Santa Barbara Dr. Mustaque Ahamad Dr. Nick Feamster School of Computer Science Department of Computer Science Georgia Institute of Technology Princeton University Dr. Taesoo Kim Date Approved: July 20, 2017 School of Computer Science Georgia Institute of Technology To my parents, and those who have supported me. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Ph.D. dissertation would not exist without the support from a number of people. I would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge them. First of all, I am very grateful to my advisor, Wenke Lee, for his guidance and support through the Ph.D. program. Wenke has been an amazing advisor, who has trained me to become an independent researcher and think critically. When I first started my Ph.D. I was a little bit disappointed that I did not receive much instructions on projects or concrete research topics from him. Instead, Wenke provided me with the freedom and necessary resources to explore my own interests. When I met difficulties in exploring new directions, his insightful feedback helped me overcome many challenges. I learned what top-quality research is through the many debates with him, which I enjoyed a lot.
    [Show full text]
  • Tracing Information Flows Between Ad Exchanges Using Retargeted
    Tracing Information Flows Between Ad Exchanges Using Retargeted Ads Muhammad Ahmad Bashir, Sajjad Arshad, William Robertson, and Christo Wilson, Northeastern University https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity16/technical-sessions/presentation/bashir This paper is included in the Proceedings of the 25th USENIX Security Symposium August 10–12, 2016 • Austin, TX ISBN 978-1-931971-32-4 Open access to the Proceedings of the 25th USENIX Security Symposium is sponsored by USENIX Tracing Information Flows Between Ad Exchanges Using Retargeted Ads Muhammad Ahmad Bashir Sajjad Arshad William Robertson Northeastern University Northeastern University Northeastern University [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Christo Wilson Northeastern University [email protected] Abstract geted based on sensitive Personally Identifiable Informa- tion (PII) [44, 4] or specific kinds of browsing history Numerous surveys have shown that Web users are con- (e.g., visiting medical websites) [41]. Furthermore, some cerned about the loss of privacy associated with online users are universally opposed to online tracking, regard- tracking. Alarmingly, these surveys also reveal that peo- less of circumstance [46, 60, 14]. ple are also unaware of the amount of data sharing that occurs between ad exchanges, and thus underestimate the One particular concern held by users is their digi- privacy risks associated with online tracking. tal footprint [33, 65, 58], i.e., which first- and third- In reality, the modern ad ecosystem is fueled by a flow parties are able to track their browsing history Large- of user data between trackers and ad exchanges. Al- scale web crawls have repeatedly shown that trackers are though recent work has shown that ad exchanges rou- ubiquitous [24, 19], with DoubleClick alone being able tinely perform cookie matching with other exchanges, to observe visitors on 40 of websites in the Alexa Top- these studies are based on brittle heuristics that cannot 100K [11].
    [Show full text]