Ground-Water Development in Several Areas of Northeastern Illinois

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ground-Water Development in Several Areas of Northeastern Illinois REPORT OF INVESTIGATION 47 Printed by authority of the State of Illinois—Ch. 127, IRS, Par. 58.29 STATE OF ILLINOIS HON. OTTO KERNER, Governor DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION WILLIAM SYLVESTER WHITE, Director BOARD OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION WILLIAM SYLVESTER WHITE, Chairman ROGER ADAMS, Ph.D., D.Sc, H.D., Chemistry ROBERT H. ANDERSON, B.S., Engineering THOMAS PARK, Ph.D., Biology CHARLES E. OLMSTED, Ph.D., Botany LAURENCE L. SLOSS, Ph.D., Geology WILLIAM L. EVERITT, E.E., Ph.D., University of Illinois DELYTE W. MORRIS, Ph.D., President, Southern Illinois University ILLINOIS STATE WATER SURVEY LIBRARY COPY MAY 0 1988 STATE WATER SURVEY DIVISION WILLIAM C. ACKERMANN, Chief URBANA 1964 98475—1500—1-63 370 CONTENTS Page Abstract 1 Summary 1 Introduction 2 Well-numbering system 3 Acknowledgments .... ............................ 3 Hadley Valley area near Joliet 4 Geography and climate 4 Geology 5 Occurrence of ground water 6 Hydraulic properties of aquifer and confining bed 8 Aquifer tests 8 Theoretical effects of pumping 11 Geohydrologic boundaries of aquifer 11 Construction features and yields of wells 12 Ground-water withdrawals 14 Fluctuations of water levels and their significance 15 Configuration of prezometric surface of aquifer 17 Streamflow and ground-water runoff 19 Recharge to aquifer 20 Model aquifer and mathematical model 21 Practical sustained yield of existing well field and potential yield of aquifer 22 Woodstock area 23 Geography and climate 23 Geology 24 Occurrence of ground water 27 Hydraulic properties of aquifers and their confining beds 28 Aquifer tests 28 Theoretical effects of pumping 31 Ground-water withdrawals 31 Construction features and yields of wells 33 Fluctuations of water levels and their significance 34 Configuration of piezometric surface of aquifers 35 Recharge to aquifers 37 Vertical permeability of confining bed 38 Model aquifer and mathematical model . 38 Practical sustained yield of existing well fields 39 Libertyville area 39 Geography and climate 40 Geology 40 Occurrence of ground water 43 Water-yielding properties of aquifers 43 Silurian dolomite aquifer 43 Glacial drift aquifers 45 Probable yields of dolomite wells 46 Construction features of wells and pumps 47 Ground-water withdrawals ................... 48 Leakage through Maquoketa Formation 50 Fluctuations of water levels and their significance 50 Configuration of piezometric surface of aquifers 51 Coefficient of transmissibility of Silurian dolomite aquifer at Libertyville 55 Recharge to aquifers 55 Vertical permeability of confining bed 56 Practical sustained yield of existing well fields at Libertyville and Mundelein 56 Silurian dolomite aquifer 56 . Glacial drift aquifer 57 Chicago Heights area 57 Geography and climate 57 Geology 58 Occurrence of ground water 59 Page Construction features of wells and pumps 61 Ground-water withdrawals 62 Leakage through Maquoketa Formation 64 Fluctuations of water levels and their significance 65 Configuration of piezometric surface of aquifer 69 Recharge to aquifer 69 Water-yielding properties of Silurian dolomite aquifer 72 Coefficient of transmissibility................................................................................................................... 72 Effects of dewatering on yields of dolomite wells 72 Gravity yield of Silurian dolomite aquifer 73 Vertical permeability of confining bed 74 Probable yields of wells 74 Practical sustained yield of existing well fields at Chicago Heights and Park Forest 74 LaGrange area 75 Geography and climate 75 Geology 76 Occurrence of ground water 78 Construction features of wells and pumps 78 Ground-water withdrawals 79 Leakage through Maquoketa Formation 80 Fluctuations of water levels and their significance 80 Configuration of piezometric surface of aquifer 81 Water-yielding properties of Silurian dolomite aquifer 83 Effects of dewatering 85 Probable yields of wells 86 Recharge to aquifer 86 Vertical permeability of confining bed 86 Practical sustained yield of existing well fields at LaGrange and Western Springs 87 Other selected areas 87 Conclusions 91 References 93 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Page 1 Location of Joliet, Woodstock, Chicago Heights, Libertyville, and LaGrange 3 2 Location of Hadley Valley area and municipal well field near Joliet 4 3 Annual and mean monthly precipitation at Joliet 5 4 Bedrock topography east of Joliet 5 5 Cross sections of glacial drift and piezometric profiles east of Joliet 6 6 Saturated thickness of sand and gravel deposits in Hadley Valley area 8 7 Location of selected wells and test holes in Hadley Valley area 8 8 Location of wells used in aquifer tests in Hadley Valley area 9 9 Generalized construction features and logs of observation wells in Hadley Valley area 9 10 Time-drawdown graphs for two wells in Hadley Valley area 10 11 Theoretical distance-drawdown graph for aquifer tests in Hadley Valley area 10 12 Graph of theoretical distance-drawdown for aquifer similar to that in Hadley Valley area 11 13 Plan of image-well system for aquifer in Hadley Valley area..., 12 14 Graph of theoretical time-drawdown considering barrier boundaries for aquifer in Hadley Valley area 12 15 Generalized construction features and logs of production wells in Hadley Valley area 12 16 Location of production and observation wells in Hadley Valley area 13 17 Average monthly pumpage from sand and gravel aquifer in Hadley Vallev area.. 14 18 Average monthly pumpage from five wells in Hadley Valley area, 1951-1961 14 19 Average annual pumpage from sand and gravel aquifer in Hadley Valley area, 1951-1961, subdivided by'well 15 20 Ground-water pumpage (A), daily water levels in well 5 7d2 (B), and daily precipi• tation (C) during 1959 in Hadley Valley area 15 Figure Page 21 Water levels in well 5.7d2 in Hadley Valley area, 1950-1961 15 22 Water levels in well 5 4g in Hadley Valley area, 1950-1953 16 23 Nonpumping levels in five wells in Hadley Valley area, 1950-1961 16 24 Pumping levels in five wells in Hadley Valley area, 1950-1961 17 25 Relation between average pumpage and decline in water levels in Hadley Valley area 17 26 Approximate elevation of piezometric surface in Hadley Valley area, May 24-25, 1962 17 27 Drainage basin of Spring Creek and area of diversion in Hadley Valley area 19 28 Flow-duration curve for Spring Creek in Hadley Valley area 19 29 Streamflow at gaging station on Spring Creek in Hadley Valley area, 1932 19 30 Location of partial record stream-gaging stations in Hadley Valley area 20 31 Orientation of model aquifer for Hadley Valley area 21 32 Mechanical analyses of samples from well 27 3c in Hadley Valley area 22 33 Location of pumping centers in Woodstock area 23 34 Annual precipitation at Marengo 23 35 Mean monthly precipitation at Marengo 23 36 Bedrock topography of Woodstock area 24 37 Bedrock geology of Woodstock area 24 38 Cross section of glacial drift and piezometric profiles in Woodstock area 25 39 Thickness of unconsolidated deposits overlying the bedrock in Woodstock area 25 40 Mechanical analyses of samples for well in Woodstock area 25 41 Location of selected wells and test holes in Woodstock area 28 42 Time-recovery graph for well 5.7d3 at Woodstock 28 43 Location of wells used in aquifer tests at Woodstock 29 44 Generalized graphic logs of wells used in aquifer test 4 at Woodstock 29 45 Time-drawdown graph for well 32 3c2 at Woodstock 29 46 Distance-drawdown graph for aquifer test 4 at Woodstock 30 47 Time-drawdown graphs for three wells at Woodstock 30 48 Graph of theoretical time-drawdown for lower aquifer at Woodstock 31 49 Ground-water pumpage from sand and gravel aquifers at Woodstock, 1921-1962.... 32 50 Ground-water pumpage from sand and gravel aquifers at Woodstock, 1952-1962.... 32 51 Graphs of average daily pumpage in three wells in new municipal well field at Woodstock 32 52 Generalized construction features and logs of production wells in old municipal well field at Woodstock 33 53 Well locations in old municipal well field at Woodstock 33 54 Well locations in new municipal well field at Woodstock 34 55 Generalized construction features and logs of production wells in new municipal well field at Woodstock , 34 56 Nonpumping levels in wells at Woodstock, 1956-1962 34 57 Pumping levels in wells at Woodstock, 1956-1962 35 58 Relation between average pumping rate and decline of water levels in old municipal well field at Woodstock 35 59 Approximate elevation of piezometric surface of lower aquifer in Woodstock area, August-September 1962 36 60 Model aquifer (A) and mathematical model (B) for lower aquifer at Woodstock.... 38 61 Theoretical distance-drawdown graph for lower aquifer at Woodstock 39 62 Location of Libertyville area 40 63 Annual precipitation at Waukegan 40 64 Mean monthly precipitation at Waukegan 40 65 Bedrock topography of Libertyville area 41 66 Bedrock geology of Libertyville area 41 67 Thickness of Silurian rocks in Libertyville area 41 68 Cross section of glacial drift and piezometric profiles in Libertyville area 41 69 Thickness of unconsolidated deposits overlying bedrock in Libertyville area 41 70 Location of selected wells and test holes in Libertyville area 43 71 Coefficient of transmissibility versus specific capacity for several values of well radius and pumping period 45 72 Specific-capacity frequency graphs for dolomite wells in Libertyville area 45 73 Estimated specific capacities of wells in Silurian dolomite aquifer in Libertyville area 46 Figure Page 123 Water levels in wells at Western Springs, 1924-1962 81 124 Relation between
Recommended publications
  • Thorn Creek Watershed TMDL Stage 1 Report
    Prepared for: ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Thorn Creek Watershed TMDL Stage 1 Report AECOM, Inc February 2009 Document No.: 10042-003-700 AECOM Environment Contents Executive Summary ...........................................................................................................................................1 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Definition of a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) ........................................................................ 1-2 1.2 Targeted Waterbodies for TMDL Development ............................................................................. 1-3 2.0 Watershed Characterization................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Watershed Location......................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Topography...................................................................................................................................... 2-4 2.3 Land use .......................................................................................................................................... 2-7 2.4 Soils................................................................................................................................................ 2-11 2.5 Population .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 64, No. 117/Friday, June 18
    Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 117 / Friday, June 18, 1999 / Proposed Rules 32831 FDA encourages individuals or firms in that document and no further activity DATES: The comment period is ninety with relevant data or information to will be taken on this proposed rule. (90) days following the second present such information at the meeting USEPA does not plan to institute a publication of this proposed rule in a or in written comments to the record. second comment period on this action. newspaper of local circulation in each You may request a transcript of the Any parties interested in commenting community. public meeting from the Freedom of on this action should do so at this time. ADDRESSES: The proposed base flood Information Office (HFI±35), Food and DATES: Written comments must be elevations for each community are Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers received on or before July 19, 1999. available for inspection at the office of Lane, rm. 12A±16, Rockville, MD 20857, ADDRESSES: Written comments should the Chief Executive Officer of each approximately 15 working days after the be mailed to: J. Elmer Bortzer, Chief, community. The respective addresses meeting. The transcript of the public Regulation Development Section, Air are listed in the following table. meeting and submitted comments will Programs Branch (AR±18J), FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: be available for public examination at Environmental Protection Agency, Matthew B. Miller, P.E., Chief, Hazards the Dockets Management Branch Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Study Branch, Mitigation Directorate, (address above) between 9 a.m. and 4 p. Chicago, Illinois 60604.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS REGIONAL GREENWAYS and TRAILS IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM an Executive Summary*
    T I HE G MPLEMENTATION G N And the Illinois DepartmentAnd the Resources of Natural REENWAY ORTHEASTERN REENWAYS the Forest Preserve of Cook County District Forest the I was LLINOIS Adopted by NIPC. June 19, 1997 NIPC. June 19, by Adopted N REENWAYS LANNING Illinois Prairie Trail Authority, Illinois Prairie Trail and additional support from G ORTHEASTERN O A P With funding from With the A ROGRAM PENLANDS ND ND A M P I Developed by Developed EGIONAL LLINOIS T S R R LLINOIS A is a nonprofit RAIL AP UMMARY ND A Recognizing the Recognizing I P : O P EGIONAL was created in 1957 by in 1957 created was ROJECT LLINOIS O ND LANNING I F P ROJECT PPORTUNITIES MPLEMENTATION T P I ROGRAM (NIPC) northeastern illinois planning commission C RAILS ORTHEASTERN OMMISSION RAILS ORTHEASTERN N T N PENLANDS CKNOWLEDGMENTS OMMISSION HE ND HE T C be the Illinois General Assemblythe to advisory planning agency comprehensive six-county Chicago metropolitan the for Illinois Planning area. The Northeastern charges: Commission three the gave Act conduct research and collect data for To local advise and assist planning; to prepare comprehensive and to government; development guide the plans and policies to Kane, counties of Cook, of the DuPage, McHenryLake, and Will. O protecting, to organization dedicated and enhancing open space - expanding, natural a healthy provide - to land and water place for and a more livable environment region. people of the all the A importance of of a region-wide network Authority Illinois Prairie Trail trails, the Illinois Northeastern the with contracted Planning Commission and Openlands Project Regional of the an update develop to funds were Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Floods of October 1954 in the Chicago Area, Illinois and Indiana
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OP THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY FLOODS OF OCTOBER 1954 IN THE CHICAGO AREA ILLINOIS AND INDIANA By Warren S. Daniels and Malcolm D. Hale Prepared in cooperation with the STATES OF ILLINOIS AND INDIANA Open-file report Washington, D. C., 1955 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY FLOODS OF OCTOBER 1954 IN THE CHICAGO AREA ILLINOIS AND INDIANA By Warren S. Daniels and Malcolm D. Hale Prepared in cooperation with the STATES OF ILLINOIS AND INDIANA Open-file report Washington, D. C., 1955 PREFACE This preliminary report on the floods of October 1954 in the Chicago area of Illinois and Indiana was prepared by the Water Resources Division, C. G. Paulsen, chief, under the general direction of J. V. B. Wells, chief, Surface Water Branch. Basic records of discharge in the area covered by this report were collected in cooperation with the Illinois De­ partment of Public Works and Buildings, Division of Waterways; the Indiana Flood Control and Water Resources Commission; and the Indiana Department of Conservation, Division of Water Re­ sources. The records of discharge were collected and computed under the direction of J. H. Morgan, district engineer, Champaign, 111.; and D. M. Corbett, district engineer, Indi­ anapolis, Ind. The data were computed and te^t prepared by the authors in the district offices in Illinois and Indiana. The report was assembled by the staff of the Technical Stand­ ards Section in Washington, D. C., Tate Dalrymple, chief. li CONTENTS Page Introduction............................................. 1 General description of floods............................ 1 Location.............................................. 1 Little Calumet River basin...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Thorn Creek Watershed TMDL Stage 1 Report
    Prepared for: ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Thorn Creek Watershed TMDL Stage 1 Report AECOM, Inc Updated March 2011 Document No.: 10042-003-700 AECOM Environment Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Definition of a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) ........................................................................ 1-2 1.2 Targeted Waterbodies for TMDL Development ............................................................................. 1-3 2.0 Watershed Characterization .................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Watershed Location ......................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Topography ...................................................................................................................................... 2-4 2.3 Land Use .......................................................................................................................................... 2-6 2.4 Soils .................................................................................................................................................. 2-9 2.5 Population .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CCDOTH NPDES MS4 Annual Report: 2017–2018
    Cook County Department of Transportation and Highways 69 W. Washington Street Suite 2300 Chicago, IL 60602 Phone 312-603-1600 Storm Water Management Program Annual Report March 2017 – March 2018 Illinois Environmental Protection Agency General Permit ILR400485 For Discharges from Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems ATTACHMENT A Changes to Best Management Practices (BMPs) or Measurable Goals During Reporting Period March 2017 – March 2018 PUBLIC EDUCATION AND OUTREACH BMP: Use website to post MS4 permit documentation and links to other agency’s resources GOAL: Add links to CCDOTH website STATUS: Various website links and MS4 permit information have been added to CCDOTH website. See Attachment B for detailed information. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION / INVOLVEMENT BMP: Volunteering in Stormwater-Related Activities GOAL: Participation in the North Brach Chicago of the River Watershed Workgroup STATUS: CCDOTH joined a new watershed workgroup for the North Branch of the Chicago River (which is in both Lake and Cook Counties). The purpose of the workgroup is to update the North Branch watershed plan, implement a water quality monitoring program in the North Branch and its major tributaries, and conduct outreach efforts to educate watershed residents and businesses on ways to reduce their contribution to polluted runoff into the waterway. CCDOTH contributes membership dues which fund water monitoring, the crucial evidence needed for baseline metrics and setting improvement goals for certain pollutants that are impairing the waterway including nutrients, phosphates, and chlorides. CCDOTH will continue its participation within next reporting period. Additionally, CCDOTH began participating in the Illinois Road and Transportation Builders Association’s, Landscaping and Erosion Control Subcommittee.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Surveys in the Lake Michigan Basin 1996-2006: Chicago and Calumet River Sub-Basins
    Region Watershed Program 5931 Fox River Drive Plano, Illinois 60548 Fish Surveys in the Lake Michigan Basin 1996-2006: Chicago and Calumet River Sub-basins Stephen M. Pescitelli and Robert C. Rung August 2009 Summary For all 16 stations sampled in 2006 we collected 1,995 fish, representing 35 species from 11 families. No threatened or endangered species were encountered. Four non- native species were present, including common carp, goldfish, white perch, and round goby. No Asian carp were collected or observed. The number of species and relative abundance was very similar for the 9 stations collected in both 2001 and 2006. Only 3 stations were sampled in 1996, yielding 17 species and 158 individuals. None of the stations sampled in 1996 were included in the subsequent surveys due to access problems, however, species compositions for 1996 were similar to the 2001 and 2006 studies. Stream quality was relatively low for all Chicago River sub-basin stations. North Shore Channel (HCCA-02) had the highest IBI score; 22 on a scale of 0-60. The lowest score was found on the West Fork of the North Branch (HCCB-13), where only 4 native species were collected, resulting in an IBI of 9. Three stations were sampled in the Chicago River sub-basin in both 2001 and 2006 surveys, and showed very similar IBI scores in both years with differences in IBI of 4 points or less. The one station sampled in 1996 on the North Branch was at Touhy Avenue and had an IBI of 14. Stream quality ratings were also low for the Calumet River sub-basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago Southland's Green TIME Zone
    Chicago Southland’s Green TIME Zone Green Transit, Intermodal, Manufacturing, Environment Zone A Core Element of the Southland Vision 2020 for Sustainable Development © Center for Neighborhood Technology 2010 Table of Contents America’s First Green TIME Zone 1 The Southland Green TIME Zone Strategy 2 Transit-Oriented Development 3 Intermodal: Cargo-Oriented Development 6 Manufacturing for a Green Economy 8 Environment: A Binding Thread 12 A Greener Return on Investment 14 Making It Happen 15 A Model for Livable and Workable Communities 18 The Southland Green TIME Zone Framework 18 America’s First Green TIME Zone The southern suburbs of Chicago (the Southland) The Green TIME Zone of Chicago’s Southland grew up in the nineteenth century with a dual capitalizes on these emerging trends with a strategy identity: as residential communities from which through which older communities can translate people rode the train to downtown jobs and as the value of their established rail infrastructure industrial centers that rose around the nexus of and manufacturing capacity into desirable the nation’s freight rail network. Over the last two neighborhoods, good jobs, and environmental generations, many of these communities endured improvement. The strategy is built on three linked economic hardship as residents and businesses mechanisms for sustainable redevelopment: transit- left for sprawling new suburbs and international oriented development (TOD) to establish livable pressures eroded the industrial base. The communities, cargo-oriented development (COD) environment of the Southland and the entire Chicago region suffered as farmland was paved over at ever freight movements, and green manufacturing to accelerating rates, vehicle miles traveled climbed buildto capture a healthy the economic economy benefitswith a bright of intermodal future.
    [Show full text]
  • Floods of October 1954 in the Chicago Area Illinois and Indiana
    Floods of October 1954 in the Chicago Area Illinois and Indiana By WARREN S. DANIELS and MALCOLM D. HALE FLOODS OF 1954 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1370-B Prepared in cooperation with the States of Illinois and Indiana UNITED STATES GOVE'RNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1958 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - Price 35 cents PREFACE This report on the floods of October 1954 in the Chicago area, Illinois and Indiana, was prepared by the U. S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division, C. G. Paulsen, chief, under the general direction of J. V. B. Wells, chief, Surface Water Branch. Basic records of stage and discharge were collected in cooper­ ation with the following agencies: Illinois Department of Public Works and Buildings, Division of Waterways; Illinois Department of Registration and Education, Water Survey Division; Department of Highways, Cook County, Ill. Indiana Flood Control and Water Resources Commission; and Indiana Department of Conservation, Division of Water Resources. The flood profile data were furnished by the Illinois Division of Waterways and by the Corps of Engineers. The records of stage and discharge were collected and computed under the direction of J. H. Morgan, district engineer. Champaign, Ill .• and D. M. Corbett. district engineer. Indianapolis. Ind. The Illinois part of the report was prepared by W. S. Daniels. the Indiana part by M.D. Hale. each being assisted by personnel in his respective district. The short section on flood frequency was pre­ pared by the special studies unit of the Champaign district.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery Report for Chicago River Watershed
    Discovery Report Chicago River Watershed, HUC # 07120003 Illinois Counties –Cook, Lake, and Will Counties Indiana County – Lake County 02/12/2015 Project Area Community List Illinois Illinois County Illinois Community County Illinois Community Village of Alsip Village of Lincolnwood Village of Bedford Park Village of Lynwood City of Blue Island City of Markham Village of Bridgeview Village of Merrionette Park City of Burbank Village of Midlothian Village of Burnham Village of Morton Grove City of Calumet Village of Niles Village of Calumet Park Village of Norridge City of Chicago Village of Northbrook City of Chicago Heights Village of Northfield Village of Chicago Ridge City of Oak Forest Town of Cicero Village of Oak Lawn City of Country Club Hills Village of Oak Park Village of Crestwood Village of Olympia Fields Village of Dixmoor Village of Orland Hills Village of Dolton Village of Orland Park Cook Village of East Hazel Crest City of Palos Heights Cook Village of Elmwood Park City of Palos Hills City of Evanston Village of Palos Park Village of Evergreen Park City of Park Ridge Village of Flossmoor Village of Phoenix Village of Ford Heights Village of Posen Village of Glencoe Village of Richton Park Village of Glenview Village of Riverdale Village of Glenwood Village of Robbins Village of Golf Village of Skokie City of Harvey Village of South Chicago Heights Village of Harwood Heights Village of South Holland Village of Hazel Crest Village of Thornton Village of Hickory Hills Village of Wilmette City of Hometown Village of Winnetka
    [Show full text]
  • Chicagoland Environmental Network Member Organizations March 2015
    Chicagoland Environmental Network Member Organizations March 2015 1. Active Transportation Alliance, Chicago, Illinois 2. Alliance for the Great Lakes, Chicago, Illinois 3. American Farmland Trust, Washington, D.C. 4. American Lung Association, Chicago, Illinois 5. Animalia Project, Chicago, Illinois 6. The Anti-Cruelty Society, Chicago, Illinois 7. Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 8. Audubon Chicago Region, Skokie, Illinois 9. Bird Conservation Network, Skokie, Illinois 10. Bluestem Communications, Chicago, Illinois 11. Bolingbrook Park District, Bolingbrook, Illinois 12. Boone County Conservation District, Belvedere, Illinois 13. Brushwood Center at Ryerson Woods, Deerfield, Illinois 14. Butterfield Creek Steering Committee, Flossmoor, Illinois 15. Butterprint Historic Farm, Monee, Illinois 16. Cabin Nature Center, Wood Dale, Illinois 17. Calumet Ecological Park Association, Chicago, Illinois 18. Calumet Environmental Resource Center, Chicago, Illinois 19. Campton Township Open Space, St. Charles, Illinois 20. Caretakers of the Environment International/USA, Wilmette, Illinois 21. The Center for Instruction, Staff Development, and Education, Carbondale, Illinois 22. Center for Neighborhood Technology, Chicago, Illinois 23. Chicago Academy of Sciences / Peggy Notebaert Nature Museum, Chicago, Illinois 24. Chicago Audubon Society, Chicago, Illinois 25. Chicago Botanic Garden, Glencoe, Illinois 26. Chicago Conservation Corps, Chicago, Illinois 27. Chicago Council on Science and Technology, Chicago, Illinois 28. Chicago Gateway Green, Chicago, Illinois 29. Chicago Herpetological Society, Chicago, Illinois 30. Chicago High School for Agricultural Sciences, Chicago, Illinois 31. Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning, Chicago, Illinois 32. Chicago Ornithological Society, Chicago, Illinois 33. Chicago Park District, Chicago, Illinois 34. Chicago Recycling Coalition, Chicago, Illinois 35. Chicago Region Interpreters, Downers Grove, Illinois 36. Chicago Wilderness, Chicago, Illinois 37. Chicago Zoological Society/Brookfield Zoo, Brookfield, Illinois 38.
    [Show full text]
  • 093-26MS2001-Print
    Transactions of the Illinois State Academy of Science received 1/4/00 (2000), Volume 93, #4, pp. 261-270 accepted 10/2/00 Seed Bank Ecology of Butterfield Creek Watershed Along Old Plank Road Trail Matthew S. Lake, Peter Gunther*, Deann C. Grossi, Holly L. Bauer Division of Science Governors State University University Park, IL 60466-0975 *Project Director (e-mail address: [email protected]) ABSTRACT Butterfield Creek watershed in Matteson, Illinois includes a wetland whose seed banks are of particular interest because of the presence of Old Plank Road Trail (OPRT). The trail runs from east to west bisecting the surrounding area into north and south wetland habitats. The resulting fragmentation of this landscape provides an interesting opportunity to investigate the effect of landscape fragmentation on seed bank ecology. The objective of this research was to determine any differential in seed bank composition related to landscape fragmentation resulting from OPRT. We removed a total of 60 core samples (30 from each side of the study area) representing three sequential depths, 0- 15cm, 15-30cm, and 30-45cm respectively. Core samples were transported to the labo- ratory for comparative determinations of seed bank germination. Results indicate that there is a discontinuity in the composition of the north and south seed banks as a function of soil depth. Landscape fragmentation brought about by the construction of the railroad (ca.1855, Molony and Ogorek, 1998) and back-flooding of the south side of Butterfield Creek caused a cessation of seed bank formation on the south side, which appears to be a remnant of pre-railroad vegetation seed deposition.
    [Show full text]