On the Organic Law of Change : a Facsimile Edition and Annotated
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
On the Organic Law of Change On the Organic Law of Change A Facsimile Edition and Annotated Transcription of Alfred Russel Wallace’s Species Notebook of 1855–1859 Annotated by James T. Costa Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England 2013 Copyright © 2013 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Book design by Dean Bornstein Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Wallace, Alfred Russel, 1823–1913. On the organic law of change : a facsimile edition and annotated transcrip- tion of Alfred Russel Wallace’s Species notebook of 1855–1859 / Alfred Russel Wallace ; annotated by James T. Costa. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. Summary: Notes from Wallace’s Malay expedition. ISBN 978-0-674-72488-4 (alk. paper) 1. Wallace, Alfred Russel, 1823–1913—Travel—Malay Archipelago. 2. Natural history—Malay Archipelago 3. Natural selection. 4. Evolution (Biology) I. Costa, James T., 1963– II. Title. III. Title: Species notebook of 1855–1859. QH375.W35 2013 508.598—dc23 2013010172 For Leslie, tiger swallowtail mom, with love Contents Preface ix Note on the Text xi Introduction 1 Species Notebook (Recto) 15 Species Notebook (Verso) 393 Appendix 1 535 Species Notebook Entries Bearing on Transmutation and Related Topics Appendix 2 537 On Wallace’s Critique of Charles Lyell and Principles of Geology References 545 Acknowledgments 557 Note on A. R. Wallace Literary Works 559 Index 561 Preface lecting triumphs and failures, and still others with lovely drawings and diagrams—I suddenly wondered, why has this notebook not been published? Biologists, students Alfred Russel Wallace (1823–1913) would have appreciated of evolutionary biology and its history, evolution mavens, the improbable and happenstance manner in which this Wallace and Darwin enthusiasts—all, I knew, would be project got its start: aboard the Oxford tube en route to keenly interested in its contents. London one characteristically wet English morning, I was Concurring with McKinney, I saw that Wallace’s reading a paper by the late historian of science H. Lewis Species Notebook was well named: it is a window into McKinney. Wallace might, in fact, have considered it Wallace’s early evolutionary thinking, encompassing the providential that I happened to be reading McKinney’s period in which his fertile mind was churning out paper account of Wallace’s field notebook dubbed the “Species after insightful paper as he searched for clues to the origin Notebook” not merely en route to London, but in fact on of species. The period of the notebook is, notably, punc- my way to the very locale where, according to the paper, tuated by the publication of two watershed papers in the this wondrous notebook resided: the library and archives history of the field—Wallace’s Sarawak Law paper (1855) of the venerable Linnean Society of London. Andrew and Ternate essay (1858)—among others. In its notes, Berry and I make an annual pilgrimage to the Linnean sketches, and narratives we see Wallace the philosopher with our students in Harvard’s Oxford-based summer and Wallace the collector: the arguments for his planned program on Darwin and evolutionary biology, and we book on transmutation are found side by side with speci- had never realized that most of Wallace’s notebooks and men label designs; his discussions of the nature of species journals from his travels in Southeast Asia sit demurely on and varieties, the meaning of fossils, struggle in nature, or a paneled bookshelf scant meters from the library where the branching history of life all share space with notes on we have the privilege of viewing precious works on natural the cost of rice, lists of books to read, a proposed remedy history. The sedate and stately Linnean is a far cry from the for the proliferation of taxonomic synonyms, and a practi- thatched huts and praus of the Malay Archipelago where cal scheme for a library of natural history. Then there are they were written some 150 years ago, but it is a most fit- the myriad collection notes, from the hunting of orang- ting home considering that Wallace’s notebooks and jour- utans and birds of paradise to his catches of curious beetles nals are now among the crown jewels of biology. and beautiful butterflies. It was, therefore, with much anticipation that we ap- Although historians have long been aware of the proached Lynda Brooks, head librarian of the Linnean, Species Notebook, and some, like McKinney, have studied about seeing the Species Notebook at the end of our pro- it to good effect, beyond a small circle of Wallace scholars gram that day. Lynda kindly proffered it, and as we pored it has been a well-kept secret. Andrew and I wondered: over its pages—some packed with Wallace’s neat script, could we make it more widely available? And perhaps not others with dense tables recording his daily catch and col- merely as a transcription but as an annotated transcription, . ix . to help readers more fully understand and appreciate the In the annotations, I also highlight the many points of remarkable depth and breadth of Wallace’s thinking? That parallel thinking, intersection, and occasional divergence last point is important. Wallace is decidedly underappreci- between Wallace and Darwin during the notebook period ated relative to his illustrious colleague Charles Darwin, and beyond. These should be read as an effort not to mea- all but unknown outside of scholarly circles and even little sure Wallace against Darwin but to show how very reso- known within, and this despite his being not only the co- nant was the thinking of these giants, a point that under- discoverer of one of humanity’s greatest insights into the scores the importance, even justice, of restoring Wallace’s workings of nature—evolution by natural selection—but unwarrantably dimmed star to its former brilliance. The also the founder of the modern discipline of zoogeogra- Species Notebook is an excellent starting point for appre- phy. He made fundamental contributions in evolutionary ciating just how profound Wallace’s insights were in those biology, biogeography, ornithology, and entomology, and years, pre–Origin of Species, when he labored in solitude. weighed in on a host of social issues of his day in a con- We are fortunate indeed that his Species Notebook did tinuous stream of scientific papers, essays, interviews, and not meet the fate of those from his South American jour- books. One does not have to be a conspiracy theorist to ney, lost in the Atlantic as his homebound ship went first appreciate that history, in some respects, has not been just up in flames and then down into the depths. Considering to Wallace. the rigors of Wallace’s peripatetic life in Southeast Asia, That his gifts and contributions are not more widely ap- covering, by his reckoning, some 14,000 miles in eight preciated today is our loss, for Wallace’s story is nothing years of travels, the survival of the notebook is itself cause short of epic, his achievements all the more poignant for for celebration. Through it we hear Wallace’s voice loud their realization against all odds. Wallace’s unique blend and clear from the steamers and praus, huts and houses, of pluck, perseverance, and creativity were combined with jungle trails and trading villages across that infinite archi- the temperament of a philosopher, the sense of wonder of pelago. a child, and more than a dash of genius. This centennial Berlin year marking the naturalist’s death in 1913 offers an oppor- February 10, 2013 tunity for both celebration and reflection on the man and his accomplishments, and there is so much to celebrate and reflect upon. In this regard Wallace’s Species Notebook is an unparalleled lens through which the scope of his early evolutionary thought is seen to advantage, in the context of life in the field where the ideas were conceived. It is in the spirit of enabling the reader to accompany Wallace on his journeys both physical and intellectual that my anno- tations are offered. preface . x Note on the Text Species Notebook Transcription The A. R. Wallace Species Notebook, Linnean Society of Every effort was made to reflect the layout of Wallace’s London manuscript number 180, was used “tête-bêche” original text in the transcription. Transcribed lines that by Wallace, with text running in opposite directions for reasons of space wrap to the next line are indented on inward from each cover, flipped with respect to each the wrapped line. other. These pages are here designated recto (going for- ward from the front of the book to the back) and verso (the reverse, running from back to front). This note- book transcription is based on (but not identical to) the Manuscript Transcription Protocol of the A. R. Wallace Correspondence Project at the Natural History Museum, London (www.nhm.ac.uk/wallacelettersonline). The peciesS Notebook is paginated following Wallace’s page numbers. Prefatory pages and endleaves with entries on them are designated [a], [a-1], [b], [b-1], and so on. The following notations are used in the transcription: Regular square brackets [ ] Enclose editorial insertions, as when completing abbreviated terms: e.g., “coll.” is completed as “coll.[ected]”; “coll.d” as “coll.[ecte]d” (exception: in lists and tables on the verso pages, words are left uncompleted as a space-saving measure) Italic square brackets [ ] Enclose editorial comments, which are themselves italicized [?] Indicates uncertain interpretation of text [illeg.] Indicates text is missing or illegible Struck text Text crossed out in original Super- and subscript insertions in original Shown in superscript or subscript A full stop that appears as a dash in original Transcribed as a period (.) Wallace’s spelling variants (e.g., Aru, Arru) Not corrected .