DOCSLIB.ORG

Little Calumet River Detailed Watershed Plan (DWP) Prepared by the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago (MWRD) in 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Little Calumet River Detailed Watershed Plan (DWP) Prepared by the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago (MWRD) in 2014 December 20, 2017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Metropolitan Planning Council is grateful to the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency for providing funding to support watershed planning work for four watersheds in Cook County. MPC and Christopher B. Burke Engineering (CBBEL) also appreciate the guidance and reviews provided by Illinois EPA staff. This plan was prepared in part using United States Environmental Protection Agency funds under Section 319 (h) of the Clean Water Act, distributed through the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency. MPC and CBBEL would also like to acknowledge contributions, ideas, and information drawn from watershed planning work led by the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP). CMAP has managed watershed planning projects for numerous areas in Northeastern Illinois, including the Thorn Creek and Boone-Dutch Creek watersheds. CMAP maintains a webpage with information about watershed plans and watershed planning work in the region. The approved plans developed by CMAP and partner engineering firms, notably Geosyntec Consultants, were valuable resources from which structural ideas and content were drawn for this watershed planning document. Sections of the Resource Inventory in this plan mirror material from CMAP-led plans where the information is relevant across the region. This was an important efficiency for plan development and provides for some consistency in plans across the region. We would particularly like to thank Holly Hudson, Kelsey Pudlock, Nora Beck, and Jason Navota for being valuable collaborating partners in watershed planning and stormwater work. This watershed planning document is a supplement to the Little Calumet River Detailed Watershed Plan (DWP) prepared by the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago (MWRD) in 2014. The DWP thoroughly addresses flooding issues in the watershed. This complementary document focuses on water quality. MWRD has provided numerous datasets, mapping tools and information to support the 2017 watershed planning work. Two additional references of great benefit in the watershed planning work were the “Guidance for Developing Watershed Action Plans in Illinois,” developed by CMAP and Illinois EPA, and USEPA’s “Handbook for Developing Watershed Plans to Restore and Protect Our Waters.” Finally, MPC and CBBEL would like to thank the members of the Peer Review Committee that lent their experience and expertise to the Plan development process: Matt Bardol: Geosyntec Consultants Noel Basquin: Cook County Michael "Mick" Cosme: MWRD Deanna Doohaluk: The Conservation Foundation K.C. Doyle: Cook County Joe Exl: Northwestern Indiana Regional Planning Commission (NIRPC) Holly Hudson: CMAP Eric Otto: Forest Preserve District of Cook County John Quail: Friends of the Chicago River Dom Tocci: Cook County Nancy Williamson: Illinois Department of Natural Resources Greg Wolterstorff: V3 Companies 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................. 2 Chapter 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 10 1.1 Watershed-Based Plan Scope and Purpose .......................................................................... 10 1.2 Addendum to Detailed Watershed Plan ............................................................................... 12 1.3 Who should use this Plan and how it should be used ........................................................... 13 1.4 Impacts of Development within the Watershed ................................................................... 14 1.5 Funding for the Watershed Plan ........................................................................................... 14 Chapter 2 Watershed Planning Area, Vision, Goals and Objectives .................................................... 15 2.1 Watershed Issues Based on Stakeholder Input ..................................................................... 15 2.2 Vision .................................................................................................................................... 15 2.3 Goals and Objectives ............................................................................................................. 15 2.4 Water quality ........................................................................................................................ 16 2.5 Natural Resources ................................................................................................................. 17 2.6 Stormwater Management .................................................................................................... 17 2.7 Green Infrastructure ............................................................................................................. 17 2.8 Responsible Development .................................................................................................... 17 2.9 Education .............................................................................................................................. 18 Chapter 3 Little Calumet River Watershed Resource Inventory .......................................................... 19 3.1 Watershed Boundaries ......................................................................................................... 19 3.2 Population and Demographics .............................................................................................. 23 Future Land Use Projections ......................................................................................... 23 3.3 Jurisdictions, Local Governments and Districts ..................................................................... 24 3.4 Climate and Precipitation...................................................................................................... 29 3.5 Climate Change ..................................................................................................................... 30 3.6 Soils ....................................................................................................................................... 32 Hydrologic Soil Groups .................................................................................................. 33 Hydric Soils .................................................................................................................... 35 Soil Drainage Class ........................................................................................................ 36 Highly Erodible Soils ...................................................................................................... 38 3.7 Floodplains ............................................................................................................................ 39 3.8 Wetlands ............................................................................................................................... 41 3.9 Land Use and Land Cover ...................................................................................................... 42 3.10 Impervious Surface ............................................................................................................... 44 Coal Tar-Based Sealants ................................................................................................ 45 3 3.11 Open Space Reserve ............................................................................................................. 46 3.12 Presettlement Land Cover .................................................................................................... 48 3.13 Watershed Drainage System ................................................................................................. 49 Midlothian Creek/Natalie Creek.................................................................................... 50 Little Calumet River ....................................................................................................... 50 Calumet Union Drainage Ditch ...................................................................................... 51 Plum Creek .................................................................................................................... 51 3.14 Physical Stream Conditions ................................................................................................... 51 Watercourse Assessment Methodology ....................................................................... 51 Channelization Assessment Methodology .................................................................... 53 Riparian Area Assessment Methodology ...................................................................... 56 Plum Creek Channelization, Riparian and Erosion ........................................................ 58 Plum Creek (Portion in Will County) - Channelization, Riparian and Erosion ................ 59 Midlothian Creek/Natalie Creek - Channelization, Riparian and Erosion ...................... 60 Calumet Union Drainage Ditch - Channelization, Riparian and Erosion ........................ 61 Little Calumet River - Channelization, Riparian and Erosion ......................................... 61 3.15 Detention Basin Inventory .................................................................................................... 63 3.16 Cook County Forest Preserve District Lakes .......................................................................... 66 3.17 Water Quality
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Area Assessment
    -- ------------------------- ~ v_o_lu_rn_e_4_ • Socio-Economic Profile Environmental Quality Archaeological Resources '--",~ -THORN CREEK AREA ASSESSMENT '~ DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES THORN CREEK AREA ASSESSMENT. VOLUME 4 Part I: Socio-Economic Profile I1linois Department ofNatural Resources Office ofRealty and Environmental Planning Division of Energy and Environmental Assessment 524 South Second Springfield, Il1inois 62701 (217) 524-0500 Part II: Environmental Quality Il1inois Department of Natural Resources Office of Scientific Research and Analysis I1linois State Water Survey 2204 Griffith Drive Champaign, Il1inois 61820 (217) 244-5459 Waste Management and Research Center One East Hazelwood Drive Champaign, Il1inois 61820 (217) 333-8940 Part ill: Archaeological Resources Steve R. Ahler I1linois Department ofNatural Resources Office ofScientific Research and Analysis Il1inois State Museum Spring & Edward Streets Springfield, Il1inois 62706 (217) 782-7387 1999 300 Printed by the authority of the State of Il1inois Other CTAP Publications Thorn Creek Area Assessment Vol. 1. Geology Vol. 2 Water Resources Vol. 3 Living Resources Thorn Creek: An Inventory ofthe Region's Resources - 22-page color booklet Descriptive inventories and area assessments are also available for the following regions: Rock River Upper Des Plaines River Cache River Illinois River Bluffs . Mackinaw River Spoon River Illinois Headwaters .Driftless Area Illinois Big Rivers Lower Rock River Fox River Sinkhole Plain Kankakee River Sugar-Pecatonica Rivers Kishwaukee River Vermilion River Embarras River Upper Sangamon River Also available: Illinois Land Cover, An Atlas, plus CD-ROM Inventory ofEcologically Resource-Rich Areas in Illinois EcoWatch '98, Annual Report of the Illinois EcoWatch Network Illinois Geographic Information System, CD-ROM ofdigital geospatial data All CTAP and Ecosystems Program documents are available from the DNR Clearinghouse at (217) 782-7498 or TOO (217) 782-9175.
    [Show full text]
  • Thorn Creek Watershed TMDL Stage 1 Report
    Prepared for: ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Thorn Creek Watershed TMDL Stage 1 Report AECOM, Inc February 2009 Document No.: 10042-003-700 AECOM Environment Contents Executive Summary ...........................................................................................................................................1 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Definition of a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) ........................................................................ 1-2 1.2 Targeted Waterbodies for TMDL Development ............................................................................. 1-3 2.0 Watershed Characterization................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Watershed Location......................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Topography...................................................................................................................................... 2-4 2.3 Land use .......................................................................................................................................... 2-7 2.4 Soils................................................................................................................................................ 2-11 2.5 Population .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 64, No. 117/Friday, June 18
    Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 117 / Friday, June 18, 1999 / Proposed Rules 32831 FDA encourages individuals or firms in that document and no further activity DATES: The comment period is ninety with relevant data or information to will be taken on this proposed rule. (90) days following the second present such information at the meeting USEPA does not plan to institute a publication of this proposed rule in a or in written comments to the record. second comment period on this action. newspaper of local circulation in each You may request a transcript of the Any parties interested in commenting community. public meeting from the Freedom of on this action should do so at this time. ADDRESSES: The proposed base flood Information Office (HFI±35), Food and DATES: Written comments must be elevations for each community are Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers received on or before July 19, 1999. available for inspection at the office of Lane, rm. 12A±16, Rockville, MD 20857, ADDRESSES: Written comments should the Chief Executive Officer of each approximately 15 working days after the be mailed to: J. Elmer Bortzer, Chief, community. The respective addresses meeting. The transcript of the public Regulation Development Section, Air are listed in the following table. meeting and submitted comments will Programs Branch (AR±18J), FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: be available for public examination at Environmental Protection Agency, Matthew B. Miller, P.E., Chief, Hazards the Dockets Management Branch Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Study Branch, Mitigation Directorate, (address above) between 9 a.m. and 4 p. Chicago, Illinois 60604.
    [Show full text]
  • Park Forest South/University Park: a Guide to Its History and Development
    Governors State University OPUS Open Portal to University Scholarship Park Forest South Regional Archives 1986 Park Forest South/University Park: A Guide to Its History and Development Larry A. McClellan Governors State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://opus.govst.edu/region_pfs Recommended Citation McClellan, Larry A., "Park Forest South/University Park: A Guide to Its History and Development" (1986). Park Forest South. 11. https://opus.govst.edu/region_pfs/11 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Regional Archives at OPUS Open Portal to University Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Park Forest South by an authorized administrator of OPUS Open Portal to University Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. lllHlllll lllllllllll l lll ll lll l lll lllll\1111111111111 11111 31611 00339 6220 Par!( .Forest South/ Univer.sit_y Par{: A Guide to 2t.s 8-(i.story and De'(!e[qJment p,!J krJ .A. .:Mccrecran (joYJenwr.s State Uniw:r.s it.!J UniYJer.sit.!J Part 1[[inoi.s I ARCHIVE. F 549 .U64 M33X 1986 FOR REFERENCE Do Not Take From This Room l [ [ I PARK FOREST SOUTH/UNIVERSITY PARK: A Guide to Its History and Develop11ent l By Larry A. McClellan Governors State University University Park, Illinois ) GOVERNORS STATE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY ~RCHIVE. 11 11111 11 549 3 1611 00339 6220 .U64 M33X 1986 Printed by Governors State University and Village of University Park 698 Burnham Drive Park Forest South, Illinois 60466 (312) 534-6451 Cover Photo: Pine Lake in University Park Note to Librarians: In 1984, the Village name was changed from Park Forest South to University Park.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS REGIONAL GREENWAYS and TRAILS IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM an Executive Summary*
    T I HE G MPLEMENTATION G N And the Illinois DepartmentAnd the Resources of Natural REENWAY ORTHEASTERN REENWAYS the Forest Preserve of Cook County District Forest the I was LLINOIS Adopted by NIPC. June 19, 1997 NIPC. June 19, by Adopted N REENWAYS LANNING Illinois Prairie Trail Authority, Illinois Prairie Trail and additional support from G ORTHEASTERN O A P With funding from With the A ROGRAM PENLANDS ND ND A M P I Developed by Developed EGIONAL LLINOIS T S R R LLINOIS A is a nonprofit RAIL AP UMMARY ND A Recognizing the Recognizing I P : O P EGIONAL was created in 1957 by in 1957 created was ROJECT LLINOIS O ND LANNING I F P ROJECT PPORTUNITIES MPLEMENTATION T P I ROGRAM (NIPC) northeastern illinois planning commission C RAILS ORTHEASTERN OMMISSION RAILS ORTHEASTERN N T N PENLANDS CKNOWLEDGMENTS OMMISSION HE ND HE T C be the Illinois General Assemblythe to advisory planning agency comprehensive six-county Chicago metropolitan the for Illinois Planning area. The Northeastern charges: Commission three the gave Act conduct research and collect data for To local advise and assist planning; to prepare comprehensive and to government; development guide the plans and policies to Kane, counties of Cook, of the DuPage, McHenryLake, and Will. O protecting, to organization dedicated and enhancing open space - expanding, natural a healthy provide - to land and water place for and a more livable environment region. people of the all the A importance of of a region-wide network Authority Illinois Prairie Trail trails, the Illinois Northeastern the with contracted Planning Commission and Openlands Project Regional of the an update develop to funds were Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Floods of October 1954 in the Chicago Area, Illinois and Indiana
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OP THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY FLOODS OF OCTOBER 1954 IN THE CHICAGO AREA ILLINOIS AND INDIANA By Warren S. Daniels and Malcolm D. Hale Prepared in cooperation with the STATES OF ILLINOIS AND INDIANA Open-file report Washington, D. C., 1955 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY FLOODS OF OCTOBER 1954 IN THE CHICAGO AREA ILLINOIS AND INDIANA By Warren S. Daniels and Malcolm D. Hale Prepared in cooperation with the STATES OF ILLINOIS AND INDIANA Open-file report Washington, D. C., 1955 PREFACE This preliminary report on the floods of October 1954 in the Chicago area of Illinois and Indiana was prepared by the Water Resources Division, C. G. Paulsen, chief, under the general direction of J. V. B. Wells, chief, Surface Water Branch. Basic records of discharge in the area covered by this report were collected in cooperation with the Illinois De­ partment of Public Works and Buildings, Division of Waterways; the Indiana Flood Control and Water Resources Commission; and the Indiana Department of Conservation, Division of Water Re­ sources. The records of discharge were collected and computed under the direction of J. H. Morgan, district engineer, Champaign, 111.; and D. M. Corbett, district engineer, Indi­ anapolis, Ind. The data were computed and te^t prepared by the authors in the district offices in Illinois and Indiana. The report was assembled by the staff of the Technical Stand­ ards Section in Washington, D. C., Tate Dalrymple, chief. li CONTENTS Page Introduction............................................. 1 General description of floods............................ 1 Location.............................................. 1 Little Calumet River basin...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Thorn Creek Watershed TMDL Stage 1 Report
    Prepared for: ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Thorn Creek Watershed TMDL Stage 1 Report AECOM, Inc Updated March 2011 Document No.: 10042-003-700 AECOM Environment Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Definition of a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) ........................................................................ 1-2 1.2 Targeted Waterbodies for TMDL Development ............................................................................. 1-3 2.0 Watershed Characterization .................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Watershed Location ......................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Topography ...................................................................................................................................... 2-4 2.3 Land Use .......................................................................................................................................... 2-6 2.4 Soils .................................................................................................................................................. 2-9 2.5 Population .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Map Icons ICONS Family Picnic 137Th St Robbins
    Marque tte Rd South Shore 69th Cultural Cntr. Marquette Park Park 94 Stony Island Bryn Mawr 71 South Shore 6 67 5 Central Zone South Shore Dr Metra Southwest Service Southwest Metra 49 South Zone 75 Windsor Park 48 Rainbow Beach 4 76th St Me Park Metra Rock Island District Line tra 76th St El 44 e 29 ct 8 r 9 ic Vincennes Ave Cheltenham D i 79th St. 90 s t 169 Columbus Ave r 79th i Wrightwood c t Dan Ryan L 15 i 79 79th St n A Woods- e North 83rd St. Cottage Grove Ave Grove Cottage 83rd St. _! Ashland Ave Dan Ryan 0 Ashburn Woods- " Foster South Chicago Ave Park Dr King Luther Martin Dr. Central Morgan St _! Dan Ryan Trail Lake 87th St. s Burley Ave Woods- i 41 South Zone ! East Gresham o Dan Ryan _ n 87th i Woods- 24 l l 87th St 1 I West 87 3 H o m e t o w n 773 Location / Activity Area Activities / Amenities nd Metra Electric District Line 26 a Stony Island Ave ** OPux y 91st St. r C4 Beaubien Woods Blvd Jeffery w Calumet Division G n H Dan Ryan Mackinaw Ave C4 Beaubien Woods Boat Launch D 774 O a k t Woods- Maintenance ! Dan Ryan Woods 91st St. s 28 Ew E3 Brownell Woods OJ e 91st Street in w South Headquarters g h 95E Michigan C4 Burnham Prairie & NatureL a Preserve w n u t A X28 769 u 94 v C5 Burnham Woods Golf Course ASo e E v e r g r e e n Colfax Ave D5 Calumet City Playfield 95th/Dan Ryan 95th St.
    [Show full text]
  • CCDOTH NPDES MS4 Annual Report: 2017–2018
    Cook County Department of Transportation and Highways 69 W. Washington Street Suite 2300 Chicago, IL 60602 Phone 312-603-1600 Storm Water Management Program Annual Report March 2017 – March 2018 Illinois Environmental Protection Agency General Permit ILR400485 For Discharges from Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems ATTACHMENT A Changes to Best Management Practices (BMPs) or Measurable Goals During Reporting Period March 2017 – March 2018 PUBLIC EDUCATION AND OUTREACH BMP: Use website to post MS4 permit documentation and links to other agency’s resources GOAL: Add links to CCDOTH website STATUS: Various website links and MS4 permit information have been added to CCDOTH website. See Attachment B for detailed information. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION / INVOLVEMENT BMP: Volunteering in Stormwater-Related Activities GOAL: Participation in the North Brach Chicago of the River Watershed Workgroup STATUS: CCDOTH joined a new watershed workgroup for the North Branch of the Chicago River (which is in both Lake and Cook Counties). The purpose of the workgroup is to update the North Branch watershed plan, implement a water quality monitoring program in the North Branch and its major tributaries, and conduct outreach efforts to educate watershed residents and businesses on ways to reduce their contribution to polluted runoff into the waterway. CCDOTH contributes membership dues which fund water monitoring, the crucial evidence needed for baseline metrics and setting improvement goals for certain pollutants that are impairing the waterway including nutrients, phosphates, and chlorides. CCDOTH will continue its participation within next reporting period. Additionally, CCDOTH began participating in the Illinois Road and Transportation Builders Association’s, Landscaping and Erosion Control Subcommittee.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Surveys in the Lake Michigan Basin 1996-2006: Chicago and Calumet River Sub-Basins
    Region Watershed Program 5931 Fox River Drive Plano, Illinois 60548 Fish Surveys in the Lake Michigan Basin 1996-2006: Chicago and Calumet River Sub-basins Stephen M. Pescitelli and Robert C. Rung August 2009 Summary For all 16 stations sampled in 2006 we collected 1,995 fish, representing 35 species from 11 families. No threatened or endangered species were encountered. Four non- native species were present, including common carp, goldfish, white perch, and round goby. No Asian carp were collected or observed. The number of species and relative abundance was very similar for the 9 stations collected in both 2001 and 2006. Only 3 stations were sampled in 1996, yielding 17 species and 158 individuals. None of the stations sampled in 1996 were included in the subsequent surveys due to access problems, however, species compositions for 1996 were similar to the 2001 and 2006 studies. Stream quality was relatively low for all Chicago River sub-basin stations. North Shore Channel (HCCA-02) had the highest IBI score; 22 on a scale of 0-60. The lowest score was found on the West Fork of the North Branch (HCCB-13), where only 4 native species were collected, resulting in an IBI of 9. Three stations were sampled in the Chicago River sub-basin in both 2001 and 2006 surveys, and showed very similar IBI scores in both years with differences in IBI of 4 points or less. The one station sampled in 1996 on the North Branch was at Touhy Avenue and had an IBI of 14. Stream quality ratings were also low for the Calumet River sub-basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago Southland's Green TIME Zone
    Chicago Southland’s Green TIME Zone Green Transit, Intermodal, Manufacturing, Environment Zone A Core Element of the Southland Vision 2020 for Sustainable Development © Center for Neighborhood Technology 2010 Table of Contents America’s First Green TIME Zone 1 The Southland Green TIME Zone Strategy 2 Transit-Oriented Development 3 Intermodal: Cargo-Oriented Development 6 Manufacturing for a Green Economy 8 Environment: A Binding Thread 12 A Greener Return on Investment 14 Making It Happen 15 A Model for Livable and Workable Communities 18 The Southland Green TIME Zone Framework 18 America’s First Green TIME Zone The southern suburbs of Chicago (the Southland) The Green TIME Zone of Chicago’s Southland grew up in the nineteenth century with a dual capitalizes on these emerging trends with a strategy identity: as residential communities from which through which older communities can translate people rode the train to downtown jobs and as the value of their established rail infrastructure industrial centers that rose around the nexus of and manufacturing capacity into desirable the nation’s freight rail network. Over the last two neighborhoods, good jobs, and environmental generations, many of these communities endured improvement. The strategy is built on three linked economic hardship as residents and businesses mechanisms for sustainable redevelopment: transit- left for sprawling new suburbs and international oriented development (TOD) to establish livable pressures eroded the industrial base. The communities, cargo-oriented development (COD) environment of the Southland and the entire Chicago region suffered as farmland was paved over at ever freight movements, and green manufacturing to accelerating rates, vehicle miles traveled climbed buildto capture a healthy the economic economy benefitswith a bright of intermodal future.
    [Show full text]
  • Floods of October 1954 in the Chicago Area Illinois and Indiana
    Floods of October 1954 in the Chicago Area Illinois and Indiana By WARREN S. DANIELS and MALCOLM D. HALE FLOODS OF 1954 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1370-B Prepared in cooperation with the States of Illinois and Indiana UNITED STATES GOVE'RNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1958 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - Price 35 cents PREFACE This report on the floods of October 1954 in the Chicago area, Illinois and Indiana, was prepared by the U. S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division, C. G. Paulsen, chief, under the general direction of J. V. B. Wells, chief, Surface Water Branch. Basic records of stage and discharge were collected in cooper­ ation with the following agencies: Illinois Department of Public Works and Buildings, Division of Waterways; Illinois Department of Registration and Education, Water Survey Division; Department of Highways, Cook County, Ill. Indiana Flood Control and Water Resources Commission; and Indiana Department of Conservation, Division of Water Resources. The flood profile data were furnished by the Illinois Division of Waterways and by the Corps of Engineers. The records of stage and discharge were collected and computed under the direction of J. H. Morgan, district engineer. Champaign, Ill .• and D. M. Corbett. district engineer. Indianapolis. Ind. The Illinois part of the report was prepared by W. S. Daniels. the Indiana part by M.D. Hale. each being assisted by personnel in his respective district. The short section on flood frequency was pre­ pared by the special studies unit of the Champaign district.
    [Show full text]