Richmond Birdwing Conservation Network Newsletter No 22, 2011 NEWSLETTER NO 22 CONTENTS PAGE
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Richmond Birdwing Conservation Network Newsletter
Richmond Birdwing Conservation Network Newsletter No 23, February 2012 THE RICHMOND BIRDWING CONSERVATION NETWORK As a Richmond Birdwing Conservation Network (RBCN) operates under the umbrella of the Wildlife Preservation Society of Queensland (WPSQ), RBCN promotes conservation of the Richmond birdwing butterfly Ornithoptera richmondia , its food plants, Pararistolochia spp. and butterfly habitats. Subscription to RBCN is open to anyone interested in the Richmond birdwing butterfly or insects of conservation concern. RBCN encourages liaison between community members, Catchment and Landcare groups and relevant government authorities. RBCN holds occasional General Meetings, Workshops and Field Days. The RBCN Committee is elected each year to manage day to day activities of the Network. Corridor Coordinators are elected as RBCN contacts for local members and other community groups. RBCN NETWORK COMMITTEE Dr Chris Hosking (Chair) [email protected] Hugh Krenske (RBCN Website) Greg Siepen (Grants) [email protected] [email protected] Ray Seddon (Committee) Richard Bull (Committee) [email protected] [email protected] Dr Ian Gynther Dr Don Sands (Editor Publications) [email protected] [email protected] Corridor Cordinators Dale Borgelt (Brisbane Region) Keth McCosh (Scenic Rim) [email protected] [email protected] Ray Seddon (Sunshine Coast) Richard Bull (Gold Coast-Tamborine) [email protected] [email protected] www.richmondbirdwing.org.au Annual Subscription $15 per annum payable -
Environment and Communications Legislation Committee Answers to Questions on Notice Environment Portfolio
Senate Standing Committee on Environment and Communications Legislation Committee Answers to questions on notice Environment portfolio Question No: 3 Hearing: Additional Estimates Outcome: Outcome 1 Programme: Biodiversity Conservation Division (BCD) Topic: Threatened Species Commissioner Hansard Page: N/A Question Date: 24 February 2016 Question Type: Written Senator Waters asked: The department has noted that more than $131 million has been committed to projects in support of threatened species – identifying 273 Green Army Projects, 88 20 Million Trees projects, 92 Landcare Grants (http://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/resources/3be28db4-0b66-4aef-9991- 2a2f83d4ab22/files/tsc-report-dec2015.pdf) 1. Can the department provide an itemised list of these projects, including title, location, description and amount funded? Answer: Please refer to below table for itemised lists of projects addressing threatened species outcomes, including title, location, description and amount funded. INFORMATION ON PROJECTS WITH THREATENED SPECIES OUTCOMES The following projects were identified by the funding applicant as having threatened species outcomes and were assessed against the criteria for the respective programme round. Funding is for a broad range of activities, not only threatened species conservation activities. Figures provided for the Green Army are approximate and are calculated on the 2015-16 indexed figure of $176,732. Some of the funding is provided in partnership with State & Territory Governments. Additional projects may be approved under the Natinoal Environmental Science programme and the Nest to Ocean turtle Protection Programme up to the value of the programme allocation These project lists reflect projects and funding originally approved. Not all projects will proceed to completion. -
Alejandro M Urzúa*, Gastón J Sotes
J. Chil. Chem. Soc., 53, Nº 1 (2008) ESSENTIAL OIL COMPOSITION OF ARISTOLOCHIA CHILENSIS A HOST PLANT OF BATTUS POLYDAMAS ALEJANDRO M URZÚA*, GASTÓN J SOTES Universidad de Santiago de chile, Facultad de Química y Biología, Departamento de Ciencias del Ambiente, Laboratorio de Química Ecológica, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Casilla 40, Correo-33, Santiago, Chile (Received: 17 December - Accepted: 21 January 2008) ABSTRACT In this communication we report the essential oil composition of Aristolochia chilensis Bridges ex Lindl. fresh leaves. This species is one of the larval food-plants of Battus polydamas Boisd., the only butterfly of the family Papilionidae (Lepidoptera) occurring in Chile. In order to determine possible chemical similarities among several of its host species distributed throughout the continent, we compared these results with data obtained from literature on the composition of other representative Aristolochia species occurring in Argentina, Paraguay, and Brazil. Instead of the expected, it was found that the essential oil of each species considered in this work exhibits a particular characteristic profile. Keywords: Aristolochia chilensis; Aristolochiaceae; monoterpenes; sesquiterpenes; Battus polydamas INTRODUCTION compounds in roots of A. chilensis 8. When standards were not available, mass spectra were compared with published spectrometric data 8,15-17. Also, Kovats Two species represent the family Aristolochiaceae in Chile, Aristolochia index of the peaks were compared with values from the literature 15-17. chilensis Bridges ex Lindl., and Aristolochia bridgesii (Klotzsch) Duch. The former is a summer-deciduous low creeping herb ranging southwards from RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Caldera in Northern Chile (27ºS) to beyond the latitude of Santiago (34ºS), and known by the local names of “oreja de zorro” (fox ear) and “hierba de la A total of 30 compounds were identified (Table 1), constituting 83.7% of Virgen María” (Virgin Mary´s herb)1. -
Sequestration of Aristolochic Acids from Meridic Diets by Larvae of Battus Polydamas Archidamas (Papilionidae: Troidini)
Eur. J. Entomol. 108: 41–45, 2011 http://www.eje.cz/scripts/viewabstract.php?abstract=1585 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) Sequestration of aristolochic acids from meridic diets by larvae of Battus polydamas archidamas (Papilionidae: Troidini) CARLOS F. PINTO1, ALEJANDRO URZÚA2 and HERMANN M. NIEMEYER1* 1Laboratorio de Química Ecológica, Universidad de Chile, Casilla 653, Santiago, Chile 2Laboratorio de Química Ecológica, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Casilla 40, C-33 Santiago, Chile Key words. Lepidoptera, Papilionidae, Battus polydamas archidamas, Aristolochia chilensis, aristolochic acids, sequestration of toxins, uptake of toxins Abstract. Larvae of the butterfly, Battus polydamas archidamas (Papilionidae: Troidini) feed exclusively on aristolochic acid (AAs)-containing Aristolochia species (Aristolochiaceae). The distribution of sequestrated AAs in the tissues (body, integument and osmeterial secretions) of B. polydamas archidamas larvae during their development, when fed on a meridic diet containing either a higher or lower concentration of AAs (AAI and AAII) than occurs naturally in the aerial tissues of their host plant, was determined. Accumulation of AAs in the body and integument was proportional to the weight of larvae and greater in the larvae that fed on the diet containing the higher concentration of AAs. Phenolic AAs (AAIa and AAIVa) not present in the diets were found in all larval tissues examined. Integument and body extracts had a higher AAI/AAII ratio than in the original diet and also a relatively high AAIa/AAIVa ratio, suggesting a preferred AAII to AAIa transformation in those larval tissues. In the osmeterial secretion, the value of the AAI/AAII ratio was similar to that in the diets and the AAIa/AAIVa ratio close to 1, which suggests that hydroxylation of AAI to AAIVa and of AAII to AAIa occur to similar extents. -
Richmond Birdwing Conservation Network Newsletter
Richmond Birdwing Conservation Network Newsletter No 21, June 2011 RICHMOND BIRDWING CONSERVATION NETWORK The Richmond Birdwing Conservation Network (RBCN) is a community- based Group, under the umbrella of the Wildlife Preservation Society of Queensland (WPSQ). RBCN promotes conservation of the Richmond birdwing butterfly Ornithoptera richmondia , its food plants, Pararistolochia spp. and habitats for the butterfly. Subscription to the Network is open to anyone interested in the Richmond birdwing or other insects of conservation concern. RBCN encourages liaison between community members, Catchment and Landcare groups, and relevant local and state government authorities. RBCN hosts General Meetings, Workshops and Field Days. This Newsletter is published by the Wildlife Preservation Society of Queensland. The RBCN Network Committee thanks Lois Hughes for permission to reproduce the delightful illustrations on covers of this series. RBCN OFFICE BEARERS Network Committee Chairman (Acting ) Retiring Chair (2010-11) Hugh Krenske (National Data Base) Greg Siepen (Projects/Grants) [email protected] [email protected] Ray Seddon (Corridor Convenor) Joan Heavey [email protected] [email protected] Chris Hosking (Assist. Editor) Susan Rielly [email protected] [email protected] Dr Ian Gynther (DERM collaboration) Don Sands (Newsletter Editor) [email protected] [email protected] www.richmondbirdwing.org.au Subscriptions ($15 per annum payable to RBCN-WPSQ) and all correspondence to be sent to: The -
Temporal Variation of Aristolochia Chilensis Aristolochic Acids During Spring
Communication Temporal Variation of Aristolochia chilensis Aristolochic Acids during Spring Rocío Santander *, Alejandro Urzúa *, Ángel Olguín and María Sánchez Received: 7 October 2015 ; Accepted: 9 November 2015 ; Published: 13 November 2015 Academic Editor: Derek J. McPhee Facultad de Química y Biología, Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Casilla 40, Correo 33, Santiago 9170022, Chile; [email protected] (Á.O.); [email protected] (M.S.) * Correspondence: [email protected] (R.S.); [email protected] (A.U.); Tel.: +56-2-2718-1155 (R.S.); +56-2-2718-1154 (A.U.) Abstract: In this communication, we report the springtime variation of the composition of aristolochic acids (AAs) in Aristolochia chilensis leaves and stems. The dominant AA in the leaves of all samples, which were collected between October and December, was AA-I (1), and its concentration varied between 212.6 ˘ 3.8 and 145.6 ˘ 1.2 mg/kg and decreased linearly. This decrease occurred in parallel with the increase in AA-Ia (5) concentration from 15.9 ˘ 0.8 mg/kg at the beginning of October to 96.8 ˘ 7.8 mg/kg in mid-December. Both acids are enzymatically related by methylation-demethylation reactions. Other AAs also showed important variations: AA-II (2) significantly increased in concentration, reaching a maximum in the first two weeks of November and subsequently decreasing in mid-December to approximately the October levels. The principal component in the AA mixture of the stems was also AA-I (1); similar to AA-II (2), its concentration increased beginning in October, peaked in the second week of November and subsequently decreased. -
QFC Fauna Report
Fauna Habitat Assessment and EVR Investigations Proposed Alignment for Northern Pipeline Interconnector Stage 2 Palmwoods to Yandina Report Prepared for Southern Regional Water Pipeline Alliance Fauna Habitat Assessment and EVR Species Investigations Proposed Alignment for Northern Pipeline Interconnector Stage 2 Palmwoods to Yandina 21/03/2008 Date 21/03/08 Title Fauna Habitat Assessment and EVR Investigation. Proposed Alignment for Northern Pipeline Interconnector Stage 2 Palmwoods to Yandina. Author/s Bryan Robinson Status Final Report Filed as Northern Pipeline Interconnector EVR Fauna and Habitat Assessment Stage 2 Report 0801 The contents of this report and its appendices may not be used in any form by any party other than the Client. The reproduction, adaptation, use or communication of the information contained within this report may not be used without the written permission of Queensland Fauna Consultancy Pty Ltd. Neither the author/s nor the company (QFC Pty Ltd) accepts any liability or responsibility for the unauthorised use of any part of this document. Queensland Fauna Consultancy Pty Ltd. Page ii Report number 0801 Final Report Fauna Habitat Assessment and EVR Species Investigations Proposed Alignment for Northern Pipeline Interconnector Stage 2 Palmwoods to Yandina 21/03/2008 CONTENTS CONTENTS ................................................................................................................ 1 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................. 3 -
Richmond Birdwing Recovery Network Inc
Newsletter of the Richmond Birdwing Recovery Network Inc. Number 8, April 2007 $4.00 ISSN 1833-86 Richmond Birdwing Recovery Network Newsletter No. 8 April 2007 1 Our cover illustration of a female Richmond birdwing feeding on bottlebrush nectar is from an original painting by Lois Hughes. Prints beautifully reproduced on quality watercolour paper (295 x 210 cm) are available from Lois Hughes (ph. (07) 3206 6229) for $20 per print + postage. The RICHMOND BIRDWING RECOVERY NETWORK INC. since it was launched in 2005, has promoted conservation of the Richmond birdwing butterfly Ornithoptera richmondia , its habitats and food plants. Membership of the Network is open to anyone interested in conserving the Richmond birdwing and other insects of conservation concern. The Network promotes liaison between interested community members, catchment groups and relevant local and state government authorities. The Network holds quarterly General Meetings, occasional Regional or Special Meetings and publishes quarterly, a Newsletter distributed to the members. OFFICE BEARERS 2006/07 President Secretary Don Sands, Dawn Muir c/- RBRN, PO Box 855, c/- RBRN, PO Box 855, Kenmore, Qld 4069 Kenmore, Qld 4069 [email protected] [email protected] Vice President Treasurer Greg Siepen Alan Scott c/- RBRN, PO Box 855, c/- RBRN, PO Box 855, Kenmore, Qld 4069 Kenmore, Qld 4069 [email protected] Councillors Chris Hosking Jan Crossland c/- RBRN, PO Box 855, c/- RBRN, PO Box 855, Kenmore, Qld 4069 Kenmore, Qld 4069 [email protected] [email protected] Hugh Krenske c/- RBRN, PO Box 855, Kenmore, Qld 4069 [email protected] This newsletter is distributed to members of the Richmond Birding Recovery Network Inc . -
Project Report
Project Report Host vines for use in the captive breeding and release program to overcome inbreeding depression in wild populations of the Richmond birdwing butterfly Ornithoptera richmondia Matt Cecil* On behalf of the Richmond Birdwing Conservation Network 16 October 2019 *Wildlife Preservation Society of Queensland, Level 1, 30 Gladstone Road, Highgate Hill Queensland 4101, Australia. Introduction The Richmond birdwing butterfly Ornithoptera richmondia, the largest butterfly in subtropical eastern Australia, is restricted to south-east Queensland and north-east New South Wales, where it favours lowland rainforest supporting the sole, low-elevation larval food plant, the birdwing butterfly vine Pararistolochia praevenosa. In Queensland, the Richmond birdwing is listed as vulnerable under the Nature Conservation Act 1992, although it is not listed under equivalent conservation legislation in New South Wales. Loss and fragmentation of habitat in the region since European settlement has resulted in a reduction in the butterfly’s range of approximately 60%. More insidiously, forest fragmentation has isolated certain birdwing subpopulations, which over time have become inbred. This has resulted in localised extinction events, causing a further contraction in the butterfly’s distribution. In an attempt to counteract these threats to the species, a captive-breeding and release program is being conducted by the Department of Environment and Science (DES) in Queensland, with the support of the Richmond Birdwing Conservation Network (RBCN) and other collaborators. The program, which commenced in 2010, entails selectively mating adult butterflies from different geographic sources to yield progeny with increased genetic diversity for release to the wild at target localities in south-east Queensland where inbreeding is known or suspected to be exerting a negative impact. -
Aristolochia Acuminata and the Richmond Birdwing - Garry Sankowsky
Aristolochia acuminata and the Richmond Birdwing - Garry Sankowsky For ten years I lived on Mt Tamborine where my wife and I operated the Tamborine Mountain Butterfly Farm. Mt Tamborine is prime Richmond Birdwing country and we had the Birdwings breeding in our garden all the time as well as breeding large numbers for the flight cage and sale of specimens and pupae. There has been a lot of hype going around claiming that Aristolochia acuminata (Tagala Pipevine) is not suitable for this species. In all this time I rarely used Pararistolochia praevenosa for one simple reason – it is far too slow growing and takes years to develop into a large vine. I can only imagine that the huge vines that are growing on the mountain are many hundreds of years old. The species I mainly used were A. acuminata and an Aristolochia species from Rabaul that has huge soft leaves, as big as a dinner plate. It is the host plant of Ornithoptera urvillianus. I also used A. indica which has naturalised near Darwin. The problem with the soft leaved species of Aristolochia is the situation in which they are grown. When Birdwing eggs are laid on the younger leaves (and this includes Cairns as well as Richmond Birdwings) the leaf reacts to the glue that holds the egg in place which causes it to weep juices onto the egg. These juices then often go mouldy and the resulting mould kills the egg. This is simply the plant fighting back. Because of this Birdwings have evolved the habit of mostly not laying their eggs directly on the host plant but on the leaves of the plant over which the Aristolochia is growing. -
National Recovery Plan for the Mt Emu She-Oak Allocasuarina Emuina
National recovery plan for the Mt Emu she-oak Allocasuarina emuina Prepared by the Environmental Protection Agency for the Allocasuarina emuina recovery team. National recovery plan for Mt Emu she-oak Allocasuarina emuina Prepared by: Environmental Protection Agency for the Allocasuarina emuina recovery team. © The State of Queensland, Environmental Protection Agency Copyright protects this publication. Except for purposes permitted by the Copyright Act, reproduction by whatever means is prohibited without the prior written permission of the Environmental Protection Agency. Inquiries should be addressed to PO Box 15155, BRISBANE CITY EAST, QLD 4002. Copies may be obtained from the: Executive Director Conservation Services Environmental Protection Agency PO Box 15155 Brisbane City East Qld 4002 Disclaimer: The Environmental Protection Agency/Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service publishes recovery plans to detail the actions needed for the conservation of threatened native wildlife. The attainment of objectives and the provision of funds may be subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, and may also be constrained by the need to address other conservation priorities. Approved recovery actions may be subject to modification due to changes in knowledge and changes in conservation status. This plan is based on an original conservation assessment for Allocasuarina emuina by Halford (1993) and incorporates comments submitted by recovery team members and other stakeholders. Publication reference: This report should be cited as: Environmental Protection Agency (2007). National recovery plan for the Mt Emu she-oak Allocasuarina emuina. Report to Australian Government Department of the Environment and Water Resources. Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service, Brisbane. 1 1 Summary..................................................................................................................3 1.1 Species......................................................................................................................... -
Estudio De La Flora Del Humedal De Mantagua
Año 2010 ESTUDIO DE LA FLORA DEL HUMEDAL DE MANTAGUA Consuelo María Pivcevic Fermandois Diseño Gráfico Profesor guía: Sr. Alejandro Garretón Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Escuela de Arquitetura y Diseño. FLORA HUMEDAL DE MANTAGUA INDICE Prólogo ................................................................................................... p.11 Humedal de Mantagua ........................................................................... p.15 Clasificación Botánica de los organismos vegetales .................................................................. p.17 1.-FAMILIA AIZOACEAE ........................................................................ p.19 1.1.-Carpobrotus chilensis / Doca ....................................................... p.20 2.-FAMILIA ADIANTACEAE .................................................................... p.23 2.1.-Adiantum excisum / Helecho palito negro ...................................... p.24 3.-FAMILIA AMARILIDÄCEAS ................................................................ p.27 3.1.-Rhodophiala advena / Añuñuca ................................................... p.28 4.-FAMILIA ANACARDIACEAE .............................................................. p.31 4.1.-Schinus Polygamus / Huingán ..................................................... p.32 4.2.-Lithraea caustica / Litre ............................................................... p.33 4.3.- Schinus latifolius / Molle ............................................................. p.35 5.-FAMILIA APIACEAE