Murphys Flat Reserve Supplement Contents Key
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Aquatic Ecology of the Montagu River Catchment
Aquatic Ecology of the Montagu River Catchment A Report Forming Part of the Requirements for State of Rivers Reporting David Horner Water Assessment and Planning Branch Water Resources Division DPIWE. December, 2003 State of Rivers Aquatic Ecology of the Montagu Catchment Copyright Notice: Material contained in the report provided is subject to Australian copyright law. Other than in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968 of the Commonwealth Parliament, no part of this report may, in any form or by any means, be reproduced, transmitted or used. This report cannot be redistributed for any commercial purpose whatsoever, or distributed to a third party for such purpose, without prior written permission being sought from the Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, on behalf of the Crown in Right of the State of Tasmania. Disclaimer: Whilst DPIWE has made every attempt to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information and data provided, it is the responsibility of the data user to make their own decisions about the accuracy, currency, reliability and correctness of information provided. The Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, its employees and agents, and the Crown in the Right of the State of Tasmania do not accept any liability for any damage caused by, or economic loss arising from, reliance on this information. Preferred Citation: DPIWE (2003). State of the River Report for the Montagu River Catchment. Water Assessment and Planning Branch, Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, Hobart. Technical Report No. WAP 03/09 ISSN: 1449-5996 The Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment The Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment provides leadership in the sustainable management and development of Tasmania’s resources. -
Assessment of Juvenile Eel Resources in South Eastern Australia and Associated Development of Intensive Eel Farming for Local Production
ASSESSMENT OF JUVENILE EEL RESOURCES IN SOUTH EASTERN AUSTRALIA AND ASSOCIATED DEVELOPMENT OF INTENSIVE EEL FARMING FOR LOCAL PRODUCTION G J. Gooley, L. J. McKinnon, B. A. Ingram, B. Larkin, R.O. Collins and S.S. de Silva. Final Report FRDC Project No 94/067 FI SHERIE S RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT Natural Resources CORPOR ATIO N and Environment AGRICULTURE RESOURCES COIISERVAT/Otl ASSESSMENT OF JUVENILE EEL RESOURCES IN SOUTH-EASTERN AUSTRALIA AND ASSOCIATED DEVELOPMENT OF INTENSIVE EEL FARMING FOR LOCAL PRODUCTION G.J Gooley, L.J. McKinnon, B.A. Ingram, B.J. Larkin, R.O. Collins and S.S. De Silva Final Report FRDC Project No 94/067 ISBN 0731143787 Marine and Freshwater Resources Institute, 1999. Copies of this document are available from: Marine and Freshwater Resources Institute Private Bag 20 Alexandra. VIC. 3714. AUSTRALIA.. This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its officers do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS...............................................................................................................................i 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.......................................................................................................................... iii 3 NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARY................................................................................................................! -
Environmental Water Requirements for the Rubicon River
Environmental Water Requirements for The Rubicon River Tom Krasnicki Aquatic Ecologist Water Assessment and Planning Branch Water Resources Division DPIWE. Report Series WRA 02/01 May, 2002. Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS i GLOSSARY OF TERMS ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1. INTRODUCTION 3 2. THE RUBICON RIVER 3 2.1 General Description 4 2.1.1 Catchment and Drainage System 3 2.1.2 Geomorphology and Geology 6 2.1.3 Climate and Rainfall 7 2.1.4 Vegetation 8 2.1.5 Land Use and Degradation 9 2.1.6 Port Sorell Estuary 9 2.1.7 Hydrology 11 2.2. Site Selection 13 2.2.1 The Rubicon River at Smith and Others Rd. 13 3. VALUES 15 3.1 Community Values 15 3.2 State Technical Values 17 3.3 Endangered species 18 3.4 Values Assessed 19 4. METHODOLOGY 20 4.1 Physical Habitat Data 20 4.2 Biological Data 21 4.2.1 Invertebrates 21 4.2.2 Fish 21 4.3 Hydraulic Simulation 21 4.4 Risk Analysis 22 5. RESULTS 24 5.1 Physical Habitat Data 24 5.2 Biological Data 25 5.3 Risk Analysis 26 6. DISCUSSION 29 6.1 Vertebrate Fauna 30 6.1.1 Mordacia mordax and Geotria australis 30 6.1.2 Gadopsis marmoratus 30 6.1.3 Pseudaphritis urvillii 31 6.1.4 Galaxias truttaceus and Galaxias maculatus 31 6.1.5 Galaxias brevipinnis and Neochanna cleaveri 31 6.1.6 Prototroctes maraena 32 6.1.7 Lovettia sealii and Retropinna tasmanica 32 6.1.8 Anguilla australis 32 6.1.9 Salmo trutta 32 6.1.10 Nannoperca australis and Perca fluviatilis 33 6.2 Invertebrate Fauna 33 6.2.1 Astacopsis gouldi 33 6.3 Flow Recommendations 34 6.3.1 Rubicon River at Smith and Others Rd. -
Narawntapu National Park, Hawley Nature Reserve Management Plan 2000)
MANAGEMENT PLAN 2016 Narawntapu National Park HAWLEY NATURE RESERVE Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Narawntapu National Park Hawley Nature Reserve Management Plan 2016 Narawntapu National Park, Hawley Nature Reserve - Management Plan 2016 NARAWNTAPU NATIONAL PARK HAWLEY NATURE RESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN 2016 (Replacing the Narawntapu National Park, Hawley Nature Reserve Management Plan 2000) This management plan replaces the Narawntapu National Park, Hawley Nature Reserve Management Plan 2000. This management plan has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Part 3 of the National Parks and Reserves Management Act 2002. Unless otherwise specified, this plan adopts the interpretation of terms given in the Act. The term ‘Director’ refers to the Director of National Parks and Wildlife. The term ‘Park’ refers to the Narawntapu National Park. The term “Reserve” refers to the Hawley Nature Reserve. The appendices do not form part of this statutory plan, but are provided as additional information to assist in management. The draft management plan was available for public comment from 14 November 2015 until 16 December 2015. Nineteen representations were received on the draft plan, providing valuable information and recommendations for management of the Park. This input and effort is gratefully acknowledged. Approval This management plan was approved by Her Excellency the Governor-in- Council on 29 November 2016 and took effect on 21 December 2016, being seven days after publication of that approval in the Government Gazette. ISBN (book): 978-0-9925963-6-1 ISBN (PDF): 978-0-9925963-7-8 Cover image: Narawntapu National Park. Photo courtesy of Tourism Tasmania & Brian Dullaghan Published by: Parks and Wildlife Service Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment GPO Box 1751 Hobart TAS 7001 Cite as: Parks and Wildlife Service 2016, Narawntapu National Park, Hawley Nature Reserve Management Plan 2016, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Hobart. -
South, Tasmania
Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Guide to Users Background What is the summary for and where does it come from? This summary has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. It highlights important elements of the biodiversity of the region in two ways: • Listing species which may be significant for management because they are found only in the region, mainly in the region, or they have a conservation status such as endangered or vulnerable. • Comparing the region to other parts of Australia in terms of the composition and distribution of its species, to suggest components of its biodiversity which may be nationally significant. The summary was produced using the Australian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. The list of families covered in ANHAT is shown in Appendix 1. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are are not not included included in the in the summary. • The data used for this summary come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. -
Fishes of the Murray-Darling Basin: an Introductory Guide Is the First Book Devoted Exclusively to the Fishes of Australia’S Largest River System
Murray-Darling rainbowfish Fishes of the Murray-Darling Basin Redfin perch Freshwater catfish An introductory guide Mark Lintermans Southern purple-spotted gudgeon Mark Lintermans Fishes of the Murray-Darling Basin: An introductory guide is the first book devoted exclusively to the fishes of Australia’s largest river system. It contains information on the identification, habitats, biology and distribution of the 57 species of freshwater fish found in the Murray-Darling Basin, as well as background information on the threats to fish and aquatic ecosystems. An extensive reference list is also provided. of the Murray-Darling Basin This book will be an invaluable guide for naturalists, students, fishermen, A N I N T RO D UC TO RY G U id E scientists and anyone else interested in the life within our rivers. Learn about the iconic Murray cod (Australia’s largest freshwater fish), and the smaller species such as galaxias, gudgeons, hardyheads and pygmy perch that inhabit the Basin’s waterways. Mark Lintermans of the Murray-Darling Basin A N I N T R O D U C TO RY G U I D E Published by the Murray-Darling Basin Authority Postal address: GPO Box 1801, Canberra ACT 2601 Office location: Level 3, 51 Allara Street, Canberra City ACT Telephone: (02) 6279 0100, international + 61 2 6279 0100 Facsimile: (02) 6248 8053, international + 61 2 6248 8053 Email: [email protected] Internet: http://www.mdba.gov.au For further information contact the Murray-Darling Basin Authority office on (02) 6279 0100 This report may be cited as: Lintermans, M. -
Conserving Migratory Species Under Human Impacts and Climate Change Hsien-Yung Lin Bsc, Msc
Conserving migratory species under human impacts and climate change Hsien-Yung Lin BSc, MSc A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2016 School of Biological Sciences Abstract Migratory species use multiple habitats types and ecosystems to complete their life cycles, which exposes them to multiple human-caused stressors along their migratory routes. Overexploitation, habitat degradation, invasive species and connectivity loss have contributed to the decrease of migratory fishes globally in particular diadromous fishes that migrate between marine and freshwater systems. Therefore, understanding the joint impacts from anthropogenic disturbances and climate change on different habitats (e.g., both feeding and spawning grounds) and habitat connectivity (e.g., migration routes) is important for conserving migratory fish. Management will be most effective when management scales match ecological scales. This is particularly important for conserving migratory species, because of the requirement of multiple connected habitats that may cross local management boundaries. The main goals of this Ph.D. thesis are to quantify the impacts of multiple stressors on migratory fish species and prioritize management actions for conserving populations (chapters 2 & 3), species (chapter 4), and communities (chapter 5). A central challenge for managing diadromous fishes (species that migrate between freshwater and saltwater ecosystems) is to quantify increases in population persistence from actions that improve connectivity or reduce fishing mortality. In chapter 2, I used a population dynamic model and fish movement data to predict the interactive impacts of fishing pressure and connectivity loss by human modification of river flows on Australian bass Percalates novemaculeata. Then, in chapter 3, the monetary cost of management actions which included seasonal closures and restoring connectivity, were included in the model to find the most cost-effective way to conserve this fish population. -
The Fauna of King Island
The Fauna of King Island A guide to identification and conservation management Edited by Richard Donaghey 2003 The Fauna of King Island A guide to identification and conservation management Edited by Richard Donaghey 2003 Published by: King Island Natural Resource Management Group Inc KIRDO Building, George Street, Currie, King Island PO Box 293, King Island 7256 Ph. (03) 6462 1709 or 6462 1825 Fax (03) 6462 1726 © KINRMG Inc July 2003 ISBN XXXXX XXXXX Written by: Dr Richard W. Barnes, Nature Conservation Branch, Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, GPO Box 44, Hobart, Tasmania 7001. Katie Brown, 6 Dangali Court, Golden Grove SA 5125. Former Waterwatch Coordinator of King Island Natural Resource Management Group Inc. Laurie Cook, Freshwater Systems, 82 Waimea Avenue, Sandy Bay, Tasmania 7005 Dr Peter E. Davies, Freshwater Systems, 82 Waimea Avenue, Sandy Bay, Tasmania 7005 and Research Fellow, School of Zoology, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 5, Hobart, Tasmania 7001. Dr Richard Donaghey, 80 Sawards Road, Myalla, Tasmania 7325. Wyn Jones, PO Box 60, Blackheath, New South Wales 2785. Sarah Lloyd, 999 Denmans Road, Birralee, Tasmania 7303. Dr Peter McQuillan, Centre for Environmental Studies, School of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 78, Hobart, Tasmania 7001. Jim Nelson, 68 Dynans Bridge Road, Weegena, Tasmania 7304. Rodney Walker, Native Fish Conservation, Inland Fisheries Service, PO Box 288, Moonah, Tasmania 7009. Photos: Trevor Waite, Bill Wakefield, Peter Brown, Dave Watts, Rob Blakers, Sally Bryant, Richard Barnes, Peter McQuillan, Nick Mooney and Richard Donaghey. Cover illustrations: Eastern pygmy possum (Dave Watts), green and golden frog (Peter Brown), orange-bellied parrot (Dave Watts) Design and desktop production: Fine Print, GPO Box 1676, Hobart, Tasmania 7001. -
Environmental Review Report
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Environmental Review document is the first of a series which comprehensively describe Hydro operations and provide an overview of related aquatic environmental issues in each of its major catchments. This document fulfils some key commitments of the Hydro’s Aquatic Environmental Policy. It will also assist the general public in understanding Hydro operations and issues in the South Esk – Great Lake catchment, as the Hydro commences its Water Management Review in this catchment area. The South Esk Basin is the largest water catchment in Tasmania, making up almost 15% of Tasmania’s land mass. The Basin is comprised of the catchments of the South Esk, Macquarie and Meander Rivers. Water from the Great Lake catchment, which lies on Tasmania’s Central Plateau, is diverted into the South Esk Basin for the purposes of hydro-electric power generation. The Poatina Power Scheme utilises water from the Great Lake catchment, Arthurs Lake (originally in the upper Macquarie River sub-catchment), and diversions of the upper Ouse River, the upper Liffey River and Westons Rivulet – upper Brumbys Creek. It consists of three main storages (Great Lake, Arthurs Lake and Lake Augusta), two power stations (Poatina and Tods Corner) and other water diversion and transfer infrastructure. Also associated with the Poatina Power Scheme is another storage, Woods Lake, the primary function of which is to store water for irrigation. The Poatina Power Scheme diverts between 620 and 730 Mm3 per year of Great Lake water from the Derwent catchment, via Poatina Power Station, into the South Esk catchment. The Trevallyn Power Scheme utilises water from the entire South Esk catchment, harnessing the South Esk, Macquarie and Meander Rivers, and re-using water from the Great Lake catchment discharged from Poatina Power Station. -
Ulletin of the Sheries Research :)Ard of Canada ~Vi,~Qa1biv
ulletin of the sheries Research :)ard of Canada DFO - Librar / MPO - Bibliothèque ~Vi,~qA1BIV 12039422 ------- ----------------------------~1~1~1~/~1~Ÿ~AA-------------------- . r' 4/~ W~An1i i M~ ' ~~/~ ~ f . a I r!^.- ~- ~ A 1 ti 1 1► / w~~1 A 1\ I ■ 1`~ ! ■ s`~F,37~+~~#?~~- ► A~1 ► . A. ~ ~ A`WN%1 h 1\ ~ ~~ ~d ~2"ï:iŸ.-~~ZY _ _ - ~~ ~.. ~ ~_ t.~J.J ~~-~R_~~ `_~ I .. L a-~~~.. .......... ... - _ _ _ _ _ • _ _ / , *1 ----- 111&11~71 V A - - - - - - - - - - Ar / _ .L I■ It \ - -- - - - - - - - - - - ► Â I~ I /rh ow- ."0% 1~i! h 'I 11111111% M A _ 14 M !U!b_b~- - - - - r/IÎ1U/ rr*IU/~ MA1/bvr !J a i •ji J I r t M~ i n 0 qi ! w 11! t ► /0 l!r loi P!/ t h r `t /~ , M~Mw t/`~ ► f/ ~/~~ P t i0di 1 O ty t r ■e : /at~■ i i~ f I :t~ : l :ti I ` w, w Fïstieries and Envi Canada Environment Canada Environnement Canada Fisheries Service des pêches and Marine Service et des sciences de la mer cC AA 1 N late 0 e.ev- 41 s s à■ • /8RA ' e FONT RUSSIAN-ENGLISH DICTIONARY Bulletins of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada are designed to assess and interpret current knowledge in scientific fields pertinent to Canadian fisheries. The Board also publishes the Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada in annual volumes of monthly issues, an Annual Report, and a biennial Review of in- vestigations. The Journal and Bulletins are for sale by Information Canada, Ottawa. -
Biodiversity Summary: South, Tasmania
Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations. -
Environmental Water Requirements for the Emu River
Environmental Water Requirements for The Emu River Tom Krasnicki Aquatic Ecologist Water Assessment Section Water ResourcesDivision DPIWE. Report Series WRA 01/07 December, 2001. Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS i GLOSSARY OF TERMS ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1. INTRODUCTION 3 2. EMU RIVER 4 2.1 General Description 4 2.1.1 Catchment and Drainage System 4 2.1.2 Geomorphology and Geology 5 2.1.3 Climate and Rainfall 5 2.1.4 Vegetation 5 2.1.5 Land Use and Degradation 6 2.1.6 Emu Estuary 6 2.1.7 Hydrology 7 2.2. Site Selection 9 2.2.1 The Emu River off Manina Rd 9 3. VALUES 11 3.1 Community Values 11 3.2 State Technical Values 12 3.3 Endangered species 13 3.4 Values Assessed 15 4. METHODOLOGY 16 4.1 Physical Habitat Data 17 4.2 Biological Data 17 4.2.1 Invertebrates 16 4.2.2 Fish 18 4.2.3 Platypus 17 4.3 Hydraulic Simulation 18 4.4 Risk Analysis 19 5 RESULTS 20 5.1 Physical Habitat Data 21 5.2 Biological Data 21 5.3 Risk Analysis 22 6 DISCUSSION 23 6.1 Vertebrate Fauna 24 6.1.1 Mordacia mordax and Geotria australis 24 6.1.2 Gadopsis marmoratus 25 6.1.3 Pseudaphritis urvillii 25 6.1.4 Galaxias truttaceus and Galaxias maculatus 25 6.1.5 Galaxias brevipinnis and Galaxias cleaveri 26 6.1.6 Prototroctes maraena 26 6.1.7 Lovettia sealii and Retropinna tasmanica 26 6.1.8 Anguilla australis 26 6.1.9 Salmo trutta and Oncorhyncus mykiss 27 6.1.10 Ornithorhyncus anatinus 27 6.2 Invertebrate Fauna 28 6.2.1 Astacopsis gouldi 28 6.2.2 Beddomeia protuberata 28 6.3 Flow Recommendations 29 6.3.1 Emu River off Manina Rd 29 7 REFERENCES 30 APPENDIX 1.