Parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) of the Cabbage Seedpod Weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Georgia, USA

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) of the Cabbage Seedpod Weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Georgia, USA J. HYM. RES. Vol. 15(2), 2006, pp. 187–207 Parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) of the Cabbage Seedpod Weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Georgia, USA GARY A. P. GIBSON,MICHAEL W. GATES AND G. DAVID BUNTIN (GAP) Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Biodiversity and Integrated Pest Management, K. W. Neatby Bldg., 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON, Canada, K1A 0C6; email: [email protected] (MWG) Systematic Entomology Laboratory, PSI, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, c/o National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560-0168, USA (GDB) Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, Georgia Station, Griffin, GA 30223, USA __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Abstract.—Five families and 13 species of Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera) were obtained from mass-reared seedpods of Brassica napus L. (Brassicaceae) as putative parasitoids of the cabbage seedpod weevil, Ceutorhynchus obstrictus (Marsham) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), in Georgia, USA. The species are Conura torvina (Cresson) (Chalcididae), Euderus glaucus Yoshimoto and Necremnus tidius (Walker) (Eulophidae), Brasema allynii (French) n. comb. (from Eupelmus Dalman) and Eupelmus cyaniceps Ashmead (Eupelmidae), Eurytoma tylodermatis Ashmead (Eurytomidae), and Lyrcus incertus (Ashmead), L. maculatus (Gahan), L. perdubius (Girault), Mesopolobus moryoides Gibson, Neocatolaccus tylodermae (Ashmead), Pteromalus cerealellae (Ashmead) and Pteromalus sp. (Pteromalidae). An illustrated key is provided to differentiate the taxa. Lyrcus maculatus constituted about 96% of all reared Pteromalidae and 86% of the total parasitoid fauna. The associations of B. allynii, E. glaucus, E. cyaniceps, E. tylodermatis, L. incertus, N. tylodermae, Pteromalus sp. and P. cerealellae with C. obstrictus are new, but some of these species likely are hyperparasitoids or emerged from insect contaminants of the mass-reared seedpods. The only previous report of a parasitoid of C. obstrictus in eastern North America, Trichomalus perfectus (Walker) (Pteromalidae), is a misidentification. The parasitoid fauna of C. obstrictus in Georgia is discussed relative to that known for western North America. __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The cabbage seedpod weevil, Ceuto- tera: Chalcidoidea) parasitoids of the cab- rhynchus obstrictus (Marsham) (Coleoptera: bage seedpod weevil in western North Curculionidae), was introduced from Eur- America, including Breakey et al. (1944), ope to western North America about Doucette (1944, 1948), Hanson et al. (1948), 70 years ago. Since then it has become the Carlson et al. (1951), McLeod (1953), Walz most important insect pest of canola and (1957), and Dosdall et al. (in press). rape, Brassica napus L. and B. rapa L. Murchie and Williams (1998) listed 7 (Brassicaceae), in most areas of the conti- identified and 4 unidentified species in 9 nent where these crops are grown (Ca´r- genera and 5 families of Chalcidoidea as camo et al. 2001, Kuhlmann et al. 2002). It parasitoids of C. obstrictus in North Amer- was first reported from eastern North ica, but almost all of the species names America in North Carolina, USA (USDA either represent misidentifications or are 1960), and is now known to extend from now recognized as junior synonyms of Georgia to Quebec and Ontario, Canada older names (Gibson et al. 2005). Dosdall et (Brodeur et al. 2001, Mason et al. 2004). al. (in press) reported another six chalcid There have been several surveys of the species as reared from B. napus and B. rapa introduced and native chalcid (Hymenop- seedpods in Alberta. Consequently, the 188 JOURNAL OF HYMENOPTERA RESEARCH Table 1. Chalcid parasitoids associated with the report of parasitoids of C. obstrictus in cabbage seedpod weevil in North America, including eastern North America. Buntin (1998) for Georgia the number of specimens and percentage (in parenthesis) of total parasitoids reared by Buntin stated that greater than 96% of the para- (1998). sitoids recovered from seedpods of B. napus in Georgia were Trichomalus perfectus Western North (Walker) (Pteromalidae). This species is the Taxon America Georgia most common biological control agent of C. Chalcididae obstrictus in Europe (Murchie and Williams Conura albifrons (Walsh) + – 1998) and was long thought to have been 1 + ? Conura side (Walker) – introduced to North America along with Conura torvina (Cresson) + 9 (0.8) the seedpod weevil. However, Gibson et al. Eulophidae (2005) showed that all previous reports of + Euderus albitarsis – T. perfectus in western North America were (Zetterstedt) Euderus glaucus 2 2 (0.2) misidentifications of Trichomalus lucidus Yoshimoto (Walker), another European species. Necremnus tidius (Walker) + 6 (0.5) Accurate identification of parasitoid spe- Eupelmidae cies is a prerequisite for successful classical Brasema allynii (French) 2 5 (0.5) biological control and integrated pest man- Eupelmus cyaniceps 2 4 (0.4) agement. The senior author examined the Ashmead parasitoids reared by Buntin (1998) as part + Eupelmus vesicularis – of a larger study to document the diversity (Retzius) and identity of the chalcid parasitoids of C. Eurytomidae obstrictus in North America. The primary + Eurytoma tylodermatis 25 (2.2) purpose of Buntin (1998) had been to Ashmead examine the effect of trap cropping on the Pteromalidae number of seedpod weevils and its para- + Chlorocytus sp. – sitoids in canola crops in Georgia. The Lyrcus incertus (Ashmead) 2 6 (0.5) Lyrcus maculatus (Gahan) + 967 (86.0) species identities of the parasitoids had Lyrcus perdubius (Girault) + 60 (5.3) therefore never been thoroughly investi- Mesopolobus bruchophagi + – gated. The purpose of this paper is to (Gahan) provide the first comprehensive informa- + Mesopolobus mayetiolae – tion on the diversity of the chalcid para- (Gahan) Mesopolobus moryoides + 2 (0.2) sitoids reared from canola seedpods in Gibson southeastern USA in order to facilitate Neocatolaccus tylodermae 2 33 (2.9) future studies of the parasitoid fauna (Ashmead) associated with C. obstrictus throughout 2 Pteromalus cerealellae 1 (0.1) North America. (Ashmead) Pteromalus spp.2 + 4 (0.4) Trichomalus lucidus + – MATERIALS AND METHODS (Walker) The chalcid parasitoids identified in this 1 Single record, likely a misidentification of C. torvina study were obtained from mass-reared (see text). seedpods of B. napus collected from the 2 Females in the two regions represent different Bledsoe Research Farm (33u10.6359N species (see text). 84u24.3549W) located near Griffin, Georgia, from 1994–1996, as per ‘‘Material and chalcid fauna purportedly parasitizing C. methods’’ in Buntin (1998). Although not obstrictus in western North America in- stated, the pods were screened for insect cludes at least 14 species (Table 1). In contaminants prior to rearing. Contami- contrast, there is only a single published nants mainly included aphids (Hemiptera: VOLUME 15, NUMBER 2, 2006 189 Aphididae) and larvae and pupae of the using Adobe PhotoshopTM to enhance cla- diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) rity. (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). The reared parasitoids had been stored in ethanol, RESULTS but were critical-point dried, point- A total of 1,127 specimens of Chalcidoi- mounted, and identified to genus by the dea were sufficiently intact that they could senior author using the relevant family be identified accurately. Of these, there keys in Gibson et al. (1997). The senior was a single male Pachyneuron aphidis author is responsible for all species identi- (Bouche´) and a female and male Asaphes fications except Eurytoma tylodermatis Ash- suspensus (Nees) (Pteromalidae). Members mead (Eurytomidae), which was identified of Pachyneuron and Asaphes are obligate by MWG. Information concerning the hyperparasitoids of aphids (Gibson et al. method of species identification within 1997) and are not dealt with further. The each genus is provided under the relevant remaining 1,124 specimens included 5 species discussion. Voucher specimens are families, 10 genera, and 13 species of deposited in the Canadian National Col- Chalcidoidea that are possible parasitoids lection of Insects and Arachnids (CNC), of C. obstrictus. These taxa are keyed below Ottawa, Ontario, the University of Georgia and subsequently treated by family in Museum of Natural History (UGCA), alphabetical order. The key also segregates Athens, Georgia, and the United States Trichomalus Thomson and Chlorocytus Gra- National Museum of Natural History ham, the only two genera reared from C. (USNM), Washington, District of Colum- obstrictus in western North America (Dos- bia. Terms used for parasitoid structure dall et al. in press) that were not recovered follow Gibson (1997). Photographs are by Buntin (1998) (Table 1). The two taxa composite serial images that were com- are included in the key because species of bined using Auto-MontageTM.These both genera occur in eastern North Amer- images and the scanning electron micro- ica and may eventually be reared as part of photographs were digitally retouched the regional C. obstrictus parasitoid fauna. KEY TO CHALCIDOIDEA PUTATIVELY PARASITIZING C. OBSTRICTUS IN GEORGIA 1 Hind leg with elongate coxa of similar length to conspicuously swollen and ventrally toothed femur, and with curved tibia (Fig. 1) . Conura torvina
Recommended publications
  • Philornis Downsi Interactions with Its Host in the Introduced Range and Its Parasitoids in Its Native Range a Thesis Submitted T
    PHILORNIS DOWNSI INTERACTIONS WITH ITS HOST IN THE INTRODUCED RANGE AND ITS PARASITOIDS IN ITS NATIVE RANGE A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Ismael Esai Ramirez IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE Adviser: Dr. George E. Heimpel December 2018 i © Ismael Esai Ramirez ii Acknowledgments This thesis was completed with the guidance of faculty and staff and the knowledge I have acquired from professors in the Entomology Department and classes along the progress of my degree. My gratitude goes, especially, to my advisor Dr. George E. Heimpel, for taking me as his graduate student, for believing in me, and teaching me valuable skills I need to succeed in a career in academia I am appreciative for the help and feedback I received on my thesis. I am especially grateful for the help I received from my committee members, Drs. Marlene Zuk and Ralph Holzenthal, for their invaluable support and feedback. The generosity has been tremendous. Additionally, I want to thank Dr. Rebecca A. Boulton for her insights in my thesis and her friendship, and Dr. Carl Stenoien for aiding with my chapters. I want to give recognition to the Charles Darwin Research Station staff for their support, Dr. Charlotte Causton, Ma. Piedad Lincango, Andrea Cahuana, Paola Lahuatte, and Courtney Pike. I want to thank my fellow graduate students, undergraduate students, and my lab-mates, Jonathan Dregni, Hannah Gray, Mary Marek-Spartz, James Miksanek, and Charles Lehnen for their support and friendship. To my field assistants and hosts in mainland Ecuador, Isidora Rosales and her family, Mauricio Torres and Enzo Reyes that aided me during fieldwork.
    [Show full text]
  • (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) De La Región Neotropical Biota Colombiana, Vol
    Biota Colombiana ISSN: 0124-5376 [email protected] Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos "Alexander von Humboldt" Colombia Arias, Diana C.; Delvare, Gerard Lista de los géneros y especies de la familia Chalcididae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) de la región Neotropical Biota Colombiana, vol. 4, núm. 2, diciembre, 2003, pp. 123- 145 Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos "Alexander von Humboldt" Bogotá, Colombia Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=49140201 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto Biota Colombiana 4 (2) 123 - 145, 2003 Lista de los géneros y especies de la familia Chalcididae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) de la región Neotropical Diana C. Arias1 y Gerard Delvare2 1 Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos “Alexander von Humboldt”, AA 8693, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia. [email protected], [email protected] 2 Departamento de Faunística y Taxonomía del CIRAD, Montpellier, Francia. [email protected] Palabras Clave: Insecta, Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea, Chalcididae, Parasitoide, Avispas Patonas, Neotrópico El orden Hymenoptera se ha dividido tradicional- La superfamilia Chalcidoidea se caracteriza por presentar mente en dos subórdenes “Symphyta” y Apocrita, este úl- en el ala anterior una venación reducida, tan solo están timo a su vez dividido en dos grupos con categoría de sec- presentes la vena submarginal, la vena marginal, la vena ción o infraorden dependiendo de los autores, denomina- estigmal y la vena postmarginal.
    [Show full text]
  • A Phylogenetic Analysis of the Megadiverse Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera)
    UC Riverside UC Riverside Previously Published Works Title A phylogenetic analysis of the megadiverse Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera) Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3h73n0f9 Journal Cladistics, 29(5) ISSN 07483007 Authors Heraty, John M Burks, Roger A Cruaud, Astrid et al. Publication Date 2013-10-01 DOI 10.1111/cla.12006 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Cladistics Cladistics 29 (2013) 466–542 10.1111/cla.12006 A phylogenetic analysis of the megadiverse Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera) John M. Heratya,*, Roger A. Burksa,b, Astrid Cruauda,c, Gary A. P. Gibsond, Johan Liljeblada,e, James Munroa,f, Jean-Yves Rasplusc, Gerard Delvareg, Peter Jansˇtah, Alex Gumovskyi, John Huberj, James B. Woolleyk, Lars Krogmannl, Steve Heydonm, Andrew Polaszekn, Stefan Schmidto, D. Chris Darlingp,q, Michael W. Gatesr, Jason Motterna, Elizabeth Murraya, Ana Dal Molink, Serguei Triapitsyna, Hannes Baurs, John D. Pintoa,t, Simon van Noortu,v, Jeremiah Georgea and Matthew Yoderw aDepartment of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA; bDepartment of Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA; cINRA, UMR 1062 CBGP CS30016, F-34988, Montferrier-sur-Lez, France; dAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0C6, Canada; eSwedish Species Information Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7007, SE-750 07, Uppsala, Sweden; fInstitute for Genome Sciences, School of Medicine, University
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix S4. the Tentorium and Its External Landmarks in the Chalcididae
    Appendix S4 . The tentorium and its external landmarks in the Chalcididae This study is the first in the whole superfamily Chalcidoidea to investigate the tentorium as a phylogenetic character and to establish the connection between the inner skeleton of the cephalic capsule and its external landmarks on the back of the head. In this section, details are provided on the methodology used by GD to examine and code the different bridges. S4.1. Context Phylogenetic informativeness of the characters of the head capsule in Hymenoptera was recently highlighted (Vilhelmsen 2011; Burks & Heraty 2015; Zimmermann & Vilhelmsen 2016). However, interpretation is difficult and requires landmarks (Burks & Heraty, 2015). More precisely, the identity of the sclerotized structures between the occipital foramen and the oral fossa are still debated. Homology and nomenclature of these structures were established by Snodgrass (1928, 1942 and 1960) and reassessed by Vilhelmsen (1999) and Burks & Heraty (2015). These authors describe various types of ‘bridges’, such as postgenal, hypostomal and subforaminal bridges, according to the cephalic part – postgena or hypostoma – from which they putatively originate. In his phylogenetic analyses of the Chalcididae, Wijesekara (1997a & 1997b) used the back of the head – reduced to a single character – and distinguished an ‘hypostomal bridge’ and a ‘genal bridge’. The detailed examination of the back of the head in the Eurytomidae (Lotfalizadeh et al. 2007), probable sister group of the Chalcididae, provided useful characters for their phylogeny and prompted GD to also investigate these characters in the Chalcididae. Chalcididae exhibit variable and puzzling structures that may be phylogenetically informative but request a thorough identification of homologies among the subfamilies and more largely with other families of Chalcidoidea.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Hymenoptera Research
    c 3 Journal of Hymenoptera Research . .IV 6«** Volume 15, Number 2 October 2006 ISSN #1070-9428 CONTENTS BELOKOBYLSKIJ, S. A. and K. MAETO. A new species of the genus Parachremylus Granger (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a parasitoid of Conopomorpha lychee pests (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) in Thailand 181 GIBSON, G. A. P., M. W. GATES, and G. D. BUNTIN. Parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) of the cabbage seedpod weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Georgia, USA 187 V. Forest GILES, and J. S. ASCHER. A survey of the bees of the Black Rock Preserve, New York (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) 208 GUMOVSKY, A. V. The biology and morphology of Entedon sylvestris (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), a larval endoparasitoid of Ceutorhynchus sisymbrii (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) 232 of KULA, R. R., G. ZOLNEROWICH, and C. J. FERGUSON. Phylogenetic analysis Chaenusa sensu lato (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) using mitochondrial NADH 1 dehydrogenase gene sequences 251 QUINTERO A., D. and R. A. CAMBRA T The genus Allotilla Schuster (Hymenoptera: Mutilli- dae): phylogenetic analysis of its relationships, first description of the female and new distribution records 270 RIZZO, M. C. and B. MASSA. Parasitism and sex ratio of the bedeguar gall wasp Diplolqjis 277 rosae (L.) (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae) in Sicily (Italy) VILHELMSEN, L. and L. KROGMANN. Skeletal anatomy of the mesosoma of Palaeomymar anomalum (Blood & Kryger, 1922) (Hymenoptera: Mymarommatidae) 290 WHARTON, R. A. The species of Stenmulopius Fischer (Hymenoptera: Braconidae, Opiinae) and the braconid sternaulus 316 (Continued on back cover) INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF HYMENOPTERISTS Organized 1982; Incorporated 1991 OFFICERS FOR 2006 Michael E. Schauff, President James Woolley, President-Elect Michael W. Gates, Secretary Justin O. Schmidt, Treasurer Gavin R.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2016 Reporte Anual 2016 2017 Preview Avances 2017
    CHARLES DARWIN FOUNDATION FOR THE GALAPAGOS ISLANDS FUNDACIÓN CHARLES DARWIN PARA LAS ISLAS GALÁPAGOS Annual Report 2016 Reporte Anual 2016 2017 Preview Avances 2017 CHARLES DARWIN FOUNDATION FOR THE GALAPAGOS ISLANDS FUNDACIÓN CHARLES DARWIN PARA LAS ISLAS GALÁPAGOS Puerto Ayora, Santa Cruz, Galápagos, Ecuador. + 593 (5) 2526 146 / www.darwinfoundation.org / [email protected] Puerto Ayora, Santa Cruz, Galápagos, Ecuador. + 593 (5) 2526 146 / www.darwinfoundation.org / [email protected] The “Charles Darwin Foundation for the Galapagos Islands”. In French “Fondation Charles Darwin pour les îles Galapagos”, Association Internationale sans but lucratif, La "Fundación Charles Darwin para las Islas Galápagos". En francés “Fondation Charles Darwin pour les îles Galapagos”, Association Internationale sans but lucratif, has its registered oice located at Drève du Pieuré 19,1160 Brussels, and is registered under the trade registry of Brussels under the number 0409.359.103, (the “AISBL”). tiene su domicilio social ubicado en Drève du Pieuré 19.1160 Bruselas, y está registrado bajo el registro comercial de Bruselas bajo el número 0409.359.103, (el "AISBL"). CHARLES DARWIN FOUNDATION FOR THE GALAPAGOS ISLANDS / Annual Report ISLANDS 2016 - 2017 Preview THE GALAPAGOS FOR FOUNDATION DARWIN CHARLES 2017 Anual 2016 / Avance / Informe GALÁPAGOS ISLAS LAS PARA DARWIN CHARLES FUNDACIÓN 2 © Daniel Unda García / CDF 3 © Andrés Cruz / CDF Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations 7 Mission and Vision 9 Executive Summary 10 President’s Letter 13 Executive Director’s
    [Show full text]
  • Halona2021r.Pdf
    Terrestrial Arthropod Survey of Hālona Valley, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Naval Magazine Lualualei Annex, August 2020–November 2020 Neal L. Evenhuis, Keith T. Arakaki, Clyde T. Imada Hawaii Biological Survey Bernice Pauahi Bishop Museum Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817, USA Final Report prepared for the U.S. Navy Contribution No. 2021-003 to the Hawaii Biological Survey EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Bishop Museum was contracted by the U.S. Navy to conduct surveys of terrestrial arthropods in Hālona Valley, Naval Magazine Lualualei Annex, in order to assess the status of populations of three groups of insects, including species at risk in those groups: picture-winged Drosophila (Diptera; flies), Hylaeus spp. (Hymenoptera; bees), and Rhyncogonus welchii (Coleoptera; weevils). The first complete survey of Lualualei for terrestrial arthropods was made by Bishop Museum in 1997. Since then, the Bishop Museum has conducted surveys in Hālona Valley in 2015, 2016–2017, 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2020. The current survey was conducted from August 2020 through November 2020, comprising a total of 12 trips; using yellow water pan traps, pitfall traps, hand collecting, aerial net collecting, observations, vegetation beating, and a Malaise trap. The area chosen for study was a Sapindus oahuensis grove on a southeastern slope of mid-Hālona Valley. The area had potential for all three groups of arthropods to be present, especially the Rhyncogonus weevil, which has previously been found in association with Sapindus trees. Trapped and collected insects were taken back to the Bishop Museum for sorting, identification, data entry, and storage and preservation. The results of the surveys proved negative for any of the target groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Composición De La Familia Chalcididae (Hymenoptera
    Composición de la familia Chalcididae Castiñeiras y Hernández, 1980; Zayas, 1981), los (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) en Cuba cuales son recopilados en su mayor parte y actualizados con nuevos datos por Vázquez (en prensa), quien lista un total de 32 hospederos, que se desglosan en: 18 Eduardo PORTUONDO FERRER lepidópteros, nueve himenópteros, tres coleópteros Centro Oriental de Ecosistemas y Biodiversidad (BIOECO) y dos dípteros que son atacados por 18 especies de José A. Saco # 601 esq. Barnada, Santiago de Cuba, Chalcididae. Sobre la distribución del género en el país, CP 90 100, Cuba. solo se tiene la referencia de Castiñeiras y Hernández Email: [email protected] (1980), los cuales incluyen al final de su artículo una tabla con datos de hospederos y distribución de las especies conocidas hasta ese momento para Cuba bajo el RESUMEN. Se actualiza el conocimiento sobre la género Spilochalcis. composición de la familia Chalcididae (Hymenoptera; Chalcidoidea) en Cuba brindándose un listado de 52 MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS especies, de las cuales se confirma 45 como residentes. Son nuevos registros para el país las especies: Haltichella Se revisaron aproximadamente 500 especimenes ornaticornis (Cameron, 1884); Haltichella perpulcra pertenecientes a las siguientes colecciones: Centro (Walsh, 1861); Psilochalcis deceptor (Grissell y Schauff, Oriental de Ecosistemas y Biodiversidad [BIOECO] 1981); Chalcis flevilis (Cresson, 1872), Conura apicalis (Santiago de Cuba); United States National Museum (Ashmead, 1904), Conura igneoides (Kirby, 1883) y of Natural History [USNM] (Smithsonian Institution, Conura phais (Burks, 1940). Se confirma la presencia de Washington, D.C., EEUU); Universidad Central de C. amoena (Say, 1836) y las especies Smiera intermedia Las Villas “Martha Abreu” [UCLV] (Villa Clara); Cresson, 1865 y Smiera scutellaris Cresson, 1865, Estación Experimental Agronómica de Santiago son transferidas a los grupos de especies nigricornis de las Vegas [EEA]; Johannes Gundlach y Pastor y scutellaris, respectivamente.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Management of Crops to Prevent Pest Outbreaks
    1 Management of Crops to Prevent Pest Outbreaks Claudia Daniel,* Guendalina Barloggio, Sibylle Stoeckli, Henryk Luka and Urs Niggli Research Institute of Organic Agriculture, Forschungsinstitut für biologischen Landbau (FiBL), Frick, Switzerland Introduction pests on oilseed rape are usually higher than on vegetables. Therefore, less control is used Organic farmers face the same potentially in oilseed rape which might lead to the severe pest problems as their colleagues in build-up of large pest populations, threatening integrated pest management (IPM) and conven- nearby vegetable fields. With the increasing tional farming systems. However, approaches area of oilseed rape production, pest prob- to manage the pest insects are different because lems in these crops are likely to increase. the aim of organic farming is a holistic system perspective rather than simple reductionist Standards for Organic and IPM control approaches. Organic cropping sys- Production: Similarities tems are designed to prevent damaging levels of pests, thus minimizing the need for direct and Differences and curative pest control (Peacock and Nor- ton, 1990). Within this chapter, we will briefly Organic farming explain the standards for organic farming, which also set the framework for pest control. Organic farming is regulated by international We present a conceptual model for pest control and national organic production standards, in organic farming and describe the influence such as the IFOAM (International Federation of of functional agrobiodiversity and conservation Organic Agriculture Movements) Norms (IF- biological control on pest management. We OAM, 2012), Codex Alimentarius (FAO and focus on the use of preventive strategies and WHO, 2007), or European Union (EU) regula- cultural control methods.
    [Show full text]
  • 176 DIVERSIDAD DE Chalcididae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) EN ÁREAS NATURALES PROTEGIDAS DEL ESTADO DE YUCATÁN Diversity Of
    DIVERSIDAD DE Chalcididae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) EN ÁREAS NATURALES PROTEGIDAS DEL ESTADO DE YUCATÁN Diversity of Chalcididae (Hymenoptera: Chalcididae) in natural reserves in Yucatan State David A. Chay-Hernández1, Hugo Delfín-González1, Virginia Meléndez-Ramírez2 y Alejandro González-Hernández2. 1Campus de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias. Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán. A.P. 4-116 Mérida, Yucatán 97100 MÉXICO. 2Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Laboratorio de Entomología, A.P. 112-F, CP 66450, San Nicolás de los Garza, Nuevo León, MÉXICO. [email protected] Palabras Clave: Chalcididae, Parasitoides, Tipo de vegetación, Areas Naturales Protegidas, Yucatán. Introducción Las áreas naturales protegidas (ANP’s) constituyen porciones terrestres o acuáticas que albergan diferentes ecosistemas y su biodiversidad. A pesar de su importancia y del esfuerzo de conservación de las ANP’s, presentan problemáticas en común: deforestación, degradación de los recursos, muchas veces de mayor magnitud dentro de dichas áreas. A esto hay que agregar el rezago en la documentación de la riqueza de grupos importantes dentro de las ANP´s (SEMARNAT, 2005), como los insectos y en especial las avispas parasitoides (Hochberg, 2000). Las avispas parasitoides de la familia Chalcididae, son parte de la fauna amenazada y desconocida aún dentro de las ANP’s. Las especies de estas avispas han sido utilizados con éxito en programas de control biológico y otras presentan un alto potencial de uso (Clausen, 1978). En los ecosistemas terrestres tienen una función clave, ya que controlan los niveles de las poblaciones de especies de herbívoros, manteniendo la diversidad de éstos y al mismo tiempo conservan la integridad física de las plantas hospederas (LaSalle y Gauld, 1993); de esta forma contribuyen a conservar el balance de los ecosistemas, especialmente en las tierras bajas de áreas tropicales (Delvare, 1995).
    [Show full text]
  • Komoditas : Bunga-Bungaan Tahun 2004-2008 (467 Judul) Jinze
    Komoditas : Bunga-bungaan Tahun 2004-2008 (467 judul) Jinze Noordijk, Katrien Delille, Andre P. Schaffers, Karle V. Sykora, Optimizing grassland management for flower-visiting insects in roadside verges, Biological Conservation, Volume 142, Issue 10, October 2009, Pages 2097-2103, ISSN 0006-3207, DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.04.009. (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V5X-4WBB71H- 1/2/3622bace9a5f6c088d770bcaa28dcc2f) Abstract: The decline of flower-visiting insects is a threat to ecological processes and to the services these insects provide. Roadside verges in the Netherlands span approximately 80,000 km and are often covered with semi-natural grasslands. As such, they also provide a suitable habitat for many insects, but this has received little attention so far. We investigated the effects of different management treatments on flower-visiting insects. We studied flower visitation in a 3 years old experimental set-up with five mowing treatments each replicated five times. Management types were: no management and mowing once or twice per year with and without the removal of hay, representing common forms of management and neglect. During an entire growing season, both flowers (number of species and inflorescences) as well as insects (total abundance and actual flower visits) were investigated. Mowing twice per year with removal of hay showed highest values for all measured variables and this effect persisted throughout the growing season. The early summer cut proved to be very important for insect feeding opportunities, due to the re-flowering of plants later in the growing season. Flower abundance showed high correlations with both plant species richness and the number of insect visits.
    [Show full text]
  • Life Cycle and Host Specificity of the Parasitoid Conura Annulifera
    Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 110(3), 2017, 317–328 doi: 10.1093/aesa/saw102 Advance Access Publication Date: 17 February 2017 Research Research article Life Cycle and Host Specificity of the Parasitoid Conura annulifera (Hymenoptera: Chalcididae), a Potential Biological Control Agent of Philornis downsi (Diptera: Muscidae) in the Galapagos Islands Mariana Bulgarella,1,2,3 Martın A. Quiroga,4 Rebecca A. Boulton,1 Ismael E. Ramırez,1 Roger D. Moon,1 Charlotte E. Causton,5 and George E. Heimpel1 1Department of Entomology, University of Minnesota, 1980 Folwell Ave., St. Paul, MN 55108 ([email protected]; rboulton@ umn.edu; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]), 2Current address: School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, 6140, New Zealand, 3Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected], 4Laboratorio de Ecologıa de Enfermedades. Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral (ICiVet Litoral-CONICET-UNL), RP Kreder 2805, Esperanza, Santa Fe, 3080, Argentina ([email protected]), and 5Charles Darwin Foundation for the Galapagos Islands, Puerto Ayora, Santa Cruz Island, Galapagos Islands, Ecuador ([email protected]) Subject Editor: Karen Sime Received 17 October 2016; Editorial decision 20 December 2016 Abstract The neotropical parasitoid Conura annulifera (Walker) (Hymenoptera: Chalcididae) is known to parasitize bird- parasitic flies in the genus Philornis (Diptera: Muscidae) including P. downsi (Dodge and Aitken), a species that has invaded the Galapagos islands and is negatively impacting populations of Darwin’s finches. We report here some aspects of the life history, field ecology, and host specificity of C. annulifera. We collected puparia of four Philornis species in 13 bird nests during 2015 and 2016 in western mainland Ecuador and found that C.
    [Show full text]