DOCSLIB.ORG

Fly Times Supplement 2, September 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fly Times Supplement 2, September 2018 FLY TIMES Supplement 2, September, 2018 Stephen D. Gaimari, editor Plant Pest Diagnostics Branch California Department of Food & Agriculture 3294 Meadowview Road Sacramento, California 95832, USA Tel: (916) 262-1131 FAX: (916) 262-1190 Email: [email protected] Welcome to the second Supplement issue of Fly Times! I am very pleased to have started this series, as it will facilitate distribution of larger works such as this one. Please let me encourage you to consider contributing to both the regular Fly Times, and if you are so inclined, to the Fly Times Supplement series. The Fly Times comes out twice a year – April and October (although usually late it seems!), while the Supplement can come out any time. Both this Supplement, and the first one in 2017, are historical in nature, focused on the life and times of dipterists of the past. Future Supplement issues can be historical like this one, or focused on any other dipterological topic, from original research, to travelogues and collecting adventures, to larger taxon-focused themes. The electronic version of the Fly Times continues to be hosted on the North American Dipterists Society website at http://www.nadsdiptera.org/News/FlyTimes/Flyhome.htm, as is the Fly Times Supplement series. Also note, the Directory of North American Dipterists is constantly being updated. Please check your current entry and send all corrections (or new entries) to Jim O’Hara – see the form for this on the last page. Issue No. 61 of the Fly Times will appear very soon, hopefully around the end of next month. Please send your contributions by email to the editor at [email protected]. All contributors for the next Fly Times should aim for mid October 2018 (maybe then I'll get an issue out actually on time!), but as usual, I will send a reminder. And articles after mid October are OK too! Articles for the Fly Times Supplement can be submitted at any time. *************************************** Supplement 2, available online 27 September 2018 CONTENTS Evenhuis, N.L. — The Life and Work of Francis Walker (1809–1874) .................................... 1–101 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 2 2. Background and Early Years ................................................................................................ 3–6 3. Edward Newman, the Entomological Club, and Entomological Colleagues ..................... 7–11 4. Early Publications, Travel, and Family Life ..................................................................... 12–19 5. Cataloguing the British Museum Insect Collections: the Good and the Bad ................... 20–37 Hymenoptera ........................................................................................................................ 32 Diptera ............................................................................................................................ 32–33 Homoptera ............................................................................................................................ 33 Neuroptera ............................................................................................................................ 34 Lepidoptera .................................................................................................................... 34–35 Hemiptera ....................................................................................................................... 35–36 Blattariae .............................................................................................................................. 36 Dermaptera Saltatoria.................................................................................................... 36–37 6. Other Publication Projects ................................................................................................ 38–43 Insecta Britannica .......................................................................................................... 38–40 Insecta Saundersiana...................................................................................................... 40–42 Other Papers .................................................................................................................. 42–43 7. Zoocecida and Plant-Insect Interactions ........................................................................... 44–45 8. The Sale of Specimens to Australia .................................................................................. 46–48 9. Walker and Biogeography ................................................................................................ 49–50 10. Later Years and Trouble with Publishers ....................................................................... 51–52 Unpublished Manuscripts ..................................................................................................... 52 11. Putting Walker’s Taxonomic Ability in Context ............................................................ 53–54 12. Walker and Religion, Cosmology, and Science ............................................................. 55–56 13. Walker’s Collections and Types ..................................................................................... 57–60 14. Postscript: “Something of a Mystic” .................................................................................... 61 15. Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................ 62 16. References ....................................................................................................................... 63–75 Appendix I. Complete bibliography of Francis Walker ..................................................... 76–100 Appendix II. Genealogy of the Walker-Ford Families ............................................................. 101 SUBMISSION FORM, DIRECTORY OF NORTH AMERICAN DIPTERISTS ................................................ 102 *************************************** Fly Times, Supplement 2 1 The Life and Work of Francis Walker (1809–1874) Neal L. Evenhuis J. Linsley Gressitt Center for Entomological Research, Bishop Museum, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, Hawaii 96817, USA; [email protected] 27 September 2018 2 Fly Times, Supplement 2 “If the fame of Mr. Walker as a first-rate entomologist was not already firmly established, this work would secure it for him, replete, as it is, with valuable information, guarded by scientific accuracy.” — Rev. F.O. Morris, 1856, reviewing volume III of Insecta Britannica “But what arrogance to coin original forms, some of which sound like childish babbling and which offer so few clues for the memory that their creator himself must have forgotten them within the next quarter-of-an-hour, and to expect that lepidopterists should sanction such garbage!” — P. Zeller, 1872, translation of a review of Walker’s Lepidoptera works. 1. Introduction The diametrically opposed quotes above typify the irony of comments from colleagues with regard to the writings of British entomologist Francis Walker1. It is odd indeed that someone who was kept in high esteem by one group of entomologists could be at the same time be vilified by others. The Victorian era in Britain saw a dramatic rise in interest in natural history through collecting and/or purchase of specimens and the resultant beginnings of many entomological societies allowing a medium within which its members could gather, socialize, share anecdotes, and exchange observations with like-minded colleagues, as well as examine interesting recently collected specimens. At this same time, the collections of the British Museum were undergoing significant changes, both of size and quality with the construction of additions to and larger buildings at the Bloomsbury facility and the hiring of keepers and assistants for proper curation of its holdings. With continual and significant increases in its holdings of specimens and artifacts through the results of exploratory and scientific voyages and through donations and purchases from private collections, the task of taking inventory of the zoological specimens in the museum via “lists of specimens” and “catalogues2” became a necessary priority. Francis Walker was one the early members of some of those first entomological societies and also one of the major contributors to the enormous task of inventorying and cataloguing the various orders of insects in the British Museum. During his career, my scouring his works page-by-page show that he described 23,626 species as new to science, almost 16,000 of them described during his cataloguing of the British Museum collections. Ohl (2018) calculated that he described about 560 species per year. He was one of the most prolific of describers in the history of entomology if not all of biology. Although his membership in those early societies led the amicable and personable Walker to garner and keep many entomological friends for life, it was the cataloguing and prolific descriptions that was to be his professional nadir and the point of contention by many of his colleagues that much of what he had done was the source of a virtual taxonomic labyrinth that would take generations of entomologists more than a hundred years to navigate. 1 A brief biography of Walker based on this more complete one was published by Evenhuis (2011). 2 Because of the relative proclivity of the use of “catalogue” in this paper and knowing
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ARTHROPOD COMMUNITIES and PASSERINE DIET: EFFECTS of SHRUB EXPANSION in WESTERN ALASKA by Molly Tankersley Mcdermott, B.A./B.S
    Arthropod communities and passerine diet: effects of shrub expansion in Western Alaska Item Type Thesis Authors McDermott, Molly Tankersley Download date 26/09/2021 06:13:39 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/7893 ARTHROPOD COMMUNITIES AND PASSERINE DIET: EFFECTS OF SHRUB EXPANSION IN WESTERN ALASKA By Molly Tankersley McDermott, B.A./B.S. A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Biological Sciences University of Alaska Fairbanks August 2017 APPROVED: Pat Doak, Committee Chair Greg Breed, Committee Member Colleen Handel, Committee Member Christa Mulder, Committee Member Kris Hundertmark, Chair Department o f Biology and Wildlife Paul Layer, Dean College o f Natural Science and Mathematics Michael Castellini, Dean of the Graduate School ABSTRACT Across the Arctic, taller woody shrubs, particularly willow (Salix spp.), birch (Betula spp.), and alder (Alnus spp.), have been expanding rapidly onto tundra. Changes in vegetation structure can alter the physical habitat structure, thermal environment, and food available to arthropods, which play an important role in the structure and functioning of Arctic ecosystems. Not only do they provide key ecosystem services such as pollination and nutrient cycling, they are an essential food source for migratory birds. In this study I examined the relationships between the abundance, diversity, and community composition of arthropods and the height and cover of several shrub species across a tundra-shrub gradient in northwestern Alaska. To characterize nestling diet of common passerines that occupy this gradient, I used next-generation sequencing of fecal matter. Willow cover was strongly and consistently associated with abundance and biomass of arthropods and significant shifts in arthropod community composition and diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Repair and Self-Cleaning of the Lepidopteran Proboscis
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Dissertations Dissertations 8-2019 Self-Repair and Self-Cleaning of the Lepidopteran Proboscis Suellen Floyd Pometto Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations Recommended Citation Pometto, Suellen Floyd, "Self-Repair and Self-Cleaning of the Lepidopteran Proboscis" (2019). All Dissertations. 2452. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations/2452 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SELF-REPAIR AND SELF-CLEANING OF THE LEPIDOPTERAN PROBOSCIS A Dissertation Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy ENTOMOLOGY by Suellen Floyd Pometto August 2019 Accepted by: Dr. Peter H. Adler, Major Advisor and Committee Co-Chair Dr. Eric Benson, Committee Co-Chair Dr. Richard Blob Dr. Patrick Gerard i ABSTRACT The proboscis of butterflies and moths is a key innovation contributing to the high diversity of the order Lepidoptera. In addition to taking nectar from angiosperm sources, many species take up fluids from overripe or sound fruit, plant sap, animal dung, and moist soil. The proboscis is assembled after eclosion of the adult from the pupa by linking together two elongate galeae to form one tube with a single food canal. How do lepidopterans maintain the integrity and function of the proboscis while foraging from various substrates? The research questions included whether lepidopteran species are capable of total self- repair, how widespread the capability of self-repair is within the order, and whether the repaired proboscis is functional.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • Insects of Western North America 4. Survey of Selected Insect Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma 2
    Insects of Western North America 4. Survey of Selected Insect Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma 2. Dragonflies (Odonata), Stoneflies (Plecoptera) and selected Moths (Lepidoptera) Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Survey of Selected Insect Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma 2. Dragonflies (Odonata), Stoneflies (Plecoptera) and selected Moths (Lepidoptera) by Boris C. Kondratieff, Paul A. Opler, Matthew C. Garhart, and Jason P. Schmidt C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 March 15, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration (top to bottom): Widow Skimmer (Libellula luctuosa) [photo ©Robert Behrstock], Stonefly (Perlesta species) [photo © David H. Funk, White- lined Sphinx (Hyles lineata) [photo © Matthew C. Garhart] ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 Copyrighted 2004 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY……………………………………………………………………………….…1 INTRODUCTION…………………………………………..…………………………………………….…3 OBJECTIVE………………………………………………………………………………………….………5 Site Descriptions………………………………………….. METHODS AND MATERIALS…………………………………………………………………………….5 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION………………………………………………………………………..…...11 Dragonflies………………………………………………………………………………….……..11
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of the Species of the Cheilosia Variabilis Group
    Contributions to Zoology, 78 (3) 129-140 (2009) Identification of the species of the Cheilosia variabilis group (Diptera, Syrphidae) from the Balkan Peninsula using wing geometric morphometrics, with the revision of status of C. melanopa redi Vujić, 1996 Lj. Francuski1, A. Vujić1, A. Kovačević1, J. Ludosˇki1 ,V. Milankov1, 2 1 Faculty of Sciences, Department of Biology and Ecology, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 2, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia 2 E-mail: [email protected] Key words: Cheilosia variabilis group, geometric morphometrics, intraspecific divergent units, species delimita- tion, wing shape, wing size Abstract Recognition of phenotypic units .......................................... 134 Phenotypic relationships ....................................................... 136 The present study investigates phenotypic differentiation pat- Discussion ...................................................................................... 137 terns among four species of the Cheilosia variabilis group (Dip- Species delimitation ............................................................... 137 tera, Syrphidae) using a landmark-based geometric morphomet- Intraspecies phenotypic diversity ........................................ 138 ric approach. Herein, wing geometric morphometrics established Phenetic relationships ............................................................ 138 species boundaries that confirm C. melanopa and C. redi stat. Acknowledgements .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • R. P. LANE (Department of Entomology), British Museum (Natural History), London SW7 the Diptera of Lundy Have Been Poorly Studied in the Past
    Swallow 3 Spotted Flytcatcher 28 *Jackdaw I Pied Flycatcher 5 Blue Tit I Dunnock 2 Wren 2 Meadow Pipit 10 Song Thrush 7 Pied Wagtail 4 Redwing 4 Woodchat Shrike 1 Blackbird 60 Red-backed Shrike 1 Stonechat 2 Starling 15 Redstart 7 Greenfinch 5 Black Redstart I Goldfinch 1 Robin I9 Linnet 8 Grasshopper Warbler 2 Chaffinch 47 Reed Warbler 1 House Sparrow 16 Sedge Warbler 14 *Jackdaw is new to the Lundy ringing list. RECOVERIES OF RINGED BIRDS Guillemot GM I9384 ringed 5.6.67 adult found dead Eastbourne 4.12.76. Guillemot GP 95566 ringed 29.6.73 pullus found dead Woolacombe, Devon 8.6.77 Starling XA 92903 ringed 20.8.76 found dead Werl, West Holtun, West Germany 7.10.77 Willow Warbler 836473 ringed 14.4.77 controlled Portland, Dorset 19.8.77 Linnet KC09559 ringed 20.9.76 controlled St Agnes, Scilly 20.4.77 RINGED STRANGERS ON LUNDY Manx Shearwater F.S 92490 ringed 4.9.74 pullus Skokholm, dead Lundy s. Light 13.5.77 Blackbird 3250.062 ringed 8.9.75 FG Eksel, Belgium, dead Lundy 16.1.77 Willow Warbler 993.086 ringed 19.4.76 adult Calf of Man controlled Lundy 6.4.77 THE DIPTERA (TWO-WINGED FLffiS) OF LUNDY ISLAND R. P. LANE (Department of Entomology), British Museum (Natural History), London SW7 The Diptera of Lundy have been poorly studied in the past. Therefore, it is hoped that the production of an annotated checklist, giving an indication of the habits and general distribution of the species recorded will encourage other entomologists to take an interest in the Diptera of Lundy.
    [Show full text]
  • Karl Jordan: a Life in Systematics
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION OF Kristin Renee Johnson for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History of SciencePresented on July 21, 2003. Title: Karl Jordan: A Life in Systematics Abstract approved: Paul Lawrence Farber Karl Jordan (1861-1959) was an extraordinarily productive entomologist who influenced the development of systematics, entomology, and naturalists' theoretical framework as well as their practice. He has been a figure in existing accounts of the naturalist tradition between 1890 and 1940 that have defended the relative contribution of naturalists to the modem evolutionary synthesis. These accounts, while useful, have primarily examined the natural history of the period in view of how it led to developments in the 193 Os and 40s, removing pre-Synthesis naturalists like Jordan from their research programs, institutional contexts, and disciplinary homes, for the sake of synthesis narratives. This dissertation redresses this picture by examining a naturalist, who, although often cited as important in the synthesis, is more accurately viewed as a man working on the problems of an earlier period. This study examines the specific problems that concerned Jordan, as well as the dynamic institutional, international, theoretical and methodological context of entomology and natural history during his lifetime. It focuses upon how the context in which natural history has been done changed greatly during Jordan's life time, and discusses the role of these changes in both placing naturalists on the defensive among an array of new disciplines and attitudes in science, and providing them with new tools and justifications for doing natural history. One of the primary intents of this study is to demonstrate the many different motives and conditions through which naturalists came to and worked in natural history.
    [Show full text]
  • The Blowflies of California
    BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA INSECT SURVEY VOLUME 4,NO. 1 THE BLOWFLIES OF CALIFORNIA (Diptera: Calliphoridae) BY MAURICE T. JAMES (Department of Zo'dlogy, State College of Washington, Pullman) UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY AND LOS ANGELES 1955 BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA INSECT SURVEY Editors: E. G. Linsley, S. B. Freeborn, R. L. Usinger Volume 4, No. 1, pp. 1-34, plates 1-2, 1 figure in text Submitted by Editors, January 13, 1955 Issued October 28, 1955 Price, 50 cents UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY AND LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS LONDON. ENGLAND PRINTED BY OFFSET IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA THE BLOWFLIES OF CALIFORNIA (Diptera: Calliphoridae) by Maurice T. James Identification of the blowflies of North America Blowflies are important from a medical and has been made much easier and more secure in veterinary standpoint. Some are obligatory or recent years by the publication of the monograph facultative parasites on man or on domestic or of that family by Hall (1948). However, there other useful animals. In our area, the primary exists ti0 regional treatment that covers any screwworm, Callitroga hominivorax (Coquerel), definite part of the United States. Hall's mono- 'is the only obligatory parasite that invades graph gives only general information about the living tissue, although larvae of Pmtocalliphora, geographical distribution of most of the species. represented in the Califdrnia fauna by seven These considerations, together with the fact that known species, feed on the blood of nesting Hall had obviously examined an insufficient birds, often with fatal results. Of the facultative amount of material from the western states, parasites, Callitroga macellaria (Fabricius), makes a review of the California species partic- Phaenicia sericata (Meigen), and Phormia regina ularly desirable.
    [Show full text]
  • A Phylogenetic Analysis of the Megadiverse Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera)
    UC Riverside UC Riverside Previously Published Works Title A phylogenetic analysis of the megadiverse Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera) Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3h73n0f9 Journal Cladistics, 29(5) ISSN 07483007 Authors Heraty, John M Burks, Roger A Cruaud, Astrid et al. Publication Date 2013-10-01 DOI 10.1111/cla.12006 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Cladistics Cladistics 29 (2013) 466–542 10.1111/cla.12006 A phylogenetic analysis of the megadiverse Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera) John M. Heratya,*, Roger A. Burksa,b, Astrid Cruauda,c, Gary A. P. Gibsond, Johan Liljeblada,e, James Munroa,f, Jean-Yves Rasplusc, Gerard Delvareg, Peter Jansˇtah, Alex Gumovskyi, John Huberj, James B. Woolleyk, Lars Krogmannl, Steve Heydonm, Andrew Polaszekn, Stefan Schmidto, D. Chris Darlingp,q, Michael W. Gatesr, Jason Motterna, Elizabeth Murraya, Ana Dal Molink, Serguei Triapitsyna, Hannes Baurs, John D. Pintoa,t, Simon van Noortu,v, Jeremiah Georgea and Matthew Yoderw aDepartment of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA; bDepartment of Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA; cINRA, UMR 1062 CBGP CS30016, F-34988, Montferrier-sur-Lez, France; dAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0C6, Canada; eSwedish Species Information Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7007, SE-750 07, Uppsala, Sweden; fInstitute for Genome Sciences, School of Medicine, University
    [Show full text]
  • 10. GLOCHIDION J. R. Forster & G. Forster, Char. Gen. Pl. 57. 1775, Nom. Cons
    Fl. China 11: 193–202. 2008. 10. GLOCHIDION J. R. Forster & G. Forster, Char. Gen. Pl. 57. 1775, nom. cons. 算盘子属 suan pan zi shu Li Bingtao (李秉滔 Li Ping-tao); Michael G. Gilbert Agyneia Linnaeus; Bradleia Banks ex Gaertner [“Bradleja”]. Trees or shrubs, monoecious, rarely dioecious; indumentum of simple hairs, often absent. Leaves alternate, distichous, or spiral; stipules thick, mostly persistent; petiole short; leaf blade simple, margin entire, venation pinnate. Flowers axillary or supra-axillary, fascicled or in short cymes or umbels, proximal axils with male flowers, distal axils usually with female flowers, usually distinctly pedicellate. Male flowers: pedicels slender or almost absent; sepals 5 or 6, imbricate; petals absent; disk absent; stamens 3–8, connate into an oblong or ellipsoid column, shorter than sepals; anthers 2-locular, extrorse, linear, longitudinally dehiscent, connectives prolonged into an erect acumen; pistillode absent. Female flowers: pedicels stout and short or subsessile; sepals as in male, but slightly thicker; ovary globose, 3–15-locular; ovules 2 per locule; styles connate into a short, thick, cylindric column, apex lobed or toothed, rarely free. Fruit a capsule, globose or depressed globose, ± prominently longitudinally grooved, sunken at apex, dehiscent into 3–15 2-valved cocci when mature, rarely unlobed; exocarp leathery or papery; endocarp crustaceous; styles usually persistent. Seeds not strophiolate, hemispheric or laterally compressed; endosperm fleshy; cotyledon flattened. About 200 species: chiefly in tropical Asia, the Pacific islands, and Malaysia, a few in tropical America and Africa; 28 species (seven endemic, one introduced) in China. Glochidion is noteworthy for its pollination mechanism, which involves a symbiotic relationship with moths of the genus Epicephala closely paralleling that found in Yucca (Kato et al., Proc.
    [Show full text]
  • (Orthoptera, Caelifera, Acrididae) on the Subfamily Level Using Molecular Markers
    e-ISSN 1734-9168 Folia Biologica (Kraków), vol. 67 (2019), No 3 http://www.isez.pan.krakow.pl/en/folia-biologica.html https://doi.org/10.3409/fb_67-3.12 The Evaluation of Genetic Relationships within Acridid Grasshoppers (Orthoptera, Caelifera, Acrididae) on the Subfamily Level Using Molecular Markers Igor SUKHIKH , Kirill USTYANTSEV , Alexander BUGROV, Michael SERGEEV, Victor FET, and Alexander BLINOV Accepted August 20, 2019 Published online September 11, 2019 Issue online September 30, 2019 Original article SUKHIKH I., USTYANTSEV K., BUGROV A., SERGEEV M., FET V., BLINOV A. 2019. The evaluation of genetic relationships within Acridid grasshoppers (Orthoptera, Caelifera, Acrididae) on the subfamily level using molecular markers. Folia Biologica (Kraków) 67: 119-126. Over the last few decades, molecular markers have been extensively used to study phylogeny, population dynamics, and genome mapping in insects and other taxa. Phylogenetic methods using DNA markers are inexpensive, fast and simple to use, and may help greatly to resolve phylogenetic relationships in groups with problematic taxonomy. However, different markers have various levels of phylogenetic resolution, and it’s important to choose the right set of molecular markers for a studied taxonomy level. Acrididae is the most diverse family of grasshoppers. Many attempts to resolve the phylogenetic relationships within it did not result in a clear picture, partially because of the limited number of molecular markers used. We have tested a phylogenetic resolution of three sets of the most commonly utilized mitochondrial molecular markers available for Acrididae sequences in the database: (i) complete protein-coding mitochondrial sequences, (ii) concatenated mitochondrial genes COI, COII, and Cytb, and (iii) concatenated mitochondrial genes COI and COII.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera: Ceraphronoidea) of the Neotropical Region
    doi:10.12741/ebrasilis.v10i1.660 e-ISSN 1983-0572 Publication of the project Entomologistas do Brasil www.ebras.bio.br Creative Commons Licence v4.0 (BY-NC-SA) Copyright © EntomoBrasilis Copyright © Author(s) Taxonomy and Systematic / Taxonomia e Sistemática Annotated keys to the species of Megaspilidae (Hymenoptera: Ceraphronoidea) of the Neotropical Region Registered on ZooBank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub: 4CD7D843-D7EF-432F-B6F1-D34F1A100277 Cleder Pezzini¹ & Andreas Köhler² 1. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Agronomia, Departamento de Fitossanidade. 2. Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul, Departamento de Biologia e Farmácia, Laboratório de Entomologia. EntomoBrasilis 10 (1): 37-43 (2017) Abstract. A key to the species of Megaspilidae occurring in Neotropical Region is given, and information on the 20 species in four genera is provided, including data on their distribution and host associations. The Megaspilidae fauna is still poorly known in the Neotropical region and more studies are necessary. Keywords: Biodiversity; Insect; Megaspilid; Parasitoid wasps; Taxonomy. Chaves de identificação para as espécies de Megaspilidae (Hymenoptera: Ceraphronoidea) na Região Neotropical Resumo. É fornecida chave de identificação para os quatro gêneros e 20 espécies de Megaspilidae que ocorrem na Região Neotropical assim como dados sobre as suas distribuições e associações. A fauna de Megaspilidae da Região Neotropical é pouco conhecida e mais estudos são necessários. Palavras-Chave: Biodiversidade; Inseto; Megaspilídeos; Taxonomia; Vespas parasitoides. pproximately 800 species of Ceraphronoidea are Typhlolagynodes Dessart, 1981, restricted to Europe; Holophleps described worldwide, although it is estimated that Kozlov, 1966, to North America and Europe; Lagynodes Förster, there are about 2,000 (MASNER 2006).
    [Show full text]