DOCSLIB.ORG

Martins Creek Rehabilitation Plan (Pine Street Section)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Martins Creek Rehabilitation Plan (Pine Street Section) Martins Creek Rehabilitation Plan (Pine Street Section) Lot 593 CG4508 & Lot 594 CG4508 6 – 8 Pine St Buderim Queensland PF1029 March 2011 Stringybark Consulting PO Box 6275 Mooloolah Valley QLD 4553 M | 0466 490 205 F| (07) 5492 9985 [email protected] www.stringybark.com.au ABN: 23837337164 Project File Number & PF1029 MARTINS CREEK REHAB PLAN Report Title Date Thursday, April 21, 2011 Report Revision Draft “D” Report Principal Authors RS, CM Report Reviewers CM, MM File Location E:\STRINGYBARK\PROJECT FOLDERS\PF1029 MARTINS CREEK REHAB PLAN PINE STREET SECTION\REPORTS & DESIGN DRAWINGS\REPORTING\PF1029 MARTINS CREEK REHAB PLAN.DOCX Report Distribution List Steven Milner – Sunshine Coast Council © Stringybark Consulting 2011 Information provided in this report is subject to copyright laws and is intended for the noted recipient only. This report remains the property of Stringybark Consulting and may not be copied, reproduced or submitted in whole or in part without the express permission of the author. Stringybark Consulting accepts no responsibility for any third party who may use or rely upon the content of this report, without permission. Parts of this report may contain information originally prepared by other parties – in these cases these sources are cited. Contents CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................................................ I LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................................................. III LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................................... III LIST OF PLATES................................................................................................................................................ III 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 BACKGROUND AND REHABILITATION PLAN OBJECTIVES ..................................................................................... 1 1.2 LEGISLATION AND POLICY CONSIDERATIONS .................................................................................................... 2 1.3 METHODOLOGY AND STUDY LIMITATIONS ....................................................................................................... 2 2 SITE DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 SITE LOCATION .......................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 MARTINS CREEK CATCHMENT ....................................................................................................................... 3 2.3 REGIONAL ECOSYSTEM MAPPING .................................................................................................................. 5 2.4 SITE CONDITION......................................................................................................................................... 7 2.5 ENDANGERED, VULNERABLE AND NEAR THREATENED SPECIES ............................................................................ 8 3 REHABILITATION STRATEGY .................................................................................................................. 10 3.1 KEY SITE ISSUES AND REHABILITATION OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................... 10 3.2 RIPARIAN VINE FOREST VALUES .................................................................................................................. 11 3.3 CANOPY REPLACEMENT ............................................................................................................................. 11 4 WEED MANAGEMENT WORKS............................................................................................................... 12 4.1 WEED REMOVAL METHODS ....................................................................................................................... 12 4.2 WEED REMOVAL SEQUENCING ................................................................................................................... 13 4.2.1 Year 1 – Dangerous Canopy Weed Removal Lot 593 ...................................................................... 15 4.2.2 Year 1 – Understorey Weed Removal Lot 593 ................................................................................ 15 4.2.3 Year 2 – Canopy Weed Removal and Understorey Weed Removal Lot 594 ................................... 16 4.2.4 Year 4 – Stem Injection (Round 1) ................................................................................................... 16 4.2.5 Year 5 – Canopy Stem Injection (Round 2) ...................................................................................... 16 4.2.6 Maintenance Weeding (Years 1 – 5) ............................................................................................... 17 4.3 MULCH AND TIMBER REUSE ....................................................................................................................... 18 4.4 FAUNA DETECTION AND PROTECTION DURING WORKS.................................................................................... 18 5 REVEGETATION WORKS ......................................................................................................................... 19 5.1 PIONEER REVEGETATION PLANTINGS (YEARS 1 – 2) ........................................................................................ 19 5.2 SECONDARY REVEGETATION PLANTING (YEAR 3) ............................................................................................ 19 5.3 REHABILITATION AREAS SETOUT AND ACCESS ................................................................................................ 20 5.4 REVEGETATION AREA MAINTENANCE AND MONITORING ................................................................................. 20 5.5 ARTIFICIAL HABITAT - NESTBOXES ............................................................................................................... 22 5.6 FIRE MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................................................. 23 stringybark consulting Rehabilitation Plan Martins Creek Buderim (Pine Street Section) PF1029 i 6 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................................. 24 6.1 ADDITIONAL REPORTING AND MONITORING RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................... 24 7 REFERENCES AND RESOURCES ............................................................................................................... 25 APPENDIX A: SITE SPECIES LISTS .................................................................................................................... 26 APPENDIX B: WEED MANAGEMENT MATRIX ................................................................................................. 29 APPENDIX C: ARBORIST REPORT – TREESAFE PTY LTD .................................................................................... 31 APPENDIX D: REVEGETATION SPECIES LIST .................................................................................................... 32 APPENDIX E: PRELIMINARY IMPLEMENTATION COSTING & PROJECT MANAGEMENT COSTING .................... 33 stringybark consulting Rehabilitation Plan Martins Creek Buderim (Pine Street Section) PF1029 ii List of Figures FIGURE 1- SITE LOCATION ............................................................................................................................................. 3 FIGURE 2 REGIONAL ECOSYSTEM MAPPING FOR SUBJECT SITE .............................................................................................. 6 List of Tables TABLE 1 ADJACENT REGIONAL ECOSYSTEM POLYGON DESCRIPTIONS ...................................................................................... 5 TABLE 2 DESKTOP LIST FOR EVNT SPECIES ....................................................................................................................... 8 TABLE 3 KEY MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................................ 10 TABLE 4 REHABILITATION WORKS PROGRAM .................................................................................................................... 14 TABLE 5 NATIVE PLANTS IDENTIFIED ON SUBJECT SITE (RE 12.3.2 SPECIES) ........................................................................... 26 TABLE 6 ENVIRONMENTAL WEEDS AND INTRODUCED SPECIES IDENTIFIED ON SUBJECT SITE........................................................ 27 TABLE 7 KEY WEED SPECIES AND LEGISLATIVE STATUS ...................................................................................................... 29 TABLE 8 REHABILITATION PLANT SPECIES LIST .................................................................................................................. 32 List of Plates PLATE 1 CREEKLINE CULVERT OUTLETS (UNDER ROAD) LOT 594 ............................................................................................ 4 PLATE 2 VIEW FROM NORTHERN BOUNDARY OF LOT 394 LOOKING WEST TOWARDS
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Richmond Birdwing Conservation Network Newsletter
    Richmond Birdwing Conservation Network Newsletter No 23, February 2012 THE RICHMOND BIRDWING CONSERVATION NETWORK As a Richmond Birdwing Conservation Network (RBCN) operates under the umbrella of the Wildlife Preservation Society of Queensland (WPSQ), RBCN promotes conservation of the Richmond birdwing butterfly Ornithoptera richmondia , its food plants, Pararistolochia spp. and butterfly habitats. Subscription to RBCN is open to anyone interested in the Richmond birdwing butterfly or insects of conservation concern. RBCN encourages liaison between community members, Catchment and Landcare groups and relevant government authorities. RBCN holds occasional General Meetings, Workshops and Field Days. The RBCN Committee is elected each year to manage day to day activities of the Network. Corridor Coordinators are elected as RBCN contacts for local members and other community groups. RBCN NETWORK COMMITTEE Dr Chris Hosking (Chair) [email protected] Hugh Krenske (RBCN Website) Greg Siepen (Grants) [email protected] [email protected] Ray Seddon (Committee) Richard Bull (Committee) [email protected] [email protected] Dr Ian Gynther Dr Don Sands (Editor Publications) [email protected] [email protected] Corridor Cordinators Dale Borgelt (Brisbane Region) Keth McCosh (Scenic Rim) [email protected] [email protected] Ray Seddon (Sunshine Coast) Richard Bull (Gold Coast-Tamborine) [email protected] [email protected] www.richmondbirdwing.org.au Annual Subscription $15 per annum payable
    [Show full text]
  • TML Propagation Protocols
    PROPAGATION PROTOCOLS This document is intended as a guide for Tamborine Mountain Landcare members who wish to assist our regeneration projects by growing some of the plants needed. It is a work in progress so if you have anything to add to the protocols – for example a different but successful way of propagating and growing a particular plant – then please give it to Julie Lake so she can add it to the document. The idea is that our shared knowledge and experience can become a valuable part of TML's intellectual property as well as a useful source of knowledge for members. As there are many hundreds of plants native to Tamborine Mountain, the protocols list will take a long time to complete, with growing information for each plant added alphabetically as time permits. While the list is being compiled by those members with competence in this field, any TML member with a query about propagating a particular plant can post it on the website for other me mb e r s to answer. To date, only protocols for trees and shrubs have been compiled. Vines and ferns will be added later. Fruiting times given are usual for the species but many rainforest plants flower and fruit opportunistically, according to weather and other conditions unknown to us, thus fruit can be produced at any time of year. Finally, if anyone would like a copy of the protocols, contact Julie on [email protected] and she’ll send you one. ………………….. Growing from seed This is the best method for most plants destined for regeneration projects for it is usually fast, easy and ensures genetic diversity in the regenerated landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Diet of the White-Headed Pigeon Columba Leucomela Near Lismore, Northern New South Wales: Fruit, Seeds, Flower Buds, Bark and Grit
    Corella, 2011, 35(3): 107-111 Diet of the White-headed Pigeon Columba leucomela near Lismore, northern New South Wales: fruit, seeds, flower buds, bark and grit D. G. Gosper 39 Azure Avenue, Balnarring, Victoria 3926, Australia Received: 27 May 2010 Gut contents of 18 White-headed Pigeons Columba leucomela, found dead over a four-year period near Lismore in northern New South Wales, comprised fruits and seeds of the invasive plant Camphor Laurel Cinnamomum camphora almost exclusively. Birds frequently ingested Melaleuca quinquenervia bark, which, as far as I am aware, constitutes the fi rst record of consumption of bark in the Columbidae, prompting some interesting hypotheses. It is suggested that bark ingestion may counter potential adverse effects from a diet dominated by Camphor Laurel fruits and seeds, which are reputed to contain toxins. Incidental records of consumption of fl ower buds of indigenous plants and insects (the fi rst such records for this species), and regular drinking from man-made structures such as roof guttering on buildings are detailed. INTRODUCTION surrounding area is a mixture of pasture, remnant riparian rainforest and regrowth forest with extensive areas dominated The White-headed Pigeon Columba leucomela is known to by woody weed species, notably Camphor Laurel and Broad- feed on the fruits and seeds of a number of fl eshy-fruited invasive leaved Privet Ligustrum lucidum, and several house gardens. plants, notably Camphor Laurel Cinnamomum camphora, which has become an important seasonal food source for this species Dead pigeons were collected and crop and gizzard contents in northern New South Wales (NSW) (Frith 1982; Recher and removed during subsequent dissection.
    [Show full text]
  • Bruxner Park Flora Reserve Working Plan
    Bruxner Park Flora Reserve Working Plan Working Plan for Bruxner Park Flora Reserve No 3 Upper North East Forest Agreement Region North East Region Contents Page 1. DETAILS OF THE RESERVE 2 1.1 Introduction 2 1.2 Location 2 1.3 Key Attributes of the Reserve 2 1.4 General Description 2 1.5 History 6 1.6 Current Usage 8 2. SYSTEM OF MANAGEMENT 9 2.1 Objectives of Management 9 2.2 Management Strategies 9 2.3 Management Responsibility 11 2.4 Monitoring, Reporting and Review 11 3. LIST OF APPENDICES 11 Appendix 1 Map 1 Locality Appendix 1 Map 2 Cadastral Boundaries, Forest Types and Streams Appendix 1 Map 3 Vegetation Growth Stages Appendix 1 Map 4 Existing Occupation Permits and Recreation Facilities Appendix 2 Flora Species known to occur in the Reserve Appendix 3 Fauna records within the Reserve Y:\Tourism and Partnerships\Recreation Areas\Orara East SF\Bruxner Flora Reserve\FlRWP_Bruxner.docx 1 Bruxner Park Flora Reserve Working Plan 1. Details of the Reserve 1.1 Introduction This plan has been prepared as a supplementary plan under the Nature Conservation Strategy of the Upper North East Ecologically Sustainable Forest Management (ESFM) Plan. It is prepared in accordance with the terms of section 25A (5) of the Forestry Act 1916 with the objective to provide for the future management of that part of Orara East State Forest No 536 set aside as Bruxner Park Flora Reserve No 3. The plan was approved by the Minister for Forests on 16.5.2011 and will be reviewed in 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Environment and Communications Legislation Committee Answers to Questions on Notice Environment Portfolio
    Senate Standing Committee on Environment and Communications Legislation Committee Answers to questions on notice Environment portfolio Question No: 3 Hearing: Additional Estimates Outcome: Outcome 1 Programme: Biodiversity Conservation Division (BCD) Topic: Threatened Species Commissioner Hansard Page: N/A Question Date: 24 February 2016 Question Type: Written Senator Waters asked: The department has noted that more than $131 million has been committed to projects in support of threatened species – identifying 273 Green Army Projects, 88 20 Million Trees projects, 92 Landcare Grants (http://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/resources/3be28db4-0b66-4aef-9991- 2a2f83d4ab22/files/tsc-report-dec2015.pdf) 1. Can the department provide an itemised list of these projects, including title, location, description and amount funded? Answer: Please refer to below table for itemised lists of projects addressing threatened species outcomes, including title, location, description and amount funded. INFORMATION ON PROJECTS WITH THREATENED SPECIES OUTCOMES The following projects were identified by the funding applicant as having threatened species outcomes and were assessed against the criteria for the respective programme round. Funding is for a broad range of activities, not only threatened species conservation activities. Figures provided for the Green Army are approximate and are calculated on the 2015-16 indexed figure of $176,732. Some of the funding is provided in partnership with State & Territory Governments. Additional projects may be approved under the Natinoal Environmental Science programme and the Nest to Ocean turtle Protection Programme up to the value of the programme allocation These project lists reflect projects and funding originally approved. Not all projects will proceed to completion.
    [Show full text]
  • Richmond Birdwing Conservation Network Newsletter
    Richmond Birdwing Conservation Network Newsletter No 21, June 2011 RICHMOND BIRDWING CONSERVATION NETWORK The Richmond Birdwing Conservation Network (RBCN) is a community- based Group, under the umbrella of the Wildlife Preservation Society of Queensland (WPSQ). RBCN promotes conservation of the Richmond birdwing butterfly Ornithoptera richmondia , its food plants, Pararistolochia spp. and habitats for the butterfly. Subscription to the Network is open to anyone interested in the Richmond birdwing or other insects of conservation concern. RBCN encourages liaison between community members, Catchment and Landcare groups, and relevant local and state government authorities. RBCN hosts General Meetings, Workshops and Field Days. This Newsletter is published by the Wildlife Preservation Society of Queensland. The RBCN Network Committee thanks Lois Hughes for permission to reproduce the delightful illustrations on covers of this series. RBCN OFFICE BEARERS Network Committee Chairman (Acting ) Retiring Chair (2010-11) Hugh Krenske (National Data Base) Greg Siepen (Projects/Grants) [email protected] [email protected] Ray Seddon (Corridor Convenor) Joan Heavey [email protected] [email protected] Chris Hosking (Assist. Editor) Susan Rielly [email protected] [email protected] Dr Ian Gynther (DERM collaboration) Don Sands (Newsletter Editor) [email protected] [email protected] www.richmondbirdwing.org.au Subscriptions ($15 per annum payable to RBCN-WPSQ) and all correspondence to be sent to: The
    [Show full text]
  • QFC Fauna Report
    Fauna Habitat Assessment and EVR Investigations Proposed Alignment for Northern Pipeline Interconnector Stage 2 Palmwoods to Yandina Report Prepared for Southern Regional Water Pipeline Alliance Fauna Habitat Assessment and EVR Species Investigations Proposed Alignment for Northern Pipeline Interconnector Stage 2 Palmwoods to Yandina 21/03/2008 Date 21/03/08 Title Fauna Habitat Assessment and EVR Investigation. Proposed Alignment for Northern Pipeline Interconnector Stage 2 Palmwoods to Yandina. Author/s Bryan Robinson Status Final Report Filed as Northern Pipeline Interconnector EVR Fauna and Habitat Assessment Stage 2 Report 0801 The contents of this report and its appendices may not be used in any form by any party other than the Client. The reproduction, adaptation, use or communication of the information contained within this report may not be used without the written permission of Queensland Fauna Consultancy Pty Ltd. Neither the author/s nor the company (QFC Pty Ltd) accepts any liability or responsibility for the unauthorised use of any part of this document. Queensland Fauna Consultancy Pty Ltd. Page ii Report number 0801 Final Report Fauna Habitat Assessment and EVR Species Investigations Proposed Alignment for Northern Pipeline Interconnector Stage 2 Palmwoods to Yandina 21/03/2008 CONTENTS CONTENTS ................................................................................................................ 1 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................. 3
    [Show full text]
  • Richmond Birdwing Recovery Network Inc
    Newsletter of the Richmond Birdwing Recovery Network Inc. Number 8, April 2007 $4.00 ISSN 1833-86 Richmond Birdwing Recovery Network Newsletter No. 8 April 2007 1 Our cover illustration of a female Richmond birdwing feeding on bottlebrush nectar is from an original painting by Lois Hughes. Prints beautifully reproduced on quality watercolour paper (295 x 210 cm) are available from Lois Hughes (ph. (07) 3206 6229) for $20 per print + postage. The RICHMOND BIRDWING RECOVERY NETWORK INC. since it was launched in 2005, has promoted conservation of the Richmond birdwing butterfly Ornithoptera richmondia , its habitats and food plants. Membership of the Network is open to anyone interested in conserving the Richmond birdwing and other insects of conservation concern. The Network promotes liaison between interested community members, catchment groups and relevant local and state government authorities. The Network holds quarterly General Meetings, occasional Regional or Special Meetings and publishes quarterly, a Newsletter distributed to the members. OFFICE BEARERS 2006/07 President Secretary Don Sands, Dawn Muir c/- RBRN, PO Box 855, c/- RBRN, PO Box 855, Kenmore, Qld 4069 Kenmore, Qld 4069 [email protected] [email protected] Vice President Treasurer Greg Siepen Alan Scott c/- RBRN, PO Box 855, c/- RBRN, PO Box 855, Kenmore, Qld 4069 Kenmore, Qld 4069 [email protected] Councillors Chris Hosking Jan Crossland c/- RBRN, PO Box 855, c/- RBRN, PO Box 855, Kenmore, Qld 4069 Kenmore, Qld 4069 [email protected] [email protected] Hugh Krenske c/- RBRN, PO Box 855, Kenmore, Qld 4069 [email protected] This newsletter is distributed to members of the Richmond Birding Recovery Network Inc .
    [Show full text]
  • Project Report
    Project Report Host vines for use in the captive breeding and release program to overcome inbreeding depression in wild populations of the Richmond birdwing butterfly Ornithoptera richmondia Matt Cecil* On behalf of the Richmond Birdwing Conservation Network 16 October 2019 *Wildlife Preservation Society of Queensland, Level 1, 30 Gladstone Road, Highgate Hill Queensland 4101, Australia. Introduction The Richmond birdwing butterfly Ornithoptera richmondia, the largest butterfly in subtropical eastern Australia, is restricted to south-east Queensland and north-east New South Wales, where it favours lowland rainforest supporting the sole, low-elevation larval food plant, the birdwing butterfly vine Pararistolochia praevenosa. In Queensland, the Richmond birdwing is listed as vulnerable under the Nature Conservation Act 1992, although it is not listed under equivalent conservation legislation in New South Wales. Loss and fragmentation of habitat in the region since European settlement has resulted in a reduction in the butterfly’s range of approximately 60%. More insidiously, forest fragmentation has isolated certain birdwing subpopulations, which over time have become inbred. This has resulted in localised extinction events, causing a further contraction in the butterfly’s distribution. In an attempt to counteract these threats to the species, a captive-breeding and release program is being conducted by the Department of Environment and Science (DES) in Queensland, with the support of the Richmond Birdwing Conservation Network (RBCN) and other collaborators. The program, which commenced in 2010, entails selectively mating adult butterflies from different geographic sources to yield progeny with increased genetic diversity for release to the wild at target localities in south-east Queensland where inbreeding is known or suspected to be exerting a negative impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Interactions Among Leaf Miners, Host Plants and Parasitoids in Australian Subtropical Rainforest
    Food Webs along Elevational Gradients: Interactions among Leaf Miners, Host Plants and Parasitoids in Australian Subtropical Rainforest Author Maunsell, Sarah Published 2014 Thesis Type Thesis (PhD Doctorate) School Griffith School of Environment DOI https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/3017 Copyright Statement The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/368145 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au Food webs along elevational gradients: interactions among leaf miners, host plants and parasitoids in Australian subtropical rainforest Sarah Maunsell BSc (Hons) Griffith School of Environment Science, Environment, Engineering and Technology Griffith University Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy February 2014 Synopsis Gradients in elevation are used to understand how species respond to changes in local climatic conditions and are therefore a powerful tool for predicting how mountain ecosystems may respond to climate change. While many studies have shown elevational patterns in species richness and species turnover, little is known about how multi- species interactions respond to elevation. An understanding of how species interactions are affected by current clines in climate is imperative if we are to make predictions about how ecosystem function and stability will be affected by climate change. This challenge has been addressed here by focussing on a set of intimately interacting species: leaf-mining insects, their host plants and their parasitoid predators. Herbivorous insects, including leaf miners, and their host plants and parasitoids interact in diverse and complex ways, but relatively little is known about how the nature and strengths of these interactions change along climatic gradients.
    [Show full text]
  • Aristolochia Acuminata and the Richmond Birdwing - Garry Sankowsky
    Aristolochia acuminata and the Richmond Birdwing - Garry Sankowsky For ten years I lived on Mt Tamborine where my wife and I operated the Tamborine Mountain Butterfly Farm. Mt Tamborine is prime Richmond Birdwing country and we had the Birdwings breeding in our garden all the time as well as breeding large numbers for the flight cage and sale of specimens and pupae. There has been a lot of hype going around claiming that Aristolochia acuminata (Tagala Pipevine) is not suitable for this species. In all this time I rarely used Pararistolochia praevenosa for one simple reason – it is far too slow growing and takes years to develop into a large vine. I can only imagine that the huge vines that are growing on the mountain are many hundreds of years old. The species I mainly used were A. acuminata and an Aristolochia species from Rabaul that has huge soft leaves, as big as a dinner plate. It is the host plant of Ornithoptera urvillianus. I also used A. indica which has naturalised near Darwin. The problem with the soft leaved species of Aristolochia is the situation in which they are grown. When Birdwing eggs are laid on the younger leaves (and this includes Cairns as well as Richmond Birdwings) the leaf reacts to the glue that holds the egg in place which causes it to weep juices onto the egg. These juices then often go mouldy and the resulting mould kills the egg. This is simply the plant fighting back. Because of this Birdwings have evolved the habit of mostly not laying their eggs directly on the host plant but on the leaves of the plant over which the Aristolochia is growing.
    [Show full text]
  • I Is the Sunda-Sahul Floristic Exchange Ongoing?
    Is the Sunda-Sahul floristic exchange ongoing? A study of distributions, functional traits, climate and landscape genomics to investigate the invasion in Australian rainforests By Jia-Yee Samantha Yap Bachelor of Biotechnology Hons. A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2018 Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation i Abstract Australian rainforests are of mixed biogeographical histories, resulting from the collision between Sahul (Australia) and Sunda shelves that led to extensive immigration of rainforest lineages with Sunda ancestry to Australia. Although comprehensive fossil records and molecular phylogenies distinguish between the Sunda and Sahul floristic elements, species distributions, functional traits or landscape dynamics have not been used to distinguish between the two elements in the Australian rainforest flora. The overall aim of this study was to investigate both Sunda and Sahul components in the Australian rainforest flora by (1) exploring their continental-wide distributional patterns and observing how functional characteristics and environmental preferences determine these patterns, (2) investigating continental-wide genomic diversities and distances of multiple species and measuring local species accumulation rates across multiple sites to observe whether past biotic exchange left detectable and consistent patterns in the rainforest flora, (3) coupling genomic data and species distribution models of lineages of known Sunda and Sahul ancestry to examine landscape-level dynamics and habitat preferences to relate to the impact of historical processes. First, the continental distributions of rainforest woody representatives that could be ascribed to Sahul (795 species) and Sunda origins (604 species) and their dispersal and persistence characteristics and key functional characteristics (leaf size, fruit size, wood density and maximum height at maturity) of were compared.
    [Show full text]