DOCSLIB.ORG

Successively Bishop of London and Archbishop of York and Canterbury

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Successively Bishop of London and Archbishop of York and Canterbury THE REMAINS OP ARCHBISHOP GRINDAL. mt $a*fcet Society Snatitutrtu a. 33. Hi. 19 <£<£©. Sit. dFor tf)e $uWtcatton of tfje SHorfee of tfje ^atfiera antr CSatlt? ffiBritere of tfje mcformea THE REMAINS EDMUND GRINDAL, D-D. SUCCESSIVELY BISHOP OF LONDON, AND ARCHBISHOP OF YORK AND CANTERBURY. EDITED FOR CTe liarfcet Society, BY THE REV. WILLIAM NICHOLSON, A.M. RECTOR OF ST MAURICE WITH ST MARY KALENDAR, WINCHESTER. CAMBRIDGE: PRINTED AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS. M.DCCCXLIII. CONTENTS. PAGE I. Biographical Notice vii II. Sermon at the Funeral Solemnity of the Emperor Fer- dinand 1 III. Dialogue between Custom and Verity 35 IV- Occasional Services for the Plague 75 1. Form of Prayer and Public Fast 84 2. Homily concerning the Justice of God 95 3. Thanksgiving for the Abatement of the Plague Ill 4. Thanksgiving for the Cessation of the Plague 115 V. Injunctions and Articles of Inquiry. i. For the Province of York: 1. Injunctions for the Clergy 122 2. Injunctions for the Laity 132 3. Injunctions to the Dean and Chapter of York 145 4. Order for the removal of Rood-lofts 154 ii. For the Province of Canterbury : 1. General Articles of Inquiry for the Metropolitical Visitation 156 2. Articles of Inquiry for Cathedral Churches 178 3. Injunctions to the Dean and Chapter of Bangor 183 4. Articles agreed upon in the Synod of 1575-6 185 5. Mandate for the publication of the above Articles 191 VI. Disputation at Cambridge a.d. 1549 193 VII. Examination of certain Londoners before the Ecclesiastical Commissioners, a.d. 1567 199 VIII. Letters of Archbishop Grindal 217 To John Foxe, 219—237. To Bishop Ridley, 238. To his Archdeacons, 240, 246, 415. To the Suffragan Bishops, 241. Miscellaneous, 242, 261, 286, 293, 362. To Sir William Cecil (Lord Burleigh), 244, 253—261, 264-266, 267—275, 280—285, 287—290, 291—292, 295—298, 299—315, 320—326, 329—333, 342—346, 348—352, 355—361, 363, 365, 391, 397—400, 401—403. CONTENTS. PAGE To the Magistrates of Frankfort, 247. To Archbishop Parker, 252, 267, 290, 294, 299, 326, 347, 353. To the Lord Robert Dudley, (Earl of Leicester) 261. To Hierome Zanchius, 276—280, 333—342. To the Privy Council, 316—320, 392, 396. To his Officers, 361, 408—414, 417—420, 423—429. To Queen Elizabeth, 364, 376. Letters and Documents relating to the Archbishop's Sequestration, 372—403. To Bishop Whitgift, 370. To Dr Matthew Hutton, Dean of York, 394—396. To the Bishop of London, 404—408, 421. To the Bishops, 429. IX. Miscellaneous Pieces: 1. Animadversions on Justus Velsiu9' Norma, Latin and English 436 2. Form of Revocation offered to Hadrian Hamsted, Latin and English 441 3. Account of the Archbishop's Court of Faculties 446 4. Opinions and Directions concerning Ecclesiastical Discipline 451 X. The Archbishop's Last Will and Testament 458 XI. Appendix 465 1. The Queen's Letter to the Bishops 467 2. Lord Burleigh's Message to the Archbishop 469 3. Speech to the Archbishop in Council 471 4. Christiani Hominis Norma, auctore Justo Velsio 474 5. A Form of Meditation 477 XII. Index 485 BIOGRAPHICAL NO.TICB OF ARCHBISHOP GRINDAL. Edmund Gkindal was born in the year 1519, in the parish of St Bees in Cumberland. Of his family and early history little is known. One remarkable incident, however, is on record connected with his boyhood, which shews his diligence in learning. His book was the companion of his walks, and thereby on one occasion became the preserver of his life. While he was walking in the fields, an arrow lighted upon his breast, and, had not the book intercepted it, would 1 probably have been fatal . He was the intimate friend and companion of Edwin Sandys, who was a native of the same place, and who after- wards succeeded him in the sees of London and York. At the usual age he was sent to Magdalen College, Cambridge, whence he afterwards removed successively to Christ's College and Pembroke Hall. Of this last-named society he became fellow, president, and master. He seems to have taken the degree of B.A. about a.d. 1538, in which year he was ad- mitted to a fellowship ; upon which, as a title, he was ordained, July 4, 1544, by John Bird, bishop of Winchester. In 1541 he proceeded to M.A., and in the year 1548, served the office of senior proctor. His academical career gave promise of future eminence. " Before he came to be taken notice of in the church (ob- 1 Saepenumero mihi in mentem venit, honoratissime Antistes, illius sagittae, quae de coelo delapsa, ruri cum puer ambulares, pectus tuum ita feriit, ut nisi liber, quern pro praecordiis turn forte gerebas, vim teli intercepisset, actum fuisset de vita tua. Conrad. Hubert. Epist. dedica- toria in Buceri Scripta Anglicana. 11 BIOGRAPHICAL NOTICE serves Strype), he made a figure in the university, as one of the ripest wits and learnedest men in Cambridge 1 " In proof of which we find him, in June, a.d. 1549, selected out of the whole university, as one of the four disputants against the doctrine of transubstantiation, at a public disputation held 2 before king Edward's visitors . In the same year he was appointed Lady Margaret's preacher, and also president, or vice-master, of his college. In the following year, 1550, bishop Ridley appointed him one of his chaplains, together with Bradford and Rogers, both afterwards martyrs in queen Mary's reign. It is not improbable that Ridley, besides knowing Grindal as a member of his college, had also been impressed with a favourable opinion of his learning and abilities during the recent disputation at which he had presided. The high estimation in which the bishop held him is apparent in the following extract from a letter 3 " which he wrote to Sir John Cheke : Now the man master Grindal, unto whom I would give this prebend [that of Cantrells or Kentish Town], doth move me much ; for he is a man known to be both of virtue, honesty, discretion, wisdom, and learning." Shortly after this, August 24, 1551, he was preferred to the office of precentor of St Paul's. While thus connected with bishop Ridley, he was con- stantly employed in preaching throughout the diocese; a satis- factory evidence of the reputation in which he was held, when the choicest men were selected for the pulpits, in order to impress the popular mind in favour of the reformed religion. In the same year we find him engaged in two private conferences on the eucharistic controversy ; the question being the true meaning of the words, " This is my body," whether to be understood figuratively or literally. The disputants were, on the protestant side, Grindal, Horn, Cheke, and Whitehead; and on the other, Fecknam, Young, and Watson. In De- cember of this same year he was appointed chaplain to king 1 2 Grind, p. 6. See p. 194. 3 See bishop Ridley's Works, Parker Soc. p. 331. OP ARCHBISHOP GRINDAL. HI Edward, with a salary of £40.; and in July 1552, he ob- tained a prebend in Westminster. In the month of November a project was under con- sideration for dividing the diocese of Durham, then vacant by 4 the deprivation of bishop Tonstall ; and it seems that Grindal was nominated for one of these bishoprics. Newcastle-upon- Tyne was to have been the newly-erected see ; but the design was frustrated through some influence at court. On July 6, 1553, king Edward died, and with him the hopes of those who looked favourably upon the advancing work of the Reformation. Foreseeing the storm which was gathering over the church, Grindal, in company with many others of great piety and learning, of whom several afterwards attained to places of eminence under queen Elizabeth, took refuge on the continent. His first place of exile was Stras- burgh ; and so little hope did he entertain of a change in the aspect of ecclesiastical affairs in England, that he applied himself diligently to learn the German language, that he might be able to exercise his ministry in those parts 6 From Stras- burgh he occasionally visited other places, and spent some time at Wasselheim, Spires, and Frankfort. One of GrindaFs chief employments during his exile was to collect " the writings and stories of the learned and pious sufferers in England, and to publish them ; for which purpose 11 he had a great correspondence here. The results of his in- quiries he communicated to John Foxe, who incorporated them into his laborious work, the " Acts and Monuments." How much Foxe was indebted to Grindal, will appear from the correspondence given in this volume, to which the reader is referred, (pp. 219—238.) The unhappy dissensions amongst the English exiles at Frankfort, in 1554, are too well known to require explanation 4 See bishop Burnet's account of this matter, ii. 442, Oxford, 1829. 5 Desperans de patriae salute, Wasselheimii linguse Germanicee operam dederis, quod earn ita adeptus sis, ut vox tua etiam in Ger- manicis ecclesiis audiri potuisset. Conrad. Hubert. Epist. Dedic. in Buceri Script. Anglic. a2 : IV BIOGRAPHICAL NOTICE here. It is sufficient to observe that there were two parties, one desirous of maintaining the exclusive use, in public wor- ship, of king Edward's second book ; the other, headed by Knox and Whittingham, endeavouring to approximate the services to those then in use at Geneva. These dissen- sions and heart-burnings were matters of deep concern to the brethren at Strasburgh and elsewhere, who saw in them, not only a scandal to the reformed English church, but the elements of danger to the cause of the Eeformation in general.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Works of Augustus Toplady
    THE WORKS OF AUGUSTUS TOPLADY VOLUME 2 THE WORKS OF AUGUSTUS M. TOPLADY, A.B. LATE VICAR OF BROAD HEMBURY, DEVON. _____________________________________ NEW EDITION, WITH AN ENLARGED MEMOIR OF THE AUTHOR _____________________________________ IN SIX VOLUMES ____________ VOL. 2 ____________ LONDON: PRINTED FOR WILLIAM BAYNES AND SON, PATERNOSTER ROW; AND H. S. BAYNES, EDINBURGH ___________ 1825 As Published By Grace-eBooks.com 2015 Book II - Works of Augustus Toplady Calvinism XVI - The Judgment of the most eminent English Martyrs,... SECTION XVI. The Judgment of the most eminent English Martyrs, and Confesssors, who suffered Death, or Persecution, after the Overthrow of the Reformation by Queen Mary I. WE have seen in the three preceeding Sections, 1. That the reformers of the Church of England were zealous Calvinists, as to matters of doctrine: 2. That Calvin himself had a very considerable hand in reducing our liturgy to that purity and excellence which it still retains: and, 3. That Calvin, Beza, Zanchius, Sadeel, Bullinger, and Gualter, entertained very respectful and affectionate sentiments, concerning the ritual, decency and order, together with the episcopal regimen, of our incomparable Church. And, to the approbation of those most learned persons, might be added (if need required) that of many other foreign Calvinists, who are deservedly numbered among the first ornaments of that century. While pious king Edward lived, the Church of England saw herself at the very pinnacle of spiritual prosperity. Her supreme visible head was a prodigy of wisdom, knowledge, and undefiled religion. Her bishops were luminaries of the first brightness: men glowing with love to God; clear in the doctrines of the gospel, and zealous in maintaining them; of eminent learning, for the most part; assertors, and patterns, of every good word and work.
    [Show full text]
  • The Holinshed Editors: Religious Attitudes and Their Consequences
    The Holinshed editors: religious attitudes and their consequences By Felicity Heal Jesus College, Oxford This is an introductory lecture prepared for the Cambridge Chronicles conference, July 2008. It should not be quoted or cited without full acknowledgement. Francis Thynne, defending himself when writing lives of the archbishops of Canterbury, one of sections of the 1587 edition of Holinshed that was censored, commented : It is beside my purpose, to treat of the substance of religion, sith I am onelie politicall and not ecclesiasticall a naked writer of histories, and not a learned divine to treat of mysteries of religion.1 And, given the sensitivity of any expression of religious view in mid-Elizabethan England, he and his fellow-contributors were wise to fall back, on occasions, upon the established convention that ecclesiastical and secular histories were in two separate spheres. It is true that the Chronicles can appear overwhelmingly secular, dominated as they are by scenes of war and political conflict. But of course Thynne did protest too much. No serious chronicler could avoid giving the history of the three kingdoms an ecclesiastical dimension: the mere choice of material proclaimed religious identity and, among their other sources, the editors drew extensively upon a text that did irrefutably address the ‘mysteries of religion’ – Foxe’s Book of Martyrs.2 Moreover, in a text as sententious as Holinshed the reader is constantly led in certain interpretative directions. Those directions are superficially obvious – the affirmation 1 Citations are to Holinshed’s Chronicles , ed. Henry Ellis, 6 vols. (London, 1807-8): 4:743 2 D.R.Woolf, The Idea of History in Early Stuart England (Toronto, 1990), ch 1 1 of the Protestant settlement, anti-Romanism and a general conviction about the providential purposes of the Deity for Englishmen.
    [Show full text]
  • Lambeth Palace Library Research Guide Biographical Sources for Archbishops of Canterbury from 1052 to the Present Day
    Lambeth Palace Library Research Guide Biographical Sources for Archbishops of Canterbury from 1052 to the Present Day 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 3 2 Abbreviations Used ....................................................................................................... 4 3 Archbishops of Canterbury 1052- .................................................................................. 5 Stigand (1052-70) .............................................................................................................. 5 Lanfranc (1070-89) ............................................................................................................ 5 Anselm (1093-1109) .......................................................................................................... 5 Ralph d’Escures (1114-22) ................................................................................................ 5 William de Corbeil (1123-36) ............................................................................................. 5 Theobold of Bec (1139-61) ................................................................................................ 5 Thomas Becket (1162-70) ................................................................................................. 6 Richard of Dover (1174-84) ............................................................................................... 6 Baldwin (1184-90) ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Apostolic Succession of the Right Rev. James Michael St. George
    The Apostolic Succession of The Right Rev. James Michael St. George © Copyright 2014-2015, The International Old Catholic Churches, Inc. 1 Table of Contents Certificates ....................................................................................................................................................4 ......................................................................................................................................................................5 Photos ...........................................................................................................................................................6 Lines of Succession........................................................................................................................................7 Succession from the Chaldean Catholic Church .......................................................................................7 Succession from the Syrian-Orthodox Patriarchate of Antioch..............................................................10 The Coptic Orthodox Succession ............................................................................................................16 Succession from the Russian Orthodox Church......................................................................................20 Succession from the Melkite-Greek Patriarchate of Antioch and all East..............................................27 Duarte Costa Succession – Roman Catholic Succession .........................................................................34
    [Show full text]
  • Antonio Magliabechi E Le Sue Note All'«Index Librorum Prohibitorum»1
    Alfonso Mirto Antonio Magliabechi e le sue note all’«Index Librorum Prohibitorum»1 1. Gli indici dei libri proibiti Paolo III Farnese2, con la bolla Licet ab initio del 21 luglio 1542, creava la Congregazione dell’Inquisizione, conferendo a sei cardinali poteri straordi- nari3. Tra i compiti da espletare vi era quello di stabilire quali libri erano da ritenersi leciti e quali quelli da proibire; dopo varie vicissitudini e dopo che in tanti luoghi erano stati predisposti elenchi di titoli da vietare, nel 1559 fu stampato il primo indice romano4, voluto da Paolo IV Carafa5. Questi era stato per anni inquisitore generale e ciò spiega il motivo che l’indice in questione fu più severo e l’unico stilato dall’Inquisizione romana. La sua struttura rima- se, nelle linee generali, immutata per oltre un secolo: i libri furono ordinati alfabeticamente e ripartiti in tre gruppi. Nel primo erano inseriti i testi degli autori non cattolici di cui si proibiva l’intera opera; seguiva un secondo gruppo di autori dei quali si proibiva solo una singola opera e, infine, i titoli anonimi. La rigidità di quest’Indice provocò molte rimostranze e il nuovo papa Pio IV Medici6, più moderato, incaricò alcuni vescovi, riuniti a Trento per la fase fi- nale del Concilio, di preparare un nuovo elenco che sostituisse quello paolino. L’Indice, chiamato tridentino, fu promulgato nel 1564 e, pur non mutando nella sostanza, cambiò nello spirito e nelle norme generali. L’Indice tridenti- no, proprio perché non compilato dagli inquisitori, non incontrò le difficoltà del precedente per essere accettato almeno negli Stati italiani.
    [Show full text]
  • Archbishop of Canterbury, and One of the Things This Meant Was That Fruit Orchards Would Be Established for the Monasteries
    THE ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY And yet — in fact you need only draw a single thread at any point you choose out of the fabric of life and the run will make a pathway across the whole, and down that wider pathway each of the other threads will become successively visible, one by one. — Heimito von Doderer, DIE DÂIMONEN “NARRATIVE HISTORY” AMOUNTS TO FABULATION, THE REAL STUFF BEING MERE CHRONOLOGY “Stack of the Artist of Kouroo” Project Archbishops of Canterb HDT WHAT? INDEX ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY 597 CE Christianity was established among the Anglo-Saxons in Kent by Augustine (this Roman import to England was of course not the Aurelius Augustinus of Hippo in Africa who had been in the ground already for some seven generations — and therefore he is referred to sometimes as “St. Augustine the Less”), who in this year became the 1st Archbishop of Canterbury, and one of the things this meant was that fruit orchards would be established for the monasteries. Despite repeated Viking attacks many of these survived. The monastery at Ely (Cambridgeshire) would be particularly famous for its orchards and vineyards. DO I HAVE YOUR ATTENTION? GOOD. Archbishops of Canterbury “Stack of the Artist of Kouroo” Project HDT WHAT? INDEX ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY 604 CE May 26, 604: Augustine died (this Roman import to England was of course not the Aurelius Augustinus of Hippo in Africa who had been in the ground already for some seven generations — and therefore he is referred to sometimes as “St. Augustine the Less”), and Laurentius succeeded him as Archbishop of Canterbury.
    [Show full text]
  • Lambeth Palace Library Research Guide Archbishops of Canterbury – Universities Attended Abbreviations: B
    Lambeth Palace Library Research Guide Archbishops of Canterbury – Universities attended abbreviations: b. = born. c or c. = circa. e = education. e. = educated. esp. = especially. nr. = near. s = school. (ap) = apparently. (pr) = probably. (ps) = possibly. (r) = reputedly. 105th 2013- Justin Portal Welby (b. 1956) Trinity College Cambridge BA 78; St John’s College Durham BA 91. 104th 2002-2012 Rowan Douglas Williams (b. 1950) Christ’s College Cambridge BA 71, MA 75; Wadham College, Oxford DPhil 75; DD 89. 103rd 1991-2002 George Leonard Carey (b.1935) London College of Divinity. King's College London. Associate of the London College of Divinity 1st class 1961, BD Hons 1962 (London), MTh1965 (London), PhD1971 (London). 102nd 1980-1991 Robert Alexander Kennedy Runcie (1921-2000) Brasenose College Oxford (1 year). Sandhurst (trained for Guards Armoured Division). Brasenose College Oxford. BA (1st class lit. hum) 1948, MA 1948. 101st 1974-1980 Frederick Donald Coggan (1909-2000) St John's College Cambridge. 1st class oriental languages tripos part i 1930, BA (1st class oriental languages tripos part ii), MA 1935. 100th 1961-1974 Arthur Michael Ramsey (1904-1988) Magdalene College Cambridge. 2nd class classical tripos part i 1925, BA (1st class theological tripos part i) 1927, MA1930, BD1950. 99th 1945-1961 Geoffrey Francis Fisher (1887-1972) Exeter College Oxford. 1st class classical honour moderations 1908, BA (1st class literae humaniores) 1910, 1st class theology 1911, MA1913. 98th 1942-1944 William Temple (1881-1944) Balliol College Oxford. 1st class honour moderations 1902 & literae humaniores 1904. 97th 1928-1941 William Cosmo Gordon Lang (1864-1945) Glasgow. MA. Balliol College Oxford.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Calvinism: B
    Introduction A. Special Terminology I. The Persons Understanding Calvinism: B. Distinctive Traits A. John Calvin 1. Governance Formative Years in France: 1509-1533 An Overview Study 2. Doctrine Ministry Years in Switzerland: 1533-1564 by 3. Worship and Sacraments Calvin’s Legacy III. Psycology and Sociology of the Movement Lorin L Cranford IV. Biblical Assessment B. Influencial Interpreters of Calvin Publication of C&L Publications. II. The Ideology All rights reserved. © Conclusion INTRODUCTION1 Understanding the movement and the ideology la- belled Calvinism is a rather challenging topic. But none- theless it is an important topic to tackle. As important as any part of such an endeavour is deciding on a “plan of attack” in getting into the topic. The movement covered by this label “Calvinism” has spread out its tentacles all over the place and in many different, sometimes in conflicting directions. The logical starting place is with the person whose name has been attached to the label, although I’m quite sure he would be most uncomfortable with most of the content bearing his name.2 After exploring the history of John Calvin, we will take a look at a few of the more influential interpreters of Calvin over the subsequent centuries into the present day. This will open the door to attempt to explain the ideology of Calvinism with some of the distinctive terms and concepts associated exclusively with it. I. The Persons From the digging into the history of Calvinism, I have discovered one clear fact: Calvinism is a religious thinking in the 1500s of Switzerland when he lived and movement that goes well beyond John Calvin, in some worked.
    [Show full text]
  • Episcopal Tombs in Early Modern England
    Jnl of Ecclesiastical History, Vol. 55, No. 4, October 2004. f 2004 Cambridge University Press 654 DOI: 10.1017/S0022046904001502 Printed in the United Kingdom Episcopal Tombs in Early Modern England by PETER SHERLOCK The Reformation simultaneously transformed the identity and role of bishops in the Church of England, and the function of monuments to the dead. This article considers the extent to which tombs of sixteenth- and seventeenth-century bishops represented a set of episcopal ideals distinct from those conveyed by the monuments of earlier bishops on the one hand and contemporary laity and clergy on the other. It argues that in death bishops were increasingly undifferentiated from other groups such as the gentry in the dress, posture, location and inscriptions of their monuments. As a result of the inherent tension between tradition and reform which surrounded both bishops and tombs, episcopal monuments were unsuccessful as a means of enhancing the status or preserving the memory and teachings of their subjects in the wake of the Reformation. etween 1400 and 1700, some 466 bishops held office in England and Wales, for anything from a few months to several decades.1 The B majority died peacefully in their beds, some fading into relative obscurity. Others, such as Richard Scrope, Thomas Cranmer and William Laud, were executed for treason or burned for heresy in one reign yet became revered as saints, heroes or martyrs in another. Throughout these three centuries bishops played key roles in the politics of both Church and PRO=Public Record Office; TNA=The National Archives I would like to thank Craig D’Alton, Felicity Heal, Clive Holmes, Ralph Houlbrooke, Judith Maltby, Keith Thomas and the anonymous reader for this JOURNAL for their comments on this article.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Modern Migrations Exiles, Expulsion, and Religious Refugees, 1400‐1700
    Early Modern Migrations Exiles, Expulsion, and Religious Refugees, 1400‐1700 Preliminary Program Thursday 19 April 6:00 – 7:00 Registration and Welcome Reception (Old Victoria College, Foyer) 7:00 – 8:00 Concert (Old Victoria College, Alumni Hall) A Kingly Entertainment in a Forraine Climate: Music for Voice, Violin Band and Lute by John Dowland, Thomas Simpson and Members of Elizabeth I's Dance Band. Musicians in Ordinary perform music by and from the repertoire of musical exiles and migrants to and from England Friday 20 April 8:00 – 9:00 Continental Breakfast (Old Victoria College, Foyer) 9:00 – 9:30 Welcome (Old Victoria College, Alumni Hall) 9:30 – 11:00 Session I 1. Strategies of Self‐Identification Chair: Gary Waite (University of New Brunswick) Tomás Mantecón (Universidad de Cantabria) Religious Experiences, Migrations and the Construction of Identities in 17th‐Century Europe Agnieszka Sliwka (University of New Brunswick) Between Displacement and Belonging: “Merry Companies” in Haarlem and Amsterdam c. 1580s‐1620s Kathryn Labelle (Ohio State University) “My Heart is All Huron”: Huron‐Wendat Identity beyond the Dispersal of 1649 2. Bodies in Flux: Blood, Race, Gender Chair: Konrad Eisenbichler (University of Toronto) Cristian Berco (Bishop’s University) Reading the Body: Migrants, Race, and Deviance in Early Modern Spain Fabrizio Titone (Universidad del País Vasco) Politics of Social Control and Exclusion in Late Medieval Sicily Jesse Spohnholz (Washington State University) The Other Face of Religious Refugees: Dutch Women Living in Germany and England, 1550‐1600 1 3. Persecution and Migration Chair: Greta Kroeker (University of Waterloo) Jonathan Ray (Georgetown University) Chaos and Community: The Formation of the Sephardic Diaspora Alessandro Pastore (University of Verona) The Shaping of a Religious Migration: The Refugees from Valtellina after the Sacro Macello of 1620 Berta Cano‐Echevarría and Ana Sáez (Universidad de Valladolid) Educating for Martyrdom: British Exiles in the English College at Valladolid 11:00 – 11:15 Break 11:15 – 1:00 Session II 4.
    [Show full text]
  • 1052 to the Present Day
    Lambeth Palace Library Research Guide Biographical Sources for Archbishops of Canterbury from 1052 to the Present Day 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 3 2 Abbreviations Used ....................................................................................................... 4 3 Archbishops of Canterbury 1052- .................................................................................. 5 Stigand (1052-70) .............................................................................................................. 5 Lanfranc (1070-89) ............................................................................................................ 5 Anselm (1093-1109) .......................................................................................................... 5 Ralph d’Escures (1114-22) ................................................................................................ 5 William de Corbeil (1123-36) ............................................................................................. 5 Theobold of Bec (1139-61) ................................................................................................ 5 Thomas Becket (1162-70) ................................................................................................. 6 Richard of Dover (1174-84) ............................................................................................... 6 Baldwin (1184-90) ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Friends Acquisitions 1964-2018
    Acquired with the Aid of the Friends Manuscripts 1964: Letter from John Dury (1596-1660) to the Evangelical Assembly at Frankfurt-am- Main, 6 August 1633. The letter proposes a general assembly of the evangelical churches. 1966: Two letters from Thomas Arundel, Archbishop of Canterbury, to Nicholas of Lucca, 1413. Letter from Robert Hallum, Bishop of Salisbury concerning Nicholas of Lucca, n.d. 1966: Narrative by Leonardo Frescobaldi of a pilgrimage to the Holy Land in 1384. 1966: Survey of church goods in 33 parishes in the hundreds of Blofield and Walsham, Norfolk, 1549. 1966: Report of a debate in the House of Commons, 27 February 1593. From the Fairhurst Papers. 1967: Petition to the Ecclesiastical Commissioners by Miles Coverdale and others, 1565. From the Fairhurst Papers. 1967: Correspondence and papers of Christopher Wordsworth (1807-1885), Bishop of Lincoln. 1968: Letter from John Whitgift, Archbishop of Canterbury, to John Boys, 1599. 1968: Correspondence and papers of William Howley (1766-1848), Archbishop of Canterbury. 1969: Papers concerning the divorce of Henry VIII and Catherine of Aragon. 1970: Papers of Richard Bertie, Marian exile in Wesel, 1555-56. 1970: Notebook of the Nonjuror John Leake, 1700-35. Including testimony concerning the birth of the Old Pretender. 1971: Papers of Laurence Chaderton (1536?-1640), puritan divine. 1971: Heinrich Bullinger, History of the Reformation. Sixteenth century copy. 1971: Letter from John Davenant, Bishop of Salisbury, to a minister of his diocese [1640]. 1971: Letter from John Dury to Mr. Ball, Preacher of the Gospel, 1639. 1972: ‘The examination of Valentine Symmes and Arthur Tamlin, stationers, … the Xth of December 1589’.
    [Show full text]